P. 173 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17201-17300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cshwshashnsame 17201*	If a word (not consisting of identical symbols) has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → (∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0) → (♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cshwshash 17202*	If a word has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word or 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → ((♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊) ∨ (♯‘𝑀) = 1))
6.2.19  Specific prime numbers
Theorem	prmlem0 17203*	Lemma for prmlem1a 17204 and prmlem2 17218. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℙ → ¬ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝐾 + 2) = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	prmlem1a 17204*	Lemma for prmlem1 17205 and prmlem2 17218. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 5 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘5)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem1 17205	A quick proof skeleton to show that the numbers less than 25 are prime, by trial division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;25    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	5prm 17206	5 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	6nprm 17207	6 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 6 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	7prm 17208	7 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 7 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	8nprm 17209	8 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 8 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	9nprm 17210	9 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 9 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	10nprm 17211	10 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Sep-2021.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ¬ ;10 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	10nprmOLD 17212	Obsolete version of 10nprm 17211 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Sep-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ;10 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	11prm 17213	11 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;11 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	13prm 17214	13 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;13 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	17prm 17215	17 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;17 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	19prm 17216	19 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;19 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	23prm 17217	23 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;23 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem2 17218	Our last proving session got as far as 25 because we started with the two "bootstrap" primes 2 and 3, and the next prime is 5, so knowing that 2 and 3 are prime and 4 is not allows to cover the numbers less than 5↑2 = 25. Additionally, nonprimes are "easy", so we can extend this range of known prime/nonprimes all the way until 29, which is the first prime larger than 25. Thus, in this lemma we extend another blanket out to 29↑2 = 841, from which we can prove even more primes. If we wanted, we could keep doing this, but the goal is Bertrand's postulate, and for that we only need a few large primes - we don't need to find them all, as we have been doing thus far. So after this blanket runs out, we'll have to switch to another method (see 1259prm 17234). As a side note, you can see the pattern of the primes in the indentation pattern of this lemma! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;;841    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 7 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;11 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;13 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;17 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;19 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;23 ∥ 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	37prm 17219	37 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;37 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	43prm 17220	43 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;43 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	83prm 17221	83 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;83 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	139prm 17222	139 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;139 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	163prm 17223	163 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;163 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	317prm 17224	317 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;317 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	631prm 17225	631 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;631 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmo4 17226	The primorial of 4. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘4) = 6
Theorem	prmo5 17227	The primorial of 5. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘5) = ;30
Theorem	prmo6 17228	The primorial of 6. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘6) = ;30
6.2.20  Very large primes
Theorem	1259lem1 17229	Lemma for 1259prm 17234. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑16 = 52𝑁 + 68≡68 and 2↑17≡68 · 2 = 136 in this lemma. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;17) mod 𝑁) = (;;136 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem2 17230	Lemma for 1259prm 17234. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑34 = (2↑17)↑2≡136↑2≡14𝑁 + 870. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;34) mod 𝑁) = (;;870 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem3 17231	Lemma for 1259prm 17234. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑38 = 2↑34 · 2↑4≡870 · 16 = 11𝑁 + 71 and 2↑76 = (2↑34)↑2≡71↑2 = 4𝑁 + 5≡5. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;76) mod 𝑁) = (5 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem4 17232	Lemma for 1259prm 17234. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑306 = (2↑76)↑4 · 4≡5↑4 · 4 = 2𝑁 − 18, 2↑612 = (2↑306)↑2≡18↑2 = 324, 2↑629 = 2↑612 · 2↑17≡324 · 136 = 35𝑁 − 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑629)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem5 17233	Lemma for 1259prm 17234. Calculate the GCD of 2↑34 − 1≡869 with 𝑁 = 1259. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;34) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	1259prm 17234	1259 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	2503lem1 17235	Lemma for 2503prm 17238. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑18 = 512↑2 = 104𝑁 + 1832≡1832. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;18) mod 𝑁) = (;;;1832 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem2 17236	Lemma for 2503prm 17238. Calculate a power mod. We calculate 2↑19 = 2↑18 · 2≡1832 · 2 = 𝑁 + 1161, 2↑38 = (2↑19)↑2≡1161↑2 = 538𝑁 + 1307, 2↑39 = 2↑38 · 2≡1307 · 2 = 𝑁 + 111, 2↑78 = (2↑39)↑2≡111↑2 = 5𝑁 − 194, 2↑156 = (2↑78)↑2≡194↑2 = 15𝑁 + 91, 2↑312 = (2↑156)↑2≡91↑2 = 3𝑁 + 772, 2↑624 = (2↑312)↑2≡772↑2 = 238𝑁 + 270, 2↑1248 = (2↑624)↑2≡270↑2 = 29𝑁 + 313, 2↑1251 = 2↑1248 · 8≡313 · 8 = 𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1251)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem3 17237	Lemma for 2503prm 17238. Calculate the GCD of 2↑18 − 1≡1831 with 𝑁 = 2503. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;18) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	2503prm 17238	2503 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	4001lem1 17239	Lemma for 4001prm 17243. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑12 = 4096 = 𝑁 + 95, 2↑24 = (2↑12)↑2≡95↑2 = 2𝑁 + 1023, 2↑25 = 2↑24 · 2≡1023 · 2 = 2046, 2↑50 = (2↑25)↑2≡2046↑2 = 1046𝑁 + 1070, 2↑100 = (2↑50)↑2≡1070↑2 = 286𝑁 + 614 and 2↑200 = (2↑100)↑2≡614↑2 = 94𝑁 + 902 ≡902. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;200) mod 𝑁) = (;;902 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem2 17240	Lemma for 4001prm 17243. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑400 = (2↑200)↑2≡902↑2 = 203𝑁 + 1401 and 2↑800 = (2↑400)↑2≡1401↑2 = 490𝑁 + 2311 ≡2311. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;800) mod 𝑁) = (;;;2311 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem3 17241	Lemma for 4001prm 17243. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑1000 = 2↑800 · 2↑200≡2311 · 902 = 521𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1000)↑4≡1↑4 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem4 17242	Lemma for 4001prm 17243. Calculate the GCD of 2↑800 − 1≡2310 with 𝑁 = 4001. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;;800) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	4001prm 17243	4001 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
PART 7  BASIC STRUCTURES
7.1  Extensible structures
7.1.1  Basic definitions An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit. An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs) on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of ℕ. The function's argument is the index of a structure component (such as 1 for the base set of a group), and its value is the component (such as the base set). By convention, we normally avoid direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index and instead use structure component extractors such as ndxid 17295 and strfv 17301. Using extractors makes it easier to change numeric indices and also makes the components' purpose clearer. For example, as noted in ndxid 17295, we can refer to a specific poset with base set 𝐵 and order relation 𝐿 using the extensible structure {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), 𝐿⟩} rather than {⟨1, 𝐵⟩, ⟨;10, 𝐿⟩}. See section header comment mmtheorems.html#cnx 17295 for more details on numeric indices versus the structure component extractors. There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden" arguments; Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs that an 𝑋 is a 𝑌 via a bunch of forgetful functors) can cause serious performance problems for automated tooling, and the resulting proofs would be painful to look at directly (in the case of Lean, they are long past the level where people would find it acceptable to look at them directly). Metamath is working under much stricter conditions than this, and it has still managed to achieve about the same level of flexibility through this "extensible structure" approach. To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures ↾s as defined in df-ress 17329. This can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone. Individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior by ignoring operators' values outside the range (like Ring), defining a function using the base set and applying that (like TopGrp), or explicitly truncating the slot before use (like MetSp). For example, the unital ring of integers ℤring is defined in df-zring 21666 as simply ℤring = (ℂfld ↾s ℤ). This can be similarly done for all other subsets of ℂ, which has all the structure we can show applies to it, and this all comes "for free". Should we come up with some new structure in the future that we wish ℂ to inherit, then we change the definition of ℂfld, reprove all the slot extraction theorems, add a new one, and that's it. None of the other downstream theorems have to change. Note that the construct of df-prds 17538 addresses a different situation. It is not possible to have SubGrp and SubRing be the same thing because they produce different outputs on the same input. The subgroups of an extensible structure treated as a group are not the same as the subrings of that same structure. With df-prds 17538 it can actually reasonably perform the task, that is, being the product group given a family of groups, while also being the product ring given a family of rings. There is no contradiction here because the group part of a product ring is a product group. There is also a general theory of "substructure algebras", in the form of df-mre 17676 and df-acs 17679. SubGrp is a Moore collection, as is SubRing, SubRng and many other substructure collections. But it is not useful for picking out a particular collection of interest; SubRing and SubGrp still need to be defined and they are distinct --- nothing is going to select these definitions for us. Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization.
7.1.1.1  Extensible structures as structures with components
Syntax	cstr 17244	Extend class notation with the class of structures with components numbered below 𝐴.
class Struct
Definition	df-struct 17245*	Define a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. This is not a requirement for groups, posets, etc., but it is a useful assumption for component extraction theorems. As mentioned in the section header, an "extensible structure should be implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)". The current definition, however, is less restrictive: it allows for classes which contain the empty set ∅ to be extensible structures. Because of 0nelfun 6555, such classes cannot be functions. Without the empty set, however, a structure must be a function, see structn0fun 17249: 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}). Allowing an extensible structure to contain the empty set ensures that expressions like {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} are structures without asserting or implying that 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 are sets (if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class, then ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅, see opprc 4859). This is used critically in strle1 17256, strle2 17257, strle3 17258 and strleun 17255 to avoid sethood hypotheses on the "payload" sets: without this, ipsstr 17427 and theorems like it will have many sethood assumptions, and may not even be usable in the empty context. Instead, the sethood assumption is deferred until it is actually needed, e.g., ipsbase 17428, which requires that the base set be a set but not any of the other components. Usually, a concrete structure like ℂfld does not contain the empty set, and therefore is a function, see cnfldfun 21605. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Struct = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝑓 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝑓 ⊆ (...‘𝑥))}
Theorem	brstruct 17246	The structure relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Rel Struct
Theorem	isstruct2 17247	The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋)))
Theorem	structex 17248	A structure is a set. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 Struct 𝑋 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	structn0fun 17249	A structure without the empty set is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	isstruct 17250	The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩ ↔ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	structcnvcnv 17251	Two ways to express the relational part of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → ◡◡𝐹 = (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	structfung 17252	The converse of the converse of a structure is a function. Closed form of structfun 17253. (Contributed by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun ◡◡𝐹)
Theorem	structfun 17253	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct 𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝐹
Theorem	structfn 17254	Convert between two kinds of structure closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (1...𝑁))
Theorem	strleun 17255	Combine two structures into one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 Struct ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐵 < 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩
Theorem	strle1 17256	Make a structure from a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐼⟩
Theorem	strle2 17257	Make a structure from a pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐼 < 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝑌⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐽⟩
Theorem	strle3 17258	Make a structure from a triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐼 < 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐽 < 𝐾    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐾    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝑌⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝑍⟩} Struct ⟨𝐼, 𝐾⟩
Theorem	sbcie2s 17259*	A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) (Revised by SN, 2-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	sbcie3s 17260*	A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏][(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
7.1.1.2  Substitution of components
Syntax	csts 17261	Set components of a structure.
class sSet
Definition	df-sets 17262*	Set a component of an extensible structure. This function is useful for taking an existing structure and "overriding" one of its components. For example, df-ress 17329 adjusts the base set to match its second argument, which has the effect of making subgroups, subspaces, subrings etc. from the original structures. Or df-mgp 20280, which takes a ring and overrides its addition operation with the multiplicative operation, so that we can consider the "multiplicative group" using group and monoid theorems, which expect the operation to be in the +g slot instead of the .r slot. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ sSet = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝑒})) ∪ {𝑒}))
Theorem	reldmsets 17263	The structure override operator is a proper operator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Rel dom sSet
Theorem	setsvalg 17264	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ dom {𝐴})) ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	setsval 17265	Value of the structure replacement function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	fvsetsid 17266	The value of the structure replacement function for its first argument is its second argument. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈) → ((𝐹 sSet ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)‘𝑋) = 𝑌)
Theorem	fsets 17267	The structure replacement function is a function. (Contributed by SO, 12-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹 sSet ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	setsdm 17268	The domain of a structure with replacement is the domain of the original structure extended by the index of the replacement. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → dom (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) = (dom 𝐺 ∪ {𝐼}))
Theorem	setsfun 17269	A structure with replacement is a function if the original structure is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩))
Theorem	setsfun0 17270	A structure with replacement without the empty set is a function if the original structure without the empty set is a function. This variant of setsfun 17269 is useful for proofs based on isstruct2 17247 which requires Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) for 𝐹 to be an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅})) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)) → Fun ((𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsn0fun 17271	The value of the structure replacement function (without the empty set) is a function if the structure (without the empty set) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Struct 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	setsstruct2 17272	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 Struct 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝑌 = ⟨if(𝐼 ≤ (1st ‘𝑋), 𝐼, (1st ‘𝑋)), if(𝐼 ≤ (2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑋), 𝐼)⟩) → (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct 𝑌)
Theorem	setsexstruct2 17273*	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Struct 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑦(𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct 𝑦)
Theorem	setsstruct 17274	An extensible structure with a replaced slot is an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐺 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩) → (𝐺 sSet ⟨𝐼, 𝐸⟩) Struct ⟨𝑀, if(𝐼 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝐼)⟩)
Theorem	wunsets 17275	Closure of structure replacement in a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 sSet 𝐴) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	setsres 17276	The structure replacement function does not affect the value of 𝑆 away from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})) = (𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {𝐴})))
Theorem	setsabs 17277	Replacing the same components twice yields the same as the second setting only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	setscom 17278	Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) = ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
7.1.1.3  Slots
Syntax	cslot 17279	Extend class notation with the slot function.
class Slot 𝐴
Definition	df-slot 17280*	Define the slot extractor for extensible structures. The class Slot 𝐴 is a function whose argument can be any set, although it is meaningful only if that set is a member of an extensible structure (such as a partially ordered set (df-poset 18407) or a group (df-grp 19066)). Note that Slot 𝐴 is implemented as "evaluation at 𝐴". That is, (Slot 𝐴‘𝑆) is defined to be (𝑆‘𝐴), where 𝐴 will typically be an index (which is implemented as a small natural number) of a component of an extensible structure 𝑆. Each extensible structure is a function defined on specific (natural number) "slots", and the function Slot 𝐴 extracts the structure's component as a function value at a particular slot (with index 𝐴). The special "structure" ndx, defined as the identity function restricted to ℕ, can be used to extract the number 𝐴 from a slot, since (Slot 𝐴‘ndx) = 𝐴 (see ndxarg 17294). This is typically used to refer to the number of a slot when defining structures without having to expose the detail of what that number is (for instance, we use the expression (Base‘ndx) in theorems and proofs instead of its hard-coded, numeric value 1), and discourage using the specific definition of slot extractors like Base = Slot 1 (see df-base 17308). Actually, these definitions are used in two basic theorems named *id (theorems of the form 𝐶 = Slot (𝐶‘ndx)) and *ndx (theorems of the form (𝐶‘ndx) = 𝑁) only (see, for example, baseid 17310 and basendx 17316), except additionally in the discouraged theorem baseval 17309 to demonstrate the representations of the value of the base set extractor. The *id theorems are implementation independent equivalents of the definitions by the means of ndxid 17295, but the *ndx theorems still depend on the hard-coded values of the indices. Therefore, the usage of these *ndx theorems is also discouraged (for more details see the section header comment mmtheorems.html#cnx 17295). Example: The group operation is the second component, i.e., the component in the second slot, of a group-like structure 𝐺 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), + ⟩}. The slot extractor +g = Slot 2 (see df-plusg 17361) applied on the structure 𝐺 provides the group operation + = (+g‘𝐺). Expanding the definitions, we get + = (Slot 2‘𝐺) = (𝐺‘2) = (𝐺‘(+g‘ndx)) (for the last equation, see plusgndx 17374). The class Slot cannot be defined as (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓‘𝑥))) because each Slot 𝐴 is a function on the proper class V so is itself a proper class, and the values of functions are sets (fvex 6895). It is necessary to allow proper classes as values of Slot 𝐴 since for instance the class of all (base sets of) groups is proper. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Slot 𝐴 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥‘𝐴))
Theorem	sloteq 17281	Equality theorem for the Slot construction. The converse holds if 𝐴 (or 𝐵) is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Slot 𝐴 = Slot 𝐵)
Theorem	slotfn 17282	A slot is a function on sets, treated as structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 Fn V
Theorem	strfvnd 17283	Deduction version of strfvn 17284. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁))
Theorem	strfvn 17284	Value of a structure component extractor 𝐸. Normally, 𝐸 is a defined constant symbol such as Base (df-base 17308) and 𝑁 is the index of the component. 𝑆 is a structure, i.e. a specific member of a class of structures such as Poset (df-poset 18407) where 𝑆 ∈ Poset. Hint: Do not substitute 𝑁 by a specific (positive) integer to be independent of a hard-coded index value. Often, (𝐸‘ndx) can be used instead of 𝑁. Alternatively, use strfv 17301 instead of strfvn 17284. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝑆‘𝑁)
Theorem	strfvss 17285	A structure component extractor produces a value which is contained in a set dependent on 𝑆, but not 𝐸. This is sometimes useful for showing sethood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) ⊆ ∪ ran 𝑆
Theorem	wunstr 17286	Closure of a structure index in a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	str0 17287	All components of the empty set are empty sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = Slot 𝐼    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ = (𝐹‘∅)
Theorem	strfvi 17288	Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
Theorem	fveqprc 17289	Lemma for showing the equality of values for functions like slot extractors 𝐸 at a proper class. Extracted from several former proofs of lemmas like zlmlem 21735. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐸‘∅) = ∅    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐹‘𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘𝑌))
Theorem	oveqprc 17290	Lemma for showing the equality of values for functions like slot extractors 𝐸 at a proper class. Extracted from several former proofs of lemmas like resvlem 33781. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐸‘∅) = ∅    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑋𝑂𝑌)    &   ⊢ Rel dom 𝑂    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑋) = (𝐸‘𝑍))
7.1.1.4  Structure component indices The structure component index extractor ndx, defined in this subsection, is used to get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 17308 (see ndxarg 17294). For each defined structure component extractor, there should be a corresponding specific theorem providing its index, like basendx 17316. The usage of these theorems, however, is discouraged since the particular value for the index is an implementation detail. It is generally sufficient to work with (Base‘ndx) instead of the hard-coded index value, and use theorems such as baseid 17310 and basendxnplusgndx 17378. The main circumstance in which it is necessary to look at indices directly is when showing that a set of indices are disjoint (for example in proofs such as cznabel 49183, based on setsnid 17306) or even ordered (in proofs such as lmodstr 17416). The requirement that the indices are distinct is necessary for sets of ordered pairs to be extensible structures, whereas the ordering allows for proofs avoiding the usage of quadradically many inequalities (compare cnfldfun 21605 with cnfldfunALT 21606). As for the inequalities, it is recommended to provide them explicitly as theorems like basendxnplusgndx 17378, whenever they are required. Since these theorems use discouraged slot theorems, they should be placed near the definition of a slot (within the same subsection), so that the range of usages of discouraged theorems is tightly limited. Although there could be quadradically many of them in the total number of indices, much less are actually available (and not much more are expected). As for the ordering, there are some theorems like basendxltplusgndx 17377 providing the less-than relationship between two indices. These theorems are also proved by discouraged theorems, so they should be placed near the definition of a slot (within the same subsection), too. However, since such theorems are rarely used (in structure building theorems *str like rngstr 17389), it is not recommended to provide explicit theorems for all of them, but to use the (discouraged) *ndx theorems as in lmodstr 17416. Therefore, *str theorems generally depend on the hard-coded values of the indices.
Syntax	cnx 17291	Extend class notation with the structure component index extractor.
class ndx
Definition	df-ndx 17292	Define the structure component index extractor. See Theorem ndxarg 17294 to understand its purpose. The restriction to ℕ ensures that ndx is a set. The restriction to some set is necessary since I is a proper class. In principle, we could have chosen ℂ or (if we revise all structure component definitions such as df-base 17308) another set such as the set of finite ordinals ω (df-om 7867). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ndx = ( I ↾ ℕ)
Theorem	wunndx 17293	Closure of the index extractor in an infinite weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ndx ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	ndxarg 17294	Get the numeric argument from a defined structure component extractor such as df-base 17308. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) = 𝑁
Theorem	ndxid 17295	A structure component extractor is defined by its own index. This theorem, together with strfv 17301 below, is useful for avoiding direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index in component extractor definitions, such as the 1 in df-base 17308 and the ;10 in df-ple 17368, making it easier to change should the need arise. For example, we can refer to a specific poset with base set 𝐵 and order relation 𝐿 using {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), 𝐿⟩} rather than {⟨1, 𝐵⟩, ⟨;10, 𝐿⟩}. The latter, while shorter to state, requires revision if we later change ;10 to some other number, and it may also be harder to remember. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2013.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
Theorem	strndxid 17296	The value of a structure component extractor is the value of the corresponding slot of the structure. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) Use strfvnd 17283 directly with 𝑁 set to (𝐸‘ndx) if possible.
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘(𝐸‘ndx)) = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	setsidvald 17297	Value of the structure replacement function, deduction version. Hint: Do not substitute 𝑁 by a specific (positive) integer to be independent of a hard-coded index value. Often, (𝐸‘ndx) can be used instead of 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Revised by AV, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ dom 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝑁, (𝐸‘𝑆)⟩))
Theorem	strfvd 17298	Deduction version of strfv 17301. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strfv2d 17299	Deduction version of strfv2 17300. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))
Theorem	strfv2 17300	A variation on strfv 17301 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))