P. 399 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39801-39900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lncmp 39801	If two lines are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑀‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	2lnat 39802	Two intersecting lines intersect at an atom. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2atm2atN 39803	Two joins with a common atom have a nonzero meet. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	2llnma1b 39804	Generalization of 2llnma1 39805. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑃)
Theorem	2llnma1 39805	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑄)
Theorem	2llnma3r 39806	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2 39807	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2rN 39808	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
21.28.13  Construction of a vector space from a Hilbert lattice
Theorem	cdlema1N 39809	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdlema2N 39810	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑅 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	cdlemblem 39811	Lemma for cdlemb 39812. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 < 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢)))) → (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemb 39812*	Given two atoms not less than or equal to an element covered by 1, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Syntax	cpadd 39813	Extend class notation with projective subspace sum.
class +𝑃
Definition	df-padd 39814*	Define projective sum of two subspaces (or more generally two sets of atoms), which is the union of all lines generated by pairs of atoms from each subspace. Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. For convenience, our definition is generalized to apply to empty sets. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ +𝑃 = (𝑙 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙), 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙) ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑙) ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝(le‘𝑙)(𝑞(join‘𝑙)𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddfval 39815*	Projective subspace sum operation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → + = (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴, 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddval 39816*	Projective subspace sum operation value. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)}))
Theorem	elpadd 39817*	Member of a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)))))
Theorem	elpaddn0 39818*	Member of projective subspace sum of nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	paddvaln0N 39819*	Projective subspace sum operation value for nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})
Theorem	elpaddri 39820	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpaddatriN 39821	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))
Theorem	elpaddat 39822*	Membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	elpaddatiN 39823*	Consequence of membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑅 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	elpadd2at 39824	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	elpadd2at2 39825	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	paddunssN 39826	Projective subspace sum includes the set union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpadd0 39827	Member of projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddval0 39828	Projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌))
Theorem	padd01 39829	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + ∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	padd02 39830	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddcom 39831	Projective subspace sum commutes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddssat 39832	A projective subspace sum is a set of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	sspadd1 39833	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its first summand. (ssun1 4126 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	sspadd2 39834	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its second summand. (ssun2 4127 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddss1 39835	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss1 4133 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss2 39836	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss2 4135 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑍 + 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddss12 39837	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss12 4136 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝑊) → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddasslem1 39838	Lemma for paddass 39856. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem2 39839	Lemma for paddass 39856. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem3 39840*	Lemma for paddass 39856. Restate projective space axiom ps-2 39496. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))))
Theorem	paddasslem4 39841*	Lemma for paddass 39856. Combine paddasslem1 39838, paddasslem2 39839, and paddasslem3 39840. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))
Theorem	paddasslem5 39842	Lemma for paddass 39856. Show 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 by contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) → 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧)
Theorem	paddasslem6 39843	Lemma for paddass 39856. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem7 39844	Lemma for paddass 39856. Combine paddasslem5 39842 and paddasslem6 39843. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem8 39845	Lemma for paddass 39856. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem9 39846	Lemma for paddass 39856. Combine paddasslem7 39844 and paddasslem8 39845. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem10 39847	Lemma for paddass 39856. Use paddasslem4 39841 to eliminate 𝑠 from paddasslem9 39846. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem11 39848	Lemma for paddass 39856. The case when 𝑝 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem12 39849	Lemma for paddass 39856. The case when 𝑥 = 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem13 39850	Lemma for paddass 39856. The case when 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦). (Unlike the proof in Maeda and Maeda, we don't need 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem14 39851	Lemma for paddass 39856. Remove 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧, 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, and ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) from antecedent of paddasslem10 39847, using paddasslem11 39848, paddasslem12 39849, and paddasslem13 39850. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem15 39852	Lemma for paddass 39856. Use elpaddn0 39818 to eliminate 𝑦 and 𝑧 from paddasslem14 39851. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅)) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem16 39853	Lemma for paddass 39856. Use elpaddn0 39818 to eliminate 𝑥 and 𝑟 from paddasslem15 39852. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem17 39854	Lemma for paddass 39856. The case when at least one sum argument is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem18 39855	Lemma for paddass 39856. Combine paddasslem16 39853 and paddasslem17 39854. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddass 39856	Projective subspace sum is associative. Equation 16.2.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. In our version, the subspaces do not have to be nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd12N 39857	Commutative/associative law for projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) = (𝑌 + (𝑋 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd4N 39858	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddidm 39859	Projective subspace sum is idempotent. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddclN 39860	The projective sum of two subspaces is a subspace. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	paddssw1 39861	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddssw2 39862	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss 39863	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss 4138 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍))
Theorem	pmodlem1 39864*	Lemma for pmod1i 39866. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodlem2 39865	Lemma for pmod1i 39866. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmod1i 39866	The modular law holds in a projective subspace. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmod2iN 39867	Dual of the modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑍 ⊆ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmodN 39868	The modular law for projective subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍))) = ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodl42N 39869	Lemma derived from modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑆)) → (((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) ∩ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + ((𝑋 + 𝑍) ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑊))))
Theorem	pmapjoin 39870	The projective map of the join of two lattice elements. Part of Equation 15.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑌)) ⊆ (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	pmapjat1 39871	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑄)))
Theorem	pmapjat2 39872	The projective map of the join of an atom with a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑄) + (𝑀‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pmapjlln1 39873	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 of two atoms). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	hlmod1i 39874	A version of the modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))))
Theorem	atmod1i1 39875	Version of modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod1i1m 39876	Version of modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when an element meets an atom. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ≤ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	atmod1i2 39877	Version of modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnmod1i2 39878	Version of modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod2i1 39879	Version of modular law pmod2iN 39867 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod2i2 39880	Version of modular law pmod2iN 39867 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	llnmod2i2 39881	Version of modular law pmod1i 39866 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i1 39882	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i2 39883	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑃)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod4i1 39884	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod4i2 39885	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑃 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑋) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnexchb2lem 39886	Lemma for llnexchb2 39887. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	llnexchb2 39887	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexchb2 39353 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	llnexch2N 39888	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexch2 39355 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	dalawlem1 39889	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Special case of dath2 39755, where 𝐶 is replaced by ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)). The remaining lemmas will eliminate the conditions on the atoms imposed by dath2 39755. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem2 39890	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Utility lemma that breaks ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) into a join of two pieces. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ ((((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ∨ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇)))
Theorem	dalawlem3 39891	Lemma for dalaw 39904. First piece of dalawlem5 39893. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem4 39892	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Second piece of dalawlem5 39893. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem5 39893	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) in dalawlem1 39889. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem6 39894	Lemma for dalaw 39904. First piece of dalawlem8 39896. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem7 39895	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Second piece of dalawlem8 39896. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem8 39896	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) in dalawlem1 39889. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem9 39897	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) in dalawlem1 39889. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem10 39898	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Combine dalawlem5 39893, dalawlem8 39896, and dalawlem9 . (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ¬ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem11 39899	Lemma for dalaw 39904. First part of dalawlem13 39901. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem12 39900	Lemma for dalaw 39904. Second part of dalawlem13 39901. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑄 = 𝑅 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))