P. 466 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 46501-46600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2 46501*	Lemma 2 for isomuspgr 46502. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) ∧ 𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒))))
Theorem	isomuspgr 46502*	The isomorphy relation for two simple pseudographs. This corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))))
Theorem	isomgrref 46503	The isomorphy relation is reflexive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐺)
Theorem	isomgrsym 46504	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 → 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrsymb 46505	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrtrlem 46506*	Lemma for isomgrtr 46507. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (((((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑓:(Vtx‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐵) ∧ 𝑣:(Vtx‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐶)) ∧ (𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))) ∧ (𝑤:dom (iEdg‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐶) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐵)(𝑣 “ ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘(𝑤‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑗 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)((𝑣 ∘ 𝑓) “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑗)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘((𝑤 ∘ 𝑔)‘𝑗)))
Theorem	isomgrtr 46507	The isomorphy relation is transitive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐶) → 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐶))
Theorem	strisomgrop 46508	A graph represented as an extensible structure with vertices as base set and indexed edges is isomorphic to a hypergraph represented as ordered pair with the same vertices and edges. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑉⟩, ⟨(.ef‘ndx), 𝐸⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
Theorem	ushrisomgr 46509	A simple hypergraph (with arbitrarily indexed edges) is isomorphic to a graph with the same vertices and the same edges, indexed by the edges themselves. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, ( I ↾ 𝐸)⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
21.45.15.2  Loop-free graphs - extension
Theorem	1hegrlfgr 46510*	A graph 𝐺 with one hyperedge joining at least two vertices is a loop-free graph. (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) = {⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺):{𝐴}⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
21.45.15.3  Walks - extension
Syntax	cupwlks 46511	Extend class notation with walks (of a pseudograph).
class UPWalks
Definition	df-upwlks 46512*	Define the set of all walks (in a pseudograph), called "simple walks" in the following. According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A walk of length k in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, v0 , e0 , v1 , e1 , v2 , ... , v(k-1) , e(k-1) , v(k) which begins and ends with vertices. If the graph is undirected, then the endpoints of e(i) are v(i) and v(i+1)." According to Bollobas: " A walk W in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges x0 , e1 , x1 , e2 , ... , e(l) , x(l) where e(i) = x(i-1)x(i), 0<i<=l.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 4. Therefore, a walk can be represented by two mappings f from { 1 , ... , n } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Although this definition is also applicable for arbitrary hypergraphs, it allows only walks consisting of not proper hyperedges (i.e. edges connecting at most two vertices). Therefore, it should be used for pseudographs only. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ UPWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	upwlksfval 46513*	The set of simple walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (UPWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐼‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	isupwlk 46514*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	isupwlkg 46515*	Generalization of isupwlk 46514: Conditions for two classes to represent a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upwlkbprop 46516	Basic properties of a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))
Theorem	upwlkwlk 46517	A simple walk is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlk 46518	In a pseudograph, a walk is a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) → 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlkb 46519	In a pseudograph, the definitions for a walk and a simple walk are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	upgrisupwlkALT 46520*	Alternate proof of upgriswlk 28898 using the definition of UPGraph and related theorems. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
21.45.15.4  Edges of graphs expressed as sets of unordered pairs
Theorem	upgredgssspr 46521	The set of edges of a pseudograph is a subset of the set of unordered pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (Pairs‘(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	uspgropssxp 46522*	The set 𝐺 of "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices is a subset of a Cartesian product. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 46532. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑊 × 𝑃))
Theorem	uspgrsprfv 46523*	The value of the function 𝐹 which maps a "simple pseudograph" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices to the set of edges (i.e. range of the edge function) of the graph. Solely for 𝐺 as defined here, the function 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" and the subsets of the set of pairs 𝑃 over the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices, see uspgrbispr 46529. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	uspgrsprf 46524*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺⟶𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprf1 46525*	The mapping 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺–1-1→𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprfo 46526*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 onto the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrsprf1o 46527*	The mapping 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. See also the comments on uspgrbisymrel 46532. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrex 46528*	The class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	uspgrbispr 46529*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrspren 46530*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑃 of subsets of the set of pairs over the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrymrelen 46531*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 46532. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrel 46532*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉. The simple pseudographs, which are graphs without hyper- or multiedges, but which may contain loops, are expressed as ordered pairs of the vertices and the edges (as proper or improper unordered pairs of vertices, not as indexed edges!) in this theorem. That class 𝐺 of such simple pseudographs is a set (if 𝑉 is a set, see uspgrex 46528) of equivalence classes of graphs abstracting from the index sets of their edge functions. Solely for this abstraction, there is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" as members of 𝐺 and the symmetric relations 𝑅 on the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices. This theorem would not hold for 𝐺 = {𝑔 ∈ USPGraph ∣ (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉} and even not for 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∈ USPGraph)}, because these are much bigger classes. (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 16-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrelALT 46533*	Alternate proof of uspgrbisymrel 46532 not using the definition of equinumerosity. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
21.45.16  Monoids (extension)
21.45.16.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	ovn0dmfun 46534	If a class operation value for two operands is not the empty set, then the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6935. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})))
Theorem	xpsnopab 46535*	A Cartesian product with a singleton expressed as ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ({𝑋} × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	xpiun 46536*	A Cartesian product expressed as indexed union of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	ovn0ssdmfun 46537*	If a class' operation value for two operands is not the empty set, the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6935. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑎𝐹𝑏) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐷 × 𝐸) ⊆ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ (𝐷 × 𝐸))))
Theorem	fnxpdmdm 46538	The domain of the domain of a function over a Cartesian square. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → dom dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnfldsrngbas 46539	The base set of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ ℂ → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngadd 46540	The group addition operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngmul 46541	The ring multiplication operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → · = (.r‘𝑅))
21.45.16.2  Magmas, Semigroups and Monoids (extension)
Theorem	plusfreseq 46542	If the empty set is not contained in the range of the group addition function of an extensible structure (not necessarily a magma), the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ∉ ran ⨣ → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	mgmplusfreseq 46543	If the empty set is not contained in the base set of a magma, the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ Mgm ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐵) → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	0mgm 46544	A set with an empty base set is always a magma. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (Base‘𝑀) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	mgmpropd 46545*	If two structures have the same (nonempty) base set, and the values of their group (addition) operations are equal for all pairs of elements of the base set, one is a magma iff the other one is. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Mgm ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Mgm))
Theorem	ismgmd 46546*	Deduce a magma from its properties. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm)
21.45.16.3  Magma homomorphisms and submagmas
Syntax	cmgmhm 46547	Hom-set generator class for magmas.
class MgmHom
Syntax	csubmgm 46548	Class function taking a magma to its lattice of submagmas.
class SubMgm
Definition	df-mgmhm 46549*	A magma homomorphism is a function on the base sets which preserves the binary operation. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ MgmHom = (𝑠 ∈ Mgm, 𝑡 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑡) ↑m (Base‘𝑠)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑠)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑠)(𝑓‘(𝑥(+g‘𝑠)𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥)(+g‘𝑡)(𝑓‘𝑦))})
Definition	df-submgm 46550*	A submagma is a subset of a magma which is closed under the operation. Such subsets are themselves magmas. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ SubMgm = (𝑠 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 (𝑥(+g‘𝑠)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡})
Theorem	mgmhmrcl 46551	Reverse closure of a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mgm))
Theorem	submgmrcl 46552	Reverse closure for submagmas. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	ismgmhm 46553*	Property of a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mgm) ∧ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
Theorem	mgmhmf 46554	A magma homomorphism is a function. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶)
Theorem	mgmhmpropd 46555*	Magma homomorphism depends only on the operation of structures. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐽)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝑀)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 MgmHom 𝐾) = (𝐿 MgmHom 𝑀))
Theorem	mgmhmlin 46556	A magma homomorphism preserves the binary operation. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	mgmhmf1o 46557	A magma homomorphism is bijective iff its converse is also a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 MgmHom 𝑆) → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶 ↔ ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑅)))
Theorem	idmgmhm 46558	The identity homomorphism on a magma. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∈ (𝑀 MgmHom 𝑀))
Theorem	issubmgm 46559*	Expand definition of a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)))
Theorem	issubmgm2 46560	Submagmas are subsets that are also magmas. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑀 ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ Mgm)))
Theorem	rabsubmgmd 46561*	Deduction for proving that a restricted class abstraction is a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜂)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (𝑥 + 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀))
Theorem	submgmss 46562	Submagmas are subsets of the base set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	submgmid 46563	Every magma is trivially a submagma of itself. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mgm → 𝐵 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀))
Theorem	submgmcl 46564	Submagmas are closed under the magma operation. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	submgmmgm 46565	Submagmas are themselves magmas under the given operation. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑀 ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) → 𝐻 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	submgmbas 46566	The base set of a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑀 ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐻))
Theorem	subsubmgm 46567	A submagma of a submagma is a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝐻) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)))
Theorem	resmgmhm 46568	Restriction of a magma homomorphism to a submagma is a homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑆)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) ∈ (𝑈 MgmHom 𝑇))
Theorem	resmgmhm2 46569	One direction of resmgmhm2b 46570. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑇 ↾s 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑈) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑇)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇))
Theorem	resmgmhm2b 46570	Restriction of the codomain of a homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑇 ↾s 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑇) ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ↔ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑈)))
Theorem	mgmhmco 46571	The composition of magma homomorphisms is a homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑇 MgmHom 𝑈) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑈))
Theorem	mgmhmima 46572	The homomorphic image of a submagma is a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 MgmHom 𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀)) → (𝐹 “ 𝑋) ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑁))
Theorem	mgmhmeql 46573	The equalizer of two magma homomorphisms is a submagma. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇)) → dom (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑆))
Theorem	submgmacs 46574	Submagmas are an algebraic closure system. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mgm → (SubMgm‘𝐺) ∈ (ACS‘𝐵))
Theorem	ismhm0 46575	Property of a monoid homomorphism, expressed by a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MndHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mnd) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ∧ (𝐹‘ 0 ) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	mhmismgmhm 46576	Each monoid homomorphism is a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 MndHom 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 MgmHom 𝑆))
21.45.16.4  Examples and counterexamples for magmas, semigroups and monoids (extension)
Theorem	opmpoismgm 46577*	A structure with a group addition operation in maps-to notation is a magma if the operation value is contained in the base set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	copissgrp 46578*	A structure with a constant group addition operation is a semigroup if the constant is contained in the base set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Smgrp)
Theorem	copisnmnd 46579*	A structure with a constant group addition operation and at least two elements is not a monoid. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (♯‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∉ Mnd)
Theorem	0nodd 46580*	0 is not an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 0 ∉ 𝑂
Theorem	1odd 46581*	1 is an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 1 ∈ 𝑂
Theorem	2nodd 46582*	2 is not an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 2 ∉ 𝑂
Theorem	oddibas 46583*	Lemma 1 for oddinmgm 46585: The base set of M is the set of all odd integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 = (Base‘𝑀)
Theorem	oddiadd 46584*	Lemma 2 for oddinmgm 46585: The group addition operation of M is the addition of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)
Theorem	oddinmgm 46585*	The structure of all odd integers together with the addition of complex numbers is not a magma. Remark: the structure of the complementary subset of the set of integers, the even integers, is a magma, actually an abelian group, see 2zrngaabl 46842, and even a non-unital ring, see 2zrng 46833. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∉ Mgm
Theorem	nnsgrpmgm 46586	The structure of positive integers together with the addition of complex numbers is a magma. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ Mgm
Theorem	nnsgrp 46587	The structure of positive integers together with the addition of complex numbers is a semigroup. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ Smgrp
Theorem	nnsgrpnmnd 46588	The structure of positive integers together with the addition of complex numbers is not a monoid. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∉ Mnd
Theorem	nn0mnd 46589	The set of nonnegative integers under (complex) addition is a monoid. Example in [Lang] p. 6. Remark: 𝑀 could have also been written as (ℂfld ↾s ℕ0). (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), ℕ0⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), + ⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ Mnd
21.45.16.5  Group sum operation (extension 1)
Theorem	gsumsplit2f 46590*	Split a group sum into two parts. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋) finSupp 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋)) = ((𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑋)) + (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑋))))
Theorem	gsumdifsndf 46591*	Extract a summand from a finitely supported group sum. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝑌    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋) finSupp (0g‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝑀) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋)) = ((𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑀}) ↦ 𝑋)) + 𝑌))
Theorem	gsumfsupp 46592	A group sum of a family can be restricted to the support of that family without changing its value, provided that that support is finite. This corresponds to the definition of an (infinite) product in [Lang] p. 5, last two formulas. (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐹 supp 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg (𝐹 ↾ 𝐼)) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹))
21.45.17  Magmas and internal binary operations (alternate approach) With df-mpo 7414, binary operations are defined by a rule, and with df-ov 7412, the value of a binary operation applied to two operands can be expressed. In both cases, the two operands can belong to different sets, and the result can be an element of a third set. However, according to Wikipedia "Binary operation", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation (19-Jan-2020), "... a binary operation on a set 𝑆 is a mapping of the elements of the Cartesian product 𝑆 × 𝑆 to S: 𝑓:𝑆 × 𝑆⟶𝑆. Because the result of performing the operation on a pair of elements of S is again an element of S, the operation is called a closed binary operation on S (or sometimes expressed as having the property of closure).". To distinguish this more restrictive definition (in Wikipedia and most of the literature) from the general case, we call binary operations mapping the elements of the Cartesian product 𝑆 × 𝑆 internal binary operations, see df-intop 46609. If, in addition, the result is also contained in the set 𝑆, the operation is called closed internal binary operation, see df-clintop 46610. Therefore, a "binary operation on a set 𝑆 " according to Wikipedia is a "closed internal binary operation" in our terminology. If the sets are different, the operation is explicitly called external binary operation (see Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation#External_binary_operations 46610 ). Taking a step back, we define "laws" applicable for "binary operations" (which even need not to be functions), according to the definition in [Hall] p. 1 and [BourbakiAlg1] p. 1, p. 4 and p. 7. These laws are used, on the one hand, to specialize internal binary operations (see df-clintop 46610 and df-assintop 46611), and on the other hand to define the common algebraic structures like magmas, groups, rings, etc. Internal binary operations, which obey these laws, are defined afterwards. Notice that in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 1, p. 4 and p. 7, these operations are called "laws" by themselves. In the following, an alternate definition df-cllaw 46596 for an internal binary operation is provided, which does not require function-ness, but only closure. Therefore, this definition could be used as binary operation (Slot 2) defined for a magma as extensible structure, see mgmplusgiopALT 46604, or for an alternate definition df-mgm2 46629 for a magma as extensible structure. Similar results are obtained for an associative operation (defining semigroups).
21.45.17.1  Laws for internal binary operations In this subsection, the "laws" applicable for "binary operations" according to the definition in [Hall] p. 1 and [BourbakiAlg1] p. 1, p. 4 and p. 7 are defined. These laws are called "internal laws" in [BourbakiAlg1] p. xxi.
Syntax	ccllaw 46593	Extend class notation for the closure law.
class clLaw
Syntax	casslaw 46594	Extend class notation for the associative law.
class assLaw
Syntax	ccomlaw 46595	Extend class notation for the commutative law.
class comLaw
Definition	df-cllaw 46596*	The closure law for binary operations, see definitions of laws A0. and M0. in section 1.1 of [Hall] p. 1, or definition 1 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 1: the value of a binary operation applied to two operands of a given sets is an element of this set. By this definition, the closure law is expressed as binary relation: a binary operation is related to a set by clLaw if the closure law holds for this binary operation regarding this set. Note that the binary operation needs not to be a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2020.)
⊢ clLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) ∈ 𝑚}
Definition	df-comlaw 46597*	The commutative law for binary operations, see definitions of laws A2. and M2. in section 1.1 of [Hall] p. 1, or definition 8 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 7: the value of a binary operation applied to two operands equals the value of a binary operation applied to the two operands in reversed order. By this definition, the commutative law is expressed as binary relation: a binary operation is related to a set by comLaw if the commutative law holds for this binary operation regarding this set. Note that the binary operation needs neither to be closed nor to be a function. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2020.)
⊢ comLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥)}
Definition	df-asslaw 46598*	The associative law for binary operations, see definitions of laws A1. and M1. in section 1.1 of [Hall] p. 1, or definition 5 in [BourbakiAlg1] p. 4: the value of a binary operation applied the value of the binary operation applied to two operands and a third operand equals the value of the binary operation applied to the first operand and the value of the binary operation applied to the second and third operand. By this definition, the associative law is expressed as binary relation: a binary operation is related to a set by assLaw if the associative law holds for this binary operation regarding this set. Note that the binary operation needs neither to be closed nor to be a function. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ assLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑚 ((𝑥𝑜𝑦)𝑜𝑧) = (𝑥𝑜(𝑦𝑜𝑧))}
Theorem	iscllaw 46599*	The predicate "is a closed operation". (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (( ⚬ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → ( ⚬ clLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀))
Theorem	iscomlaw 46600*	The predicate "is a commutative operation". (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (( ⚬ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → ( ⚬ comLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))