P. 331 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33001-33100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	atdmd 33001	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(c) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd 33002	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(b) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd2 33003	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. Part of Exercise 6 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atabsi 33004	Absorption of an incomparable atom. Similar to Exercise 7.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atabs2i 33005	Absorption of an incomparable atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴))
20.8.7  Modular symmetry
Theorem	mdsymlem1 33006*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem2 33007*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem3 33008*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdsymlem4 33009*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. This is the forward direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem5 33010*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝑞 = 𝑝 → ((𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (((𝑐 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑐) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑐 → 𝑝 ⊆ ((𝑐 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴))))))
Theorem	mdsymlem6 33011*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem7 33012*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdsymlem8 33013*	Lemma for mdsymi 33014. Lemma 4(ii) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵))
Theorem	mdsymi 33014	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsym 33015	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsym 33016	Dual M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴))
Theorem	atdmd2 33017	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdii 33018	If the subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed, then the elements are a dual modular pair. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	cmmdi 33019	Commuting subspaces form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmdmdi 33020	Commuting subspaces form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdlem 33021	Lemma for sumdmdi 33023. The span of vector 𝐶 not in the subspace sum is "trimmed off." (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 +ℋ (span‘{𝐶})) ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	sumdmdlem2 33022*	Lemma for sumdmdi 33023. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	sumdmdi 33023	The subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed iff the elements are a dual modular pair. Theorem 2 of [Holland] p. 1519. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	dmdbr4ati 33024*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr5ati 33025*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr6ati 33026*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. The modular law takes the form of the shearing identity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) = ((((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	dmdbr7ati 33027*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	mdoc1i 33028	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	mdoc2i 33029	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	dmdoc1i 33030	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	dmdoc2i 33031	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴
Theorem	mdcompli 33032	A condition equivalent to the modular pair property. Part of proof of Theorem 1.14 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdcompli 33033	A condition equivalent to the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmdin0i 33034*	If dual modular implies modular whenever meet is zero, then dual modular implies modular for arbitrary lattice elements. This theorem is needed for the remark after Lemma 7 of [Holland] p. 1524 to hold. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 𝑀ℋ* 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = 0ℋ) → 𝑥 𝑀ℋ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdjreui 33035*	A member of the sum of disjoint subspaces has a unique decomposition. Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	cdj1i 33036*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) => (2) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑣)) ≤ (𝑤 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑣)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) = 1 → 𝑥 ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)))))
Theorem	cdj3lem1 33037*	A property of "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑧)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑧)))) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	cdj3lem2 33038*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. Value of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	cdj3lem2a 33039*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. Closure of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdj3lem2b 33040*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. The first-component function 𝑆 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3lem3 33041*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. Value of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐷)
Theorem	cdj3lem3a 33042*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. Closure of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdj3lem3b 33043*	Lemma for cdj3i 33044. The second-component function 𝑇 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3i 33044*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) <=> (3) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
PART 21  SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL (USERS' MATHBOXES)
21.1  Mathboxes for user contributions
21.1.1  Mathbox guidelines
Theorem	mathbox 33045	(This theorem is a dummy placeholder for these guidelines. The label of this theorem, "mathbox", is hard-coded into the Metamath program to identify the start of the mathbox section for web page generation.) A "mathbox" is a user-contributed section that is maintained by its contributor independently from the main part of set.mm. For contributors: By making a contribution, you agree to release it into the public domain, according to the statement at the beginning of set.mm. Mathboxes are provided to help keep your work synchronized with changes in set.mm while allowing you to work independently without affecting other contributors. Even though in a sense your mathbox belongs to you, it is still part of the shared body of knowledge contained in set.mm, and occasionally other people may make maintenance edits to your mathbox for things like keeping it synchronized with the rest of set.mm, reducing proof lengths, moving your theorems to the main part of set.mm when needed, and fixing typos or other errors. If you want to preserve it the way you left it, you can keep a local copy or keep track of the GitHub commit number. Guidelines: 1. See conventions 31002 for our general style guidelines. For contributing via GitHub, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md 31002. The Metamath program command "verify markup *" will check that you have followed many of the conventions we use. 2. If at all possible, please use only nullary class constants for new definitions, for example as in df-div 11975. 3. Each $p and $a statement must be immediately preceded with the comment that will be shown on its web page description. The Metamath program "MM> WRITE SOURCE set.mm / REWRAP" command will take care of indentation conventions and line wrapping. 4. All mathbox content will be on public display and should hopefully reflect the overall quality of the website. 5. Mathboxes must be independent from one another (checked by "verify markup *"). If you need a theorem from another mathbox, typically it is moved to the main part of set.mm. New users should consult with more experienced users before doing this. 6. If a contributor is no longer active, we will continue the usual maintenance edits. As time goes on, often theorems will be moved to main or removed in favor of similar replacements. But we are also willing to maintain mathboxes in place, as work by others from years ago may form the foundation of future work; you could even argue that all of mathematics is like that. 7. For theorems of importance (for example, a Metamath 100 theorem or a dependency of one), we prefer to eventually move them out of mathboxes (although a mathbox is perfectly appropriate as proofs are being developed and refined). (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2007.) (Revised by the Metamath team, 9-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
21.2  Mathbox for Jorge Agra
Theorem	tgacne 33046	Non-collinearity of triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 implies distinct vertices 𝐴 and 𝐶. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	tgbcne 33047	Non-collinearity of triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 implies distinct vertices 𝐵 and 𝐶. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	cgrahlb 33048	Two null angles are congruent: if 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on one half-line from 𝐵, and 𝐷 and 𝐹 on one half-line from 𝐸, then angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ is congruent to ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩. This is GeoCoq l11_21_b ; set.mm has only the converse, cgrahl 29336 (GeoCoq l11_21_a ). Proved by copying both arms onto the target rays with hlcgrex 29083 and closing the third side by segment subtraction (tgcgrsub2 29059), so it needs no non-collinear frame. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	inagbtwn 33049	A flat sub-angle forces the containing angle flat: if 𝑊 is inside angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ and 𝐸 lies between 𝐷 and 𝑊, then 𝐸 lies between 𝐷 and 𝐹. This is GeoCoq bet_in_angle_bet. Proved by unfolding isinag 29358 and following its segment point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))
Theorem	inagcgrasubhl 33050*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (i): the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩ is **null**, 𝑊 lying on ray 𝐸𝐷. The witness is not constructed -- it is 𝑋, the target's own first arm -- and cgrahlb 33048 supplies the copied angle from the two ray degeneracies. No GeoCoq counterpart: GeoCoq's branch only locates a witness supplied by its universal statement. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgrasubbtwn 33051*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (ii): the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩ is **flat**, 𝐸 lying between 𝐷 and 𝑊. The witness is built beyond 𝑌 on the ray opposite 𝑌𝑋 with axtgsegcon 28927, and flatcgra 29333 supplies the copied angle from the two betweennesses. The in-angle conjunct goes through inagbtwn 33049, which carries the flatness up to the containing angle, then cgrabtwn 29335 across the congruence and isinagd 29359 on the target. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgrabtwn 33052*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (iii): the containing angle is **flat** while the sub-angle is not. This is the 𝑥 = 𝐸 disjunct of isinag 29358, which the non-degenerate spine cannot reach. Unlike branches (i) and (ii) the copied angle must be *constructed*: the congruence hypothesis relates 𝑊 to nothing on the target side, and acopy 29342 needs a point off line 𝑋𝑌 to pick a side, which the collinear 𝑍 cannot be. ncoltgdim2 29029 takes the dimension from this branch's own non-collinearity and tglowdim2ln 29121 produces that point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	iscgrag 33053*	Ray normalization: an angle congruence yields two points on the target rays carrying a full triangle congruence, together with the two arm lengths. This is the forward direction of iscgra 29317 (Schwabhauser 11.3) repackaged -- nothing is constructed; the distances are read off the cgrG with cgr3simp1 28984 and cgr3simp2 28985. No non-degeneracy hypothesis is needed or wanted: cgrA carries vertex distinctness intrinsically (cgrane1 29320 through cgrane4 29323), and an extra hypothesis would obstruct the degenerate branches. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ((⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹) ∧ ((𝐸 − 𝑥) = (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∧ (𝐸 − 𝑦) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))))
Theorem	cgrgptxfr 33054*	Transfer a segment point across a triangle congruence: given ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩cgrG⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑍”⟩ and 𝐽 between 𝐴 and 𝐶, the corresponding point on (𝑋𝐼𝑍) exists, with its betweenness, its two distances and the sub-triangle congruence. GeoCoq reaches this through l4_6 and cong2_conga_cong ; here cgrg3col4 29373 (Schwabhauser 11.28) constructs the point with every pairwise distance and tgbtwnxfr 28994 -- which *is* l4_6 -- supplies the image betweenness. The 𝐴 = 𝐶 case takes cgrg3col4 29373's right disjunct, since tgellng 29017 needs 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 and cgrA does not supply it. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑦”⟩) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐽) = (𝑋 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝐽 − 𝐶) = (𝑦 − 𝑍))))
Theorem	inagcgratrgmain 33055	In-angle transport, the non-degenerate main case, with its three constructions carried as hypotheses: 𝐽 the segment point from isinag 29358, 𝑆 and 𝑇 the normalized target arms from iscgrag 33053, and 𝑄 the transferred point from cgrgptxfr 33054. Concludes the body of cgrainag 33061's existential at the witness 𝑄. **No acopy 29342 and no half-plane fact**: the witness is the transferred point, not a fresh angle copy, which is what removes the non-collinearity obligations. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑆𝐼𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑄”⟩)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑄”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgw 33056*	inagcgratrgmain 33055 with the existential introduced at its own witness 𝑄. Split out so that the substitution instance is built once, at the top level, rather than under the existential eliminations that produce 𝑆, 𝑇 and 𝑄. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑆𝐼𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑄”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgxfr 33057*	In-angle transport with the target arms already normalized to 𝑆 and 𝑇: cgrgptxfr 33054 transfers the segment point 𝐽 to a point of (𝑆𝐼𝑇), and that one existential is eliminated here. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑇”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgncol 33058*	In-angle transport once the segment point 𝐽 of isinag 29358 is on the ray 𝐸𝑊: iscgrag 33053 normalizes the target arms and its two existentials are eliminated here, leaving inagcgratrgxfr 33057 to do the transfer. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgn 33059*	In-angle transport, non-collinear case: unfold isinag 29358, eliminate its segment-point existential, and dispatch on the disjunct it carries -- 𝑥 = 𝐸 to inagcgrabtwn 33052, 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊 to inagcgratrgncol 33058. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inaglea 33060	If 𝐶 lies inside angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩, then angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ is less than or equal to ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩)
Theorem	cgrainag 33061*	Target-side in-angle transport: if 𝑊 lies inside angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ and that angle is congruent to ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩, then some point inside ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ makes ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩ congruent to the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩. The geometric core of leawittrg 33062. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	leawittrg 33062*	Target-side ≤∠ witness transport: move a witness inside ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ across a congruent target angle ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩, carrying the angle ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩ copied at that witness with it. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	leacgra2 33063	Target-side ≤∠ transport: replacing the larger angle by a congruent angle preserves the angle order. Proved from leawittrg 33062 and isleag 29367, the witness form of ≤∠. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leacgra1 33064	Source-side ≤∠ transport: replacing the smaller angle by a congruent angle preserves the angle order. The counterpart of leacgra2 33063, proved directly from the witness form of ≤∠ (isleag 29367, isleagd 29368). (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leacgra 33065	GeoCoq l11_30 analogue: ≤∠ is preserved when both compared angles are replaced by congruent angles. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)
Theorem	tgmircgrg 33066	Reflecting 𝐵 through the midpoint of 𝐴 and 𝐶 carries triangle 𝐶𝐴𝐵 onto 𝐴𝐶𝑃, where 𝑃 is the reflected point. The dimension condition the mid* family carries is discharged from the non-collinearity through ncoltgdim2 29029, not taken as a hypothesis. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶(((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)”⟩)
Theorem	tgmircgra 33067	The angle congruence the exterior-angle theorem opens with: the interior angle at 𝐴 in triangle 𝐶𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the angle at 𝐶 in the midpoint-reflected triangle. This is cgrcgra 29329 over tgmircgrg 33066; the vertex distinctnesses come from the non-collinearity via tgbcne 33047 and tgacne 33046. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶(((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)”⟩)
Theorem	tgextamirn 33068	The midpoint-reflected point is off line 𝐴𝐶. If it were on that line, mirln 29149-- whose centre-on-the-line hypothesis is the midpoint, itself on 𝐴𝐶-- would put its reflection there too, and mirmir 29135 says that reflection is 𝐵, contradicting the triangle's non-collinearity. This is the strengthening inA cannot give: it is what turns "inside the angle" into an open half-plane fact. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶))
Theorem	tgextancd 33069	The target-side non-collinearity of the exterior angle. Line 𝐶𝐷 is line 𝐶𝐵-- 𝐶 lies between 𝐵 and 𝐷, and 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷-- so 𝐴 is off it exactly because the triangle is non-degenerate. This is acopyeu 29343's acopy.2 frame hypothesis in tgextancgra 33075, and it is what excludes isinag 29358's 𝑥 = 𝐶 branch in tgextahp 33074. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	tgextahpl 33070	The generic open half-plane core. From a point 𝑋 between 𝐴 and 𝐷 that is on the half-line from 𝐶 through 𝑊, with 𝑊 off line 𝐴𝐶, both 𝑋 and 𝐷 and both 𝑋 and 𝑊 land on the same side of line 𝐴𝐶 (two colhp 29249 applications), and hpgcom 29246 / hpgtr 29247 compose them. 𝑋 ≠ 𝐶 is read off .xk by hlne1 29072, so no 𝑥 = 𝐶 case reaches here. The $d s are on proof dummies only -- colhp 29249's class abstraction needs its own bound variables -- so nothing propagates to callers. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐶)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴𝐿𝐶))𝐷)
Theorem	tgextalem1inag 33071	The point obtained by reflecting 𝐵 through the midpoint of 𝐴 and 𝐶 lies inside the exterior angle ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩. Proved by Pasch on the midpoint and the extension, turned into an in-angle statement with isinagd 29359 and moved from ray 𝐶𝑀 to ray 𝐶𝐴 by inaghl 29365. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgextale 33072	The non-strict exterior-angle bound, a checkpoint only. tgmircgra 33067 gives the reflected copy of the interior angle, tgextalem1inag 33071 puts that copy inside the exterior angle; inaglea 33060 turns "inside" into ≤∠ and leacgra1 33064 transports the bound along the congruence (flipped with cgracom 29330). No new geometry. This bound is deliberately too weak for tgaas 33087, whose contradiction branch already holds an angle congruence and so satisfies ≤∠ for free -- strictness comes later, and only tgexta 33079 is the exterior-angle theorem. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgextamirnhl 33073	The midpoint-reflected point is not on the ray from 𝐶 through 𝐷. If it were, then -- ray 𝐶𝐷 being the extension of 𝐵𝐶-- it would lie on line 𝐶𝐵; mirln2 29150, the converse of the mirln 29149 used in tgextamirn 33068, would put the midpoint of 𝐴 and 𝐶 on that line too; and the midpoint is collinear with 𝐴 and 𝐶, so 𝐴 would land on line 𝐶𝐵, contradicting the triangle's non-collinearity. 𝑀 ≠ 𝐶 comes from ismidb 29284 / mirinv 29139 / mirne 29140, not from midbtwn 29285. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐶)(((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵))
Theorem	tgextahp 33074	The reflected point and 𝐷 lie on the same OPEN half-plane of line 𝐴𝐶-- the fact acopyeu 29343 requires and inA does not give. tgextalem1inag 33071 puts the reflected point inside the exterior angle, which is non-strict: isinag 29358's witness clause is (𝑥 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐶)𝑃), so a point inside an angle may sit on a boundary ray. The 𝑥 = 𝐶 branch collapses to (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷) and is killed by tgextancd 33069; the main branch is tgextahpl 33070, whose off-line input is tgextamirn 33068. The $d s are the mandatory ones isinag 29358 carries for the witness variable. (Contributed by JAG , 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴𝐿𝐶))𝐷)
Theorem	tgextancgra 33075	The exterior angle is NOT congruent to the remote interior angle -- the strictness tgextale 33072 cannot give, and what tgaas 33087's contradiction branch needs. The exterior angle is ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩, at the extension of 𝐵𝐶 beyond 𝐶. The tail of GeoCoq's l11_41_aux , run through acopyeu 29343 rather than conga_cop_or_out_ts : a congruent exterior angle would, by angle-construction uniqueness, put the midpoint-reflected point of tgmircgra 33067 on the ray 𝐶𝐷-- the two rays make congruent angles with the shared base ray 𝐶𝐴 and, by tgextahp 33074 and hpgid 29245, lie on the same open half-plane of line 𝐴𝐶-- which tgextamirnhl 33073 forbids. Both of acopyeu 29343's non-collinearity hypotheses are discharged, not assumed: source side by rotating the triangle's own ncol , target side by tgextancd 33069. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgextaoa 33076	The two exterior angles at 𝐶 are VERTICAL, hence congruent. Ray 𝐶𝐷 is opposite ray 𝐶𝐵 and ray 𝐶𝐸 is opposite ray 𝐶𝐴, so ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐸”⟩ and ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ have both legs flipped. One sacgr 29340 (Schwabhaeuser 11.13, GeoCoq l11_13 ) does it in a single shot, because sacgr 29340 flips the first slot of each side independently: the premise it wants is ⟨“𝐷𝐶𝐸”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐶𝐷”⟩, a bare angle reversal by cgraswap 29328, needing no non-collinearity at all. oacgr 29341 (11.14) would prove the same thing from two supplements and is not used. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐸”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	tgextalt1 33077	tgexta 33079's FIRST conjunct, strict -- the remote interior angle at 𝐴 is strictly less than the exterior angle at 𝐶. tgextale 33072 and tgextancgra 33075 deliver both halves already, but stated about ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩; tgexta 33079 wants ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩, the same angle read backwards. So this is cgraswap 29328 plus two transports: leacgra1 33064 for the ≤∠ half, and cgratr 29331 under mtand 828 for the negation -- if ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩ were congruent to the exterior angle then so would ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩ be, which tgextancgra 33075 forbids. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩))
Theorem	tgextalt2 33078	tgexta 33079's SECOND conjunct, strict, at a supplied second extension point 𝐸. This is NOT a permutation of the first conjunct: 𝐸 is a new point, 𝐶 between 𝐴 and 𝐸, and tgextale 33072 / tgextancgra 33075 are applied a second time at the reconfigured triangle (the roles of 𝐴 and 𝐵 exchanged, exterior angle ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐸”⟩). tgextaoa 33076 then identifies ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐸”⟩ with ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ as vertical angles, and the two halves are transported across that congruence -- leacgra 33065 for ≤∠, and cgratr 29331 under mtand 828 for the negation, which leacgra 33065 cannot move. 𝐸 is existentially constructed by tgexta 33079, not here. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩))
Theorem	tgexta 33079	The exterior-angle theorem, GeoCoq l11_41 -- BOTH remote interior angles of the triangle are STRICTLY less than the exterior angle at 𝐶. There is no ltA in set.mm , so strictness is carried inline as ≤∠ together with the non-congruence; the pair is what tgaas 33087's contradiction branch needs, since a bare ≤∠ conclusion is satisfied by a congruence and so contradicts nothing (tgextan 33080 records that the pair is usable). The second conjunct is not a permutation of the first: axtgsegcon 28927 builds a second extension point 𝑦 beyond 𝐶 on line 𝐴𝐶, tgextalt2 33078 reruns the construction there, and the two exterior angles are identified as vertical by tgextaoa 33076. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩) ∧ (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)))
Theorem	tgextan 33080	tgexta 33079's strictness can be used -- a remote interior angle congruent to the exterior angle is contradictory, so anything follows. This is the shape tgaasexc 33082 consumes: that branch holds an angle congruence and must close on it, which the non-strict ≤∠-only form of tgexta 33079 could never let it do. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	tgaasncol 33081	Slide a non-collinearity along the line it is off: if 𝑋 is off line 𝑌𝑍 and 𝑊 is a point of that line other than 𝑍, then 𝑋 is off line 𝑍𝑊 too. Lines 𝑍𝑌 and 𝑍𝑊 coincide (tglineeltr 29100), which is what the exterior-angle hypothesis of tgaasexc 33082 needs at the moving point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑊) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊))
Theorem	tgaasexc 33082	The contradiction branch of AAS, stated once for both orders of the two candidate points. 𝑆 lies strictly between 𝐸 and 𝑇, and 𝐷 is off the line, so ⟨“𝐷𝑆𝐸”⟩ is an exterior angle of triangle 𝐷𝑇𝑆 and is STRICTLY greater than the remote interior angle at 𝑇-- while the hypothesis says the two are congruent. tgextan 33080 turns that into anything. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝑇) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝑇𝐸”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝑆𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	tgaasne 33083	Two DISTINCT points 𝐹 and 𝐻 on one half-line from 𝐸, subtending congruent angles at a point 𝐷 off the line, are contradictory. ishlg 29069 unfolds the half-line to "one of them is strictly between 𝐸 and the other" -- both sub-branches are proved, each by tgaasexc 33082 on its own triangle, and they are not permutations of one another: the second needs the non-collinearity transported to line 𝐸𝐻 by cgrancol 29338. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐹𝐸”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐻𝐸”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	tgaascgra 33084	The comparison triangle of the AAS route: with 𝐻 placed on ray 𝐸𝐹 at distance 𝐵𝐶 from 𝐸, the triangle 𝐷𝐸𝐻 is congruent to 𝐴𝐵𝐶 (cgrahl2 29325 then tgsas 29401), so its angle at 𝐻 can be read off (cgrcgra 29329) and matched against the given angle at 𝐹. The result is the angle congruence the case split of tgaas1h 33085 consumes. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐹𝐸”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐻𝐸”⟩)
Theorem	tgaas1h 33085	tgaas1 33086 with the constructed point 𝐻 still explicit: the case split on 𝐹 = 𝐻. Equal, and the side equality is a substitution; distinct, and tgaasne 33083 closes the branch. BOTH branches are proved -- assuming 𝐹 = 𝐻 would be assuming the theorem. (Contributed by JAG , 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	tgaas1 33086	Under the AAS hypotheses, the side included between the two given angles is congruent. This is the whole content of AAS: tgaas 33087 simply packages it with SAS (tgsas 29401). The point copied onto ray 𝐸𝐹 by tgaascgra 33084 is eliminated here. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	tgaas 33087	Angle-angle-side: two triangles with two congruent angles and a congruent side not included between them are congruent. The side included between the two angles is congruent by tgaas1 33086, which reduces the theorem to SAS (tgsas 29401). (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
21.3  Mathbox for Stefan Allan
Theorem	sa-abvi 33088	A theorem about the universal class. Inference associated with bj-abv 37893 (which is proved from fewer axioms). (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 9-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	xfree 33089	A partial converse to 19.9t 2240. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	xfree2 33090	A partial converse to 19.9t 2240. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	addltmulALT 33091	A proof readability experiment for addltmul 12583. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 30-Oct-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (2 < 𝐴 ∧ 2 < 𝐵)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
21.4  Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux
21.4.1  Propositional Calculus - misc additions
Theorem	ad11antr 33092	Deduction adding 11 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-12l 33093	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-12r 33094	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜓)
Theorem	an52ds 33095	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂)
Theorem	an62ds 33096	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜁)
Theorem	an72ds 33097	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜎)
Theorem	an82ds 33098	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜌)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜌)
Theorem	syl22anbrc 33099	Syllogism inference. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	or3di 33100	Distributive law for disjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)))