| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 406 of 497) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30845) |
(30846-32368) |
(32369-49617) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48gfv1 40501* | TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48gfv 40502* | TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48fgv 40503* | TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg49lebilem 40504* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50lebi 40505* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50eq 40506* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50f 40507* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. TODO: can we use just 𝐹 Fn 𝐵 since range is computed in cdleme50rn 40510? (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50f1 40508* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50rnlem 40509* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. TODO: can we get rid of 𝐺 stuff if we show 𝐺 = ◡𝐹 earlier? (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ran 𝐹 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50rn 40510* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ran 𝐹 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50f1o 40511* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50laut 40512* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 is a lattice automorphism. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (LAut‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50ldil 40513* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 is a lattice dilation. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((LDil‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn1 40514* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) case. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn2a 40515* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) case. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn2 40516* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. Remove 𝑆 hypotheses no longer needed from cdleme50trn2a 40515. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn12 40517* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. Combine 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) and ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) cases. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn3 40518* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. 𝑃 = 𝑄 case. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 = 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50trn123 40519* | Part of proof that 𝐹 is a translation. Combine all cases. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑅 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme51finvfvN 40520* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme51finvN 40521* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50ltrn 40522* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 is a lattice translation. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme51finvtrN 40523* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ◡𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme50ex 40524* | Part of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme 40525* | Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. If p,q are atoms not under hyperplane w, then there is a unique translation f such that f(p) = q. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃!𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemf1 40526* | Part of Lemma F in [Crawley] p. 116. TODO: should this or part of it become a stand-alone theorem? (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemf2 40527* | Part of Lemma F in [Crawley] p. 116. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemf 40528* | Lemma F in [Crawley] p. 116. If u is an atom under w, there exists a translation whose trace is u. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑅‘𝑓) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemfnid 40529* | cdlemf 40528 with additional constraint of non-identity. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ((𝑅‘𝑓) = 𝑈 ∧ 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemftr3 40530* | Special case of cdlemf 40528 showing existence of non-identity translation with trace different from any 3 given lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemftr2 40531* | Special case of cdlemf 40528 showing existence of non-identity translation with trace different from any 2 given lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemftr1 40532* | Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, sixth line of third paragraph on p. 117: there is "a translation h, different from the identity, such that tr h ≠ tr f." (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅‘𝑓) ≠ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemftr0 40533* | Special case of cdlemf 40528 showing existence of a non-identity translation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 𝑓 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | trlord 40534* | The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements (under the fiducial hyperplane 𝑊) is determined by the translations whose traces are under them. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ((𝑅‘𝑓) ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑅‘𝑓) ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1a 40535* | Shorter expression for 𝐺. TODO: fix comment. TODO: shorten using cdleme 40525 or vice-versa? Also, if not shortened with cdleme 40525, then it can be moved up to save repeating hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐺 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1b2 40536* | This theorem can be used to shorten 𝐺 = hypothesis. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1idlemN 40537* | Lemma for cdlemg1idN 40542. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1fvawlemN 40538* | Lemma for ltrniotafvawN 40543. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1ltrnlem 40539* | Lemma for ltrniotacl 40544. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1finvtrlemN 40540* | Lemma for ltrniotacnvN 40545. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ◡𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1bOLDN 40541* | This theorem can be used to shorten 𝐹 = hypothesis that have the form of the conclusion. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1idN 40542* | Version of cdleme31id 40359 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotafvawN 40543* | Version of cdleme46fvaw 40466 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotacl 40544* | Version of cdleme50ltrn 40522 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotacnvN 40545* | Version of cdleme51finvtrN 40523 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ◡𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotaval 40546* | Value of the unique translation specified by a value. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotacnvval 40547* | Converse value of the unique translation specified by a value. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (◡𝐹‘𝑄) = 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotaidvalN 40548* | Value of the unique translation specified by identity value. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝐹 = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ltrniotavalbN 40549* | Value of the unique translation specified by a value. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄 ↔ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeiota 40550* | A translation is uniquely determined by one of its values. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = (𝐹‘𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1ci2 40551* | Any function of the form of the function constructed for cdleme 40525 is a translation. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1cN 40552* | Any translation belongs to the set of functions constructed for cdleme 40525. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑃) = 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg1cex 40553* | Any translation is one of our 𝐹 s. TODO: fix comment, move to its own block maybe? Would this help for cdlemf 40528? (Contributed by NM, 17-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = (℩𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 (𝑓‘𝑝) = 𝑞)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2cN 40554* | Any translation belongs to the set of functions constructed for cdleme 40525. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2dN 40555* | This theorem can be used to shorten 𝐺 = hypothesis. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2cex 40556* | Any translation is one of our 𝐹 s. TODO: fix comment, move to its own block maybe? Would this help for cdlemf 40528? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑞 ∨ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2ce 40557* | Utility theorem to eliminate p,q when converting theorems with explicit f. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑞 ∨ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2jlemOLDN 40558* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. TODO: Combine with cdlemg2jOLDN 40563? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑞 ∨ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹‘(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2fvlem 40559* | Lemma for cdlemg2fv 40564. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑞 ∨ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2klem 40560* | cdleme42keg 40451 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑞 ∨ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2idN 40561 | Version of cdleme31id 40359 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg3a 40562 | Part of proof of Lemma G in [Crawley] p. 116, line 19. Show p ∨ q = p ∨ u. TODO: reformat cdleme0cp 40179 to match this, then replace with cdleme0cp 40179. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2jOLDN 40563 | TODO: Replace this with ltrnj 40097. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹‘(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2fv 40564 | Value of a translation in terms of an associated atom. cdleme48fvg 40465 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: Use ltrnj 40097 to vastly simplify. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2fv2 40565 | Value of a translation in terms of an associated atom. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Is this useful elsewhere e.g. around cdlemeg46fjv 40488 that use more complex proofs? TODO: Use ltrnj 40097 to vastly simplify. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2k 40566 | cdleme42keg 40451 with simpler hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: derive from cdlemg3a 40562, cdlemg2fv2 40565, cdlemg2jOLDN 40563, ltrnel 40104? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2kq 40567 | cdlemg2k 40566 with 𝑃 and 𝑄 swapped. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑄) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2l 40568 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg2m 40569 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg5 40570* | TODO: Is there a simpler more direct proof, that could be placed earlier e.g. near lhpexle 39970? TODO: The ∨ hypothesis is unused. FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemb3 40571* | Given two atoms not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. TODO: Is there a simpler more direct proof, that could be placed earlier e.g. near lhpexle 39970? Then replace cdlemb2 40006 with it. This is a more general version of cdlemb2 40006 without 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg7fvbwN 40572 | Properties of a translation of an element not under 𝑊. TODO: Fix comment. Can this be simplified? Perhaps derived from cdleme48bw 40467? Done with a *ltrn* theorem? (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4a 40573 | TODO: FIX COMMENT If fg(p) = p, then tr f = tr g. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4b1 40574 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) = (𝑃 ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4b2 40575 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑉) = (𝑃 ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4b12 40576 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑉) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4c 40577 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉)) → ¬ (𝐺‘𝑄) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4d 40578 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → ¬ (𝐺‘𝑄) ≤ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4e 40579 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = (((𝐺‘𝑄) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄)) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4f 40580 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4g 40581 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg4 40582 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6a 40583* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: replace with cdlemg4 40582. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑟)) = 𝑟) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6b 40584* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: replace with cdlemg4 40582. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑟)) = 𝑟)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6c 40585* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6d 40586* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6e 40587 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑅‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg6 40588 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg7fvN 40589 | Value of a translation composition in terms of an associated atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg7aN 40590 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg7N 40591 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg8a 40592 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = 𝑃)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg8b 40593 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg8c 40594 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg8d 40595 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ≠ 𝑃)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg8 40596 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg9a 40597 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑈)) ≤ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg9b 40598 | The triples 〈𝑃, (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)), (𝐹‘𝑃)〉 and 〈𝑄, (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)), (𝐹‘𝑄)〉 are centrally perspective. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg9 40599 | The triples 〈𝑃, (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)), (𝐹‘𝑃)〉 and 〈𝑄, (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)), (𝐹‘𝑄)〉 are axially perspective by dalaw 39851. Part of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, last 2 lines. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ ((((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃)) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄))) ∨ (((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑄) ∨ 𝑄)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemg10b 40600 | TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Can this be moved up as a stand-alone theorem in ltrn* area? (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |