P. 324 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 32301-32400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	goeqi 32301	Godowski's equation, shown here as a variant equivalent to Equation SF of [Godowski] p. 730. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻) ⊆ 𝐷
Theorem	stcltr1i 32302*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	stcltr2i 32303*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → 𝐴 = ℋ))
Theorem	stcltrlem1 32304*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐵) = 1 → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = 1))
Theorem	stcltrlem2 32305*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	stcltrthi 32306*	Theorem for classically strong set of states. If there exists a "classically strong set of states" on lattice Cℋ (or actually any ortholattice, which would have an identical proof), then any two elements of the lattice commute, i.e., the lattice is distributive. (Proof due to Mladen Pavicic.) Theorem 3.3 of [MegPav2000] p. 2344. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∃𝑠 ∈ States ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑠‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑠‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
20.8  Cover relation, atoms, exchange axiom, and modular symmetry
20.8.1  Covers relation; modular pairs
Definition	df-cv 32307*	Define the covers relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68, whose notation we use. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See cvbr 32310 and cvbr2 32311 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⋖ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ⊊ 𝑦)))}
Definition	df-md 32308*	Define the modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a modular pair." See mdbr 32322 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))}
Definition	df-dmd 32309*	Define the dual modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M* for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a dual modular pair." See dmdbr 32327 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ* = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑥) ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦))))}
Theorem	cvbr 32310*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvbr2 32311*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvcon3 32312	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⋖ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cvpss 32313	The covers relation implies proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvnbtwn 32314	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn2 32315	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn3 32316	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn4 32317	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvnsym 32318	The covers relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvnref 32319	The covers relation is not reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cvntr 32320	The covers relation is not transitive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	spansncv2 32321	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (¬ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))))
Theorem	mdbr 32322*	Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdi 32323	Consequence of the modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdbr2 32324*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than mdbr 32322. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdbr3 32325*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdbr4 32326*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr 32327*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	dmdmd 32328	The dual modular pair property expressed in terms of the modular pair property, that hold in Hilbert lattices. Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	mddmd 32329	The modular pair property expressed in terms of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi 32330	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr2 32331*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than dmdbr 32327. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdi2 32332	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr3 32333*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr4 32334*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi4 32335	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr5 32336*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmd2 32337*	Relationship between modular pairs and dual-modular pairs. Lemma 1.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝑥))
Theorem	mdsl0 32338	A sublattice condition that transfers the modular pair property. Exercise 12 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. Also Lemma 1.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷))
Theorem	ssmd1 32339	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssmd2 32340	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssdmd1 32341	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	ssdmd2 32342	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (⊥‘𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsl3 32343	Sublattice mapping for a dual-modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdsl3 32344	Sublattice mapping for a modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdslle1i 32345	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslle2i 32346	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdslj1i 32347	Join preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslj2i 32348	Meet preservation of the reverse mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsl1i 32349*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdsl2i 32350*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsl2bi 32351*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvmdi 32352	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdslmd1lem1 32353	Lemma for mdslmd1i 32357. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem2 32354	Lemma for mdslmd1i 32357. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem3 32355*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 32357. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem4 32356*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 32357. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1i 32357	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (meet version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd2i 32358	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (join version). (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsldmd1i 32359	Preservation of the dual modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ* 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd3i 32360	Modular pair conditions that imply the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ 𝐶) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	mdslmd4i 32361	Modular pair condition that implies the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷)
Theorem	csmdsymi 32362*	Cross-symmetry implies M-symmetry. Theorem 1.9.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑐 ∈ Cℋ (𝑐 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝑐) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdexchi 32363	An exchange lemma for modular pairs. Lemma 1.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 𝑀ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvmd 32364	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cvdmd 32365	The covering property implies the dual modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
20.8.2  Atoms
Definition	df-at 32366	Define the set of atoms in a Hilbert lattice. An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. See ela 32367 and elat2 32368 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms = {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝑥}
Theorem	ela 32367	Atoms in a Hilbert lattice are the elements that cover the zero subspace. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	elat2 32368*	Expanded membership relation for the set of atoms, i.e. the predicate "is an atom (of the Hilbert lattice)." An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 0ℋ)))))
Theorem	elatcv0 32369	A Hilbert lattice element is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcv0 32370	An atom covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	atssch 32371	Atoms are a subset of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms ⊆ Cℋ
Theorem	atelch 32372	An atom is a Hilbert lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	atne0 32373	An atom is not the Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)
Theorem	atss 32374	A lattice element smaller than an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
Theorem	atsseq 32375	Two atoms in a subset relationship are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcveq0 32376	A Hilbert lattice element covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1da 32377	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐴})) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	spansna 32378	The span of the singleton of a vector is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (span‘{𝐴}) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	sh1dle 32379	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any subspace containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ch1dle 32380	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any member of Cℋ containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	atom1d 32381*	The 1-dimensional subspaces of Hilbert space are its atoms. Part of Remark 10.3.5 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 = (span‘{𝑥})))
20.8.3  Superposition principle
Theorem	superpos 32382*	Superposition Principle. If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are distinct atoms, there exists a third atom, distinct from 𝐴 and 𝐵, that is the superposition of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Definition 3.4-3(a) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
20.8.4  Atoms, exchange and covering properties, atomicity
Theorem	chcv1 32383	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chcv2 32384	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chjatom 32385	The join of a closed subspace and an atom equals their subspace sum. Special case of remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65, stating that if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is finite-dimensional, then this equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shatomici 32386*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomici 32387*	The Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomic 32388*	A Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. Also Definition 3.4-2 in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	shatomistici 32389*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (span‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	hatomistici 32390*	Cℋ is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	chpssati 32391*	Two Hilbert lattice elements in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	chrelati 32392*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2i 32393*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvati 32394*	If a Hilbert lattice element covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	cvbr4i 32395*	An alternate way to express the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchlem 32396	Lemma for cvexchi 32397. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchi 32397	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2 32398*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3 32399*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3i 32400*	A consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space: the ordering of Hilbert lattice elements is completely determined by the atoms they majorize. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))