P. 303 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 30201-30300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dfpth2 30201	Alternate definition for a pair of classes/functions to be a path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 4-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1...(♯‘𝐹))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) ∉ (𝑃 “ (1..^(♯‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	pthhashvtx 30202	A graph containing a path has at least as many vertices as there are edges in the path. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 5-Oct-2023.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ≤ (♯‘𝑉))
Theorem	pthdifv 30203	The vertices of a path are distinct (except the first and last vertex), so the restricted vertex function is one-to-one. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝑃 ↾ (1...(♯‘𝐹))):(1...(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	2pthnloop 30204*	A path of length at least 2 does not contain a loop. In contrast, a path of length 1 can contain/be a loop, see lppthon 30629. (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐹)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))2 ≤ (♯‘(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))
Theorem	upgr2pthnlp 30205*	A path of length at least 2 in a pseudograph does not contain a loop. (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 1 < (♯‘𝐹)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(♯‘(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))) = 2)
Theorem	spthdifv 30206	The vertices of a simple path are distinct, so the vertex function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	spthdep 30207	A simple path (at least of length 1) has different start and end points (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 0) → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	pthdepisspth 30208	A path with different start and end points is a simple path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkdvdelem 30209*	Lemma for upgrwlkdvde 30210. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} → Fun ◡𝐹))
Theorem	upgrwlkdvde 30210	In a pseudograph, all edges of a walk consisting of different vertices are different. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 30211. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	upgrspthswlk 30211*	The set of simple paths in a pseudograph, expressed as walk. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, since a walk with distinct vertices does not need to be a trail: let E = { p0, p1, p2 } be a hyperedge, then ( p0, e, p1, e, p2 ) is walk with distinct vertices, but not with distinct edges. Therefore, E is not a trail and, by definition, also no path. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (SPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑝)})
Theorem	upgrwlkdvspth 30212	A walk consisting of different vertices is a simple path. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 30211. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthsonfval 30213*	The set of paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	spthson 30214*	The set of simple paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	ispthson 30215	Properties of a pair of functions to be a path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	isspthson 30216	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthsonprop 30217	Properties of a path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	spthonprop 30218	Properties of a simple path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthonispth 30219	A path between two vertices is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthontrlon 30220	A path between two vertices is a trail between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	pthonpth 30221	A path is a path between its endpoints. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))𝑃)
Theorem	isspthonpth 30222	A pair of functions is a simple path between two given vertices iff it is a simple path starting and ending at the two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	spthonisspth 30223	A simple path between to vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonpthon 30224	A simple path between two vertices is a path between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonepeq 30225	The endpoints of a simple path between two vertices are equal iff the path is of length 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (♯‘𝐹) = 0))
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem1 30226	Lemma 1 for uhgrwkspth 30228. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem2 30227	Lemma 2 for uhgrwkspth 30228. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ ((♯‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	uhgrwkspth 30228	Any walk of length 1 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2wlkneq 30229	The vertices and edges are pairwise different in a walk of length 2 in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) ∧ ((♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → (((𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘1) ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2) ∧ (𝑃‘1) ≠ (𝑃‘2)) ∧ (𝐹‘0) ≠ (𝐹‘1)))
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem1 30230	Lemma 1 for usgr2wlkspth 30232. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem2 30231	Lemma 2 for usgr2wlkspth 30232. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspth 30232	In a simple graph, any walk of length 2 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2trlncl 30233	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 does not start and end at the same vertex. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2)))
Theorem	usgr2trlspth 30234	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthspth 30235	In a simple graph, any path of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthlem 30236*	Lemma for usgr2pth 30237. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(♯‘𝐹))–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) → ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧}))))
Theorem	usgr2pth 30237*	In a simple graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧})))))
Theorem	usgr2pth0 30238*	In a simply graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑧} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑧, 𝑦})))))
Theorem	pthdlem1 30239*	Lemma 1 for pthd 30242. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2lem 30240*	Lemma for pthdlem2 30241. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐼 = 0 ∨ 𝐼 = 𝑅)) → (𝑃‘𝐼) ∉ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2 30241*	Lemma 2 for pthd 30242. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃 “ {0, 𝑅}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅))) = ∅)
Theorem	pthd 30242*	Two words representing a trail which also represent a path in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    &   ⊢ (♯‘𝐹) = 𝑅    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	subgrpth 30243	If a path exists in a subgraph of a graph 𝐺, then that path also exists in 𝐺. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → (𝐹(Paths‘𝑆)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃))
17.3.5  Closed walks
Syntax	cclwlks 30244	Extend class notation with closed walks (of a graph).
class ClWalks
Definition	df-clwlks 30245*	Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph). According to definition 4 in [Huneke] p. 2: "A walk of length n on (a graph) G is an ordered sequence v0 , v1 , ... v(n) of vertices such that v(i) and v(i+1) are neighbors (i.e are connected by an edge). We say the walk is closed if v(n) = v0". According to the definition of a walk as two mappings f from { 0 , ... , ( n - 1 ) } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices, a closed walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(0)) p(1) e(f(1)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n-1)) p(n)=p(0). Notice that by this definition, a single vertex can be considered as a closed walk of length 0, see also 0clwlk 30608. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ClWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	clwlks 30246*	The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	isclwlk 30247	A pair of functions represents a closed walk iff it represents a walk in which the first vertex is equal to the last vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkiswlk 30248	A closed walk is a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	clwlkwlk 30249	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkswks 30250	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ (Walks‘𝐺)
Theorem	isclwlke 30251*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	isclwlkupgr 30252*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in a pseudograph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 28-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcomp 30253*	A closed walk expressed by properties of its components. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑇)) → (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcompim 30254*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	upgrclwlkcompim 30255*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkcompbp 30256	Basic properties of the components of a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkl1loop 30257	A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 1) → ((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘1) ∧ {(𝑃‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)))
17.3.6  Circuits and cycles
Syntax	ccrcts 30258	Extend class notation with circuits (in a graph).
class Circuits
Syntax	ccycls 30259	Extend class notation with cycles (in a graph).
class Cycles
Definition	df-crcts 30260*	Define the set of all circuits (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit can be a closed walk allowing repetitions of vertices but not edges"; according to Wikipedia ("Glossary of graph theory terms", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_graph_theory_terms, 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit may refer to ... a trail (a closed tour without repeated edges), ...". Following Bollobas ("A trail whose endvertices coincide (a closed trail) is called a circuit.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5.), a circuit is a closed trail without repeated edges. So the circuit is also represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Circuits = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Definition	df-cycls 30261*	Define the set of all (simple) cycles (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A simple cycle may be defined either as a closed walk with no repetitions of vertices and edges allowed, other than the repetition of the starting and ending vertex." According to Bollobas: "If a walk W = x0 x1 ... x(l) is such that l >= 3, x0=x(l), and the vertices x(i), 0 < i < l, are distinct from each other and x0, then W is said to be a cycle." See Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5. However, since a walk consisting of distinct vertices (except the first and the last vertex) is a path, a cycle can be defined as path whose first and last vertices coincide. So a cycle is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Cycles = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	crcts 30262*	The set of circuits (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Circuits‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	cycls 30263*	The set of cycles (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Cycles‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	iscrct 30264	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a circuit (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a circuit iff it is a closed trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	iscycl 30265	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a cycle (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a cycle iff it is a closed path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctprop 30266	The properties of a circuit: A circuit is a closed trail. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	cyclprop 30267	The properties of a cycle: A cycle is a closed path. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctisclwlk 30268	A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctistrl 30269	A circuit is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctiswlk 30270	A circuit is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclispth 30271	A cycle is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	subgrcycl 30272	If a cycle exists in a subgraph of a graph 𝐺, then that cycle also exists in 𝐺. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝑆)𝑃 → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	cycliswlk 30273	A cycle is a walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cycliscrct 30274	A cycle is a circuit. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclnumvtx 30275	The number of vertices of a (non-trivial) cycle is the number of edges in the cycle. (Contributed by AV, 5-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((1 ≤ (♯‘𝐹) ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘ran 𝑃) = (♯‘𝐹))
Theorem	cyclnspth 30276	A (non-trivial) cycle is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ≠ ∅ → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	pthisspthorcycl 30277	A path is either a simple path or a cycle (or both). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 20-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∨ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	pthspthcyc 30278	A pair ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ represents a path if it represents either a simple path or a cycle. The exclusivity only holds for non-trivial paths (𝐹 ≠ ∅), see cyclnspth 30276. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∨ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	spthcycl 30279	A walk is a trivial path if and only if it is both a simple path and a cycle. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹 = ∅) ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	cyclispthon 30280	A cycle is a path starting and ending at its first vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘0))𝑃)
Theorem	lfgrn1cycl 30281*	In a loop-free graph there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 1))
Theorem	usgr2trlncrct 30282	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is not a circuit. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	umgrn1cycl 30283	In a multigraph graph (with no loops!) there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 1)
Theorem	uspgrn2crct 30284	In a simple pseudograph there are no circuits with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 2)
Theorem	usgrn2cycl 30285	In a simple graph there are no cycles with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (♯‘𝐹) ≠ 2)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem1 30286	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 1) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem2 30287*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑆))) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘(𝐽 + 𝑆)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem3 30288*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)...𝑁)) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘((𝐽 + 𝑆) − 𝑁)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem4 30289*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^(𝑁 − 𝑆))if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem5 30290*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem6 30291*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 = (𝑁 − 𝑆)) → if-((𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽)) = {(𝑄‘𝐽)}, {(𝑄‘𝐽), (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem7 30292*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 30297. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshlem1 30293	Lemma for crctcsh 30300. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	crctcshlem2 30294	Lemma for crctcsh 30300. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐻) = 𝑁)
Theorem	crctcshlem3 30295*	Lemma for crctcsh 30300. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V))
Theorem	crctcshlem4 30296*	Lemma for crctcsh 30300. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 = 0) → (𝐻 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑄 = 𝑃))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0 30297*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 0) → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshwlk 30298*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshtrl 30299*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a trail ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Trails‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcsh 30300*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑄)