P. 401 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40001-40100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cdlemefrs32fva1 40001*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑅 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝜑))) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝜓) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefr29exN 40002*	Lemma for cdlemefs29bpre1N 40017. (Compare cdleme25a 39953.) TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: IS THIS NEEDED? (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	cdlemefr27cl 40003	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefr32sn2aw 40004*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemefr32snb 40005*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefr29bpre0N 40006*	TODO fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ 𝑧 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁))
Theorem	cdlemefr29clN 40007*	Show closure of the unique element in cdleme29c 39976. TODO fix comment. TODO Not needed? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme43frv1snN 40008*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑋)
Theorem	cdlemefr32fvaN 40009*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefr32fva1 40010*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefr31fv1 40011*	Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 38558 3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	cdlemefs29pre00N 40012	FIX COMMENT. TODO: see if this is the optimal utility theorem using lhpmat 39630. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) → (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) ↔ (¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅)))
Theorem	cdlemefs27cl 40013*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of 𝑁. TODO FIX COMMENT This is the start of a re-proof of cdleme27cl 39966 etc. with the 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) condition (so as to not have the 𝐶 hypothesis). (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑢 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefs32sn1aw 40014*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemefs32snb 40015*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefs29bpre0N 40016*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ 𝑧 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁))
Theorem	cdlemefs29bpre1N 40017*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29cpre1N 40018*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29clN 40019*	Show closure of the unique element in cdleme29c 39976. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1snlem 40020*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1sn 40021*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fvaN 40022*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: consolidate uses of lhpmat 39630 here and elsewhere, and presence/absence of 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) term. Also, why can proof be shortened with cdleme27cl 39966? What is difference from cdlemefs27cl 40013? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fva1 40023*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs31fv1 40024*	Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 38558 3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT. ***END OF VALUE AT ATOM STUFF TO REPLACE ONES BELOW*** "cdleme3xsn1aw" decreased using "cdlemefs32sn1aw" "cdleme32sn1aw" decreased from 3302 to 36 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32sn2aw" decreased from 1687 to 26 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 376 to 375 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 375 to 368 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme35sn3a" decreased from 547 to 523 using "cdleme43frv1sn". (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefr44 40025*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefr45 instead? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefs44 40026*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefs45 40029 instead TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefr45 40027*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefr45e 40028*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefr45 40027. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefr45 40027 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45 40029*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefs45ee 40030*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 40029. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 40029 uses? Should ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) be assigned to a hypothesis letter? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45eN 40031*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 40029. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 40029 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme32sn1awN 40032*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3a 40033*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme32sn2awN 40034*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snaw 40035*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snb 40036*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32fva 40037*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fva1 40038*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fvaw 40039*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32fvcl 40040*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32a 40041*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32b 40042*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑌) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32c 40043*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32d 40044*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32e 40045*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32f 40046*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32le 40047*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme35a 40048	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	cdleme35fnpq 40049	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ 𝐹 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme35b 40050	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))
Theorem	cdleme35c 40051	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) = (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme35d 40052	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme35e 40053	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	cdleme35f 40054	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35g 40055	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊))) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35h 40056	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme35h2 40057	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme35sn2aw 40058*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line case; compare cdleme32sn2awN 40034. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme35sn3a 40059*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme36a 40060	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑡 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme36m 40061	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐶) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme37m 40062	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐶 = 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme38m 40063	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme38n 40064	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO shorter if proved directly from cdleme36m 40061 and cdleme37m 40062? (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme39a 40065	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 40064 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 40032. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐺 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme39n 40066	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 40064 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 40032. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme40m 40067*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT Use proof idea from cdleme32sn1awN 40032. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cdleme40n 40068*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO get rid of '.<' class? (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40v 40069*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Change bound variables in ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 (but we use ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 for convenience since we have its hypotheses available). (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40w 40070*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Apply cdleme40v 40069 bound variable change to ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme42a 40071	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42c 40072	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdleme42d 40073	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3aw 40074*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is different on and off the 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41sn4aw 40075*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for on and off 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41snaw 40076*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for combined cases; compare cdleme32snaw 40035. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41fva11 40077*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is one-to-one for r in W (r an atom not under w). TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑆))
Theorem	cdleme42b 40078*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42e 40079*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42f 40080*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42g 40081*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42h 40082*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42i 40083*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42k 40084*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Since F ' S =/= F'R when S =/= R (i.e. 1-1); then ( ( F ' R ) .\/ ( F ' S ) ) is 2-dim therefore = ( ( F ' R ) .\/ V ) by cdleme42i 40083 and ps-1 39077 TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42ke 40085*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42keg 40086*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42ke 40085 and even combine with it? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42mN 40087*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme42mgN 40088*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42mN 40087? Combine with cdleme42mN 40087? (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme43aN 40089	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 penultimate line: g(f(r)) = (p v q) ^ (g(s) v v1). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ 𝑉)))
Theorem	cdleme43bN 40090	Lemma for Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. g(s) is an atom not under w. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme43cN 40091	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 last line: r v g(s) = r v v2. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme43dN 40092	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 116 2nd line: f(r) v s = f(r) v f(g(s)). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑍 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g2 40093	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. TODO What other conversion theorems would be reused? e.g. cdlemeg46nlpq 40117? Find other hlatjcom 38967 uses giving 𝑄 ∨ 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g1 40094	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))))
Theorem	cdleme17d2 40095*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. 𝐹, 𝐺 represent f(s), fs(p) respectively. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d3 40096*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d4 40097*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d 40098*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme48fv 40099*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 40041? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme48fvg 40100*	Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition in cdleme48fv 40099. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 40041? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Can this be proved more directly by eliminating 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 in earlier theorems? Should this replace uses of cdleme48fv 40099? (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))