P. 338 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 33701-33800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-bj-minfty 33701	Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π)
Theorem	bj-minftyccb 33702	The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-minftynrr 33703	The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	bj-pinftynminfty 33704	The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Syntax	crrbar 33705	Syntax for the set of extended real numbers.
class ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-rrbar 33706	Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 10415. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	cinfty 33707	Syntax for ∞.
class ∞
Definition	df-bj-infty 33708	Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Syntax	ccchat 33709	Syntax for ℂ̂.
class ℂ̂
Definition	df-bj-cchat 33710	Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	crrhat 33711	Syntax for ℝ̂.
class ℝ̂
Definition	df-bj-rrhat 33712	Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞})
Theorem	bj-rrhatsscchat 33713	The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂
20.14.6.4  Addition and opposite We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations.
Syntax	caddcc 33714	Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers.
class +ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-addc 33715	Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ (Diag‘ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, ⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))⟩, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥))))
Syntax	coppcc 33716	Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere).
class -ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-oppc 33717*	Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). For infinite extended complex numbers, the argument of +∞eiτ is the opposite of the argument temporary real. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ 1/2)))))
20.14.6.5  Order relation on the extended reals In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 10416 without the intermediate step of df-lt 10285.
Syntax	cltxr 33718	Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals.
class <R
Definition	df-bj-lt 33719*	Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ <R = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑦, 0R⟩ ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞})))
20.14.6.6  Argument, multiplication and inverse Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrieved to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 33723
Syntax	carg 33720	Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number.
class Arg
Definition	df-bj-arg 33721	Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses [0, 2π) but the present one simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))
Syntax	cmulc 33722	Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers.
class ·ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-mulc 33723	Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is 0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails (0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 33725). Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrieved to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ))))))
Syntax	cinvc 33724	Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers.
class -1ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-invc 33725*	Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 33723, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0)))
20.14.6.7  The canonical bijection from the finite ordinals
Syntax	ciomnn 33726	Syntax for the canonical bijection from _om onto NN0.
class iω↪ℕ
Definition	df-bj-iomnn 33727*	Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract one at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 33673 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 33737 for its value at +∞. TODO: define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) (and then ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ ℕ)) and prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0 and that this bijection is an ordered rig isomorphism. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ⟨[⟨{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) ∪ {⟨ω, +∞⟩})
Theorem	bj-imafv 33728	If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these function at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-funun 33729	Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn1 33730	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn2 33731	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	eldifsnneq 33732	An element of a difference with a singleton is not equal to the element of that singleton. Note that (¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐶} → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐶) need not hold if 𝐴 is a proper class. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐶}) → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐶)
Theorem	bj-fvsnun1 33733	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷))
Theorem	bj-fvsnun2 33734	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 6718. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn1 33735*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn2 33736*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺)
Theorem	bj-iomnnom 33737	The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞
20.14.7  Monoids See ccmn 18579 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 18579. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 18580 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency.
Theorem	bj-cmnssmnd 33738	Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-cmnssmndel 33739	Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 18594, which relies on iscmn 18586. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-ablssgrp 33740	Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp
Theorem	bj-ablssgrpel 33741	Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 18584. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	bj-ablsscmn 33742	Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-ablsscmnel 33743	Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 18585. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
Theorem	bj-modssabl 33744	(The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 19302; see also lmodgrp 19262 and lmodcmn 19303.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel
Theorem	bj-vecssmod 33745	Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod
Theorem	bj-vecssmodel 33746	Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 19501. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod)
20.14.7.1  Finite sums in monoids UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 16489 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand).
Syntax	cfinsum 33747	Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids".
class FinSum
Definition	df-bj-finsum 33748*	Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	bj-finsumval0 33749*	Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼)))))
20.14.8  Affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry.
20.14.8.1  Convex hull in real vector spaces A few basic definitions and theorems about convex hulls in real vector spaces. TODO: prove inclusion in the class of subcomplex vector spaces.
Syntax	crrvec 33750	Syntax for the class of real vector spaces.
class ℝ-Vec
Definition	df-bj-rrvec 33751	Definition of the class of real vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LVec ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}
Theorem	bj-rrvecssvec 33752	Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec
Theorem	bj-rrvecssvecel 33753	Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ LVec)
Theorem	bj-rrvecsscmn 33754	(The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-rrvecsscmnel 33755	(The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative monoids (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
20.14.8.2  Complex numbers (supplements) Some lemmas to ease algebraic manipulations.
Theorem	bj-subcom 33756	A consequence of commutativity of multiplication. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) − (𝐵 · 𝐴)) = 0)
Theorem	bj-lineqi 33757	Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴))
20.14.8.3  Barycentric coordinates Lemmas about barycentric coordinates. For the moment, this is limited to the one-dimensional case (complex line), where existence and uniqueness of barycentric coordinates are proved by bj-bary1 33760 (which computes them). It would be nice to prove the two-dimensional case (is it easier to use ad hoc computations, or Cramer formulas?), in order to do some planar geometry.
Theorem	bj-bary1lem 33758	A lemma for barycentric coordinates in one dimension. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐴) + (((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-bary1lem1 33759	Existence and uniqueness (and actual computation) of barycentric coordinates in dimension 1 (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) → 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	bj-bary1 33760	Barycentric coordinates in one dimension. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) ↔ (𝑆 = ((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)))))
20.15  Mathbox for Jim Kingdon
20.15.0.1  Circle constant
Theorem	taupilem3 33761	Lemma for tau-related theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	taupilemrplb 33762*	A set of positive reals has (in the reals) a lower bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ 𝐴)𝑥 ≤ 𝑦
Theorem	taupilem1 33763	Lemma for taupi 33765. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	taupilem2 33764	Lemma for taupi 33765. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π)
Theorem	taupi 33765	Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = (2 · π)
20.15.0.2  Number theory
Theorem	dfgcd3 33766*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁))))
20.16  Mathbox for ML
Theorem	csbdif 33767	Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbpredg 33768	Move class substitution in and out of the predecessor class of a relationship. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌Pred(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝑋) = Pred(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑋))
Theorem	csbwrecsg 33769	Move class substitution in and out of the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌wrecs(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝐹) = wrecs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	csbrecsg 33770	Move class substitution in and out of recs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌recs(𝐹) = recs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	csbrdgg 33771	Move class substitution in and out of the recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐼))
Theorem	csboprabg 33772*	Move class substitution in and out of class abstractions of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑})
Theorem	csbmpt22g 33773*	Move class substitution in and out of maps-to notation for operations. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
Theorem	mpnanrd 33774	Eliminate the right side of a negated conjunction in an implication. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)
Theorem	con1bii2 33775	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	con2bii2 33776	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	vtoclefex 33777*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑)
Theorem	rnmptsn 33778*	The range of a function mapping to singletons. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}
Theorem	f1omptsnlem 33779*	This is the core of the proof of f1omptsn 33780, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	f1omptsn 33780*	A function mapping to singletons is bijective onto a set of singletons. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	mptsnunlem 33781*	This is the core of the proof of mptsnun 33782, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	mptsnun 33782*	A class 𝐵 is equal to the union of the class of all singletons of elements of 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	dissneqlem 33783*	This is the core of the proof of dissneq 33784, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dissneq 33784*	Any topology that contains every single-point set is the discrete topology. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	exlimim 33785*	Closed form of exlimimd 33786. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimimd 33786*	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exellim 33787*	Closed form of exellimddv 33788. See also exlimim 33785 for a more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	exellimddv 33788*	Eliminate an antecedent when the antecedent is elementhood, deduction version. See exellim 33787 for the closed form, which requires the use of a universal quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	topdifinfindis 33789*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is the trivial topology when 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴})
Theorem	topdifinffinlem 33790*	This is the core of the proof of topdifinffin 33791, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definition, we need to split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinffin 33791*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinf 33792*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology if and only if 𝐴 is finite, in which case it is the trivial topology. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴}))
Theorem	topdifinfeq 33793*	Two different ways of defining the collection from Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. (Contributed by ML, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = 𝐴))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}
Theorem	icorempt2 33794*	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
Theorem	icoreresf 33795	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals map to subsets of reals. (Contributed by ML, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)):(ℝ × ℝ)⟶𝒫 ℝ
Theorem	icoreval 33796*	Value of the closed-below, open-above interval function on reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴[,)𝐵) = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)})
Theorem	icoreelrnab 33797*	Elementhood in the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)})
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem1 33798*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 33801. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑑)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem2 33799*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 33801. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ≤ 𝑏)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	icoreclin 33800*	The set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)