| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 454 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | e20an 45301 | Conjunction form of e20 45300. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee20an 45302 | e20an 45301 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | e21 45303 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6ci 72). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e21an 45304 | Conjunction form of e21 45303. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee21an 45305 | e21an 45304 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | e333 45306 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e33 45307 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e33an 45308 | Conjunction form of e33 45307. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee33an 45309 | e33an 45308 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e3 45310 | Meta-connective form of syl8 77. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e3bi 45311 | Biconditional form of e3 45310. syl8ib 259 is e3bi 45311 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e3bir 45312 | Right biconditional form of e3 45310. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e03 45313 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee03 45314 | e03 45313 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e03an 45315 | Conjunction form of e03 45313. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee03an 45316 | Conjunction form of ee03 45314. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e30 45317 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee30 45318 | e30 45317 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e30an 45319 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee30an 45320 | Conjunction form of ee30 45318. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e13 45321 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e13an 45322 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee13an 45323 | e13an 45322 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e31 45324 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee31 45325 | e31 45324 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e31an 45326 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee31an 45327 | e31an 45326 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e23 45328 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl10 80). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e23an 45329 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee23an 45330 | e23an 45329 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e32 45331 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee32 45332 | e32 45331 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e32an 45333 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee32an 45334 | e33an 45308 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e123 45335 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee123 45336 | e123 45335 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | el123 45337 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ) ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e233 45338 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e323 45339 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e000 45340 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. The non-virtual deduction form of e000 45340 is the virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | e00 45341 | Elimination rule identical to mp2 9. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2 9. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e00an 45342 | Elimination rule identical to mp2an 704. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2an 704. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | eel00cT 45343 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | eelTT 45344 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e0a 45345 | Elimination rule identical to ax-mp 5. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | eelT 45346 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | eel0cT 45347 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | eelT0 45348 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e0bi 45349 | Elimination rule identical to mpbi 233. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbi 233. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | e0bir 45350 | Elimination rule identical to mpbir 234. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbir 234. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | uun0.1 45351 | Convention notation form of un0.1 45352. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | un0.1 45352 | ⊤ is the constant true, a tautology (see df-tru 1566). Kleene's "empty conjunction" is logically equivalent to ⊤. In a virtual deduction we shall interpret ⊤ to be the empty wff or the empty collection of virtual hypotheses. ⊤ in a virtual deduction translated into conventional notation we shall interpret to be Kleene's empty conjunction. If 𝜃 is true given the empty collection of virtual hypotheses and another collection of virtual hypotheses, then it is true given only the other collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ⊤ ▶ 𝜑 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
| Theorem | uunT1 45353 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) Proof was revised to accommodate a possible future version of df-tru 1566. (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 8-May-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT1p1 45354 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT21 45355 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun121 45356 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun121p1 45357 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun132 45358 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun132p1 45359 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | anabss7p1 45360 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. This would have been named uun221 if the zeroth permutation did not exist in set.mm as anabss7 685. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | un10 45361 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , ⊤ ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
| Theorem | un01 45362 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜑 ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
| Theorem | un2122 45363 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun2131 45364 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun2131p1 45365 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uunTT1 45366 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunTT1p1 45367 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunTT1p2 45368 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT11 45369 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT11p1 45370 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT11p2 45371 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12 45372 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12p1 45373 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12p2 45374 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12p3 45375 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12p4 45376 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uunT12p5 45377 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun111 45378 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 3anidm12p1 45379 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. 3anidm12 1442 denotes the deduction which would have been named uun112 if it did not pre-exist in set.mm. This second permutation's name is based on this pre-existing name. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3anidm12p2 45380 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun123 45381 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun123p1 45382 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun123p2 45383 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun123p3 45384 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun123p4 45385 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun2221 45386 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun2221p1 45387 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun2221p2 45388 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3impdirp1 45389 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. Commuted version of 3impdir 1368. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | 3impcombi 45390 | A 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | trsspwALT 45391 | Virtual deduction proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5218. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of dftr4 5218 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | trsspwALT2 45392 | Virtual deduction proof of trsspwALT 45391. This proof is the same as the proof of trsspwALT 45391 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | trsspwALT3 45393 | Short predicate calculus proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5218. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of trsspwALT2 45392, which is the virtual deduction proof trsspwALT 45391 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sspwtr 45394 | Virtual deduction proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5218. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 45394 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sspwtrALT 45395 | Virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 45394. This proof is the same as the proof of sspwtr 45394 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sspwtrALT2 45396 | Short predicate calculus proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5218. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of sspwtrALT 45395, which is the virtual deduction proof sspwtr 45394 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pwtrVD 45397 | Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5424; see pwtrrVD 45398 for the converse. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pwtrrVD 45398 | Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5424; see pwtrVD 45397 for the converse. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Tr 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | suctrALT 45399 | The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html is a Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath proof of suctrALT 45399 using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 45399 is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6438 for the original proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | snssiALTVD 45400 | Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 45401. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |