P. 414 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 41301-41400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rp-8frege 41301	Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	rp-frege25 41302	Closed form for a1dd 50. Alternate route to Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege6 41303	A closed form of imim2d 57 which is a deduction adding nested antecedents. Proposition 6 of [Frege1879] p. 33. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	axfrege8 41304	Swap antecedents. Identical to pm2.04 90. This demonstrates that Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35 is redundant. Proof follows closely proof of pm2.04 90 in https://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt 90, but in the style of Frege's 1879 work. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege7 41305	A closed form of syl6 35. The first antecedent is used to replace the consequent of the second antecedent. Proposition 7 of [Frege1879] p. 34. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))))
Axiom	ax-frege8 41306	Swap antecedents. If two conditions have a proposition as a consequence, their order is immaterial. Third axiom of Frege's 1879 work but identical to pm2.04 90 which can be proved from only ax-mp 5, ax-frege1 41287, and ax-frege2 41288. (Redundant) Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege26 41307	Identical to idd 24. Proposition 26 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege27 41308	We cannot (at the same time) affirm 𝜑 and deny 𝜑. Identical to id 22. Proposition 27 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege9 41309	Closed form of syl 17 with swapped antecedents. This proposition differs from frege5 41297 only in an unessential way. Identical to imim1 83. Proposition 9 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege12 41310	A closed form of com23 86. Proposition 12 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege11 41311	Elimination of a nested antecedent as a partial converse of ja 186. If the proposition that 𝜓 takes place or 𝜑 does not is a sufficient condition for 𝜒, then 𝜓 by itself is a sufficient condition for 𝜒. Identical to jarr 106. Proposition 11 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege24 41312	Closed form for a1d 25. Deduction introducing an embedded antecedent. Identical to rp-frege24 41294 which was proved without relying on ax-frege8 41306. Proposition 24 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege16 41313	A closed form of com34 91. Proposition 16 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege25 41314	Closed form for a1dd 50. Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege18 41315	Closed form of a syllogism followed by a swap of antecedents. Proposition 18 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege22 41316	A closed form of com45 97. Proposition 22 of [Frege1879] p. 41. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))
Theorem	frege10 41317	Result commuting antecedents within an antecedent. Proposition 10 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege17 41318	A closed form of com3l 89. Proposition 17 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege13 41319	A closed form of com3r 87. Proposition 13 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege14 41320	Closed form of a deduction based on com3r 87. Proposition 14 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege19 41321	A closed form of syl6 35. Proposition 19 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege23 41322	Syllogism followed by rotation of three antecedents. Proposition 23 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜃)))))
Theorem	frege15 41323	A closed form of com4r 94. Proposition 15 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
Theorem	frege21 41324	Replace antecedent in antecedent. Proposition 21 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege20 41325	A closed form of syl8 76. Proposition 20 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜃 → 𝜏) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
20.31.3.4  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication and Negation
Theorem	axfrege28 41326	Contraposition. Identical to con3 153. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege28 41327	Contraposition. Identical to con3 153. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. Axiom 28 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege29 41328	Closed form of con3d 152. Proposition 29 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege30 41329	Commuted, closed form of con3d 152. Proposition 30 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑)))
Theorem	axfrege31 41330	Identical to notnotr 130. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege31 41331	𝜑 cannot be denied and (at the same time ) ¬ ¬ 𝜑 affirmed. Duplex negatio affirmat. The denial of the denial is affirmation. Identical to notnotr 130. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege32 41332	Deduce con1 146 from con3 153. Proposition 32 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege33 41333	If 𝜑 or 𝜓 takes place, then 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place. Identical to con1 146. Proposition 33 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege34 41334	If as a conseqence of the occurrence of the circumstance 𝜑, when the obstacle 𝜓 is removed, 𝜒 takes place, then from the circumstance that 𝜒 does not take place while 𝜑 occurs the occurrence of the obstacle 𝜓 can be inferred. Closed form of con1d 145. Proposition 34 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege35 41335	Commuted, closed form of con1d 145. Proposition 35 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege36 41336	The case in which 𝜓 is denied, ¬ 𝜑 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed does not occur. If 𝜑 occurs, then (at least) one of the two, 𝜑 or 𝜓, takes place (no matter what 𝜓 might be). Identical to pm2.24 124. Proposition 36 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege37 41337	If 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the occurrence of 𝜓 or 𝜑, then 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of 𝜑 alone. Similar to a closed form of orcs 871. Proposition 37 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege38 41338	Identical to pm2.21 123. Proposition 38 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege39 41339	Syllogism between pm2.18 128 and pm2.24 124. Proposition 39 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege40 41340	Anything implies pm2.18 128. Proposition 40 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axfrege41 41341	Identical to notnot 142. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege41 41342	The affirmation of 𝜑 denies the denial of 𝜑. Identical to notnot 142. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege42 41343	Not not id 22. Proposition 42 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege43 41344	If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 128. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege44 41345	Similar to a commuted pm2.62 896. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege45 41346	Deduce pm2.6 190 from con1 146. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege46 41347	If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurrences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 190. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege47 41348	Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege48 41349	Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurrence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 41461. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege49 41350	Closed form of deduction with disjunction. Proposition 49 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege50 41351	Closed form of jaoi 853. Proposition 50 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege51 41352	Compare with jaod 855. Proposition 51 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜒))))
20.31.3.5  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with logical equivalence Here we leverage df-ifp 1060 to partition a wff into two that are disjoint with the selector wff. Thus if we are given ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) then we replace the concept (illegal in our notation ) (𝜑‘𝜓) with if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) to reason about the values of the "function." Likewise, we replace the similarly illegal concept ∀𝜓𝜑 with (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃).
Theorem	axfrege52a 41353	Justification for ax-frege52a 41354. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Axiom	ax-frege52a 41354	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed (in this specific case the identity logical function) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege52aid 41355	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 214. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53aid 41356	Specialization of frege53a 41357. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53a 41357	Lemma for frege55a 41365. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	axfrege54a 41358	Justification for ax-frege54a 41359. Identical to biid 260. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege54a 41359	Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 260. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege54cor0a 41360	Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1a 41361	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege55aid 41362	Lemma for frege57aid 41369. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55lem1a 41363	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜏 → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) → (𝜏 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege55lem2a 41364	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55a 41365	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55cor1a 41366	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege56aid 41367	Lemma for frege57aid 41369. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege56a 41368	Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege57aid 41369	This is the all imporant formula which allows us to apply Frege-style definitions and explore their consequences. A closed form of biimpri 227. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege57a 41370	Analogue of frege57aid 41369. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	axfrege58a 41371	Identical to anifp 1068. Justification for ax-frege58a 41372. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Axiom	ax-frege58a 41372	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2072. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	frege58acor 41373	Lemma for frege59a 41374. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege59a 41374	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 41310 incorrectly referenced where frege30 41329 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → ¬ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege60a 41375	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58a 41372. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜂) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege61a 41376	Lemma for frege65a 41380. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege62a 41377	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2664 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege63a 41378	Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (𝜂 → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege64a 41379	Lemma for frege65a 41380. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜒, 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege65a 41380	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2664 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege66a 41381	Swap antecedents of frege65a 41380. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege67a 41382	Lemma for frege68a 41383. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege68a 41383	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)))
20.31.3.6  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of sets
Theorem	axfrege52c 41384	Justification for ax-frege52c 41385. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege52c 41385	One side of dfsbcq 3713. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege52b 41386	The case when the content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑦 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝑥 is affirmed and the same proposition, this time where we substitute the content of 𝑦, is denied does not take place. In [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑, 𝑥 can also occur in other than the argument (𝑧) places. Hence 𝑥 may still be contained in [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	frege53b 41387	Lemma for frege102 (via frege92 41452). Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege54c 41388	Reflexive equality of classes. Identical to eqid 2738. Justification for ax-frege54c 41389. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Axiom	ax-frege54c 41389	Reflexive equality of sets (as classes). Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to eqid 2738. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege54b 41390	Reflexive equality of sets. The content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑥. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Slightly specialized version of eqid 2738. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege54cor1b 41391	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege55lem1b 41392*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	frege55lem2b 41393	Lemma for frege55b 41394. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55b 41394	Lemma for frege57b 41396. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Note that eqtr2 2762 incorporates eqcom 2745 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2021. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56b 41395	Lemma for frege57b 41396. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)) → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57b 41396	Analogue of frege57aid 41369. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege58b 41397	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2072. Justification for ax-frege58b 41398. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege58b 41398	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2072. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bid 41399	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, 𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to sp 2178. See ax-frege58b 41398 and frege58c 41418 for versions which more closely track the original. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bcor 41400	Lemma for frege59b 41401. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))