HomeTheorem List (p. 414 of 509)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 414 of 509) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31407) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31408-32930) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32931-50831) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43fsv1snlem 41301* | Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43fsv1sn 41302* | Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs32fvaN 41303* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: consolidate uses of lhpmat 40911 here and elsewhere, and presence/absence of 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) term. Also, why can proof be shortened with cdleme27cl 41247? What is difference from cdlemefs27cl 41294? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs32fva1 41304* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs31fv1 41305* |
Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄).
TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 39840
3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT.
***END OF VALUE AT ATOM STUFF TO REPLACE
ONES BELOW***
"cdleme3xsn1aw" decreased using "cdlemefs32sn1aw"
"cdleme32sn1aw" decreased from 3302 to 36 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw".
"cdleme32sn2aw" decreased from 1687 to 26 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw".
"cdleme32snaw" decreased from 376 to 375 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw".
"cdleme32snaw" decreased from 375 to 368 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw".
"cdleme35sn3a" decreased from 547 to 523 using "cdleme43frv1sn".
(Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefr44 41306* | Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefr45 instead? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs44 41307* | Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefs45 41310 instead TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefr45 41308* | Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefr45e 41309* | Explicit expansion of cdlemefr45 41308. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefr45 41308 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs45 41310* | Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs45ee 41311* | Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 41310. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 41310 uses? Should ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) be assigned to a hypothesis letter? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemefs45eN 41312* | Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 41310. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 41310 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32sn1awN 41313* | Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme41sn3a 41314* | Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32sn2awN 41315* | Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32snaw 41316* | Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32snb 41317* | Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32fva 41318* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32fva1 41319* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32fvaw 41320* | Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32fvcl 41321* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32a 41322* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32b 41323* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑌) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32c 41324* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32d 41325* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32e 41326* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32f 41327* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme32le 41328* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35a 41329 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35fnpq 41330 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ 𝐹 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35b 41331 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35c 41332 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) = (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35d 41333 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35e 41334 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35f 41335 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35g 41336 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊))) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35h 41337 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35h2 41338 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35sn2aw 41339* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line case; compare cdleme32sn2awN 41315. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme35sn3a 41340* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme36a 41341 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑡 ∨ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme36m 41342 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐶) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme37m 41343 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐶 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme38m 41344 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme38n 41345 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO shorter if proved directly from cdleme36m 41342 and cdleme37m 41343? (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme39a 41346 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 41345 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 41313. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐺 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme39n 41347 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 41345 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 41313. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme40m 41348* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT Use proof idea from cdleme32sn1awN 41313. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme40n 41349* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO get rid of '.<' class? (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, < ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme40v 41350* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Change bound variables in ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 (but we use ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 for convenience since we have its hypotheses available). (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme40w 41351* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Apply cdleme40v 41350 bound variable change to ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42a 41352 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42c 41353 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ≤ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42d 41354 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme41sn3aw 41355* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is different on and off the 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme41sn4aw 41356* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for on and off 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme41snaw 41357* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for combined cases; compare cdleme32snaw 41316. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme41fva11 41358* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is one-to-one for r in W (r an atom not under w). TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42b 41359* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42e 41360* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42f 41361* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42g 41362* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42h 41363* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42i 41364* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42k 41365* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Since F ' S =/= F'R when S =/= R (i.e. 1-1); then ( ( F ' R ) .\/ ( F ' S ) ) is 2-dim therefore = ( ( F ' R ) .\/ V ) by cdleme42i 41364 and ps-1 40358 TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42ke 41366* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42keg 41367* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42ke 41366 and even combine with it? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42mN 41368* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme42mgN 41369* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42mN 41368? Combine with cdleme42mN 41368? (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43aN 41370 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 penultimate line: g(f(r)) = (p v q) ^ (g(s) v v1). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ 𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43bN 41371 | Lemma for Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. g(s) is an atom not under w. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43cN 41372 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 last line: r v g(s) = r v v2. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme43dN 41373 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 116 2nd line: f(r) v s = f(r) v f(g(s)). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑍 ∨ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme46f2g2 41374 | Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. TODO What other conversion theorems would be reused? e.g. cdlemeg46nlpq 41398? Find other hlatjcom 40249 uses giving 𝑄 ∨ 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme46f2g1 41375 | Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme17d2 41376* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. 𝐹, 𝐺 represent f(s), fs(p) respectively. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme17d3 41377* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme17d4 41378* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme17d 41379* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48fv 41380* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41322? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48fvg 41381* | Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition in cdleme48fv 41380. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41322? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Can this be proved more directly by eliminating 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 in earlier theorems? Should this replace uses of cdleme48fv 41380? (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme46fvaw 41382* | Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48bw 41383* | TODO: fix comment. TODO: Remove unnecessary 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 from cdleme48bw 41383 cdlemeg46c 41394 cdlemeg46fvaw 41397 cdlemeg46rgv 41409 cdlemeg46gfv 41411? cdleme48d 41416? and possibly others they affect. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme48b 41384* | TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑊) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme46frvlpq 41385* | Show that (𝐹‘𝑆) is not under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑆 isn't. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme46fsvlpq 41386* | Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 is. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46fvcl 41387* | TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cdleme4gfv 41388* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41322? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Would an antecedent transformer like cdleme46f2g2 41374 help? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg47b 41389* | TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg47rv 41390* | Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑂) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg47rv2 41391* | Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg49le 41392* | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐺‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46bOLDN 41393* | TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46c 41394* | TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑆)) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌⦋𝑁 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46rvOLDN 41395* | Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑂) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46rv2OLDN 41396* | Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46fvaw 41397* | Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐺‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐺‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46nlpq 41398* | Show that (𝐺‘𝑆) is not under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑆 isn't. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46ngfr 41399* | TODO FIX COMMENT g(f(s))=s p. 115 4th line from bottom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | cdlemeg46nfgr 41400* | TODO FIX COMMENT f(g(s))=s p. 115 antepenultimate line. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |