P. 123 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12201-12300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mulgt1d 12201	The product of two numbers greater than 1 is greater than 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge11d 12202	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	lemulge12d 12203	Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	lemul1ad 12204	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	lemul2ad 12205	Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵))
Theorem	ltmul12ad 12206	Comparison of product of two positive numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12ad 12207	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	lemul12bd 12208	Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷))
5.3.8  Completeness Axiom and Suprema
Theorem	fimaxre 12209*	A finite set of real numbers has a maximum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre2 12210*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fimaxre3 12211*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a maximum (image set version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	fiminre 12212*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a minimum. Analogous to fimaxre 12209. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	fiminre2 12213*	A nonempty finite set of real numbers is bounded below. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	negfi 12214*	The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	lbreu 12215*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	lbcl 12216*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound that belongs to the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lble 12217*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	lbinf 12218*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	lbinfcl 12219*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	lbinfle 12220*	If a set of reals contains a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	sup2 12221*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Stronger version of completeness axiom (it has a slightly weaker antecedent). (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	sup3 12222*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	infm3lem 12223*	Lemma for infm3 12224. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝑥 = -𝑦)
Theorem	infm3 12224*	The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. (This theorem is the dual of sup3 12222.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
Theorem	suprcl 12225*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprub 12226*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprubd 12227*	Natural deduction form of suprubd 12227. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprcld 12228*	Natural deduction form of suprcl 12225. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	suprlub 12229*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnub 12230*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleub 12231*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	supaddc 12232*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 12234. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supadd 12233*	The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 12237. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmul1 12234*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 12237 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	supmullem1 12235*	Lemma for supmul 12237. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )))
Theorem	supmullem2 12236*	Lemma for supmul 12237. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	supmul 12237*	The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 11021). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	sup3ii 12238*	A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprclii 12239*	Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	suprubii 12240*	A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	suprlubii 12241*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprnubii 12242*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧))
Theorem	suprleubii 12243*	The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	riotaneg 12244*	The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓))
Theorem	negiso 12245	Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	dfinfre 12246*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	infrecl 12247*	Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	infrenegsup 12248*	The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	infregelb 12249*	Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	infrelb 12250*	If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infrefilb 12251	The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	supfirege 12252	The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆)
5.3.9  Imaginary and complex number properties
Theorem	inelr 12253	The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	rimul 12254	A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	cru 12255	The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	crne0 12256	The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0))
Theorem	creur 12257*	The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	creui 12258*	The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	cju 12259*	The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ))
5.3.10  Function operation analogue theorems
Theorem	ofsubeq0 12260	Function analogue of subeq0 11532. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	ofnegsub 12261	Function analogue of negsub 11554. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺))
Theorem	ofsubge0 12262	Function analogue of subge0 11773. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
5.4  Integer sets
5.4.1  Positive integers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cn 12263	Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers.
class ℕ
Definition	df-nn 12264	Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 12268), in contrast to the more elementary ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7887). See nnind 12281 for the principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12524 for the set of nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12536 for ℕ defined in terms of ℕ0. This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9678 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 12277 (or its slight variant dfnn2 12276). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω)
Theorem	nnexALT 12265	Alternate proof of nnex 12269, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5284. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	peano5nni 12266*	Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nnssre 12267	The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	nnsscn 12268	The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 12267 and ax-resscn 11209 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	nnex 12269	The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V
Theorem	nnre 12270	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncn 12271	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	nnrei 12272	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	nncni 12273	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	1nn 12274	Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	peano2nn 12275	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	dfnn2 12276*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 12264 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	dfnn3 12277*	Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	nnred 12278	A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	nncnd 12279	A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2nnd 12280	Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.2  Principle of mathematical induction
Theorem	nnind 12281*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12286 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12710 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12707, uzind4 12945 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12955 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12282. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindALT 12282*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the induction step and the basis. This ALT version of nnind 12281 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW";. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏)
Theorem	nnindd 12283*	Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	nn1m1nn 12284	Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nn1suc 12285*	If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃)
Theorem	nnaddcl 12286	Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcl 12287	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 11216 and ax-mulass 11218. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nnmulcli 12288	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ
Theorem	nnmtmip 12289	"Minus times minus is plus, The reason for this we need not discuss." (W. H. Auden, as quoted in M. Guillen "Bridges to Infinity", p. 64, see also Metamath Book, section 1.1.1, p. 5) This statement, formalized to "The product of two negative integers is a positive integer", is proved by the following theorem, therefore it actually need not be discussed anymore. "The reason for this" is that (-𝐴 · -𝐵) = (𝐴 · 𝐵) for all complex numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 because of mul2neg 11699, 𝐴 and 𝐵 are complex numbers because of nncn 12271, and (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ because of nnmulcl 12287. This also holds for positive reals, see rpmtmip 13056. Note that the opposites -𝐴 and -𝐵 of the positive integers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are negative integers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (-𝐴 · -𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	nn2ge 12290*	There exists a positive integer greater than or equal to any two others. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	nnge1 12291	A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	nngt1ne1 12292	A positive integer is greater than one iff it is not equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 1))
Theorem	nnle1eq1 12293	A positive integer is less than or equal to one iff it is equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ≤ 1 ↔ 𝐴 = 1))
Theorem	nngt0 12294	A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nnnlt1 12295	A positive integer is not less than one. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 < 1)
Theorem	nnnle0 12296	A positive integer is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 ≤ 0)
Theorem	nnne0 12297	A positive integer is nonzero. See nnne0ALT 12301 for a shorter proof using ax-pre-mulgt0 11229. This proof avoids 0lt1 11782, and thus ax-pre-mulgt0 11229, by splitting ax-1ne0 11221 into the two separate cases 0 < 1 and 1 < 0. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11229. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	nnneneg 12298	No positive integer is equal to its negation. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ -𝐴)
Theorem	0nnn 12299	Zero is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 11229. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	0nnnALT 12300	Alternate proof of 0nnn 12299, which requires ax-pre-mulgt0 11229 but is not based on nnne0 12297 (and which can therefore be used in nnne0ALT 12301). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ