P. 338 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33701-33800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	refssfne 33701*	A cover is a refinement iff it is a subcover of something which is both finer and a refinement. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 18-Jan-2010.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ∪ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝐵Ref𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑐(𝐵 ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ (𝐴Fne𝑐 ∧ 𝑐Ref𝐴))))
20.10.5  Neighborhood bases determine topologies
Theorem	neibastop1 33702*	A collection of neighborhood bases determines a topology. Part of Theorem 4.5 of Stephen Willard's General Topology. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶(𝒫 𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑤)) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑜) ≠ ∅}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))
Theorem	neibastop2lem 33703*	Lemma for neibastop2 33704. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶(𝒫 𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑤)) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑜) ≠ ∅}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 ((𝐹‘𝑦) ∩ 𝒫 𝑣) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (rec((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑧)), {𝑈}) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐺((𝐹‘𝑦) ∩ 𝒫 𝑓) ≠ ∅}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑁))
Theorem	neibastop2 33704*	In the topology generated by a neighborhood base, a set is a neighborhood of a point iff it contains a subset in the base. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 9-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶(𝒫 𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑤)) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑜) ≠ ∅}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 ((𝐹‘𝑦) ∩ 𝒫 𝑣) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑃}) ↔ (𝑁 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∩ 𝒫 𝑁) ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	neibastop3 33705*	The topology generated by a neighborhood base is unique. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 16-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶(𝒫 𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 (𝑣 ∩ 𝑤)) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑜 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑜 ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑜) ≠ ∅}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 ((𝐹‘𝑦) ∩ 𝒫 𝑣) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑗 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∩ 𝒫 𝑛) ≠ ∅})
20.10.6  Lattice structure of topologies
Theorem	topmtcl 33706	The meet of a collection of topologies on 𝑋 is again a topology on 𝑋. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (TopOn‘𝑋)) → (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑆) ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))
Theorem	topmeet 33707*	Two equivalent formulations of the meet of a collection of topologies. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (TopOn‘𝑋)) → (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑆) = ∪ {𝑘 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋) ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 𝑘 ⊆ 𝑗})
Theorem	topjoin 33708*	Two equivalent formulations of the join of a collection of topologies. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (TopOn‘𝑋)) → (topGen‘(fi‘({𝑋} ∪ ∪ 𝑆))) = ∩ {𝑘 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋) ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ⊆ 𝑘})
Theorem	fnemeet1 33709*	The meet of a collection of equivalence classes of covers with respect to fineness. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 (topGen‘𝑡))Fne𝐴)
Theorem	fnemeet2 33710*	The meet of equivalence classes under the fineness relation-part two. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 6-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦) → (𝑇Fne(𝒫 𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 (topGen‘𝑡)) ↔ (𝑋 = ∪ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑇Fne𝑥)))
Theorem	fnejoin1 33711*	Join of equivalence classes under the fineness relation-part one. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐴Fneif(𝑆 = ∅, {𝑋}, ∪ 𝑆))
Theorem	fnejoin2 33712*	Join of equivalence classes under the fineness relation-part two. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦) → (if(𝑆 = ∅, {𝑋}, ∪ 𝑆)Fne𝑇 ↔ (𝑋 = ∪ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥Fne𝑇)))
20.10.7  Filter bases
Theorem	fgmin 33713	Minimality property of a generated filter: every filter that contains 𝐵 contains its generated filter. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (fBas‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐹 ↔ (𝑋filGen𝐵) ⊆ 𝐹))
Theorem	neifg 33714*	The neighborhood filter of a nonempty set is generated by its open supersets. See comments for opnfbas 22444. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 3-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋filGen{𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥}) = ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆))
20.10.8  Directed sets, nets
Theorem	tailfval 33715*	The tail function for a directed set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ DirRel → (tail‘𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝐷 “ {𝑥})))
Theorem	tailval 33716	The tail of an element in a directed set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → ((tail‘𝐷)‘𝐴) = (𝐷 “ {𝐴}))
Theorem	eltail 33717	An element of a tail. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ ((tail‘𝐷)‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴𝐷𝐵))
Theorem	tailf 33718	The tail function of a directed set sends its elements to its subsets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ DirRel → (tail‘𝐷):𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	tailini 33719	A tail contains its initial element. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ ((tail‘𝐷)‘𝐴))
Theorem	tailfb 33720	The collection of tails of a directed set is a filter base. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → ran (tail‘𝐷) ∈ (fBas‘𝑋))
Theorem	filnetlem1 33721*	Lemma for filnet 33725. Change variables. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐹 ({𝑛} × 𝑛)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (1st ‘𝑦) ⊆ (1st ‘𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐷𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) ⊆ (1st ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	filnetlem2 33722*	Lemma for filnet 33725. The field of the direction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐹 ({𝑛} × 𝑛)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (1st ‘𝑦) ⊆ (1st ‘𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐻) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐻 × 𝐻))
Theorem	filnetlem3 33723*	Lemma for filnet 33725. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐹 ({𝑛} × 𝑛)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (1st ‘𝑦) ⊆ (1st ‘𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 = ∪ ∪ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) → (𝐻 ⊆ (𝐹 × 𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ DirRel)))
Theorem	filnetlem4 33724*	Lemma for filnet 33725. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐹 ({𝑛} × 𝑛)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (1st ‘𝑦) ⊆ (1st ‘𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) → ∃𝑑 ∈ DirRel ∃𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑑⟶𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 = ((𝑋 FilMap 𝑓)‘ran (tail‘𝑑))))
Theorem	filnet 33725*	A filter has the same convergence and clustering properties as some net. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Dec-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) → ∃𝑑 ∈ DirRel ∃𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑑⟶𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 = ((𝑋 FilMap 𝑓)‘ran (tail‘𝑑))))
20.11  Mathbox for Anthony Hart
20.11.1  Propositional Calculus
Theorem	tb-ax1 33726	The first of three axioms in the Tarski-Bernays axiom system. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	tb-ax2 33727	The second of three axioms in the Tarski-Bernays axiom system. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	tb-ax3 33728	The third of three axioms in the Tarski-Bernays axiom system. This axiom, along with ax-mp 5, tb-ax1 33726, and tb-ax2 33727, can be used to derive any theorem or rule that uses only →. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	tbsyl 33729	The weak syllogism from Tarski-Bernays'. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	re1ax2lem 33730	Lemma for re1ax2 33731. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	re1ax2 33731	ax-2 7 rederived from the Tarski-Bernays axiom system. Often tb-ax1 33726 is replaced with this theorem to make a "standard" system. This is because this theorem is easier to work with, despite it being longer. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	naim1 33732	Constructor theorem for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 1-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)))
Theorem	naim2 33733	Constructor theorem for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 1-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)))
Theorem	naim1i 33734	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	naim2i 33735	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)
Theorem	naim12i 33736	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	nabi1i 33737	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	nabi2i 33738	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)
Theorem	nabi12i 33739	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Syntax	w3nand 33740	The double nand.
wff (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)
Definition	df-3nand 33741	The double nand. This definition allows us to express the input of three variables only being false if all three are true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3nandALT1 33742	The double nand expressed in terms of pure nand. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ⊼ ((𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒))))
Theorem	df3nandALT2 33743	The double nand expressed in terms of negation and and not. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	andnand1 33744	Double and in terms of double nand. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)))
Theorem	imnand2 33745	An → nand relation. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜑) ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜓)))
20.11.2  Predicate Calculus
Theorem	nalfal 33746	Not all sets hold ⊥ as true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥⊥
Theorem	nexntru 33747	There does not exist a set such that ⊤ is not true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ ⊤
Theorem	nexfal 33748	There does not exist a set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥⊥
Theorem	neufal 33749	There does not exist exactly one set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃!𝑥⊥
Theorem	neutru 33750	There does not exist exactly one set such that ⊤ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃!𝑥⊤
Theorem	nmotru 33751	There does not exist at most one set such that ⊤ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃*𝑥⊤
Theorem	mofal 33752	There exist at most one set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥⊥
Theorem	nrmo 33753	"At most one" restricted existential quantifier for a statement which is never true. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
20.11.3  Miscellaneous single axioms
Theorem	meran1 33754	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜑))))
Theorem	meran2 33755	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃))))
Theorem	meran3 33756	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜑))))
Theorem	waj-ax 33757	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Mordchaj Wajsberg (Logical Works, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1977). See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom W on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ (((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))))
Theorem	lukshef-ax2 33758	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Jan Lukasiewicz. See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom L2 on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 14-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜓) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
Theorem	arg-ax 33759	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Ken Harris and Branden Fitelson. See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom HF1 on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 14-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜒 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
20.11.4  Connective Symmetry
Theorem	negsym1 33760	In the paper "On Variable Functors of Propositional Arguments", Lukasiewicz introduced a system that can handle variable connectives. This was done by introducing a variable, marked with a lowercase delta, which takes a wff as input. In the system, "delta 𝜑 " means that "something is true of 𝜑". The expression "delta 𝜑 " can be substituted with ¬ 𝜑, 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑, ∀𝑥𝜑, etc. Later on, Meredith discovered a single axiom, in the form of ( delta delta ⊥ → delta 𝜑 ). This represents the shortest theorem in the extended propositional calculus that cannot be derived as an instance of a theorem in propositional calculus. A symmetry with ¬. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ⊥ → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	imsym1 33761	A symmetry with →. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜓 → ⊥)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	bisym1 33762	A symmetry with ↔. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	consym1 33763	A symmetry with ∧. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	dissym1 33764	A symmetry with ∨. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	nandsym1 33765	A symmetry with ⊼. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜑))
Theorem	unisym1 33766	A symmetry with ∀. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥⊥ → ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	exisym1 33767	A symmetry with ∃. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑥⊥ → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	unqsym1 33768	A symmetry with ∃!. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 6-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥∃!𝑥⊥ → ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	amosym1 33769	A symmetry with ∃*. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥∃*𝑥⊥ → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	subsym1 33770	A symmetry with [𝑥 / 𝑦]. See negsym1 33760 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 11-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑦 / 𝑥]⊥ → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
20.12  Mathbox for Chen-Pang He
20.12.1  Ordinal topology
Theorem	ontopbas 33771	An ordinal number is a topological basis. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝐵 ∈ TopBases)
Theorem	onsstopbas 33772	The class of ordinal numbers is a subclass of the class of topological bases. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Oct-2015.)
⊢ On ⊆ TopBases
Theorem	onpsstopbas 33773	The class of ordinal numbers is a proper subclass of the class of topological bases. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 9-Oct-2015.)
⊢ On ⊊ TopBases
Theorem	ontgval 33774	The topology generated from an ordinal number 𝐵 is suc ∪ 𝐵. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (topGen‘𝐵) = suc ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	ontgsucval 33775	The topology generated from a successor ordinal number is itself. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 11-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (topGen‘suc 𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	onsuctop 33776	A successor ordinal number is a topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 11-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Top)
Theorem	onsuctopon 33777	One of the topologies on an ordinal number is its successor. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 7-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴))
Theorem	ordtoplem 33778	Membership of the class of successor ordinals. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ On → suc ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≠ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	ordtop 33779	An ordinal is a topology iff it is not its supremum (union), proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ≠ ∪ 𝐽))
Theorem	onsucconni 33780	A successor ordinal number is a connected topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ suc 𝐴 ∈ Conn
Theorem	onsucconn 33781	A successor ordinal number is a connected topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Conn)
Theorem	ordtopconn 33782	An ordinal topology is connected. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ∈ Conn))
Theorem	onintopssconn 33783	An ordinal topology is connected, expressed in constants. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Top) ⊆ Conn
Theorem	onsuct0 33784	A successor ordinal number is a T0 space. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Kol2)
Theorem	ordtopt0 33785	An ordinal topology is T0. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ∈ Kol2))
Theorem	onsucsuccmpi 33786	The successor of a successor ordinal number is a compact topology, proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 18-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ suc suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp
Theorem	onsucsuccmp 33787	The successor of a successor ordinal number is a compact topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 18-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp)
Theorem	limsucncmpi 33788	The successor of a limit ordinal is not compact. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 20-Oct-2015.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp
Theorem	limsucncmp 33789	The successor of a limit ordinal is not compact. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 20-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp)
Theorem	ordcmp 33790	An ordinal topology is compact iff the underlying set is its supremum (union) only when the ordinal is 1o. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ Comp ↔ (∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 1o)))
Theorem	ssoninhaus 33791	The ordinal topologies 1o and 2o are Hausdorff. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Nov-2015.)
⊢ {1o, 2o} ⊆ (On ∩ Haus)
Theorem	onint1 33792	The ordinal T1 spaces are 1o and 2o, proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 9-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fre) = {1o, 2o}
Theorem	oninhaus 33793	The ordinal Hausdorff spaces are 1o and 2o. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Haus) = {1o, 2o}
20.13  Mathbox for Jeff Hoffman
20.13.1  Inferences for finite induction on generic function values
Theorem	fveleq 33794	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 12-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)))
Theorem	findfvcl 33795*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 12-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	findreccl 33796*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 19-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 → (rec(𝐺, 𝐴)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	findabrcl 33797*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 16-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec(𝐺, 𝐴)‘𝑥))‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
20.13.2  gdc.mm
Theorem	nnssi2 33798	Convert a theorem for real/complex numbers into one for positive integers. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ 𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜓)
Theorem	nnssi3 33799	Convert a theorem for real/complex numbers into one for positive integers. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ 𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜓)
Theorem	nndivsub 33800	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ ↔ ((𝐵 − 𝐴) / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ))