P. 441 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44001-44100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	frege131d 44001	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 contains all elements of 𝑈 and all elements before or after those elements of 𝑈 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then the image under 𝐹 of 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐴. Similar to Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. Compare with frege131 44231. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∪ ((◡(t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈) ∪ ((t+‘𝐹) “ 𝑈))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	frege133d 44002	If 𝐹 is a function and 𝐴 and 𝐵 both follow 𝑋 in the transitive closure of 𝐹, then (for distinct 𝐴 and 𝐵) either 𝐴 follows 𝐵 or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝐹 (or both if it loops). Similar to Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. Compare with frege133 44233. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝐹)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝐹)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵(t+‘𝐹)𝐴))
21.36.6  Propositions from _Begriffsschrift_ In 1879, Frege introduced notation for documenting formal reasoning about propositions (and classes) which covered elements of propositional logic, predicate calculus and reasoning about relations. However, due to the pitfalls of naive set theory, adapting this work for inclusion in set.mm required dividing statements about propositions from those about classes and identifying when a restriction to sets is required. For an overview comparing the details of Frege's two-dimensional notation and that used in set.mm, see mmfrege.html. See ru 3738 for discussion of an example of a class that is not a set. Numbered propositions from [Frege1879]. ax-frege1 44027, ax-frege2 44028, ax-frege8 44046, ax-frege28 44067, ax-frege31 44071, ax-frege41 44082, frege52 (see ax-frege52a 44094, frege52b 44126, and ax-frege52c 44125 for translations), frege54 (see ax-frege54a 44099, frege54b 44130 and ax-frege54c 44129 for translations) and frege58 (see ax-frege58a 44112, ax-frege58b 44138 and frege58c 44158 for translations) are considered "core" or axioms. However, at least ax-frege8 44046 can be derived from ax-frege1 44027 and ax-frege2 44028, see axfrege8 44044. Frege introduced implication, negation and the universal quantifier as primitives and did not in the numbered propositions use other logical connectives other than equivalence introduced in ax-frege52a 44094, frege52b 44126, and ax-frege52c 44125. In dffrege69 44169, Frege introduced 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 to say that relation 𝑅, when restricted to operate on elements of class 𝐴, will only have elements of class 𝐴 in its domain; see df-he 44010 for a definition in terms of image and subset. In dffrege76 44176, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌, which requires 𝑅 to also be a set. In dffrege99 44199, Frege introduced notation for the concept of two sets either identical or related by the transitive closure of a relation, for which we write 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌, which is a superclass of sets related by the reflexive-transitive relation 𝑋(t*‘𝑅)𝑌. Finally, in dffrege115 44215, Frege introduced notation for the concept of a relation having the property elements in its domain pair up with only one element each in its range, for which we write Fun ◡◡𝑅 (to ignore any non-relational content of the class 𝑅). Frege did this without the expressing concept of a relation (or its transitive closure) as a class, and needed to invent conventions for discussing indeterminate propositions with two slots free and how to recognize which of the slots was domain and which was range. See mmfrege.html 44215 for details. English translations for specific propositions lifted in part from a translation by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg as reprinted in From Frege to Goedel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. An attempt to align these propositions in the larger set.mm database has also been made. See frege77d 43983 for an example.
21.36.6.1  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter I Section 2 introduces the turnstile ⊢ which turns an idea which may be true 𝜑 into an assertion that it does hold true ⊢ 𝜑. Section 5 introduces implication, (𝜑 → 𝜓). Section 6 introduces the single rule of interference relied upon, modus ponens ax-mp 5. Section 7 introduces negation and with in synonyms for or (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) , and ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓), and two for exclusive-or corresponding to df-or 848, df-an 396, dfxor4 44003, dfxor5 44004. Section 8 introduces the problematic notation for identity of conceptual content which must be separated into cases for biconditional (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) or class equality 𝐴 = 𝐵 in this adaptation. Section 10 introduces "truth functions" for one or two variables in equally troubling notation, as the arguments may be understood to be logical predicates or collections. Here f(𝜑) is interpreted to mean if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) where the content of the "function" is specified by the latter two arguments or logical equivalent, while g(𝐴) is read as 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and h(𝐴, 𝐵) as 𝐴𝐻𝐵. This necessarily introduces a need for set theory as both 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 and 𝐴𝐻𝐵 cannot hold unless 𝐴 is a set. (Also 𝐵.) Section 11 introduces notation for generality, but there is no standard notation for generality when the variable is a proposition because it was realized after Frege that the universe of all possible propositions includes paradoxical constructions leading to the failure of naive set theory. So adopting f(𝜑) as if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) would result in the translation of ∀𝜑 f (𝜑) as (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). For collections, we must generalize over set variables or run into the same problems; this leads to ∀𝐴 g(𝐴) being translated as ∀𝑎𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 and so forth. Under this interpreation the text of section 11 gives us sp 2190 (or simpl 482 and simpr 484 and anifp 1071 in the propositional case) and statements similar to cbvalivw 2008, ax-gen 1796, alrimiv 1928, and alrimdv 1930. These last four introduce a generality and have no useful definition in terms of propositional variables. Section 12 introduces some combinations of primitive symbols and their human language counterparts. Using class notation, these can also be expressed without dummy variables. All are A, ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 alex 1827, 𝐴 = V eqv 3450; Some are not B, ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 exnal 1828, 𝐵 ⊊ V pssv 4401, 𝐵 ≠ V nev 44007; There are no C, ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, ¬ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 alnex 1782, 𝐶 = ∅ eq0 4302; There exist D, ¬ ∀𝑥¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 df-ex 1781, ∅ ⊊ 𝐷 0pss 4399, 𝐷 ≠ ∅ n0 4305. Notation for relations between expressions also can be written in various ways. All E are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) dfss6 3923, 𝐸 = (𝐸 ∩ 𝑃) dfss2 3919, 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑃 df-ss 3918; No F are P, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) alinexa 1844, (𝐹 ∩ 𝑃) = ∅ disj1 4404; Some G are not P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exanali 1860, (𝐺 ∩ 𝑃) ⊊ 𝐺 nssinpss 4219, ¬ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑃 nss 3998; Some H are P, ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃), ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) exnalimn 1845, ∅ ⊊ (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) 0pssin 44008, (𝐻 ∩ 𝑃) ≠ ∅ ndisj 4322.
Theorem	dfxor4 44003	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfxor5 44004	Express exclusive-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	df3or2 44005	Express triple-or in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 11. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3an2 44006	Express triple-and in terms of implication and negation. Statement in [Frege1879] p. 12. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	nev 44007*	Express that not every set is in a class. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ V ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	0pssin 44008*	Express that an intersection is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ⊊ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21.36.6.2  _Begriffsschrift_ Notation hints The statement 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 means relation 𝑅 is hereditary (in the sense of Frege) in the class 𝐴 or (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴. The former is only a slight reduction in the number of symbols, but this reduces the number of floating hypotheses needed to be checked. As Frege was not using the language of classes or sets, this naturally differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on.
Syntax	whe 44009	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴.
wff 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴
Definition	df-he 44010	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfhe2 44011	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	dfhe3 44012*	The property of relation 𝑅 being hereditary in class 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	heeq12 44013	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	heeq1 44014	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	heeq2 44015	Equality law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐵))
Theorem	sbcheg 44016	Distribute proper substitution through herditary relation. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 hereditary 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 hereditary ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	hess 44017	Subclass law for relations being herditary over a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑅 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴))
Theorem	xphe 44018	Any Cartesian product is hereditary in its second class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) hereditary 𝐵
Theorem	0he 44019	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	0heALT 44020	The empty relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	he0 44021	Any relation is hereditary in the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 hereditary ∅
Theorem	unhe1 44022	The union of two relations hereditary in a class is also hereditary in a class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 hereditary 𝐴) → (𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	snhesn 44023	Any singleton is hereditary in any singleton. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩} hereditary {𝐵}
Theorem	idhe 44024	The identity relation is hereditary in any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ I hereditary 𝐴
Theorem	psshepw 44025	The relation between sets and their proper subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ◡ [⊊] hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	sshepw 44026	The relation between sets and their subsets is hereditary in the powerclass of any class. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡ [⊊] ∪ I ) hereditary 𝒫 𝐴
21.36.6.3  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication
Axiom	ax-frege1 44027	The case in which 𝜑 is denied, 𝜓 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed is excluded. This is evident since 𝜑 cannot at the same time be denied and affirmed. Axiom 1 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-1 6. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege2 44028	If a proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of two propositions 𝜓 and 𝜑 and one of those, 𝜓, is in turn a necessary consequence of the other, 𝜑, then the proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the latter one, 𝜑, alone. Axiom 2 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-2 7. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-simp2-frege 44029	Simplification of triple conjunction. Compare with simp2 1137. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-simp2 44030	Simplification of triple conjunction. Identical to simp2 1137. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	rp-frege3g 44031	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 44028. More general statement than frege3 44032. Like ax-frege2 44028, it is essentially a closed form of mpd 15, however it has an extra antecedent. It would be more natural to prove from a1i 11 and ax-frege2 44028 in Metamath. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege3 44032	Add antecedent to ax-frege2 44028. Special case of rp-frege3g 44031. Proposition 3 of [Frege1879] p. 29. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	rp-misc1-frege 44033	Double-use of ax-frege2 44028. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rp-frege24 44034	Introducing an embedded antecedent. Alternate proof for frege24 44052. Closed form for a1d 25. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-frege4g 44035	Deduction related to distribution. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege4 44036	Special case of closed form of a2d 29. Special case of rp-frege4g 44035. Proposition 4 of [Frege1879] p. 31. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	frege5 44037	A closed form of syl 17. Identical to imim2 58. Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. Proposition 5 of [Frege1879] p. 32. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rp-7frege 44038	Distribute antecedent and add another. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜃 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-4frege 44039	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	rp-6frege 44040	Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-8frege 44041	Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-frege25 44042	Closed form for a1dd 50. Alternate route to Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege6 44043	A closed form of imim2d 57 which is a deduction adding nested antecedents. Proposition 6 of [Frege1879] p. 33. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	axfrege8 44044	Swap antecedents. Identical to pm2.04 90. This demonstrates that Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35 is redundant. Proof follows closely proof of pm2.04 90 in https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt 90, but in the style of Frege's 1879 work. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege7 44045	A closed form of syl6 35. The first antecedent is used to replace the consequent of the second antecedent. Proposition 7 of [Frege1879] p. 34. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))))
Axiom	ax-frege8 44046	Swap antecedents. If two conditions have a proposition as a consequence, their order is immaterial. Third axiom of Frege's 1879 work but identical to pm2.04 90 which can be proved from only ax-mp 5, ax-frege1 44027, and ax-frege2 44028. (Redundant) Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege26 44047	Identical to idd 24. Proposition 26 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege27 44048	We cannot (at the same time) affirm 𝜑 and deny 𝜑. Identical to id 22. Proposition 27 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege9 44049	Closed form of syl 17 with swapped antecedents. This proposition differs from frege5 44037 only in an unessential way. Identical to imim1 83. Proposition 9 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege12 44050	A closed form of com23 86. Proposition 12 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege11 44051	Elimination of a nested antecedent as a partial converse of ja 186. If the proposition that 𝜓 takes place or 𝜑 does not is a sufficient condition for 𝜒, then 𝜓 by itself is a sufficient condition for 𝜒. Identical to jarr 106. Proposition 11 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege24 44052	Closed form for a1d 25. Deduction introducing an embedded antecedent. Identical to rp-frege24 44034 which was proved without relying on ax-frege8 44046. Proposition 24 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege16 44053	A closed form of com34 91. Proposition 16 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege25 44054	Closed form for a1dd 50. Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege18 44055	Closed form of a syllogism followed by a swap of antecedents. Proposition 18 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege22 44056	A closed form of com45 97. Proposition 22 of [Frege1879] p. 41. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))
Theorem	frege10 44057	Result commuting antecedents within an antecedent. Proposition 10 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege17 44058	A closed form of com3l 89. Proposition 17 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege13 44059	A closed form of com3r 87. Proposition 13 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege14 44060	Closed form of a deduction based on com3r 87. Proposition 14 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege19 44061	A closed form of syl6 35. Proposition 19 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege23 44062	Syllogism followed by rotation of three antecedents. Proposition 23 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜃)))))
Theorem	frege15 44063	A closed form of com4r 94. Proposition 15 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege21 44064	Replace antecedent in antecedent. Proposition 21 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege20 44065	A closed form of syl8 76. Proposition 20 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜃 → 𝜏) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
21.36.6.4  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication and Negation
Theorem	axfrege28 44066	Contraposition. Identical to con3 153. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege28 44067	Contraposition. Identical to con3 153. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. Axiom 28 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege29 44068	Closed form of con3d 152. Proposition 29 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege30 44069	Commuted, closed form of con3d 152. Proposition 30 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑)))
Theorem	axfrege31 44070	Identical to notnotr 130. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege31 44071	𝜑 cannot be denied and (at the same time ) ¬ ¬ 𝜑 affirmed. Duplex negatio affirmat. The denial of the denial is affirmation. Identical to notnotr 130. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege32 44072	Deduce con1 146 from con3 153. Proposition 32 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege33 44073	If 𝜑 or 𝜓 takes place, then 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place. Identical to con1 146. Proposition 33 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege34 44074	If as a consequence of the occurrence of the circumstance 𝜑, when the obstacle 𝜓 is removed, 𝜒 takes place, then from the circumstance that 𝜒 does not take place while 𝜑 occurs the occurrence of the obstacle 𝜓 can be inferred. Closed form of con1d 145. Proposition 34 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege35 44075	Commuted, closed form of con1d 145. Proposition 35 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege36 44076	The case in which 𝜓 is denied, ¬ 𝜑 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed does not occur. If 𝜑 occurs, then (at least) one of the two, 𝜑 or 𝜓, takes place (no matter what 𝜓 might be). Identical to pm2.24 124. Proposition 36 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege37 44077	If 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the occurrence of 𝜓 or 𝜑, then 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of 𝜑 alone. Similar to a closed form of orcs 875. Proposition 37 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege38 44078	Identical to pm2.21 123. Proposition 38 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege39 44079	Syllogism between pm2.18 128 and pm2.24 124. Proposition 39 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege40 44080	Anything implies pm2.18 128. Proposition 40 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axfrege41 44081	Identical to notnot 142. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege41 44082	The affirmation of 𝜑 denies the denial of 𝜑. Identical to notnot 142. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege42 44083	Not not id 22. Proposition 42 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege43 44084	If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 128. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege44 44085	Similar to a commuted pm2.62 899. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege45 44086	Deduce pm2.6 191 from con1 146. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege46 44087	If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurrences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 191. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege47 44088	Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege48 44089	Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurrence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 44201. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege49 44090	Closed form of deduction with disjunction. Proposition 49 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege50 44091	Closed form of jaoi 857. Proposition 50 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege51 44092	Compare with jaod 859. Proposition 51 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜒))))
21.36.6.5  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with logical equivalence Here we leverage df-ifp 1063 to partition a wff into two that are disjoint with the selector wff. Thus if we are given ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) then we replace the concept (illegal in our notation ) (𝜑‘𝜓) with if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) to reason about the values of the "function." Likewise, we replace the similarly illegal concept ∀𝜓𝜑 with (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃).
Theorem	axfrege52a 44093	Justification for ax-frege52a 44094. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Axiom	ax-frege52a 44094	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed (in this specific case the identity logical function) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege52aid 44095	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 215. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53aid 44096	Specialization of frege53a 44097. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53a 44097	Lemma for frege55a 44105. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	axfrege54a 44098	Justification for ax-frege54a 44099. Identical to biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege54a 44099	Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege54cor0a 44100	Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))