P. 331 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33001-33100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cvexchi 33001	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2 33002*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3 33003*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3i 33004*	A consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space: the ordering of Hilbert lattice elements is completely determined by the atoms they majorize. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat4i 33005*	A consequence of relative atomicity. Extensionality principle: two lattice elements are equal iff they majorize the same atoms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexch 33006	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvp 33007	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atnssm0 33008	The meet of a Hilbert lattice element and an incomparable atom is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atnemeq0 33009	The meet of distinct atoms is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atssma 33010	The meet with an atom's superset is the atom. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcv0eq 33011	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (0ℋ ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcv1 33012	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	atexch 33013	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the atom exchange property. Proposition 1(i) of [Kalmbach] p. 140. A version of this theorem related to vector analysis was originally proved by Hermann Grassmann in 1862. Also Definition 3.4-3(b) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8) (use atnemeq0 33009 to obtain atom inequality). (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atomli 33014	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition 3.2.17 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ (HAtoms ∪ {0ℋ}))
Theorem	atoml2i 33015	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition P8(ii) of [BeltramettiCassinelli1] p. 400. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	atordi 33016	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvatlem 33017	Lemma for atcvati 33018. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvati 33018	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat2i 33019	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atord 33020	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvat2 33021	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
20.8.5  Irreducibility
Theorem	chirredlem1 33022*	Lemma for chirredi 33026. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑝 ∩ (⊥‘𝑟)) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	chirredlem2 33023*	Lemma for chirredi 33026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → ((⊥‘𝑟) ∩ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞)) = 𝑞)
Theorem	chirredlem3 33024*	Lemma for chirredi 33026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑟 = 𝑝))
Theorem	chirredlem4 33025*	Lemma for chirredi 33026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 = 𝑝 ∨ 𝑟 = 𝑞))
Theorem	chirredi 33026*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ)
Theorem	chirred 33027*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ))
20.8.6  Atoms (cont.)
Theorem	atcvat3i 33028	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → (((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat4i 33029*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑥))))
Theorem	atdmd 33030	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(c) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd 33031	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(b) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd2 33032	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. Part of Exercise 6 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atabsi 33033	Absorption of an incomparable atom. Similar to Exercise 7.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atabs2i 33034	Absorption of an incomparable atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴))
20.8.7  Modular symmetry
Theorem	mdsymlem1 33035*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem2 33036*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem3 33037*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdsymlem4 33038*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. This is the forward direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem5 33039*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝑞 = 𝑝 → ((𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (((𝑐 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑐) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑐 → 𝑝 ⊆ ((𝑐 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴))))))
Theorem	mdsymlem6 33040*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem7 33041*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdsymlem8 33042*	Lemma for mdsymi 33043. Lemma 4(ii) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵))
Theorem	mdsymi 33043	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsym 33044	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsym 33045	Dual M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴))
Theorem	atdmd2 33046	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdii 33047	If the subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed, then the elements are a dual modular pair. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	cmmdi 33048	Commuting subspaces form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmdmdi 33049	Commuting subspaces form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdlem 33050	Lemma for sumdmdi 33052. The span of vector 𝐶 not in the subspace sum is "trimmed off." (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 +ℋ (span‘{𝐶})) ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	sumdmdlem2 33051*	Lemma for sumdmdi 33052. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	sumdmdi 33052	The subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed iff the elements are a dual modular pair. Theorem 2 of [Holland] p. 1519. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	dmdbr4ati 33053*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr5ati 33054*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr6ati 33055*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. The modular law takes the form of the shearing identity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) = ((((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	dmdbr7ati 33056*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	mdoc1i 33057	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	mdoc2i 33058	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	dmdoc1i 33059	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	dmdoc2i 33060	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴
Theorem	mdcompli 33061	A condition equivalent to the modular pair property. Part of proof of Theorem 1.14 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdcompli 33062	A condition equivalent to the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmdin0i 33063*	If dual modular implies modular whenever meet is zero, then dual modular implies modular for arbitrary lattice elements. This theorem is needed for the remark after Lemma 7 of [Holland] p. 1524 to hold. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 𝑀ℋ* 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = 0ℋ) → 𝑥 𝑀ℋ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdjreui 33064*	A member of the sum of disjoint subspaces has a unique decomposition. Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	cdj1i 33065*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) => (2) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑣)) ≤ (𝑤 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑣)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) = 1 → 𝑥 ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)))))
Theorem	cdj3lem1 33066*	A property of "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑧)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑧)))) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	cdj3lem2 33067*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. Value of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	cdj3lem2a 33068*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. Closure of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdj3lem2b 33069*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. The first-component function 𝑆 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3lem3 33070*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. Value of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐷)
Theorem	cdj3lem3a 33071*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. Closure of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdj3lem3b 33072*	Lemma for cdj3i 33073. The second-component function 𝑇 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3i 33073*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) <=> (3) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
PART 21  SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL (USERS' MATHBOXES)
21.1  Mathboxes for user contributions
21.1.1  Mathbox guidelines
Theorem	mathbox 33074	(This theorem is a dummy placeholder for these guidelines. The label of this theorem, "mathbox", is hard-coded into the Metamath program to identify the start of the mathbox section for web page generation.) A "mathbox" is a user-contributed section that is maintained by its contributor independently from the main part of set.mm. For contributors: By making a contribution, you agree to release it into the public domain, according to the statement at the beginning of set.mm. Mathboxes are provided to help keep your work synchronized with changes in set.mm while allowing you to work independently without affecting other contributors. Even though in a sense your mathbox belongs to you, it is still part of the shared body of knowledge contained in set.mm, and occasionally other people may make maintenance edits to your mathbox for things like keeping it synchronized with the rest of set.mm, reducing proof lengths, moving your theorems to the main part of set.mm when needed, and fixing typos or other errors. If you want to preserve it the way you left it, you can keep a local copy or keep track of the GitHub commit number. Guidelines: 1. See conventions 31031 for our general style guidelines. For contributing via GitHub, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md 31031. The Metamath program command "verify markup *" will check that you have followed many of the conventions we use. 2. If at all possible, please use only nullary class constants for new definitions, for example as in df-div 12001. 3. Each $p and $a statement must be immediately preceded with the comment that will be shown on its web page description. The Metamath program "MM> WRITE SOURCE set.mm / REWRAP" command will take care of indentation conventions and line wrapping. 4. All mathbox content will be on public display and should hopefully reflect the overall quality of the website. 5. Mathboxes must be independent from one another (checked by "verify markup *"). If you need a theorem from another mathbox, typically it is moved to the main part of set.mm. New users should consult with more experienced users before doing this. 6. If a contributor is no longer active, we will continue the usual maintenance edits. As time goes on, often theorems will be moved to main or removed in favor of similar replacements. But we are also willing to maintain mathboxes in place, as work by others from years ago may form the foundation of future work; you could even argue that all of mathematics is like that. 7. For theorems of importance (for example, a Metamath 100 theorem or a dependency of one), we prefer to eventually move them out of mathboxes (although a mathbox is perfectly appropriate as proofs are being developed and refined). (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2007.) (Revised by the Metamath team, 9-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
21.2  Mathbox for Jorge Agra
Theorem	tgacne 33075	Non-collinearity of triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 implies distinct vertices 𝐴 and 𝐶. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	tgbcne 33076	Non-collinearity of triangle 𝐴𝐵𝐶 implies distinct vertices 𝐵 and 𝐶. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	cgrahlb 33077	Two null angles are congruent: if 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on one half-line from 𝐵, and 𝐷 and 𝐹 on one half-line from 𝐸, then angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ is congruent to ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩. This is GeoCoq l11_21_b ; set.mm has only the converse, cgrahl 29365 (GeoCoq l11_21_a ). Proved by copying both arms onto the target rays with hlcgrex 29112 and closing the third side by segment subtraction (tgcgrsub2 29088), so it needs no non-collinear frame. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	inagbtwn 33078	A flat sub-angle forces the containing angle flat: if 𝑊 is inside angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ and 𝐸 lies between 𝐷 and 𝑊, then 𝐸 lies between 𝐷 and 𝐹. This is GeoCoq bet_in_angle_bet. Proved by unfolding isinag 29387 and following its segment point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))
Theorem	inagcgrasubhl 33079*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (i): the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩ is **null**, 𝑊 lying on ray 𝐸𝐷. The witness is not constructed -- it is 𝑋, the target's own first arm -- and cgrahlb 33077 supplies the copied angle from the two ray degeneracies. No GeoCoq counterpart: GeoCoq's branch only locates a witness supplied by its universal statement. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgrasubbtwn 33080*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (ii): the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩ is **flat**, 𝐸 lying between 𝐷 and 𝑊. The witness is built beyond 𝑌 on the ray opposite 𝑌𝑋 with axtgsegcon 28956, and flatcgra 29362 supplies the copied angle from the two betweennesses. The in-angle conjunct goes through inagbtwn 33078, which carries the flatness up to the containing angle, then cgrabtwn 29364 across the congruence and isinagd 29388 on the target. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgrabtwn 33081*	In-angle transport, degenerate branch (iii): the containing angle is **flat** while the sub-angle is not. This is the 𝑥 = 𝐸 disjunct of isinag 29387, which the non-degenerate spine cannot reach. Unlike branches (i) and (ii) the copied angle must be *constructed*: the congruence hypothesis relates 𝑊 to nothing on the target side, and acopy 29371 needs a point off line 𝑋𝑌 to pick a side, which the collinear 𝑍 cannot be. ncoltgdim2 29058 takes the dimension from this branch's own non-collinearity and tglowdim2ln 29150 produces that point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	iscgrag 33082*	Ray normalization: an angle congruence yields two points on the target rays carrying a full triangle congruence, together with the two arm lengths. This is the forward direction of iscgra 29346 (Schwabhauser 11.3) repackaged -- nothing is constructed; the distances are read off the cgrG with cgr3simp1 29013 and cgr3simp2 29014. No non-degeneracy hypothesis is needed or wanted: cgrA carries vertex distinctness intrinsically (cgrane1 29349 through cgrane4 29352), and an extra hypothesis would obstruct the degenerate branches. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ((⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹) ∧ ((𝐸 − 𝑥) = (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∧ (𝐸 − 𝑦) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))))
Theorem	cgrgptxfr 33083*	Transfer a segment point across a triangle congruence: given ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩cgrG⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑍”⟩ and 𝐽 between 𝐴 and 𝐶, the corresponding point on (𝑋𝐼𝑍) exists, with its betweenness, its two distances and the sub-triangle congruence. GeoCoq reaches this through l4_6 and cong2_conga_cong ; here cgrg3col4 29402 (Schwabhauser 11.28) constructs the point with every pairwise distance and tgbtwnxfr 29023 -- which *is* l4_6 -- supplies the image betweenness. The 𝐴 = 𝐶 case takes cgrg3col4 29402's right disjunct, since tgellng 29046 needs 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 and cgrA does not supply it. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑦”⟩) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐽) = (𝑋 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝐽 − 𝐶) = (𝑦 − 𝑍))))
Theorem	inagcgratrgmain 33084	In-angle transport, the non-degenerate main case, with its three constructions carried as hypotheses: 𝐽 the segment point from isinag 29387, 𝑆 and 𝑇 the normalized target arms from iscgrag 33082, and 𝑄 the transferred point from cgrgptxfr 33083. Concludes the body of cgrainag 33090's existential at the witness 𝑄. **No acopy 29371 and no half-plane fact**: the witness is the transferred point, not a fresh angle copy, which is what removes the non-collinearity obligations. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑆𝐼𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑄”⟩)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑄”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgw 33085*	inagcgratrgmain 33084 with the existential introduced at its own witness 𝑄. Split out so that the substitution instance is built once, at the top level, rather than under the existential eliminations that produce 𝑆, 𝑇 and 𝑄. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑆𝐼𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐽”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑄”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgxfr 33086*	In-angle transport with the target arms already normalized to 𝑆 and 𝑇: cgrgptxfr 33083 transfers the segment point 𝐽 to a point of (𝑆𝐼𝑇), and that one existential is eliminated here. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇(𝐾‘𝑌)𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑆𝑌𝑇”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgncol 33087*	In-angle transport once the segment point 𝐽 of isinag 29387 is on the ray 𝐸𝑊: iscgrag 33082 normalizes the target arms and its two existentials are eliminated here, leaving inagcgratrgxfr 33086 to do the transfer. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inagcgratrgn 33088*	In-angle transport, non-collinear case: unfold isinag 29387, eliminate its segment-point existential, and dispatch on the disjunct it carries -- 𝑥 = 𝐸 to inagcgrabtwn 33081, 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑊 to inagcgratrgncol 33087. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	inaglea 33089	If 𝐶 lies inside angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩, then angle ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ is less than or equal to ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑌”⟩)
Theorem	cgrainag 33090*	Target-side in-angle transport: if 𝑊 lies inside angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ and that angle is congruent to ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩, then some point inside ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ makes ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩ congruent to the sub-angle ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩. The geometric core of leawittrg 33091. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	leawittrg 33091*	Target-side ≤∠ witness transport: move a witness inside ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ across a congruent target angle ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩, carrying the angle ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩ copied at that witness with it. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑊”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑣(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑣”⟩))
Theorem	leacgra2 33092	Target-side ≤∠ transport: replacing the larger angle by a congruent angle preserves the angle order. Proved from leawittrg 33091 and isleag 29396, the witness form of ≤∠. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leacgra1 33093	Source-side ≤∠ transport: replacing the smaller angle by a congruent angle preserves the angle order. The counterpart of leacgra2 33092, proved directly from the witness form of ≤∠ (isleag 29396, isleagd 29397). (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩(≤∠‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	leacgra 33094	GeoCoq l11_30 analogue: ≤∠ is preserved when both compared angles are replaced by congruent angles. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩ ≤ ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩)
Theorem	tgmircgrg 33095	Reflecting 𝐵 through the midpoint of 𝐴 and 𝐶 carries triangle 𝐶𝐴𝐵 onto 𝐴𝐶𝑃, where 𝑃 is the reflected point. The dimension condition the mid* family carries is discharged from the non-collinearity through ncoltgdim2 29058, not taken as a hypothesis. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶(((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)”⟩)
Theorem	tgmircgra 33096	The angle congruence the exterior-angle theorem opens with: the interior angle at 𝐴 in triangle 𝐶𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the angle at 𝐶 in the midpoint-reflected triangle. This is cgrcgra 29358 over tgmircgrg 33095; the vertex distinctnesses come from the non-collinearity via tgbcne 33076 and tgacne 33075. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶(((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)”⟩)
Theorem	tgextamirn 33097	The midpoint-reflected point is off line 𝐴𝐶. If it were on that line, mirln 29178-- whose centre-on-the-line hypothesis is the midpoint, itself on 𝐴𝐶-- would put its reflection there too, and mirmir 29164 says that reflection is 𝐵, contradicting the triangle's non-collinearity. This is the strengthening inA cannot give: it is what turns "inside the angle" into an open half-plane fact. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶))
Theorem	tgextancd 33098	The target-side non-collinearity of the exterior angle. Line 𝐶𝐷 is line 𝐶𝐵-- 𝐶 lies between 𝐵 and 𝐷, and 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷-- so 𝐴 is off it exactly because the triangle is non-degenerate. This is acopyeu 29372's acopy.2 frame hypothesis in tgextancgra 33104, and it is what excludes isinag 29387's 𝑥 = 𝐶 branch in tgextahp 33103. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	tgextahpl 33099	The generic open half-plane core. From a point 𝑋 between 𝐴 and 𝐷 that is on the half-line from 𝐶 through 𝑊, with 𝑊 off line 𝐴𝐶, both 𝑋 and 𝐷 and both 𝑋 and 𝑊 land on the same side of line 𝐴𝐶 (two colhp 29278 applications), and hpgcom 29275 / hpgtr 29276 compose them. 𝑋 ≠ 𝐶 is read off .xk by hlne1 29101, so no 𝑥 = 𝐶 case reaches here. The $d s are on proof dummies only -- colhp 29278's class abstraction needs its own bound variables -- so nothing propagates to callers. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐶)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴𝐿𝐶))𝐷)
Theorem	tgextalem1inag 33100	The point obtained by reflecting 𝐵 through the midpoint of 𝐴 and 𝐶 lies inside the exterior angle ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩. Proved by Pasch on the midpoint and the extension, turned into an in-angle statement with isinagd 29388 and moved from ray 𝐶𝑀 to ray 𝐶𝐴 by inaghl 29394. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐶))‘𝐵)(inA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩)