P. 251 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 25001-25100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cxpaddd 25001	Sum of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Proposition 10-4.2(a) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) · (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpsubd 25002	Exponent subtraction law for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 − 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpltd 25003	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpled 25004	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxplead 25005	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	divcxpd 25006	Complex exponentiation of a quotient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) / (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	recxpcld 25007	Positive real closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	cxpge0d 25008	Nonnegative exponentiation with a real exponent is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	cxple2ad 25009	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	cxplt2d 25010	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) < (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxple2d 25011	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	mulcxpd 25012	Complex exponentiation of a product. Proposition 10-4.2(c) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) · (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpsqrtth 25013	Square root theorem over the complex numbers for the complex power function. Theorem I.35 of [Apostol] p. 29. Compare with sqrtth 14585. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((√‘𝐴)↑𝑐2) = 𝐴)
Theorem	2irrexpq 25014*	There exist irrational numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 such that (𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "classical proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. This proof is not acceptable in intuitionistic logic, since it is based on the law of excluded middle: Either ((√‘2)↑𝑐(√‘2)) is rational, in which case (√‘2), being irrational (see sqrt2irr 15462), can be chosen for both 𝑎 and 𝑏, or ((√‘2)↑𝑐(√‘2)) is irrational, in which case ((√‘2)↑𝑐(√‘2)) can be chosen for 𝑎 and (√‘2) for 𝑏, since (((√‘2)↑𝑐(√‘2))↑𝑐(√‘2)) = 2 is rational. For an alternate proof, which can be used in intuitionistic logic, see 2irrexpqALT 25079. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)∃𝑏 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ
Theorem	cxprecd 25015	Complex exponentiation of a reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑐𝐵) = (1 / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	rpcxpcld 25016	Positive real closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	logcxpd 25017	Logarithm of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (log‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) = (𝐵 · (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cxplt3d 25018	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxple3d 25019	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxpmuld 25020	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Proposition 10-4.2(b) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	cxpcom 25021	Commutative law for real exponentiation. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	dvcxp1 25022*	The derivative of a complex power with respect to the first argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝑥↑𝑐(𝐴 − 1)))))
Theorem	dvcxp2 25023*	The derivative of a complex power with respect to the second argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐴↑𝑐𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((log‘𝐴) · (𝐴↑𝑐𝑥))))
Theorem	dvsqrt 25024	The derivative of the real square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.)
⊢ (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (√‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (1 / (2 · (√‘𝑥))))
Theorem	dvcncxp1 25025*	Derivative of complex power with respect to first argument on the complex plane. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴 · (𝑥↑𝑐(𝐴 − 1)))))
Theorem	dvcnsqrt 25026*	Derivative of square root function. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (√‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (1 / (2 · (√‘𝑥))))
Theorem	cxpcn 25027*	Domain of continuity of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	cxpcn2 25028*	Continuity of the complex power function, when the base is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	cxpcn3lem 25029*	Lemma for cxpcn3 25030. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (◡ℜ “ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (if((ℜ‘𝐴) ≤ 1, (ℜ‘𝐴), 1) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(𝑈 ≤ (𝐸↑𝑐(1 / 𝑈)), 𝑈, (𝐸↑𝑐(1 / 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑎 ∈ (0[,)+∞)∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 (((abs‘𝑎) < 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑏)) < 𝑑) → (abs‘(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏)) < 𝐸))
Theorem	cxpcn3 25030*	Extend continuity of the complex power function to a base of zero, as long as the exponent has strictly positive real part. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (◡ℜ “ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (0[,)+∞), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐿) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	resqrtcn 25031	Continuity of the real square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (√ ↾ (0[,)+∞)) ∈ ((0[,)+∞)–cn→ℝ)
Theorem	sqrtcn 25032	Continuity of the square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (√ ↾ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ)
Theorem	cxpaddlelem 25033	Lemma for cxpaddle 25034. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	cxpaddle 25034	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) + (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	abscxpbnd 25035	Bound on the absolute value of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (ℜ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑀↑𝑐(ℜ‘𝐵)) · (exp‘((abs‘𝐵) · π))))
Theorem	root1id 25036	Property of an 𝑁-th root of unity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝑁) = 1)
Theorem	root1eq1 25037	The only powers of an 𝑁-th root of unity that equal 1 are the multiples of 𝑁. In other words, -1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁) has order 𝑁 in the multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers. (In fact, these and their powers are the only elements of finite order in the complex numbers.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝐾) = 1 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾))
Theorem	root1cj 25038	Within the 𝑁-th roots of unity, the conjugate of the 𝐾-th root is the 𝑁 − 𝐾-th root. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (∗‘((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝐾)) = ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑(𝑁 − 𝐾)))
Theorem	cxpeq 25039*	Solve an equation involving an 𝑁-th power. The expression -1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁) = exp(2πi / 𝑁) is a way to write the primitive 𝑁-th root of unity with the smallest positive argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 = ((𝐵↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) · ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝑛))))
Theorem	loglesqrt 25040	An upper bound on the logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (log‘(𝐴 + 1)) ≤ (√‘𝐴))
Theorem	logreclem 25041	Symmetry of the natural logarithm range by negation. Lemma for logrec 25042. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 27-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ran log ∧ ¬ (ℑ‘𝐴) = π) → -𝐴 ∈ ran log)
Theorem	logrec 25042	Logarithm of a reciprocal changes sign. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 28-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ (ℑ‘(log‘𝐴)) ≠ π) → (log‘𝐴) = -(log‘(1 / 𝐴)))
14.3.5  Logarithms to an arbitrary base Define "log using an arbitrary base" function and then prove some of its properties. Note that logb is generalized to an arbitrary base and arbitrary parameter in ℂ, but it doesn't accept infinities as arguments, unlike log. Metamath doesn't care what letters are used to represent classes. Usually classes begin with the letter "A", but here we use "B" and "X" to more clearly distinguish between "base" and "other parameter of log". There are different ways this could be defined in Metamath. The approach used here is intentionally similar to existing 2-parameter Metamath functions (operations): (𝐵 logb 𝑋) where 𝐵 is the base and 𝑋 is the argument of the logarithm function. An alternative would be to support the notational form (( logb ‘𝐵)‘𝑋); that looks a little more like traditional notation. Such a function ( logb ‘𝐵) for a fixed base can be obtained in Metamath (without the need for a new definition) by the curry function: (curry logb ‘𝐵), see logbmpt 25067, logbf 25068 and logbfval 25069.
Syntax	clogb 25043	Extend class notation to include the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base.
class logb
Definition	df-logb 25044*	Define the logb operator. This is the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base. It can be used as (𝐵 logb 𝑋) for "log base B of X". In the most common traditional notation, base B is a subscript of "log". The definition is according to Wikipedia "Complex logarithm": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm#Logarithms_to_other_bases (10-Jun-2020). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ logb = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((log‘𝑦) / (log‘𝑥)))
Theorem	logbval 25045	Define the value of the logb function, the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base, when used as infix. Most Metamath statements select variables in order of their use, but to make the order clearer we use "B" for base and "X" for the argument of the logarithm function here. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	logbcl 25046	General logarithm closure. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	logbid1 25047	General logarithm is 1 when base and arg match. Property 1(a) of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (𝐴 logb 𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	logb1 25048	The logarithm of 1 to an arbitrary base 𝐵 is 0. Property 1(b) of [Cohen4] p. 361. See log1 24870. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (𝐵 logb 1) = 0)
Theorem	elogb 25049	The general logarithm of a number to the base being Euler's constant is the natural logarithm of the number. Put another way, using e as the base in logb is the same as log. Definition in [Cohen4] p. 352. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler and AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) → (e logb 𝐴) = (log‘𝐴))
Theorem	logbchbase 25050	Change of base for logarithms. Property in [Cohen4] p. 367. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐴 logb 𝑋) = ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) / (𝐵 logb 𝐴)))
Theorem	relogbval 25051	Value of the general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	relogbcl 25052	Closure of the general logarithm with a positive real base on positive reals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relogbzcl 25053	Closure of the general logarithm with integer base on positive reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relogbreexp 25054	Power law for the general logarithm for real powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of a real number is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. Property 4 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸)) = (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbzexp 25055	Power law for the general logarithm for integer powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of an integer is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑁)) = (𝑁 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbmul 25056	The logarithm of the product of two positive real numbers is the sum of logarithms. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbmulexp 25057	The logarithm of the product of a positive real and a positive real number to the power of a real number is the sum of the logarithm of the first real number and the scaled logarithm of the second real number. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸))) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶))))
Theorem	relogbdiv 25058	The logarithm of the quotient of two positive real numbers is the difference of logarithms. Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 / 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) − (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbexp 25059	Identity law for general logarithm: the logarithm of a power to the base is the exponent. Property 6 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	nnlogbexp 25060	Identity law for general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	logbrec 25061	Logarithm of a reciprocal changes sign. See logrec 25042. Particular case of Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb (1 / 𝐴)) = -(𝐵 logb 𝐴))
Theorem	logbleb 25062	The general logarithm function is monotone/increasing. See logleb 24887. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by AV, 31-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ≤ (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	logblt 25063	The general logarithm function is strictly monotone/increasing. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 377. See logltb 24884. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) < (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	relogbcxp 25064	Identity law for the general logarithm for real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℝ+ ∖ {1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑐𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	cxplogb 25065	Identity law for the general logarithm. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵↑𝑐(𝐵 logb 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	relogbcxpb 25066	The logarithm is the inverse of the exponentiation. Observation in [Cohen4] p. 348. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵↑𝑐𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	logbmpt 25067*	The general logarithm to a fixed base regarded as mapping. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (curry logb ‘𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((log‘𝑦) / (log‘𝐵))))
Theorem	logbf 25068	The general logarithm to a fixed base regarded as function. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (curry logb ‘𝐵):(ℂ ∖ {0})⟶ℂ)
Theorem	logbfval 25069	The general logarithm of a complex number to a fixed base. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((curry logb ‘𝐵)‘𝑋) = (𝐵 logb 𝑋))
Theorem	relogbf 25070	The general logarithm to a real base greater than 1 regarded as function restricted to the positive integers. Property in [Cohen4] p. 349. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 1 < 𝐵) → ((curry logb ‘𝐵) ↾ ℝ+):ℝ+⟶ℝ)
Theorem	logblog 25071	The general logarithm to the base being Euler's constant regarded as function is the natural logarithm. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (curry logb ‘e) = log
Theorem	logbgt0b 25072	The logarithm of a positive real number to a real base greater than 1 is positive iff the number is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 1 < 𝐵)) → (0 < (𝐵 logb 𝐴) ↔ 1 < 𝐴))
Theorem	logbgcd1irr 25073	The logarithm of an integer greater than 1 to an integer base greater than 1 is an irrational number if the argument and the base are relatively prime. For example, (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) (see 2logb9irr 25074). (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	2logb9irr 25074	Example for logbgcd1irr 25073. The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	logbprmirr 25075	The logarithm of a prime to a different prime base is an irrational number. For example, (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) (see 2logb3irr 25076). (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	2logb3irr 25076	Example for logbprmirr 25075. The logarithm of three to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	2logb9irrALT 25077	Alternate proof of 2logb9irr 25074: The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 25078	The square root of two to the power of the logarithm of nine to base two is three. (√‘2) and (2 logb 9) are irrational numbers (see sqrt2irr0 15464 resp. 2logb9irr 25074), satisfying the statement in 2irrexpqALT 25079. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((√‘2)↑𝑐(2 logb 9)) = 3
Theorem	2irrexpqALT 25079*	Alternate proof of 2irrexpq 25014: There exist irrational numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 such that (𝑎↑𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "constructive proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. In contrast to 2irrexpq 25014, this is a constructive proof because it is based on two explicitly named irrational numbers (√‘2) and (2 logb 9), see sqrt2irr0 15464, 2logb9irr 25074 and sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 25078. Therefore, this proof is also acceptable/usable in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)∃𝑏 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ
14.3.6  Theorems of Pythagoras, isosceles triangles, and intersecting chords
Theorem	angval 25080*	Define the angle function, which takes two complex numbers, treated as vectors from the origin, and returns the angle between them, in the range ( − π, π]. To convert from the geometry notation, 𝑚𝐴𝐵𝐶, the measure of the angle with legs 𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐵 where 𝐶 is more counterclockwise for positive angles, is represented by ((𝐶 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐵)). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (ℑ‘(log‘(𝐵 / 𝐴))))
Theorem	angcan 25081*	Cancel a constant multiplier in the angle function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0)) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴)𝐹(𝐶 · 𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	angneg 25082*	Cancel a negative sign in the angle function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → (-𝐴𝐹-𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	angvald 25083*	The (signed) angle between two vectors is the argument of their quotient. Deduction form of angval 25080. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑌 / 𝑋))))
Theorem	angcld 25084*	The (signed) angle between two vectors is in (-π(,]π). Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ (-π(,]π))
Theorem	angrteqvd 25085*	Two vectors are at a right angle iff their quotient is purely imaginary. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)} ↔ (ℜ‘(𝑌 / 𝑋)) = 0))
Theorem	cosangneg2d 25086*	The cosine of the angle between 𝑋 and -𝑌 is the negative of that between 𝑋 and 𝑌. If A, B and C are collinear points, this implies that the cosines of DBA and DBC sum to zero, i.e., that DBA and DBC are supplementary. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (cos‘(𝑋𝐹-𝑌)) = -(cos‘(𝑋𝐹𝑌)))
Theorem	angrtmuld 25087*	Perpendicularity of two vectors does not change under rescaling the second. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 / 𝑌) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)} ↔ (𝑋𝐹𝑍) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)}))
Theorem	ang180lem1 25088*	Lemma for ang180 25093. Show that the "revolution number" 𝑁 is an integer, using efeq1 24814 to show that since the product of the three arguments 𝐴, 1 / (1 − 𝐴), (𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴 is -1, the sum of the logarithms must be an integer multiple of 2πi away from πi = log(-1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑇 / i) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	ang180lem2 25089*	Lemma for ang180 25093. Show that the revolution number 𝑁 is strictly between -2 and 1. Both bounds are established by iterating using the bounds on the imaginary part of the logarithm, logimcl 24854, but the resulting bound gives only 𝑁 ≤ 1 for the upper bound. The case 𝑁 = 1 is not ruled out here, but it is in some sense an "edge case" that can only happen under very specific conditions; in particular we show that all the angle arguments 𝐴, 1 / (1 − 𝐴), (𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴 must lie on the negative real axis, which is a contradiction because clearly if 𝐴 is negative then the other two are positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (-2 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < 1))
Theorem	ang180lem3 25090*	Lemma for ang180 25093. Since ang180lem1 25088 shows that 𝑁 is an integer and ang180lem2 25089 shows that 𝑁 is strictly between -2 and 1, it follows that 𝑁 ∈ {-1, 0}, and these two cases correspond to the two possible values for 𝑇. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → 𝑇 ∈ {-(i · π), (i · π)})
Theorem	ang180lem4 25091*	Lemma for ang180 25093. Reduce the statement to one variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ((((1 − 𝐴)𝐹1) + (𝐴𝐹(𝐴 − 1))) + (1𝐹𝐴)) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	ang180lem5 25092*	Lemma for ang180 25093: Reduce the statement to two variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ((((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹𝐴) + (𝐵𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴))) + (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	ang180 25093*	The sum of angles 𝑚𝐴𝐵𝐶 + 𝑚𝐵𝐶𝐴 + 𝑚𝐶𝐴𝐵 in a triangle adds up to either π or -π, i.e. 180 degrees. (The sign is due to the two possible orientations of vertex arrangement and our signed notion of angle). This is Metamath 100 proof #27. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)) → ((((𝐶 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐵)) + ((𝐴 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐶))) + ((𝐵 − 𝐴)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐴))) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	lawcoslem1 25094	Lemma for lawcos 25095. Here we prove the law for a point at the origin and two distinct points U and V, using an expanded version of the signed angle expression on the complex plane. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑈 − 𝑉))↑2) = ((((abs‘𝑈)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑉)↑2)) − (2 · (((abs‘𝑈) · (abs‘𝑉)) · ((ℜ‘(𝑈 / 𝑉)) / (abs‘(𝑈 / 𝑉)))))))
Theorem	lawcos 25095*	Law of cosines (also known as the Al-Kashi theorem or the generalized Pythagorean theorem, or the cosine formula or cosine rule). Given three distinct points A, B, and C, prove a relationship between their segment lengths. This theorem is expressed using the complex number plane as a plane, where 𝐹 is the signed angle construct (as used in ang180 25093), 𝑋 is the distance of line segment BC, 𝑌 is the distance of line segment AC, 𝑍 is the distance of line segment AB, and 𝑂 is the signed angle m/__ BCA on the complex plane. We translate triangle ABC to move C to the origin (C-C), B to U=(B-C), and A to V=(A-C), then use lemma lawcoslem1 25094 to prove this algebraically simpler case. The Metamath convention is to use a signed angle; in this case the sign doesn't matter because we use the cosine of the angle (see cosneg 15360). The Pythagorean theorem pythag 25096 is a special case of the law of cosines. The theorem's expression and approach were suggested by Mario Carneiro. This is Metamath 100 proof #94. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 12-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) → (𝑍↑2) = (((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)) − (2 · ((𝑋 · 𝑌) · (cos‘𝑂)))))
Theorem	pythag 25096*	Pythagorean theorem. Given three distinct points A, B, and C that form a right triangle (with the right angle at C), prove a relationship between their segment lengths. This theorem is expressed using the complex number plane as a plane, where 𝐹 is the signed angle construct (as used in ang180 25093), 𝑋 is the distance of line segment BC, 𝑌 is the distance of line segment AC, 𝑍 is the distance of line segment AB (the hypotenuse), and 𝑂 is the signed right angle m/__ BCA. We use the law of cosines lawcos 25095 to prove this, along with simple trigonometry facts like coshalfpi 24758 and cosneg 15360. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 13-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)}) → (𝑍↑2) = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)))
Theorem	isosctrlem1 25097	Lemma for isosctr 25100. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 30-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π)
Theorem	isosctrlem2 25098	Lemma for isosctr 25100. Corresponds to the case where one vertex is at 0, another at 1 and the third lies on the unit circle. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 31-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) = (ℑ‘(log‘(-𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))))
Theorem	isosctrlem3 25099*	Lemma for isosctr 25100. Corresponds to the case where one vertex is at 0. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 1-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = (abs‘𝐵)) → (-𝐴𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹-𝐵))
Theorem	isosctr 25100*	Isosceles triangle theorem. This is Metamath 100 proof #65. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 1-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) → ((𝐶 − 𝐴)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵)))