P. 129 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 12801-12900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eluz2n0 12801	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0)
Theorem	uz3m2nn 12802	An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer, analogous to uz2m1nn 12831. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	uznnssnn 12803	The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ)
Theorem	raluz 12804*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	raluz2 12805*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz 12806*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz2 12807*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2rexuz 12808*	Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	peano2uz 12809	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	peano2uzs 12810	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	peano2uzr 12811	Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzaddcl 12812	Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	nn0pzuz 12813	The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍))
Theorem	uzind4 12814*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4ALT 12815*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 12814 or uzind4ALT 12815 may be used; see comment for nnind 12153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4s 12816*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4s2 12817*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 12816 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4i 12818*	Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. This is a stronger version of uzind4 12814 assuming that 𝜓 holds unconditionally. Notice that 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) implies that the lower bound 𝑀 is an integer (𝑀 ∈ ℤ, see eluzel2 12747). (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzwo 12819*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	uzwo2 12820*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃!𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	nnwo 12821*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwof 12822*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. This version allows 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be present in 𝐴 as long as they are effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwos 12823*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	indstr 12824*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	eluznn0 12825	Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluznn 12826	Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz2b1 12827	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2gt1 12828	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz2b2 12829	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2b3 12830	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2". (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1))
Theorem	uz2m1nn 12831	One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1nuz2 12832	1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)
Theorem	elnn1uz2 12833	A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)))
Theorem	uz2mulcl 12834	Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	indstr2 12835*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	uzinfi 12836	Extract the lower bound of an upper set of integers as its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ inf((ℤ≥‘𝑀), ℝ, < ) = 𝑀
Theorem	nninf 12837	The infimum of the set of positive integers is one. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ, ℝ, < ) = 1
Theorem	nn0inf 12838	The infimum of the set of nonnegative integers is zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ0, ℝ, < ) = 0
Theorem	infssuzle 12839	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers is less than or equal to all members of the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infssuzcl 12840	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers belongs to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	ublbneg 12841*	The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	eqreznegel 12842*	Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	supminf 12843*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of reals is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) ( Revised by AV, 13-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lbzbi 12844*	If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	zsupss 12845*	Any nonempty bounded subset of integers has a supremum in the set. (The proof does not use ax-pre-sup 11094.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	suprzcl2 12846*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is a member of the set. (This version of suprzcl 12563 avoids ax-pre-sup 11094.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	suprzub 12847*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is greater than any member of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	uzsupss 12848*	Any bounded subset of an upper set of integers has a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	nn01to3 12849	A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3))
Theorem	nn0ge2m1nnALT 12850	Alternate proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12461: If a nonnegative integer is greater than or equal to two, the integer decreased by 1 is a positive integer. This version is proved using eluz2 12748, a theorem for upper sets of integers, which are defined later than the positive and nonnegative integers. This proof is, however, much shorter than the proof of nn0ge2m1nn 12461. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.12  Well-ordering principle for bounded-below sets of integers
Theorem	uzwo3 12851*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. This generalization of uzwo2 12820 allows the lower bound 𝐵 to be any real number. See also nnwo 12821 and nnwos 12823. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	zmin 12852*	There is a unique smallest integer greater than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	zmax 12853*	There is a unique largest integer less than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	zbtwnre 12854*	There is a unique integer between a real number and the number plus one. Exercise 5 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	rebtwnz 12855*	There is a unique greatest integer less than or equal to a real number. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝑥 + 1)))
5.4.13  Rational numbers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cq 12856	Extend class notation to include the class of rationals.
class ℚ
Definition	df-q 12857	Define the set of rational numbers. Based on definition of rationals in [Apostol] p. 22. See elq 12858 for the relation "is rational". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ = ( / “ (ℤ × ℕ))
Theorem	elq 12858*	Membership in the set of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	qmulz 12859*	If 𝐴 is rational, then some integer multiple of it is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	znq 12860	The ratio of an integer and a positive integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qre 12861	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zq 12862	An integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 23-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qred 12863	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zssq 12864	The integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℤ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nn0ssq 12865	The nonnegative integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ0 ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nnssq 12866	The positive integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	qssre 12867	The rationals are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	qsscn 12868	The rationals are a subset of the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	qex 12869	The set of rational numbers exists. See also qexALT 12872. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	nnq 12870	A positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qcn 12871	A rational number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	qexALT 12872	Alternate proof of qex 12869. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	qaddcl 12873	Closure of addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qnegcl 12874	Closure law for the negative of a rational. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → -𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qmulcl 12875	Closure of multiplication of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qsubcl 12876	Closure of subtraction of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qreccl 12877	Closure of reciprocal of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qdivcl 12878	Closure of division of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qrevaddcl 12879	Reverse closure law for addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℚ → ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ))
Theorem	nnrecq 12880	The reciprocal of a positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	irradd 12881	The sum of an irrational number and a rational number is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	irrmul 12882	The product of an irrational with a nonzero rational is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	elpq 12883*	A positive rational is the quotient of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	elpqb 12884*	A class is a positive rational iff it is the quotient of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
5.4.14  Existence of the set of complex numbers
Theorem	rpnnen1lem2 12885*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem1 12886*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (ℚ ↑m ℕ))
Theorem	rpnnen1lem3 12887*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ran (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem4 12888*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem5 12889*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) = 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem6 12890*	Lemma for rpnnen1 12891. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑m ℕ)
Theorem	rpnnen1 12891	One half of rpnnen 16146, where we show an injection from the real numbers to sequences of rational numbers. Specifically, we map a real number 𝑥 to the sequence (𝐹‘𝑥):ℕ⟶ℚ (see rpnnen1lem6 12890) such that ((𝐹‘𝑥)‘𝑘) is the largest rational number with denominator 𝑘 that is strictly less than 𝑥. In this manner, we get a monotonically increasing sequence that converges to 𝑥, and since each sequence converges to a unique real number, this mapping from reals to sequences of rational numbers is injective. Note: The ℕ and ℚ existence hypotheses provide for use with either nnex 12141 and qex 12869, or nnexALT 12137 and qexALT 12872. The proof should not be modified to use any of those 4 theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑m ℕ)
Theorem	reexALT 12892	Alternate proof of reex 11107. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ V
Theorem	cnref1o 12893*	There is a natural one-to-one mapping from (ℝ × ℝ) to ℂ, where we map ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ to (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)). In our construction of the complex numbers, this is in fact our definition of ℂ (see df-c 11022), but in the axiomatic treatment we can only show that there is the expected mapping between these two sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→ℂ
Theorem	cnexALT 12894	The set of complex numbers exists. This theorem shows that ax-cnex 11072 is redundant if we assume ax-rep 5221. See also ax-cnex 11072. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	xrex 12895	The set of extended reals exists. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.)
⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
Theorem	mpoaddex 12896*	The addition operation is a set. Version of addex 12897 using maps-to notation , which does not require ax-addf 11095. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) ∈ V
Theorem	addex 12897	The addition operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ + ∈ V
Theorem	mpomulex 12898*	The multiplication operation is a set. Version of mulex 12899 using maps-to notation , which does not require ax-mulf 11096. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) ∈ V
Theorem	mulex 12899	The multiplication operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ · ∈ V
5.5  Order sets
5.5.1  Positive reals (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	crp 12900	Extend class notation to include the class of positive reals.
class ℝ+