P. 172 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 17101-17200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bdssexg 17101	Bounded version of ssexg 4272. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( A C_ B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	bdssexd 17102	Bounded version of ssexd 4273. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	bdrabexg 17103*	Bounded version of rabexg 4279. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( A e. V -> { x e. A | ph } e. _V )
Theorem	bj-inex 17104	The intersection of two sets is a set, from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-intexr 17105	intexr 4286 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( |^| A e. _V -> A =/= (/) )
Theorem	bj-intnexr 17106	intnexr 4287 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( |^| A = _V -> -. |^| A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-zfpair2 17107	Proof of zfpair2 4347 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- { x , y } e. _V
Theorem	bj-prexg 17108	Proof of prexg 4349 using only bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> { A , B } e. _V )
Theorem	bj-snexg 17109	snexg 4321 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } e. _V )
Theorem	bj-snex 17110	snex 4322 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } e. _V
Theorem	bj-sels 17111*	If a class is a set, then it is a member of a set. (Copied from set.mm.) (Contributed by BJ, 3-Apr-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> E. x A e. x )
Theorem	bj-axun2 17112*	axun2 4580 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- E. y A. z ( z e. y <-> E. w ( z e. w /\ w e. x ) )
Theorem	bj-uniex2 17113*	uniex2 4581 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- E. y y = U. x
Theorem	bj-uniex 17114	uniex 4583 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- U. A e. _V
Theorem	bj-uniexg 17115	uniexg 4585 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> U. A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-unex 17116	unex 4587 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A u. B ) e. _V
Theorem	bdunexb 17117	Bounded version of unexb 4588. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED B   =>    |- ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) <-> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-unexg 17118	unexg 4589 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	bj-sucexg 17119	sucexg 4645 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> suc A e. _V )
Theorem	bj-sucex 17120	sucex 4646 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- suc A e. _V
14.3.9.1  Delta_0-classical logic
Axiom	ax-bj-d0cl 17121	Axiom for Δ0-classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- DECID ph
Theorem	bj-d0clsepcl 17122	Δ0-classical logic and separation implies classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- DECID ph
14.3.9.2  Inductive classes and the class of natural number ordinals
Syntax	wind 17123	Syntax for inductive classes.
wff Ind A
Definition	df-bj-ind 17124*	Define the property of being an inductive class. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- (Ind A <-> ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-indsuc 17125	A direct consequence of the definition of Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- (Ind A -> ( B e. A -> suc B e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-indeq 17126	Equality property for Ind. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- ( A = B -> (Ind A <-> Ind B ) )
Theorem	bj-bdind 17127	Boundedness of the formula "the setvar x is an inductive class". (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED Ind x
Theorem	bj-indint 17128*	The property of being an inductive class is closed under intersections. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- Ind |^| { x e. A | Ind x }
Theorem	bj-indind 17129*	If A is inductive and B is "inductive in A " (a condition weaker than "inductive"), then ( A i^i B ) is inductive. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Oct-2020.)
|- ( (Ind A /\ ( (/) e. B /\ A. x e. A ( x e. B -> suc x e. B ) ) ) -> Ind ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	bj-dfom 17130	Alternate definition of om, as the intersection of all the inductive sets. Proposal: make this the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- om = |^| { x | Ind x }
Theorem	bj-omind 17131	om is an inductive class. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.)
|- Ind om
Theorem	bj-omssind 17132	om is included in all the inductive sets (but for the moment, we cannot prove that it is included in all the inductive classes). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> (Ind A -> om C_ A ) )
Theorem	bj-ssom 17133*	A characterization of subclasses of om. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x (Ind x -> A C_ x ) <-> A C_ om )
Theorem	bj-om 17134*	A set is equal to om if and only if it is the smallest inductive set. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = om <-> (Ind A /\ A. x (Ind x -> A C_ x ) ) ) )
Theorem	bj-2inf 17135*	Two formulations of the axiom of infinity (see ax-infvn 17138 and bj-omex 17139) . (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( om e. _V <-> E. x (Ind x /\ A. y (Ind y -> x C_ y ) ) )
14.3.9.3  The first three Peano postulates The first three Peano postulates follow from constructive set theory (actually, from its core axioms). The proofs peano1 4741 and peano3 4743 already show this. In this section, we prove bj-peano2 17136 to complete this program. We also prove a preliminary version of the fifth Peano postulate from the core axioms.
Theorem	bj-peano2 17136	Constructive proof of peano2 4742. Temporary note: another possibility is to simply replace sucexg 4645 with bj-sucexg 17119 in the proof of peano2 4742. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> suc A e. om )
Theorem	peano5set 17137*	Version of peano5 4745 when om i^i A is assumed to be a set, allowing a proof from the core axioms of CZF. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( om i^i A ) e. V -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A ) )
14.3.10  CZF: Infinity In the absence of full separation, the axiom of infinity has to be stated more precisely, as the existence of the smallest class containing the empty set and the successor of each of its elements.
14.3.10.1  The set of natural number ordinals In this section, we introduce the axiom of infinity in a constructive setting (ax-infvn 17138) and deduce that the class om of natural number ordinals is a set (bj-omex 17139).
Axiom	ax-infvn 17138*	Axiom of infinity in a constructive setting. This asserts the existence of the special set we want (the set of natural numbers), instead of the existence of a set with some properties (ax-iinf 4735) from which one then proves, using full separation, that the wanted set exists (omex 4740). "vn" is for "von Neumann". (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.)
|- E. x (Ind x /\ A. y (Ind y -> x C_ y ) )
Theorem	bj-omex 17139	Proof of omex 4740 from ax-infvn 17138. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- om e. _V
14.3.10.2  Peano's fifth postulate In this section, we give constructive proofs of two versions of Peano's fifth postulate.
Theorem	bdpeano5 17140*	Bounded version of peano5 4745. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
Theorem	speano5 17141*	Version of peano5 4745 when A is assumed to be a set, allowing a proof from the core axioms of CZF. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
14.3.10.3  Bounded induction and Peano's fourth postulate In this section, we prove various versions of bounded induction from the basic axioms of CZF (in particular, without the axiom of set induction). We also prove Peano's fourth postulate. Together with the results from the previous sections, this proves from the core axioms of CZF (with infinity) that the set of natural number ordinals satisfies the five Peano postulates and thus provides a model for the set of natural numbers.
Theorem	findset 17142*	Bounded induction (principle of induction when A is assumed to be a set) allowing a proof from basic constructive axioms. See find 4746 for a nonconstructive proof of the general case. See bdfind 17143 for a proof when A is assumed to be bounded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) -> A = om ) )
Theorem	bdfind 17143*	Bounded induction (principle of induction when A is assumed to be bounded), proved from basic constructive axioms. See find 4746 for a nonconstructive proof of the general case. See findset 17142 for a proof when A is assumed to be a set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A ) -> A = om )
Theorem	bj-bdfindis 17144*	Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See finds 4747 for a proof of full induction in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove bounded versions of finds 4747, finds2 4748, finds1 4749. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-bdfindisg 17145*	Version of bj-bdfindis 17144 using a class term in the consequent. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-bdfindis 17144 for explanations. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ta   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> ( A e. om -> ta ) )
Theorem	bj-bdfindes 17146	Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-bdfindis 17144 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove the bounded version of findes 4750. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-nn0suc0 17147*	Constructive proof of a variant of nn0suc 4751. For a constructive proof of nn0suc 4751, see bj-nn0suc 17161. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. A A = suc x ) )
Theorem	bj-nntrans 17148	A natural number is a transitive set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	bj-nntrans2 17149	A natural number is a transitive set. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> Tr A )
Theorem	bj-nnelirr 17150	A natural number does not belong to itself. Version of elirr 4688 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4684. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> -. A e. A )
Theorem	bj-nnen2lp 17151	A version of en2lp 4701 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4684. Note: using this theorem and bj-nnelirr 17150, one can remove dependency on ax-setind 4684 from nntri2 6767 and nndcel 6773; one can actually remove more dependencies from these. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> -. ( A e. B /\ B e. A ) )
Theorem	bj-peano4 17152	Remove from peano4 4744 dependency on ax-setind 4684. Therefore, it only requires core constructive axioms (albeit more of them). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	bj-omtrans 17153	The set om is transitive. A natural number is included in om. Constructive proof of elomssom 4752. The idea is to use bounded induction with the formula x C_ om. This formula, in a logic with terms, is bounded. So in our logic without terms, we need to temporarily replace it with x C_ a and then deduce the original claim. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )
Theorem	bj-omtrans2 17154	The set om is transitive. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- Tr om
Theorem	bj-nnord 17155	A natural number is an ordinal class. Constructive proof of nnord 4759. Can also be proved from bj-nnelon 17156 if the latter is proved from bj-omssonALT 17160. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> Ord A )
Theorem	bj-nnelon 17156	A natural number is an ordinal. Constructive proof of nnon 4757. Can also be proved from bj-omssonALT 17160. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. On )
Theorem	bj-omord 17157	The set om is an ordinal class. Constructive proof of ordom 4754. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- Ord om
Theorem	bj-omelon 17158	The set om is an ordinal. Constructive proof of omelon 4756. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- om e. On
Theorem	bj-omsson 17159	Constructive proof of omsson 4760. See also bj-omssonALT 17160. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.
|- om C_ On
Theorem	bj-omssonALT 17160	Alternate proof of bj-omsson 17159. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om C_ On
Theorem	bj-nn0suc 17161*	Proof of (biconditional form of) nn0suc 4751 from the core axioms of CZF. See also bj-nn0sucALT 17175. As a characterization of the elements of om, this could be labeled "elom". (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om <-> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
14.3.11  CZF: Set induction In this section, we add the axiom of set induction to the core axioms of CZF.
14.3.11.1  Set induction In this section, we prove some variants of the axiom of set induction.
Theorem	setindft 17162*	Axiom of set-induction with a disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- ( A. x F/ y ph -> ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	setindf 17163*	Axiom of set-induction with a disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( A. x ( A. y e. x [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) -> A. x ph )
Theorem	setindis 17164*	Axiom of set induction using implicit substitutions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ch -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A. y ( A. z e. y ps -> ch ) -> A. x ph )
Axiom	ax-bdsetind 17165*	Axiom of bounded set induction. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.)
|- BOUNDED ph   =>    |- ( A. a ( A. y e. a [ y / a ] ph -> ph ) -> A. a ph )
Theorem	bdsetindis 17166*	Axiom of bounded set induction using implicit substitutions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ch -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A. y ( A. z e. y ps -> ch ) -> A. x ph )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem1 17167*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn 17171. Remark: unoptimized proof (have to use more deduction style). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> Ind A )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem2 17168*	Lemma for bj-inf2vnlem3 17169 and bj-inf2vnlem4 17170. Remark: unoptimized proof (have to use more deduction style). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A. u ( A. t e. u ( t e. A -> t e. Z ) -> ( u e. A -> u e. Z ) ) ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem3 17169*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn 17171. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   &    |- BOUNDED Z   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A C_ Z ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vnlem4 17170*	Lemma for bj-inf2vn2 17172. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) -> (Ind Z -> A C_ Z ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vn 17171*	A sufficient condition for om to be a set. See bj-inf2vn2 17172 for the unbounded version from full set induction. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- BOUNDED A   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> A = om ) )
Theorem	bj-inf2vn2 17172*	A sufficient condition for om to be a set; unbounded version of bj-inf2vn 17171. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x e. A <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. A x = suc y ) ) -> A = om ) )
Axiom	ax-inf2 17173*	Another axiom of infinity in a constructive setting (see ax-infvn 17138). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Nov-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x = (/) \/ E. y e. a x = suc y ) )
Theorem	bj-omex2 17174	Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, om is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 17138 (see bj-2inf 17135 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 17139). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- om e. _V
Theorem	bj-nn0sucALT 17175*	Alternate proof of bj-nn0suc 17161, also constructive but from ax-inf2 17173, hence requiring ax-bdsetind 17165. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. om <-> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
14.3.11.2  Full induction In this section, using the axiom of set induction, we prove full induction on the set of natural numbers.
Theorem	bj-findis 17176*	Principle of induction, using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See bj-bdfindis 17144 for a bounded version not requiring ax-setind 4684. See finds 4747 for a proof in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove of finds 4747, finds2 4748, finds1 4749. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
Theorem	bj-findisg 17177*	Version of bj-findis 17176 using a class term in the consequent. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 17176 for explanations. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ x th   &    |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ta   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ta ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> ( A e. om -> ta ) )
Theorem	bj-findes 17178	Principle of induction, using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 17176 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove findes 4750. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
14.3.12  CZF: Strong collection In this section, we state the axiom scheme of strong collection, which is part of CZF set theory.
Axiom	ax-strcoll 17179*	Axiom scheme of strong collection. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. The antecedent means that ph represents a multivalued function on a, or equivalently a collection of nonempty classes indexed by a, and the axiom asserts the existence of a set b which "collects" at least one element in the image of each x e. a and which is made only of such elements. That second conjunct is what makes it "strong", compared to the axiom scheme of collection ax-coll 4246. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- A. a ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcoll2 17180*	Version of ax-strcoll 17179 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcollnft 17181*	Closed form of strcollnf 17182. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Oct-2019.)
|- ( A. x A. y F/ b ph -> ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) ) )
Theorem	strcollnf 17182*	Version of ax-strcoll 17179 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. Version of strcoll2 17180 with the disjoint variable condition on b , ph replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis. This proof aims to demonstrate a standard technique, but strcoll2 17180 will generally suffice: since the theorem asserts the existence of a set b, supposing that that setvar does not occur in the already defined ph is not a big constraint. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Oct-2019.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	strcollnfALT 17183*	Alternate proof of strcollnf 17182, not using strcollnft 17181. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- F/ b ph   =>    |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )
14.3.13  CZF: Subset collection In this section, we state the axiom scheme of subset collection, which is part of CZF set theory.
Axiom	ax-sscoll 17184*	Axiom scheme of subset collection. It is stated with all possible disjoint variable conditions, to show that this weak form is sufficient. The antecedent means that ph represents a multivalued function from a to b, or equivalently a collection of nonempty subsets of b indexed by a, and the consequent asserts the existence of a subset of c which "collects" at least one element in the image of each x e. a and which is made only of such elements. The axiom asserts the existence, for any sets a , b, of a set c such that that implication holds for any value of the parameter z of ph. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- A. a A. b E. c A. z ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph -> E. d e. c ( A. x e. a E. y e. d ph /\ A. y e. d E. x e. a ph ) )
Theorem	sscoll2 17185*	Version of ax-sscoll 17184 with two disjoint variable conditions removed and without initial universal quantifiers. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)
|- E. c A. z ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph -> E. d e. c ( A. x e. a E. y e. d ph /\ A. y e. d E. x e. a ph ) )
14.3.14  Real numbers
Axiom	ax-ddkcomp 17186	Axiom of Dedekind completeness for Dedekind real numbers: every inhabited upper-bounded located set of reals has a real upper bound. Ideally, this axiom should be "proved" as "axddkcomp" for the real numbers constructed from IZF, and then Axiom ax-ddkcomp 17186 should be used in place of construction specific results. In particular, axcaucvg 8268 should be proved from it. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Oct-2021.)
|- ( ( ( A C_ RR /\ E. x x e. A ) /\ E. x e. RR A. y e. A y < x /\ A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x < y -> ( E. z e. A x < z \/ A. z e. A z < y ) ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. A y <_ x /\ ( ( B e. R /\ A. y e. A y <_ B ) -> x <_ B ) ) )
14.4  Mathbox for Jim Kingdon
14.4.1  Propositional and predicate logic
Theorem	nnnotnotr 17187	Double negation of double negation elimination. Suggested by an online post by Martin Escardo. Although this statement resembles nnexmid 862, it can be proved with reference only to implication and negation (that is, without use of disjunction). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Oct-2024.)
|- -. -. ( -. -. ph -> ph )
14.4.2  The sizes of sets
Theorem	ss1oel2o 17188	Any subset of ordinal one being an element of ordinal two is equivalent to excluded middle. A variation of exmid01 4335 which more directly illustrates the contrast with el2oss1o 6716. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ 1o -> x e. 2o ) )
Theorem	3dom 17189*	A set that dominates ordinal 3 has at least 3 different members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2026.)
|- ( 3o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A E. z e. A ( x =/= y /\ x =/= z /\ y =/= z ) )
Theorem	pw1ndom3lem 17190	Lemma for pw1ndom3 17191. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- ( ph -> X e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> Y e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> Z e. ~P 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> X =/= Y )   &    |- ( ph -> X =/= Z )   &    |- ( ph -> Y =/= Z )   =>    |- ( ph -> X = (/) )
Theorem	pw1ndom3 17191	The powerset of 1o does not dominate 3o. This is another way of saying that ~P 1o does not have three elements (like pwntru 4336). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen and Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- -. 3o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ninf 17192	The powerset of 1o is not infinite. Since we cannot prove it is finite (see pw1fin 7217), this provides a concrete example of a set which we cannot show to be finite or infinite, as seen another way at inffiexmid 7213. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
|- -. om ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	nnti 17193	Ordering on a natural number generates a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. om )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. A /\ v e. A ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u _E v /\ -. v _E u ) ) )
Theorem	012of 17194	Mapping zero and one between NN0 and om style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   =>    |- ( `' G |` { 0 , 1 } ) : { 0 , 1 } --> 2o
Theorem	2o01f 17195	Mapping zero and one between om and NN0 style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   =>    |- ( G |` 2o ) : 2o --> { 0 , 1 }
Theorem	pw1map 17196*	Mapping between ( ~P 1o ^m A ) and subsets of A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2026.)
|- F = ( s e. ( ~P 1o ^m A ) |-> { z e. A | ( s ` z ) = 1o } )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> F : ( ~P 1o ^m A ) -1-1-onto-> ~P A )
Theorem	pw1mapen 17197	Equinumerosity of ( ~P 1o ^m A ) and the set of subsets of A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( ~P 1o ^m A ) ~~ ~P A )
14.4.3  The power set of a singleton
Theorem	pwtrufal 17198	A subset of the singleton { (/) } cannot be anything other than (/) or { (/) }. Removing the double negation would change the meaning, as seen at exmid01 4335. If we view a subset of a singleton as a truth value (as seen in theorems like exmidexmid 4333), then this theorem states there are no truth values other than true and false, as described in section 1.1 of [Bauer], p. 481. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2023.)
|- ( A C_ { (/) } -> -. -. ( A = (/) \/ A = { (/) } ) )
Theorem	pwle2 17199*	An exercise related to N copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
|- T = U_ x e. N ( { x } X. 1o )   =>    |- ( ( N e. om /\ G : T -1-1-> ~P 1o ) -> N C_ 2o )
Theorem	pwf1oexmid 17200*	An exercise related to N copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
|- T = U_ x e. N ( { x } X. 1o )   =>    |- ( ( N e. om /\ G : T -1-1-> ~P 1o ) -> ( ran G = ~P 1o <-> ( N = 2o /\ EXMID ) ) )