| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 271 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50153) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dmgmaddn0 27001 | If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is nonzero for any nonnegative integer 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | dmlogdmgm 27002 | If 𝐴 is in the continuous domain of the logarithm, then it is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0)) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) | ||
| Theorem | rpdmgm 27003 | A positive real number is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) | ||
| Theorem | dmgmn0 27004 | If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | dmgmaddnn0 27005 | If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer and 𝑁 is a nonnegative integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is also not a nonpositive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) | ||
| Theorem | dmgmdivn0 27006 | Lemma for lgamf 27020. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝑀) + 1) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem1 27007* | Lemma for lgamgulm 27013. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem2 27008* | Lemma for lgamgulm 27013. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((1 / (𝑁 − 𝑅)) − (1 / 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem3 27009* | Lemma for lgamgulm 27013. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑁 + 1) / 𝑁))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑁↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem4 27010* | Lemma for lgamgulm 27013. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝑇) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem5 27011* | Lemma for lgamgulm 27013. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) → (abs‘((𝐺‘𝑛)‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑇‘𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulmlem6 27012* | The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈) ∧ (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ 𝑂) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘𝑂) ≤ 𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulm 27013* | The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lgamgulm2 27014* | Rewrite the limit of the sequence 𝐺 in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (log Γ‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((log Γ‘𝑧) + (log‘𝑧))))) | ||
| Theorem | lgambdd 27015* | The log-Gamma function is bounded on the region 𝑈. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘(log Γ‘𝑧)) ≤ 𝑟) | ||
| Theorem | lgamucov 27016* | The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27013 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ ((int‘𝐽)‘𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | lgamucov2 27017* | The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27013 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | lgamcvglem 27018* | Lemma for lgamf 27020 and lgamcvg 27032. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamcl 27019 | The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | lgamf 27020 | The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ log Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | gamf 27021 | The Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | gamcl 27022 | The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | eflgam 27023 | The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (exp‘(log Γ‘𝐴)) = (Γ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | gamne0 27024 | The Gamma function is never zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | igamval 27025 | Value of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = if(𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | igamz 27026 | Value of the inverse Gamma function on nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | igamgam 27027 | Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (Γ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | igamlgam 27028 | Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (exp‘-(log Γ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | igamf 27029 | Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 1/Γ:ℂ⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | igamcl 27030 | Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | gamigam 27031 | The Gamma function is the inverse of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (1/Γ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamcvg 27032* | The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴) + log(𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lgamcvg2 27033* | The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | gamcvg 27034* | The pointwise exponential of the series 𝐺 converges to Γ(𝐴) · 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | lgamp1 27035 | The functional equation of the (log) Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | gamp1 27036 | The functional equation of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | gamcvg2lem 27037* | Lemma for gamcvg2 27038. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) = seq1( · , 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | gamcvg2 27038* | An infinite product expression for the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | regamcl 27039 | The Gamma function is real for real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | relgamcl 27040 | The log-Gamma function is real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rpgamcl 27041 | The log-Gamma function is positive real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | lgam1 27042 | The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (log Γ‘1) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | gam1 27043 | The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (Γ‘1) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | facgam 27044 | The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝑁) = (Γ‘(𝑁 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | gamfac 27045 | The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Γ‘𝑁) = (!‘(𝑁 − 1))) | ||
| Theorem | wilthlem1 27046 | The only elements that are equal to their own inverses in the multiplicative group of nonzero elements in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ are 1 and -1≡𝑃 − 1. (Note that from prmdiveq 16725, (𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃 is the modular inverse of 𝑁 in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))) → (𝑁 = ((𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = (𝑃 − 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | wilthlem2 27047* |
Lemma for wilth 27049: induction step. The "hand proof"
version of this
theorem works by writing out the list of all numbers from 1 to
𝑃
− 1 in pairs such that a number is paired with its inverse.
Every number has a unique inverse different from itself except 1
and 𝑃 − 1, and so each pair
multiplies to 1, and 1 and
𝑃
− 1≡-1 multiply to -1, so the full
product is equal
to -1. Here we make this precise by doing the
product pair by
pair.
The induction hypothesis says that every subset 𝑆 of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse (i.e. all pairs are matched up) and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃. Given such a set, we take out one element 𝑧 ≠ 𝑃 − 1. If there are no such elements, then 𝑆 = {𝑃 − 1} which forms the base case. Otherwise, 𝑆 ∖ {𝑧, 𝑧↑-1} is also closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1, so the induction hypothesis says that this equals -1; and the remaining two elements are either equal to each other, in which case wilthlem1 27046 gives that 𝑧 = 1 or 𝑃 − 1, and we've already excluded the second case, so the product gives 1; or 𝑧 ≠ 𝑧↑-1 and their product is 1. In either case the accumulated product is unaffected. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑠)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑆)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | wilthlem3 27048* | Lemma for wilth 27049. Here we round out the argument of wilthlem2 27047 with the final step of the induction. The induction argument shows that every subset of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃, and clearly 1...(𝑃 − 1) itself is such a set. Thus, the product of all the elements is -1, and all that is left is to translate the group sum notation (which we used for its unordered summing capabilities) into an ordered sequence to match the definition of the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∥ ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) + 1)) | ||
| Theorem | wilth 27049 | Wilson's theorem. A number is prime iff it is greater than or equal to 2 and (𝑁 − 1)! is congruent to -1, mod 𝑁, or alternatively if 𝑁 divides (𝑁 − 1)! + 1. In this part of the proof we show the relatively simple reverse implication; see wilthlem3 27048 for the forward implication. This is Metamath 100 proof #51. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ ((!‘(𝑁 − 1)) + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | wilthimp 27050 | The forward implication of Wilson's theorem wilth 27049 (see wilthlem3 27048), expressed using the modulo operation: For any prime 𝑝 we have (𝑝 − 1)!≡ − 1 (mod 𝑝), see theorem 5.24 in [ApostolNT] p. 116. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem1 27051* | Lemma for fta 27058: "growth lemma". There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 is arbitrarily close in proportion to its dominant term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(abs‘(𝐴‘𝑘)) / 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑥) − ((𝐴‘𝑁) · (𝑥↑𝑁)))) < (𝐸 · ((abs‘𝑥)↑𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem2 27052* | Lemma for fta 27058. There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 has magnitude greater than 𝐹(0) outside the closed ball B(0,r). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = if(if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1) ≤ 𝑇, 𝑇, if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / ((abs‘(𝐴‘𝑁)) / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem3 27053* | Lemma for fta 27058. There exists a global minimum of the function abs ∘ 𝐹. The proof uses a circle of radius 𝑟 where 𝑟 is the value coming from ftalem1 27051; since this is a compact set, the minimum on this disk is achieved, and this must then be the global minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑅} & ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑅 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem4 27054* | Lemma for fta 27058: Closure of the auxiliary variables for ftalem5 27055. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0) & ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴‘𝐾) ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem5 27055* | Lemma for fta 27058: Main proof. We have already shifted the minimum found in ftalem3 27053 to zero by a change of variables, and now we show that the minimum value is zero. Expanding in a series about the minimum value, let 𝐾 be the lowest term in the polynomial that is nonzero, and let 𝑇 be a 𝐾-th root of -𝐹(0) / 𝐴(𝐾). Then an evaluation of 𝐹(𝑇𝑋) where 𝑋 is a sufficiently small positive number yields 𝐹(0) for the first term and -𝐹(0) · 𝑋↑𝐾 for the 𝐾-th term, and all higher terms are bounded because 𝑋 is small. Thus, abs(𝐹(𝑇𝑋)) ≤ abs(𝐹(0))(1 − 𝑋↑𝐾) < abs(𝐹(0)), in contradiction to our choice of 𝐹(0) as the minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0) & ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < ) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem6 27056* | Lemma for fta 27058: Discharge the auxiliary variables in ftalem5 27055. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0))) | ||
| Theorem | ftalem7 27057* | Lemma for fta 27058. Shift the minimum away from zero by a change of variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | fta 27058* | The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Any polynomial with positive degree (i.e. non-constant) has a root. This is Metamath 100 proof #2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆) ∧ (deg‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | basellem1 27059 | Lemma for basel 27068. Closure of the sequence of roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) Replace OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → ((𝐾 · π) / 𝑁) ∈ (0(,)(π / 2))) | ||
| Theorem | basellem2 27060* | Lemma for basel 27068. Show that 𝑃 is a polynomial of degree 𝑀, and compute its coefficient function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → (𝑃 ∈ (Poly‘ℂ) ∧ (deg‘𝑃) = 𝑀 ∧ (coeff‘𝑃) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑁C(2 · 𝑛)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑛)))))) | ||
| Theorem | basellem3 27061* | Lemma for basel 27068. Using the binomial theorem and de Moivre's formula, we have the identity e↑i𝑁𝑥 / (sin𝑥)↑𝑛 = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑁C𝑚)(i↑𝑚)(cot𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑚), so taking imaginary parts yields sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(𝑁C2𝑗)(-1)↑(𝑀 − 𝑗) (cot𝑥)↑(-2𝑗) = 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2), where 𝑁 = 2𝑀 + 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (0(,)(π / 2))) → (𝑃‘((tan‘𝐴)↑-2)) = ((sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) / ((sin‘𝐴)↑𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | basellem4 27062* | Lemma for basel 27068. By basellem3 27061, the expression 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2) = sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 goes to zero whenever 𝑥 = 𝑛π / 𝑁 for some 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀), so this function enumerates 𝑀 distinct roots of a degree- 𝑀 polynomial, which must therefore be all the roots by fta1 26284. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → 𝑇:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→(◡𝑃 “ {0})) | ||
| Theorem | basellem5 27063* | Lemma for basel 27068. Using vieta1 26288, we can calculate the sum of the roots of 𝑃 as the quotient of the top two coefficients, and since the function 𝑇 enumerates the roots, we are left with an equation that sums the cot↑2 function at the 𝑀 different roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)((tan‘((𝑘 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2) = (((2 · 𝑀) · ((2 · 𝑀) − 1)) / 6)) | ||
| Theorem | basellem6 27064 | Lemma for basel 27068. The function 𝐺 goes to zero because it is bounded by 1 / 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺 ⇝ 0 | ||
| Theorem | basellem7 27065 | Lemma for basel 27068. The function 1 + 𝐴 · 𝐺 for any fixed 𝐴 goes to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {𝐴}) ∘f · 𝐺)) ⇝ 1 | ||
| Theorem | basellem8 27066* | Lemma for basel 27068. The function 𝐹 of partial sums of the inverse squares is bounded below by 𝐽 and above by 𝐾, obtained by summing the inequality cot↑2𝑥 ≤ 1 / 𝑥↑2 ≤ csc↑2𝑥 = cot↑2𝑥 + 1 over the 𝑀 roots of the polynomial 𝑃, and applying the identity basellem5 27063. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐽‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑀) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐾‘𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | basellem9 27067* | Lemma for basel 27068. Since by basellem8 27066 𝐹 is bounded by two expressions that tend to π↑2 / 6, 𝐹 must also go to π↑2 / 6 by the squeeze theorem climsqz 15576. But the series 𝐹 is exactly the partial sums of 𝑘↑-2, so it follows that this is also the value of the infinite sum Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ(𝑘↑-2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6) | ||
| Theorem | basel 27068 | The sum of the inverse squares is π↑2 / 6. This is commonly known as the Basel problem, with the first known proof attributed to Euler. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_problem. This particular proof approach is due to Cauchy (1821). This is Metamath 100 proof #14. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6) | ||
| Syntax | ccht 27069 | Extend class notation with the first Chebyshev function. |
| class θ | ||
| Syntax | cvma 27070 | Extend class notation with the von Mangoldt function. |
| class Λ | ||
| Syntax | cchp 27071 | Extend class notation with the second Chebyshev function. |
| class ψ | ||
| Syntax | cppi 27072 | Extend class notation with the prime-counting function pi. |
| class π | ||
| Syntax | cmu 27073 | Extend class notation with the Möbius function. |
| class μ | ||
| Syntax | csgm 27074 | Extend class notation with the divisor function. |
| class σ | ||
| Definition | df-cht 27075* | Define the first Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of all primes less than 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 75. The symbol used to represent this function is sometimes the variant greek letter theta shown here and sometimes the greek letter psi, ψ; however, this notation can also refer to the second Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of prime powers instead, see df-chp 27077. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_function 27077 for a discussion of the two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ θ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑝 ∈ ((0[,]𝑥) ∩ ℙ)(log‘𝑝)) | ||
| Definition | df-vma 27076* | Define the von Mangoldt function, which gives the logarithm of the prime at a prime power, and is zero elsewhere, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 32. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ Λ = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋{𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑥} / 𝑠⦌if((♯‘𝑠) = 1, (log‘∪ 𝑠), 0)) | ||
| Definition | df-chp 27077* | Define the second Chebyshev function, which adds up the logarithms of the primes corresponding to the prime powers less than 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 75. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ψ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(Λ‘𝑛)) | ||
| Definition | df-ppi 27078 | Define the prime π function, which counts the number of primes less than or equal to 𝑥, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 8. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ π = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (♯‘((0[,]𝑥) ∩ ℙ))) | ||
| Definition | df-mu 27079* | Define the Möbius function, which is zero for non-squarefree numbers and is -1 or 1 for squarefree numbers according as to the number of prime divisors of the number is even or odd, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 24. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ μ = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑2) ∥ 𝑥, 0, (-1↑(♯‘{𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑥})))) | ||
| Definition | df-sgm 27080* | Define the sum of positive divisors function (𝑥 σ 𝑛), which is the sum of the xth powers of the positive integer divisors of n, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 38. For 𝑥 = 0, (𝑥 σ 𝑛) counts the number of divisors of 𝑛, i.e. (0 σ 𝑛) is the divisor function, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 38. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ σ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛} (𝑘↑𝑐𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | efnnfsumcl 27081* | Finite sum closure in the log-integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (exp‘𝐵) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp‘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | ppisval 27082 | The set of primes less than 𝐴 expressed using a finite set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) = ((2...(⌊‘𝐴)) ∩ ℙ)) | ||
| Theorem | ppisval2 27083 | The set of primes less than 𝐴 expressed using a finite set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) = ((𝑀...(⌊‘𝐴)) ∩ ℙ)) | ||
| Theorem | ppifi 27084 | The set of primes less than 𝐴 is a finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | prmdvdsfi 27085* | The set of prime divisors of a number is a finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → {𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐴} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | chtf 27086 | Domain and codoamin of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ θ:ℝ⟶ℝ | ||
| Theorem | chtcl 27087 | Real closure of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (θ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | chtval 27088* | Value of the Chebyshev function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (θ‘𝐴) = Σ𝑝 ∈ ((0[,]𝐴) ∩ ℙ)(log‘𝑝)) | ||
| Theorem | efchtcl 27089 | The Chebyshev function is closed in the log-integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (exp‘(θ‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | chtge0 27090 | The Chebyshev function is always positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (θ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | vmaval 27091* | Value of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐴} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (Λ‘𝐴) = if((♯‘𝑆) = 1, (log‘∪ 𝑆), 0)) | ||
| Theorem | isppw 27092* | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ((Λ‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isppw2 27093* | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ((Λ‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑝↑𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | vmappw 27094 | Value of the von Mangoldt function at a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) → (Λ‘(𝑃↑𝐾)) = (log‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | vmaprm 27095 | Value of the von Mangoldt function at a prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (Λ‘𝑃) = (log‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | vmacl 27096 | Closure for the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (Λ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | vmaf 27097 | Functionality of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ Λ:ℕ⟶ℝ | ||
| Theorem | efvmacl 27098 | The von Mangoldt is closed in the log-integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (exp‘(Λ‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | vmage0 27099 | The von Mangoldt function is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 ≤ (Λ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chpval 27100* | Value of the second Chebyshev function, or summary von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (ψ‘𝐴) = Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(Λ‘𝑛)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |