P. 123 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12201-12300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cru 12201	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	crne0 12202	The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0))
Theorem	creur 12203*	The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	creui 12204*	The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	cju 12205*	The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ))
5.3.10  Function operation analogue theorems
Theorem	ofsubeq0 12206	Function analogue of subeq0 11483. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	ofnegsub 12207	Function analogue of negsub 11505. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺))
Theorem	ofsubge0 12208	Function analogue of subge0 11724. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
5.4  Integer sets
5.4.1  Positive integers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cn 12209	Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers.
class ℕ
Definition	df-nn 12210	Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 12214), in contrast to the more elementary ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7849). See nnind 12227 for the principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12470 for the set of nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12482 for ℕ defined in terms of ℕ0. This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9632 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 12223 (or its slight variant dfnn2 12222). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω)
Theorem	nnexALT 12211	Alternate proof of nnex 12215, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5275. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	peano5nni 12212*	Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnssre 12213	The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	nnsscn 12214	The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 12213 and ax-resscn 11163 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	nnex 12215	The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	nnre 12216	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncn 12217	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	nnrei 12218	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	nncni 12219	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	1nn 12220	Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	peano2nn 12221	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	dfnn2 12222*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 12210 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	dfnn3 12223*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	nnred 12224	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncnd 12225	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2nnd 12226	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.2  Principle of mathematical induction
Theorem	nnind 12227*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12232 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12654 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12651, uzind4 12887 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12897 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12228. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindALT 12228*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the induction step and the basis. This ALT version of nnind 12227 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW";. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindd 12229*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	nn1m1nn 12230	Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nn1suc 12231*	If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃)
Theorem	nnaddcl 12232	Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcl 12233	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 11170 and ax-mulass 11172. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcli 12234	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ
Theorem	nnmtmip 12235	"Minus times minus is plus, The reason for this we need not discuss." (W. H. Auden, as quoted in M. Guillen "Bridges to Infinity", p. 64, see also Metamath Book, section 1.1.1, p. 5) This statement, formalized to "The product of two negative integers is a positive integer", is proved by the following theorem, therefore it actually need not be discussed anymore. "The reason for this" is that (-𝐴 · -𝐵) = (𝐴 · 𝐵) for all complex numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 because of mul2neg 11650, 𝐴 and 𝐵 are complex numbers because of nncn 12217, and (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ because of nnmulcl 12233. This also holds for positive reals, see rpmtmip 12995. Note that the opposites -𝐴 and -𝐵 of the positive integers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are negative integers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (-𝐴 · -𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nn2ge 12236*	There exists a positive integer greater than or equal to any two others. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	nnge1 12237	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	nngt1ne1 12238	A positive integer is greater than one iff it is not equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 1))
Theorem	nnle1eq1 12239	A positive integer is less than or equal to one iff it is equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ≤ 1 ↔ 𝐴 = 1))
Theorem	nngt0 12240	A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nnnlt1 12241	A positive integer is not less than one. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 < 1)
Theorem	nnnle0 12242	A positive integer is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 ≤ 0)
Theorem	nnne0 12243	A positive integer is nonzero. See nnne0ALT 12247 for a shorter proof using ax-pre-mulgt0 11183. This proof avoids 0lt1 11733, and thus ax-pre-mulgt0 11183, by splitting ax-1ne0 11175 into the two separate cases 0 < 1 and 1 < 0. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11183. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	nnneneg 12244	No positive integer is equal to its negation. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ -𝐴)
Theorem	0nnn 12245	Zero is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11183. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	0nnnALT 12246	Alternate proof of 0nnn 12245, which requires ax-pre-mulgt0 11183 but is not based on nnne0 12243 (and which can therefore be used in nnne0ALT 12247). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	nnne0ALT 12247	Alternate version of nnne0 12243. A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	nngt0i 12248	A positive integer is positive (inference version). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 0 < 𝐴
Theorem	nnne0i 12249	A positive integer is nonzero (inference version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 0
Theorem	nndivre 12250	The quotient of a real and a positive integer is real. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝑁) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nnrecre 12251	The reciprocal of a positive integer is real. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (1 / 𝑁) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nnrecgt0 12252	The reciprocal of a positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	nnsub 12253	Subtraction of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nnsubi 12254	Subtraction of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2001.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nndiv 12255*	Two ways to express "𝐴 divides 𝐵 " for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nndivtr 12256	Transitive property of divisibility: if 𝐴 divides 𝐵 and 𝐵 divides 𝐶, then 𝐴 divides 𝐶. Typically, 𝐶 would be an integer, although the theorem holds for complex 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2005.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((𝐵 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐶 / 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)) → (𝐶 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnge1d 12257	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	nngt0d 12258	A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nnne0d 12259	A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	nnrecred 12260	The reciprocal of a positive integer is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nnaddcld 12261	Closure of addition of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcld 12262	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nndivred 12263	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
5.4.3  Decimal representation of numbers The decimal representation of numbers/integers is based on the decimal digits 0 through 9 (df-0 11113 through df-9 12279), which are explicitly defined in the following. Note that the numbers 0 and 1 are constants defined as primitives of the complex number axiom system (see df-0 11113 and df-1 11114). With the decimal constructor df-dec 12675, it is possible to easily express larger integers in base 10. See deccl 12689 and the theorems that follow it. See also 4001prm 17077 (4001 is prime) and the proof of bpos 27142. Note that the decimal constructor builds on the definitions in this section. Note: The number 10 will be represented by its digits using the decimal constructor only, i.e., by ;10. Therefore, only decimal digits are needed (as symbols) for the decimal representation of a number. Integers can also be exhibited as sums of powers of 10 (e.g., the number 103 can be expressed as ((;10↑2) + 3)) or as some other expression built from operations on the numbers 0 through 9. For example, the prime number 823541 can be expressed as (7↑7) − 2. Decimals can be expressed as ratios of integers, as in cos2bnd 16128. Most abstract math rarely requires numbers larger than 4. Even in Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, the largest number used appears to be 12.
Syntax	c2 12264	Extend class notation to include the number 2.
class 2
Syntax	c3 12265	Extend class notation to include the number 3.
class 3
Syntax	c4 12266	Extend class notation to include the number 4.
class 4
Syntax	c5 12267	Extend class notation to include the number 5.
class 5
Syntax	c6 12268	Extend class notation to include the number 6.
class 6
Syntax	c7 12269	Extend class notation to include the number 7.
class 7
Syntax	c8 12270	Extend class notation to include the number 8.
class 8
Syntax	c9 12271	Extend class notation to include the number 9.
class 9
Definition	df-2 12272	Define the number 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 2 = (1 + 1)
Definition	df-3 12273	Define the number 3. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 3 = (2 + 1)
Definition	df-4 12274	Define the number 4. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 4 = (3 + 1)
Definition	df-5 12275	Define the number 5. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 5 = (4 + 1)
Definition	df-6 12276	Define the number 6. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 6 = (5 + 1)
Definition	df-7 12277	Define the number 7. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 7 = (6 + 1)
Definition	df-8 12278	Define the number 8. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 8 = (7 + 1)
Definition	df-9 12279	Define the number 9. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 9 = (8 + 1)
Theorem	0ne1 12280	Zero is different from one (the commuted form is Axiom ax-1ne0 11175). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 0 ≠ 1
Theorem	1m1e0 12281	One minus one equals zero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ (1 − 1) = 0
Theorem	2nn 12282	2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.)
⊢ 2 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	2re 12283	The number 2 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 2 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	2cn 12284	The number 2 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 2 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	2cnALT 12285	Alternate proof of 2cn 12284. Shorter but uses more axioms. Similar proofs are possible for 3cn 12290, ... , 9cn 12309. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 2 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	2ex 12286	The number 2 is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 2 ∈ V
Theorem	2cnd 12287	The number 2 is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	3nn 12288	3 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 3 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	3re 12289	The number 3 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	3cn 12290	The number 3 is a complex number. (Contributed by FL, 17-Oct-2010.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 3 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	3ex 12291	The number 3 is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 3 ∈ V
Theorem	4nn 12292	4 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 4 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	4re 12293	The number 4 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 4 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	4cn 12294	The number 4 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 4 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	5nn 12295	5 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	5re 12296	The number 5 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	5cn 12297	The number 5 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	6nn 12298	6 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 6 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	6re 12299	The number 6 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.)
⊢ 6 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	6cn 12300	The number 6 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 6 ∈ ℂ