HomeTheorem List (p. 338 of 464)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 338 of 464) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29181) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29182-30704) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30705-46395) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | ssttrcl 33701 | If 𝑅 is a relation, then it is a subclass of its transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → 𝑅 ⊆ t++𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | ttrcltr 33702 | The transitive closure of a class is transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | ttrclresv 33703 | The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | ttrclco 33704 | Composition law for the transitive closure of a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | cottrcl 33705 | Composition law for the transitive closure of a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | ttrclss 33706 | If 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆 and 𝑆 is transitive, then the transitive closure of 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → t++𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | dmttrcl 33707 | The domain of a transitive closure is the same as the domain of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ dom t++𝑅 = dom 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | rnttrcl 33708 | The range of a transitive closure is the same as the range of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ran t++𝑅 = ran 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | ttrclexg 33709 | If 𝑅 is a set, then so is t++𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → t++𝑅 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | dfttrcl2 33710* | When 𝑅 is a set and a relationship, then its transitive closure can be defined by an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → t++𝑅 = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)}) | ||
| Theorem | ttrclselem1 33711* | Lemma for ttrclse 33713. Show that all finite ordinal function values of 𝐹 are subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ttrclselem2 33712* | Lemma for ttrclse 33713. Show that a suc 𝑁 element long chain gives membership in the 𝑁-th predecessor class and vice-versa. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑁) = 𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑁(𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | ttrclse 33713 |
If 𝑅 is set-like over 𝐴, then
the transitive closure of the
restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is set-like over 𝐴.
This theorem requires the axioms of infinity and replacement for its proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Se 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xpg 33714* | Special case of founded partial induction over a cross product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 × 𝐵), ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) → 𝜒) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑅 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | frpoins3xp3g 33715* | Special case of founded partial recursion over a triple cross product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (∀𝑤∀𝑡∀𝑢(⟨⟨𝑤, 𝑡⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∈ Pred(𝑅, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩) → 𝜃) → 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑡 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑅 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2lem 33716* | Lemma for cross product ordering. Calculate the value of the cross product relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩𝑇⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑐) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp2 33717* | Another way of partially ordering a cross product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp2 33718* | Another way of giving a founded order to a cross product of two classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2pred 33719* | Calculate the predecessor class in frxp2 33718. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → Pred(𝑇, (𝐴 × 𝐵), ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩) = (((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) ∖ {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp2 33720* | Condition for the relationship in frxp2 33718 to be set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord2ind 33721* | Induction over the cross product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3lem 33722* | Lemma for triple ordering. Calculate the value of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩𝑈⟨⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩, 𝑓⟩ ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (((𝑎𝑅𝑑 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑏𝑆𝑒 ∨ 𝑏 = 𝑒) ∧ (𝑐𝑇𝑓 ∨ 𝑐 = 𝑓)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑑 ∨ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑒 ∨ 𝑐 ≠ 𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp3 33723* | Triple cross product partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Po 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Po ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | frxp3 33724* | Give foundedness over a triple cross product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Fr 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Fr ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3pred 33725* | Calculate the predecsessor class for the triple order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → Pred(𝑈, ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶), ⟨⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩, 𝑍⟩) = ((((Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ {𝑋}) × (Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌) ∪ {𝑌})) × (Pred(𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑍) ∪ {𝑍})) ∖ {⟨⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩, 𝑍⟩})) | ||
| Theorem | sexp3 33726* | Show that the triple order is set-like. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Se 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 Se ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpord3ind 33727* | Induction over the triple cross product ordering. Note that the substitutions cover all possible cases of membership in the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ∧ ((((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑆(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦)) ∨ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑦))) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑇(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦))) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 & ⊢ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑆 Se 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝑇 Fr 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Po 𝐶 & ⊢ 𝑇 Se 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑎)𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ Pred (𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑏)𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ Pred (𝑇, 𝐶, 𝑐)𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | orderseqlem 33728* | Lemma for poseq 33729 and soseq 33730. The function value of a sequene is either in 𝐴 or null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {∅})) | ||
| Theorem | poseq 33729* | A partial ordering of sequences of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Po (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Po 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | soseq 33730* | A linear ordering of sequences of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or (𝐴 ∪ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝐴} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))} & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 Or 𝐹 | ||
| Syntax | cwsuc 33731 | Declare the syntax for well-founded successor. |
| class wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) | ||
| Syntax | cwlim 33732 | Declare the syntax for well-founded limit class. |
| class WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) | ||
| Definition | df-wsuc 33733 | Define the concept of a successor in a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = inf(Pred(◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
| Definition | df-wlim 33734* | Define the class of limit points of a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅))} | ||
| Theorem | wsuceq123 33735 | Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | wsuceq1 33736 | Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | wsuceq2 33737 | Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | wsuceq3 33738 | Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | nfwsuc 33739 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | wlimeq12 33740 | Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | wlimeq1 33741 | Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | wlimeq2 33742 | Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑅, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfwlim 33743 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elwlim 33744 | Membership in the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | wzel 33745 | The zero of a well-founded set is a member of that set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | wsuclem 33746* | Lemma for the supremum properties of well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑤) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)𝑧𝑅𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | wsucex 33747 | Existence theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | wsuccl 33748* | If 𝑋 is a set with an 𝑅 successor in 𝐴, then its well-founded successor is a member of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | wsuclb 33749 | A well-founded successor is a lower bound on points after 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌𝑅wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | wlimss 33750 | The class of limit points is a subclass of the base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | cnadd 33751 | Declare the syntax for natural ordinal addition. See df-nadd 33752. |
| class +no | ||
| Definition | df-nadd 33752* | Define natural ordinal addition. This is a commutative form of addition over the ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ +no = frecs({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥) E (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥) E (2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}, (On × On), (𝑧 ∈ V, 𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ On ∣ ((𝑎 “ ({(1st ‘𝑧)} × (2nd ‘𝑧))) ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ (𝑎 “ ((1st ‘𝑧) × {(2nd ‘𝑧)})) ⊆ 𝑤)})) | ||
| Theorem | on2recsfn 33753* | Show that double recursion over ordinals yields a function over pairs of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥) E (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥) E (2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}, (On × On), 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (On × On) | ||
| Theorem | on2recsov 33754* | Calculate the value of the double ordinal recursion operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥) E (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥) E (2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}, (On × On), 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐺(𝐹 ↾ ((suc 𝐴 × suc 𝐵) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})))) | ||
| Theorem | on2ind 33755* | Double induction over ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑐 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ 𝑏 ∈ On) → ((∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑏 𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑏 𝜃) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ∈ On) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | on3ind 33756* | Triple induction over ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆)) & ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ 𝑏 ∈ On ∧ 𝑐 ∈ On) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑐 𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑐 𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑐 𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑐 𝜂) → 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ∈ On ∧ 𝑍 ∈ On) → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | naddfn 33757 | Natural addition is a function over pairs of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ +no Fn (On × On) | ||
| Theorem | naddcllem 33758* | Lemma for ordinal addition closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 +no 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 +no 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (( +no “ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ( +no “ (𝐴 × {𝐵})) ⊆ 𝑥)})) | ||
| Theorem | naddcl 33759 | Closure law for natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +no 𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | naddov 33760* | The value of natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +no 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (( +no “ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ( +no “ (𝐴 × {𝐵})) ⊆ 𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | naddov2 33761* | Alternate expression for natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +no 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +no 𝑦) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 +no 𝐵) ∈ 𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | naddcom 33762 | Natural addition commutes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +no 𝐵) = (𝐵 +no 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | naddid1 33763 | Ordinal zero is the additive identity for natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +no ∅) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | naddssim 33764 | Ordinal less-than-or-equal is preserved by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +no 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 +no 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | naddelim 33765 | Ordinal less-than is preserved by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +no 𝐶) ∈ (𝐵 +no 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | naddel1 33766 | Ordinal less-than is not affected by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +no 𝐶) ∈ (𝐵 +no 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | naddel2 33767 | Ordinal less-than is not affected by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +no 𝐴) ∈ (𝐶 +no 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | naddss1 33768 | Ordinal less-than-or-equal is not affected by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +no 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 +no 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | naddss2 33769 | Ordinal less-than-or-equal is not affected by natural addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +no 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 +no 𝐵))) | ||
| Syntax | csur 33770 | Declare the class of all surreal numbers (see df-no 33773). |
| class No | ||
| Syntax | cslt 33771 | Declare the less than relationship over surreal numbers (see df-slt 33774). |
| class <s | ||
| Syntax | cbday 33772 | Declare the birthday function for surreal numbers (see df-bday 33775). |
| class bday | ||
| Definition | df-no 33773* |
Define the class of surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are a proper
class of numbers developed by John H. Conway and introduced by Donald
Knuth in 1975. They form a proper class into which all ordered fields
can be embedded. The approach we take to defining them was first
introduced by Hary Gonshor, and is based on the conception of a
"sign
expansion" of a surreal number. We define the surreals as
ordinal-indexed sequences of 1o and
2o, analagous to Gonshor's
( − ) and ( + ).
After introducing this definition, we will abstract away from it using axioms that Norman Alling developed in "Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields." This is done in an effort to be agnostic towards the exact implementation of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ No = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑎⟶{1o, 2o}} | ||
| Definition | df-slt 33774* | Next, we introduce surreal less-than, a comparison relationship over the surreals by lexicographically ordering them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ <s = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ No ∧ 𝑔 ∈ No ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝑔‘𝑥)))} | ||
| Definition | df-bday 33775 | Finally, we introduce the birthday function. This function maps each surreal to an ordinal. In our implementation, this is the domain of the sign function. The important properties of this function are established later. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ bday = (𝑥 ∈ No ↦ dom 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | elno 33776* | Membership in the surreals. (Shortened proof on 2012-Apr-14, SF). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o}) | ||
| Theorem | sltval 33777* | The value of the surreal less than relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴‘𝑦) = (𝐵‘𝑦) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | bdayval 33778 | The value of the birthday function within the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘𝐴) = dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nofun 33779 | A surreal is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Fun 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nodmon 33780 | The domain of a surreal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → dom 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | norn 33781 | The range of a surreal is a subset of the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o}) | ||
| Theorem | nofnbday 33782 | A surreal is a function over its birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 Fn ( bday ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nodmord 33783 | The domain of a surreal has the ordinal property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Ord dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elno2 33784 | An alternative condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o})) | ||
| Theorem | elno3 33785 | Another condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶{1o, 2o} ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On)) | ||
| Theorem | sltval2 33786* | Alternate expression for surreal less than. Two surreals obey surreal less than iff they obey the sign ordering at the first place they differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}))) | ||
| Theorem | nofv 33787 | The function value of a surreal is either a sign or the empty set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ((𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o)) | ||
| Theorem | nosgnn0 33788 | ∅ is not a surreal sign. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {1o, 2o} | ||
| Theorem | nosgnn0i 33789 | If 𝑋 is a surreal sign, then it is not null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o} ⇒ ⊢ ∅ ≠ 𝑋 | ||
| Theorem | noreson 33790 | The restriction of a surreal to an ordinal is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ No ) | ||
| Theorem | sltintdifex 33791* | If 𝐴 <s 𝐵, then the intersection of all the ordinals that have differing signs in 𝐴 and 𝐵 exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | sltres 33792 | If the restrictions of two surreals to a given ordinal obey surreal less than, then so do the two surreals themselves. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) <s (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | noxp1o 33793 | The Cartesian product of an ordinal and {1o} is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {1o}) ∈ No ) | ||
| Theorem | noseponlem 33794* | Lemma for nosepon 33795. Consider a case of proper subset domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | nosepon 33795* | Given two unequal surreals, the minimal ordinal at which they differ is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | noextend 33796 | Extending a surreal by one sign value results in a new surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩}) ∈ No ) | ||
| Theorem | noextendseq 33797 | Extend a surreal by a sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ dom 𝐴) × {𝑋})) ∈ No ) | ||
| Theorem | noextenddif 33798* | Calculate the place where a surreal and its extension differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩})‘𝑥)} = dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | noextendlt 33799 | Extending a surreal with a negative sign results in a smaller surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 1o⟩}) <s 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | noextendgt 33800 | Extending a surreal with a positive sign results in a bigger surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 <s (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 2o⟩})) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |