| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 338 of 498) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30847) |
(30848-32370) |
(32371-49794) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | minplyirred 33701 | A nonzero minimal polynomial is irreducible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ (Irred‘𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | irngnminplynz 33702 | Integral elements have nonzero minimal polynomials. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | minplym1p 33703 | A minimal polynomial is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | minplynzm1p 33704 | If a minimal polynomial is nonzero, then it is monic. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘(Poly1‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑍) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | minplyelirng 33705 | If the minimial polynomial 𝐹 of an element 𝑋 of a field 𝑅 has nonnegative degree, then 𝑋 is integral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑅 minPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(𝑅 ↾s 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 IntgRing 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | irredminply 33706 | An irreducible, monic, annihilating polynomial is the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑂‘𝐺)‘𝐴) = 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Irred‘𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Monic1p‘(𝐸 ↾s 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem1 33707 | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 ↾s 𝐹) = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem2 33708* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. Both the ring of polynomials 𝑃 and the field 𝐿 generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴 can be considered as modules over the elements of 𝐹. Then, the evaluation map 𝐺, mapping polynomials to their evaluation at 𝐴, is a module homomorphism between those modules. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃 LMHom ((subringAlg ‘𝐿)‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem3 33709* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. The quotient 𝑃 / 𝑍 of the vector space 𝑃 of polynomials by the subspace 𝑍 of polynomials annihilating 𝐴 is itself a vector space. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem4 33710* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. By lmhmqusker 33388, the surjective module homomorphism 𝐺 described in algextdeglem2 33708 induces an isomorphism with the quotient space. Therefore, the dimension of that quotient space 𝑃 / 𝑍 is the degree of the algebraic field extension. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (𝐿[:]𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem5 33711* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. The subspace 𝑍 of annihilators of 𝐴 is a principal ideal generated by the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{(𝑀‘𝐴)})) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem6 33712* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. By r1pquslmic 33576, the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is isomorphic with the quotient ring 𝑄. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘𝑄) = (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem7 33713* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. The polynomials 𝑋 of lower degree than the minimal polynomial are left unchanged when taking the remainder of the division by that minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑋) = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeglem8 33714* | Lemma for algextdeg 33715. The dimension of the univariate polynomial remainder ring (𝐻 “s 𝑃) is the degree of the minimal polynomial. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐸 evalSub1 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑂‘𝑝)‘𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ [𝑥](𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (◡𝐺 “ {(0g‘𝐿)}) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑄) ↦ ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝑝)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (rem1p‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑝𝑅(𝑀‘𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (◡(deg1‘𝐾) “ (-∞[,)(𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (dim‘(𝐻 “s 𝑃)) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | algextdeg 33715 | The degree of an algebraic field extension (noted [𝐿:𝐾]) is the degree of the minimal polynomial 𝑀(𝐴), whereas 𝐿 is the field generated by 𝐾 and the algebraic element 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐸 minPoly 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐸 IntgRing 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) = (𝐷‘(𝑀‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | rtelextdg2lem 33716 | Lemma for rtelextdg2 33717: If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then the degree of its field extension is at most 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋}))) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 ) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (var1‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊕ = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ ⊗ = (.r‘𝑃) & ⊢ ∧ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃)) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (algSc‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((2 ∧ 𝑌) ⊕ (((𝑈‘𝐴) ⊗ 𝑌) ⊕ (𝑈‘𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿[:]𝐾) ≤ 2) | ||
| Theorem | rtelextdg2 33717 | If an element 𝑋 is a solution of a quadratic equation, then it is either in the base field, or the degree of its field extension is exactly 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s (𝐸 fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋}))) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐸) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝐸) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐸) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2 ↑ 𝑋) + ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵)) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∨ (𝐿[:]𝐾) = 2)) | ||
| Theorem | fldext2chn 33718* | In a non-empty chain 𝑇 of quadratic field extensions, the degree of the final extension is always a power of two. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑒) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑓) & ⊢ < = {〈𝑓, 𝑒〉 ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( < Chain(SubDRing‘𝑊))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (𝑇‘0)) = 𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s (lastS‘𝑇)) = 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿/FldExt𝑄 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛))) | ||
This section defines the set of constructible points as complex numbers which can be drawn starting from two points (we take 0 and 1), and taking intersections of circles and lines. This construction is useful for proving the impossibility of doubling the cube (2sqr3nconstr 33771), and of angle trisection (cos9thpinconstr 33781) | ||
| Syntax | cconstr 33719 | Extend class notation with the set of constructible points. |
| class Constr | ||
| Definition | df-constr 33720* | Define the set of geometrically constructible points, by recursively adding the line-line, line-circle and circle-circle intersections constructions using points in a previous iteration. Definition 7.4. in [Stewart] p. 92 (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 19-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ Constr = ∪ (rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) “ ω) | ||
| Theorem | constrrtll 33721 | In the construction of constructible numbers, line-line intersections are solutions of linear equations, and can therefore be completely constructed. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐶 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐶)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) ≠ 0) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐴 + (((((𝐴 − 𝐶) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))) − (((∗‘𝐴) − (∗‘𝐶)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) / ((((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶)) − ((𝐵 − 𝐴) · ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐶))))) · (𝐵 − 𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | constrrtlc1 33722 | In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation, non-degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (((∗‘𝐵) − (∗‘𝐴)) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (((((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶)) − (𝐶 · 𝑄)) / 𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (-((𝐶 · (((∗‘𝐴) − (𝐴 · 𝑄)) − (∗‘𝐶))) + ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · ((∗‘𝐸) − (∗‘𝐹)))) / 𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | constrrtlc2 33723 | In the construction of constructible numbers, line-circle intersections are one of the original points, in a degenerate case. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | constrrtcclem 33724 | In the construction of constructible numbers, circle-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation. Case of non-degenerate circles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ 𝑃 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶) · (∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · (∗‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (((𝑄 − ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 + 𝐴))) − (𝑃 − ((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 + 𝐴)))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = -(((((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑃 · 𝐷)) − (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑄 · 𝐴))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | constrrtcc 33725 | In the construction of constructible numbers, circle-circle intersections are roots of a quadratic equation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ 𝑃 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶) · (∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐸 − 𝐹) · (∗‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (((𝑄 − ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 + 𝐴))) − (𝑃 − ((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 + 𝐴)))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑁 = -(((((∗‘𝐴) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑃 · 𝐷)) − (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐷 · 𝐴)) − (𝑄 · 𝐴))) / ((∗‘𝐷) − (∗‘𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑2) + ((𝑀 · 𝑋) + 𝑁)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | isconstr 33726* | Property of being a constructible number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Constr ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑚)) | ||
| Theorem | constr0 33727 | The first step of the construction of constructible numbers is the pair {0, 1}. In this theorem and the following, we use (𝐶‘𝑁) for the 𝑁-th intermediate iteration of the constructible number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶‘∅) = {0, 1} | ||
| Theorem | constrsuc 33728* | Membership in the successor step of the construction of constructible numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐶‘𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ ∧ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑋 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑋 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))))) | ||
| Theorem | constrlim 33729* | Limit step of the construction of constructible numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Lim 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝐶‘𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | constrsscn 33730* | Closure of the constructible points in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | constrsslem 33731* | Lemma for constrss 33733. This lemma requires the additional condition that 0 is a constructible number; that condition is removed in constrss 33733. (Proposed by Saveliy Skresanov, 23-JUn-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | constr01 33732* | 0 and 1 are in all steps of the construction of constructible points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {0, 1} ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | constrss 33733* | Constructed points are in the next generation constructed points. Lemma 7.3 of [Stewart] p. 91 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | constrmon 33734* | The construction of constructible numbers is monotonous, i.e. if the ordinal 𝑀 is less than the ordinal 𝑁, which is denoted by 𝑀 ∈ 𝑁, then the 𝑀-th step of the constructible numbers is included in the 𝑁-th step. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑀) ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | constrconj 33735* | If a point 𝑋 of the complex plane is constructible, so is its conjugate (∗‘𝑋). (Proposed by Saveliy Skresanov, 25-Jun-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∗‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐶‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | constrfin 33736* | Each step of the construction of constructible numbers is finite. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | constrelextdg2 33737* | If the 𝑁-th step (𝐶‘𝑁) of the construction of constuctible numbers is included in a subfield 𝐹 of the complex numbers, then any element 𝑋 of the next step (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) is either in 𝐹 or in a quadratic extension of 𝐹. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld ↾s (ℂfld fldGen (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (SubDRing‘ℂfld)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∨ (𝐿[:]𝐾) = 2)) | ||
| Theorem | constrextdg2lem 33738* | Lemma for constrextdg2 33739 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓) & ⊢ < = {〈𝑓, 𝑒〉 ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( < Chain(SubDRing‘ℂfld))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅‘0) = ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ ( < Chain(SubDRing‘ℂfld))((𝑣‘0) = ℚ ∧ (𝐶‘suc 𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑣))) | ||
| Theorem | constrextdg2 33739* | Any step (𝐶‘𝑁) of the construction of constructible numbers is contained in the last field of a tower of quadratic field extensions starting with ℚ. See Theorem 7.11 of [Stewart] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓) & ⊢ < = {〈𝑓, 𝑒〉 ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ ( < Chain(SubDRing‘ℂfld))((𝑣‘0) = ℚ ∧ (𝐶‘𝑁) ⊆ (lastS‘𝑣))) | ||
| Theorem | constrext2chnlem 33740* | Lemma for constrext2chn 33749. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑒) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑓) & ⊢ < = {〈𝑓, 𝑒〉 ∣ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ∧ (𝐸[:]𝐹) = 2)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld ↾s (ℂfld fldGen (ℚ ∪ {𝐴}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | constrfiss 33741* | For any finite set 𝐴 of constructible numbers, there is a 𝑛 -th step (𝐶‘𝑛) containing all numbers in 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ω 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶‘𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | constrllcllem 33742* | Constructible numbers are closed under line-line intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐺 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐺)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐺))) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrlccllem 33743* | Constructible numbers are closed under line-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐺)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrcccllem 33744* | Constructible numbers are closed under circle-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐺))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrcbvlem 33745* | Technical lemma for eliminating the hypothesis of constr0 33727 and co. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑜 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 = (𝑖 + (𝑜 · (𝑗 − 𝑖))) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝑘 + (𝑝 · (𝑙 − 𝑘))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑗 − 𝑖)) · (𝑙 − 𝑘))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑜 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 = (𝑖 + (𝑜 · (𝑗 − 𝑖))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑘)) = (abs‘(𝑚 − 𝑞))) ∨ ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑙 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑖)) = (abs‘(𝑗 − 𝑘)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝑙)) = (abs‘(𝑚 − 𝑞))))}), {0, 1}) = rec((𝑠 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑐 + (𝑟 · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ∧ (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝑏 − 𝑎)) · (𝑑 − 𝑐))) ≠ 0) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 = (𝑎 + (𝑡 · (𝑏 − 𝑎))) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑐)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑠 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑎)) = (abs‘(𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝑑)) = (abs‘(𝑒 − 𝑓))))}), {0, 1}) | ||
| Theorem | constrllcl 33746 | Constructible numbers are closed under line-line intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐺 + (𝑅 · (𝐷 − 𝐺)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘((∗‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐺))) ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrlccl 33747 | Constructible numbers are closed under line-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑇 · (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐺)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrcccl 33748 | Constructible numbers are closed under circle-circle intersections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑋 − 𝐷)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐹))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrext2chn 33749* | If a constructible number generates some subfield 𝐿 of ℂ, then the degree of the extension of 𝐿 over ℚ is a power of two. Theorem 7.12 of [Stewart] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (ℂfld fldGen (ℚ ∪ {𝐴})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐿[:]𝑄) = (2↑𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | constrcn 33750 | Constructible numbers are complex numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | nn0constr 33751 | Nonnegative integers are constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constraddcl 33752 | Constructive numbers are closed under complex addition. Item (1) of Theorem 7.10 of [Stewart] p. 96 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrnegcl 33753 | Constructible numbers are closed under additive inverse. Item (2) of Theorem 7.10 of [Stewart] p. 96 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | zconstr 33754 | Integers are constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrdircl 33755 | Constructible numbers are closed under taking the point on the unit circle having the same argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / (abs‘𝑋)) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | iconstr 33756 | The imaginary unit i is constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ i ∈ Constr | ||
| Theorem | constrremulcl 33757 | If two real numbers 𝑋 and 𝑌 are constructible, then, so is their product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrcjcl 33758 | Constructible numbers are closed under complex conjugate. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∗‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrrecl 33759 | Constructible numbers are closed under taking the real part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℜ‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrimcl 33760 | Constructible numbers are closed under taking the imaginary part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℑ‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrmulcl 33761 | Constructible numbers are closed under complex multiplication. Item (3) of Theorem 7.10 of [Stewart] p. 96 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrreinvcl 33762 | If a real number 𝑋 is constructible, then, so is its inverse. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / 𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrinvcl 33763 | Constructible numbers are closed under complex inverse. Item (4) of Theorem 7.10 of [Stewart] p. 96 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / 𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrcon 33764* | Contradiction of constructibility: If a complex number 𝐴 has minimal polynomial 𝐹 over ℚ of a degree that is not a power of 2, then 𝐴 is not constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘(ℂfld ↾s ℚ)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld minPoly ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐷‘𝐹) ≠ (2↑𝑛)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrsdrg 33765 | Constructible numbers form a subfield of the complex numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ Constr ∈ (SubDRing‘ℂfld) | ||
| Theorem | constrfld 33766 | The constructible numbers form a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld ↾s Constr) ∈ Field | ||
| Theorem | constrresqrtcl 33767 | If a positive real number 𝑋 is constructible, then, so is its square root. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrabscl 33768 | Constructible numbers are closed under absolute value (modulus). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | constrsqrtcl 33769 | Constructible numbers are closed under taking the square root. This is not generally the case for the cubic root operation, see 2sqr3nconstr 33771. Item (5) of Theorem 7.10 of [Stewart] p. 96 (Proposed by Saveliy Skresanov, 3-Nov-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Constr) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝑋) ∈ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | 2sqr3minply 33770 | The polynomial ((𝑋↑3) − 2) is the minimal polynomial for (2↑𝑐(1 / 3)) over ℚ, and its degree is 3. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑃) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (algSc‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((3 ↑ 𝑋) − (𝐾‘2)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (2↑𝑐(1 / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld minPoly ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ∧ (𝐷‘𝐹) = 3) | ||
| Theorem | 2sqr3nconstr 33771 | Doubling the cube is an impossible construction, i.e. the cube root of 2 is not constructible with straightedge and compass. Given a cube of edge of length one, a cube of double volume would have an edge of length (2↑𝑐(1 / 3)), however that number is not constructible. This is the first part of Metamath 100 proof #8. Theorem 7.13 of [Stewart] p. 99. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux and Saveliy Skresanov, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (2↑𝑐(1 / 3)) ∉ Constr | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem1 33772 | The polynomial ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · (𝑋↑2)) + 1)) has no integer roots. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · (𝑋↑2)) + 1)) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem2 33773 | The polynomial ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑋) + 1)) has no rational roots. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑋) + 1)) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem3 33774 | Lemma for cos9thpiminply 33778. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑂↑2) + (𝑂 + 1)) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem4 33775 | Lemma for cos9thpiminply 33778. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑍↑6) + (𝑍↑3)) = -1 | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem5 33776 | The constructed complex number 𝐴 is a root of the polynomial ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑋) + 1)). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑍 + (1 / 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴↑3) + ((-3 · 𝐴) + 1)) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminplylem6 33777 | Evaluation of the polynomial ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑋) + 1)). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑍 + (1 / 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑃) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (algSc‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((3 ↑ 𝑋) + (((𝐾‘-3) · 𝑋) + (𝐾‘1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((ℂfld evalSub1 ℚ)‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = ((𝑌↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑌) + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpiminply 33778 | The polynomial ((𝑋↑3) + ((-3 · 𝑋) + 1)) is the minimal polynomial for 𝐴 over ℚ, and its degree is 3. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑍 + (1 / 𝑍)) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑃) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (algSc‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (var1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((3 ↑ 𝑋) + (((𝐾‘-3) · 𝑋) + (𝐾‘1))) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld minPoly ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ∧ (𝐷‘𝐹) = 3) | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpinconstrlem1 33779 | The complex number 𝑂, representing an angle of (2 · π) / 3, is constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑂 ∈ Constr | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpinconstrlem2 33780 | The complex number 𝐴 is not constructible. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑍 + (1 / 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Constr | ||
| Theorem | cos9thpinconstr 33781 | Trisecting an angle is an impossible construction. Given for example 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)), which represents an angle of ((2 · π) / 3), the cube root of 𝑂 is not constructible with straightedge and compass, while 𝑂 itself is constructible. This is the second part of Metamath 100 proof #8. Theorem 7.14 of [Stewart] p. 99. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux and Saveliy Skresanov, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) / 3)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑂↑𝑐(1 / 3)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Constr ∧ 𝑍 ∉ Constr) | ||
| Theorem | trisecnconstr 33782 | Not all angles can be trisected. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Nov-2025.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑜 ∈ Constr (𝑜↑𝑐(1 / 3)) ∈ Constr | ||
| Syntax | csmat 33783 | Syntax for a function generating submatrices. |
| class subMat1 | ||
| Definition | df-smat 33784* | Define a function generating submatrices of an integer-indexed matrix. The function maps an index in ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)) into a new index in ((1...(𝑀 − 1)) × (1...(𝑁 − 1))). A submatrix is obtained by deleting a row and a column of the original matrix. Because this function re-indexes the matrix, the resulting submatrix still has the same index set for rows and columns, and its determinent is defined, unlike the current df-subma 22464. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ subMat1 = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ, 𝑙 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑚 ∘ (𝑖 ∈ ℕ, 𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ 〈if(𝑖 < 𝑘, 𝑖, (𝑖 + 1)), if(𝑗 < 𝑙, 𝑗, (𝑗 + 1))〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | smatfval 33785* | Value of the submatrix. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐾(subMat1‘𝑀)𝐿) = (𝑀 ∘ (𝑖 ∈ ℕ, 𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ 〈if(𝑖 < 𝐾, 𝑖, (𝑖 + 1)), if(𝑗 < 𝐿, 𝑗, (𝑗 + 1))〉))) | ||
| Theorem | smatrcl 33786 | Closure of the rectangular submatrix. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...(𝑀 − 1)) × (1...(𝑁 − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | smatlem 33787 | Lemma for the next theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝐼 < 𝐾, 𝐼, (𝐼 + 1)) = 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝐽 < 𝐿, 𝐽, (𝐽 + 1)) = 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼𝑆𝐽) = (𝑋𝐴𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | smattl 33788 | Entries of a submatrix, top left. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (1..^𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼𝑆𝐽) = (𝐼𝐴𝐽)) | ||
| Theorem | smattr 33789 | Entries of a submatrix, top right. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐾...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (1..^𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼𝑆𝐽) = ((𝐼 + 1)𝐴𝐽)) | ||
| Theorem | smatbl 33790 | Entries of a submatrix, bottom left. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐿...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼𝑆𝐽) = (𝐼𝐴(𝐽 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | smatbr 33791 | Entries of a submatrix, bottom right. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝐴)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m ((1...𝑀) × (1...𝑁)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (𝐾...𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (𝐿...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼𝑆𝐽) = ((𝐼 + 1)𝐴(𝐽 + 1))) | ||
| Theorem | smatcl 33792 | Closure of the square submatrix: if 𝑀 is a square matrix of dimension 𝑁 with indices in (1...𝑁), then a submatrix of 𝑀 is of dimension (𝑁 − 1). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘((1...(𝑁 − 1)) Mat 𝑅)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐾(subMat1‘𝑀)𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | matmpo 33793* | Write a square matrix as a mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑀 = (𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 ↦ (𝑖𝑀𝑗))) | ||
| Theorem | 1smat1 33794 | The submatrix of the identity matrix obtained by removing the ith row and the ith column is an identity matrix. Cf. 1marepvsma1 22470. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 1 = (1r‘((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼(subMat1‘ 1 )𝐼) = (1r‘((1...(𝑁 − 1)) Mat 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | submat1n 33795 | One case where the submatrix with integer indices, subMat1, and the general submatrix subMat, agree. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑁(subMat1‘𝑀)𝑁) = (𝑁(((1...𝑁) subMat 𝑅)‘𝑀)𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | submatres 33796 | Special case where the submatrix is a restriction of the initial matrix, and no renumbering occurs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑁(subMat1‘𝑀)𝑁) = (𝑀 ↾ ((1...(𝑁 − 1)) × (1...(𝑁 − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | submateqlem1 33797 | Lemma for submateq 33799. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ (𝐾...𝑁) ∧ (𝑀 + 1) ∈ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {𝐾}))) | ||
| Theorem | submateqlem2 33798 | Lemma for submateq 33799. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ (1..^𝐾) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {𝐾}))) | ||
| Theorem | submateq 33799* | Sufficient condition for two submatrices to be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {𝐼}) ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {𝐽})) → (𝑖𝐸𝑗) = (𝑖𝐹𝑗)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼(subMat1‘𝐸)𝐽) = (𝐼(subMat1‘𝐹)𝐽)) | ||
| Theorem | submatminr1 33800 | If we take a submatrix by removing the row 𝐼 and column 𝐽, then the result is the same on the matrix with row 𝐼 and column 𝐽 modified by the minMatR1 operator. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ((1...𝑁) Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐼(((1...𝑁) minMatR1 𝑅)‘𝑀)𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼(subMat1‘𝑀)𝐽) = (𝐼(subMat1‘𝐸)𝐽)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |