P. 453 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 45201-45300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	gbpart11 45201	The (strong) Goldbach partition of 11. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ;11 = ((3 + 3) + 5)
Theorem	6gbe 45202	6 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 6 ∈ GoldbachEven
Theorem	7gbow 45203	7 is a weak odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 7 ∈ GoldbachOddW
Theorem	8gbe 45204	8 is an even Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 8 ∈ GoldbachEven
Theorem	9gbo 45205	9 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 9 ∈ GoldbachOdd
Theorem	11gbo 45206	11 is an odd Goldbach number. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ;11 ∈ GoldbachOdd
Theorem	stgoldbwt 45207	If the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the weak ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))
Theorem	sbgoldbwt 45208*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))
Theorem	sbgoldbst 45209*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	sbgoldbaltlem1 45210	Lemma 1 for sbgoldbalt 45212: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, one of the prime summands must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ Odd ))
Theorem	sbgoldbaltlem2 45211	Lemma 2 for sbgoldbalt 45212: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, the primes must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑄 ∈ Odd )))
Theorem	sbgoldbalt 45212*	An alternate (related to the original) formulation of the binary Goldbach conjecture: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sbgoldbb 45213*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sgoldbeven3prm 45214*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then an even integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes: Since (𝑁 − 2) is even iff 𝑁 is even, there would be primes 𝑝 and 𝑞 with (𝑁 − 2) = (𝑝 + 𝑞), and therefore 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 2). (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 6 ≤ 𝑁) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))
Theorem	sbgoldbm 45215*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	mogoldbb 45216*	If the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture is valid, the (weak) binary Goldbach conjecture also holds. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sbgoldbmb 45217*	The strong binary Goldbach conjecture and the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	sbgoldbo 45218*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of three "primes" with regarding 1 to be a prime (as Goldbach did). Original text: "Es scheint wenigstens, dass eine jede Zahl, die groesser ist als 2, ein aggregatum trium numerorum primorum sey." (Goldbach, 1742). (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({1} ∪ ℙ)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑃 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	nnsum3primes4 45219*	4 is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum4primes4 45220*	4 is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum3primesprm 45221*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 3" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesprm 45222*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 4" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesgbe 45223*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesgbe 45224*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesle9 45225*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesle9 45226*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesodd 45227*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 5 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesoddALTV 45228*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 7 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘8) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	evengpop3 45229*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOddW 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	evengpoap3 45230*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOdd 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	nnsum4primeseven 45231*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesevenALTV 45232*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	wtgoldbnnsum4prm 45233*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be less than or equal to 4. See corollary 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 4. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	stgoldbnnsum4prm 45234*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbnnsum3prm 45235*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 3 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem1 45236	Lemma 1 for bgoldbtbnd 45240: the odd numbers between 7 and 13 (exclusive) are odd Goldbach numbers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (7[,);13)) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem2 45237*	Lemma 2 for bgoldbtbnd 45240. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘(𝐼 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem3 45238*	Lemma 3 for bgoldbtbnd 45240. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ 4 < 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem4 45239*	Lemma 4 for bgoldbtbnd 45240. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑋 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))
Theorem	bgoldbtbnd 45240*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to an integer 𝑁, and there is a series ("ladder") of primes with a difference of at most 𝑁 up to an integer 𝑀, then the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to 𝑀, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4 with N = 4 x 10^18, taken from [OeSilva], and M = 8.875 x 10^30. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑀) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Axiom	ax-bgbltosilva 45241	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all even numbers less than or equal to 4x10^18, see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ (4 · (;10↑;18))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven )
Axiom	ax-tgoldbachgt 45242*	Temporary duplicate of tgoldbachgt 32652, provided as "axiom" as long as this theorem is in the mathbox of Thierry Arnoux: Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtALTV 45243*	Variant of Thierry Arnoux's tgoldbachgt 32652 using the symbols Odd and GoldbachOdd: The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for large odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers greater than a fixed 𝑚). This is proven by Helfgott (see section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 70) for 𝑚 = 10^27. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	bgoldbachlt 45244*	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small even numbers (i.e. for all even numbers less than or equal to a fixed big 𝑚). This is verified for m = 4 x 10^18 by Oliveira e Silva, see ax-bgbltosilva 45241. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((4 · (;10↑;18)) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))
Axiom	ax-hgprmladder 45245	There is a partition ("ladder") of primes from 7 to 8.8 x 10^30 with parts ("rungs") having lengths of at least 4 and at most N - 4, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑓 ∈ (RePart‘𝑑)(((𝑓‘0) = 7 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = ;13 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑑) = (;89 · (;10↑;29))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑑)((𝑓‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖)) < ((4 · (;10↑;18)) − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖))))
Theorem	tgblthelfgott 45246	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all odd numbers less than 8.8 x 10^30 (actually 8.875694 x 10^30, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4, using bgoldbachlt 45244, ax-hgprmladder 45245 and bgoldbtbnd 45240. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < (;88 · (;10↑;29))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	tgoldbachlt 45247*	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers less than a fixed big 𝑚 greater than 8 x 10^30). This is verified for m = 8.875694 x 10^30 by Helfgott, see tgblthelfgott 45246. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((8 · (;10↑;30)) < 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	tgoldbach 45248	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid. Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2. This follows from tgoldbachlt 45247 and ax-tgoldbachgt 45242. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
20.41.15  Graph theory (extension)
20.41.15.1  Isomorphic graphs In the following, a general definition of the isomorphy relation for graphs and specializations for simple hypergraphs (isomushgr 45257) and simple pseudographs (isomuspgr 45265) are provided. The latter corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3). It is shown that the isomorphy relation for graphs is an equivalence relation (isomgrref 45266, isomgrsym 45267, isomgrtr 45270). Fianlly, isomorphic graphs with different representations are studied (strisomgrop 45271, ushrisomgr 45272). Maybe more important than graph isomorphy is the notion of graph isomorphism, which can be defined as in df-grisom 45251. Then 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) resp. 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) ≠ ∅. Notice that there can be multiple isomorphisms between two graphs (let ⟨{𝐴, 𝐵}, {{𝐴, 𝐵}}⟩ and ⟨{{𝑀, 𝑁}, {{𝑀, 𝑁}}⟩ be two graphs with two vertices and one edge, then 𝐴 ↦ 𝑀, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑁 and 𝐴 ↦ 𝑁, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑀 are two different isomorphisms between these graphs). Another approach could be to define a category of graphs (there are maybe multiple ones), where graph morphisms are couples consisting in a function on vertices and a function on edges with required compatibilities, as used in the definition of GrIsom. And then, a graph isomorphism is defined as an isomorphism in the category of graphs (something like "GraphIsom = ( Iso ` GraphCat )" ). Then general category theory theorems could be used, e.g., to show that graph isomorphy is an equivalence relation.
Syntax	cgrisom 45249	Extend class notation to include the graph ispmorphisms.
class GrIsom
Syntax	cisomgr 45250	Extend class notation to include the isomorphy relation for graphs.
class IsomGr
Definition	df-grisom 45251*	Define the class of all isomorphisms between two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Dec-2022.)
⊢ GrIsom = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ (𝑓:(Vtx‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝑥)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝑥)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝑦)‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))})
Definition	df-isomgr 45252*	Define the isomorphy relation for graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ IsomGr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(Vtx‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝑥)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝑥)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝑦)‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))}
Theorem	isomgrrel 45253	The isomorphy relation for graphs is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ Rel IsomGr
Theorem	isomgr 45254*	The isomorphy relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	isisomgr 45255*	Implications of two graphs being isomorphic. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	isomgreqve 45256	A set is isomorphic to a hypergraph if it has the same vertices and the same edges. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ ((Vtx‘𝐴) = (Vtx‘𝐵) ∧ (iEdg‘𝐴) = (iEdg‘𝐵))) → 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵)
Theorem	isomushgr 45257*	The isomorphy relation for two simple hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ USHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒)))))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem1 45258*	Lemma 1 for isomuspgr 45265. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) ∧ 𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) ∧ (𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒))) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉)) → ({(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾 → {𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2a 45259*	Lemma 1 for isomuspgrlem2 45264. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝐹 “ 𝑒) = (𝐺‘𝑒))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2b 45260*	Lemma 2 for isomuspgrlem2 45264. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸⟶𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2c 45261*	Lemma 3 for isomuspgrlem2 45264. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–1-1→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2d 45262*	Lemma 4 for isomuspgrlem2 45264. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–onto→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2e 45263*	Lemma 5 for isomuspgrlem2 45264. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2 45264*	Lemma 2 for isomuspgr 45265. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) ∧ 𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒))))
Theorem	isomuspgr 45265*	The isomorphy relation for two simple pseudographs. This corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))))
Theorem	isomgrref 45266	The isomorphy relation is reflexive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐺)
Theorem	isomgrsym 45267	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 → 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrsymb 45268	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrtrlem 45269*	Lemma for isomgrtr 45270. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (((((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑓:(Vtx‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐵) ∧ 𝑣:(Vtx‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐶)) ∧ (𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))) ∧ (𝑤:dom (iEdg‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐶) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐵)(𝑣 “ ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘(𝑤‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑗 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)((𝑣 ∘ 𝑓) “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑗)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘((𝑤 ∘ 𝑔)‘𝑗)))
Theorem	isomgrtr 45270	The isomorphy relation is transitive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐶) → 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐶))
Theorem	strisomgrop 45271	A graph represented as an extensible structure with vertices as base set and indexed edges is isomorphic to a hypergraph represented as ordered pair with the same vertices and edges. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑉⟩, ⟨(.ef‘ndx), 𝐸⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
Theorem	ushrisomgr 45272	A simple hypergraph (with arbitrarily indexed edges) is isomorphic to a graph with the same vertices and the same edges, indexed by the edges themselves. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, ( I ↾ 𝐸)⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
20.41.15.2  Loop-free graphs - extension
Theorem	1hegrlfgr 45273*	A graph 𝐺 with one hyperedge joining at least two vertices is a loop-free graph. (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) = {⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺):{𝐴}⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
20.41.15.3  Walks - extension
Syntax	cupwlks 45274	Extend class notation with walks (of a pseudograph).
class UPWalks
Definition	df-upwlks 45275*	Define the set of all walks (in a pseudograph), called "simple walks" in the following. According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A walk of length k in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, v0 , e0 , v1 , e1 , v2 , ... , v(k-1) , e(k-1) , v(k) which begins and ends with vertices. If the graph is undirected, then the endpoints of e(i) are v(i) and v(i+1)." According to Bollobas: " A walk W in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges x0 , e1 , x1 , e2 , ... , e(l) , x(l) where e(i) = x(i-1)x(i), 0<i<=l.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 4. Therefore, a walk can be represented by two mappings f from { 1 , ... , n } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Although this definition is also applicable for arbitrary hypergraphs, it allows only walks consisting of not proper hyperedges (i.e. edges connecting at most two vertices). Therefore, it should be used for pseudographs only. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ UPWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	upwlksfval 45276*	The set of simple walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (UPWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐼‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	isupwlk 45277*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	isupwlkg 45278*	Generalization of isupwlk 45277: Conditions for two classes to represent a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upwlkbprop 45279	Basic properties of a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))
Theorem	upwlkwlk 45280	A simple walk is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlk 45281	In a pseudograph, a walk is a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) → 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlkb 45282	In a pseudograph, the definitions for a walk and a simple walk are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	upgrisupwlkALT 45283*	Alternate proof of upgriswlk 28018 using the definition of UPGraph and related theorems. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
20.41.15.4  Edges of graphs expressed as sets of unordered pairs
Theorem	upgredgssspr 45284	The set of edges of a pseudograph is a subset of the set of unordered pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (Pairs‘(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	uspgropssxp 45285*	The set 𝐺 of "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices is a subset of a Cartesian product. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 45295. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑊 × 𝑃))
Theorem	uspgrsprfv 45286*	The value of the function 𝐹 which maps a "simple pseudograph" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices to the set of edges (i.e. range of the edge function) of the graph. Solely for 𝐺 as defined here, the function 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" and the subsets of the set of pairs 𝑃 over the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices, see uspgrbispr 45292. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	uspgrsprf 45287*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺⟶𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprf1 45288*	The mapping 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺–1-1→𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprfo 45289*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 onto the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrsprf1o 45290*	The mapping 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. See also the comments on uspgrbisymrel 45295. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrex 45291*	The class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	uspgrbispr 45292*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrspren 45293*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑃 of subsets of the set of pairs over the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrymrelen 45294*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 45295. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrel 45295*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉. The simple pseudographs, which are graphs without hyper- or multiedges, but which may contain loops, are expressed as ordered pairs of the vertices and the edges (as proper or improper unordered pairs of vertices, not as indexed edges!) in this theorem. That class 𝐺 of such simple pseudographs is a set (if 𝑉 is a set, see uspgrex 45291) of equivalence classes of graphs abstracting from the index sets of their edge functions. Solely for this abstraction, there is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" as members of 𝐺 and the symmetric relations 𝑅 on the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices. This theorem would not hold for 𝐺 = {𝑔 ∈ USPGraph ∣ (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉} and even not for 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∈ USPGraph)}, because these are much bigger classes. (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 16-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrelALT 45296*	Alternate proof of uspgrbisymrel 45295 not using the definition of equinumerosity. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
20.41.16  Monoids (extension)
20.41.16.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	ovn0dmfun 45297	If a class operation value for two operands is not the empty set, then the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6809. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})))
Theorem	xpsnopab 45298*	A Cartesian product with a singleton expressed as ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ({𝑋} × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	xpiun 45299*	A Cartesian product expressed as indexed union of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	ovn0ssdmfun 45300*	If a class' operation value for two operands is not the empty set, the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6809. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑎𝐹𝑏) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐷 × 𝐸) ⊆ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ (𝐷 × 𝐸))))