P. 399 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39801-39900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cytpfn 39801	Functionality of the cyclotomic polynomial sequence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ CytP Fn ℕ
Theorem	cytpval 39802*	Substitutions for the Nth cyclotomic polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ((mulGrp‘ℂfld) ↾s (ℂ ∖ {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (od‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (mulGrp‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (CytP‘𝑁) = (𝑄 Σg (𝑟 ∈ (◡𝑂 “ {𝑁}) ↦ (𝑋 − (𝐴‘𝑟)))))
20.29.49  Miscellaneous topology
Theorem	fgraphopab 39803*	Express a function as a subset of the Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑎) = 𝑏)})
Theorem	fgraphxp 39804*	Express a function as a subset of the Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘𝑥)})
Theorem	hausgraph 39805	The graph of a continuous function into a Hausdorff space is closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Haus ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾)) → 𝐹 ∈ (Clsd‘(𝐽 ×t 𝐾)))
Syntax	ctopsep 39806	The class of separable toplogies.
class TopSep
Syntax	ctoplnd 39807	The class of Lindelöf toplogies.
class TopLnd
Definition	df-topsep 39808*	A topology is separable iff it has a countable dense subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jan-2015.)
⊢ TopSep = {𝑗 ∈ Top ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗(𝑥 ≼ ω ∧ ((cls‘𝑗)‘𝑥) = ∪ 𝑗)}
Definition	df-toplnd 39809*	A topology is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a countable subcover. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jan-2015.)
⊢ TopLnd = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(𝑧 ≼ ω ∧ ∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧))}
20.30  Mathbox for Jon Pennant
Theorem	iocunico 39810	Split an open interval into two pieces at point B, Co-author TA. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 8-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,]𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))
Theorem	iocinico 39811	The intersection of two sets that meet at a point is that point. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 12-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,]𝐵) ∩ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = {𝐵})
Theorem	iocmbl 39812	An open-below, closed-above real interval is measurable. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 12-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴(,]𝐵) ∈ dom vol)
Theorem	cnioobibld 39813*	A bounded, continuous function on an open bounded interval is integrable. The function must be bounded. For a counterexample, consider 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ (1 / 𝑥)). See cniccibl 24435 for closed bounded intervals. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℂ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1)
Theorem	itgpowd 39814*	The integral of a monomial on a closed bounded interval of the real line. Co-authors TA and MC. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 31-May-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫(𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑥↑𝑁) d𝑥 = (((𝐵↑(𝑁 + 1)) − (𝐴↑(𝑁 + 1))) / (𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	arearect 39815	The area of a rectangle whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes in (ℝ × ℝ) is its width multiplied by its height. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐴[,]𝐵) × (𝐶[,]𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (area‘𝑆) = ((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))
Theorem	areaquad 39816*	The area of a quadrilateral with two sides which are parallel to the y-axis in (ℝ × ℝ) is its width multiplied by the average height of its higher edge minus the average height of its lower edge. Co-author TA. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐸    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ≤ 𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐶 + (((𝑥 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝐸 + (((𝑥 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐹 − 𝐸)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑈[,]𝑉))}    ⇒   ⊢ (area‘𝑆) = ((((𝐹 + 𝐸) / 2) − ((𝐷 + 𝐶) / 2)) · (𝐵 − 𝐴))
20.31  Mathbox for Richard Penner
20.31.1  Short Studies
20.31.1.1  Additional work on conditional logical operator
Theorem	ifpan123g 39817	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∧ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ (((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜂))))
Theorem	ifpan23 39818	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜏)) ↔ if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃), (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpdfor2 39819	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifporcor 39820	Corollary of commutation of or. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpdfan2 39821	Define and with conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpancor 39822	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfor 39823	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator and true. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfan 39824	Define and with conditional logic operator and false. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpbi2 39825	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜑, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi3 39826	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim1 39827	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot 39828	Restate negated wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊥, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpid2 39829	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpim2 39830	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ⊤, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi23 39831	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜏, 𝜑, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpdfbi 39832	Define biimplication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor 39833	Restatement of biid 263. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpbicor 39834	Corollary of commutation of biimplication. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpxorcor 39835	Corollary of commutation of biimplication. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi1 39836	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpnot23 39837	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnotnotb 39838	Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnorcor 39839	Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnancor 39840	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot23b 39841	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor2 39842	Restatement of biid 263. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpnot23c 39843	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnot23d 39844	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpdfnan 39845	Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpdfxor 39846	Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbi12 39847	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbi13 39848	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi123 39849	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)))
Theorem	ifpidg 39850	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpid3g 39851	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpid2g 39852	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpid1g 39853	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim23g 39854	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpim3 39855	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim1 39856	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim4 39857	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim2 39858	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim123g 39859	Implication of conditional logical operators. The right hand side is basically conjunctive normal form which is useful in proofs. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜂)))))
Theorem	ifpim1g 39860	Implication of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	ifp1bi 39861	Substitute the first element of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒))) ∧ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpbi1b 39862	When the first variable is irrelevant, it can be replaced. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpimimb 39863	Factor conditional logic operator over implication in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpororb 39864	Factor conditional logic operator over disjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∨ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpananb 39865	Factor conditional logic operator over conjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpnannanb 39866	Factor conditional logic operator over nand in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊼ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊼ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpor123g 39867	Disjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∨ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜂)))))
Theorem	ifpimim 39868	Consequnce of implication. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbibib 39869	Factor conditional logic operator over biimplication in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒), (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpxorxorb 39870	Factor conditional logic operator over xor in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊻ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
20.31.1.2  Sophisms
Theorem	rp-fakeimass 39871	A special case where implication appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeanorass 39872	A special case where a mixture of and and or appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeoranass 39873	A special case where a mixture of or and and appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeinunass 39874	A special case where a mixture of intersection and union appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
Theorem	rp-fakeuninass 39875	A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
20.31.1.3  Finite Sets Membership in the class of finite sets can be expressed in many ways.
Theorem	rp-isfinite5 39876*	A set is said to be finite if it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0. (Contributed by RP, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	rp-isfinite6 39877*	A set is said to be finite if it is either empty or it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ. (Contributed by RP, 10-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴))
20.31.1.4  General Observations
Theorem	intabssd 39878*	When for each element 𝑦 there is a subset 𝐴 which may substituted for 𝑥 such that 𝑦 satisfying 𝜒 implies 𝑥 satisfies 𝜓 then the intersection of all 𝑥 that satisfy 𝜓 is a subclass the intersection of all 𝑦 that satisfy 𝜒. (Contributed by RP, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	eu0 39879*	There is only one empty set. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	epelon2 39880	Over the ordinal numbers, one may define the relation 𝐴 E 𝐵 iff 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 and one finds that, under this ordering, On is a well-ordered class, see epweon 7491. This is a weak form of epelg 5461 which only requires that we know 𝐵 to be a set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ontric3g 39881*	For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ On, one and only one of the following hold: 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦, 𝑦 = 𝑥, or 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥. This is a transparent strict trichotomy. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
Theorem	dfsucon 39882*	𝐴 is called a successor ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal and not the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	snen1g 39883	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one iff its content is a set. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	snen1el 39884	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one if its content is an element of it. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	sn1dom 39885	A singleton is dominated by ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴} ≼ 1o
Theorem	pr2dom 39886	An unordered pair is dominated by ordinal two. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o
Theorem	tr3dom 39887	An unordered triple is dominated by ordinal three. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ≼ 3o
Theorem	ensucne0 39888	A class equinumerous to a successor is never empty. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 16-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ensucne0OLD 39889	A class equinumerous to a successor is never empty. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	nndomog 39890	Cardinal ordering agrees with ordinal number ordering when the smaller number is a natural number. Compare with nndomo 8706 when both are natural numbers. (Originally by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) (Contributed by RP, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfom6 39891	Let ω be defined to be the union of the set of all finite ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ω = ∪ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	infordmin 39892	ω is the smallest infinite ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ Fin)ω ⊆ 𝑥
Theorem	iscard4 39893	Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 8-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran card)
Theorem	iscard5 39894*	Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by RP, 8-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elrncard 39895*	Let us define a cardinal number to be an element 𝐴 ∈ On such that 𝐴 is not equipotent with any 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran card ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	harsucnn 39896	The next cardinal after a finite ordinal is the successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (har‘𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	harval3 39897*	(har‘𝐴) is the least cardinal that is greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by RP, 4-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ ran card ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	harval3on 39898*	For any ordinal number 𝐴 let (har‘𝐴) denote the least cardinal that is greater than 𝐴; (Contributed by RP, 4-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ ran card ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	en2pr 39899*	A class is equinumerous to ordinal two iff it is a pair of distinct sets. (Contributed by RP, 11-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 2o ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))
Theorem	pr2cv 39900	If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then both parts are sets. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))