P. 110 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10901-11000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	wfgru 10901	The wellfounded part of a universe is another universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ Univ → (𝑈 ∩ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grudomon 10902	Each ordinal that is comparable with an element of the universe is in the universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	gruina 10903	If a Grothendieck universe 𝑈 is nonempty, then the height of the ordinals in 𝑈 is a strongly inaccessible cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ Inacc)
Theorem	grur1a 10904	A characterization of Grothendieck universes, part 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ Univ → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	grur1 10905	A characterization of Grothendieck universes, part 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → 𝑈 = (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	grutsk1 10906	Grothendieck universes are the same as transitive Tarski classes, part one: a transitive Tarski class is a universe. (The hard work is in tskuni 10868.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grutsk 10907	Grothendieck universes are the same as transitive Tarski classes. (The proof in the forward direction requires Foundation.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ Tr 𝑥}
4.2  ZFC Set Theory plus the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom
4.2.1  Introduce the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom
Axiom	ax-groth 10908*	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. For every set 𝑥 there is an inaccessible cardinal 𝑦 such that 𝑦 is not in 𝑥. The addition of this axiom to ZFC set theory provides a framework for category theory, thus for all practical purposes giving us a complete foundation for "all of mathematics". This version of the axiom is used by the Mizar project (http://www.mizar.org/JFM/Axiomatics/tarski.html). Unlike the ZFC axioms, this axiom is very long when expressed in terms of primitive symbols (see grothprim 10919). An open problem is finding a shorter equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑧 ≈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	axgroth5 10909*	The Tarski-Grothendieck axiom using abbreviations. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2009.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑧 ≈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	axgroth2 10910*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
4.2.2  Derive the Power Set, Infinity and Choice Axioms
Theorem	grothpw 10911*	Derive the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5326 from the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom ax-groth 10908. That it follows is mentioned by Bob Solovay at https://fomarchive.ugent.be/2008-March/012783.html 10908. Note that ax-pow 5326 is not used by the proof. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 22-Jun-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	grothpwex 10912	Derive the Axiom of Power Sets from the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom ax-groth 10908. Note that ax-pow 5326 is not used by the proof. Use axpweq 5311 to obtain ax-pow 5326. Use pwex 5341 or pwexg 5339 instead. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 22-Jun-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	axgroth6 10913*	The Tarski-Grothendieck axiom using abbreviations. This version is called Tarski's axiom: given a set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 containing 𝑥, the subsets of the members of 𝑦, the power sets of the members of 𝑦, and the subsets of 𝑦 of cardinality less than that of 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑧 ≺ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	grothomex 10914	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom implies the Axiom of Infinity (in the form of omex 9644). Note that our proof depends on neither the Axiom of Infinity nor Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.) Use omex 9644 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ω ∈ V
Theorem	grothac 10915	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom implies the Axiom of Choice (in the form of cardeqv 10547). This can be put in a more conventional form via ween 10114 and dfac8 10214. Note that the mere existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals doesn't imply AC, but rather the particular form of the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom (see https://fomarchive.ugent.be/2008-March/012783.html 10214). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom card = V
Theorem	axgroth3 10916*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. ax-cc 10513 is used to derive this version. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑦 ∖ 𝑧) ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	axgroth4 10917*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. ax-ac 10537 is used to derive this version. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑦 ∖ 𝑧) ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	grothprimlem 10918*	Lemma for grothprim 10919. Expand the membership of an unordered pair into primitives. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ({𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑢 ∨ ℎ = 𝑣))))
Theorem	grothprim 10919*	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom ax-groth 10908 expanded into set theory primitives using 163 symbols (allowing the defined symbols ∧, ∨, ↔, and ∃). An open problem is whether a shorter equivalent exists (when expanded to primitives). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑣(𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑤(∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧) → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)))) ∧ ∃𝑤((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) → (∀𝑣((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 → ∃𝑡∀𝑢(∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑣 ∨ ℎ = 𝑢))) → 𝑢 = 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∨ ∃𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑢 ∨ ℎ = 𝑣))))))) ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
Theorem	grothtsk 10920	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom, using abbreviations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.)
⊢ ∪ Tarski = V
Theorem	inaprc 10921	An equivalent to the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom: there is a proper class of inaccessible cardinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Inacc ∉ V
4.2.3  Tarski map function
Syntax	ctskm 10922	Extend class definition to include the map whose value is the smallest Tarski class.
class tarskiMap
Definition	df-tskm 10923*	A function that maps a set 𝑥 to the smallest Tarski class that contains the set. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ tarskiMap = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦})
Theorem	tskmval 10924*	Value of our tarski map. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (tarskiMap‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥})
Theorem	tskmid 10925	The set 𝐴 is an element of the smallest Tarski class that contains 𝐴. CLASSES1 th. 5. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴))
Theorem	tskmcl 10926	A Tarski class that contains 𝐴 is a Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski
Theorem	sstskm 10927*	Being a part of (tarskiMap‘𝐴). (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ⊆ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥)))
Theorem	eltskm 10928*	Belonging to (tarskiMap‘𝐴). (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))
PART 5  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. We first construct and axiomatize real and complex numbers (e.g., ax-resscn 11257). After that, we derive their basic properties, various operations like addition (df-add 11211) and sine (df-sin 16235), and subsets such as the integers (df-z 12694) and natural numbers (df-nn 12336).
5.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
5.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 10929	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers ω with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers. The last lemma of the construction is mulcnsrec 11229. The actual set of Dedekind cuts is defined by df-np 11066.
class N
Syntax	cpli 10930	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 10931	Positive integer multiplication.
class ·N
Syntax	clti 10932	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 10933	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 10934	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class ·pQ
Syntax	cltpq 10935	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 10936	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 10937	Set of positive fractions.
class Q
Syntax	c1q 10938	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cerq 10939	Positive fraction equivalence class.
class [Q]
Syntax	cplq 10940	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 10941	Positive fraction multiplication.
class ·Q
Syntax	crq 10942	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 10943	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	cnp 10944	Set of positive reals.
class P
Syntax	c1p 10945	Positive real constant 1.
class 1P
Syntax	cpp 10946	Positive real addition.
class +P
Syntax	cmp 10947	Positive real multiplication.
class ·P
Syntax	cltp 10948	Positive real ordering relation.
class <P
Syntax	cer 10949	Equivalence class used to construct signed reals.
class ~R
Syntax	cnr 10950	Set of signed reals.
class R
Syntax	c0r 10951	The signed real constant 0.
class 0R
Syntax	c1r 10952	The signed real constant 1.
class 1R
Syntax	cm1r 10953	The signed real constant -1.
class -1R
Syntax	cplr 10954	Signed real addition.
class +R
Syntax	cmr 10955	Signed real multiplication.
class ·R
Syntax	cltr 10956	Signed real ordering relation.
class <R
Definition	df-ni 10957	Define the class of positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ N = (ω ∖ {∅})
Definition	df-pli 10958	Define addition on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +N = ( +o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-mi 10959	Define multiplication on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·N = ( ·o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-lti 10960	Define 'less than' on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N = ( E ∩ (N × N))
Theorem	elni 10961	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	elni2 10962	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	pinn 10963	A positive integer is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	pion 10964	A positive integer is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	piord 10965	A positive integer is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	niex 10966	The class of positive integers is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ N ∈ V
Theorem	0npi 10967	The empty set is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ N
Theorem	1pi 10968	Ordinal 'one' is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ∈ N
Theorem	addpiord 10969	Positive integer addition in terms of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulpiord 10970	Positive integer multiplication in terms of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulidpi 10971	1 is an identity element for multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → (𝐴 ·N 1o) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltpiord 10972	Positive integer 'less than' in terms of ordinal membership. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ltsopi 10973	Positive integer 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N Or N
Theorem	ltrelpi 10974	Positive integer 'less than' is a relation on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N ⊆ (N × N)
Theorem	dmaddpi 10975	Domain of addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom +N = (N × N)
Theorem	dmmulpi 10976	Domain of multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom ·N = (N × N)
Theorem	addclpi 10977	Closure of addition of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	mulclpi 10978	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	addcompi 10979	Addition of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐵 +N 𝐴)
Theorem	addasspi 10980	Addition of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 +N 𝐵) +N 𝐶) = (𝐴 +N (𝐵 +N 𝐶))
Theorem	mulcompi 10981	Multiplication of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·N 𝐴)
Theorem	mulasspi 10982	Multiplication of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ·N 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 ·N 𝐶))
Theorem	distrpi 10983	Multiplication of positive integers is distributive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 +N 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) +N (𝐴 ·N 𝐶))
Theorem	addcanpi 10984	Addition cancellation law for positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +N 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	mulcanpi 10985	Multiplication cancellation law for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·N 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addnidpi 10986	There is no identity element for addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → ¬ (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltexpi 10987*	Ordering on positive integers in terms of existence of sum. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ N (𝐴 +N 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	ltapi 10988	Ordering property of addition for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ N → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +N 𝐴) <N (𝐶 +N 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltmpi 10989	Ordering property of multiplication for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ N → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ·N 𝐴) <N (𝐶 ·N 𝐵)))
Theorem	1lt2pi 10990	One is less than two (one plus one). (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o <N (1o +N 1o)
Theorem	nlt1pi 10991	No positive integer is less than one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 <N 1o
Theorem	indpi 10992*	Principle of Finite Induction on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1o → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 +N 1o) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ N → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝜏)
Definition	df-plpq 10993*	Define pre-addition on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. This "pre-addition" operation works directly with ordered pairs of integers. The actual positive fraction addition +Q (df-plq 10999) works with the equivalence classes of these ordered pairs determined by the equivalence relation ~Q (df-enq 10996). (Analogous remarks apply to the other "pre-" operations in the complex number construction that follows.) From Proposition 9-2.3 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +pQ = (𝑥 ∈ (N × N), 𝑦 ∈ (N × N) ↦ ⟨(((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦)) +N ((1st ‘𝑦) ·N (2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦))⟩)
Definition	df-mpq 10994*	Define pre-multiplication on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·pQ = (𝑥 ∈ (N × N), 𝑦 ∈ (N × N) ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (1st ‘𝑦)), ((2nd ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦))⟩)
Definition	df-ltpq 10995*	Define pre-ordering relation on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. Similar to Definition 5 of [Suppes] p. 162. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <pQ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (N × N)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦)) <N ((1st ‘𝑦) ·N (2nd ‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-enq 10996*	Define equivalence relation for positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.1 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ~Q = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (N × N)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 ·N 𝑢) = (𝑤 ·N 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-nq 10997*	Define class of positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Q = {𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ (N × N)(𝑥 ~Q 𝑦 → ¬ (2nd ‘𝑦) <N (2nd ‘𝑥))}
Definition	df-erq 10998	Define a convenience function that "reduces" a fraction to lowest terms. Note that in this form, it is not obviously a function; we prove this in nqerf 11015. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ [Q] = ( ~Q ∩ ((N × N) × Q))
Definition	df-plq 10999	Define addition on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.3 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +Q = (([Q] ∘ +pQ ) ↾ (Q × Q))
Definition	df-mq 11000	Define multiplication on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11206, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·Q = (([Q] ∘ ·pQ ) ↾ (Q × Q))