P. 183 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18201-18300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
8.3.3  The category of extensible structures The "category of extensible structures" ExtStrCat is the category of all sets in a universe regarded as extensible structures and the functions between their base sets, see df-estrc 18204. Since we consider only "small categories" (i.e. categories whose objects and morphisms are actually sets and not proper classes), the objects of the category (i.e. the base set of the category regarded as extensible structure) are all sets in a universe 𝑢, which can be an arbitrary set, see estrcbas 18206. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 18202 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". The morphisms (or arrows) between two objects, i.e. sets from the universe, are the mappings between their base sets, see estrchomfval 18207, whereas the composition is the ordinary composition of functions, see estrccofval 18210 and estrcco 18211. It is shown that the category of extensible structures ExtStrCat is actually a category, see estrccat 18214 with the identity function as identity arrow, see estrcid 18215. In the following, some background information about the category of extensible structures is given, taken from the discussion in Github issue #1507 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1507 18215): At the beginning, the categories of non-unital rings RngCat and unital rings RingCat were defined separately (as unordered triples of ordered pairs, see dfrngc2 20764 and dfringc2 20793, but with special compositions). With this definitions, however, Theorem rngcresringcat 20805 could not be proven, because the compositions were not compatible. Unfortunately, no precise definition of the composition within the category of rings could be found in the literature. In section 3.3 EXAMPLES, paragraph (2) of [Adamek] p. 22, however, a definition is given for "Grp", the category of groups: "The following constructs; i.e., categories of structured sets and structure-preserving functions between them (o will always be the composition of functions and idA will always be the identity function on A): ... (b) Grp with objects all groups and morphisms all homomorphisms between them." Therefore, the compositions should have been harmonized by using the composition of the category of sets SetCat, see df-setc 18158, which is the ordinary composition of functions. Analogously, categories of Rngs (and Rings) could have been shown to be restrictions resp. subcategories of the category of sets. BJ and MC observed, however, that "... ↾cat [cannot be used] to restrict the category Set to Ring, because the homs are different. Although Ring is a concrete category, a hom between rings R and S is a function (Base`R) --> (Base`S) with certain properties, unlike in Set where it is a function R --> S.". Therefore, MC suggested that "we could have an alternative version of the Set category consisting of extensible structures (in U) together with (A Hom B) := (Base`A) --> (Base`B). This category is not isomorphic to Set because different extensible structures can have the same base set, but it is equivalent to Set; the relevant functors are (U`A) = (Base`A), the forgetful functor, and (F`A) = { <. (Base`ndx), A >. }". This led to the current definition of ExtStrCat, see df-estrc 18204. The claimed equivalence is proven by equivestrcsetc 18233. Having a definition of a category of extensible structures, the categories of non-unital and unital rings can be defined as appropriate restrictions of the category of extensible structures, see df-rngc 20753 and df-ringc 20782. In the same way, more subcategories could be provided, resulting in the following "inclusion chain" by proving theorems like rngcresringcat 20805, although the morphisms of the shown categories are different ( "->" means "is subcategory of"): RingCat-> RngCat-> GrpCat -> MndCat -> MgmCat -> ExtStrCat According to MC, "If we generalize from subcategories to embeddings, then we can even fit SetCat into the chain, equivalent to ExtStrCat at the end." As mentioned before, the equivalence of SetCat and ExtStrCat is proven by equivestrcsetc 18233. Furthermore, it can be shown that SetCat is embedded into ExtStrCat, see embedsetcestrc 18248. Remark: equivestrcsetc 18233 as well as embedsetcestrc 18248 require that the index of the base set extractor is contained within the considered universe. This is ensured by assuming that the natural numbers are contained within the considered universe: ω ∈ 𝑈 (see wunndx 17280), but it would be currently sufficient to assume that 1 ∈ 𝑈, because the index value of the base set extractor is hard-coded as 1, see basendx 17303. Some people, however, feel uncomfortable to say that a ring "is a" group (without mentioning the restriction to the addition, which is usually found in the literature, e.g., the definition of a ring in [Herstein] p. 126: "... Note that so far all we have said is that R is an abelian group under +.". The main argument against a ring being a group is the number of components/slots: usually, a group consists of (exactly!) two components (a base set and an operation), whereas a ring consists of (exactly!) three components (a base set and two operations). According to this "definition", a ring cannot be a group. This is also an (unfortunately informal) argument for the category of rings not being a subcategory of the category of abelian groups in "Categories and Functors", Bodo Pareigis, Academic Press, New York, London, 1970: "A category A is called a subcategory of a category B if Ob(A) ⊆ Ob(B) and MorA(X,Y) ⊆ MorB(X,Y) for all X,Y e. Ob(A), if the composition of morphisms in A coincides with the composition of the same morphisms in B and if the identity of an object in A is also the identity of the same object viewed as an object in B. Then there is a forgetful functor from A to B. We note that Ri [the category of rings] is not a subcategory of Ab [the category of abelian groups]. In fact, Ob(Ri) ⊆ Ob(Ab) is not true, although every ring can also be regarded as an abelian group. The corresponding abelian groups of two rings may coincide even if the rings do not coincide. The multiplication may be defined differently.". As long as we define Rings, Groups, etc. in a way that 𝐴 ∈ Ring → 𝐴 ∈ Grp is valid (see ringgrp 20351) the corresponding categories are in a subcategory relation. If we do not want Rings to be Groups (then the category of rings would not be a subcategory of the category of groups, as observed by Pareigis), we would have to change the definitions of Magmas, Monoids, Groups, Rings etc. to restrict them to have exactly the required number of slots, so that the following holds 𝑔 ∈ Grp → 𝑔 Struct ⟨(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx)⟩ 𝑟 ∈ Ring → 𝑟 Struct ⟨(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx), (.r‘ndx)⟩
Theorem	fncnvimaeqv 18201	The inverse images of the universal class V under functions on the universal class V are the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn V → (◡𝐹 “ V) = V)
Theorem	bascnvimaeqv 18202	The inverse image of the universal class V under the base function is the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡Base “ V) = V
Syntax	cestrc 18203	Extend class notation to include the category ExtStr.
class ExtStrCat
Definition	df-estrc 18204*	Definition of the category ExtStr of extensible structures. This is the category whose objects are all sets in a universe 𝑢 regarded as extensible structures and whose morphisms are the functions between their base sets. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 18202 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ExtStrCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑢⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	estrcval 18205*	Value of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	estrcbas 18206	Set of objects of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶))
Theorem	estrchomfval 18207*	Set of morphisms ("arrows") of the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥))))
Theorem	estrchom 18208	The morphisms between extensible structures are mappings between their base sets. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	elestrchom 18209	A morphism between extensible structures is a function between their base sets. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵))
Theorem	estrccofval 18210*	Composition in the category of extensible structures. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((Base‘𝑧) ↑m (Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣))), 𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(2nd ‘𝑣)) ↑m (Base‘(1st ‘𝑣))) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))
Theorem	estrcco 18211	Composition in the category of extensible structures. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (Base‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	estrcbasbas 18212	An element of the base set of the base set of the category of extensible structures (i.e. the base set of an extensible structure) belongs to the considered weak universe. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) → (Base‘𝐸) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	estrccatid 18213*	Lemma for estrccat 18214. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑥)))))
Theorem	estrccat 18214	The category of extensible structures is a category. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	estrcid 18215	The identity arrow in the category of extensible structures is the identity function of base sets. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑋)))
Theorem	estrchomfn 18216	The Hom-set operation in the category of extensible structures (in a universe) is a function. (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn (𝑈 × 𝑈))
Theorem	estrchomfeqhom 18217	The functionalized Hom-set operation equals the Hom-set operation in the category of extensible structures (in a universe). (Contributed by AV, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = 𝐻)
Theorem	estrreslem1 18218	Lemma 1 for estrres 18220. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))
Theorem	estrreslem2 18219	Lemma 2 for estrres 18220. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝐶)
Theorem	estrres 18220	Any restriction of a category (as an extensible structure which is an unordered triple of ordered pairs) is an unordered triple of ordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 15-Mar-2020.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ↾s 𝐴) sSet ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐺⟩) = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐴⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐺⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem1 18221*	Lemma 1 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (Base‘𝑋))
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem2 18222*	Lemma 2 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem3 18223*	Lemma 3 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶)
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem4 18224*	Lemma 4 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 22-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵))
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem5 18225*	Lemma 5 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Base‘𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌) = ( I ↾ (𝑁 ↑m 𝑀)))
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem6 18226*	Lemma 6 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Base‘𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑁 ↑m 𝑀)) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻) = 𝐻)
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem7 18227*	Lemma 7 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑋)‘((Id‘𝐸)‘𝑋)) = ((Id‘𝑆)‘(𝐹‘𝑋)))
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem8 18228*	Lemma 8 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑌)⟶((𝐹‘𝑋)(Hom ‘𝑆)(𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	funcestrcsetclem9 18229*	Lemma 9 for funcestrcsetc 18230. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐸)𝑍))) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝐸)𝑍)𝐻)) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐾)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩(comp‘𝑆)(𝐹‘𝑍))((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻)))
Theorem	funcestrcsetc 18230*	The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set, preserving the morphisms as mappings between the corresponding base sets. (Contributed by AV, 23-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Func 𝑆)𝐺)
Theorem	fthestrcsetc 18231*	The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is faithful. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Faith 𝑆)𝐺)
Theorem	fullestrcsetc 18232*	The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is full. (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐸 Full 𝑆)𝐺)
Theorem	equivestrcsetc 18233*	The "natural forgetful functor" from the category of extensible structures into the category of sets which sends each extensible structure to its base set is an equivalence. According to definition 3.33 (1) of [Adamek] p. 36, "A functor F : A -> B is called an equivalence provided that it is full, faithful, and isomorphism-dense in the sense that for any B-object B' there exists some A-object A' such that F(A') is isomorphic to B'.". Therefore, the category of sets and the category of extensible structures are equivalent, according to definition 3.33 (2) of [Adamek] p. 36, "Categories A and B are called equivalent provided that there is an equivalence from A to B.". (Contributed by AV, 2-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (Base‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( I ↾ ((Base‘𝑦) ↑m (Base‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘ndx) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝐸 Faith 𝑆)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹(𝐸 Full 𝑆)𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑖 𝑖:𝑏–1-1-onto→(𝐹‘𝑎)))
Theorem	setc1strwun 18234	A constructed one-slot structure with the objects of the category of sets as base set in a weak universe. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑋⟩} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem1 18235*	Lemma 1 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑋⟩})
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem2 18236*	Lemma 2 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem3 18237*	Lemma 3 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐵)
Theorem	embedsetcestrclem 18238*	Lemma for embedsetcestrc 18248. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem4 18239*	Lemma 4 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐶))
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem5 18240*	Lemma 5 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌) = ( I ↾ (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋)))
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem6 18241*	Lemma 6 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋)) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻) = 𝐻)
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem7 18242*	Lemma 7 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 27-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑋)‘((Id‘𝑆)‘𝑋)) = ((Id‘𝐸)‘(𝐹‘𝑋)))
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem8 18243*	Lemma 8 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑋𝐺𝑌):(𝑋(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑌)⟶((𝐹‘𝑋)(Hom ‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	funcsetcestrclem9 18244*	Lemma 9 for funcsetcestrc 18245. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐻 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝑆)𝑍))) → ((𝑋𝐺𝑍)‘(𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝑆)𝑍)𝐻)) = (((𝑌𝐺𝑍)‘𝐾)(⟨(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)⟩(comp‘𝐸)(𝐹‘𝑍))((𝑋𝐺𝑌)‘𝐻)))
Theorem	funcsetcestrc 18245*	The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only, preserving the morphisms as mappings between the corresponding base sets. (Contributed by AV, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Func 𝐸)𝐺)
Theorem	fthsetcestrc 18246*	The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is faithful. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Faith 𝐸)𝐺)
Theorem	fullsetcestrc 18247*	The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is full. (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑆 Full 𝐸)𝐺)
Theorem	embedsetcestrc 18248*	The "embedding functor" from the category of sets into the category of extensible structures which sends each set to an extensible structure consisting of the base set slot only is an embedding. According to definition 3.27 (1) of [Adamek] p. 34, a functor "F is called an embedding provided that F is injective on morphisms", or according to remark 3.28 (1) in [Adamek] p. 34, "a functor is an embedding if and only if it is faithful and injective on objects". (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑥⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ( I ↾ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ExtStrCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑆 Faith 𝐸)𝐺 ∧ 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→𝐵))
8.4  Categorical constructions
8.4.1  Product of categories
Syntax	cxpc 18249	Extend class notation with the product of two categories.
class ×c
Syntax	c1stf 18250	Extend class notation with the first projection functor.
class 1stF
Syntax	c2ndf 18251	Extend class notation with the second projection functor.
class 2ndF
Syntax	cprf 18252	Extend class notation with the functor pairing operation.
class ⟨,⟩F
Definition	df-xpc 18253*	Define the binary product of categories, which has objects for each pair of objects of the factors, and morphisms for each pair of morphisms of the factors. Composition is componentwise. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ×c = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌⦋(𝑢 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)(Hom ‘𝑟)(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)(Hom ‘𝑠)(2nd ‘𝑣)))) / ℎ⦌{⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑏⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), ℎ⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)ℎ𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (ℎ‘𝑥) ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑔)(⟨(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩(comp‘𝑟)(1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩(comp‘𝑠)(2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))⟩})
Definition	df-1stf 18254*	Define the first projection functor out of the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 1stF = (𝑟 ∈ Cat, 𝑠 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌⟨(1st ↾ 𝑏), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (1st ↾ (𝑥(Hom ‘(𝑟 ×c 𝑠))𝑦)))⟩)
Definition	df-2ndf 18255*	Define the second projection functor out of the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 2ndF = (𝑟 ∈ Cat, 𝑠 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑟) × (Base‘𝑠)) / 𝑏⦌⟨(2nd ↾ 𝑏), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (2nd ↾ (𝑥(Hom ‘(𝑟 ×c 𝑠))𝑦)))⟩)
Definition	df-prf 18256*	Define the pairing operation for functors (which takes two functors 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐸 and produces (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺):𝐶⟶(𝐷 ×c 𝐸)). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ⟨,⟩F = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ ⦋dom (1st ‘𝑓) / 𝑏⦌⟨(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥), ((1st ‘𝑔)‘𝑥)⟩), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (ℎ ∈ dom (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦) ↦ ⟨((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘ℎ), ((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑔)𝑦)‘ℎ)⟩))⟩)
Theorem	fnxpc 18257	The binary product of categories is a two-argument function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ×c Fn (V × V)
Theorem	xpcval 18258*	Value of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑋 × 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)𝐻(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑣)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐾𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑥) ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑔)(⟨(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩ · (1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩ ∙ (2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐾⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), 𝑂⟩})
Theorem	xpcbas 18259	Set of objects of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 × 𝑌) = (Base‘𝑇)
Theorem	xpchomfval 18260*	Set of morphisms of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑢 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑢)𝐻(1st ‘𝑣)) × ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑣))))
Theorem	xpchom 18261	Set of morphisms of the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐾𝑌) = (((1st ‘𝑋)𝐻(1st ‘𝑌)) × ((2nd ‘𝑋)𝐽(2nd ‘𝑌))))
Theorem	relxpchom 18262	A hom-set in the binary product of categories is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐾𝑌)
Theorem	xpccofval 18263*	Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐾𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐾‘𝑥) ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑔)(⟨(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩ · (1st ‘𝑦))(1st ‘𝑓)), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩ ∙ (2nd ‘𝑦))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))
Theorem	xpcco 18264	Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = ⟨((1st ‘𝐺)(⟨(1st ‘𝑋), (1st ‘𝑌)⟩ · (1st ‘𝑍))(1st ‘𝐹)), ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨(2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∙ (2nd ‘𝑍))(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
Theorem	xpcco1st 18265	Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍))    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍)𝐹)) = ((1st ‘𝐺)(⟨(1st ‘𝑋), (1st ‘𝑌)⟩ · (1st ‘𝑍))(1st ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	xpcco2nd 18266	Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐾𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐾𝑍))    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍)𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨(2nd ‘𝑋), (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ · (2nd ‘𝑍))(2nd ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	xpchom2 18267	Value of the set of morphisms in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩𝐾⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩) = ((𝑀𝐻𝑃) × (𝑁𝐽𝑄)))
Theorem	xpcco2 18268	Value of composition in the binary product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (comp‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀𝐻𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑁𝐽𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃𝐻𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑄𝐽𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩(⟨⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩, ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩⟩𝑂⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩)⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) = ⟨(𝐾(⟨𝑀, 𝑃⟩ · 𝑅)𝐹), (𝐿(⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩ ∙ 𝑆)𝐺)⟩)
Theorem	xpccatid 18269*	The product of two categories is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Id‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝑇) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ⟨(𝐼‘𝑥), (𝐽‘𝑦)⟩)))
Theorem	xpcid 18270	The identity morphism in the product of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Id‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩) = ⟨(𝐼‘𝑅), (𝐽‘𝑆)⟩)
Theorem	xpccat 18271	The product of two categories is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	1stfval 18272*	Value of the first projection functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ⟨(1st ↾ 𝐵), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1st ↾ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)))⟩)
Theorem	1stf1 18273	Value of the first projection on an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑃)‘𝑅) = (1st ‘𝑅))
Theorem	1stf2 18274	Value of the first projection on a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅(2nd ‘𝑃)𝑆) = (1st ↾ (𝑅𝐻𝑆)))
Theorem	2ndfval 18275*	Value of the first projection functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = ⟨(2nd ↾ 𝐵), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (2nd ↾ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)))⟩)
Theorem	2ndf1 18276	Value of the first projection on an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑄)‘𝑅) = (2nd ‘𝑅))
Theorem	2ndf2 18277	Value of the first projection on a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅(2nd ‘𝑄)𝑆) = (2nd ↾ (𝑅𝐻𝑆)))
Theorem	1stfcl 18278	The first projection functor is a functor onto the left argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐶 1stF 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑇 Func 𝐶))
Theorem	2ndfcl 18279	The second projection functor is a functor onto the right argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐶 ×c 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑇 Func 𝐷))
Theorem	prfval 18280*	Value of the pairing functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ⟨(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑥), ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑥)⟩), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (ℎ ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ↦ ⟨((𝑥(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦)‘ℎ), ((𝑥(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑦)‘ℎ)⟩))⟩)
Theorem	prf1 18281	Value of the pairing functor on objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑃)‘𝑋) = ⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋), ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	prf2fval 18282*	Value of the pairing functor on morphisms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(2nd ‘𝑃)𝑌) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ⟨((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘ℎ), ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑌)‘ℎ)⟩))
Theorem	prf2 18283	Value of the pairing functor on morphisms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝑃)𝑌)‘𝐾) = ⟨((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝐾), ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑌)‘𝐾)⟩)
Theorem	prfcl 18284	The pairing of functors 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐷 and 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷 is a functor ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩:𝐶⟶(𝐷 × 𝐸). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐷 ×c 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑇))
Theorem	prf1st 18285	Cancellation of pairing with first projection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷 1stF 𝐸) ∘func 𝑃) = 𝐹)
Theorem	prf2nd 18286	Cancellation of pairing with second projection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐹 ⟨,⟩F 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷 2ndF 𝐸) ∘func 𝑃) = 𝐺)
Theorem	1st2ndprf 18287	Break a functor into a product category into first and second projections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐷 ×c 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (((𝐷 1stF 𝐸) ∘func 𝐹) ⟨,⟩F ((𝐷 2ndF 𝐸) ∘func 𝐹)))
Theorem	catcxpccl 18288	The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under the product category operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑋 ×c 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpcpropd 18289	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same product category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ×c 𝐶) = (𝐵 ×c 𝐷))
8.4.2  Functor evaluation
Syntax	cevlf 18290	Extend class notation with the evaluation functor.
class evalF
Syntax	ccurf 18291	Extend class notation with the currying of a functor.
class curryF
Syntax	cuncf 18292	Extend class notation with the uncurrying of a functor.
class uncurryF
Syntax	cdiag 18293	Extend class notation to include the diagonal functor.
class Δfunc
Definition	df-evlf 18294*	Define the evaluation functor, which is the extension of the evaluation map 𝑓, 𝑥 ↦ (𝑓‘𝑥) of functors, to a functor (𝐶⟶𝐷) × 𝐶⟶𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ evalF = (𝑐 ∈ Cat, 𝑑 ∈ Cat ↦ ⟨(𝑓 ∈ (𝑐 Func 𝑑), 𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)), (𝑥 ∈ ((𝑐 Func 𝑑) × (Base‘𝑐)), 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑐 Func 𝑑) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑥) / 𝑚⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑦) / 𝑛⦌(𝑎 ∈ (𝑚(𝑐 Nat 𝑑)𝑛), 𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)(2nd ‘𝑦)) ↦ ((𝑎‘(2nd ‘𝑦))(⟨((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑥)), ((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑦))⟩(comp‘𝑑)((1st ‘𝑛)‘(2nd ‘𝑦)))(((2nd ‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝑚)(2nd ‘𝑦))‘𝑔))))⟩)
Definition	df-curf 18295*	Define the curry functor, which maps a functor 𝐹:𝐶 × 𝐷⟶𝐸 to curryF (𝐹):𝐶⟶(𝐷⟶𝐸). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ curryF = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑒) / 𝑑⦌⟨(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨(𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑥(1st ‘𝑓)𝑦)), (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑑), 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝑑)𝑧) ↦ (((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(2nd ‘𝑓)⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)𝑔)))⟩), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦) ↦ (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩(2nd ‘𝑓)⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)((Id‘𝑑)‘𝑧)))))⟩)
Definition	df-uncf 18296*	Define the uncurry functor, which can be defined equationally using evalF. Strictly speaking, the third category argument is not needed, since the resulting functor is extensionally equal regardless, but it is used in the equational definition and is too much work to remove. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.)
⊢ uncurryF = (𝑐 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑐‘1) evalF (𝑐‘2)) ∘func ((𝑓 ∘func ((𝑐‘0) 1stF (𝑐‘1))) ⟨,⟩F ((𝑐‘0) 2ndF (𝑐‘1)))))
Definition	df-diag 18297*	Define the diagonal functor, which is the functor 𝐶⟶(𝐷 Func 𝐶) whose object part is 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑥). The value of the functor at an object 𝑥 is the constant functor which maps all objects in 𝐷 to 𝑥 and all morphisms to 1(𝑥). The morphism part is a natural transformation between these functors, which takes 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝑦 to the natural transformation with every component equal to 𝑓. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Δfunc = (𝑐 ∈ Cat, 𝑑 ∈ Cat ↦ (⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ curryF (𝑐 1stF 𝑑)))
Theorem	evlfval 18298*	Value of the evaluation functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ⟨(𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)), (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶 Func 𝐷) × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐶 Func 𝐷) × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑥) / 𝑚⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑦) / 𝑛⦌(𝑎 ∈ (𝑚𝑁𝑛), 𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻(2nd ‘𝑦)) ↦ ((𝑎‘(2nd ‘𝑦))(⟨((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑥)), ((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑦))⟩ · ((1st ‘𝑛)‘(2nd ‘𝑦)))(((2nd ‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝑚)(2nd ‘𝑦))‘𝑔))))⟩)
Theorem	evlf2 18299*	Value of the evaluation functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑌)(⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋), ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)⟩ · ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑌))((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝑔))))
Theorem	evlf2val 18300	Value of the evaluation natural transformation at an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐾) = ((𝐴‘𝑌)(⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋), ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)⟩ · ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑌))((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝐾)))