Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 5 of 465) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29221) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29222-30744) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30745-46443) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | iman 401 | Implication in terms of conjunction and negation. Theorem 3.4(27) of [Stoll] p. 176. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | pm3.24 402 | Law of noncontradiction. Theorem *3.24 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111 (who call it the "law of contradiction"). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | annim 403 | Express a conjunction in terms of a negated implication. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | pm4.61 404 | Theorem *4.61 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | pm4.65 405 | Theorem *4.65 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | imp 406 | Importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | impcom 407 | Importation inference with commuted antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | con3dimp 408 | Variant of con3d 152 with importation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → ¬ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | mpnanrd 409 | Eliminate the right side of a negated conjunction in an implication. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | impd 410 | Importation deduction. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | impcomd 411 | Importation deduction with commuted antecedents. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | ex 412 | Exportation inference. (This theorem used to be labeled "exp" but was changed to "ex" so as not to conflict with the math token "exp", per the June 2006 Metamath spec change.) A translation of natural deduction rule → I (→ introduction), see natded 28708. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | expcom 413 | Exportation inference with commuted antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | expdcom 414 | Commuted form of expd 415. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) Shorten expd 415. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | expd 415 | Exportation deduction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | expcomd 416 | Deduction form of expcom 413. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | imp31 417 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | imp32 418 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | exp31 419 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | exp32 420 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | imp4b 421 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) Shorten imp4a 422. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | imp4a 422 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))) | ||
Theorem | imp4c 423 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | imp4d 424 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | imp41 425 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | imp42 426 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | imp43 427 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | imp44 428 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | imp45 429 | An importation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | exp4b 430 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2012.) Shorten exp4a 431. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp4a 431 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp4c 432 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp4d 433 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp41 434 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp42 435 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp43 436 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp44 437 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | exp45 438 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | imp5d 439 | An importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | imp5a 440 | An importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)))) | ||
Theorem | imp5g 441 | An importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | imp55 442 | An importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | imp511 443 | An importation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | exp5c 444 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
Theorem | exp5j 445 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
Theorem | exp5l 446 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
Theorem | exp53 447 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 30-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.3 448 | Theorem *3.3 (Exp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.31 449 | Theorem *3.31 (Imp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | impexp 450 | Import-export theorem. Part of Theorem *4.87 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | impancom 451 | Mixed importation/commutation inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | expdimp 452 | A deduction version of exportation, followed by importation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2008.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | expimpd 453 | Exportation followed by a deduction version of importation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | impr 454 | Import a wff into a right conjunct. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 30-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | impl 455 | Export a wff from a left conjunct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | expr 456 | Export a wff from a right conjunct. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 30-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | expl 457 | Export a wff from a left conjunct. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | ancoms 458 | Inference commuting conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | pm3.22 459 | Theorem *3.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | ancom 460 | Commutative law for conjunction. Theorem *4.3 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | ancomd 461 | Commutation of conjuncts in consequent. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 14-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | biancomi 462 | Commuting conjunction in a biconditional. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | biancomd 463 | Commuting conjunction in a biconditional, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | ancomst 464 | Closed form of ancoms 458. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | ancomsd 465 | Deduction commuting conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | anasss 466 | Associative law for conjunction applied to antecedent (eliminates syllogism). (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | anassrs 467 | Associative law for conjunction applied to antecedent (eliminates syllogism). (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2002.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | anass 468 | Associative law for conjunction. Theorem *4.32 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.2 469 | Join antecedents with conjunction ("conjunction introduction"). Theorem *3.2 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111. Its associated inference is pm3.2i 470 and its associated deduction is jca 511 (and the double deduction is jcad 512). See pm3.2im 160 for a version using only implication and negation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.2i 470 | Infer conjunction of premises. Inference associated with pm3.2 469. Its associated deduction is jca 511 (and the double deduction is jcad 512). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | pm3.21 471 | Join antecedents with conjunction. Theorem *3.21 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.43i 472 | Nested conjunction of antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-1993.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | pm3.43 473 | Theorem *3.43 (Comp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | dfbi2 474 | A theorem similar to the standard definition of the biconditional. Definition of [Margaris] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | dfbi 475 | Definition df-bi 206 rewritten in an abbreviated form to help intuitive understanding of that definition. Note that it is a conjunction of two implications; one which asserts properties that follow from the biconditional and one which asserts properties that imply the biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2008.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝜑))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | biimpa 476 | Importation inference from a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | biimpar 477 | Importation inference from a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | biimpac 478 | Importation inference from a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | biimparc 479 | Importation inference from a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | adantr 480 | Inference adding a conjunct to the right of an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | adantl 481 | Inference adding a conjunct to the left of an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | simpl 482 | Elimination of a conjunct. Theorem *3.26 (Simp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | simpli 483 | Inference eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | simpr 484 | Elimination of a conjunct. Theorem *3.27 (Simp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | simpri 485 | Inference eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
Theorem | intnan 486 | Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | intnanr 487 | Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | intnand 488 | Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | intnanrd 489 | Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | adantld 490 | Deduction adding a conjunct to the left of an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Dec-2012.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | adantrd 491 | Deduction adding a conjunct to the right of an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | pm3.41 492 | Theorem *3.41 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | pm3.42 493 | Theorem *3.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | simpld 494 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. A translation of natural deduction rule ∧ EL (∧ elimination left), see natded 28708. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | simprd 495 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) A translation of natural deduction rule ∧ ER (∧ elimination right), see natded 28708. (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | simprbi 496 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | simplbi 497 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | simprbda 498 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2007.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | simplbda 499 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2007.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | simplbi2 500 | Deduction eliminating a conjunct. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |