P. 123 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12201-12300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lem1d 12201	A number minus 1 is less than or equal to itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 1) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	recgt0d 12202	The reciprocal of a positive number is positive. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 21. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	divgt0d 12203	The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt1d 12204	The product of two numbers greater than 1 is greater than 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge11d 12205	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge12d 12206	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	lemul1ad 12207	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	lemul2ad 12208	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵))
Theorem	ltmul12ad 12209	Comparison of product of two positive numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12ad 12210	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12bd 12211	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
5.3.8  Completeness Axiom and Suprema
Theorem	fimaxre 12212*	A finite set of real numbers has a maximum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre2 12213*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre3 12214*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a maximum (image set version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fiminre 12215*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a minimum. Analogous to fimaxre 12212. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	fiminre2 12216*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers is bounded below. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	negfi 12217*	The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	lbreu 12218*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	lbcl 12219*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound that belongs to the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lble 12220*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	lbinf 12221*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	lbinfcl 12222*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lbinfle 12223*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	sup2 12224*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Stronger version of completeness axiom (it has a slightly weaker antecedent). (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	sup3 12225*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	infm3lem 12226*	Lemma for infm3 12227. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝑥 = -𝑦)
Theorem	infm3 12227*	The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. (This theorem is the dual of sup3 12225.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	suprcl 12228*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprub 12229*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprubd 12230*	Natural deduction form of suprubd 12230. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprcld 12231*	Natural deduction form of suprcl 12228. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprlub 12232*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnub 12233*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleub 12234*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	supaddc 12235*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 12237. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supadd 12236*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 12240. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmul1 12237*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 12240 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmullem1 12238*	Lemma for supmul 12240. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	supmullem2 12239*	Lemma for supmul 12240. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	supmul 12240*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 11024). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	sup3ii 12241*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprclii 12242*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	suprubii 12243*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprlubii 12244*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnubii 12245*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleubii 12246*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	riotaneg 12247*	The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓))
Theorem	negiso 12248	Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	dfinfre 12249*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	infrecl 12250*	Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	infrenegsup 12251*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelb 12252*	Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	infrelb 12253*	If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infrefilb 12254	The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	supfirege 12255	The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆)
5.3.9  Imaginary and complex number properties
Theorem	inelr 12256	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 12257	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	cru 12258	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	crne0 12259	The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0))
Theorem	creur 12260*	The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	creui 12261*	The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	cju 12262*	The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ))
5.3.10  Function operation analogue theorems
Theorem	ofsubeq0 12263	Function analogue of subeq0 11535. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	ofnegsub 12264	Function analogue of negsub 11557. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺))
Theorem	ofsubge0 12265	Function analogue of subge0 11776. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
5.4  Integer sets
5.4.1  Positive integers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cn 12266	Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers.
class ℕ
Definition	df-nn 12267	Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 12271), in contrast to the more elementary ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7888). See nnind 12284 for the principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12527 for the set of nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12539 for ℕ defined in terms of ℕ0. This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9681 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 12280 (or its slight variant dfnn2 12279). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω)
Theorem	nnexALT 12268	Alternate proof of nnex 12272, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5279. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	peano5nni 12269*	Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnssre 12270	The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	nnsscn 12271	The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 12270 and ax-resscn 11212 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	nnex 12272	The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	nnre 12273	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncn 12274	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	nnrei 12275	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	nncni 12276	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	1nn 12277	Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	peano2nn 12278	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	dfnn2 12279*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 12267 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	dfnn3 12280*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	nnred 12281	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncnd 12282	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2nnd 12283	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.2  Principle of mathematical induction
Theorem	nnind 12284*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12289 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12713 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12710, uzind4 12948 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12958 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12285. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindALT 12285*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the induction step and the basis. This ALT version of nnind 12284 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW";. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindd 12286*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	nn1m1nn 12287	Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nn1suc 12288*	If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃)
Theorem	nnaddcl 12289	Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcl 12290	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 11219 and ax-mulass 11221. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcli 12291	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ
Theorem	nnmtmip 12292	"Minus times minus is plus, The reason for this we need not discuss." (W. H. Auden, as quoted in M. Guillen "Bridges to Infinity", p. 64, see also Metamath Book, section 1.1.1, p. 5) This statement, formalized to "The product of two negative integers is a positive integer", is proved by the following theorem, therefore it actually need not be discussed anymore. "The reason for this" is that (-𝐴 · -𝐵) = (𝐴 · 𝐵) for all complex numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 because of mul2neg 11702, 𝐴 and 𝐵 are complex numbers because of nncn 12274, and (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ because of nnmulcl 12290. This also holds for positive reals, see rpmtmip 13059. Note that the opposites -𝐴 and -𝐵 of the positive integers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are negative integers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (-𝐴 · -𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nn2ge 12293*	There exists a positive integer greater than or equal to any two others. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	nnge1 12294	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	nngt1ne1 12295	A positive integer is greater than one iff it is not equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 1))
Theorem	nnle1eq1 12296	A positive integer is less than or equal to one iff it is equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ≤ 1 ↔ 𝐴 = 1))
Theorem	nngt0 12297	A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nnnlt1 12298	A positive integer is not less than one. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 < 1)
Theorem	nnnle0 12299	A positive integer is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 ≤ 0)
Theorem	nnne0 12300	A positive integer is nonzero. See nnne0ALT 12304 for a shorter proof using ax-pre-mulgt0 11232. This proof avoids 0lt1 11785, and thus ax-pre-mulgt0 11232, by splitting ax-1ne0 11224 into the two separate cases 0 < 1 and 1 < 0. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11232. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0)