P. 49 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 4801-4900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	preq2b 4801	Biconditional equality lemma for unordered pairs, deduction form. Two unordered pairs have the same first element iff the second elements are equal. (Contributed by AV, 18-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	preqr1 4802	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same second element, the first elements are equal. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	preqr2 4803	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same first element, the second elements are equal. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	preq12b 4804	Equality relationship for two unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	opthpr 4805	An unordered pair has the ordered pair property (compare opth 5444) under certain conditions. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	preqr1g 4806	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same second element, the first elements are equal. Closed form of preqr1 4802. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	preq12bg 4807	Closed form of preq12b 4804. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
Theorem	prneimg 4808	Two pairs are not equal if at least one element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ∨ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷}))
Theorem	prneimg2 4809	Two pairs are not equal if their counterparts are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))))
Theorem	prnebg 4810	A (proper) pair is not equal to another (maybe improper) pair if and only if an element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ∨ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷}))
Theorem	pr1eqbg 4811	A (proper) pair is equal to another (maybe improper) pair containing one element of the first pair if and only if the other element of the first pair is contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐶}))
Theorem	pr1nebg 4812	A (proper) pair is not equal to another (maybe improper) pair containing one element of the first pair if and only if the other element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐵, 𝐶}))
Theorem	preqsnd 4813	Equivalence for a pair equal to a singleton, deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2016.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2022.) (Revised by AV, 16-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	prnesn 4814	A proper unordered pair is not a (proper or improper) singleton. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶})
Theorem	prneprprc 4815	A proper unordered pair is not an improper unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ V) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	preqsn 4816	Equivalence for a pair equal to a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	preq12nebg 4817	Equality relationship for two proper unordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
Theorem	prel12g 4818	Equality of two unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.) (Revised by AV, 9-Dec-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷} ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷})))
Theorem	opthprneg 4819	An unordered pair has the ordered pair property (compare opth 5444) under certain conditions. Variant of opthpr 4805 in closed form. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	elpreqprlem 4820*	Lemma for elpreqpr 4821. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝑥})
Theorem	elpreqpr 4821*	Equality and membership rule for pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝑥})
Theorem	elpreqprb 4822*	A set is an element of an unordered pair iff there is another (maybe the same) set which is an element of the unordered pair. (Proposed by BJ, 8-Dec-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 9-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝑥}))
Theorem	elpr2elpr 4823*	For an element 𝐴 of an unordered pair which is a subset of a given set 𝑉, there is another (maybe the same) element 𝑏 of the given set 𝑉 being an element of the unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 {𝑋, 𝑌} = {𝐴, 𝑏})
Theorem	ralunsn 4824*	Restricted quantification over the union of a set and a singleton, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	2ralunsn 4825*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and a singleton, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ∧ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	pwsn 4826	The power set of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2006.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴} = {∅, {𝐴}}
Theorem	pwpr 4827	The power set of an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2009.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({∅, {𝐴}} ∪ {{𝐵}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
Theorem	pwtp 4828	The power set of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = (({∅, {𝐴}} ∪ {{𝐵}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}) ∪ ({{𝐶}, {𝐴, 𝐶}} ∪ {{𝐵, 𝐶}, {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}}))
Theorem	pw0 4829	Compute the power set of the empty set. Theorem 89 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝒫 ∅ = {∅}
Theorem	pwpw0 4830	Compute the power set of the power set of the empty set. (See pw0 4829 for the power set of the empty set.) Theorem 90 of [Suppes] p. 48. Although this theorem is a special case of pwsn 4826, we have chosen to show a direct elementary proof. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) Avoid pwsn 4826. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 {∅} = {∅, {∅}}
Theorem	pwpwpw0 4831	Compute the power set of the power set of the power set of the empty set. (See also pw0 4829 and pwpw0 4830.) (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2009.)
⊢ 𝒫 {∅, {∅}} = ({∅, {∅}} ∪ {{{∅}}, {∅, {∅}}})
Theorem	prproe 4832*	For an element of a proper unordered pair of elements of a class 𝑉, there is another (different) element of the class 𝑉 which is an element of the proper pair. (Contributed by AV, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝐶})𝑣 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	3elpr2eq 4833	If there are three elements in a proper unordered pair, and two of them are different from the third one, the two must be equal. (Contributed by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝑍 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋)) → 𝑌 = 𝑍)
2.1.18  Ordered pairs and triples
2.1.18.1  Ordered pairs
Syntax	cop 4834	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Definition	df-op 4835*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 4854, opprc2 4855, and 0nelop 5467). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 4838. For the justifying theorem (for sets) see opth 5444. See dfopif 4836 for an equivalent formulation using the if operation. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 4835 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 4835 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}, justified by opthwiener 5486. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} is justified by opthreg 9622, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. A definition that also works for proper classes is ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩4 = ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∪ (𝐵 × {{∅}})), justified by opthprc 5714. Nearly at the same time as Norbert Wiener, Felix Hausdorff proposed the following definition in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), p. 32, in 1914: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩5 = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5318). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary (at least not in full extent), see opthhausdorff0 5490 and opthhausdorff 5489. If we restrict our sets to nonnegative integers, an ordered pair definition that involves only elementary arithmetic is provided by nn0opthi 14417. An ordered pair of real numbers can also be represented by a complex number as shown by cru 12315. Kuratowski's ordered pair definition is standard for ZFC set theory, but it is very inconvenient to use in New Foundations theory because it is not type-level; a common alternate definition in New Foundations is the definition from [Rosser] p. 281. Since there are other ways to define ordered pairs, we discourage direct use of this definition so that most theorems won't depend on this particular construction; theorems will instead rely on dfopif 4836. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})}
Theorem	dfopif 4836	Rewrite df-op 4835 using if. When both arguments are sets, it reduces to the standard Kuratowski definition; otherwise, it is defined to be the empty set. Avoid directly depending on this detail so that theorems will not depend on the Kuratowski construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = if((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V), {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, ∅)
Theorem	dfopg 4837	Value of the ordered pair when the arguments are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
Theorem	dfop 4838	Value of an ordered pair when the arguments are sets, with the conclusion corresponding to Kuratowski's original definition. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}
Theorem	opeq1 4839	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	opeq2 4840	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	opeq12 4841	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	opeq1i 4842	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	opeq2i 4843	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩
Theorem	opeq12i 4844	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩
Theorem	opeq1d 4845	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	opeq2d 4846	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	opeq12d 4847	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	nfop 4848	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Theorem	nfopd 4849	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4848. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4848 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	csbopg 4850	Distribution of class substitution over ordered pairs. (Contributed by Drahflow, 25-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Oct-2015.) (Revised by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷⟩)
Theorem	opidg 4851	The ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ in Kuratowski's representation. Closed form of opid 4852. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = {{𝐴}})
Theorem	opid 4852	The ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ in Kuratowski's representation. Inference form of opidg 4851. (Contributed by FL, 28-Dec-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Feb-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = {{𝐴}}
Theorem	opprc 4853	Expansion of an ordered pair when either member is a proper class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	opprc1 4854	Expansion of an ordered pair when the first member is a proper class. See also opprc 4853. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	opprc2 4855	Expansion of an ordered pair when the second member is a proper class. See also opprc 4853. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ V → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	oprcl 4856	If an ordered pair has an element, then its arguments are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
2.1.18.2  Ordered triples
Syntax	cotp 4857	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Definition	df-ot 4858	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	oteq1 4859	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq2 4860	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq3 4861	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	oteq1d 4862	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq2d 4863	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq3d 4864	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	oteq123d 4865	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹⟩)
2.1.19  The union of a class
Syntax	cuni 4866	Extend class notation to include the union of a class. Read: "union (of) 𝐴".
class ∪ 𝐴
Definition	df-uni 4867*	Define the union of a class i.e. the collection of all members of the members of the class. Definition 5.5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ∪ {{1, 3}, {1, 8}} = {1, 3, 8} (ex-uni 31032). This is similar to the union of two classes df-un 4151. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)}
Theorem	dfuni2 4868*	Alternate definition of class union. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
Theorem	eluni 4869*	Membership in class union. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eluni2 4870*	Membership in class union. Restricted quantifier version. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	elunii 4871	Membership in class union. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐶)
Theorem	nfunid 4872	Deduction version of nfuni 4873. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfuni 4873	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for union. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴
Theorem	uniss 4874	Subclass relationship for class union. Theorem 61 of [Suppes] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unissi 4875	Subclass relationship for subclass union. Inference form of uniss 4874. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵
Theorem	unissd 4876	Subclass relationship for subclass union. Deduction form of uniss 4874. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unieq 4877	Equality theorem for class union. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unieqi 4878	Inference of equality of two class unions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵
Theorem	unieqd 4879	Deduction of equality of two class unions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	eluniab 4880*	Membership in union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	elunirab 4881*	Membership in union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	uniprg 4882	The union of a pair is the union of its members. Proposition 5.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2006.) Avoid using unipr 4883 to prove it from uniprg 4882. (Revised by BJ, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ {𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	unipr 4883	The union of a pair is the union of its members. Proposition 5.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unisng 4884	A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	unisn 4885	A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	unisnv 4886	A set equals the union of its singleton (setvar case). (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑥} = 𝑥
Theorem	unisn3 4887*	Union of a singleton in the form of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	dfnfc2 4888*	An alternative statement of the effective freeness of a class 𝐴, when it is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴))
Theorem	uniun 4889	The class union of the union of two classes. Theorem 8.3 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (∪ 𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	uniin 4890	The class union of the intersection of two classes. Exercise 4.12(n) of [Mendelson] p. 235. See uniinqs 8821 for a condition where equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	uniinOLD 4891	Obsolete version of uniin 4890 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssuni 4892	Subclass relationship for class union. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐶)
Theorem	uni0b 4893	The union of a set is empty iff the set is included in the singleton of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ {∅})
Theorem	uni0c 4894*	The union of a set is empty iff all of its members are empty. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∅)
Theorem	uni0 4895	The union of the empty set is the empty set. Theorem 8.7 of [Quine] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) Remove use of ax-nul 5259. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.) Avoid ax-11 2193. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
Theorem	uni0OLD 4896	Obsolete version of uni0 4895 as of 1-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) Remove use of ax-nul 5259. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
Theorem	csbuni 4897	Distribute proper substitution through the union of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	elssuni 4898	An element of a class is a subclass of its union. Theorem 8.6 of [Quine] p. 54. Also the basis for Proposition 7.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unissel 4899	Condition turning a subclass relationship for union into an equality. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2006.)
⊢ ((∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	unissb 4900*	Relationship involving membership, subset, and union. Exercise 5 of [Enderton] p. 26 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) Avoid ax-11 2193. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 28-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)