Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 45901-46000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|
| Statement |
|---|
| |
| Theorem | pwtrrVD 45901 |
Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5419; see pwtrVD 45900 for the converse.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (Tr 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT 45902 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html
is a
Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into
the Metamath proof of suctrALT 45902 using completeusersproof, which is
verified by the Metamath program. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 45902 is a
form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction
proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6451 for the original
proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare,
12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALTVD 45903 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 45904. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALT 45904 |
If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a
subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 4742. This
theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 45903 using a
translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snsslVD 45905 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssl 45906. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssl 45906 |
If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's
element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the
right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 4741.
The proof of
this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 45905 using a tools
command file, translateMWO.cmd, by translating the proof into its
non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snelpwrVD 45907 |
Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 5411. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unipwrVD 45908 |
Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 45909. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | unipwr 45909 |
A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is
the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 5417. The proof of this theorem
was automatically generated from unipwrVD 45908 using a tools command file ,
translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual
deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2VD 45910 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 45911. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2 45911 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3916, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem
6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was
automatically generated from
sstrALT2VD 45910 using the command file
translate_without_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the
automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof
which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly
contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof
contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the
minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2VD 45912 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 45913. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2 45913 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctr 6451. The successor of a transitive
class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the
virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 45912 using the tools command file
translate_without_overwriting_minimize_excluding_duplicates.cmd .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elex2VD 45914* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2837. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elex22VD 45915* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex22 3474. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqsbc2VD 45916* |
Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc2 3801. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | zfregs2VD 45917* |
Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 9738. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | tpid3gVD 45918 |
Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 4729. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem1VD 45919* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 9617. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem2VD 45920* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 9618. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lpVD 45921 |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 9619. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| 21.45.7 Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction
with mmj2 assistance
|
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2VD 45922 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 506. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
| | qed:3,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))
|
The proof of simplbi2 506 was automatically derived from it.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | 3ornot23VD 45923 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 45586. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑
∧ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 5:3,4,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:2,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:5,6,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi1rVD 45924 |
Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 45587. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 8:7,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 9:1,8,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)) )
| | 12:6,11,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | bitr3VD 45925 |
Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 355. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑
↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜓
↔ 𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 4:3,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜑
↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
→ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3orbi123VD 45926 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 45588. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧
(𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 5:2,3,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:5,4,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 7:?: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))
| | 8:6,7,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) ↔
(𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒
↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨
𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃
∨ 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbc3orgVD 45927 |
Virtual deduction proof of the analogue of sbcor 3788 with three disjuncts.
The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 32:3: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)
↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 33:1,32,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1,33,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:5,7,?: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 19.21a3con13vVD 45928* |
Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 45610. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑
∧ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:2,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:2,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 6:1,4,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜑 )
| | 7:3,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:5,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 9:7,6,8,?: e222 45713 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 11:10:in2 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:11:in1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbirVD 45929 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbir 45556. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:1,2,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e32 45834 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbiriVD 45930 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 823. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:2,1,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e21 45806 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 7:4,6,?: e32 45834 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | rspsbc2VD 45931* |
Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 45611. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 4:1,3,?: e13 45824 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4,?: e13 45824 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 6:2,5,?: e23 45831 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpVD 45932 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1377. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 5:4,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 8:7,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 10:2,9,?: e01 45768 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
| | qed:6,11,?: e00 45844 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomVD 45933 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 45557. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜏
↔ 𝜃))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 8:7,2,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)))
| | qed:5,9,?: e00 45844 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomiVD 45934 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 45558. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcoreleleqVD 45935* |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 45612. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈
𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 =
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) )
| | 5:2,3,4,?: e111 45751 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 7:5,6: e11 45765 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbra2VD 45936* |
Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 3361. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 3:1,2,?: e00 45844 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 5:4,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | qed:3,5,?: e00 45844 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | tratrbVD 45937* |
Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 45613. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 7:5,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 8:2,7,4,?: e121 45733 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:2,6,8,?: e122 45730 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 11:6,7,10,?: e223 45712 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 14:12,13,?: e20 45803 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 16:7,15,?: e23 45831 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 17:6,16,?: e23 45831 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 20:18,19,?: e20 45803 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 21:3,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21,9,4,?: e121 45733 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝑥 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:22,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 24:4,23,?: e12 45800 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) )
| | 25:14,20,24,?: e222 45713 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 27:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨
𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 28:27,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
→ ∀𝑦(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 29:28,26: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 30:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 31:30,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥(Tr 𝐴
∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 32:31,29: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 33:32,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | qed:33: | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | al2imVD 45938 |
Virtual deduction proof of al2im 1846. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜒))
| | 4:2,3,?: e10 45771 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
→ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | syl5impVD 45939 |
Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 45589. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 45704 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓
→ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜓) )
| | 4:3,2,?: e21 45806 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 45708 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | idiVD 45940 |
Virtual deduction proof of idiALT 45555. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝜑
| | qed:1,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ 𝜑
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 |
| |
| Theorem | ancomstVD 45941 |
Closed form of ancoms 464. The following user's proof is completed by
invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all
remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 45848 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))
|
The proof of ancomst 470 is derived automatically from it.
(Contributed by
Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssralv2VD 45942* |
Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3977
for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 45608 is ssralv2VD 45942 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 45942.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 4:3,2: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
| | 14:12,13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | qed:16: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ordelordALTVD 45943 |
An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 6384 using
the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 9625. dford2 is a
weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it
need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the
Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 45614 is ordelordALTVD 45943
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
ordelordALTVD 45943 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program "MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (Ord 𝐴
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐴 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 6:4,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 7:6,6,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 15:14,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 16:4,15,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | 17:16,7: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐵 )
| | qed:17: | ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomVD 45944 |
If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union
of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 4158 is equncomVD 45944 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 45944.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomiVD 45945 |
Inference form of equncom 4158. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4159 is equncomiVD 45945 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 45945.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
| | qed:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALTVD 45946 |
A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 6447.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof
completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 45947 is sucidALTVD 45946
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
sucidALTVD 45946. This proof illustrates that
completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any
User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step
is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification
theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm.
completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a
conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each
step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction.
The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or
deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and
deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in
set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction
of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem
or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has
not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or
deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction,
then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or
deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a
semantic variation of the definition (axiom)
suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 6368, a
reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or
deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another
theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection
that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter
theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴
infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a
semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with
the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 9625.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALT 45947 |
A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived
from sucidALTVD 45946 using translate_without_overwriting.cmd and
minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidVD 45948 |
A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools
program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sucid 6447 is sucidVD 45948 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sucidVD 45948.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | imbi12VD 45949 |
Implication form of imbi12i 353. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 349 is imbi12VD 45949 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 45949.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜃) )
| | 9:2,8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | imbi13VD 45950 |
Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The
following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 45597
is imbi13VD 45950 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from imbi13VD 45950.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂)))) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcim2gVD 45951 |
Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication.
Similar to sbcimg 3786.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcim2g 45615 is sbcim2gVD 45951 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcim2gVD 45951.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)
↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒))) )
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcbiVD 45952 |
Implication form of sbcbii 3794.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcbi 45616 is sbcbiVD 45952 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcbiVD 45952.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | trsbcVD 45953* |
Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a
class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trsbc 45617 is trsbcVD 45953 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from trsbcVD 45953.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 5:1,2,3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 →
([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) )
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 20:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 22:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | 24:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 26:1,25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 27:23,26: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | qed:27: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | truniALTVD 45954* |
The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
truniALT 45618 is truniALTVD 45954 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from truniALTVD 45954.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 8:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:1,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:3,7,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 16:5,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥
▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∪ 𝐴 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ee33VD 45955 |
Non-virtual deduction form of e33 45810.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
ee33 45598 is ee33VD 45955 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from ee33VD 45955.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
| | h3:: | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | 6:2,5: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓
→ (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜂)))))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALTVD 45956* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual
deduction proof of trintALT 45957.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trintALT 45957 is trintALTVD 45956 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 45956.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 9:7,1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:7,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:10,3,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∩ 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALT 45957* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise
5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 45957 is an alternate proof of trint 5229.
trintALT 45957 is trintALTVD 45956 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 45956 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program
"MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | undif3VD 45958 |
The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual
deduction proof of undif3 4245.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
undif3 4245 is undif3VD 45958 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from undif3VD 45958.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥
∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 7:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧
(¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 12:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 13:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 14:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 17:9,16: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
→ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 18:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 21:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 23:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 27:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 33:22,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 34:28,32: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
→ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 36:: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 37:36,35: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 38:17,37: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐴))
| | 40:39: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 41:: | ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥
∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 42:40,41: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴))
| | 43:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
))
| | 44:43,42: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)
) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 45:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 46:45,44: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 47:4,38: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 48:46,47: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴
∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 49:48: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈
((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | qed:49: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶
∖ 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcssgVD 45959 |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4476.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcssg 4476 is sbcssgVD 45959 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcssgVD 45959.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
| | 110:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈
𝐷))
| | 12:1,110: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀
𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbingVD 45960 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbin 4399.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbin 4399 is csbingVD 45960 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbingVD 45960.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)
}
| | 20:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝐷)}
| | 30:1,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 3:1,30: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 13:5,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = {
𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem5VD 45961* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 45619.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem5 45619 is onfrALTlem5VD 45961 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 45961.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) = ∅)
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 7:2: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 11:7,10: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
| | 15:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
| | 16:15,14: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
≠ ∅))
| | 17:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 19:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 21:17,20: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 22:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌
∅)
| | 23:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
| | 24:21,23: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 26:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 27:25,26: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 28:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
/ 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 29:27,28: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 32:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅
))
| | 33:31,32: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅)
| | 34:2: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (
𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅)
| | 36:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦
(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔
∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 38:2,37: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅))
| | 39:35,38: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 40:16,39: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 41:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) /
𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:40,41: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢
([(𝑎 ∩
𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem4VD 45962* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 45620.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem4 45620 is onfrALTlem4VD 45962 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 45962.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋
𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 12:11,10: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
| | qed:13,12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem3VD 45963* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 45621.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem3 45621 is onfrALTlem3VD 45963 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 45963.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We 𝑥 )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 13:12,8: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)(
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ )
| | 20:17,19: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ≠ ∅) )
| | qed:16,20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2comtVD 45964 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 507.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
simplbi2comt 507 is simplbi2comtVD 45964 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 45964.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ (
𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒
) → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜑)) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem2VD 45965* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 45623.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem2 45623 is onfrALTlem2VD 45965 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 45965.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 7:4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Tr 𝑥 )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 14:10,12,13: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 31:28,30: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem1VD 45966* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 45625.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem1 45625 is onfrALTlem1VD 45966 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 45966.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅
) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(
𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTVD 45967 |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 45626.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALT 45626 is onfrALTVD 45967 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTVD 45967.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
(¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅)
| | 6:5,4,3: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
→ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ≠
∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ⊆
On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ≠
∅ )
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈
𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦
∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | qed:16: | ⊢ E Fr On
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ E Fr
On |
| |
| Theorem | csbeq2gVD 45968 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbeq2 3851.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbeq2 3851 is csbeq2gVD 45968 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbeq2gVD 45968.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]
𝐵 = 𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥
⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌
𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbsngVD 45969 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbsng 4665.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbsng 4665 is csbsngVD 45969 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from csbsngVD 45969.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦
= 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦
= 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 10:: | ⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥{𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | csbxpgVD 45970 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbxp 5751.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbxp 5751 is csbxpgVD 45970 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbxpgVD 45970.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 = 𝑤 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 10:5,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩) )
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 19:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 23:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦
(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 27:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]
∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 29:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
= {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 30:: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
| | 31:29,30: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 33:1,32: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 34:28,33: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))} )
| | 35:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 36:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)}
| | 37:35,36: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {𝑧
∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 38:34,37: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:38: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbresgVD 45971 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbres 5972.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbres 5972 is csbresgVD 45971 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbresgVD 45971.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V = V )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) )
| | 12:8,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)
= (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbrngVD 45972 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbrn 6204.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbrn 6204 is csbrngVD 45972 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbrngVD 45972.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨
𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ∀𝑥ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵}
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 17:13,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣
∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 18:: | ⊢ ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbima12gALTVD 45973 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbima12 6075.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbima12 6075 is csbima12gALTVD 45973 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbima12gALTVD 45973.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 9:5,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) =
ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ran
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:11: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbunigVD 45974 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbuni 4897.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbuni 4897 is csbunigVD 45974 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbunigVD 45974.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧
∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
)
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑥∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
𝐵)}
| | 17:1,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 18:1,17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 19:14,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:21: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪
𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbfv12gALTVD 45975 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbfv12 6931.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbfv12 6931 is csbfv12gALTVD 45975 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbfv12gALTVD 45975.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} = {
𝑦} )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦}) )
| | 8:6,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
= {𝑦}) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})
)
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦
}} )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “
{⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}}
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = {𝑦}}
| | 19:1,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 20:16,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 21:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | con5VD 45976 |
Virtual deduction proof of con5 45599.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
con5 45599 is con5VD 45976 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from con5VD 45976.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| |
| Theorem | relopabVD 45977 |
Virtual deduction proof of relopab 5801.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
relopab 5801 is relopabVD 45977 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from relopabVD 45977.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣
⟩ )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 ,
𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧
= ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 90:: | ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 91:90: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 92:: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦
| | 10:91,92: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢
, 𝑣⟩) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 15:14: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 150:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 151:150: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 152:: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥
| | 16:151,152: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 18:17: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑦∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧
= ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑥
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 25:24: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} ⊆
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 26:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 27:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)
| | 29:28: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 32:31: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))}
| | 320:25,32: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 33:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 34:: | ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣
⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑧 =
⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 38:37: | ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢
∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 39:38: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 40:320,39: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧
(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 41:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
}
| | 42:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))
}
| | 43:40,41,42: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)}
| | 44:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = (V × V)
| | 45:43,44: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ (V × V)
| | 46:28: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
| | 47:46: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩
∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)}
| | 48:45,47: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
| | qed:48: | ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ Rel
{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | 19.41rgVD 45978 |
Virtual deduction proof of 19.41rg 45627.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 19.41rg 45627
is 19.41rgVD 45978 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from 19.41rgVD 45978. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑
→ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜓 →
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
(∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 11:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀
𝑥𝜓) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → (
∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∃𝑥𝜑
→ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ((∃𝑥
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑
∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2pm13.193VD 45979 |
Virtual deduction proof of 2pm13.193 45629.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
2pm13.193 45629 is 2pm13.193VD 45979 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from 2pm13.193VD 45979. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 12:2,11: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 =
𝑣 )
| | 17:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝜑
)
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 20:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 =
𝑢 )
| | 21:19: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 23:22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 25:15,24: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | qed:13,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbimpgVD 45980 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbimpg 45631.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbimpg 45631
is hbimpgVD 45980 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbimpgVD 45980. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 15:14,12: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 16:10,15: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)))
| | 22:21,18: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢
((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbalgVD 45981 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbalg 45632.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbalg 45632
is hbalgVD 45981 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbalgVD 45981. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(𝜑
→ ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦∀𝑦(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:5,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(∀
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦
𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbexgVD 45982 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbexg 45633.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbexg 45633
is hbexgVD 45982 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbexgVD 45982. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 7:5: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 8:5,6,7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 9:8,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀
𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (¬
∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 18:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 22:8,21: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 23:14,22: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:23: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2eqVD 45983* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 45634 is ax6e2eqVD 45983 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2eqVD 45983.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢 )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢)))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑥
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 14:13,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) )
| | 140:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢))
| | 15:1,141: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢
)
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣
)
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢
)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 31:18,30: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndVD 45984* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2nd 45635 is ax6e2ndVD 45984 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndVD 45984.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 2:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 5:: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑦
(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑧 = 𝑣)
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑧𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 11:: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑧 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 120:11: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 13:9,10,120: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥
𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣
→ ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 18:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀
𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 →
∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 23:22: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 24:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 25:23,24: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 26:14,25: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:8,27: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | qed:29: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ (¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndeqVD 45985* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 45634 is ax6e2ndeqVD 45985 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndeqVD 45985.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
= 𝑢 )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑣 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑦
= 𝑣 )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
→ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:15: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 =
𝑦)
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃
𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 25:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 260:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 27:260: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 270:26,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 28:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 29:270,28: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 30:24,29: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 33:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 34:33: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) )
| | 35:34: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 37:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)
| | 38:32,36,37: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 40:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 41:40: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃
𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 42:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 43:39,41,42: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
))
| | 44:40,43: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:38,44: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2sb5ndVD 45986* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2sb5nd 45637 is 2sb5ndVD 45986 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from 2sb5ndVD 45986.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 3:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑢 / 𝑥]
∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀
𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 11:5,10: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 13:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]
𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 19:12,17: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 21:2,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)
↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 23:13: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 240:24: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑)))
| | 241:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 242:241,240: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 243:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑))) ↔ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))))
| | 25:242,243: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 26:: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:25,26: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2uasbanhVD 45987* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2uasbanh 45638 is 2uasbanhVD 45987 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2uasbanhVD 45987.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-May-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 100:1: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:100: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) )
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 9:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 102:101: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 103:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 104:102,103: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 11:7,10,104: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧
𝜓) )
| | 110:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑
∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 12:11,110: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 120:12: | ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 13:1,120: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) →
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 21:20: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 22:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 23:15,22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 27:21,26: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | qed:13,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | e2ebindVD 45988 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the
Metamath Proof Assistant. e2ebind 45640 is e2ebindVD 45988 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from e2ebindVD 45988.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑
))
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥
𝜑) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
| | 15:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | qed:14,15: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| 21.45.8 Virtual Deduction transcriptions of
textbook proofs
|
| |
| Theorem | sb5ALTVD 45989* |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20
Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2309, found in the "Answers to Starred
Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth
Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be
interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It
was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd,
which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof
Assistant. sb5ALT 45602 is sb5ALTVD 45989 without virtual deductions and
was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 45989.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦
∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
| | 11:101,10: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
)
| | 12:5,11: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | vk15.4jVD 45990 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 15
Excercise 4.f. found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 442
of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia
Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction
Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the
tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. vk15.4j 45605 is vk15.4jVD 45990
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from vk15.4jVD 45990. Step numbers greater than 25 are additional steps
necessary for the sequent calculus proof not contained in the
Fitch-style proof. Otherwise, step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧
¬ 𝜒))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏
))
| | h3:: | ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥¬
𝜃 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜃 )
| | 6:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ 𝜏 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 10:5: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 11:10,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 14:2,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 140:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜃
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜃)
| | 142:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜒)
| | 143:142: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 144:6,14,141,143: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 15:1: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓
∧ ¬ 𝜒))
| | 16:9: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 161:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 162:6,16,141,161: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 17:162: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥(
𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ 𝜒) )
| | 20:144: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜒
)
| | 21:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜒 )
| | 22:19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒
) )
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜓 )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ∃
𝑥¬ 𝜓 )
| | 240:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 241:20,24,141,240: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 25:241: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓
)
| | qed:25: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬
(∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ¬
∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | notnotrALTVD 45991 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 131). The same proof
may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style
axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 45606 is notnotrALTVD 45991
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from notnotrALTVD 45991. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 →
𝜑))
| | 5:3: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) )
| | 6:5,1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ ¬
𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | con3ALTVD 45992 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 (which is con3 154). The same proof may
also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic
proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 45607 is con3ALTVD 45992 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con3ALTVD 45992.
Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 7:6,5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 →
¬ 𝜑))
| | 10:8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)) |
| |
| 21.45.9 Theorems proved using conjunction-form
Virtual Deduction
|
| |
| Theorem | elpwgdedVD 45993 |
Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. Derived
from elpwg 4559. In form of VD deduction with 𝜑 and 𝜓 as
variable virtual hypothesis collections based on Mario Carneiro's
metavariable concept. elpwgded 45641 is elpwgdedVD 45993 using conventional
notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ V ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimp 45994 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. For the biconditional, see
sspwb 5416. The proof sspwimp 45994, using conventional notation, was
translated from virtual deduction form, sspwimpVD 45995, using a
translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpVD 45995 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools
program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's
Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimp 45994 is sspwimpVD 45995 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpVD 45995. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcf 45996 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimpcf 45996, using
conventional notation, was translated from its virtual deduction form,
sspwimpcfVD 45997, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan Sare,
13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcfVD 45997 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimpcf 45996 is sspwimpcfVD 45997 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpcfVD 45997.
The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcf 45998 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALTcf 45998, using
conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form,
suctrALTcfVD 45999, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan
Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcfVD 45999 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45646)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The
conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User
to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed
automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's
mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 45998
is suctrALTcfVD 45999 without virtual deductions and was derived
automatically from suctrALTcfVD 45999. The version of
completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:1,3,4: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
...... 𝑦 = 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝐴 )
| | 10:3,9: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 11:10,6: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) )
| | 15:8,12,14: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr suc 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
|
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| 21.45.10 Theorems with a VD proof in
conventional notation derived from a VD proof
|
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT3 46000 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 46000 is the
completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html 46000.
It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from
the VD proof exists. See wvd1 45646 for a description of Virtual
Deduction.
Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification
deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used
jaoded 45643). Unification deductions employ Mario
Carneiro's metavariable
concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem
(e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 5213) .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
Home
Hilbert Space Explorer
Users' Mathboxes