P. 460 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

even3prm2 45901

If an even number is the sum of three prime numbers, one of the prime numbers must be 2. (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 + 𝑄) + 𝑅)) → (𝑃 = 2 ∨ 𝑄 = 2 ∨ 𝑅 = 2))

Theorem

mogoldbblem 45902*

Lemma for mogoldbb 45967. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℙ) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ (𝑁 + 2) = ((𝑃 + 𝑄) + 𝑅)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))

21.43.13.9  Perfect Number Theorem (revised)

Theorem

perfectALTVlem1 45903

Lemma for perfectALTV 45905. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Odd )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 σ ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)) = (2 · ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) ∈ ℕ ∧ ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐵 / ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1)) ∈ ℕ))

Theorem

perfectALTVlem2 45904

Lemma for perfectALTV 45905. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Odd )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 σ ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)) = (2 · ((2↑𝐴) · 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 = ((2↑(𝐴 + 1)) − 1)))

Theorem

perfectALTV 45905*

The Euclid-Euler theorem, or Perfect Number theorem. A positive even integer 𝑁 is a perfect number (that is, its divisor sum is 2𝑁) if and only if it is of the form 2↑(𝑝 − 1) · (2↑𝑝 − 1), where 2↑𝑝 − 1 is prime (a Mersenne prime). (It follows from this that 𝑝 is also prime.) This is Metamath 100 proof #70. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ((1 σ 𝑁) = (2 · 𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℤ (((2↑𝑝) − 1) ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 = ((2↑(𝑝 − 1)) · ((2↑𝑝) − 1)))))

21.43.14  Number theory (extension 2)

21.43.14.1  Fermat pseudoprimes

"In number theory, the Fermat pseudoprimes make up the most important class of pseudoprimes that come from Fermat's little theorem ... [which] states that if p is prime and a is coprime to p, then a^(p-1)-1 is divisible by p [see fermltl 16656].

For an integer a > 1, if a composite integer x divides a^(x-1)-1, then x is called a Fermat pseudoprime to base a. In other words, a composite integer is a Fermat pseudoprime to base a if it successfully passes the Fermat primality test for the base a. The false statement [see nfermltl2rev 45925] that all numbers that pass the Fermat primality test for base 2, are prime, is called the Chinese hypothesis.", see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime 45925, 29-May-2023.

Syntax

cfppr 45906

Extend class notation with the Fermat pseudoprimes.

class FPPr

Definition

df-fppr 45907*

Define the function that maps a positive integer to the set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base of this positive integer. Since Fermat pseudoprimes shall be composite (positive) integers, they must be nonprime integers greater than or equal to 4 (we cannot use 𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∉ ℙ because 𝑥 = 1 would fulfil this requirement, but should not be regarded as "composite" integer). (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2023.)

⊢ FPPr = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ 𝑥 ∥ ((𝑛↑(𝑥 − 1)) − 1))})

Theorem

fppr 45908*

The set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ( FPPr ‘𝑁) = {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ 𝑥 ∥ ((𝑁↑(𝑥 − 1)) − 1))})

Theorem

fpprmod 45909*

The set of Fermat pseudoprimes to the base 𝑁, expressed by a modulo operation instead of the divisibility relation. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ( FPPr ‘𝑁) = {𝑥 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∣ (𝑥 ∉ ℙ ∧ ((𝑁↑(𝑥 − 1)) mod 𝑥) = 1)})

Theorem

fpprel 45910

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ ∧ ((𝑁↑(𝑋 − 1)) mod 𝑋) = 1)))

Theorem

fpprbasnn 45911

The base of a Fermat pseudoprime is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

fpprnn 45912

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

fppr2odd 45913

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2 is odd. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2) → 𝑋 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

11t31e341 45914

341 is the product of 11 and 31. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (;11 · ;31) = ;;341

Theorem

2exp340mod341 45915

Eight to the eighth power modulo nine is one. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((2↑;;340) mod ;;341) = 1

Theorem

341fppr2 45916

341 is the (smallest) Poulet number (Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ;;341 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2)

Theorem

4fppr1 45917

4 is the (smallest) Fermat pseudoprime to the base 1. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ 4 ∈ ( FPPr ‘1)

Theorem

8exp8mod9 45918

Eight to the eighth power modulo nine is one. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((8↑8) mod 9) = 1

Theorem

9fppr8 45919

9 is the (smallest) Fermat pseudoprime to the base 8. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ 9 ∈ ( FPPr ‘8)

Theorem

dfwppr 45920

Alternate definition of a weak pseudoprime 𝑋, which fulfils (𝑁↑𝑋)≡𝑁 (modulo 𝑋), see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime, 29-May-2023. (Contributed by AV, 31-May-2023.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 ∥ ((𝑁↑𝑋) − 𝑁)))

Theorem

fpprwppr 45921

A Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 is a weak pseudoprime (see Wikipedia "Fermat pseudoprime", 29-May-2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_pseudoprime. (Contributed by AV, 31-May-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) → ((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋))

Theorem

fpprwpprb 45922

An integer 𝑋 which is coprime with an integer 𝑁 is a Fermat pseudoprime to the base 𝑁 iff it is a weak pseudoprime to the base 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ((𝑋 gcd 𝑁) = 1 → (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘𝑁) ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘4) ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝑁↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = (𝑁 mod 𝑋)))))

Theorem

fpprel2 45923

An alternate definition for a Fermat pseudoprime to the base 2. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2023.)

⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ( FPPr ‘2) ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑋 ∉ ℙ) ∧ ((2↑𝑋) mod 𝑋) = 2))

Theorem

nfermltl8rev 45924

Fermat's little theorem with base 8 reversed is not generally true: There is an integer 𝑝 (for example 9, see 9fppr8 45919) so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 8↑𝑝≡8 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((8↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (8 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

Theorem

nfermltl2rev 45925

Fermat's little theorem with base 2 reversed is not generally true: There is an integer 𝑝 (for example 341, see 341fppr2 45916) so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 2↑𝑝≡2 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((2↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (2 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

Theorem

nfermltlrev 45926*

Fermat's little theorem reversed is not generally true: There are integers 𝑎 and 𝑝 so that "𝑝 is prime" does not follow from 𝑎↑𝑝≡𝑎 (mod 𝑝). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2023.)

⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3) ¬ (((𝑎↑𝑝) mod 𝑝) = (𝑎 mod 𝑝) → 𝑝 ∈ ℙ)

21.43.14.2  Goldbach's conjectures

According to Wikipedia ("Goldbach's conjecture", 20-Jul-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture) "Goldbach's conjecture ... states: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes." "It is also known as strong, even or binary Goldbach conjecture, to distinguish it from a weaker conjecture, known ... as the _Goldbach's weak conjecture_, the _odd Goldbach conjecture_, or the _ternary Goldbach conjecture_. This weak conjecture asserts that all odd numbers greater than 7 are the sum of three odd primes.". In the following, the terms "binary Goldbach conjecture" resp. "ternary Goldbach conjecture" will be used (following the terminology used in [Helfgott] p. 2), because there are a strong and a weak version of the ternary Goldbach conjecture. The term _Goldbach partition_ is used for a sum of two resp. three (odd) primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.

Using the definition of a _Goldbach number_, which is "a positive even integer that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes." (see df-gbe 45930), "another form of the statement of Goldbach's conjecture is that all even integers greater than 4 are Goldbach numbers.". 4 is not a Goldbach number, but it is the sum of two primes (2 and 2) nevertheless. sbgoldbalt 45963 shows that both forms are equivalent.

Hint (see Wikipedia, ("Goldbach's weak conjecture", 26-Jul-2020, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 45963): "Some state the [weak] conjecture as 'Every odd number greater than 7 can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.' This version excludes 7 = 2+2+3 because this requires the even prime 2. On odd numbers larger than 7 it is slightly stronger as it also excludes sums like 17 = 2+2+13, which are allowed in the other formulation. Helfgott's proof [see below] covers both versions of the conjecture. Like the other formulation, this one also immediately follows from Goldbach's strong conjecture." The definition of "weak odd Goldbach numbers", see df-gbow 45931, is the basis for "the other formulation", to formulate the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture. Alternately, df-gbo 45932 provides a definition of "(strong) odd Goldbach numbers" allowing for stating the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture. In literature, the term "Goldbach number" is used for "even Goldbach numbers" (according to definition df-gbe 45930), whereas there seems to be no explicit names and definitions for "odd Goldbach numbers". Since there are more theorems for "strong odd Goldbach numbers", "odd Goldbach numbers" refers to "strong odd Goldbach numbers" in the following. Otherwise, the term "weak odd Goldbach numbers" is explicitly used.

In contrast to the two versions of the binary Goldbach conjecture, the two versions of the ternary Goldbach conjecture are different not only for small numbers, but the strong version excludes cases like a=2+2+b in general, e.g., 23=2+2+19. Therefore, it seems to be more difficult to prove the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture than the weak version, because there are fewer possible partitions available.

Although the binary Goldbach conjecture is not proven yet, the ternary Goldbach conjecture was proven by Harald Helfgott in 2014 (the weak as well as the strong version, see Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2). It would be great if this proof can be formalized with Metamath (although it is not in the Metamath 100 list). This section should be a starting point for this.

The main problem will be to provide means to express the results from checking "small" numbers (performed with a computer): numbers up to about 4 x 10^18 for the binary Goldbach conjecture (see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042, called "even Goldbach conjecture" here) resp. about 9 x 10^30 for the ternary Goldbach conjecture (see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4) or 8 x 10^26 (see theorem 2.1 in [OeSilva] p. 2057, called "odd Goldbach conjecture" here). Maybe each of the results must be provided as theorem, like 6gbe 45953, which would be quite a lot...

As proposed in the Google group discussion https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/DOXS4pg0h8w , this problem could be solved by using a reflective verifier or adding a concept of verification certificates that can be added into the Metamath databases as a reference. To sidestep the computation problem for now, the corresponding theorems are temporarily provided as axioms, see ax-bgbltosilva 45992, ax-hgprmladder 45996 and ax-tgoldbachgt 45993.

Summary/glossary:

Term	Synonyms	Label fragment	Definition/Theorem	Remarks
binary Goldbach partition	simply "Goldbach partition"			A pair of primes (p,q) that sum to an even integer 2n=p+q	See https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachPartition.html 45993
weak Goldbach partition		gbpart		A sum of two resp. three primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.
Goldbach partition		gbpart		A sum of two resp. three odd primes resulting in an even resp. odd number without further specialization.
even Goldbach number	simply "Goldbach number"	gbe	df-gbe 45930	A positive even integer that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes.	See https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachNumber.html 45930
weak odd Goldbach number		gbow	df-gbow 45931	A positive odd integer that can be expressed as the sum of three primes.
odd Goldbach number	strong odd Goldbach number	gbo	df-gbo 45932	A positive odd integer that can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.
strong binary Goldbach conjecture	"the" Goldbach conjecture" [*1], even Goldbach conjecture [*2]	sbgoldb		Every even integer greater than 4 can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes.	[*1] Equation (1) in [ApostolNT] p. 304 or [*2] introduction of [OeSilva] p. 2033.
binary Goldbach conjecture[*1][*3]	strong Goldbach conjecture [*1], even Goldbach conjecture [*1], or simply "the Goldbach conjecture" [*1][*2]	bgoldb, b	sbgoldbb 45964	Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.	See [*1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture 45964, [*2] statement in [ApostolNT] p. 9 or [*3] section 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 2.
weak ternary Goldbach conjecture	Goldbach's weak conjecture [*1], odd Goldbach conjecture [*1][*3], ternary Goldbach conjecture [*2], ternary Goldbach problem[*1], three-primes problem [*1][*2]	wtgoldb, wt	stgoldbwt 45958, sbgoldbwt 45959	Every odd number greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes.	See [*1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture, 45959 [*2] section 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 2 or [*3] section 2.4 in [OeSilva] p. 2057.
ternary Goldbach conjecture	strong ternary Goldbach conjecture, the "weak" Goldbach conjecture	tgoldb, stgoldb, st	sbgoldbst 45960	Every odd number greater than 7 can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes.	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 45960, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 45960 or section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 71.
Goldbach's original conjecture (modern version)	the "ternary" Goldbach conjecture	mogoldb, m	sbgoldbm 45966	Every integer greater than 5 can be written as the sum of three primes.	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 45966, and https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 45966
Goldbach's original conjecture (original version)		ogoldb, o	sbgoldbo 45969	Every integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of three "primes" (considered the number 1 to be a "prime").	See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_weak_conjecture 45969, and https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html 45969

Syntax

cgbe 45927

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of even numbers which have a Goldbach partition.

class GoldbachEven

Syntax

cgbow 45928

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three primes.

class GoldbachOddW

Syntax

cgbo 45929

Extend the definition of a class to include the set of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes.

class GoldbachOdd

Definition

df-gbe 45930*

Define the set of (even) Goldbach numbers, which are positive even integers that can be expressed as the sum of two odd primes. By this definition, the binary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachEven = {𝑧 ∈ Even ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑧 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))}

Definition

df-gbow 45931*

Define the set of weak odd Goldbach numbers, which are positive odd integers that can be expressed as the sum of three primes. By this definition, the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachOddW = {𝑧 ∈ Odd ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)}

Definition

df-gbo 45932*

Define the set of (strong) odd Goldbach numbers, which are positive odd integers that can be expressed as the sum of three odd primes. By this definition, the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture can be expressed as ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ). (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ GoldbachOdd = {𝑧 ∈ Odd ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}

Theorem

isgbe 45933*

The predicate "is an even Goldbach number". An even Goldbach number is an even integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as a sum of two odd primes. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Even ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑍 = (𝑝 + 𝑞))))

Theorem

isgbow 45934*

The predicate "is a weak odd Goldbach number". A weak odd Goldbach number is an odd integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as a sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑍 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))

Theorem

isgbo 45935*

The predicate "is an odd Goldbach number". An odd Goldbach number is an odd integer having a Goldbach partition, i.e. which can be written as sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd ↔ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑍 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))

Theorem

gbeeven 45936

An even Goldbach number is even. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 𝑍 ∈ Even )

Theorem

gbowodd 45937

A weak odd Goldbach number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 𝑍 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

gbogbow 45938

A (strong) odd Goldbach number is a weak Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW )

Theorem

gboodd 45939

An odd Goldbach number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ Odd )

Theorem

gbepos 45940

Any even Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbowpos 45941

Any weak odd Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbopos 45942

Any odd Goldbach number is positive. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 𝑍 ∈ ℕ)

Theorem

gbegt5 45943

Any even Goldbach number is greater than 5. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 5 < 𝑍)

Theorem

gbowgt5 45944

Any weak odd Goldbach number is greater than 5. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 5 < 𝑍)

Theorem

gbowge7 45945

Any weak odd Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 7. Because of 7gbow 45954, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOddW → 7 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gboge9 45946

Any odd Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 9. Because of 9gbo 45956, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachOdd → 9 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gbege6 45947

Any even Goldbach number is greater than or equal to 6. Because of 6gbe 45953, this bound is strict. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (𝑍 ∈ GoldbachEven → 6 ≤ 𝑍)

Theorem

gbpart6 45948

The Goldbach partition of 6. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 6 = (3 + 3)

Theorem

gbpart7 45949

The (weak) Goldbach partition of 7. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 7 = ((2 + 2) + 3)

Theorem

gbpart8 45950

The Goldbach partition of 8. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 8 = (3 + 5)

Theorem

gbpart9 45951

The (strong) Goldbach partition of 9. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 9 = ((3 + 3) + 3)

Theorem

gbpart11 45952

The (strong) Goldbach partition of 11. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ;11 = ((3 + 3) + 5)

Theorem

6gbe 45953

6 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 6 ∈ GoldbachEven

Theorem

7gbow 45954

7 is a weak odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 7 ∈ GoldbachOddW

Theorem

8gbe 45955

8 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 8 ∈ GoldbachEven

Theorem

9gbo 45956

9 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ 9 ∈ GoldbachOdd

Theorem

11gbo 45957

11 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ;11 ∈ GoldbachOdd

Theorem

stgoldbwt 45958

If the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))

Theorem

sbgoldbwt 45959*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))

Theorem

sbgoldbst 45960*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))

Theorem

sbgoldbaltlem1 45961

Lemma 1 for sbgoldbalt 45963: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, one of the prime summands must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ Odd ))

Theorem

sbgoldbaltlem2 45962

Lemma 2 for sbgoldbalt 45963: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, the primes must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑄 ∈ Odd )))

Theorem

sbgoldbalt 45963*

An alternate (related to the original) formulation of the binary Goldbach conjecture: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sbgoldbb 45964*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sgoldbeven3prm 45965*

If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then an even integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes: Since (𝑁 − 2) is even iff 𝑁 is even, there would be primes 𝑝 and 𝑞 with (𝑁 − 2) = (𝑝 + 𝑞), and therefore 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 2). (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 6 ≤ 𝑁) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))

Theorem

sbgoldbm 45966*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

mogoldbb 45967*

If the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture is valid, the (weak) binary Goldbach conjecture also holds. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))

Theorem

sbgoldbmb 45968*

The strong binary Goldbach conjecture and the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

sbgoldbo 45969*

If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of three "primes" with regarding 1 to be a prime (as Goldbach did). Original text: "Es scheint wenigstens, dass eine jede Zahl, die groesser ist als 2, ein aggregatum trium numerorum primorum sey." (Goldbach, 1742). (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ({1} ∪ ℙ)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3)∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑃 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))

Theorem

nnsum3primes4 45970*

4 is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))

Theorem

nnsum4primes4 45971*

4 is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))

Theorem

nnsum3primesprm 45972*

Every prime is "the sum of at most 3" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)

⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesprm 45973*

Every prime is "the sum of at most 4" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum3primesgbe 45974*

Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesgbe 45975*

Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum3primesle9 45976*

Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesle9 45977*

Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesodd 45978*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 5 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘6) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesoddALTV 45979*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 7 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘8) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

evengpop3 45980*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOddW 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))

Theorem

evengpoap3 45981*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOdd 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))

Theorem

nnsum4primeseven 45982*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

nnsum4primesevenALTV 45983*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

wtgoldbnnsum4prm 45984*

If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be less than or equal to 4. See corollary 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 4. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

stgoldbnnsum4prm 45985*

If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

bgoldbnnsum3prm 45986*

If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 3 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑_m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))

Theorem

bgoldbtbndlem1 45987

Lemma 1 for bgoldbtbnd 45991: the odd numbers between 7 and 13 (exclusive) are odd Goldbach numbers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (7[,);13)) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )

Theorem

bgoldbtbndlem2 45988*

Lemma 2 for bgoldbtbnd 45991. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘(𝐼 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))

Theorem

bgoldbtbndlem3 45989*

Lemma 3 for bgoldbtbnd 45991. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ 4 < 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))

Theorem

bgoldbtbndlem4 45990*

Lemma 4 for bgoldbtbnd 45991. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑋 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))

Theorem

bgoldbtbnd 45991*

If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to an integer 𝑁, and there is a series ("ladder") of primes with a difference of at most 𝑁 up to an integer 𝑀, then the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to 𝑀, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4 with N = 4 x 10^18, taken from [OeSilva], and M = 8.875 x 10^30. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑀) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))

Axiom

ax-bgbltosilva 45992

The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all even numbers less than or equal to 4x10^18, see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ (4 · (;10↑;18))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven )

Axiom

ax-tgoldbachgt 45993*

Temporary duplicate of tgoldbachgt 33276, provided as "axiom" as long as this theorem is in the mathbox of Thierry Arnoux: Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)

⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))

Theorem

tgoldbachgtALTV 45994*

Variant of Thierry Arnoux's tgoldbachgt 33276 using the symbols Odd and GoldbachOdd: The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for large odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers greater than a fixed 𝑚). This is proven by Helfgott (see section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 70) for 𝑚 = 10^27. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2022.)

⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))

Theorem

bgoldbachlt 45995*

The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small even numbers (i.e. for all even numbers less than or equal to a fixed big 𝑚). This is verified for m = 4 x 10^18 by Oliveira e Silva, see ax-bgbltosilva 45992. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((4 · (;10↑;18)) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))

Axiom

ax-hgprmladder 45996

There is a partition ("ladder") of primes from 7 to 8.8 x 10^30 with parts ("rungs") having lengths of at least 4 and at most N - 4, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ_≥‘3)∃𝑓 ∈ (RePart‘𝑑)(((𝑓‘0) = 7 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = ;13 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑑) = (;89 · (;10↑;29))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑑)((𝑓‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖)) < ((4 · (;10↑;18)) − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖))))

Theorem

tgblthelfgott 45997

The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all odd numbers less than 8.8 x 10^30 (actually 8.875694 x 10^30, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4, using bgoldbachlt 45995, ax-hgprmladder 45996 and bgoldbtbnd 45991. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < (;88 · (;10↑;29))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )

Theorem

tgoldbachlt 45998*

The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers less than a fixed big 𝑚 greater than 8 x 10^30). This is verified for m = 8.875694 x 10^30 by Helfgott, see tgblthelfgott 45997. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((8 · (;10↑;30)) < 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))

Theorem

tgoldbach 45999

The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid. Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2. This follows from tgoldbachlt 45998 and ax-tgoldbachgt 45993. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd )

21.43.15  Graph theory (extension)

21.43.15.1  Isomorphic graphs

In the following, a general definition of the isomorphy relation for graphs and specializations for simple hypergraphs (isomushgr 46008) and simple pseudographs (isomuspgr 46016) are provided. The latter corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3). It is shown that the isomorphy relation for graphs is an equivalence relation (isomgrref 46017, isomgrsym 46018, isomgrtr 46021). Fianlly, isomorphic graphs with different representations are studied (strisomgrop 46022, ushrisomgr 46023).

Maybe more important than graph isomorphy is the notion of graph isomorphism, which can be defined as in df-grisom 46002. Then 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) resp. 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) ≠ ∅. Notice that there can be multiple isomorphisms between two graphs (let ⟨{𝐴, 𝐵}, {{𝐴, 𝐵}}⟩ and ⟨{{𝑀, 𝑁}, {{𝑀, 𝑁}}⟩ be two graphs with two vertices and one edge, then 𝐴 ↦ 𝑀, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑁 and 𝐴 ↦ 𝑁, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑀 are two different isomorphisms between these graphs).

Another approach could be to define a category of graphs (there are maybe multiple ones), where graph morphisms are couples consisting in a function on vertices and a function on edges with required compatibilities, as used in the definition of GrIsom. And then, a graph isomorphism is defined as an isomorphism in the category of graphs (something like "GraphIsom = ( Iso ` GraphCat )" ). Then general category theory theorems could be used, e.g., to show that graph isomorphy is an equivalence relation.

Syntax

cgrisom 46000

Extend class notation to include the graph ispmorphisms.

class GrIsom