P. 49 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 4801-4900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sneqbg 4801	Two singletons of sets are equal iff their elements are equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝐴} = {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	snsspw 4802	The singleton of a class is a subset of its power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴} ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	prsspw 4803	An unordered pair belongs to the power class of a class iff each member belongs to the class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝒫 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	preq1b 4804	Biconditional equality lemma for unordered pairs, deduction form. Two unordered pairs have the same second element iff the first elements are equal. (Contributed by AV, 18-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	preq2b 4805	Biconditional equality lemma for unordered pairs, deduction form. Two unordered pairs have the same first element iff the second elements are equal. (Contributed by AV, 18-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	preqr1 4806	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same second element, the first elements are equal. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	preqr2 4807	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same first element, the second elements are equal. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	preq12b 4808	Equality relationship for two unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	opthpr 4809	An unordered pair has the ordered pair property (compare opth 5449) under certain conditions. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	preqr1g 4810	Reverse equality lemma for unordered pairs. If two unordered pairs have the same second element, the first elements are equal. Closed form of preqr1 4806. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶} → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	preq12bg 4811	Closed form of preq12b 4808. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
Theorem	prneimg 4812	Two pairs are not equal if at least one element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ∨ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷}))
Theorem	prneimg2 4813	Two pairs are not equal if their counterparts are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))))
Theorem	prnebg 4814	A (proper) pair is not equal to another (maybe improper) pair if and only if an element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ∨ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷}))
Theorem	pr1eqbg 4815	A (proper) pair is equal to another (maybe improper) pair containing one element of the first pair if and only if the other element of the first pair is contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐶}))
Theorem	pr1nebg 4816	A (proper) pair is not equal to another (maybe improper) pair containing one element of the first pair if and only if the other element of the first pair is not contained in the second pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐵, 𝐶}))
Theorem	preqsnd 4817	Equivalence for a pair equal to a singleton, deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2016.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2022.) (Revised by AV, 16-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	prnesn 4818	A proper unordered pair is not a (proper or improper) singleton. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶})
Theorem	prneprprc 4819	A proper unordered pair is not an improper unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ V) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≠ {𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	preqsn 4820	Equivalence for a pair equal to a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	preq12nebg 4821	Equality relationship for two proper unordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
Theorem	prel12g 4822	Equality of two unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.) (Revised by AV, 9-Dec-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷} ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷})))
Theorem	opthprneg 4823	An unordered pair has the ordered pair property (compare opth 5449) under certain conditions. Variant of opthpr 4809 in closed form. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	elpreqprlem 4824*	Lemma for elpreqpr 4825. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝑥})
Theorem	elpreqpr 4825*	Equality and membership rule for pairs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝑥})
Theorem	elpreqprb 4826*	A set is an element of an unordered pair iff there is another (maybe the same) set which is an element of the unordered pair. (Proposed by BJ, 8-Dec-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 9-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ ∃𝑥{𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝑥}))
Theorem	elpr2elpr 4827*	For an element 𝐴 of an unordered pair which is a subset of a given set 𝑉, there is another (maybe the same) element 𝑏 of the given set 𝑉 being an element of the unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 {𝑋, 𝑌} = {𝐴, 𝑏})
Theorem	ralunsn 4828*	Restricted quantification over the union of a set and a singleton, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	2ralunsn 4829*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and a singleton, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ∧ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	pwsn 4830	The power set of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2006.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴} = {∅, {𝐴}}
Theorem	pwpr 4831	The power set of an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2009.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({∅, {𝐴}} ∪ {{𝐵}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
Theorem	pwtp 4832	The power set of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝒫 {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = (({∅, {𝐴}} ∪ {{𝐵}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}) ∪ ({{𝐶}, {𝐴, 𝐶}} ∪ {{𝐵, 𝐶}, {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}}))
Theorem	pw0 4833	Compute the power set of the empty set. Theorem 89 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝒫 ∅ = {∅}
Theorem	pwpw0 4834	Compute the power set of the power set of the empty set. (See pw0 4833 for the power set of the empty set.) Theorem 90 of [Suppes] p. 48. Although this theorem is a special case of pwsn 4830, we have chosen to show a direct elementary proof. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) Avoid pwsn 4830. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 {∅} = {∅, {∅}}
Theorem	pwpwpw0 4835	Compute the power set of the power set of the power set of the empty set. (See also pw0 4833 and pwpw0 4834.) (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2009.)
⊢ 𝒫 {∅, {∅}} = ({∅, {∅}} ∪ {{{∅}}, {∅, {∅}}})
Theorem	prproe 4836*	For an element of a proper unordered pair of elements of a class 𝑉, there is another (different) element of the class 𝑉 which is an element of the proper pair. (Contributed by AV, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝐶})𝑣 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	3elpr2eq 4837	If there are three elements in a proper unordered pair, and two of them are different from the third one, the two must be equal. (Contributed by AV, 19-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝑍 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋)) → 𝑌 = 𝑍)
2.1.18  Ordered pairs and triples
2.1.18.1  Ordered pairs
Syntax	cop 4838	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Definition	df-op 4839*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 4858, opprc2 4859, and 0nelop 5472). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 4842. For the justifying theorem (for sets) see opth 5449. See dfopif 4840 for an equivalent formulation using the if operation. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 4839 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 4839 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}, justified by opthwiener 5491. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} is justified by opthreg 9646, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. A definition that also works for proper classes is ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩4 = ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∪ (𝐵 × {{∅}})), justified by opthprc 5719. Nearly at the same time as Norbert Wiener, Felix Hausdorff proposed the following definition in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), p. 32, in 1914: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩5 = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5323). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary (at least not in full extent), see opthhausdorff0 5495 and opthhausdorff 5494. If we restrict our sets to nonnegative integers, an ordered pair definition that involves only elementary arithmetic is provided by nn0opthi 14441. An ordered pair of real numbers can also be represented by a complex number as shown by cru 12339. Kuratowski's ordered pair definition is standard for ZFC set theory, but it is very inconvenient to use in New Foundations theory because it is not type-level; a common alternate definition in New Foundations is the definition from [Rosser] p. 281. Since there are other ways to define ordered pairs, we discourage direct use of this definition so that most theorems won't depend on this particular construction; theorems will instead rely on dfopif 4840. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})}
Theorem	dfopif 4840	Rewrite df-op 4839 using if. When both arguments are sets, it reduces to the standard Kuratowski definition; otherwise, it is defined to be the empty set. Avoid directly depending on this detail so that theorems will not depend on the Kuratowski construction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = if((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V), {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, ∅)
Theorem	dfopg 4841	Value of the ordered pair when the arguments are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
Theorem	dfop 4842	Value of an ordered pair when the arguments are sets, with the conclusion corresponding to Kuratowski's original definition. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}
Theorem	opeq1 4843	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	opeq2 4844	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	opeq12 4845	Equality theorem for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	opeq1i 4846	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	opeq2i 4847	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩
Theorem	opeq12i 4848	Equality inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩
Theorem	opeq1d 4849	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	opeq2d 4850	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	opeq12d 4851	Equality deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	nfop 4852	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Theorem	nfopd 4853	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4852. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4852 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	csbopg 4854	Distribution of class substitution over ordered pairs. (Contributed by Drahflow, 25-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Oct-2015.) (Revised by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷⟩)
Theorem	opidg 4855	The ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ in Kuratowski's representation. Closed form of opid 4856. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = {{𝐴}})
Theorem	opid 4856	The ordered pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ in Kuratowski's representation. Inference form of opidg 4855. (Contributed by FL, 28-Dec-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Feb-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = {{𝐴}}
Theorem	opprc 4857	Expansion of an ordered pair when either member is a proper class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	opprc1 4858	Expansion of an ordered pair when the first member is a proper class. See also opprc 4857. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	opprc2 4859	Expansion of an ordered pair when the second member is a proper class. See also opprc 4857. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ V → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅)
Theorem	oprcl 4860	If an ordered pair has an element, then its arguments are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
2.1.18.2  Ordered triples
Syntax	cotp 4861	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Definition	df-ot 4862	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	oteq1 4863	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq2 4864	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq3 4865	Equality theorem for ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	oteq1d 4866	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq2d 4867	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	oteq3d 4868	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	oteq123d 4869	Equality deduction for ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹⟩)
2.1.19  The union of a class
Syntax	cuni 4870	Extend class notation to include the union of a class. Read: "union (of) 𝐴".
class ∪ 𝐴
Definition	df-uni 4871*	Define the union of a class i.e. the collection of all members of the members of the class. Definition 5.5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ∪ {{1, 3}, {1, 8}} = {1, 3, 8} (ex-uni 31057). This is similar to the union of two classes df-un 4154. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)}
Theorem	dfuni2 4872*	Alternate definition of class union. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
Theorem	eluni 4873*	Membership in class union. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	eluni2 4874*	Membership in class union. Restricted quantifier version. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	elunii 4875	Membership in class union. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐶)
Theorem	nfunid 4876	Deduction version of nfuni 4877. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	nfuni 4877	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for union. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴
Theorem	uniss 4878	Subclass relationship for class union. Theorem 61 of [Suppes] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unissi 4879	Subclass relationship for subclass union. Inference form of uniss 4878. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵
Theorem	unissd 4880	Subclass relationship for subclass union. Deduction form of uniss 4878. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unieq 4881	Equality theorem for class union. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unieqi 4882	Inference of equality of two class unions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵
Theorem	unieqd 4883	Deduction of equality of two class unions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	eluniab 4884*	Membership in union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	elunirab 4885*	Membership in union of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	uniprg 4886	The union of a pair is the union of its members. Proposition 5.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2006.) Avoid using unipr 4887 to prove it from uniprg 4886. (Revised by BJ, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ {𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	unipr 4887	The union of a pair is the union of its members. Proposition 5.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴, 𝐵} = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unisng 4888	A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	unisn 4889	A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴
Theorem	unisnv 4890	A set equals the union of its singleton (setvar case). (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑥} = 𝑥
Theorem	unisn3 4891*	Union of a singleton in the form of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	dfnfc2 4892*	An alternative statement of the effective freeness of a class 𝐴, when it is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴))
Theorem	uniun 4893	The class union of the union of two classes. Theorem 8.3 of [Quine] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (∪ 𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	uniin 4894	The class union of the intersection of two classes. Exercise 4.12(n) of [Mendelson] p. 235. See uniinqs 8846 for a condition where equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	uniinOLD 4895	Obsolete version of uniin 4894 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssuni 4896	Subclass relationship for class union. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐶)
Theorem	uni0b 4897	The union of a set is empty iff the set is included in the singleton of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ {∅})
Theorem	uni0c 4898*	The union of a set is empty iff all of its members are empty. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∅)
Theorem	uni0 4899	The union of the empty set is the empty set. Theorem 8.7 of [Quine] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) Remove use of ax-nul 5263. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.) Avoid ax-11 2197. (Revised by TM, 1-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅
Theorem	uni0OLD 4900	Obsolete version of uni0 4899 as of 1-Feb-2026. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.) Remove use of ax-nul 5263. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 4-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ ∅ = ∅