P. 448 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44701-44800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	limsupref 44701*	If a sequence is bounded, then the limsup is real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑗)) ≤ 𝑏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	limsupbnd1f 44702*	If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	climbddf 44703*	A converging sequence of complex numbers is bounded. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	climeqf 44704*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐺    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	climeldmeqmpt3 44705*	Two functions that are eventually equal, either both are convergent or both are divergent. TODO: this is more general than climeldmeqmpt 44684 and should replace it. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	limsupcld 44706	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	climfv 44707	The limit of a convergent sequence, expressed as the function value of the convergence relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = ( ⇝ ‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupval3 44708*	The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climfveqmpt2 44709*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ⇝ ‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = ( ⇝ ‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	limsup0 44710	The superior limit of the empty set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (lim sup‘∅) = -∞
Theorem	climeldmeqmpt2 44711*	Two functions that are eventually equal, either both are convergent or both are divergent. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	limsupresre 44712	The supremum limit of a function only depends on the real part of its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ ℝ)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	climeqmpt 44713*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝ 𝐷))
Theorem	climfvd 44714	The limit of a convergent sequence, expressed as the function value of the convergence relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ( ⇝ ‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsuplesup 44715	An upper bound for the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐾[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresico 44716	The superior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsuppnfdlem 44717*	If the restriction of a function to every upper interval is unbounded above, its lim sup is +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = +∞)
Theorem	limsuppnfd 44718*	If the restriction of a function to every upper interval is unbounded above, its lim sup is +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = +∞)
Theorem	limsupresuz 44719	If the real part of the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the superior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ↾ ℝ) ⊆ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupub 44720*	If the limsup is not +∞, then the function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	limsupres 44721	The superior limit of a restriction is less than or equal to the original superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐶)) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	climinf2lem 44722*	A convergent, nonincreasing sequence, converges to the infimum of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ inf(ran 𝐹, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climinf2 44723*	A convergent, nonincreasing sequence, converges to the infimum of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ inf(ran 𝐹, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupvaluz 44724*	The superior limit, when the domain of the function is a set of upper integers (the first condition is needed, otherwise the l.h.s. would be -∞ and the r.h.s. would be +∞). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresuz2 44725	If the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the superior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsuppnflem 44726*	If the restriction of a function to every upper interval is unbounded above, its lim sup is +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = +∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))))
Theorem	limsuppnf 44727*	If the restriction of a function to every upper interval is unbounded above, its lim sup is +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = +∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))))
Theorem	limsupubuzlem 44728*	If the limsup is not +∞, then the function is bounded. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝑋    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐾 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if((⌈‘𝐾) ≤ 𝑀, 𝑀, (⌈‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = sup(ran (𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ (𝐹‘𝑗)), ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(𝑊 ≤ 𝑌, 𝑌, 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	limsupubuz 44729*	For a real-valued function on a set of upper integers, if the superior limit is not +∞, then the function is bounded above. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	climinf2mpt 44730*	A bounded below, monotonic nonincreasing sequence converges to the infimum of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climinfmpt 44731*	A bounded below, monotonic nonincreasing sequence converges to the infimum of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climinf3 44732*	A convergent, nonincreasing sequence, converges to the infimum of its range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ inf(ran 𝐹, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupvaluzmpt 44733*	The superior limit, when the domain of the function is a set of upper integers (the first condition is needed, otherwise the l.h.s. would be -∞ and the r.h.s. would be +∞). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘) ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupequzmpt2 44734*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	limsupubuzmpt 44735*	If the limsup is not +∞, then the function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ≠ +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	limsupmnflem 44736*	The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to an upper interval of real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	limsupmnf 44737*	The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to an upper interval of real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	limsupequzlem 44738*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐺))
Theorem	limsupequz 44739*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐺    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐺))
Theorem	limsupre2lem 44740*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	limsupre2 44741*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	limsupmnfuzlem 44742*	The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	limsupmnfuz 44743*	The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))
Theorem	limsupequzmptlem 44744*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = if(𝑀 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	limsupequzmpt 44745*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	limsupre2mpt 44746*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 < 𝑦))))
Theorem	limsupequzmptf 44747*	Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	limsupre3lem 44748*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))))
Theorem	limsupre3 44749*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))))
Theorem	limsupre3mpt 44750*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑦))))
Theorem	limsupre3uzlem 44751*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	limsupre3uz 44752*	Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	limsupreuz 44753*	Given a function on the reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	limsupvaluz2 44754*	The superior limit, when the domain of a real-valued function is a set of upper integers, and the superior limit is real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ, < ))
Theorem	limsupreuzmpt 44755*	Given a function on the reals, defined on a set of upper integers, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	supcnvlimsup 44756*	If a function on a set of upper integers has a real superior limit, the supremum of the rightmost parts of the function, converges to that superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )) ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	supcnvlimsupmpt 44757*	If a function on a set of upper integers has a real superior limit, the supremum of the rightmost parts of the function, converges to that superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘) ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < )) ⇝ (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)))
Theorem	0cnv 44758	If ∅ is a complex number, then it converges to itself. See 0ncn 11131 and its comment; see also the comment in climlimsupcex 44785. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (∅ ∈ ℂ → ∅ ⇝ ∅)
Theorem	climuzlem 44759*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climuz 44760*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	lmbr3v 44761*	Express the binary relation "sequence 𝐹 converges to point 𝑃 " in a metric space using an arbitrary upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 ↑pm ℂ) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑢)))))
Theorem	climisp 44762*	If a sequence converges to an isolated point (w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers) then the sequence eventually becomes that point. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmbr3 44763*	Express the binary relation "sequence 𝐹 converges to point 𝑃 " in a metric space using an arbitrary upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 ↑pm ℂ) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑢)))))
Theorem	climrescn 44764*	A sequence converging w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, eventually becomes a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℂ)
Theorem	climxrrelem 44765*	If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ +∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(+∞ − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(-∞ − 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	climxrre 44766*	If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued (the weaker hypothesis 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ is probably not enough, since in principle we could have +∞ ∈ ℂ and -∞ ∈ ℂ). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ)
21.40.7.1  Inferior limit (lim inf)
Syntax	clsi 44767	Extend class notation to include the liminf function. (actually, it makes sense for any extended real function defined on a subset of RR which is not upper-bounded)
class lim inf
Definition	df-liminf 44768*	Define the inferior limit of a sequence of extended real numbers. (Contributed by GS, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ lim inf = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ sup(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsuplt2 44769*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) < 𝐴))
Theorem	liminfgord 44770	Ordering property of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupvald 44771*	The superior limit of a sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers is the infimum of the set of suprema of all restrictions of 𝐹 to an upperset of reals . (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresicompt 44772*	The superior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵)))
Theorem	limsupcli 44773	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*
Theorem	liminfgf 44774	Closure of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	liminfval 44775*	The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climlimsup 44776	A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it converges to its superior limit. The first hypothesis is needed (see climlimsupcex 44785 for a counterexample). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	limsupge 44777*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )))
Theorem	liminfgval 44778*	Value of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	liminfcl 44779	Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	liminfvald 44780*	The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	liminfval5 44781*	The inferior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupresxr 44782	The superior limit of a function only depends on the restriction of that function to the preimage of the set of extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresxr 44783	The inferior limit of a function only depends on the preimage of the extended real part. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfval2 44784*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	climlimsupcex 44785	Counterexample for climlimsup 44776, showing that the first hypothesis is needed, if the empty set is a complex number (see 0ncn 11131 and its comment). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ¬ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ ((∅ ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → (𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ¬ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminfcld 44786	Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	liminfresico 44787	The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to an upperset of reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsup10exlem 44788*	The range of the given function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ (𝐾[,)+∞)) = {0, 1})
Theorem	limsup10ex 44789	The superior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) = 1
Theorem	liminf10ex 44790	The inferior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) = 0
Theorem	liminflelimsuplem 44791*	The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminflelimsup 44792*	The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. The second hypothesis is needed (see liminflelimsupcex 44813 for a counterexample). The inequality can be strict, see liminfltlimsupex 44797. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupgtlem 44793*	For any positive real, the superior limit of F is larger than any of its values at large enough arguments, up to that positive real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	limsupgt 44794*	Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's appxoximated from below by the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresre 44795	The inferior limit of a function only depends on the real part of its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ ℝ)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))
Theorem	liminfresicompt 44796*	The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)))
Theorem	liminfltlimsupex 44797	An example where the lim inf is strictly smaller than the lim sup. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) < (lim sup‘𝐹)
Theorem	liminfgelimsup 44798*	The inferior limit is greater than or equal to the superior limit if and only if they are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹) ↔ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)))
Theorem	liminfvalxr 44799*	Alternate definition of lim inf when 𝐹 is an extended real-valued function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒(𝐹‘𝑥))))
Theorem	liminfresuz 44800	If the real part of the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the inferior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ↾ ℝ) ⊆ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹))