| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 338 of 509) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31407) |
(31408-32930) |
(32931-50831) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cerl 33701 | Syntax for ring localization equivalence class operation. |
| class ~RL | ||
| Syntax | crloc 33702 | Syntax for ring localization operation. |
| class RLocal | ||
| Definition | df-erl 33703* | Define the operation giving the equivalence relation used in the localization of a ring 𝑟 by a set 𝑠. Two pairs 𝑎 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 and 𝑏 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 are equivalent if there exists 𝑡 ∈ 𝑠 such that 𝑡 · (𝑥 · 𝑤 − 𝑧 · 𝑦) = 0. This corresponds to the usual comparison of fractions 𝑥 / 𝑦 and 𝑧 / 𝑤. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ ~RL = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌⦋((Base‘𝑟) × 𝑠) / 𝑤⦌{〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑡𝑥(((1st ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))(-g‘𝑟)((1st ‘𝑏)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑎)))) = (0g‘𝑟))}) | ||
| Definition | df-rloc 33704* | Define the operation giving the localization of a ring 𝑟 by a given set 𝑠. The localized ring 𝑟 RLocal 𝑠 is the set of equivalence classes of pairs of elements in 𝑟 over the relation 𝑟 ~RL 𝑠 with addition and multiplication defined naturally. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ RLocal = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌⦋((Base‘𝑟) × 𝑠) / 𝑤⦌((({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑤〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (𝑎 ∈ 𝑤, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑤 ↦ 〈(((1st ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))(+g‘𝑟)((1st ‘𝑏)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑎))), ((2nd ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))〉)〉, 〈(.r‘ndx), (𝑎 ∈ 𝑤, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑤 ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑎)𝑥(1st ‘𝑏)), ((2nd ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))〉)〉} ∪ {〈(Scalar‘ndx), (Scalar‘𝑟)〉, 〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑘 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑟)), 𝑎 ∈ 𝑤 ↦ 〈(𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑟)(1st ‘𝑎)), (2nd ‘𝑎)〉)〉, 〈(·𝑖‘ndx), ∅〉}) ∪ {〈(TopSet‘ndx), ((TopSet‘𝑟) ×t ((TopSet‘𝑟) ↾t 𝑠))〉, 〈(le‘ndx), {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))(le‘𝑟)((1st ‘𝑏)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑎)))}〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), (𝑎 ∈ 𝑤, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑤 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑎)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑏))(dist‘𝑟)((1st ‘𝑏)𝑥(2nd ‘𝑎))))〉}) /s (𝑟 ~RL 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | reldmrloc 33705 | Ring localization is a proper operator, so it can be used with ovprc1 7456. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom RLocal | ||
| Theorem | erlval 33706* | Value of the ring localization equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐵 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 · (((1st ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏)) − ((1st ‘𝑏) · (2nd ‘𝑎)))) = 0 )} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) = ∼ ) | ||
| Theorem | rlocval 33707* | Expand the value of the ring localization operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐵 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopSet‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑅) & ⊢ ⊕ = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑊, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 〈(((1st ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏)) + ((1st ‘𝑏) · (2nd ‘𝑎))), ((2nd ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏))〉) & ⊢ ⊗ = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑊, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑎) · (1st ‘𝑏)), ((2nd ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏))〉) & ⊢ × = (𝑘 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑎 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 〈(𝑘𝐶(1st ‘𝑎)), (2nd ‘𝑎)〉) & ⊢ ≲ = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏)) ≤ ((1st ‘𝑏) · (2nd ‘𝑎)))} & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑊, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (((1st ‘𝑎) · (2nd ‘𝑏))𝐷((1st ‘𝑏) · (2nd ‘𝑎)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) = ((({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑊〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), ⊕ 〉, 〈(.r‘ndx), ⊗ 〉} ∪ {〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝐹〉, 〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), × 〉, 〈(·𝑖‘ndx), ∅〉}) ∪ {〈(TopSet‘ndx), (𝐽 ×t (𝐽 ↾t 𝑆))〉, 〈(le‘ndx), ≲ 〉, 〈(dist‘ndx), 𝐸〉}) /s ∼ )) | ||
| Theorem | erlcl1 33708 | Closure for the ring localization equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∼ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | erlcl2 33709 | Closure for the ring localization equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∼ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | erldi 33710* | Main property of the ring localization equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∼ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 · (((1st ‘𝑈) · (2nd ‘𝑉)) − ((1st ‘𝑉) · (2nd ‘𝑈)))) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | erlbrd 33711 | Deduce the ring localization equivalence relation. If for some 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆 we have 𝑇 · (𝐸 · 𝐻 − 𝐹 · 𝐺) = 0, then pairs 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉 and 〈𝐹, 𝐻〉 are equivalent under the localization relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = 〈𝐹, 𝐻〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 · ((𝐸 · 𝐻) − (𝐹 · 𝐺))) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∼ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | erlbr2d 33712 | Deduce the ring localization equivalence relation. Pairs 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉 and 〈𝑇 · 𝐸, 𝑇 · 𝐺〉 for 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆 are equivalent under the localization relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = 〈𝐹, 𝐻〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑇 · 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑇 · 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∼ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | erler 33713 | The relation used to build the ring localization is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐵 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | erld2 33714* | Main property of the ring localization equivalence relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → [〈𝑋, 𝑌〉] ∼ = [〈𝑍, 𝑊〉] ∼ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 · (𝑋 · 𝑊)) = (𝑡 · (𝑍 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | elrlocbasi 33715* | Membership in the basis of a ring localization. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ((𝐵 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 = [〈𝑎, 𝑏〉] ∼ ) | ||
| Theorem | rlocbas 33716 | The base set of a ring localization. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐵 × 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 / ∼ ) = (Base‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | rlocaddval 33717 | Value of the addition in the ring localization, given two representatives. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ⊕ = (+g‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([〈𝐸, 𝐺〉] ∼ ⊕ [〈𝐹, 𝐻〉] ∼ ) = [〈((𝐸 · 𝐻) + (𝐹 · 𝐺)), (𝐺 · 𝐻)〉] ∼ ) | ||
| Theorem | rlocmulval 33718 | Value of the addition in the ring localization, given two representatives. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ⊗ = (.r‘𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([〈𝐸, 𝐺〉] ∼ ⊗ [〈𝐹, 𝐻〉] ∼ ) = [〈(𝐸 · 𝐹), (𝐺 · 𝐻)〉] ∼ ) | ||
| Theorem | rloccring 33719 | The ring localization 𝐿 of a commutative ring 𝑅 by a multiplicatively closed set 𝑆 is itself a commutative ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ CRing) | ||
| Theorem | rloc0g 33720 | The zero of a ring localization. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ 𝑂 = [〈 0 , 1 〉] ∼ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | rloc1r 33721 | The multiplicative identity of a ring localization. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = [〈 1 , 1 〉] ∼ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (1r‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | rlocf1 33722* | The embedding 𝐹 of a ring 𝑅 into its localization 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ [〈𝑥, 1 〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (RLReg‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐵 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝐿))) | ||
| Theorem | rlocinvunit 33723 | In the localization of a ring 𝑅 at 𝑆, inverses of elements of 𝑆 are units. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (Unit‘𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → [〈 1 , 𝑄〉] ∼ ∈ 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | rlocisunit 33724* | Characterize the units of the localization 𝐿 of a ring 𝑅 at 𝑆 as the elements with a "numerator" 𝑃 in the saturation 𝑇 of 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 RLocal 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (Unit‘𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘(mulGrp‘𝑅))) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑟 · 𝑠) ∈ 𝑆} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([〈𝑃, 𝑄〉] ∼ ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | domnmuln0rd 33725 | In a domain, factors of a nonzero product are nonzero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | domnprodn0 33726 | In a domain, a finite product of nonzero terms is nonzero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word (𝐵 ∖ { 0 })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Σg 𝐹) ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | domnprodeq0 33727 | A product over a domain is zero exactly when one of the factors is zero. Generalization of domneq0 20876 for any number of factors. See also domnprodn0 33726. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 Σg 𝐹) = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | domnpropd 33728* | If two structures have the same components (properties), one is a domain iff the other one is. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Domn ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Domn)) | ||
| Theorem | idompropd 33729* | If two structures have the same components (properties), one is a integral domain iff the other one is. See also domnpropd 33728. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ IDomn ↔ 𝐿 ∈ IDomn)) | ||
| Theorem | idomrcan 33730 | Right-cancellation law for integral domains. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 21-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ { 0 })) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) = (𝑌 · 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | 1rrg 33731 | The multiplicative identity is a left-regular element. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | rrgsubm 33732 | The left regular elements of a ring form a submonoid of the multiplicative group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | subrdom 33733 | A subring of a domain is a domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ Domn) | ||
| Theorem | subridom 33734 | A subring of an integral domain is an integral domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ IDomn) | ||
| Theorem | subrfld 33735 | A subring of a field is an integral domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝑆) ∈ IDomn) | ||
| Theorem | ricnzr1 33736 | A ring isomorphism maps a nonzero ring to a nonzero ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ≃𝑟 𝑆 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) → 𝑆 ∈ NzRing) | ||
| Theorem | ricdomn1 33737 | A ring isomorphism maps a domain to a domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ≃𝑟 𝑆 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Domn) → 𝑆 ∈ Domn) | ||
| Theorem | ricdomn 33738 | A ring is a domain if and only if an isomorphic ring is a domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ≃𝑟 𝑆 → (𝑅 ∈ Domn ↔ 𝑆 ∈ Domn)) | ||
| Syntax | ceuf 33739 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean function index extractor. |
| class EuclF | ||
| Definition | df-euf 33740 | Define the Euclidean function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) Use its index-independent form eufid 33742 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ EuclF = Slot ;21 | ||
| Theorem | eufndx 33741 | Index value of the Euclidean function slot. Use ndxarg 17294. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (EuclF‘ndx) = ;21 | ||
| Theorem | eufid 33742 | Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-euf 33740. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ EuclF = Slot (EuclF‘ndx) | ||
| Syntax | cedom 33743 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean Domain. |
| class EDomn | ||
| Definition | df-edom 33744* | Define Euclidean Domains. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ EDomn = {𝑑 ∈ IDomn ∣ [(EuclF‘𝑑) / 𝑒][(Base‘𝑑) / 𝑣](Fun 𝑒 ∧ (𝑒 “ (𝑣 ∖ {(0g‘𝑑)})) ⊆ (0[,)+∞) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑏 ∈ (𝑣 ∖ {(0g‘𝑑)})∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑎 = ((𝑏(.r‘𝑑)𝑞)(+g‘𝑑)𝑟) ∧ (𝑟 = (0g‘𝑑) ∨ (𝑒‘𝑟) < (𝑒‘𝑏))))} | ||
| Theorem | rndrhmcl 33745 | The image of a division ring by a ring homomorphism is a division ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑁 ↾s ran 𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 RingHom 𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ≠ { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ DivRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | qfld 33746 | The field of rational numbers is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (ℂfld ↾s ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑄 ∈ Field | ||
| Theorem | subsdrg 33747 | A subring of a sub-division-ring is a sub-division-ring. See also subsubrg 20766. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑆) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | sdrgdvcl 33748 | A sub-division-ring is closed under the ring division operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sdrginvcl 33749 | A sub-division-ring is closed under the ring inverse operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → (𝐼‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | primefldchr 33750 | The characteristic of a prime field is the same as the characteristic of the main field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑅 ↾s ∩ (SubDRing‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → (chr‘𝑃) = (chr‘𝑅)) | ||
| Syntax | cfrac 33751 | Syntax for the field of fractions of a given integral domain. |
| class Frac | ||
| Definition | df-frac 33752 | Define the field of fractions of a given integral domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ Frac = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 RLocal (RLReg‘𝑟))) | ||
| Theorem | fracval 33753 | Value of the field of fractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ( Frac ‘𝑅) = (𝑅 RLocal (RLReg‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | fracbas 33754 | The base of the field of fractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ( Frac ‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 × 𝐸) / ∼ ) = (Base‘𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | fracerl 33755 | Rewrite the ring localization equivalence relation in the case of a field of fractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL (RLReg‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RLReg‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (RLReg‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∼ 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉 ↔ (𝐸 · 𝐻) = (𝐺 · 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | fracf1 33756* | The embedding of a commutative ring 𝑅 into its field of fractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~RL 𝐸) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ [〈𝑥, 1 〉] ∼ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐵 × 𝐸) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom ( Frac ‘𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | fracfld 33757 | The field of fractions of an integral domain is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( Frac ‘𝑅) ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | idomsubr 33758* | Every integral domain is isomorphic with a subring of some field. (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 10-May-2025.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ Field ∃𝑠 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑓)𝑅 ≃𝑟 (𝑓 ↾s 𝑠)) | ||
| Syntax | cfldgen 33759 | Syntax for a function generating sub-fields. |
| class fldGen | ||
| Definition | df-fldgen 33760* | Define a function generating the smallest sub-division-ring of a given ring containing a given set. If the base structure is a division ring, then this is also a division ring (see fldgensdrg 33763). If the base structure is a field, this is a subfield (see fldgenfld 33769 and fldsdrgfld 20970). In general this will be used in the context of fields, hence the name fldGen. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov and Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ fldGen = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝑓) ∣ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑎}) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenval 33761* | Value of the field generating function: (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆) is the smallest sub-division-ring of 𝐹 containing 𝑆. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆) = ∩ {𝑎 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑎}) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenssid 33762 | The field generated by a set of elements contains those elements. See lspssid 21175. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | fldgensdrg 33763 | A generated subfield is a sub-division-ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆) ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenssv 33764 | A generated subfield is a subset of the field's base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenss 33765 | Generated subfields preserve subset ordering. ( see lspss 21174 and spanss 31837) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑇) ⊆ (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenidfld 33766 | The subfield generated by a subfield is the subfield itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenssp 33767 | The field generated by a set of elements in a division ring is contained in any sub-division-ring which contains those elements. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubDRing‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenid 33768 | The subfield of a field 𝐹 generated by the whole base set of 𝐹 is 𝐹 itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 fldGen 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fldgenfld 33769 | A generated subfield is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Field) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾s (𝐹 fldGen 𝑆)) ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | primefldgen1 33770 | The prime field of a division ring is the subfield generated by the multiplicative identity element. In general, we should write "prime division ring", but since most later usages are in the case where the ambient ring is commutative, we keep the term "prime field". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ (SubDRing‘𝑅) = (𝑅 fldGen { 1 })) | ||
| Theorem | 1fldgenq 33771 | The field of rational numbers ℚ is generated by 1 in ℂfld, that is, ℚ is the prime field of ℂfld. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld fldGen {1}) = ℚ | ||
| Theorem | rhmdvd 33772 | A ring homomorphism preserves ratios. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑈 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑈)) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) / (𝐹‘𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘(𝐴 · 𝐶)) / (𝐹‘(𝐵 · 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | kerunit 33773 | If a unit element lies in the kernel of a ring homomorphism, then 0 = 1, i.e. the target ring is the zero ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆) ∧ (𝑈 ∩ (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })) ≠ ∅) → 1 = 0 ) | ||
| Syntax | cresv 33774 | Extend class notation with the scalar restriction operation. |
| class ↾v | ||
| Definition | df-resv 33775* | Define an operator to restrict the scalar field component of an extended structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ ↾v = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) ⊆ 𝑥, 𝑤, (𝑤 sSet 〈(Scalar‘ndx), ((Scalar‘𝑤) ↾s 𝑥)〉))) | ||
| Theorem | reldmresv 33776 | The scalar restriction is a proper operator, so it can be used with ovprc1 7456. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom ↾v | ||
| Theorem | resvval 33777 | Value of structure restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝑅 = if(𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴, 𝑊, (𝑊 sSet 〈(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)〉))) | ||
| Theorem | resvid2 33778 | General behavior of trivial restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝑅 = 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | resvval2 33779 | Value of nontrivial structure restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝑅 = (𝑊 sSet 〈(Scalar‘ndx), (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴)〉)) | ||
| Theorem | resvsca 33780 | Base set of a structure restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) = (Scalar‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | resvlem 33781 | Other elements of a scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | resvbas 33782 | Base is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resvplusg 33783 | +g is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resvvsca 33784 | ·𝑠 is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resvmulr 33785 | .r is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 31-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → · = (.r‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resv0g 33786 | 0g is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 0 = (0g‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resv1r 33787 | 1r is unaffected by scalar restriction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 1 = (1r‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | resvcmn 33788 | Scalar restriction preserves commutative monoids. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾v 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ∈ CMnd ↔ 𝐻 ∈ CMnd)) | ||
| Theorem | gzcrng 33789 | The gaussian integers form a commutative ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld ↾s ℤ[i]) ∈ CRing | ||
| Theorem | cnfldfld 33790 | The complex numbers form a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ ℂfld ∈ Field | ||
| Theorem | reofld 33791 | The real numbers form an ordered field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ oField | ||
| Theorem | nn0omnd 33792 | The nonnegative integers form an ordered monoid. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) ∈ oMnd | ||
| Theorem | gsumind 33793 | The group sum of an indicator function of the set 𝐴 gives the size of 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂfld Σg ((𝟭‘𝑂)‘𝐴)) = (♯‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | rearchi 33794 | The field of the real numbers is Archimedean. See also arch 12529. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ Archi | ||
| Theorem | nn0archi 33795 | The monoid of the nonnegative integers is Archimedean. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) ∈ Archi | ||
| Theorem | xrge0slmod 33796 | The extended nonnegative real numbers form a semiring left module. One could also have used subringAlg to get the same structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℝ*𝑠 ↾s (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺 ↾v (0[,)+∞)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑊 ∈ SLMod | ||
| Theorem | qusker 33797* | The kernel of a quotient map. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥](𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 /s (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑀) → (◡𝐹 “ { 0 }) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | eqgvscpbl 33798 | The left coset equivalence relation is compatible with the scalar multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 → (𝐾 · 𝑋) ∼ (𝐾 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | qusvscpbl 33799* | The quotient map distributes over the scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 /s (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ [𝑥](𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘𝑉) → (𝐹‘(𝐾 · 𝑈)) = (𝐹‘(𝐾 · 𝑉)))) | ||
| Theorem | qusvsval 33800 | Value of the scalar multiplication operation on the quotient structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ ∼ = (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 /s (𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∙ [𝑋](𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) = [(𝐾 · 𝑋)](𝑀 ~QG 𝐺)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |