P. 460 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 45901-46000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	isosctrlem1ALT 45901	Lemma for isosctr 27142. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html 27142. As it is verified by the Metamath program, isosctrlem1ALT 45901 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html 45901. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π)
Theorem	iunconnlem2 45902*	The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnlem2 45902 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html 45902. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑣 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn)
Theorem	iunconnALT 45903*	The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnALT 45903 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html 45903. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn)
Theorem	sineq0ALT 45904	A complex number whose sine is zero is an integer multiple of π. The Virtual Deduction form of the proof is https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altvd.html. The Metamath form of the proof is sineq0ALT 45904. The Virtual Deduction proof is based on Mario Carneiro's revision of Norm Megill's proof of sineq0 26845. The Virtual Deduction proof is verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath form of the proof using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altro.html 26845 is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((sin‘𝐴) = 0 ↔ (𝐴 / π) ∈ ℤ))
21.44  Mathbox for Eric Schmidt
21.44.1  Miscellany
Theorem	rspesbcd 45905*	Restricted quantifier version of spesbcd 3830. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rext0 45906*	Nonempty existential quantification of a theorem is true. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
21.44.2  Study of dfbi1ALT
Theorem	dfbi1ALTa 45907	Version of dfbi1ALT 217 using ⊤ for step 2 and shortened using a1i 11, a2i 15, and con4i 115. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	simprimi 45908	Inference associated with simprim 167. Proved exactly as step 11 is obtained from step 4 in dfbi1ALTa 45907. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	dfbi1ALTb 45909	Further shorten dfbi1ALTa 45907 using simprimi 45908. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
21.44.3  Relation-preserving functions
Syntax	wrelp 45910	Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation-preserving property. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
wff 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-relp 45911*	Define the relation-preserving predicate. This is a viable notion of "homomorphism" corresponding to df-isom 6546. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	relpeq1 45912	Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐻 = 𝐺 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	relpeq2 45913	Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑇, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	relpeq3 45914	Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑇(𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	relpeq4 45915	Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐶, 𝐵)))
Theorem	relpeq5 45916	Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐶)))
Theorem	nfrelp 45917	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a relation-preserving function. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)
Theorem	relpf 45918	A relation-preserving function is a function. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	relprel 45919	A relation-preserving function preserves the relation. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 → (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷)))
Theorem	relpmin 45920	A preimage of a minimal element under a relation-preserving function is minimal. Essentially one half of isomin 7343. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐻 “ 𝐶) ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷})) = ∅))
Theorem	relpfrlem 45921*	Lemma for relpfr 45922. Proved without using the Axiom of Replacement. This is isofrlem 7346 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
Theorem	relpfr 45922	If the image of a set under a relation-preserving function is well-founded, so is the set. See isofr 7348 for a bidirectional statement. A more general version of Lemma I.9.9 of [Kunen2] p. 47. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
21.44.4  Orbits
Theorem	orbitex 45923	Orbits exist. Given a set 𝐴 and a function 𝐹, the orbit of 𝐴 under 𝐹 is the smallest set 𝑍 such that 𝐴 ∈ 𝑍 and 𝑍 is closed under 𝐹. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ ω) ∈ V
Theorem	orbitinit 45924	A set is contained in its orbit. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ ω))
Theorem	orbitcl 45925	The orbit under a function is closed under the function. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ ω) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ ω))
Theorem	orbitclmpt 45926	Version of orbitcl 45925 using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) “ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑍)
21.44.5  Well-founded sets
Theorem	trwf 45927	The class of well-founded sets is transitive. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 9-Sep-2025.)
⊢ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
Theorem	rankrelp 45928	The rank function preserves ∈. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ rank RelPres E , E (∪ (𝑅1 “ On), On)
Theorem	wffr 45929	The class of well-founded sets is well-founded. Lemma I.9.24(2) of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)
⊢ E Fr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
Theorem	trfr 45930	A transitive class well-founded by ∈ is a subclass of the class of well-founded sets. Part of Lemma I.9.21 of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	tcfr 45931	A set is well-founded if and only if its transitive closure is well-founded by ∈. This characterization of well-founded sets is that in Definition I.9.20 of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ E Fr (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	xpwf 45932	The Cartesian product of two well-founded sets is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	dmwf 45933	The domain of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → dom 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	rnwf 45934	The range of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ran 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	relwf 45935	A relation is a well-founded set iff its domain and range are. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ (dom 𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))))
21.44.6  Absoluteness in transitive models
Theorem	ralabso 45936*	Simplification of restricted quantification in a transitive class. When 𝜑 is quantifier-free, this shows that the formula ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦𝜑 is absolute for transitive models, which is a particular case of Lemma I.16.2 of [Kunen2] p. 95. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexabso 45937*	Simplification of restricted quantification in a transitive class. When 𝜑 is quantifier-free, this shows that the formula ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦𝜑 is absolute for transitive models, which is a particular case of Lemma I.16.2 of [Kunen2] p. 95. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	ralabsod 45938*	Deduction form of ralabso 45936. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	rexabsod 45939*	Deduction form of rexabso 45937. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	ralabsobidv 45940*	Formula-building lemma for proving absoluteness results. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexabsobidv 45941*	Formula-building lemma for proving absoluteness results. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	ssabso 45942*	The notion "𝑥 is a subset of 𝑦 " is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	disjabso 45943*	Disjointness is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	n0abso 45944*	Nonemptiness is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
21.44.7  Lemmas for showing axioms hold in models
Theorem	traxext 45945*	A transitive class models the Axiom of Extensionality ax-ext 2733. Lemma II.2.4(1) of [Kunen2] p. 111. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (Tr 𝑀 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	modelaxreplem1 45946*	Lemma for modelaxrep 45949. We show that 𝑀 is closed under taking subsets. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	modelaxreplem2 45947*	Lemma for modelaxrep 45949. We define a class 𝐹 and show that the antecedent of Replacement implies that 𝐹 is a function. We use Replacement (in the form of funex 7223) to show that 𝐹 exists. Then we show that, under our hypotheses, the range of 𝐹 is a member of 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	modelaxreplem3 45948*	Lemma for modelaxrep 45949. We show that the consequent of Replacement is satisfied with ran 𝐹 as the value of 𝑦. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))
Theorem	modelaxrep 45949*	Conditions which guarantee that a class models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5232. Similar to Lemma II.2.4(6) of [Kunen2] p. 111. The first two hypotheses are those in Kunen. The reason for the third hypothesis that our version of Replacement is different from Kunen's (which is zfrep6 5242). If we assumed Regularity, we could eliminate this extra hypothesis, since under Regularity, the empty set is a member of every non-empty transitive class. Note that, to obtain the relativization of an instance of Replacement to 𝑀, the formula ∀𝑦𝜑 would need to be replaced with ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀𝜒, where 𝜒 is 𝜑 with all quantifiers relativized to 𝑀. However, we can obtain this by using 𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝜒 for 𝜑 in this theorem, so it does establish that all instances of Replacement hold in 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜓 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
Theorem	ssclaxsep 45950*	A class that is closed under subsets models the Axiom of Separation ax-sep 5249. Lemma II.2.4(3) of [Kunen2] p. 111. Note that, to obtain the relativization of an instance of Separation to 𝑀, the formula 𝜑 would need to be replaced with its relativization to 𝑀. However, this new formula is a valid substitution for 𝜑, so this theorem does establish that all instances of Separation hold in 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑀 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	0elaxnul 45951*	A class that contains the empty set models the Null Set Axiom ax-nul 5260. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	pwclaxpow 45952*	Suppose 𝑀 is a transitive class that is closed under power sets intersected with 𝑀. Then, 𝑀 models the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5327. One direction of Lemma II.2.8 of [Kunen2] p. 113. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ 𝑀) ∈ 𝑀) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	prclaxpr 45953*	A class that is closed under the pairing operation models the Axiom of Pairing ax-pr 5391. Lemma II.2.4(4) of [Kunen2] p. 111. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝑀 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	uniclaxun 45954*	A class that is closed under the union operation models the Axiom of Union ax-un 7749. Lemma II.2.4(5) of [Kunen2] p. 111. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	sswfaxreg 45955*	A subclass of the class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9579. Lemma II.2.4(2) of [Kunen2] p. 111. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝑀 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))))
Theorem	omssaxinf2 45956*	A class that contains all ordinals up to and including ω models the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9635. The antecedent of this theorem is not enough to guarantee that the class models the alternate axiom ax-inf 9632. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝑀 ∧ ω ∈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))))
Theorem	omelaxinf2 45957*	A transitive class that contains ω models the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9635. Lemma II.2.11(7) of [Kunen2] p. 114. Kunen has the additional hypotheses that the Extensionality, Separation, Pairing, and Union axioms are true in 𝑀. This, apparently, is because Kunen's statement of the Axiom of Infinity uses the defined notions ∅ and suc, and these axioms guarantee that these notions are well-defined. When we state the axiom using primitives only, the need for these hypotheses disappears. The antecedent of this theorem is not enough to guarantee that the class models the alternate axiom ax-inf 9632. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ ω ∈ 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))))
Theorem	dfac5prim 45958*	dfac5 10200 expanded into primitives. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥((∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤∀𝑣((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑣 = 𝑤))))
Theorem	ac8prim 45959*	ac8 10563 expanded into primitives. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤∀𝑣((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑣 = 𝑤)))
Theorem	modelac8prim 45960*	If 𝑀 is a transitive class, then the following are equivalent. (1) Every nonempty set 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 of pairwise disjoint nonempty sets has a choice set in 𝑀. (2) The class 𝑀 models the Axiom of Choice, in the form ac8prim 45959. Lemma II.2.11(7) of [Kunen2] p. 114. Kunen has the additional hypotheses that the Extensionality, Separation, Pairing, and Union axioms are true in 𝑀. This, apparently, is because Kunen's statement of the Axiom of Choice uses defined notions, including ∅ and ∩, and these axioms guarantee that these notions are well-defined. When we state the axiom using primitives only, the need for these hypotheses disappears. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (Tr 𝑀 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑀 ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑣 = 𝑤)))))
21.44.8  The class of well-founded sets is a model for ZFC
Theorem	wfaxext 45961*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Extensionality ax-ext 2733. Part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112. This is the first of a series of theorems showing that all the axioms of ZFC hold in the class of well-founded sets, which we here denote by 𝑊. More precisely, for each axiom of ZFC, we obtain a provable statement if we restrict all quantifiers to 𝑊 (including implicit universal quantifiers on free variables). None of these proofs use the Axiom of Regularity. In particular, the Axiom of Regularity itself is proved to hold in 𝑊 without using Regularity. Further, the Axiom of Choice is used only in the proof that Choice holds in 𝑊. This has the consequence that any theorem of ZF (possibly proved using Regularity) can be proved, without using Regularity, to hold in 𝑊. This gives us a relative consistency result: If ZF without Regularity is consistent, so is ZF itself. Similarly, if ZFC without Regularity is consistent, so is ZFC itself. These consistency results are metatheorems and are part of Theorem II.2.13 of [Kunen2] p. 114. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Sep-2025.) (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	wfaxrep 45962*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5232. Actually, our statement is stronger, since it is an instance of Replacement only when all quantifiers in ∀𝑦𝜑 are relativized to 𝑊. Essentially part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112, but note that our Replacement is different from Kunen's. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))
Theorem	wfaxsep 45963*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Separation ax-sep 5249. Actually, our statement is stronger, since it is an instance of Separation only when all quantifiers in 𝜑 are relativized to 𝑊. Part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	wfaxnul 45964*	The class of well-founded sets models the Null Set Axiom ax-nul 5260. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	wfaxpow 45965*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axioms of Power Sets. Part of Corollary II.2.9 of [Kunen2] p. 113. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	wfaxpr 45966*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Pairing ax-pr 5391. Part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	wfaxun 45967*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Union ax-un 7749. Part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	wfaxreg 45968*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9579. Part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	wfaxinf2 45969*	The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9635. Part of Corollary II.2.12 of [Kunen2] p. 114. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))
Theorem	wfac8prim 45970*	The class of well-founded sets 𝑊 models the Axiom of Choice. Since the previous theorems show that all the ZF axioms hold in 𝑊, we may use any statement that ZF proves is equivalent to Choice to prove this. We use ac8prim 45959. Part of Corollary II.2.12 of [Kunen2] p. 114. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑊 ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑣 = 𝑤)))
21.44.9  Permutation models
Theorem	brpermmodel 45971	The membership relation in a permutation model. We use a permutation 𝐹 of the universe to define a relation 𝑅 that serves as the membership relation in our model. The conclusion of this theorem is Definition II.9.1 of [Kunen2] p. 148. All the axioms of ZFC except for Regularity hold in permutation models, and Regularity will be false if 𝐹 is chosen appropriately. Thus, permutation models can be used to show that Regularity does not follow from the other axioms (with the usual proviso that the axioms are consistent). (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	brpermmodelcnv 45972	Ordinary membership expressed in terms of the permutation model's membership relation. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅(◡𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	permaxext 45973*	The Axiom of Extensionality ax-ext 2733 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	permaxrep 45974*	The Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5232 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. Note that, to prove that an instance of Replacement holds in the model, 𝜑 would need have all instances of ∈ replaced with 𝑅. But this still results in an instance of this theorem, so we do establish that Replacement holds. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))
Theorem	permaxsep 45975*	The Axiom of Separation ax-sep 5249 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. Note that, to prove that an instance of Separation holds in the model, 𝜑 would need have all instances of ∈ replaced with 𝑅. But this still results in an instance of this theorem, so we do establish that Separation holds. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	permaxnul 45976*	The Null Set Axiom ax-nul 5260 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥
Theorem	permaxpow 45977*	The Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5327 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤𝑅𝑧 → 𝑤𝑅𝑥) → 𝑧𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	permaxpr 45978*	The Axiom of Pairing ax-pr 5391 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤𝑅𝑧)
Theorem	permaxun 45979*	The Axiom of Union ax-un 7749 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑅𝑥) → 𝑧𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	permaxinf2lem 45980*	Lemma for permaxinf2 45981. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (◡𝐹‘((𝐹‘𝑣) ∪ {𝑣}))), (◡𝐹‘∅)) “ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤𝑅𝑧 ↔ (𝑤𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))
Theorem	permaxinf2 45981*	The Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9635 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤𝑅𝑧 ↔ (𝑤𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))
Theorem	permac8prim 45982*	The Axiom of Choice ac8prim 45959 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.3 of [Kunen2] p. 149. Note that ax-ac 10530 requires Regularity for its derivation from the usual Axiom of Choice and does not necessarily hold in permutation models. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑤 𝑤𝑅𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑤𝑅𝑥) → (¬ 𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑤)))) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑤∀𝑣((𝑣𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑦) ↔ 𝑣 = 𝑤)))
Theorem	nregmodelf1o 45983	Define a permutation 𝐹 used to produce a model in which ax-reg 9579 is false. The permutation swaps ∅ and {∅} and leaves the rest of 𝑉 fixed. This is an example given after Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V
Theorem	nregmodellem 45984	Lemma for nregmodel 45985. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {∅})
Theorem	nregmodel 45985*	The Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9579 is false in the permutation model defined from 𝐹. Since the other axioms of ZFC hold in all permutation models (permaxext 45973 through permac8prim 45982), we can conclude that Regularity does not follow from those axioms, assuming ZFC is consistent. (If we could prove Regularity from the other axioms, we could prove it in the permutation model and thus obtain a contradiction with this theorem.) Since we also know that Regularity is consistent with the other axioms (wfaxext 45961 through wfac8prim 45970), Regularity is neither provable nor disprovable from the other axioms; i.e., it is independent of them. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	nregmodelaxext 45986*	The Axiom of Extensionality ax-ext 2733 is true in the permutation model defined from 𝐹. This theorem is an immediate consequence of the fact that ax-ext 2733 holds in all permutation models and is provided as an illustration. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
21.44.10  Isomorphism of finite ordinals and non-negative integers
Theorem	hashnna 45987	The ♯ function on ω preserves addition. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (♯‘(𝐴 +o 𝐵)) = ((♯‘𝐴) + (♯‘𝐵)))
Theorem	hashnnsuc 45988	The ♯ function on ω turns successor into adding 1. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (♯‘suc 𝐴) = ((♯‘𝐴) + 1))
Theorem	hashnnm 45989	The ♯ function on ω preserves multiplication. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (♯‘(𝐴 ·o 𝐵)) = ((♯‘𝐴) · (♯‘𝐵)))
Theorem	hashnnlt 45990	The ♯ function on ω preserves the ordering. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (♯‘𝐵) < (♯‘𝐴))
Theorem	hashnnltb 45991	The ♯ function on ω preserves the ordering. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (♯‘𝐴) < (♯‘𝐵)))
Theorem	hashomf1o 45992	The ♯ function yields a bijection from ω to ℕ0. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (♯ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0
Theorem	hashomiso 45993	The ♯ function yields an order isomorphism between ω and ℕ0. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 7-Jul-2026.)
⊢ (♯ ↾ ω) Isom E , < (ω, ℕ0)
21.44.11  Hereditarily finite sets
Theorem	hfpr 45994	A pair whose members are hereditarily finite sets is a hereditarily finite set. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HF ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HF ) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ HF )
Theorem	hfxp 45995	The Cartesian product of two hereditarily finite sets is a hereditarily finite set. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HF ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HF ) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ HF )
Theorem	hfdm 45996	The domain of a hereditarily finite set is hereditarily finite. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HF → dom 𝐴 ∈ HF )
Theorem	hfrn 45997	The range of a hereditarily finite set is hereditarily finite. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HF → ran 𝐴 ∈ HF )
Theorem	hfrel 45998	A relation is a hereditarily finite set iff its domain and range are. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ HF ↔ (dom 𝑅 ∈ HF ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ HF )))
Theorem	omhf 45999	Finite ordinals are hereditarily finite sets. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ HF )
Theorem	omsshf 46000	The class of finite ordinals is included in the class of hereditarily finite sets. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Sep-2026.)
⊢ ω ⊆ HF