P. 272 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27101-27200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cxploglim2 27101*	Every power of the logarithm grows slower than any positive power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((log‘𝑛)↑𝑐𝐴) / (𝑛↑𝑐𝐵))) ⇝𝑟 0)
Theorem	divsqrtsumlem 27102*	Lemma for divsqrsum 27104 and divsqrtsum2 27105. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(1 / (√‘𝑛)) − (2 · (√‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:ℝ+⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ∧ ((𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐿 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝐴) − 𝐿)) ≤ (1 / (√‘𝐴))))
Theorem	divsqrsumf 27103*	The function 𝐹 used in divsqrsum 27104 is a real function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(1 / (√‘𝑛)) − (2 · (√‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℝ+⟶ℝ
Theorem	divsqrsum 27104*	The sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(1 / √𝑛) is asymptotic to 2√𝑥 + 𝐿 with a finite limit 𝐿. (In fact, this limit is ζ(1 / 2) ≈ -1.46....) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(1 / (√‘𝑛)) − (2 · (√‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟
Theorem	divsqrtsum2 27105*	A bound on the distance of the sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(1 / √𝑛) from its asymptotic value 2√𝑥 + 𝐿. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(1 / (√‘𝑛)) − (2 · (√‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝐴) − 𝐿)) ≤ (1 / (√‘𝐴)))
Theorem	divsqrtsumo1 27106*	The sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(1 / √𝑛) has the asymptotic expansion 2√𝑥 + 𝐿 + 𝑂(1 / √𝑥), for some 𝐿. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(1 / (√‘𝑛)) − (2 · (√‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑦) − 𝐿) · (√‘𝑦))) ∈ 𝑂(1))
14.3.12  Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means
Theorem	cvxcl 27107*	Closure of a 0-1 linear combination in a convex set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥[,]𝑦) ⊆ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1))) → ((𝑇 · 𝑋) + ((1 − 𝑇) · 𝑌)) ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	scvxcvx 27108*	A strictly convex function is convex. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑎[,]𝑏) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (0(,)1)) → (𝐹‘((𝑡 · 𝑥) + ((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑦))) < ((𝑡 · (𝐹‘𝑥)) + ((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐹‘𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1))) → (𝐹‘((𝑇 · 𝑋) + ((1 − 𝑇) · 𝑌))) ≤ ((𝑇 · (𝐹‘𝑋)) + ((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐹‘𝑌))))
Theorem	jensenlem1 27109*	Lemma for jensen 27111. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑎[,]𝑏) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:𝐴⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐴⟶𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (ℂfld Σg 𝑇))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1))) → (𝐹‘((𝑡 · 𝑥) + ((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑦))) ≤ ((𝑡 · (𝐹‘𝑥)) + ((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐹‘𝑦))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧}) ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ↾ (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (𝑆 + (𝑇‘𝑧)))
Theorem	jensenlem2 27110*	Lemma for jensen 27111. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑎[,]𝑏) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:𝐴⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐴⟶𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (ℂfld Σg 𝑇))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1))) → (𝐹‘((𝑡 · 𝑥) + ((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑦))) ≤ ((𝑡 · (𝐹‘𝑥)) + ((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐹‘𝑦))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧}) ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ↾ (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋) ↾ 𝐵)) / 𝑆) ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋) ↾ 𝐵)) / 𝑆)) ≤ ((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘ 𝑋)) ↾ 𝐵)) / 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋) ↾ (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧}))) / 𝐿) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐹‘((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋) ↾ (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧}))) / 𝐿)) ≤ ((ℂfld Σg ((𝑇 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘ 𝑋)) ↾ (𝐵 ∪ {𝑧}))) / 𝐿)))
Theorem	jensen 27111*	Jensen's inequality, a finite extension of the definition of convexity (the last hypothesis). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑎[,]𝑏) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:𝐴⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐴⟶𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (ℂfld Σg 𝑇))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1))) → (𝐹‘((𝑡 · 𝑥) + ((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑦))) ≤ ((𝑡 · (𝐹‘𝑥)) + ((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐹‘𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋)) / (ℂfld Σg 𝑇)) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐹‘((ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ∘f · 𝑋)) / (ℂfld Σg 𝑇))) ≤ ((ℂfld Σg (𝑇 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘ 𝑋))) / (ℂfld Σg 𝑇))))
Theorem	amgmlem 27112	Lemma for amgm 27113. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 Σg 𝐹)↑𝑐(1 / (♯‘𝐴))) ≤ ((ℂfld Σg 𝐹) / (♯‘𝐴)))
Theorem	amgm 27113	Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means. Here (𝑀 Σg 𝐹) calculates the group sum within the multiplicative monoid of the complex numbers (or in other words, it multiplies the elements 𝐹(𝑥), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 together), and (ℂfld Σg 𝐹) calculates the group sum in the additive group (i.e. the sum of the elements). This is Metamath 100 proof #38. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(0[,)+∞)) → ((𝑀 Σg 𝐹)↑𝑐(1 / (♯‘𝐴))) ≤ ((ℂfld Σg 𝐹) / (♯‘𝐴)))
14.3.13  Euler-Mascheroni constant
Syntax	cem 27114	The Euler-Mascheroni constant. (The label abbreviates Euler-Mascheroni.)
class γ
Definition	df-em 27115	Define the Euler-Mascheroni constant, γ = 0.57721.... This is the limit of the series Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑚)(1 / 𝑘) − (log‘𝑚), with a proof that the limit exists in emcl 27125. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((1 / 𝑘) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑘))))
Theorem	logdifbnd 27116	Bound on the difference of logs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → ((log‘(𝐴 + 1)) − (log‘𝐴)) ≤ (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	logdiflbnd 27117	Lower bound on the difference of logs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (1 / (𝐴 + 1)) ≤ ((log‘(𝐴 + 1)) − (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	emcllem1 27118*	Lemma for emcl 27125. The series 𝐹 and 𝐺 are sequences of real numbers that approach γ from above and below, respectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	emcllem2 27119*	Lemma for emcl 27125. 𝐹 is increasing, and 𝐺 is decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑁) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑁) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	emcllem3 27120*	Lemma for emcl 27125. The function 𝐻 is the difference between 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐻‘𝑁) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) − (𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	emcllem4 27121*	Lemma for emcl 27125. The difference between series 𝐹 and 𝐺 tends to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐻 ⇝ 0
Theorem	emcllem5 27122*	Lemma for emcl 27125. The partial sums of the series 𝑇, which is used in Definition df-em 27115, is in fact the same as 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq1( + , 𝑇)
Theorem	emcllem6 27123*	Lemma for emcl 27125. By the previous lemmas, 𝐹 and 𝐺 must approach a common limit, which is γ by definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ γ ∧ 𝐺 ⇝ γ)
Theorem	emcllem7 27124*	Lemma for emcl 27125 and harmonicbnd 27126. Derive bounds on γ as 𝐹(1) and 𝐺(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (γ ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]1) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ⟶(γ[,]1) ∧ 𝐺:ℕ⟶((1 − (log‘2))[,]γ))
Theorem	emcl 27125	Closure and bounds for the Euler-Mascheroni constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]1)
Theorem	harmonicbnd 27126*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑁)) ∈ (γ[,]1))
Theorem	harmonicbnd2 27127*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]γ))
Theorem	emre 27128	The Euler-Mascheroni constant is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ ∈ ℝ
Theorem	emgt0 27129	The Euler-Mascheroni constant is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 0 < γ
Theorem	harmonicbnd3 27130*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∈ (0[,]γ))
Theorem	harmoniclbnd 27131*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log‘𝐴) ≤ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚))
Theorem	harmonicubnd 27132*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ≤ 𝐴) → Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚) ≤ ((log‘𝐴) + 1))
Theorem	harmonicbnd4 27133*	The asymptotic behavior of Σ𝑚 ≤ 𝐴, 1 / 𝑚 = log𝐴 + γ + 𝑂(1 / 𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (abs‘(Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚) − ((log‘𝐴) + γ))) ≤ (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	fsumharmonic 27134*	Bound a finite sum based on the harmonic series, where the "strong" bound 𝐶 only applies asymptotically, and there is a "weak" bound 𝑅 for the remaining values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝑛))    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝐴 / 𝑛) < 𝑇) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(𝐵 / 𝑛)) ≤ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))𝐶 + (𝑅 · ((log‘𝑇) + 1))))
14.3.14  Zeta function
Syntax	czeta 27135	The Riemann zeta function.
class ζ
Definition	df-zeta 27136*	Define the Riemann zeta function. This definition uses a series expansion of the alternating zeta function ~? zetaalt that is convergent everywhere except 1, but going from the alternating zeta function to the regular zeta function requires dividing by 1 − 2↑(1 − 𝑠), which has zeroes other than 1. To extract the correct value of the zeta function at these points, we extend the divided alternating zeta function by continuity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ζ = (℩𝑓 ∈ ((ℂ ∖ {1})–cn→ℂ)∀𝑠 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {1})((1 − (2↑𝑐(1 − 𝑠))) · (𝑓‘𝑠)) = Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑛)(((-1↑𝑘) · (𝑛C𝑘)) · ((𝑘 + 1)↑𝑐𝑠)) / (2↑(𝑛 + 1))))
Theorem	zetacvg 27137*	The zeta series is convergent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (ℜ‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝑘↑𝑐-𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
14.3.15  Gamma function
Syntax	clgam 27138	Logarithm of the Gamma function.
class log Γ
Syntax	cgam 27139	The Gamma function.
class Γ
Syntax	cigam 27140	The inverse Gamma function.
class 1/Γ
Definition	df-lgam 27141*	Define the log-Gamma function. We can work with this form of the gamma function a bit easier than the equivalent expression for the gamma function itself, and moreover this function is not actually equal to log(Γ(𝑥)) because the branch cuts are placed differently (we do have exp(log Γ(𝑥)) = Γ(𝑥), though). This definition is attributed to Euler, and unlike the usual integral definition is defined on the entire complex plane except the nonpositive integers ℤ ∖ ℕ, where the function has simple poles. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ log Γ = (𝑧 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))) − (log‘𝑧)))
Definition	df-gam 27142	Define the Gamma function. See df-lgam 27141 for more information about the reason for this definition in terms of the log-gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Γ = (exp ∘ log Γ)
Definition	df-igam 27143	Define the inverse Gamma function, which is defined everywhere, unlike the Gamma function itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝑥))))
Theorem	eldmgm 27144	Elementhood in the set of non-nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -𝐴 ∈ ℕ0))
Theorem	dmgmaddn0 27145	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is nonzero for any nonnegative integer 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmlogdmgm 27146	If 𝐴 is in the continuous domain of the logarithm, then it is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0)) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	rpdmgm 27147	A positive real number is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmn0 27148	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmgmaddnn0 27149	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer and 𝑁 is a nonnegative integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is also not a nonpositive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmdivn0 27150	Lemma for lgamf 27164. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝑀) + 1) ≠ 0)
Theorem	lgamgulmlem1 27151*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem2 27152*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((1 / (𝑁 − 𝑅)) − (1 / 𝑁))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem3 27153*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑁 + 1) / 𝑁))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑁↑2))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem4 27154*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝑇) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	lgamgulmlem5 27155*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27157. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) → (abs‘((𝐺‘𝑛)‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑇‘𝑛))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem6 27156*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈) ∧ (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ 𝑂) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘𝑂) ≤ 𝑟)))
Theorem	lgamgulm 27157*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamgulm2 27158*	Rewrite the limit of the sequence 𝐺 in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (log Γ‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((log Γ‘𝑧) + (log‘𝑧)))))
Theorem	lgambdd 27159*	The log-Gamma function is bounded on the region 𝑈. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘(log Γ‘𝑧)) ≤ 𝑟)
Theorem	lgamucov 27160*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27157 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ ((int‘𝐽)‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamucov2 27161*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27157 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	lgamcvglem 27162*	Lemma for lgamf 27164 and lgamcvg 27176. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴))))
Theorem	lgamcl 27163	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	lgamf 27164	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ log Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamf 27165	The Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamcl 27166	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eflgam 27167	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (exp‘(log Γ‘𝐴)) = (Γ‘𝐴))
Theorem	gamne0 27168	The Gamma function is never zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ≠ 0)
Theorem	igamval 27169	Value of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = if(𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	igamz 27170	Value of the inverse Gamma function on nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	igamgam 27171	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamlgam 27172	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (exp‘-(log Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamf 27173	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ:ℂ⟶ℂ
Theorem	igamcl 27174	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	gamigam 27175	The Gamma function is the inverse of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (1/Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg 27176*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴) + log(𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg2 27177*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	gamcvg 27178*	The pointwise exponential of the series 𝐺 converges to Γ(𝐴) · 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	lgamp1 27179	The functional equation of the (log) Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	gamp1 27180	The functional equation of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	gamcvg2lem 27181*	Lemma for gamcvg2 27182. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) = seq1( · , 𝐹))
Theorem	gamcvg2 27182*	An infinite product expression for the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	regamcl 27183	The Gamma function is real for real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relgamcl 27184	The log-Gamma function is real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpgamcl 27185	The log-Gamma function is positive real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	lgam1 27186	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (log Γ‘1) = 0
Theorem	gam1 27187	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (Γ‘1) = 1
Theorem	facgam 27188	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝑁) = (Γ‘(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	gamfac 27189	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Γ‘𝑁) = (!‘(𝑁 − 1)))
14.4  Basic number theory
14.4.1  Wilson's theorem
Theorem	wilthlem1 27190	The only elements that are equal to their own inverses in the multiplicative group of nonzero elements in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ are 1 and -1≡𝑃 − 1. (Note that from prmdiveq 16835, (𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃 is the modular inverse of 𝑁 in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))) → (𝑁 = ((𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = (𝑃 − 1))))
Theorem	wilthlem2 27191*	Lemma for wilth 27193: induction step. The "hand proof" version of this theorem works by writing out the list of all numbers from 1 to 𝑃 − 1 in pairs such that a number is paired with its inverse. Every number has a unique inverse different from itself except 1 and 𝑃 − 1, and so each pair multiplies to 1, and 1 and 𝑃 − 1≡-1 multiply to -1, so the full product is equal to -1. Here we make this precise by doing the product pair by pair. The induction hypothesis says that every subset 𝑆 of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse (i.e. all pairs are matched up) and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃. Given such a set, we take out one element 𝑧 ≠ 𝑃 − 1. If there are no such elements, then 𝑆 = {𝑃 − 1} which forms the base case. Otherwise, 𝑆 ∖ {𝑧, 𝑧↑-1} is also closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1, so the induction hypothesis says that this equals -1; and the remaining two elements are either equal to each other, in which case wilthlem1 27190 gives that 𝑧 = 1 or 𝑃 − 1, and we've already excluded the second case, so the product gives 1; or 𝑧 ≠ 𝑧↑-1 and their product is 1. In either case the accumulated product is unaffected. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑠)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑆)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
Theorem	wilthlem3 27192*	Lemma for wilth 27193. Here we round out the argument of wilthlem2 27191 with the final step of the induction. The induction argument shows that every subset of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃, and clearly 1...(𝑃 − 1) itself is such a set. Thus, the product of all the elements is -1, and all that is left is to translate the group sum notation (which we used for its unordered summing capabilities) into an ordered sequence to match the definition of the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∥ ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) + 1))
Theorem	wilth 27193	Wilson's theorem. A number is prime iff it is greater than or equal to 2 and (𝑁 − 1)! is congruent to -1, mod 𝑁, or alternatively if 𝑁 divides (𝑁 − 1)! + 1. In this part of the proof we show the relatively simple reverse implication; see wilthlem3 27192 for the forward implication. This is Metamath 100 proof #51. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ ((!‘(𝑁 − 1)) + 1)))
Theorem	wilthimp 27194	The forward implication of Wilson's theorem wilth 27193 (see wilthlem3 27192), expressed using the modulo operation: For any prime 𝑝 we have (𝑝 − 1)!≡ − 1 (mod 𝑝), see theorem 5.24 in [ApostolNT] p. 116. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
14.4.2  The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Theorem	ftalem1 27195*	Lemma for fta 27202: "growth lemma". There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 is arbitrarily close in proportion to its dominant term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(abs‘(𝐴‘𝑘)) / 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑥) − ((𝐴‘𝑁) · (𝑥↑𝑁)))) < (𝐸 · ((abs‘𝑥)↑𝑁))))
Theorem	ftalem2 27196*	Lemma for fta 27202. There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 has magnitude greater than 𝐹(0) outside the closed ball B(0,r). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = if(if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1) ≤ 𝑇, 𝑇, if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / ((abs‘(𝐴‘𝑁)) / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))
Theorem	ftalem3 27197*	Lemma for fta 27202. There exists a global minimum of the function abs ∘ 𝐹. The proof uses a circle of radius 𝑟 where 𝑟 is the value coming from ftalem1 27195; since this is a compact set, the minimum on this disk is achieved, and this must then be the global minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑅}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑅 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	ftalem4 27198*	Lemma for fta 27202: Closure of the auxiliary variables for ftalem5 27199. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴‘𝐾) ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)))
Theorem	ftalem5 27199*	Lemma for fta 27202: Main proof. We have already shifted the minimum found in ftalem3 27197 to zero by a change of variables, and now we show that the minimum value is zero. Expanding in a series about the minimum value, let 𝐾 be the lowest term in the polynomial that is nonzero, and let 𝑇 be a 𝐾-th root of -𝐹(0) / 𝐴(𝐾). Then an evaluation of 𝐹(𝑇𝑋) where 𝑋 is a sufficiently small positive number yields 𝐹(0) for the first term and -𝐹(0) · 𝑋↑𝐾 for the 𝐾-th term, and all higher terms are bounded because 𝑋 is small. Thus, abs(𝐹(𝑇𝑋)) ≤ abs(𝐹(0))(1 − 𝑋↑𝐾) < abs(𝐹(0)), in contradiction to our choice of 𝐹(0) as the minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))
Theorem	ftalem6 27200*	Lemma for fta 27202: Discharge the auxiliary variables in ftalem5 27199. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))