P. 454 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 45301-45400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mnuprdlem3 45301*	Lemma for mnuprd 45303. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 𝑖 ∈ 𝑣)
Theorem	mnuprdlem4 45302*	Lemma for mnuprd 45303. General case. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprd 45303*	Minimal universes are closed under pairing. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuunid 45304*	Minimal universes are closed under union. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuund 45305*	Minimal universes are closed under binary unions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrcld 45306*	Minimal universes contain the elements of their elements. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrd 45307*	Minimal universes are transitive. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurndlem1 45308*	Lemma for mnurnd 45310. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})(𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnurndlem2 45309*	Lemma for mnurnd 45310. Deduction theorem input. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurnd 45310*	Minimal universes contain ranges of functions from an element of the universe to the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnugrud 45311*	Minimal universes are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grumnudlem 45312*	Lemma for grumnud 45313. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ({⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ∃𝑑(∪ 𝑑 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑑)} ∩ (𝐺 × 𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐺) → (𝑖𝐹ℎ ↔ ∃𝑗(∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ ((ℎ ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧) ∧ (∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnud 45313*	Grothendieck universes are minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnueq 45314*	The class of Grothendieck universes is equal to the class of minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}
21.42.3.3  Primitive equivalent of ax-groth
Theorem	expandan 45315	Expand conjunction to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃))
Theorem	expandexn 45316	Expand an existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	expandral 45317	Expand a restricted universal quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrexn 45318	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrex 45319	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	expanduniss 45320*	Expand ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ismnuprim 45321*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 in ismnu 45288 using only primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	rr-grothprimbi 45322*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" using only primitives. The right side (without the outermost universal quantifier) is proven as rr-grothprim 45327. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤)))))))))))))
Theorem	inagrud 45323	Inaccessible levels of the cumulative hierarchy are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Inacc)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐼) ∈ Univ)
Theorem	inaex 45324*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every ordinal is contained in an inaccessible ordinal. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ Inacc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	gruex 45325*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	rr-groth 45326*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10908 using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	rr-grothprim 45327*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10908 using only primitives. This uses only 123 symbols, which is significantly less than the previous record of 163 established by grothprim 10919 (which uses some defined symbols, and requires 229 symbols if expanded to primitives). (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	ismnushort 45328*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 and 𝑧 in ismnu 45288 in a shorter form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑈 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)) ↔ (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	dfuniv2 45329*	Alternative definition of Univ using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))}
Theorem	rr-grothshortbi 45330*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" in a short form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))))
Theorem	rr-grothshort 45331*	A shorter equivalent of ax-groth 10908 than rr-groth 45326 using a few more simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)))
21.43  Mathbox for Steve Rodriguez
21.43.1  Miscellanea
Theorem	nanorxor 45332	'nand' is equivalent to the equivalence of inclusive and exclusive or. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
Theorem	undisjrab 45333	Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4260. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
Theorem	iso0 45334	The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅)
Theorem	ssrecnpr 45335	ℝ is a subset of both ℝ and ℂ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → ℝ ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	seff 45336	Let set 𝑆 be the real or complex numbers. Then the exponential function restricted to 𝑆 is a mapping from 𝑆 to 𝑆. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ↾ 𝑆):𝑆⟶𝑆)
Theorem	sblpnf 45337	The infinity ball in the absolute value metric is just the whole space. 𝑆 analogue of blpnf 24716. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑃(ball‘𝐷)+∞) = 𝑆)
Theorem	prmunb2 45338*	The primes are unbounded. This generalizes prmunb 17092 to real 𝐴 with arch 12603 and lttrd 11471: every real is less than some positive integer, itself less than some prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 < 𝑝)
21.43.2  Ratio test for infinite series convergence and divergence
Theorem	dvgrat 45339*	Ratio test for divergence of a complex infinite series. See e.g. remark "if (abs‘((𝑎‘(𝑛 + 1)) / (𝑎‘𝑛))) ≥ 1 for all large n..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test#The_test. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∉ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgdvgrat 45340*	Ratio test for convergence and divergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝑅 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 converges to less than one, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number; and if 𝑅 converges greater then the sum diverges. This combined form of cvgrat 16052 and dvgrat 45339 directly uses the limit of the ratio. (It also demonstrates how to use climi2 15678 and absltd 15599 to transform a limit to an inequality cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2215191 15599, and how to use r19.29a 3170 in a similar fashion to Mario Carneiro's proof sketch with rexlimdva 3163 at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/2RPikOiXLMo 3163.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 < 1 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	radcnvrat 45341*	Let 𝐿 be the limit, if one exists, of the ratio (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))) (as in the ratio test cvgdvgrat 45340) as 𝑘 increases. Then the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)) is (1 / 𝐿) if 𝐿 is nonzero. Proof "The limit involved in the ratio test..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence 45340 —a few lines that evidently hide quite an involved process to confirm. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐴‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (1 / 𝐿))
21.43.3  Multiples
Theorem	reldvds 45342	The divides relation is in fact a relation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Rel ∥
Theorem	nznngen 45343	All positive integers in the set of multiples of n, nℤ, are the absolute value of n or greater. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ ℕ) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘(abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	nzss 45344	The set of multiples of m, mℤ, is a subset of those of n, nℤ, iff n divides m. Lemma 2.1(a) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ⊆ ( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	nzin 45345	The intersection of the set of multiples of m, mℤ, and those of n, nℤ, is the set of multiples of their least common multiple. Roughly Lemma 2.1(c) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5 and Problem 1(b) of https://people.math.binghamton.edu/mazur/teach/40107/40107h16sol.pdf p. 1, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 lcm 𝑁)}))
Theorem	nzprmdif 45346	Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)})))
Theorem	hashnzfz 45347	Special case of hashdvds 16952: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁))))
Theorem	hashnzfz2 45348	Special case of hashnzfz 45347: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)))
Theorem	hashnzfzclim 45349*	As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 45347 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀))
21.43.4  Function operations
Theorem	caofcan 45350*	Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11953 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))
Theorem	ofsubid 45351	Function analogue of subid 11577. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0}))
Theorem	ofmul12 45352	Function analogue of mul12 11475. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘f · (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻)))
Theorem	ofdivrec 45353	Function analogue of divrec 11990, a division analogue of ofnegsub 12318. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘f · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘f / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f / 𝐺))
Theorem	ofdivcan4 45354	Function analogue of divcan4 12001. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∘f / 𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	ofdivdiv2 45355	Function analogue of divdiv2 12029. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘f / (𝐺 ∘f / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻) ∘f / 𝐺))
21.43.5  Calculus
Theorem	lhe4.4ex1a 45356	Example of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, part two (ftc2 26364): ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3). Section 4.4 example 1a of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 311. (The book teaches ftc2 26364 as simply the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", then ftc1 26362 as the "Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus".) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Steve Rodriguez, 31-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3)
Theorem	dvsconst 45357	Derivative of a constant function on the real or complex numbers. The function may return a complex 𝐴 even if 𝑆 is ℝ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑆 D (𝑆 × {𝐴})) = (𝑆 × {0}))
Theorem	dvsid 45358	Derivative of the identity function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D ( I ↾ 𝑆)) = (𝑆 × {1}))
Theorem	dvsef 45359	Derivative of the exponential function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 12-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D (exp ↾ 𝑆)) = (exp ↾ 𝑆))
Theorem	expgrowthi 45360*	Exponential growth and decay model. See expgrowth 45362 for more information. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌))
Theorem	dvconstbi 45361*	The derivative of a function on 𝑆 is zero iff it is a constant function. Roughly a biconditional 𝑆 analogue of dvconst 26237 and dveq0 26320. Corresponds to integration formula "∫0 d𝑥 = 𝐶 " in section 4.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 278. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = (𝑆 × {0}) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑆 × {𝑐})))
Theorem	expgrowth 45362*	Exponential growth and decay model. The derivative of a function y of variable t equals a constant k times y itself, iff y equals some constant C times the exponential of kt. This theorem and expgrowthi 45360 illustrate one of the simplest and most crucial classes of differential equations, equations that relate functions to their derivatives. Section 6.3 of [Strang] p. 242 calls y' = ky "the most important differential equation in applied mathematics". In the field of population ecology it is known as the Malthusian growth model or exponential law, and C, k, and t correspond to initial population size, growth rate, and time respectively (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusian_growth_model 45360); and in finance, the model appears in a similar role in continuous compounding with C as the initial amount of money. In exponential decay models, k is often expressed as the negative of a positive constant λ. Here y' is given as (𝑆 D 𝑌), C as 𝑐, and ky as ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌). (𝑆 × {𝐾}) is the constant function that maps any real or complex input to k and ∘f · is multiplication as a function operation. The leftward direction of the biconditional is as given in http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MA221-2.1.1.pdf 45360 pp. 1-2, which also notes the reverse direction ("While we will not prove this here, it turns out that these are the only functions that satisfy this equation."). The rightward direction is Theorem 5.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 375 (which notes " C is the initial value of y, and k is the proportionality constant. Exponential growth occurs when k > 0, and exponential decay occurs when k < 0."); its proof here closely follows the proof of y' = y in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Growth_Equation/Special_Case 45360. Statements for this and expgrowthi 45360 formulated by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝑐 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))))
21.43.6  The generalized binomial coefficient operation
Syntax	cbcc 45363	Extend class notation to include the generalized binomial coefficient operation.
class C𝑐
Definition	df-bcc 45364*	Define a generalized binomial coefficient operation, which unlike df-bc 14447 allows complex numbers for the first argument. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ C𝑐 = (𝑐 ∈ ℂ, 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑐 FallFac 𝑘) / (!‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bccval 45365	Value of the generalized binomial coefficient, 𝐶 choose 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = ((𝐶 FallFac 𝐾) / (!‘𝐾)))
Theorem	bcccl 45366	Closure of the generalized binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	bcc0 45367	The generalized binomial coefficient 𝐶 choose 𝐾 is zero iff 𝐶 is an integer between zero and (𝐾 − 1) inclusive. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = 0 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))))
Theorem	bccp1k 45368	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 + 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) · ((𝐶 − 𝐾) / (𝐾 + 1))))
Theorem	bccm1k 45369	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 − 1), when 𝐶 is not (𝐾 − 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {(𝐾 − 1)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) / ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) / 𝐾)))
Theorem	bccn0 45370	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 0. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐0) = 1)
Theorem	bccn1 45371	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 1. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐1) = 𝐶)
Theorem	bccbc 45372	The binomial coefficient and generalized binomial coefficient are equal when their arguments are nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝑐𝐾) = (𝑁C𝐾))
21.43.7  Binomial series
Theorem	uzmptshftfval 45373*	When 𝐹 is a maps-to function on some set of upper integers 𝑍 that returns a set 𝐵, (𝐹 shift 𝑁) is another maps-to function on the shifted set of upper integers 𝑊. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 − 𝑁) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 shift 𝑁) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	dvradcnv2 45374*	The radius of convergence of the (formal) derivative 𝐻 of the power series 𝐺 is (at least) as large as the radius of convergence of 𝐺. This version of dvradcnv 26748 uses a shifted version of 𝐻 to match the sum form of (ℂ D 𝐹) in pserdv2 26757 (and shows how to use uzmptshftfval 45373 to shift a maps-to function on a set of upper integers). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑛 · (𝐴‘𝑛)) · (𝑋↑(𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝑋) < 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐻) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	binomcxplemwb 45375	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. The lemma in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 − 𝐾) · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)) + ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) · (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)))) = (𝐶 · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnn0 45376*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. When 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer, the binomial's finite sum value by the standard binomial theorem binom 15999 equals this generalized infinite sum: the generalized binomial coefficient and exponentiation operators give exactly the same values in the standard index set (0...𝐶), and when the index set is widened beyond 𝐶 the additional values are just zeroes. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxplemrat 45377*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. As 𝑘 increases, this ratio's absolute value converges to one. Part of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof (proven for the inverse ratio, which we later show is no problem). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐶 − 𝑘) / (𝑘 + 1)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemfrat 45378*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. binomcxplemrat 45377 implies that when 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the absolute value of the ratio ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)) converges to one. The rest of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemradcnv 45379*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. By binomcxplemfrat 45378 and radcnvrat 45341 the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)) is one. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑅 = 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemdvbinom 45380*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. By the power and chain rules, calculate the derivative of ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐 -𝐶), with respect to 𝑏 in the disk of convergence 𝐷. We later multiply the derivative in the later binomcxplemdvsum 45382 by this derivative to show that ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) (with a nonnegated 𝐶) and the later sum, since both at 𝑏 = 0 equal one, are the same. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (ℂ D (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐 -𝐶))) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( -𝐶 · ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐( -𝐶 − 1)))))
Theorem	binomcxplemcvg 45381*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. The sum in binomcxplemnn0 45376 and its derivative (see the next theorem, binomcxplemdvsum 45382) converge, as long as their base 𝐽 is within the disk of convergence. Part of remark "This convergence allows us to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) → (seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ seq1( + , (𝐸‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	binomcxplemdvsum 45382*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. The derivative of the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 45376. Part of remark "This convergence allows to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D 𝑃) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐸‘𝑏)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnotnn0 45383*	Lemma for binomcxp 45384. When 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 45376 —which we will call 𝑃 —is a convergent power series: its base 𝑏 is always of smaller absolute value than the radius of convergence. pserdv2 26757 gives the derivative of 𝑃, which by dvradcnv 26748 also converges in that radius. When 𝐴 is fixed at one, (𝐴 + 𝑏) times that derivative equals (𝐶 · 𝑃) and fraction (𝑃 / ((𝐴 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶)) is always defined with derivative zero, so the fraction is a constant—specifically one, because ((1 + 0)↑𝑐𝐶) = 1. Thus ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) = (𝑃‘𝑏). Finally, let 𝑏 be (𝐵 / 𝐴), and multiply both the binomial ((1 + (𝐵 / 𝐴))↑𝑐𝐶) and the sum (𝑃‘(𝐵 / 𝐴)) by (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) to get the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxp 45384*	Generalize the binomial theorem binom 15999 to positive real summand 𝐴, real summand 𝐵, and complex exponent 𝐶. Proof in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Advanced_Calculus 15999; see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series 15999, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem 15999 (sections "Newton's generalized binomial theorem" and "Future generalizations"), and proof "General Binomial Theorem" in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem 15999. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
21.44  Mathbox for Andrew Salmon
21.44.1  Principia Mathematica * 10
Theorem	pm10.12 45385*	Theorem *10.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. In *10, this is treated as an axiom, and the proofs in *10 are based on this theorem. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.14 45386	Theorem *10.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.251 45387	Theorem *10.251 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.252 45388	Theorem *10.252 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.253 45389	Theorem *10.253 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	albitr 45390	Theorem *10.301 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 151. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.42 45391	Theorem *10.42 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.52 45392*	Theorem *10.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.53 45393	Theorem *10.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.541 45394*	Theorem *10.541 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.542 45395*	Theorem *10.542 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.55 45396	Theorem *10.55 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.56 45397	Theorem *10.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.57 45398	Theorem *10.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
21.44.2  Principia Mathematica * 11
Theorem	2alanimi 45399	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)
Theorem	2al2imi 45400	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒))