Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 261 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28689) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28690-30212) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30213-44900) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | 2sqblem 26001 | Lemma for 2sqb 26002. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 gcd 𝑌) = ((𝑃 · 𝐴) + (𝑌 · 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) | ||
Theorem | 2sqb 26002* | The converse to 2sq 26000. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ↔ (𝑃 = 2 ∨ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1))) | ||
Theorem | 2sq2 26003 | 2 is the sum of squares of two nonnegative integers iff the two integers are 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 2 ↔ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 1))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqn0 26004 | If the sum of two squares is prime, none of the original number is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | 2sqcoprm 26005 | If the sum of two squares is prime, the two original numbers are coprime. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) | ||
Theorem | 2sqmod 26006 | Given two decompositions of a prime as a sum of two squares, show that they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqmo 26007* | There exists at most one decomposition of a prime as a sum of two squares. See 2sqb 26002 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃*𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqnn0 26008* | All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqnn 26009* | All primes of the form 4𝑘 + 1 are sums of squares of two positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2))) | ||
Theorem | addsq2reu 26010* |
For each complex number 𝐶, there exists a unique complex
number
𝑎 added to the square of a unique
another complex number 𝑏
resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. The unique complex number
𝑎 is 𝐶, and the unique another complex
number 𝑏 is 0.
Remark: This, together with addsqnreup 26013, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑). See also comments for df-eu 2650 and 2eu4 2737. For more details see comment for addsqnreup 26013. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | addsqn2reu 26011* |
For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique
complex
number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique
another complex number
𝑎 resulting in the given complex number
𝐶.
Actually, for each
complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique.
Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 26010, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | addsqrexnreu 26012* |
For each complex number, there exists a complex number to which the
square of more than one (or no) other complex numbers can be added to
result in the given complex number.
Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 26010, shows that there are cases in which there is a set together with a not unique other set fulfilling a wff, although there is a unique set fulfilling the wff together with another unique set (see addsq2reu 26010). For more details see comment for addsqnreup 26013. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | addsqnreup 26013* |
There is no unique decomposition of a complex number as a sum of a
complex number and a square of a complex number.
Remark: This theorem, together with addsq2reu 26010, is a real life example (about a numerical property) showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑"). See also comments for df-eu 2650 and 2eu4 2737. In the case of decompositions of complex numbers as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, the only/unique complex number to which the square of a unique complex number is added yields in the given complex number is the given number itself, and the unique complex number to be squared is 0 (see comment for addsq2reu 26010). There are, however, complex numbers to which the square of more than one other complex numbers can be added to yield the given complex number (see addsqrexnreu 26012). For example, 〈1, (√‘(𝐶 − 1))〉 and 〈1, -(√‘(𝐶 − 1))〉 are two different decompositions of 𝐶 (if 𝐶 ≠ 1). Therefore, there is no unique decomposition of any complex number as a sum of a complex number and a square of a complex number, as generally proved by this theorem. As a consequence, a theorem must claim the existence of a unique pair of sets to express "There are unique 𝑎 and 𝑏 so that .." (more formally ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 with 𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉), or by showing (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑) (see 2reu4 4465 resp. 2eu4 2737). These two representations are equivalent (see opreu2reurex 6139). An analogon of this theorem using the latter variant is given in addsqn2reurex2 26015. In some cases, however, the variant with (ordered!) pairs may be possible only for ordered sets (like ℝ or ℙ) and claiming that the first component is less than or equal to the second component (see, for example, 2sqreunnltb 26031 and 2sqreuopb 26038). Alternatively, (proper) unordered pairs can be used: ∃!𝑝𝑒𝒫 𝐴((♯‘𝑝) = 2 ∧ 𝜑), or, using the definition of proper pairs: ∃!𝑝 ∈ (Pairsproper‘𝐴)𝜑 (see, for example, inlinecirc02preu 44769). (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ)((1st ‘𝑝) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | addsq2nreurex 26014* | For each complex number 𝐶, there is no unique complex number 𝑎 added to the square of another complex number 𝑏 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | addsqn2reurex2 26015* |
For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two
complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared
and added to 𝑎
resulting in the given complex number 𝐶.
Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 26010, is an example showing that the pattern ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 does not necessarily mean "There are unique sets 𝑎 and 𝑏 fulfilling 𝜑), as it is the case with the pattern (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. See also comments for df-eu 2650 and 2eu4 2737. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreulem1 26016* | Lemma 1 for 2sqreu 26026. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreultlem 26017* | Lemma for 2sqreult 26028. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreultblem 26018* | Lemma for 2sqreultb 26029. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnlem1 26019* | Lemma 1 for 2sqreunn 26027. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnltlem 26020* | Lemma for 2sqreunnlt 26030. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnltblem 26021* | Lemma for 2sqreunnltb 26031. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 18-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreulem2 26022 | Lemma 2 for 2sqreu 26026 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreulem3 26023 | Lemma 3 for 2sqreu 26026 etc. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)) → (((𝜑 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐶↑2)) = 𝑃)) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreulem4 26024* | Lemma 4 for 2sqreu 26026 et. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnlem2 26025* | Lemma 2 for 2sqreunn 26027. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃*𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | 2sqreu 26026* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. See 2sqnn0 26008 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunn 26027* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. See 2sqnn 26009 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreult 26028* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) (Proposed by GL, 8-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreultb 26029* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). (Contributed by AV, 10-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnlt 26030* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jun-2023.) Specialization to different integers, proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreunnltb 26031* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2023.) The prime needs not be odd, as observed by WL. (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuop 26032* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreu 26026. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuopnn 26033* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunn 26027. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) ≤ (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuoplt 26034* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreult 26028. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuopltb 26035* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different nonnegative integers iff 𝑃≡1 (mod 4). Ordered pair variant of 2sqreultb 26029. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℕ0)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuopnnlt 26036* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime of the form 4𝑘 + 1 as a sum of squares of two different positive integers. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnlt 26030. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 1) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuopnnltb 26037* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 26031. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)((1st ‘𝑝) < (2nd ‘𝑝) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑝)↑2) + ((2nd ‘𝑝)↑2)) = 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqreuopb 26038* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Alternate ordered pair variant of 2sqreunnltb 26031. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (ℕ × ℕ)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∧ (𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))) | ||
Theorem | chebbnd1lem1 26039 | Lemma for chebbnd1 26042: show a lower bound on π(𝑥) at even integers using similar techniques to those used to prove bpos 25863. (Note that the expression 𝐾 is actually equal to 2 · 𝑁, but proving that is not necessary for the proof, and it's too much work.) The key to the proof is bposlem1 25854, which shows that each term in the expansion ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁) = ∏𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝↑(𝑝 pCnt ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁))) is at most 2 · 𝑁, so that the sum really only has nonzero elements up to 2 · 𝑁, and since each term is at most 2 · 𝑁, after taking logs we get the inequality π(2 · 𝑁) · log(2 · 𝑁) ≤ log((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), and bclbnd 25850 finishes the proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐾 = if((2 · 𝑁) ≤ ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁), (2 · 𝑁), ((2 · 𝑁)C𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → (log‘((4↑𝑁) / 𝑁)) < ((π‘(2 · 𝑁)) · (log‘(2 · 𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | chebbnd1lem2 26040 | Lemma for chebbnd1 26042: Show that log(𝑁) / 𝑁 does not change too much between 𝑁 and 𝑀 = ⌊(𝑁 / 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → ((log‘(2 · 𝑀)) / (2 · 𝑀)) < (2 · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | chebbnd1lem3 26041 | Lemma for chebbnd1 26042: get a lower bound on π(𝑁) / (𝑁 / log(𝑁)) that is independent of 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (⌊‘(𝑁 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 8 ≤ 𝑁) → (((log‘2) − (1 / (2 · e))) / 2) < ((π‘𝑁) · ((log‘𝑁) / 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | chebbnd1 26042 | The Chebyshev bound: The function π(𝑥) is eventually lower bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) / π(𝑥) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)) / (π‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | chtppilimlem1 26043 | Lemma for chtppilim 26045. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (2[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁↑𝑐𝐴) / (π‘𝑁)) < (1 − 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑁) · (log‘𝑁))) < (θ‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | chtppilimlem2 26044* | Lemma for chtppilim 26045. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞)(𝑧 ≤ 𝑥 → ((𝐴↑2) · ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥))) < (θ‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | chtppilim 26045 | The θ function is asymptotic to π(𝑥)log(𝑥), so it is sufficient to prove θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / ((π‘𝑥) · (log‘𝑥)))) ⇝𝑟 1 | ||
Theorem | chto1ub 26046 | The θ function is upper bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chtub 25782. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((θ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | chebbnd2 26047 | The Chebyshev bound, part 2: The function π(𝑥) is eventually upper bounded by a positive constant times 𝑥 / log(𝑥). Alternatively stated, the function π(𝑥) / (𝑥 / log(𝑥)) is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((π‘𝑥) / (𝑥 / (log‘𝑥)))) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | chto1lb 26048 | The θ function is lower bounded by a linear term. Corollary of chebbnd1 26042. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ (𝑥 / (θ‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | chpchtlim 26049 | The ψ and θ functions are asymptotic to each other, so is sufficient to prove either θ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 or ψ(𝑥) / 𝑥 ⇝𝑟 1 to establish the PNT. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (2[,)+∞) ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / (θ‘𝑥))) ⇝𝑟 1 | ||
Theorem | chpo1ub 26050 | The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ ((ψ‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | chpo1ubb 26051* | The ψ function is upper bounded by a linear term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.) |
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | vmadivsum 26052* | The sum of the von Mangoldt function over 𝑛 is asymptotic to log𝑥 + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.2.13 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1) | ||
Theorem | vmadivsumb 26053* | Give a total bound on the von Mangoldt sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘(Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛) − (log‘𝑥))) ≤ 𝑐 | ||
Theorem | rplogsumlem1 26054* | Lemma for rplogsum 26097. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (2...𝐴)((log‘𝑛) / (𝑛 · (𝑛 − 1))) ≤ 2) | ||
Theorem | rplogsumlem2 26055* | Lemma for rplogsum 26097. Equation 9.2.14 of [Shapiro], p. 331. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...𝐴)(((Λ‘𝑛) − if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (log‘𝑛), 0)) / 𝑛) ≤ 2) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem1a 26056 | Lemma for dchrisum0lem1 26086. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑋))) → (𝑋 ≤ ((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷) ∧ (⌊‘((𝑋↑2) / 𝐷)) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(⌊‘𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | rpvmasumlem 26057* | Lemma for rpvmasum 26096. Calculate the "trivial case" estimate Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥( 1 (𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) = log𝑥 + 𝑂(1), where 1 (𝑥) is the principal Dirichlet character. Equation 9.4.7 of [Shapiro], p. 376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(( 1 ‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisumlema 26058* | Lemma for dchrisum 26062. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼 ∈ ℝ+ → ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐼 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞) → 0 ≤ ⦋𝐼 / 𝑛⦌𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisumlem1 26059* | Lemma for dchrisum 26062. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℕ0) → (abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑈)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | dchrisumlem2 26060* | Lemma for dchrisum 26062. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≤ (𝐼 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐽) − (seq1( + , 𝐹)‘𝐼))) ≤ ((2 · 𝑅) · ⦋𝑈 / 𝑛⦌𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisumlem3 26061* | Lemma for dchrisum 26062. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (0..^𝑢)(𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛))) ≤ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum 26062* | If 𝑛 ∈ [𝑀, +∞) ↦ 𝐴(𝑛) is a positive decreasing function approaching zero, then the infinite sum Σ𝑛, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) is convergent, with the partial sum Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥, 𝑋(𝑛)𝐴(𝑛) within 𝑂(𝐴(𝑀)) of the limit 𝑇. Lemma 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑥 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ 𝐴) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑥)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | dchrmusumlema 26063* | Lemma for dchrmusum 26094 and dchrisumn0 26091. Apply dchrisum 26062 for the function 1 / 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 / 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | dchrmusum2 26064* | The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded, provided that 𝑇 ≠ 0. Lemma 9.4.2 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · 𝑇)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumlem1 26065* | An alternative expression for a Dirichlet-weighted von Mangoldt sum in terms of the Möbius function. Equation 9.4.11 of [Shapiro], p. 377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚)))) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasum2lem 26066* | Give an expression for log𝑥 remarkably similar to Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥(𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛) given in dchrvmasumlem1 26065. Part of Lemma 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (log‘𝐴) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘((𝐴 / 𝑑) / 𝑚)) / 𝑚)))) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasum2if 26067* | Combine the results of dchrvmasumlem1 26065 and dchrvmasum2lem 26066 inside a conditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝜓, (log‘𝐴), 0)) = Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝐴 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) · ((log‘if(𝜓, (𝐴 / 𝑑), 𝑚)) / 𝑚)))) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumlem2 26068* | Lemma for dchrvmasum 26095. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((abs‘(𝐾 − 𝑇)) / 𝑑)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumlem3 26069* | Lemma for dchrvmasum 26095. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ+) → 𝐹 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝑚 = (𝑥 / 𝑑) → 𝐹 = 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (3[,)+∞)) → (abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 · ((log‘𝑚) / 𝑚))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ (1[,)3)(abs‘(𝐹 − 𝑇)) ≤ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (𝐾 − 𝑇))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumlema 26070* | Lemma for dchrvmasum 26095 and dchrvmasumif 26073. Apply dchrisum 26062 for the function log(𝑦) / 𝑦, which is decreasing above e (or above 3, the nearest integer bound). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumiflem1 26071* | Lemma for dchrvmasumif 26073. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑑)) · ((μ‘𝑑) / 𝑑)) · (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝑥 / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑘)) · ((log‘if(𝑆 = 0, (𝑥 / 𝑑), 𝑘)) / 𝑘)) − if(𝑆 = 0, 0, 𝑇)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumiflem2 26072* | Lemma for dchrvmasum 26095. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) · ((log‘𝑎) / 𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (3[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 · ((log‘𝑦) / 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumif 26073* | An asymptotic approximation for the sum of 𝑋(𝑛)Λ(𝑛) / 𝑛 conditional on the value of the infinite sum 𝑆. (We will later show that the case 𝑆 = 0 is impossible, and hence establish dchrvmasum 26095.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) + if(𝑆 = 0, (log‘𝑥), 0))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmaeq0 26074* | The set 𝑊 is the collection of all non-principal Dirichlet characters such that the sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is equal to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑆 = 0)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0fval 26075* | Value of the function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = Σ𝑡 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝐴} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑡))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0fmul 26076* | The function 𝐹, the divisor sum of a Dirichlet character, is a multiplicative function (but not completely multiplicative). Equation 9.4.27 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) · (𝐹‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0ff 26077* | The function 𝐹 is a real function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0flblem1 26078* | Lemma for dchrisum0flb 26080. Base case, prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘(𝑃↑𝐴)) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑃↑𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0flblem2 26079* | Lemma for dchrisum0flb 26080. Induction over relatively prime factors, with the prime power case handled in dchrisum0flblem1 . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) Replace reference to OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1..^𝐴)if((√‘𝑦) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0flb 26080* | The divisor sum of a real Dirichlet character, is lower bounded by zero everywhere and one at the squares. Equation 9.4.29 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → if((√‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ, 1, 0) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0fno1 26081* | The sum Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑥, 𝐹(𝑥) / √𝑘 is divergent (i.e. not eventually bounded). Equation 9.4.30 of [Shapiro], p. 383. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑣 ∈ {𝑞 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑞 ∥ 𝑏} (𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑣))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝐹‘𝑘) / (√‘𝑘))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | rpvmasum2 26082* | A partial result along the lines of rpvmasum 26096. The sum of the von Mangoldt function over those integers 𝑛≡𝐴 (mod 𝑁) is asymptotic to (1 − 𝑀)(log𝑥 / ϕ(𝑥)) + 𝑂(1), where 𝑀 is the number of non-principal Dirichlet characters with Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 0. Our goal is to show this set is empty. Equation 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴}) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 = (1r‘𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((ϕ‘𝑁) · Σ𝑛 ∈ ((1...(⌊‘𝑥)) ∩ 𝑇)((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − ((log‘𝑥) · (1 − (♯‘𝑊))))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0re 26083* | Suppose 𝑋 is a non-principal Dirichlet character with Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 0. Then 𝑋 is a real character. Part of Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:(Base‘𝑍)⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lema 26084* | Lemma for dchrisum0 26090. Apply dchrisum 26062 for the function 1 / √𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡∃𝑐 ∈ (0[,)+∞)(seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑡)) ≤ (𝑐 / (√‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem1b 26085* | Lemma for dchrisum0lem1 26086. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) ∧ 𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))) → (abs‘Σ𝑚 ∈ (((⌊‘𝑥) + 1)...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑑)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚))) ≤ ((2 · 𝐶) / (√‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem1 26086* | Lemma for dchrisum0 26090. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (((⌊‘𝑥) + 1)...(⌊‘(𝑥↑2)))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑑))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem2a 26087* | Lemma for dchrisum0 26090. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑦))(1 / (√‘𝑑)) − (2 · (√‘𝑦)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑟 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) · (𝐻‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem2 26088* | Lemma for dchrisum0 26090. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑦))(1 / (√‘𝑑)) − (2 · (√‘𝑦)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑟 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐾) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐾)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐸 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))(((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑚)) / (√‘𝑑))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0lem3 26089* | Lemma for dchrisum0 26090. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / (√‘𝑎))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑆)) ≤ (𝐶 / (√‘𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘(𝑥↑2)))Σ𝑑 ∈ (1...(⌊‘((𝑥↑2) / 𝑚)))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / (√‘(𝑚 · 𝑑)))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrisum0 26090* | The sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is nonzero for all non-principal Dirichlet characters (i.e. the assumption 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 is contradictory). This is the key result that allows us to eliminate the conditionals from dchrmusum2 26064 and dchrvmasumif 26073. Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ { 1 }) ∣ Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑦‘(𝐿‘𝑚)) / 𝑚) = 0} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | dchrisumn0 26091* | The sum Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ, 𝑋(𝑛) / 𝑛 is nonzero for all non-principal Dirichlet characters (i.e. the assumption 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 is contradictory). This is the key result that allows us to eliminate the conditionals from dchrmusum2 26064 and dchrvmasumif 26073. Lemma 9.4.4 of [Shapiro], p. 382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | dchrmusumlem 26092* | The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded. Equation 9.4.16 of [Shapiro], p. 379. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((μ‘𝑛) / 𝑛))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasumlem 26093* | The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded. Equation 9.4.16 of [Shapiro], p. 379. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑎)) / 𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (1[,)+∞)(abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐹)‘(⌊‘𝑦)) − 𝑇)) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrmusum 26094* | The sum of the Möbius function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded. Equation 9.4.16 of [Shapiro], p. 379. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((μ‘𝑛) / 𝑛))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dchrvmasum 26095* | The sum of the von Mangoldt function multiplied by a non-principal Dirichlet character, divided by 𝑛, is bounded. Equation 9.4.8 of [Shapiro], p. 376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (DChr‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 1 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 1 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((𝑋‘(𝐿‘𝑛)) · ((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | rpvmasum 26096* | The sum of the von Mangoldt function over those integers 𝑛≡𝐴 (mod 𝑁) is asymptotic to log𝑥 / ϕ(𝑥) + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((ϕ‘𝑁) · Σ𝑛 ∈ ((1...(⌊‘𝑥)) ∩ 𝑇)((Λ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | rplogsum 26097* | The sum of log𝑝 / 𝑝 over the primes 𝑝≡𝐴 (mod 𝑁) is asymptotic to log𝑥 / ϕ(𝑥) + 𝑂(1). Equation 9.4.3 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (((ϕ‘𝑁) · Σ𝑝 ∈ ((1...(⌊‘𝑥)) ∩ (ℙ ∩ 𝑇))((log‘𝑝) / 𝑝)) − (log‘𝑥))) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | dirith2 26098 | Dirichlet's theorem: there are infinitely many primes in any arithmetic progression coprime to 𝑁. Theorem 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡𝐿 “ {𝐴}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℙ ∩ 𝑇) ≈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | dirith 26099* | Dirichlet's theorem: there are infinitely many primes in any arithmetic progression coprime to 𝑁. Theorem 9.4.1 of [Shapiro], p. 375. See http://metamath-blog.blogspot.com/2016/05/dirichlets-theorem.html for an informal exposition. This is Metamath 100 proof #48. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1) → {𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑁 ∥ (𝑝 − 𝐴)} ≈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | mudivsum 26100* | Asymptotic formula for Σ𝑛 ≤ 𝑥, μ(𝑛) / 𝑛 = 𝑂(1). Equation 10.2.1 of [Shapiro], p. 405. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝑥))((μ‘𝑛) / 𝑛)) ∈ 𝑂(1) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |