P. 401 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40001-40100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	osumcllem8N 40001	Lemma for osumclN 40005. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (PSubCl‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌)) → (𝑌 ∩ 𝑀) = ∅)
Theorem	osumcllem9N 40002	Lemma for osumclN 40005. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (PSubCl‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌)) → 𝑀 = 𝑋)
Theorem	osumcllem10N 40003	Lemma for osumclN 40005. Contradict osumcllem9N 40002. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (PSubCl‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌)) → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋)
Theorem	osumcllem11N 40004	Lemma for osumclN 40005. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (PSubCl‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌))))
Theorem	osumclN 40005	Closure of orthogonal sum. If 𝑋 and 𝑌 are orthogonal closed projective subspaces, then their sum is closed. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (PSubCl‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	pmapojoinN 40006	For orthogonal elements, projective map of join equals projective sum. Compare pmapjoin 39890 where only one direction holds. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑌)))
Theorem	pexmidN 40007	Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which can be shown to be equivalent to (and derivable from) the orthomodular law poml4N 39991. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215, which we prove as a special case of osumclN 40005. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pexmidlem1N 40008	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. Holland's proof implicitly requires 𝑞 ≠ 𝑟, which we prove here. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) → 𝑞 ≠ 𝑟)
Theorem	pexmidlem2N 40009	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑞))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pexmidlem3N 40010	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. Use atom exchange hlatexch1 39433 to swap 𝑝 and 𝑞. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) ∧ 𝑞 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑝)) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pexmidlem4N 40011*	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑀))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pexmidlem5N 40012	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑀) = ∅)
Theorem	pexmidlem6N 40013	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) → 𝑀 = 𝑋)
Theorem	pexmidlem7N 40014	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. Contradict pexmidlem6N 40013. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑋 + {𝑝})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋)
Theorem	pexmidlem8N 40015	Lemma for pexmidN 40007. The contradiction of pexmidlem6N 40013 and pexmidlem7N 40014 shows that there can be no atom 𝑝 that is not in 𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋), which is therefore the whole atom space. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pexmidALTN 40016	Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 39991. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pl42lem1N 40017	Lemma for pl42N 40021. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑍 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊)) → (𝐹‘((((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) ∨ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑉)) = (((((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)) ∩ (𝐹‘𝑍)) + (𝐹‘𝑊)) ∩ (𝐹‘𝑉))))
Theorem	pl42lem2N 40018	Lemma for pl42N 40021. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)) → (((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)) + (((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑊)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝑌) + (𝐹‘𝑉)))) ⊆ (𝐹‘((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑉)))))
Theorem	pl42lem3N 40019	Lemma for pl42N 40021. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)) → (((((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)) ∩ (𝐹‘𝑍)) + (𝐹‘𝑊)) ∩ (𝐹‘𝑉)) ⊆ ((((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)) + (𝐹‘𝑊)) ∩ (((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)) + (𝐹‘𝑉))))
Theorem	pl42lem4N 40020	Lemma for pl42N 40021. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑍 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊)) → (𝐹‘((((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) ∨ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑉)) ⊆ (𝐹‘((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑉))))))
Theorem	pl42N 40021	Law holding in a Hilbert lattice that fails in orthomodular lattice L42 (Figure 7 in [MegPav2000] p. 2366). (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ∧ 𝑍 ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊)) → ((((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) ∨ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑉) ≤ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑉)))))
Syntax	clh 40022	Extend class notation with set of all co-atoms (lattice hyperplanes).
class LHyp
Syntax	claut 40023	Extend class notation with set of all lattice automorphisms.
class LAut
Syntax	cwpointsN 40024	Extend class notation with W points.
class WAtoms
Syntax	cpautN 40025	Extend class notation with set of all projective automorphisms.
class PAut
Definition	df-lhyp 40026*	Define the set of lattice hyperplanes, which are all lattice elements covered by 1 (i.e., all co-atoms). We call them "hyperplanes" instead of "co-atoms" in analogy with projective geometry hyperplanes. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.)
⊢ LHyp = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘) ∣ 𝑥( ⋖ ‘𝑘)(1.‘𝑘)})
Definition	df-laut 40027*	Define set of lattice autoisomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.)
⊢ LAut = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:(Base‘𝑘)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥)(le‘𝑘)(𝑓‘𝑦)))})
Definition	df-watsN 40028*	Define W-atoms corresponding to an arbitrary "fiducial (i.e. reference) atom" 𝑑. These are all atoms not in the polarity of {𝑑}), which is the hyperplane determined by 𝑑. Definition of set W in [Crawley] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.)
⊢ WAtoms = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘) ↦ ((Atoms‘𝑘) ∖ ((⊥𝑃‘𝑘)‘{𝑑}))))
Definition	df-pautN 40029*	Define set of all projective automorphisms. This is the intended definition of automorphism in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.)
⊢ PAut = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:(PSubSp‘𝑘)–1-1-onto→(PSubSp‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (PSubSp‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (PSubSp‘𝑘)(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝑓‘𝑦)))})
Theorem	watfvalN 40030*	The W atoms function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑊 = (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐴 ∖ ((⊥𝑃‘𝐾)‘{𝑑}))))
Theorem	watvalN 40031	Value of the W atoms function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑊‘𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ ((⊥𝑃‘𝐾)‘{𝐷})))
Theorem	iswatN 40032	The predicate "is a W atom" (corresponding to fiducial atom 𝐷). (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∈ ((⊥𝑃‘𝐾)‘{𝐷}))))
Theorem	lhpset 40033*	The set of co-atoms (lattice hyperplanes). (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐻 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑤𝐶 1 })
Theorem	islhp 40034	The predicate "is a co-atom (lattice hyperplane)". (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊𝐶 1 )))
Theorem	islhp2 40035	The predicate "is a co-atom (lattice hyperplane)". (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ 𝑊𝐶 1 ))
Theorem	lhpbase 40036	A co-atom is a member of the lattice base set (i.e., a lattice element). (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	lhp1cvr 40037	The lattice unity covers a co-atom (lattice hyperplane). (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.)
⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝑊𝐶 1 )
Theorem	lhplt 40038	An atom under a co-atom is strictly less than it. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝑃 < 𝑊)
Theorem	lhp2lt 40039	The join of two atoms under a co-atom is strictly less than it. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) < 𝑊)
Theorem	lhpexlt 40040*	There exists an atom less than a co-atom. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑊)
Theorem	lhp0lt 40041	A co-atom is greater than zero. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 0 < 𝑊)
Theorem	lhpn0 40042	A co-atom is nonzero. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝑊 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	lhpexle 40043*	There exists an atom under a co-atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	lhpexnle 40044*	There exists an atom not under a co-atom. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	lhpexle1lem 40045*	Lemma for lhpexle1 40046 and others that eliminates restrictions on 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpexle1 40046*	There exists an atom under a co-atom different from any given element. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpexle2lem 40047*	Lemma for lhpexle2 40048. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑌))
Theorem	lhpexle2 40048*	There exists atom under a co-atom different from any two other elements. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑌))
Theorem	lhpexle3lem 40049*	There exists atom under a co-atom different from any three other atoms. TODO: study if adant*, simp* usage can be improved. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑍)))
Theorem	lhpexle3 40050*	There exists atom under a co-atom different from any three other elements. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑍)))
Theorem	lhpex2leN 40051*	There exist at least two different atoms under a co-atom. This allows to create a line under the co-atom. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞))
Theorem	lhpoc 40052	The orthocomplement of a co-atom (lattice hyperplane) is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	lhpoc2N 40053	The orthocomplement of an atom is a co-atom (lattice hyperplane). (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝐻))
Theorem	lhpocnle 40054	The orthocomplement of a co-atom is not under it. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ¬ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	lhpocat 40055	The orthocomplement of a co-atom is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lhpocnel 40056	The orthocomplement of a co-atom is an atom not under it. Provides a convenient construction when we need the existence of any object with this property. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ( ⊥ ‘𝑊) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	lhpocnel2 40057	The orthocomplement of a co-atom is an atom not under it. Provides a convenient construction when we need the existence of any object with this property. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	lhpjat1 40058	The join of a co-atom (hyperplane) and an atom not under it is the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑊 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 )
Theorem	lhpjat2 40059	The join of a co-atom (hyperplane) and an atom not under it is the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑊) = 1 )
Theorem	lhpj1 40060	The join of a co-atom (hyperplane) and an element not under it is the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑊 ∨ 𝑋) = 1 )
Theorem	lhpmcvr 40061	The meet of a lattice hyperplane with an element not under it is covered by the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	lhpmcvr2 40062*	Alternate way to express that the meet of a lattice hyperplane with an element not under it is covered by the element. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpmcvr3 40063	Specialization of lhpmcvr2 40062. TODO: Use this to simplify many uses of (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 to become 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpmcvr4N 40064	Specialization of lhpmcvr2 40062. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌)
Theorem	lhpmcvr5N 40065*	Specialization of lhpmcvr2 40062. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpmcvr6N 40066*	Specialization of lhpmcvr2 40062. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	lhpm0atN 40067	If the meet of a lattice hyperplane with a nonzero element is zero, the element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊) = 0 )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lhpmat 40068	An element covered by the lattice unity, when conjoined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∧ 𝑊) = 0 )
Theorem	lhpmatb 40069	An element covered by the lattice unity, when conjoined with an atom, equals zero iff the atom is not under it. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑊) = 0 ))
Theorem	lhp2at0 40070	Join and meet with different atoms under co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑉 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑉) = 0 )
Theorem	lhp2atnle 40071	Inequality for 2 different atoms under co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑉 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ 𝑉 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	lhp2atne 40072	Inequality for joins with 2 different atoms under co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑉 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	lhp2at0nle 40073	Inequality for 2 different atoms (or an atom and zero) under co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = 0 ) ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑉 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ 𝑉 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	lhp2at0ne 40074	Inequality for joins with 2 different atoms (or an atom and zero) under co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = 0 ) ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑉 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	lhpelim 40075	Eliminate an atom not under a lattice hyperplane. TODO: Look at proofs using lhpmat 40068 to see if this can be used to shorten them. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑊) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	lhpmod2i2 40076	Modular law for hyperplanes analogous to atmod2i2 39900 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑊) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑊 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	lhpmod6i1 40077	Modular law for hyperplanes analogous to complement of atmod2i1 39899 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	lhprelat3N 40078*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic with respect to co-atoms (lattice hyperplanes). Dual version of hlrelat3 39450. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 (𝑋 ≤ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑤)𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cdlemb2 40079*	Given two atoms not under the fiducial (reference) co-atom 𝑊, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	lhple 40080	Property of a lattice element under a co-atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑋)
Theorem	lhpat 40081	Create an atom under a co-atom. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lhpat4N 40082	Property of an atom under a co-atom. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈)
Theorem	lhpat2 40083	Create an atom under a co-atom. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lhpat3 40084	There is only one atom under both 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 and co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑅))
Theorem	4atexlemk 40085	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ HL)
Theorem	4atexlemw 40086	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	4atexlempw 40087	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	4atexlemp 40088	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	4atexlemq 40089	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	4atexlems 40090	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	4atexlemt 40091	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	4atexlemutvt 40092	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))
Theorem	4atexlempnq 40093	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	4atexlemnslpq 40094	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	4atexlemkl 40095	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	4atexlemkc 40096	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CvLat)
Theorem	4atexlemwb 40097	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
Theorem	4atexlempsb 40098	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
Theorem	4atexlemqtb 40099	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∈ (Base‘𝐾))
Theorem	4atexlempns 40100	Lemma for 4atexlem7 40113. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑇) = (𝑉 ∨ 𝑇))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑆)