| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 116 of 513) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31550) |
(31551-33073) |
(33074-51270) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dedekindle 11501* | The Dedekind cut theorem, with the hypothesis weakened to only require non-strict less than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12 11502 | Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32 11503 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31 11504 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul4 11505 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | mul4r 11506 | Rearrangement of 4 factors: swap the right factors in the factors of a product of two products. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐷) · (𝐶 · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | muladd11 11507 | A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | 1p1times 11508 | Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | peano2cn 11509 | A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12374. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | peano2re 11510 | A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12374. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | readdcan 11511 | Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | 00id 11512 | 0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem1 11513 | Lemma for mul02 11515. If any real does not produce 0 when multiplied by 0, then any complex is equal to double itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (0 · 𝐴) ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 = (𝐵 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul02lem2 11514 | Lemma for mul02 11515. Zero times a real is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul02 11515 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul01 11516 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addrid 11517 | 0 is an additive identity. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex 11518* | Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | cnegex2 11519* | Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addlid 11520 | 0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcan 11521 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2 11522 | Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addcom 11523 | Addition is commutative. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | addridi 11524 | 0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | addlidi 11525 | 0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | mul02i 11526 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (0 · 𝐴) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | mul01i 11527 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | addcomi 11528 | Addition is commutative. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcomli 11529 | Addition is commutative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | addcani 11530 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2i 11531 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mul12i 11532 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mul32i 11533 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mul4i 11534 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | mul02d 11535 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | mul01d 11536 | Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | addridd 11537 | 0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addlidd 11538 | 0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcomd 11539 | Addition is commutative. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | addcand 11540 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2d 11541 | Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addcanad 11542 | Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcand 11540. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | addcan2ad 11543 | Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcan2d 11541. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | addneintrd 11544 | Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 11542. Consequence of addcand 11540. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | addneintr2d 11545 | Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 11543. Consequence of addcan2d 11541. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mul12d 11546 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | mul32d 11547 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mul31d 11548 | Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mul4d 11549 | Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | muladd11r 11550 | A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1)) | ||
| Theorem | comraddd 11551 | Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | comraddi 11552 | Commute RHS addition. See addcomli 11529 to commute addition on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddneg 11553 | Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐴) < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltaddnegr 11554 | Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add12 11555 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | add32 11556 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add32r 11557 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add4 11558 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | add42 11559 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | add12i 11560 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | add32i 11561 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | add4i 11562 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | add42i 11563 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add12d 11564 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | add32d 11565 | Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | add4d 11566 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | add42d 11567 | Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))) | ||
| Syntax | cmin 11568 | Extend class notation to include subtraction. |
| class − | ||
| Syntax | cneg 11569 | Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction cmin 11568 (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 7443, if we used the same symbol then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either "− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes "− " and "− 𝐵 " connected with "operation" "𝐴". On the other hand, "( -𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous. |
| class -𝐴 | ||
| Definition | df-sub 11570* | Define subtraction. Theorem subval 11575 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 11672 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 11661 and resubcli 11647 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Definition | df-neg 11571 | Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 11569 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 0cnALT 11572 | Alternate proof of 0cn 11325 which does not reference ax-1cn 11285. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | 0cnALT2 11573 | Alternate proof of 0cnALT 11572 which is shorter, but depends on ax-8 2149, ax-13 2404, ax-sep 5252, ax-nul 5263, ax-pow 5331, ax-pr 5395, ax-un 7775, and every complex number axiom except ax-pre-mulgt0 11304 and ax-pre-sup 11305. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | negeu 11574* | Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | subval 11575* | Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element 𝑥 such that 𝐵 + 𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | negeq 11576 | Equality theorem for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | negeqi 11577 | Equality inference for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ -𝐴 = -𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | negeqd 11578 | Equality deduction for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 = -𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfnegd 11579 | Deduction version of nfneg 11580. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 -𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nfneg 11580 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 -𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | csbnegg 11581 | Move class substitution in and out of the negative of a number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ -𝐵 = -⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | negex 11582 | A negative is a set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ -𝐴 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | subcl 11583 | Closure law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | negcl 11584 | Closure law for negative. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → -𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | negicn 11585 | -i is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ -i ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | subf 11586 | Subtraction is an operation on the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ − :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
| Theorem | subadd 11587 | Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | subadd2 11588 | Relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐵) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | subsub23 11589 | Swap subtrahend and result of subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pncan 11590 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pncan2 11591 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pncan3 11592 | Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2005.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐴)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | npcan 11593 | Cancellation law for subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addsubass 11594 | Associative-type law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | addsub 11595 | Law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2001.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) = ((𝐴 − 𝐶) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | subadd23 11596 | Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐶 − 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | addsub12 11597 | Commutative/associative law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 − 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 − 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | 2addsub 11598 | Law for subtraction and addition. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) − 𝐷) = (((𝐴 + 𝐶) − 𝐷) + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addsubeq4 11599 | Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | pncan3oi 11600 | Subtraction and addition of equals. Almost but not exactly the same as pncan3i 11662 and pncan 11590, this order happens often when applying "operations to both sides" so create a theorem specifically for it. A deduction version of this is available as pncand 11697. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐵) = 𝐴 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |