P. 160 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15901-16000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cosbnd2 15901	The cosine of a real number is in the closed interval from -1 to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘𝐴) ∈ (-1[,]1))
Theorem	ef01bndlem 15902*	Lemma for sin01bnd 15903 and cos01bnd 15904. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((i · 𝐴)↑𝑛) / (!‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4)(𝐹‘𝑘)) < ((𝐴↑4) / 6))
Theorem	sin01bnd 15903	Bounds on the sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((𝐴 − ((𝐴↑3) / 3)) < (sin‘𝐴) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴))
Theorem	cos01bnd 15904	Bounds on the cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((1 − (2 · ((𝐴↑2) / 3))) < (cos‘𝐴) ∧ (cos‘𝐴) < (1 − ((𝐴↑2) / 3))))
Theorem	cos1bnd 15905	Bounds on the cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ ((1 / 3) < (cos‘1) ∧ (cos‘1) < (2 / 3))
Theorem	cos2bnd 15906	Bounds on the cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (-(7 / 9) < (cos‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < -(1 / 9))
Theorem	sinltx 15907	The sine of a positive real number is less than its argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴)
Theorem	sin01gt0 15908	The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴))
Theorem	cos01gt0 15909	The cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (cos‘𝐴))
Theorem	sin02gt0 15910	The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 2 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]2) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴))
Theorem	sincos1sgn 15911	The signs of the sine and cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (0 < (sin‘1) ∧ 0 < (cos‘1))
Theorem	sincos2sgn 15912	The signs of the sine and cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (0 < (sin‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < 0)
Theorem	sin4lt0 15913	The sine of 4 is negative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (sin‘4) < 0
Theorem	absefi 15914	The absolute value of the exponential of an imaginary number is one. Equation 48 of [Rudin] p. 167. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 9-Feb-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1)
Theorem	absef 15915	The absolute value of the exponential is the exponential of the real part. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Sep-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (abs‘(exp‘𝐴)) = (exp‘(ℜ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	absefib 15916	A complex number is real iff the exponential of its product with i has absolute value one. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1))
Theorem	efieq1re 15917	A number whose imaginary exponential is one is real. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = 1) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	demoivre 15918	De Moivre's Formula. Proof by induction given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Moivre's_formula, but restricted to nonnegative integer powers. See also demoivreALT 15919 for an alternate longer proof not using the exponential function. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)))))
Theorem	demoivreALT 15919	Alternate proof of demoivre 15918. It is longer but does not use the exponential function. This is Metamath 100 proof #17. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 10-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)))))
5.11.1.1  The circle constant (tau = 2 pi)
Syntax	ctau 15920	Extend class notation to include the constant tau, τ = 6.28318....
class τ
Definition	df-tau 15921	Define the circle constant tau, τ = 6.28318..., which is the smallest positive real number whose cosine is one. Various notations have been used or proposed for this number including τ, a three-legged variant of π, or 2π. Note the difference between this constant τ and the formula variable 𝜏. Following our convention, the constant is displayed in upright font while the variable is in italic font; furthermore, the colors are different. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = inf((ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})), ℝ, < )
5.11.2  _e is irrational
Theorem	eirrlem 15922*	Lemma for eirr 15923. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (1 / (!‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → e = (𝑃 / 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	eirr 15923	e is irrational. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ e ∉ ℚ
Theorem	egt2lt3 15924	Euler's constant e = 2.71828... is strictly bounded below by 2 and above by 3. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (2 < e ∧ e < 3)
Theorem	epos 15925	Euler's constant e is greater than 0. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ 0 < e
Theorem	epr 15926	Euler's constant e is a positive real. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ e ∈ ℝ+
Theorem	ene0 15927	e is not 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 0
Theorem	ene1 15928	e is not 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 1
5.12  Cardinality of real and complex number subsets
5.12.1  Countability of integers and rationals
Theorem	xpnnen 15929	The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (ℕ × ℕ) ≈ ℕ
Theorem	znnen 15930	The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Exercise 1 of [Gleason] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ℤ ≈ ℕ
Theorem	qnnen 15931	The rational numbers are countable. This proof does not use the Axiom of Choice, even though it uses an onto function, because the base set (ℤ × ℕ) is numerable. Exercise 2 of [Enderton] p. 133. For purposes of the Metamath 100 list, we are considering Mario Carneiro's revision as the date this proof was completed. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ
5.12.2  The reals are uncountable
Theorem	rpnnen2lem1 15932*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑁) = if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, ((1 / 3)↑𝑁), 0))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem2 15933*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴):ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem3 15934*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ seq1( + , (𝐹‘ℕ)) ⇝ (1 / 2)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem4 15935*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (0 ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem5 15936*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → seq𝑀( + , (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	rpnnen2lem6 15937*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem7 15938*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem8 15939*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem9 15940*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑀}))‘𝑘) = (0 + (((1 / 3)↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 − (1 / 3)))))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem10 15941*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem11 15942*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem12 15943*	Lemma for rpnnen2 15944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen2 15944	The other half of rpnnen 15945, where we show an injection from sets of positive integers to real numbers. The obvious choice for this is binary expansion, but it has the unfortunate property that it does not produce an injection on numbers which end with all 0's or all 1's (the more well-known decimal version of this is 0.999... 15602). Instead, we opt for a ternary expansion, which produces (a scaled version of) the Cantor set. Since the Cantor set is riddled with gaps, we can show that any two sequences that are not equal must differ somewhere, and when they do, they are placed a finite distance apart, thus ensuring that the map is injective. Our map assigns to each subset 𝐴 of the positive integers the number Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴(3↑-𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘), where ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, (3↑-𝑘), 0)) (rpnnen2lem1 15932). This is an infinite sum of real numbers (rpnnen2lem2 15933), and since 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies (𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem4 15935) and (𝐹‘ℕ) converges to 1 / 2 (rpnnen2lem3 15934) by geoisum1 15600, the sum is convergent to some real (rpnnen2lem5 15936 and rpnnen2lem6 15937) by the comparison test for convergence cvgcmp 15537. The comparison test also tells us that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies Σ(𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem7 15938). Putting it all together, if we have two sets 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, there must differ somewhere, and so there must be an 𝑚 such that ∀𝑛 < 𝑚(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑦) but 𝑚 ∈ (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) or vice versa. In this case, we split off the first 𝑚 − 1 terms (rpnnen2lem8 15939) and cancel them (rpnnen2lem10 15941), since these are the same for both sets. For the remaining terms, we use the subset property to establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (where these sums are only over (ℤ≥‘𝑚)), and since Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) = (3↑-𝑚) / 2 (rpnnen2lem9 15940) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) = (3↑-𝑚), we establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) < Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (rpnnen2lem11 15942) so that they must be different. By contraposition (rpnnen2lem12 15943), we find that this map is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen 15945	The cardinality of the continuum is the same as the powerset of ω. This is a stronger statement than ruc 15961, which only asserts that ℝ is uncountable, i.e. has a cardinality larger than ω. The main proof is in two parts, rpnnen1 12732 and rpnnen2 15944, each showing an injection in one direction, and this last part uses sbth 8889 to prove that the sets are equinumerous. By constructing explicit injections, we avoid the use of AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ℝ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rexpen 15946	The real numbers are equinumerous to their own Cartesian product, even though it is not necessarily true that ℝ is well-orderable (so we cannot use infxpidm2 9782 directly). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ≈ ℝ
Theorem	cpnnen 15947	The complex numbers are equinumerous to the powerset of the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℂ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rucALT 15948	Alternate proof of ruc 15961. This proof is a simple corollary of rpnnen 15945, which determines the exact cardinality of the reals. For an alternate proof discussed at mmcomplex.html#uncountable 15945, see ruc 15961. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	ruclem1 15949*	Lemma for ruc 15961 (the reals are uncountable). Substitutions for the function 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑋 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, 𝐴, ((((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) + 𝐵) / 2)) ∧ 𝑌 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2), 𝐵)))
Theorem	ruclem2 15950*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Ordering property for the input to 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	ruclem3 15951*	Lemma for ruc 15961. The constructed interval [𝑋, 𝑌] always excludes 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 < 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑀))
Theorem	ruclem4 15952*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Initial value of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
Theorem	ruclem6 15953*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Domain and range of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ0⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
Theorem	ruclem7 15954*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Successor value for the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐺‘𝑁)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	ruclem8 15955*	Lemma for ruc 15961. The intervals of the 𝐺 sequence are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem9 15956*	Lemma for ruc 15961. The first components of the 𝐺 sequence are increasing, and the second components are decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) ≤ (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ≤ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑀))))
Theorem	ruclem10 15957*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Every first component of the 𝐺 sequence is less than every second component. That is, the sequences form a chain a1 < a2 <... < b2 < b1, where ai are the first components and bi are the second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem11 15958*	Lemma for ruc 15961. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))
Theorem	ruclem12 15959*	Lemma for ruc 15961. The supremum of the increasing sequence 1st ∘ 𝐺 is a real number that is not in the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (1st ∘ 𝐺), ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	ruclem13 15960	Lemma for ruc 15961. There is no function that maps ℕ onto ℝ. (Use nex 1803 if you want this in the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:ℕ–onto→ℝ.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐹:ℕ–onto→ℝ
Theorem	ruc 15961	The set of positive integers is strictly dominated by the set of real numbers, i.e. the real numbers are uncountable. The proof consists of lemmas ruclem1 15949 through ruclem13 15960 and this final piece. Our proof is based on the proof of Theorem 5.18 of [Truss] p. 114. See ruclem13 15960 for the function existence version of this theorem. For an informal discussion of this proof, see mmcomplex.html#uncountable 15960. For an alternate proof see rucALT 15948. This is Metamath 100 proof #22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	resdomq 15962	The set of rationals is strictly less equinumerous than the set of reals (ℝ strictly dominates ℚ). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1re 15963	There are at least aleph-one real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1irr 15964	There are at least aleph-one irrationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	cnso 15965	The complex numbers can be linearly ordered. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 Or ℂ
PART 6  ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY Here we introduce elementary number theory, in particular the elementary properties of divisibility and elementary prime number theory.
6.1  Elementary properties of divisibility
6.1.1  Irrationality of square root of 2
Theorem	sqrt2irrlem 15966	Lemma for sqrt2irr 15967. This is the core of the proof: if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd by the method of infinite descent (here implemented by strong induction). This is Metamath 100 proof #1. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by JV, 4-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘2) = (𝐴 / 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 2) ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	sqrt2irr 15967	The square root of 2 is irrational. See zsqrtelqelz 16471 for a generalization to all non-square integers. The proof's core is proven in sqrt2irrlem 15966, which shows that if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd. An older version of this proof was included in The Seventeen Provers of the World compiled by Freek Wiedijk. It is also the first of the "top 100" mathematical theorems whose formalization is tracked by Freek Wiedijk on his Formalizing 100 Theorems page at http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/ 15966. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∉ ℚ
Theorem	sqrt2re 15968	The square root of 2 exists and is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	sqrt2irr0 15969	The square root of 2 is an irrational number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
6.1.2  Some Number sets are chains of proper subsets
Theorem	nthruc 15970	The sequence ℕ, ℤ, ℚ, ℝ, and ℂ forms a chain of proper subsets. In each case the proper subset relationship is shown by demonstrating a number that belongs to one set but not the other. We show that zero belongs to ℤ but not ℕ, one-half belongs to ℚ but not ℤ, the square root of 2 belongs to ℝ but not ℚ, and finally that the imaginary number i belongs to ℂ but not ℝ. See nthruz 15971 for a further refinement. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((ℕ ⊊ ℤ ∧ ℤ ⊊ ℚ) ∧ (ℚ ⊊ ℝ ∧ ℝ ⊊ ℂ))
Theorem	nthruz 15971	The sequence ℕ, ℕ0, and ℤ forms a chain of proper subsets. In each case the proper subset relationship is shown by demonstrating a number that belongs to one set but not the other. We show that zero belongs to ℕ0 but not ℕ and minus one belongs to ℤ but not ℕ0. This theorem refines the chain of proper subsets nthruc 15970. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)
⊢ (ℕ ⊊ ℕ0 ∧ ℕ0 ⊊ ℤ)
6.1.3  The divides relation
Syntax	cdvds 15972	Extend the definition of a class to include the divides relation. See df-dvds 15973.
class ∥
Definition	df-dvds 15973*	Define the divides relation, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ∥ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑛 · 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
Theorem	divides 15974*	Define the divides relation. 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 means 𝑀 divides into 𝑁 with no remainder. For example, 3 ∥ 6 (ex-dvds 28829). As proven in dvdsval3 15976, 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0. See divides 15974 and dvdsval2 15975 for other equivalent expressions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑛 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsval2 15975	One nonzero integer divides another integer if and only if their quotient is an integer. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	dvdsval3 15976	One nonzero integer divides another integer if and only if the remainder upon division is zero, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0))
Theorem	dvdszrcl 15977	Reverse closure for the divisibility relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∥ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	dvdsmod0 15978	If a positive integer divides another integer, then the remainder upon division is zero. (Contributed by AV, 3-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁) → (𝑁 mod 𝑀) = 0)
Theorem	p1modz1 15979	If a number greater than 1 divides another number, the second number increased by 1 is 1 modulo the first number. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝑀) → ((𝐴 + 1) mod 𝑀) = 1)
Theorem	dvdsmodexp 15980	If a positive integer divides another integer, this other integer is equal to its positive powers modulo the positive integer. (Formerly part of the proof for fermltl 16494). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 19-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐴) → ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐴 mod 𝑁))
Theorem	nndivdvds 15981	Strong form of dvdsval2 15975 for positive integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐵 ∥ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nndivides 15982*	Definition of the divides relation for positive integers. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))
Theorem	moddvds 15983	Two ways to say 𝐴≡𝐵 (mod 𝑁), see also definition in [ApostolNT] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐵 mod 𝑁) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	modm1div 15984	An integer greater than one divides another integer minus one iff the second integer modulo the first integer is one. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 mod 𝑁) = 1 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	dvds0lem 15985	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with no antecedents. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 · 𝑀) = 𝑁) → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvds1lem 15986*	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with one antecedent. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 · 𝐽) = 𝐾 → (𝑍 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∥ 𝐾 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvds2lem 15987*	A lemma to assist theorems of ∥ with two antecedents. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ)) → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝑥 · 𝐼) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝑦 · 𝐾) = 𝐿) → (𝑍 · 𝑀) = 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼 ∥ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐾 ∥ 𝐿) → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	iddvds 15988	An integer divides itself. Theorem 1.1(a) in [ApostolNT] p. 14 (reflexive property of the divides relation). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 𝑁 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	1dvds 15989	1 divides any integer. Theorem 1.1(f) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 1 ∥ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvds0 15990	Any integer divides 0. Theorem 1.1(g) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 𝑁 ∥ 0)
Theorem	negdvdsb 15991	An integer divides another iff its negation does. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ -𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsnegb 15992	An integer divides another iff it divides its negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ -𝑁))
Theorem	absdvdsb 15993	An integer divides another iff its absolute value does. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (abs‘𝑀) ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsabsb 15994	An integer divides another iff it divides its absolute value. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ (abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	0dvds 15995	Only 0 is divisible by 0. Theorem 1.1(h) in [ApostolNT] p. 14. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (0 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
Theorem	dvdsmul1 15996	An integer divides a multiple of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑀 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsmul2 15997	An integer divides a multiple of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))
Theorem	iddvdsexp 15998	An integer divides a positive integer power of itself. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ∥ (𝑀↑𝑁))
Theorem	muldvds1 15999	If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	muldvds2 16000	If a product divides an integer, so does one of its factors. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐾 · 𝑀) ∥ 𝑁 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁))