| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 331 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31009) |
(31010-32532) |
(32533-50277) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | xreceu 33001* | Existential uniqueness of reciprocals. Theorem I.8 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (𝐵 ·e 𝑥) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | xdivcld 33002 | Closure law for the extended division. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | xdivcl 33003 | Closure law for the extended division. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | xdivmul 33004 | Relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0)) → ((𝐴 /𝑒 𝐶) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ·e 𝐵) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | rexdiv 33005 | The extended real division operation when both arguments are real. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐴 / 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xdivrec 33006 | Relationship between division and reciprocal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·e (1 /𝑒 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | xdivid 33007 | A number divided by itself is one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐴) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | xdiv0 33008 | Division into zero is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (0 /𝑒 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | xdiv0rp 33009 | Division into zero is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (0 /𝑒 𝐴) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | eliccioo 33010 | Membership in a closed interval of extended reals versus the same open interval. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | elxrge02 33011 | Elementhood in the set of nonnegative extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∨ 𝐴 = +∞)) | ||
| Theorem | xdivpnfrp 33012 | Plus infinity divided by a positive real number is plus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (+∞ /𝑒 𝐴) = +∞) | ||
| Theorem | rpxdivcld 33013 | Closure law for extended division of positive reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | xrpxdivcld 33014 | Closure law for extended division of positive extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ (0[,]+∞)) | ||
| Theorem | wrdres 33015 | Condition for the restriction of a word to be a word itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 ↾ (0..^𝑁)) ∈ Word 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | wrdsplex 33016* | Existence of a split of a word at a given index. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Oct-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ Word 𝑆𝑊 = ((𝑊 ↾ (0..^𝑁)) ++ 𝑣)) | ||
| Theorem | wrdfsupp 33017 | A word has finite support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | wrdpmcl 33018 | Closure of a word with permuted symbols. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐽 = (0..^(♯‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸:𝐽–1-1-onto→𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∘ 𝐸) ∈ Word 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | pfx1s2 33019 | The prefix of length 1 of a length 2 word. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈“𝐴𝐵”〉 prefix 1) = 〈“𝐴”〉) | ||
| Theorem | pfxrn2 33020 | The range of a prefix of a word is a subset of the range of that word. Stronger version of pfxrn 14637. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → ran (𝑊 prefix 𝐿) ⊆ ran 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | pfxrn3 33021 | Express the range of a prefix of a word. Stronger version of pfxrn2 33020. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → ran (𝑊 prefix 𝐿) = (𝑊 “ (0..^𝐿))) | ||
| Theorem | pfxf1 33022 | Condition for a prefix to be injective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊:dom 𝑊–1-1→𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 prefix 𝐿):dom (𝑊 prefix 𝐿)–1-1→𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | s1f1 33023 | Conditions for a length 1 string to be a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐼”〉:dom 〈“𝐼”〉–1-1→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | s2rnOLD 33024 | Obsolete version of s2rn 14914 as of 1-Aug-2025. Range of a length 2 string. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 〈“𝐼𝐽”〉 = {𝐼, 𝐽}) | ||
| Theorem | s2f1 33025 | Conditions for a length 2 string to be a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ≠ 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐼𝐽”〉:dom 〈“𝐼𝐽”〉–1-1→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | s3rnOLD 33026 | Obsolete version of s2rn 14914 as of 1-Aug-2025. Range of a length 3 string. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 〈“𝐼𝐽𝐾”〉 = {𝐼, 𝐽, 𝐾}) | ||
| Theorem | s3f1 33027 | Conditions for a length 3 string to be a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ≠ 𝐽) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐼𝐽𝐾”〉:dom 〈“𝐼𝐽𝐾”〉–1-1→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | s3clhash 33028 | Closure of the words of length 3 in a preimage using the hash function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ 〈“𝐼𝐽𝐾”〉 ∈ (◡♯ “ {3}) | ||
| Theorem | ccatf1 33029 | Conditions for a concatenation to be injective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:dom 𝐴–1-1→𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:dom 𝐵–1-1→𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵):dom (𝐴 ++ 𝐵)–1-1→𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | pfxlsw2ccat 33030 | Reconstruct a word from its prefix and its last two symbols. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → 𝑊 = ((𝑊 prefix (𝑁 − 2)) ++ 〈“(𝑊‘(𝑁 − 2))(𝑊‘(𝑁 − 1))”〉)) | ||
| Theorem | ccatws1f1o 33031 | Conditions for the concatenation of a word and a singleton word to be bijective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (0..^(𝑁 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(0..^𝑁)–1-1-onto→(0..^𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ++ 〈“𝑁”〉):𝐽–1-1-onto→𝐽) | ||
| Theorem | ccatws1f1olast 33032 | Two ways to reorder symbols in a word 𝑊 according to permutation 𝑇, and add a last symbol 𝑋. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑁 = (♯‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(0..^𝑁)–1-1-onto→(0..^𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑊 ++ 〈“𝑋”〉) ∘ (𝑇 ++ 〈“𝑁”〉)) = ((𝑊 ∘ 𝑇) ++ 〈“𝑋”〉)) | ||
| Theorem | wrdt2ind 33033* | Perform an induction over the structure of a word of even length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ++ 〈“𝑖𝑗”〉) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ 2 ∥ (♯‘𝐴)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | swrdrn2 33034 | The range of a subword is a subset of the range of that word. Stronger version of swrdrn 14604. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → ran (𝑊 substr 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉) ⊆ ran 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | swrdrn3 33035 | Express the range of a subword. Stronger version of swrdrn2 33034. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → ran (𝑊 substr 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉) = (𝑊 “ (𝑀..^𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | swrdf1 33036 | Condition for a subword to be injective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊:dom 𝑊–1-1→𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 substr 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉):dom (𝑊 substr 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉)–1-1→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | swrdrndisj 33037 | Condition for the range of two subwords of an injective word to be disjoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊:dom 𝑊–1-1→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (𝑁...𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑁...(♯‘𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (𝑊 substr 〈𝑀, 𝑁〉) ∩ ran (𝑊 substr 〈𝑂, 𝑃〉)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | splfv3 33038 | Symbols to the right of a splice are unaffected. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (0...𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑆))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Word 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑆) − 𝑇))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (𝐹 + (♯‘𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 splice 〈𝐹, 𝑇, 𝑅〉)‘(𝑋 + 𝐾)) = (𝑆‘(𝑋 + 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | 1cshid 33039 | Cyclically shifting a single letter word keeps it unchanged. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 1) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) = 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | cshw1s2 33040 | Cyclically shifting a length 2 word swaps its symbols. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈“𝐴𝐵”〉 cyclShift 1) = 〈“𝐵𝐴”〉) | ||
| Theorem | cshwrnid 33041 | Cyclically shifting a word preserves its range. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ran (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) = ran 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | cshf1o 33042 | Condition for the cyclic shift to be a bijection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝐷 ∧ 𝑊:dom 𝑊–1-1→𝐷 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁):dom 𝑊–1-1-onto→ran 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | ressplusf 33043 | The group operation function +𝑓 of a structure's restriction is the operation function's restriction to the new base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⨣ Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (+𝑓‘𝐻) = ( ⨣ ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ressnm 33044 | The norm in a restricted structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (norm‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 0 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑁 ↾ 𝐴) = (norm‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | abvpropd2 33045 | Weaker version of abvpropd 20801. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐾) = (+g‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (.r‘𝐾) = (.r‘𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | ressprs 33046 | The restriction of a proset is a proset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐾 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Proset ) | ||
| Theorem | posrasymb 33047 | A poset ordering is asymmetric. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | odutos 33048 | Being a toset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → 𝐷 ∈ Toset) | ||
| Theorem | tlt2 33049 | In a Toset, two elements must compare. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | tlt3 33050 | In a Toset, two elements must compare strictly, or be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | trleile 33051 | In a Toset, two elements must compare. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | toslublem 33052* | Lemma for toslub 33053 and xrsclat 33091. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) (Revised by NM, 15-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑐 → 𝑎 ≤ 𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | toslub 33053 | In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < )) | ||
| Theorem | tosglblem 33054* | Lemma for tosglb 33055 and xrsclat 33091. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) (Revised by NM, 15-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑐 ≤ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ≤ 𝑎)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎◡ < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏◡ < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏◡ < 𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | tosglb 33055 | Same theorem as toslub 33053, for infinimum. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((glb‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = inf(𝐴, 𝐵, < )) | ||
| Theorem | clatp0cl 33056 | The poset zero of a complete lattice belongs to its base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ CLat → 0 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | clatp1cl 33057 | The poset one of a complete lattice belongs to its base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ CLat → 1 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Syntax | cmnt 33058 | Extend class notation with monotone functions. |
| class Monot | ||
| Syntax | cmgc 33059 | Extend class notation with the monotone Galois connection. |
| class MGalConn | ||
| Definition | df-mnt 33060* | Define a monotone function between two ordered sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ Monot = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑣) / 𝑎⦌{𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ↑m 𝑎) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑥(le‘𝑣)𝑦 → (𝑓‘𝑥)(le‘𝑤)(𝑓‘𝑦))}) | ||
| Definition | df-mgc 33061* | Define monotone Galois connections. See mgcval 33067 for an expanded version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ MGalConn = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑣) / 𝑎⦌⦋(Base‘𝑤) / 𝑏⦌{〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝑏 ↑m 𝑎) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑎 ↑m 𝑏)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑓‘𝑥)(le‘𝑤)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥(le‘𝑣)(𝑔‘𝑦)))}) | ||
| Theorem | mntoval 33062* | Operation value of the monotone function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑉Monot𝑊) = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ (𝑓‘𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | ismnt 33063* | Express the statement "𝐹 is monotone". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑉Monot𝑊) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ (𝐹‘𝑦))))) | ||
| Theorem | ismntd 33064 | Property of being a monotone increasing function, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑉Monot𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≲ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | mntf 33065 | A monotone function is a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑉Monot𝑊)) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mgcoval 33066* | Operation value of the monotone Galois connection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑓‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑦)))}) | ||
| Theorem | mgcval 33067* |
Monotone Galois connection between two functions 𝐹 and 𝐺. If
this relation is satisfied, 𝐹 is called the lower adjoint of 𝐺,
and 𝐺 is called the upper adjoint of 𝐹.
Technically, this is implemented as an operation taking a pair of structures 𝑉 and 𝑊, expected to be posets, which gives a relation between pairs of functions 𝐹 and 𝐺. If such a relation exists, it can be proven to be unique. Galois connections generalize the fundamental theorem of Galois theory about the correspondence between subgroups and subfields. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑦))))) | ||
| Theorem | mgcf1 33068 | The lower adjoint 𝐹 of a Galois connection is a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mgcf2 33069 | The upper adjoint 𝐺 of a Galois connection is a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mgccole1 33070 | An inequality for the kernel operator 𝐺 ∘ 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | mgccole2 33071 | Inequality for the closure operator (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) of the Galois connection 𝐻. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)) ≲ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | mgcmnt1 33072 | The lower adjoint 𝐹 of a Galois connection is monotonically increasing. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≲ (𝐹‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | mgcmnt2 33073 | The upper adjoint 𝐺 of a Galois connection is monotonically increasing. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≲ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | mgcmntco 33074* | A Galois connection like statement, for two functions with same range. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑋) & ⊢ < = (le‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑉Monot𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑊Monot𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐾‘𝑥) < (𝐿‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐾‘(𝐺‘𝑦)) < (𝐿‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | dfmgc2lem 33075* | Lemma for dfmgc2, backwards direction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ (𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑢 ≲ 𝑣 → (𝐺‘𝑢) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑣))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑢)) ≲ 𝑢) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | dfmgc2 33076* | Alternate definition of the monotone Galois connection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≲ (𝐹‘𝑦)) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑢 ≲ 𝑣 → (𝐺‘𝑢) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑣))) ∧ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑢)) ≲ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))))) | ||
| Theorem | mgcmnt1d 33077 | Galois connection implies monotonicity of the left adjoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑉Monot𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mgcmnt2d 33078 | Galois connection implies monotonicity of the right adjoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑊Monot𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mgccnv 33079 | The inverse Galois connection is the Galois connection of the dual orders. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ODual‘𝑊)MGalConn(ODual‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Proset ) → (𝐹𝐻𝐺 ↔ 𝐺𝑀𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | pwrssmgc 33080* | Given a function 𝐹, exhibit a Galois connection between subsets of its domain and subsets of its range. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝑌 ↦ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑛)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∣ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑦}) ⊆ 𝑚}) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (toInc‘𝒫 𝑌) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (toInc‘𝒫 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺(𝑉MGalConn𝑊)𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | mgcf1olem1 33081 | Property of a Galois connection, lemma for mgcf1o 33083. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | mgcf1olem2 33082 | Property of a Galois connection, lemma for mgcf1o 33083. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | mgcf1o 33083 | Given a Galois connection, exhibit an order isomorphism. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑉MGalConn𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑉) & ⊢ ≲ = (le‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝐻𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) Isom ≤ , ≲ (ran 𝐺, ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Axiom | ax-xrssca 33084 | Assume the scalar component of the extended real structure is the field of the real numbers (this has to be defined in the main body of set.mm). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld = (Scalar‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Axiom | ax-xrsvsca 33085 | Assume the scalar product of the extended real structure is the extended real number multiplication operation (this has to be defined in the main body of set.mm). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ ·e = ( ·𝑠 ‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrs0 33086 | The zero of the extended real numbers. The extended real is not a group, as its addition is not associative. (cf. xaddass 13190 and df-xrs 17455), however it has a zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrslt 33087 | The "strictly less than" relation for the extended real structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ < = (lt‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrsinvgval 33088 | The inversion operation in the extended real numbers. The extended real is not a group, as its addition is not associative. (cf. xaddass 13190 and df-xrs 17455), however it has an inversion operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ* → ((invg‘ℝ*𝑠)‘𝐵) = -𝑒𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xrsmulgzz 33089 | The "multiple" function in the extended real numbers structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴(.g‘ℝ*𝑠)𝐵) = (𝐴 ·e 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xrstos 33090 | The extended real numbers form a toset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ℝ*𝑠 ∈ Toset | ||
| Theorem | xrsclat 33091 | The extended real numbers form a complete lattice. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ℝ*𝑠 ∈ CLat | ||
| Theorem | xrsp0 33092 | The poset 0 of the extended real numbers is minus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ -∞ = (0.‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrsp1 33093 | The poset 1 of the extended real numbers is plus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ +∞ = (1.‘ℝ*𝑠) | ||
| Theorem | xrge00 33094 | The zero of the extended nonnegative real numbers monoid. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞))) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0mulgnn0 33095 | The group multiple function in the extended nonnegative real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → (𝐴(.g‘(ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞)))𝐵) = (𝐴 ·e 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0addass 33096 | Associativity of extended nonnegative real addition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → ((𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵) +𝑒 𝐶) = (𝐴 +𝑒 (𝐵 +𝑒 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0addgt0 33097 | The sum of nonnegative and positive numbers is positive. See addgtge0 11627. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → 0 < (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0adddir 33098 | Right-distributivity of extended nonnegative real multiplication over addition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → ((𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵) ·e 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ·e 𝐶) +𝑒 (𝐵 ·e 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0adddi 33099 | Left-distributivity of extended nonnegative real multiplication over addition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → (𝐶 ·e (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵)) = ((𝐶 ·e 𝐴) +𝑒 (𝐶 ·e 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | xrge0npcan 33100 | Extended nonnegative real version of npcan 11391. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 +𝑒 -𝑒𝐵) +𝑒 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |