P. 123 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12201-12300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	infm3 12201*	The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. Dual of sup3 12199. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	suprcl 12202*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprub 12203*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprubd 12204*	Natural deduction form of suprubd 12204. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprcld 12205*	Natural deduction form of suprcl 12202. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprlub 12206*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnub 12207*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleub 12208*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	supaddc 12209*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 12211. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supadd 12210*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 12214. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmul1 12211*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 12214 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmullem1 12212*	Lemma for supmul 12214. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	supmullem2 12213*	Lemma for supmul 12214. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	supmul 12214*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 10996). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	sup3ii 12215*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprclii 12216*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	suprubii 12217*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprlubii 12218*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnubii 12219*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleubii 12220*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	riotaneg 12221*	The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓))
Theorem	negiso 12222	Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	dfinfre 12223*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	infrecl 12224*	Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	infrenegsup 12225*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelb 12226*	Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	infrelb 12227*	If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infrefilb 12228	The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	supfirege 12229	The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆)
5.3.9  Imaginary and complex number properties
Theorem	neg1cn 12230	-1 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ -1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	neg1rr 12231	-1 is a real number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 5-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	neg1ne0 12232	-1 is nonzero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 ≠ 0
Theorem	neg1lt0 12233	-1 is less than 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ -1 < 0
Theorem	negneg1e1 12234	--1 is 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ --1 = 1
Theorem	inelr 12235	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 12236	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	cru 12237	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	crne0 12238	The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0))
Theorem	creur 12239*	The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	creui 12240*	The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	cju 12241*	The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ))
5.3.10  Function operation analogue theorems
Theorem	ofsubeq0 12242	Function analogue of subeq0 11511. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	ofnegsub 12243	Function analogue of negsub 11533. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺))
Theorem	ofsubge0 12244	Function analogue of subge0 11754. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
5.3.11  Indicator Functions According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicator_function, "Indicator function", 11-Apr-2026): "In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function of a subset of a set is a function that maps elements of the subset to one, and all other elements to zero. That is, if 𝐴 is a subset of some set 𝑋, then the indicator function of 𝐴 is the function 𝟭A defined by 𝟭A ( x ) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, and 𝟭A ( x ) = 0 otherwise." See also definition in [Lang2] p. 3: "The characteristic function of a subset S' of S is the function 𝜒 such that 𝜒(x) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆' and 𝜒(x) = 0 if 𝑥 ∉ 𝑆'".
Syntax	cind 12245	Extend class notation with the indicator function generator.
class 𝟭
Definition	df-ind 12246*	Define the indicator function generator. It generates an indicator function ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain, see indval 12248. In contrast to the definitions and notations in Wikipedia and [Lang2] p. 3, the domain and the subset are always mentioned explicitly. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝟭 = (𝑜 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑜 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0))))
Theorem	indv 12247*	Value of the indicator function generator with domain 𝑂. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝟭‘𝑂) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎, 1, 0))))
Theorem	indval 12248*	Value of the indicator function generator for a set 𝐴 and a domain 𝑂, i.e., an indicator function for a given domain 𝑂 and a given subset 𝐴 of the domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0)))
Theorem	indval0 12249	The indicator function generator does not generate a (meaningful) indicator function for a class which is not a subset of the domain. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2026.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	indval2 12250	Alternate value of the indicator function generator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) = ((𝐴 × {1}) ∪ ((𝑂 ∖ 𝐴) × {0})))
Theorem	indf 12251	An indicator function as a function with domain and codomain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴):𝑂⟶{0, 1})
Theorem	indfval 12252	Value of the indicator function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))
Theorem	fvindre 12253	The range of the indicator function is a subset of ℝ. (Contributed by AV, 10-Apr-2026.)
⊢ (((𝑂 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	ind1 12254	Value of the indicator function where it is 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 1)
Theorem	ind0 12255	Value of the indicator function where it is 0. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑂 ∖ 𝐴)) → (((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 0)
Theorem	ind1a 12256	Value of the indicator function where it is 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑂) → ((((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)‘𝑋) = 1 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	indconst0 12257	Indicator of the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘∅) = (𝑂 × {0}))
Theorem	indconst1 12258	Indicator of the whole set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝑂) = (𝑂 × {1}))
Theorem	indpi1 12259	Preimage of the singleton {1} by the indicator function. See i1f1lem 25921. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Aug-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) → (◡((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴) “ {1}) = 𝐴)
5.4  Integer sets
5.4.1  Positive integers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cn 12260	Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers.
class ℕ
Definition	df-nn 12261	Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 12265), in contrast to the more elementary ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7866). See nnind 12278 for the principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12532 for the set of nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12544 for ℕ defined in terms of ℕ0. This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9623 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 12274 (or its slight variant dfnn2 12273). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω)
Theorem	nnexALT 12262	Alternate proof of nnex 12266, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5236. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	peano5nni 12263*	Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnssre 12264	The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	nnsscn 12265	The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 12264 and ax-resscn 11184 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	nnex 12266	The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	nnre 12267	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncn 12268	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	nnrei 12269	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	nncni 12270	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	1nn 12271	Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	peano2nn 12272	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	dfnn2 12273*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 12261 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	dfnn3 12274*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	nnred 12275	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncnd 12276	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2nnd 12277	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.2  Principle of mathematical induction
Theorem	nnind 12278*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12283 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12719 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12716, uzind4 12958 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12968 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12279. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindALT 12279*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the induction step and the basis. This ALT version of nnind 12278 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW";. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindd 12280*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	nn1m1nn 12281	Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nn1suc 12282*	If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃)
Theorem	nnaddcl 12283	Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcl 12284	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 11191 and ax-mulass 11193. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcli 12285	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ
Theorem	nnadd1com 12286	Addition with 1 is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) = (1 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcom 12287	Addition is commutative for natural numbers. Uses fewer axioms than addcom 11423. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcomli 12288	Version of addcomli 11429 for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	nnmtmip 12289	"Minus times minus is plus, The reason for this we need not discuss." (W. H. Auden, as quoted in M. Guillen "Bridges to Infinity", p. 64, see also Metamath Book, section 1.1.1, p. 5) This statement, formalized to "The product of two negative integers is a positive integer", is proved by the following theorem, therefore it actually need not be discussed anymore. "The reason for this" is that (-𝐴 · -𝐵) = (𝐴 · 𝐵) for all complex numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 because of mul2neg 11680, 𝐴 and 𝐵 are complex numbers because of nncn 12268, and (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ because of nnmulcl 12284. This also holds for positive reals, see rpmtmip 13070. Note that the opposites -𝐴 and -𝐵 of the positive integers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are negative integers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (-𝐴 · -𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nn2ge 12290*	There exists a positive integer greater than or equal to any two others. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	nnge1 12291	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	nngt1ne1 12292	A positive integer is greater than one iff it is not equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 1))
Theorem	nnle1eq1 12293	A positive integer is less than or equal to one iff it is equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ≤ 1 ↔ 𝐴 = 1))
Theorem	nngt0 12294	A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nnnlt1 12295	A positive integer is not less than one. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 < 1)
Theorem	nnnle0 12296	A positive integer is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 ≤ 0)
Theorem	nnne0 12297	A positive integer is nonzero. See nnne0ALT 12301 for a shorter proof using ax-pre-mulgt0 11204. This proof avoids 0lt1 11763, and thus ax-pre-mulgt0 11204, by splitting ax-1ne0 11196 into the two separate cases 0 < 1 and 1 < 0. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11204. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	nnneneg 12298	No positive integer is equal to its negation. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ -𝐴)
Theorem	0nnn 12299	Zero is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11204. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	0nnnALT 12300	Alternate proof of 0nnn 12299, which requires ax-pre-mulgt0 11204 but is not based on nnne0 12297 (and which can therefore be used in nnne0ALT 12301). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ