P. 183 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18201-18300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	ccoda 18201	Extend class notation to include the codomain extractor for an arrow.
class coda
Syntax	carw 18202	Extend class notation to include the collection of all arrows of a category.
class Arrow
Syntax	choma 18203	Extend class notation to include the set of all arrows with a specific domain and codomain.
class Homa
Definition	df-doma 18204	Definition of the domain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ doma = (1st ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-coda 18205	Definition of the codomain extractor for an arrow. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ coda = (2nd ∘ 1st )
Definition	df-homa 18206*	Definition of the hom-set extractor for arrows, which tags the morphisms of the underlying hom-set with domain and codomain, which can then be extracted using df-doma 18204 and df-coda 18205. (Contributed by FL, 6-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)) ↦ ({𝑥} × ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-arw 18207	Definition of the set of arrows of a category. We will use the term "arrow" to denote a morphism tagged with its domain and codomain, as opposed to Hom, which allows hom-sets for distinct objects to overlap. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Arrow = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ∪ ran (Homa‘𝑐))
Theorem	homarcl 18208	Reverse closure for an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	homafval 18209*	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ ({𝑥} × (𝐽‘𝑥))))
Theorem	homaf 18210	Functionality of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐵 × 𝐵)⟶𝒫 ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × V))
Theorem	homaval 18211	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = ({⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩} × (𝑋𝐽𝑌)))
Theorem	elhoma 18212	Value of the disjointified hom-set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))))
Theorem	elhomai 18213	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹)
Theorem	elhomai2 18214	Produce an arrow from a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝐹⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
Theorem	homarcl2 18215	Reverse closure for the domain and codomain of an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	homarel 18216	An arrow is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝑋𝐻𝑌)
Theorem	homa1 18217	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	homahom2 18218	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍(𝑋𝐻𝑌)𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homahom 18219	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	homadm 18220	The domain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (doma‘𝐹) = 𝑋)
Theorem	homacd 18221	The codomain of an arrow with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → (coda‘𝐹) = 𝑌)
Theorem	homadmcd 18222	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) → 𝐹 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
Theorem	arwval 18223	The set of arrows is the union of all the disjointified hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ran 𝐻
Theorem	arwrcl 18224	The first component of an arrow is the ordered pair of domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	arwhoma 18225	An arrow is contained in the hom-set corresponding to its domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐻(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	homarw 18226	A hom-set is a subset of the collection of all arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	arwdm 18227	The domain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (doma‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	arwcd 18228	The codomain of an arrow is an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (coda‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dmaf 18229	The domain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (doma ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	cdaf 18230	The codomain function is a function from arrows to objects. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (coda ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵
Theorem	arwhom 18231	The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))
Theorem	arwdmcd 18232	Decompose an arrow into domain, codomain, and morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 = ⟨(doma‘𝐹), (coda‘𝐹), (2nd ‘𝐹)⟩)
8.2.1  Identity and composition for arrows
Syntax	cida 18233	Extend class notation to include identity for arrows.
class Ida
Syntax	ccoa 18234	Extend class notation to include composition for arrows.
class compa
Definition	df-ida 18235*	Definition of the identity arrow, which is just the identity morphism tagged with its domain and codomain. (Contributed by FL, 26-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Ida = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)⟩))
Definition	df-coa 18236*	Definition of the composition of arrows. Since arrows are tagged with domain and codomain, this does not need to be a quinary operation like the regular composition in a category comp. Instead, it is a partial binary operation on arrows, which is defined when the domain of the first arrow matches the codomain of the second. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compa = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐), 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ (Arrow‘𝑐) ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩(comp‘𝑐)(coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩))
Theorem	idafval 18237*	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨𝑥, 𝑥, ( 1 ‘𝑥)⟩))
Theorem	idaval 18238	Value of the identity arrow function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑋, ( 1 ‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	ida2 18239	Morphism part of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = ( 1 ‘𝑋))
Theorem	idahom 18240	Domain and codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	idadm 18241	Domain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (doma‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idacd 18242	Codomain of the identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (coda‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	idaf 18243	The identity arrow function is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:𝐵⟶𝐴)
Theorem	coafval 18244*	The value of the composition of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 ∈ {ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (coda‘ℎ) = (doma‘𝑔)} ↦ ⟨(doma‘𝑓), (coda‘𝑔), ((2nd ‘𝑔)(⟨(doma‘𝑓), (doma‘𝑔)⟩ ∙ (coda‘𝑔))(2nd ‘𝑓))⟩)
Theorem	eldmcoa 18245	A pair ⟨𝐺, 𝐹⟩ is in the domain of the arrow composition, if the domain of 𝐺 equals the codomain of 𝐹. (In this case we say 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺dom · 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (coda‘𝐹) = (doma‘𝐺)))
Theorem	dmcoass 18246	The domain of composition is a collection of pairs of arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom · ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	homdmcoa 18247	If 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 and 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍, then 𝐺 and 𝐹 are composable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺dom · 𝐹)
Theorem	coaval 18248	Value of composition for composable arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑍, ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹))⟩)
Theorem	coa2 18249	The morphism part of arrow composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐺 · 𝐹)) = ((2nd ‘𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)(2nd ‘𝐹)))
Theorem	coahom 18250	The composition of two composable arrows is an arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 · 𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
Theorem	coapm 18251	Composition of arrows is a partial binary operation on arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ · ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	arwlid 18252	Left identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌) · 𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwrid 18253	Right identity of a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 · ( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹)
Theorem	arwass 18254	Associativity of composition in a category using arrow notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Homa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (compa‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Ida‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 · 𝐺) · 𝐹) = (𝐾 · (𝐺 · 𝐹)))
8.3  Examples of categories
8.3.1  The category of sets
Syntax	csetc 18255	Extend class notation to include the category Set.
class SetCat
Definition	df-setc 18256*	Definition of the category Set, relativized to a subset 𝑢. Example 3.3(1) of [Adamek] p. 22. This is the category of all sets in 𝑢 and functions between these sets. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. (Contributed by FL, 8-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ SetCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑢⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑢 × 𝑢), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	setcval 18257*	Value of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	setcbas 18258	Set of objects of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐶))
Theorem	setchomfval 18259*	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑦 ↑m 𝑥)))
Theorem	setchom 18260	Set of arrows of the category of sets (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑌 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	elsetchom 18261	A morphism of sets is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌))
Theorem	setccofval 18262*	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝑈 × 𝑈), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑧 ↑m (2nd ‘𝑣)), 𝑓 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) ↑m (1st ‘𝑣)) ↦ (𝑔 ∘ 𝑓))))
Theorem	setcco 18263	Composition in the category of sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	setccatid 18264*	Lemma for setccat 18265. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥))))
Theorem	setccat 18265	The category of sets is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	setcid 18266	The identity arrow in the category of sets is the identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = ( I ↾ 𝑋))
Theorem	setcmon 18267	A monomorphism of sets is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (Mono‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝑀𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–1-1→𝑌))
Theorem	setcepi 18268	An epimorphism of sets is a surjection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Epi‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2o ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐸𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–onto→𝑌))
Theorem	setcsect 18269	A section in the category of sets, written out. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑆𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌 ∧ 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑋 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝑋))))
Theorem	setcinv 18270	An inverse in the category of sets is the converse operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(𝑋𝑁𝑌)𝐺 ↔ (𝐹:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌 ∧ 𝐺 = ◡𝐹)))
Theorem	setciso 18271	An isomorphism in the category of sets is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝐹:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌))
Theorem	resssetc 18272	The restriction of the category of sets to a subset is the category of sets in the subset. Thus, the SetCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷)))
Theorem	funcsetcres2 18273	A functor into a smaller category of sets is a functor into the larger category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 Func 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐸 Func 𝐶))
Theorem	setc2obas 18274	∅ and 1o are distinct objects in (SetCat‘2o). This combined with setc2ohom 18275 demonstrates that the category does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets. See also df-cat 17847 and cat1 18277. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 1o ≠ ∅)
Theorem	setc2ohom 18275	(SetCat‘2o) is a category (provable from setccat 18265 and 2oex 8491) that does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets, proved by this theorem combined with setc2obas 18274. Notably, the empty set ∅ is simultaneously an object (setc2obas 18274), an identity morphism from ∅ to ∅ (setcid 18266 or thincid 50660), and a non-identity morphism from ∅ to 1o. See cat1lem 18276 and cat1 18277 for a more general statement. This category is also thin (setc2othin 50694), and therefore is "equivalent" to a preorder (actually a partial order). See prsthinc 50692 for more details on the "equivalence". (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘2o)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ∈ ((∅𝐻∅) ∩ (∅𝐻1o))
Theorem	cat1lem 18276*	The category of sets in a "universe" containing the empty set and another set does not have pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. Lemma for cat1 18277. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∩ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)) ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
Theorem	cat1 18277*	The definition of category df-cat 17847 does not impose pairwise disjoint hom-sets as required in Axiom CAT 1 in [Lang] p. 53. See setc2obas 18274 and setc2ohom 18275 for a counterexample. For a version with pairwise disjoint hom-sets, see df-homa 18206 and its subsection. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑐 ∈ Cat [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ] ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 (((𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∩ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)) ≠ ∅ → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))
8.3.2  The category of categories
Syntax	ccatc 18278	Extend class notation to include the category Cat.
class CatCat
Definition	df-catc 18279*	Definition of the category Cat, which consists of all categories in the universe 𝑢 (i.e., "𝑢-small categories", see Definition 3.44. of [Adamek] p. 39), with functors as the morphisms (catchom 18283, elcatchom 50625). Definition 3.47 of [Adamek] p. 40. We do not introduce a specific definition for "𝑢-large categories", which can be expressed as (Cat ∖ 𝑢). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ CatCat = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑢 ∩ Cat) / 𝑏⦌{⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑏⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦))⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑣 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓)))⟩})
Theorem	catcval 18280*	Value of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), · ⟩})
Theorem	catcbas 18281	Set of objects of the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑈 ∩ Cat))
Theorem	catchomfval 18282*	Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 Func 𝑦)))
Theorem	catchom 18283	Set of arrows of the category of categories (in a universe). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋 Func 𝑌))
Theorem	catccofval 18284*	Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑣) Func 𝑧), 𝑓 ∈ ( Func ‘𝑣) ↦ (𝑔 ∘func 𝑓))))
Theorem	catcco 18285	Composition in the category of categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 Func 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌 Func 𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺 ∘func 𝐹))
Theorem	catccatid 18286*	Lemma for catccat 18288. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (idfunc‘𝑥))))
Theorem	catcid 18287	The identity arrow in the category of categories is the identity functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (idfunc‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = 𝐼)
Theorem	catccat 18288	The category of categories is a category, see remark 3.48 in [Adamek] p. 40. (Clearly it cannot be an element of itself, hence it is "𝑈 -large".) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	resscatc 18289	The restriction of the category of categories to a subset is the category of categories in the subset. Thus, the CatCat‘𝑈 categories for different 𝑈 are full subcategories of each other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (CatCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ∧ (compf‘(𝐶 ↾s 𝑉)) = (compf‘𝐷)))
Theorem	catcisolem 18290*	Lemma for catciso 18291. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ◡((◡𝐹‘𝑥)𝐺(◡𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌))𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩(𝑋𝐼𝑌)⟨◡𝐹, 𝐻⟩)
Theorem	catciso 18291	A functor is an isomorphism of categories if and only if it is full and faithful, and is a bijection on the objects. Remark 3.28(2) in [Adamek] p. 34. Note that "catciso.u" is redundant thanks to elbasfv 17398. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ ((𝑋 Full 𝑌) ∩ (𝑋 Faith 𝑌)) ∧ (1st ‘𝐹):𝑅–1-1-onto→𝑆)))
Theorem	catcbascl 18292	An element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18297. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	catcslotelcl 18293	A slot entry of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18297. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	catcbaselcl 18294	The base set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18297. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	catchomcl 18295	The Hom-set of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18297. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Hom ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	catcccocl 18296	The composition operation of an element of the base set of the category of categories for a weak universe belongs to the weak universe. Formerly part of the proof for catcoppccl 18297. (Contributed by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	catcoppccl 18297	The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under taking opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	catcfuccl 18298	The category of categories for a weak universe is closed under the functor category operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (CatCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑋 FuncCat 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵)
8.3.3  The category of extensible structures The "category of extensible structures" ExtStrCat is the category of all sets in a universe regarded as extensible structures and the functions between their base sets, see df-estrc 18302. Since we consider only "small categories" (i.e. categories whose objects and morphisms are actually sets and not proper classes), the objects of the category (i.e. the base set of the category regarded as extensible structure) are all sets in a universe 𝑢, which can be an arbitrary set, see estrcbas 18304. Generally, we will take 𝑢 to be a weak universe or Grothendieck universe, because these sets have closure properties as good as the real thing. If a set is not a real extensible structure, it is regarded as extensible structure with an empty base set. Because of bascnvimaeqv 18300 we do not need to restrict the universe to sets which "have a base". The morphisms (or arrows) between two objects, i.e. sets from the universe, are the mappings between their base sets, see estrchomfval 18305, whereas the composition is the ordinary composition of functions, see estrccofval 18308 and estrcco 18309. It is shown that the category of extensible structures ExtStrCat is actually a category, see estrccat 18312 with the identity function as identity arrow, see estrcid 18313. In the following, some background information about the category of extensible structures is given, taken from the discussion in Github issue #1507 (see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/1507 18313): At the beginning, the categories of non-unital rings RngCat and unital rings RingCat were defined separately (as unordered triples of ordered pairs, see dfrngc2 20885 and dfringc2 20914, but with special compositions). With this definitions, however, Theorem rngcresringcat 20926 could not be proven, because the compositions were not compatible. Unfortunately, no precise definition of the composition within the category of rings could be found in the literature. In section 3.3 EXAMPLES, paragraph (2) of [Adamek] p. 22, however, a definition is given for "Grp", the category of groups: "The following constructs; i.e., categories of structured sets and structure-preserving functions between them (o will always be the composition of functions and idA will always be the identity function on A): ... (b) Grp with objects all groups and morphisms all homomorphisms between them." Therefore, the compositions should have been harmonized by using the composition of the category of sets SetCat, see df-setc 18256, which is the ordinary composition of functions. Analogously, categories of Rngs (and Rings) could have been shown to be restrictions resp. subcategories of the category of sets. BJ and MC observed, however, that "... ↾cat [cannot be used] to restrict the category Set to Ring, because the homs are different. Although Ring is a concrete category, a hom between rings R and S is a function (Base`R) --> (Base`S) with certain properties, unlike in Set where it is a function R --> S.". Therefore, MC suggested that "we could have an alternative version of the Set category consisting of extensible structures (in U) together with (A Hom B) := (Base`A) --> (Base`B). This category is not isomorphic to Set because different extensible structures can have the same base set, but it is equivalent to Set; the relevant functors are (U`A) = (Base`A), the forgetful functor, and (F`A) = { <. (Base`ndx), A >. }". This led to the current definition of ExtStrCat, see df-estrc 18302. The claimed equivalence is proven by equivestrcsetc 18331. Having a definition of a category of extensible structures, the categories of non-unital and unital rings can be defined as appropriate restrictions of the category of extensible structures, see df-rngc 20874 and df-ringc 20903. In the same way, more subcategories could be provided, resulting in the following "inclusion chain" by proving theorems like rngcresringcat 20926, although the morphisms of the shown categories are different ( "->" means "is subcategory of"): RingCat-> RngCat-> GrpCat -> MndCat -> MgmCat -> ExtStrCat According to MC, "If we generalize from subcategories to embeddings, then we can even fit SetCat into the chain, equivalent to ExtStrCat at the end." As mentioned before, the equivalence of SetCat and ExtStrCat is proven by equivestrcsetc 18331. Furthermore, it can be shown that SetCat is embedded into ExtStrCat, see embedsetcestrc 18346. Remark: equivestrcsetc 18331 as well as embedsetcestrc 18346 require that the index of the base set extractor is contained within the considered universe. This is ensured by assuming that the natural numbers are contained within the considered universe: ω ∈ 𝑈 (see wunndx 17378), but it would be currently sufficient to assume that 1 ∈ 𝑈, because the index value of the base set extractor is hard-coded as 1, see basendx 17401. Some people, however, feel uncomfortable to say that a ring "is a" group (without mentioning the restriction to the addition, which is usually found in the literature, e.g., the definition of a ring in [Herstein] p. 126: "... Note that so far all we have said is that R is an abelian group under +.". The main argument against a ring being a group is the number of components/slots: usually, a group consists of (exactly!) two components (a base set and an operation), whereas a ring consists of (exactly!) three components (a base set and two operations). According to this "definition", a ring cannot be a group. This is also an (unfortunately informal) argument for the category of rings not being a subcategory of the category of abelian groups in "Categories and Functors", Bodo Pareigis, Academic Press, New York, London, 1970: "A category A is called a subcategory of a category B if Ob(A) ⊆ Ob(B) and MorA(X,Y) ⊆ MorB(X,Y) for all X,Y e. Ob(A), if the composition of morphisms in A coincides with the composition of the same morphisms in B and if the identity of an object in A is also the identity of the same object viewed as an object in B. Then there is a forgetful functor from A to B. We note that Ri [the category of rings] is not a subcategory of Ab [the category of abelian groups]. In fact, Ob(Ri) ⊆ Ob(Ab) is not true, although every ring can also be regarded as an abelian group. The corresponding abelian groups of two rings may coincide even if the rings do not coincide. The multiplication may be defined differently.". As long as we define Rings, Groups, etc. in a way that 𝐴 ∈ Ring → 𝐴 ∈ Grp is valid (see ringgrp 20469) the corresponding categories are in a subcategory relation. If we do not want Rings to be Groups (then the category of rings would not be a subcategory of the category of groups, as observed by Pareigis), we would have to change the definitions of Magmas, Monoids, Groups, Rings etc. to restrict them to have exactly the required number of slots, so that the following holds 𝑔 ∈ Grp → 𝑔 Struct ⟨(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx)⟩ 𝑟 ∈ Ring → 𝑟 Struct ⟨(Base‘ndx), (+g‘ndx), (.r‘ndx)⟩
Theorem	fncnvimaeqv 18299	The inverse images of the universal class V under functions on the universal class V are the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn V → (◡𝐹 “ V) = V)
Theorem	bascnvimaeqv 18300	The inverse image of the universal class V under the base function is the universal class V itself. (Proposed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2020.) (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (◡Base “ V) = V