P. 271 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27001-27100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
14.3.14  Zeta function
Syntax	czeta 27001	The Riemann zeta function.
class ζ
Definition	df-zeta 27002*	Define the Riemann zeta function. This definition uses a series expansion of the alternating zeta function ~? zetaalt that is convergent everywhere except 1, but going from the alternating zeta function to the regular zeta function requires dividing by 1 − 2↑(1 − 𝑠), which has zeroes other than 1. To extract the correct value of the zeta function at these points, we extend the divided alternating zeta function by continuity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ζ = (℩𝑓 ∈ ((ℂ ∖ {1})–cn→ℂ)∀𝑠 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {1})((1 − (2↑𝑐(1 − 𝑠))) · (𝑓‘𝑠)) = Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑛)(((-1↑𝑘) · (𝑛C𝑘)) · ((𝑘 + 1)↑𝑐𝑠)) / (2↑(𝑛 + 1))))
Theorem	zetacvg 27003*	The zeta series is convergent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (ℜ‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝑘↑𝑐-𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
14.3.15  Gamma function
Syntax	clgam 27004	Logarithm of the Gamma function.
class log Γ
Syntax	cgam 27005	The Gamma function.
class Γ
Syntax	cigam 27006	The inverse Gamma function.
class 1/Γ
Definition	df-lgam 27007*	Define the log-Gamma function. We can work with this form of the gamma function a bit easier than the equivalent expression for the gamma function itself, and moreover this function is not actually equal to log(Γ(𝑥)) because the branch cuts are placed differently (we do have exp(log Γ(𝑥)) = Γ(𝑥), though). This definition is attributed to Euler, and unlike the usual integral definition is defined on the entire complex plane except the nonpositive integers ℤ ∖ ℕ, where the function has simple poles. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ log Γ = (𝑧 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))) − (log‘𝑧)))
Definition	df-gam 27008	Define the Gamma function. See df-lgam 27007 for more information about the reason for this definition in terms of the log-gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Γ = (exp ∘ log Γ)
Definition	df-igam 27009	Define the inverse Gamma function, which is defined everywhere, unlike the Gamma function itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝑥))))
Theorem	eldmgm 27010	Elementhood in the set of non-nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -𝐴 ∈ ℕ0))
Theorem	dmgmaddn0 27011	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is nonzero for any nonnegative integer 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmlogdmgm 27012	If 𝐴 is in the continuous domain of the logarithm, then it is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0)) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	rpdmgm 27013	A positive real number is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmn0 27014	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmgmaddnn0 27015	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer and 𝑁 is a nonnegative integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is also not a nonpositive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmdivn0 27016	Lemma for lgamf 27030. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝑀) + 1) ≠ 0)
Theorem	lgamgulmlem1 27017*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem2 27018*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((1 / (𝑁 − 𝑅)) − (1 / 𝑁))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem3 27019*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑁 + 1) / 𝑁))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑁↑2))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem4 27020*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝑇) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	lgamgulmlem5 27021*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27023. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) → (abs‘((𝐺‘𝑛)‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑇‘𝑛))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem6 27022*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈) ∧ (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ 𝑂) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘𝑂) ≤ 𝑟)))
Theorem	lgamgulm 27023*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamgulm2 27024*	Rewrite the limit of the sequence 𝐺 in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (log Γ‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((log Γ‘𝑧) + (log‘𝑧)))))
Theorem	lgambdd 27025*	The log-Gamma function is bounded on the region 𝑈. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘(log Γ‘𝑧)) ≤ 𝑟)
Theorem	lgamucov 27026*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27023 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ ((int‘𝐽)‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamucov2 27027*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27023 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	lgamcvglem 27028*	Lemma for lgamf 27030 and lgamcvg 27042. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴))))
Theorem	lgamcl 27029	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	lgamf 27030	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ log Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamf 27031	The Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamcl 27032	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eflgam 27033	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (exp‘(log Γ‘𝐴)) = (Γ‘𝐴))
Theorem	gamne0 27034	The Gamma function is never zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ≠ 0)
Theorem	igamval 27035	Value of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = if(𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	igamz 27036	Value of the inverse Gamma function on nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	igamgam 27037	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamlgam 27038	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (exp‘-(log Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamf 27039	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ:ℂ⟶ℂ
Theorem	igamcl 27040	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	gamigam 27041	The Gamma function is the inverse of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (1/Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg 27042*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴) + log(𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg2 27043*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	gamcvg 27044*	The pointwise exponential of the series 𝐺 converges to Γ(𝐴) · 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	lgamp1 27045	The functional equation of the (log) Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	gamp1 27046	The functional equation of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	gamcvg2lem 27047*	Lemma for gamcvg2 27048. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) = seq1( · , 𝐹))
Theorem	gamcvg2 27048*	An infinite product expression for the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	regamcl 27049	The Gamma function is real for real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relgamcl 27050	The log-Gamma function is real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpgamcl 27051	The log-Gamma function is positive real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	lgam1 27052	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (log Γ‘1) = 0
Theorem	gam1 27053	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (Γ‘1) = 1
Theorem	facgam 27054	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝑁) = (Γ‘(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	gamfac 27055	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Γ‘𝑁) = (!‘(𝑁 − 1)))
14.4  Basic number theory
14.4.1  Wilson's theorem
Theorem	wilthlem1 27056	The only elements that are equal to their own inverses in the multiplicative group of nonzero elements in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ are 1 and -1≡𝑃 − 1. (Note that from prmdiveq 16754, (𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃 is the modular inverse of 𝑁 in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))) → (𝑁 = ((𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = (𝑃 − 1))))
Theorem	wilthlem2 27057*	Lemma for wilth 27059: induction step. The "hand proof" version of this theorem works by writing out the list of all numbers from 1 to 𝑃 − 1 in pairs such that a number is paired with its inverse. Every number has a unique inverse different from itself except 1 and 𝑃 − 1, and so each pair multiplies to 1, and 1 and 𝑃 − 1≡-1 multiply to -1, so the full product is equal to -1. Here we make this precise by doing the product pair by pair. The induction hypothesis says that every subset 𝑆 of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse (i.e. all pairs are matched up) and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃. Given such a set, we take out one element 𝑧 ≠ 𝑃 − 1. If there are no such elements, then 𝑆 = {𝑃 − 1} which forms the base case. Otherwise, 𝑆 ∖ {𝑧, 𝑧↑-1} is also closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1, so the induction hypothesis says that this equals -1; and the remaining two elements are either equal to each other, in which case wilthlem1 27056 gives that 𝑧 = 1 or 𝑃 − 1, and we've already excluded the second case, so the product gives 1; or 𝑧 ≠ 𝑧↑-1 and their product is 1. In either case the accumulated product is unaffected. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑠)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑆)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
Theorem	wilthlem3 27058*	Lemma for wilth 27059. Here we round out the argument of wilthlem2 27057 with the final step of the induction. The induction argument shows that every subset of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃, and clearly 1...(𝑃 − 1) itself is such a set. Thus, the product of all the elements is -1, and all that is left is to translate the group sum notation (which we used for its unordered summing capabilities) into an ordered sequence to match the definition of the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∥ ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) + 1))
Theorem	wilth 27059	Wilson's theorem. A number is prime iff it is greater than or equal to 2 and (𝑁 − 1)! is congruent to -1, mod 𝑁, or alternatively if 𝑁 divides (𝑁 − 1)! + 1. In this part of the proof we show the relatively simple reverse implication; see wilthlem3 27058 for the forward implication. This is Metamath 100 proof #51. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ ((!‘(𝑁 − 1)) + 1)))
Theorem	wilthimp 27060	The forward implication of Wilson's theorem wilth 27059 (see wilthlem3 27058), expressed using the modulo operation: For any prime 𝑝 we have (𝑝 − 1)!≡ − 1 (mod 𝑝), see theorem 5.24 in [ApostolNT] p. 116. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
14.4.2  The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Theorem	ftalem1 27061*	Lemma for fta 27068: "growth lemma". There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 is arbitrarily close in proportion to its dominant term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(abs‘(𝐴‘𝑘)) / 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑥) − ((𝐴‘𝑁) · (𝑥↑𝑁)))) < (𝐸 · ((abs‘𝑥)↑𝑁))))
Theorem	ftalem2 27062*	Lemma for fta 27068. There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 has magnitude greater than 𝐹(0) outside the closed ball B(0,r). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = if(if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1) ≤ 𝑇, 𝑇, if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / ((abs‘(𝐴‘𝑁)) / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))
Theorem	ftalem3 27063*	Lemma for fta 27068. There exists a global minimum of the function abs ∘ 𝐹. The proof uses a circle of radius 𝑟 where 𝑟 is the value coming from ftalem1 27061; since this is a compact set, the minimum on this disk is achieved, and this must then be the global minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑅}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑅 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	ftalem4 27064*	Lemma for fta 27068: Closure of the auxiliary variables for ftalem5 27065. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴‘𝐾) ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)))
Theorem	ftalem5 27065*	Lemma for fta 27068: Main proof. We have already shifted the minimum found in ftalem3 27063 to zero by a change of variables, and now we show that the minimum value is zero. Expanding in a series about the minimum value, let 𝐾 be the lowest term in the polynomial that is nonzero, and let 𝑇 be a 𝐾-th root of -𝐹(0) / 𝐴(𝐾). Then an evaluation of 𝐹(𝑇𝑋) where 𝑋 is a sufficiently small positive number yields 𝐹(0) for the first term and -𝐹(0) · 𝑋↑𝐾 for the 𝐾-th term, and all higher terms are bounded because 𝑋 is small. Thus, abs(𝐹(𝑇𝑋)) ≤ abs(𝐹(0))(1 − 𝑋↑𝐾) < abs(𝐹(0)), in contradiction to our choice of 𝐹(0) as the minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))
Theorem	ftalem6 27066*	Lemma for fta 27068: Discharge the auxiliary variables in ftalem5 27065. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))
Theorem	ftalem7 27067*	Lemma for fta 27068. Shift the minimum away from zero by a change of variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	fta 27068*	The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Any polynomial with positive degree (i.e. non-constant) has a root. This is Metamath 100 proof #2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆) ∧ (deg‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 0)
14.4.3  The Basel problem (ζ(2) = π2/6)
Theorem	basellem1 27069	Lemma for basel 27078. Closure of the sequence of roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) Replace OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → ((𝐾 · π) / 𝑁) ∈ (0(,)(π / 2)))
Theorem	basellem2 27070*	Lemma for basel 27078. Show that 𝑃 is a polynomial of degree 𝑀, and compute its coefficient function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → (𝑃 ∈ (Poly‘ℂ) ∧ (deg‘𝑃) = 𝑀 ∧ (coeff‘𝑃) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑁C(2 · 𝑛)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑛))))))
Theorem	basellem3 27071*	Lemma for basel 27078. Using the binomial theorem and de Moivre's formula, we have the identity e↑i𝑁𝑥 / (sin𝑥)↑𝑛 = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑁C𝑚)(i↑𝑚)(cot𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑚), so taking imaginary parts yields sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(𝑁C2𝑗)(-1)↑(𝑀 − 𝑗) (cot𝑥)↑(-2𝑗) = 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2), where 𝑁 = 2𝑀 + 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (0(,)(π / 2))) → (𝑃‘((tan‘𝐴)↑-2)) = ((sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) / ((sin‘𝐴)↑𝑁)))
Theorem	basellem4 27072*	Lemma for basel 27078. By basellem3 27071, the expression 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2) = sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 goes to zero whenever 𝑥 = 𝑛π / 𝑁 for some 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀), so this function enumerates 𝑀 distinct roots of a degree- 𝑀 polynomial, which must therefore be all the roots by fta1 26299. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → 𝑇:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→(◡𝑃 “ {0}))
Theorem	basellem5 27073*	Lemma for basel 27078. Using vieta1 26303, we can calculate the sum of the roots of 𝑃 as the quotient of the top two coefficients, and since the function 𝑇 enumerates the roots, we are left with an equation that sums the cot↑2 function at the 𝑀 different roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)((tan‘((𝑘 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2) = (((2 · 𝑀) · ((2 · 𝑀) − 1)) / 6))
Theorem	basellem6 27074	Lemma for basel 27078. The function 𝐺 goes to zero because it is bounded by 1 / 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ⇝ 0
Theorem	basellem7 27075	Lemma for basel 27078. The function 1 + 𝐴 · 𝐺 for any fixed 𝐴 goes to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {𝐴}) ∘f · 𝐺)) ⇝ 1
Theorem	basellem8 27076*	Lemma for basel 27078. The function 𝐹 of partial sums of the inverse squares is bounded below by 𝐽 and above by 𝐾, obtained by summing the inequality cot↑2𝑥 ≤ 1 / 𝑥↑2 ≤ csc↑2𝑥 = cot↑2𝑥 + 1 over the 𝑀 roots of the polynomial 𝑃, and applying the identity basellem5 27073. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐽‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑀) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐾‘𝑀)))
Theorem	basellem9 27077*	Lemma for basel 27078. Since by basellem8 27076 𝐹 is bounded by two expressions that tend to π↑2 / 6, 𝐹 must also go to π↑2 / 6 by the squeeze theorem climsqz 15601. But the series 𝐹 is exactly the partial sums of 𝑘↑-2, so it follows that this is also the value of the infinite sum Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ(𝑘↑-2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6)
Theorem	basel 27078	The sum of the inverse squares is π↑2 / 6. This is commonly known as the Basel problem, with the first known proof attributed to Euler. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_problem. This particular proof approach is due to Cauchy (1821). This is Metamath 100 proof #14. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6)
14.4.4  Number-theoretical functions
Syntax	ccht 27079	Extend class notation with the first Chebyshev function.
class θ
Syntax	cvma 27080	Extend class notation with the von Mangoldt function.
class Λ
Syntax	cchp 27081	Extend class notation with the second Chebyshev function.
class ψ
Syntax	cppi 27082	Extend class notation with the prime-counting function pi.
class π
Syntax	cmu 27083	Extend class notation with the Möbius function.
class μ
Syntax	csgm 27084	Extend class notation with the divisor function.
class σ
Definition	df-cht 27085*	Define the first Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of all primes less than 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 75. The symbol used to represent this function is sometimes the variant greek letter theta shown here and sometimes the greek letter psi, ψ; however, this notation can also refer to the second Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of prime powers instead, see df-chp 27087. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_function 27087 for a discussion of the two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ θ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑝 ∈ ((0[,]𝑥) ∩ ℙ)(log‘𝑝))
Definition	df-vma 27086*	Define the von Mangoldt function, which gives the logarithm of the prime at a prime power, and is zero elsewhere, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 32. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.)
⊢ Λ = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋{𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑥} / 𝑠⦌if((♯‘𝑠) = 1, (log‘∪ 𝑠), 0))
Definition	df-chp 27087*	Define the second Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of the primes corresponding to the prime powers less than 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 75. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.)
⊢ ψ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(Λ‘𝑛))
Definition	df-ppi 27088	Define the prime π function, which counts the number of primes less than or equal to 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 8. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ π = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (♯‘((0[,]𝑥) ∩ ℙ)))
Definition	df-mu 27089*	Define the Möbius function, which is zero for non-squarefree numbers and is -1 or 1 for squarefree numbers according as to the number of prime divisors of the number is even or odd, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 24. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ μ = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑2) ∥ 𝑥, 0, (-1↑(♯‘{𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑥}))))
Definition	df-sgm 27090*	Define the sum of positive divisors function (𝑥 σ 𝑛), which is the sum of the xth powers of the positive integer divisors of n, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 38. For 𝑥 = 0, (𝑥 σ 𝑛) counts the number of divisors of 𝑛, i.e. (0 σ 𝑛) is the divisor function, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 38. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ σ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛} (𝑘↑𝑐𝑥))
Theorem	efnnfsumcl 27091*	Finite sum closure in the log-integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (exp‘𝐵) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	ppisval 27092	The set of primes less than 𝐴 expressed using a finite set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) = ((2...(⌊‘𝐴)) ∩ ℙ))
Theorem	ppisval2 27093	The set of primes less than 𝐴 expressed using a finite set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) = ((𝑀...(⌊‘𝐴)) ∩ ℙ))
Theorem	ppifi 27094	The set of primes less than 𝐴 is a finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	prmdvdsfi 27095*	The set of prime divisors of a number is a finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → {𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	chtf 27096	Domain and codoamin of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ θ:ℝ⟶ℝ
Theorem	chtcl 27097	Real closure of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (θ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	chtval 27098*	Value of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (θ‘𝐴) = Σ𝑝 ∈ ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ)(log‘𝑝))
Theorem	efchtcl 27099	The Chebyshev function is closed in the log-integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (exp‘(θ‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	chtge0 27100	The Chebyshev function is always positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (θ‘𝐴))