| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 441 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30905) |
(30906-32428) |
(32429-49911) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | frege58bcor 44001 | Lemma for frege59b 44002. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | frege59b 44002 |
A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition
59 of [Frege1879] p. 51.
Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 43911 incorrectly referenced where frege30 43930 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | frege60b 44003 | Swap antecedents of ax-frege58b 43999. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege61b 44004 | Lemma for frege65b 44008. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | frege62b 44005 | A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2658 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | frege63b 44006 | Lemma for frege91 44052. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege64b 44007 | Lemma for frege65b 44008. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) → (∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege65b 44008 |
A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of
inference barbara 2658 when the minor premise has a general context.
Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53.
In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege66b 44009 | Swap antecedents of frege65b 44008. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | frege67b 44010 | Lemma for frege68b 44011. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | frege68b 44011 | Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Begriffsschrift Chapter II with equivalence of classes (where they are sets). | ||
| Theorem | frege53c 44012 | Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | frege54cor1c 44013* | Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Revised by RP, 25-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | frege55lem1c 44014* | Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | frege55lem2c 44015* | Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝐴 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | frege55c 44016 | Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | frege56c 44017* | Lemma for frege57c 44018. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | frege57c 44018* | Swap order of implication in ax-frege52c 43986. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | frege58c 44019 | Principle related to sp 2186. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | frege59c 44020 |
A kind of Aristotelian inference. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51.
Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 43911 incorrectly referenced where frege30 43930 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | frege60c 44021 | Swap antecedents of frege58c 44019. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege61c 44022 | Lemma for frege65c 44026. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | frege62c 44023 | A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2658 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | frege63c 44024 | Analogue of frege63b 44006. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege64c 44025 | Lemma for frege65c 44026. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege65c 44026 | A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2658 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | frege66c 44027 | Swap antecedents of frege65c 44026. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | frege67c 44028 | Lemma for frege68c 44029. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | frege68c 44029 | Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
(𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 means membership in 𝐴 is hereditary in the sequence dictated by relation 𝑅. This differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on. While the above notation is modern, it is cumbersome in the case when 𝐴 is complex and to more closely follow Frege, we abbreviate it with new notation 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴. This greatly shortens the statements for frege97 44058 and frege109 44070. dffrege69 44030 through frege75 44036 develop this, but translation to Metamath is pending some decisions. While Frege does not limit discussion to sets, we may have to depart from Frege by limiting 𝑅 or 𝐴 to sets when we quantify over all hereditary relations or all classes where membership is hereditary in a sequence dictated by 𝑅. | ||
| Theorem | dffrege69 44030* | If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴 it can be inferred generally, whatever 𝑥 may be, that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then we say " Property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 69 of [Frege1879] p. 55. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | frege70 44031* | Lemma for frege72 44033. Proposition 70 of [Frege1879] p. 58. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑋𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege71 44032* | Lemma for frege72 44033. Proposition 71 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege72 44033 | If property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, if 𝑥 has property 𝐴, and if 𝑦 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥, then 𝑦 has property 𝐴. Proposition 72 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege73 44034 | Lemma for frege87 44048. Proposition 73 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege74 44035 | If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, then every result of a application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴. Proposition 74 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege75 44036* | If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴, whatever 𝑥 may be, it can be inferred that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 75 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴) | ||
𝑝(t+‘𝑅)𝑐 means 𝑐 follows 𝑝 in the 𝑅-sequence. dffrege76 44037 through frege98 44059 develop this. This will be shown to be the transitive closure of the relation 𝑅. But more work needs to be done on transitive closure of relations before this is ready for Metamath. | ||
| Theorem | dffrege76 44037* |
If from the two propositions that every result of an application of
the procedure 𝑅 to 𝐵 has property 𝑓 and
that property
𝑓 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, it can be inferred,
whatever 𝑓 may be, that 𝐸 has property 𝑓, then
we say
𝐸 follows 𝐵 in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 76 of
[Frege1879] p. 60.
Each of 𝐵, 𝐸 and 𝑅 must be sets. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑎(𝐵𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑓)) ↔ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | frege77 44038* | If 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, if property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, and if every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege78 44039* | Commuted form of frege77 44038. Proposition 78 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege79 44040* | Distributed form of frege78 44039. Proposition 79 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege80 44041* | Add additional condition to both clauses of frege79 44040. Proposition 80 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege81 44042 | If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅 -sequence, and if 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. This is a form of induction attributed to Jakob Bernoulli. Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege82 44043 | Closed-form deduction based on frege81 44042. Proposition 82 of [Frege1879] p. 64. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝜑 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege83 44044 | Apply commuted form of frege81 44042 when the property 𝑅 is hereditary in a disjunction of two properties, only one of which is known to be held by 𝑋. Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Here we introduce the union of classes where Frege has a disjunction of properties which are represented by membership in either of the classes. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑇 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege84 44045 | Commuted form of frege81 44042. Proposition 84 of [Frege1879] p. 65. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege85 44046* | Commuted form of frege77 44038. Proposition 85 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege86 44047* | Conclusion about element one past 𝑌 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 86 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴))))) | ||
| Theorem | frege87 44048* | If 𝑍 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to an object 𝑌 that follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence and if every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑍 has property 𝐴. Proposition 87 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege88 44049* | Commuted form of frege87 44048. Proposition 88 of [Frege1879] p. 67. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege89 44050* | One direction of dffrege76 44037. Proposition 89 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓)) → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | frege90 44051* | Add antecedent to frege89 44050. Proposition 90 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓))) → (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | frege91 44052 | Every result of an application of a procedure 𝑅 to an object 𝑋 follows that 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 91 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | frege92 44053 | Inference from frege91 44052. Proposition 92 of [Frege1879] p. 69. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑍 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | frege93 44054* | Necessary condition for two elements to be related by the transitive closure. Proposition 93 of [Frege1879] p. 70. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓(∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑓) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓)) → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | frege94 44055* | Looking one past a pair related by transitive closure of a relation. Proposition 94 of [Frege1879] p. 70. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑌𝑅𝑍 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → ∀𝑓(∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑓) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑓)))) → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | frege95 44056 | Looking one past a pair related by transitive closure of a relation. Proposition 95 of [Frege1879] p. 70. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | frege96 44057 | Every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to an object that follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅 -sequence. Proposition 96 of [Frege1879] p. 71. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | frege97 44058 |
The property of following 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence is hereditary
in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 97 of [Frege1879] p. 71.
Here we introduce the image of a singleton under a relation as class which stands for the property of following 𝑋 in the 𝑅 -sequence. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 hereditary ((t+‘𝑅) “ {𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | frege98 44059 | If 𝑌 follows 𝑋 and 𝑍 follows 𝑌 in the 𝑅-sequence then 𝑍 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence because the transitive closure of a relation has the transitive property. Proposition 98 of [Frege1879] p. 71. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 6-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍)) | ||
𝑝((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑐 means 𝑐 is a member of the 𝑅 -sequence beginning with 𝑝 and 𝑝 is a member of the 𝑅 -sequence ending with 𝑐. dffrege99 44060 through frege114 44075 develop this. This will be shown to be related to the transitive-reflexive closure of relation 𝑅. But more work needs to be done on transitive closure of relations before this is ready for Metamath. | ||
| Theorem | dffrege99 44060 | If 𝑍 is identical with 𝑋 or follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅 -sequence, then we say : "𝑍 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋 " or "𝑋 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence ending with 𝑍". Definition 99 of [Frege1879] p. 71. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ ((¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | frege100 44061 | One direction of dffrege99 44060. Proposition 100 of [Frege1879] p. 72. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | frege101 44062 | Lemma for frege102 44063. Proposition 101 of [Frege1879] p. 72. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → (𝑍𝑅𝑉 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑉)) → ((𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → (𝑍𝑅𝑉 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑉)) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (𝑍𝑅𝑉 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑉)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege102 44063 | If 𝑍 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑍 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 102 of [Frege1879] p. 72. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (𝑍𝑅𝑉 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | frege103 44064 | Proposition 103 of [Frege1879] p. 73. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋 = 𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | frege104 44065 |
Proposition 104 of [Frege1879] p. 73.
Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the minor clause and result swapped. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋 = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | frege105 44066 | Proposition 105 of [Frege1879] p. 73. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋) → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | frege106 44067 | Whatever follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence belongs to the 𝑅 -sequence beginning with 𝑋. Proposition 106 of [Frege1879] p. 73. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | frege107 44068 | Proposition 107 of [Frege1879] p. 74. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑉 → 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑉)) → (𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑉 → 𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | frege108 44069 | If 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑍, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑍. Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑉 → 𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | frege109 44070 | The property of belonging to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 109 of [Frege1879] p. 74. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 hereditary (((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I ) “ {𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | frege110 44071* | Proposition 110 of [Frege1879] p. 75. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑎) → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | frege111 44072 | If 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑍, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑍 or precedes 𝑍 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 111 of [Frege1879] p. 75. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑉 → (¬ 𝑉(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | frege112 44073 | Identity implies belonging to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with self. Proposition 112 of [Frege1879] p. 76. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍 = 𝑋 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | frege113 44074 | Proposition 113 of [Frege1879] p. 76. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋 → (¬ 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑋 → 𝑍 = 𝑋)) → (𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋 → (¬ 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑋 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | frege114 44075 | If 𝑋 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑍, then 𝑍 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋 or 𝑋 follows 𝑍 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 114 of [Frege1879] p. 76. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋 → (¬ 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑋 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍)) | ||
Fun ◡◡𝑅 means the relationship content of procedure 𝑅 is single-valued. The double converse allows to simply apply this syntax in place of Frege's even though the original never explicitly limited discussion of propositional statements which vary on two variables to relations. dffrege115 44076 through frege133 44094 develop this and how functions relate to transitive and transitive-reflexive closures. | ||
| Theorem | dffrege115 44076* | If from the circumstance that 𝑐 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑏, whatever 𝑏 may be, it can be inferred that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑏 is the same as 𝑐, then we say : "The procedure 𝑅 is single-valued". Definition 115 of [Frege1879] p. 77. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑐∀𝑏(𝑏𝑅𝑐 → ∀𝑎(𝑏𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑐)) ↔ Fun ◡◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | frege116 44077* | One direction of dffrege115 44076. Proposition 116 of [Frege1879] p. 77. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → ∀𝑏(𝑏𝑅𝑋 → ∀𝑎(𝑏𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | frege117 44078* | Lemma for frege118 44079. Proposition 117 of [Frege1879] p. 78. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑏(𝑏𝑅𝑋 → ∀𝑎(𝑏𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋)) → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → ∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋))) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → ∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege118 44079* | Simplified application of one direction of dffrege115 44076. Proposition 118 of [Frege1879] p. 78. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → ∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | frege119 44080* | Lemma for frege120 44081. Proposition 119 of [Frege1879] p. 78. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 = 𝑋) → (𝑌𝑅𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑋)) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌𝑅𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege120 44081 | Simplified application of one direction of dffrege115 44076. Proposition 120 of [Frege1879] p. 78. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌𝑅𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | frege121 44082 | Lemma for frege122 44083. Proposition 121 of [Frege1879] p. 79. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝑋 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝐴) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌𝑅𝐴 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege122 44083 | If 𝑋 is a result of an application of the single-valued procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋. Proposition 122 of [Frege1879] p. 79. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌𝑅𝐴 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | frege123 44084* | Lemma for frege124 44085. Proposition 123 of [Frege1879] p. 79. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑎(𝑌𝑅𝑎 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑎) → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑀)) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege124 44085 | If 𝑋 is a result of an application of the single-valued procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 and if 𝑀 follows 𝑌 in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑀 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑋. Proposition 124 of [Frege1879] p. 80. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | frege125 44086 | Lemma for frege126 44087. Proposition 125 of [Frege1879] p. 81. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑀 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋)) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋))))) | ||
| Theorem | frege126 44087 | If 𝑀 follows 𝑌 in the 𝑅-sequence and if the procedure 𝑅 is single-valued, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑀 or precedes 𝑀 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 126 of [Frege1879] p. 81. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege127 44088 | Communte antecedents of frege126 44087. Proposition 127 of [Frege1879] p. 82. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege128 44089 | Lemma for frege129 44090. Proposition 128 of [Frege1879] p. 83. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌 → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋))) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → ((¬ 𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌) → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋))))) | ||
| Theorem | frege129 44090 | If the procedure 𝑅 is single-valued and 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅 -sequence beginning with 𝑀 or precedes 𝑀 in the 𝑅-sequence, then every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑀 or precedes 𝑀 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 129 of [Frege1879] p. 83. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → ((¬ 𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌) → (𝑌𝑅𝑋 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | frege130 44091* | Lemma for frege131 44092. Proposition 130 of [Frege1879] p. 84. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑏((¬ 𝑏(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑏) → ∀𝑎(𝑏𝑅𝑎 → (¬ 𝑎(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑎))) → 𝑅 hereditary ((◡(t+‘𝑅) “ {𝑀}) ∪ (((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I ) “ {𝑀}))) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → 𝑅 hereditary ((◡(t+‘𝑅) “ {𝑀}) ∪ (((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I ) “ {𝑀})))) | ||
| Theorem | frege131 44092 | If the procedure 𝑅 is single-valued, then the property of belonging to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑀 or preceeding 𝑀 in the 𝑅-sequence is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 131 of [Frege1879] p. 85. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → 𝑅 hereditary ((◡(t+‘𝑅) “ {𝑀}) ∪ (((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I ) “ {𝑀}))) | ||
| Theorem | frege132 44093 | Lemma for frege133 44094. Proposition 132 of [Frege1879] p. 86. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary ((◡(t+‘𝑅) “ {𝑀}) ∪ (((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I ) “ {𝑀})) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (¬ 𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌)))) → (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (¬ 𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌))))) | ||
| Theorem | frege133 44094 | If the procedure 𝑅 is single-valued and if 𝑀 and 𝑌 follow 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑌 belongs to the 𝑅-sequence beginning with 𝑀 or precedes 𝑀 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 133 of [Frege1879] p. 86. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 & ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝑅 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (¬ 𝑌(t+‘𝑅)𝑀 → 𝑀((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑌)))) | ||
See Seifert and Threlfall: A Textbook Of Topology (1980) which is an English translation of Lehrbuch der Topologie (1934). | ||
Because ((2o ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ≈ ((2o ↑m 𝐴) ↑m 𝐵) is an instance of the law of exponents: ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐴) ≈ (𝐶 ↑m (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ↑m 𝐵) we are led to see that (𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ≈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) is true for any two sets, 𝐴 and 𝐵, and thus there exist one-to-one onto relations between each of these three sets of relations. | ||
| Theorem | enrelmap 44095 | The set of all possible relations between two sets is equinumerous to the set of all mappings from one set to the powerset of the other. See rfovf1od 44104 for a demonstration of a natural one-to-one onto mapping. (Contributed by RP, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | enrelmapr 44096 | The set of all possible relations between two sets is equinumerous to the set of all mappings from one set to the powerset of the other. (Contributed by RP, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | enmappw 44097 | The set of all mappings from one set to the powerset of the other is equinumerous to the set of all mappings from the second set to the powerset of the first. (Contributed by RP, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | enmappwid 44098 | The set of all mappings from the powerset to the powerset is equinumerous to the set of all mappings from the set to the powerset of the powerset. (Contributed by RP, 27-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝒫 𝐴 ↑m 𝒫 𝐴) ≈ (𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | rfovd 44099* | Value of the operator, (𝐴𝑂𝐵), which maps between relations and functions for relations between base sets, 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∣ 𝑥𝑟𝑦}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥𝑟𝑦}))) | ||
| Theorem | rfovfvd 44100* | Value of the operator, (𝐴𝑂𝐵), which maps between relations and functions for relations between base sets, 𝐴 and 𝐵, and relation 𝑅. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∣ 𝑥𝑟𝑦}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |