P. 113 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11201-11300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ax1rid 11201	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulrid 11259, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 11225. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 11202*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 11226. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axrrecex 11203*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rrecex 11227. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	axcnre 11204*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 11228. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-lttri 11205	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 11332. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttri 11229. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 11206	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 11333. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 11230. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 11207	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axltadd 11334. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 11231. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 11208	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axmulgt0 11335. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 11232. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-sup 11209*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version with ordering on extended reals is axsup 11336. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-sup 11233. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	wuncn 11210	A weak universe containing ω contains the complex number construction. This theorem is construction-dependent in the literal sense, but will also be satisfied by any other reasonable implementation of the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℂ ∈ 𝑈)
5.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 11211	The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant - see cnexALT 13028- but we provide this axiom because the justification theorem axcnex 11187 does not use ax-rep 5279 even though the redundancy proof does. Proofs should normally use cnex 11236 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 11212	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axresscn 11188. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 11213	1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1cn 11189. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-icn 11214	i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axicn 11190. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 11215	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddcl 11191. Proofs should normally use addcl 11237 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 11216	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 23 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddrcl 11192. Proofs should normally use readdcl 11238 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 11217	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcl 11193. Proofs should normally use mulcl 11239 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 11218	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulrcl 11194. Proofs should normally use remulcl 11240 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcom 11219	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulcom 11195. Proofs should normally use mulcom 11241 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 11220	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axaddass 11196. Proofs should normally use addass 11242 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 11221	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axmulass 11197. Proofs should normally use mulass 11243 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 11222	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axdistr 11198. Proofs should normally use adddi 11244 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 11223	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axi2m1 11199. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-1ne0 11224	1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1ne0 11200. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 0
Axiom	ax-1rid 11225	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem ax1rid 11201. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulrid 11259, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 11226*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrnegex 11202. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-rrecex 11227*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axrrecex 11203. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Axiom	ax-cnre 11228*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axcnre 11204. For naming consistency, use cnre 11258 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttri 11229	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttri 11205. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 11332. Normally new proofs would use xrlttri 13181. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 11230	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-lttrn 11206. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 11333. Normally new proofs would use lttr 11337. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 11231	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-ltadd 11207. Normally new proofs would use axltadd 11334. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 11232	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-mulgt0 11208. Normally new proofs would use axmulgt0 11335. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-sup 11233*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by Theorem axpre-sup 11209. Note: Normally new proofs would use axsup 11336. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 11234	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first-order or second-order statement (see https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 11237 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 11234 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by Theorem axaddf 11185. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 11235	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This axiom tells us that · is defined only on complex numbers which is analogous to the way that other operations are defined, for example see subf 11510 or eff 16117. However, while Metamath can handle this axiom, if we wish to work with weaker complex number axioms, we can avoid it by using the less specific mulcl 11239. Note that uses of ax-mulf 11235 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, as seen in mpomulf 11250. This axiom is justified by Theorem axmulf 11186. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
5.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
5.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 11236	Alias for ax-cnex 11211. See also cnexALT 13028. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 11237	Alias for ax-addcl 11215, for naming consistency with addcli 11267. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 11215 or axaddcl 11191. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 11238	Alias for ax-addrcl 11216, for naming consistency with readdcli 11276. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcl 11239	Alias for ax-mulcl 11217, for naming consistency with mulcli 11268. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	remulcl 11240	Alias for ax-mulrcl 11218, for naming consistency with remulcli 11277. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcom 11241	Alias for ax-mulcom 11219, for naming consistency with mulcomi 11269. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addass 11242	Alias for ax-addass 11220, for naming consistency with addassi 11271. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulass 11243	Alias for ax-mulass 11221, for naming consistency with mulassi 11272. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddi 11244	Alias for ax-distr 11222, for naming consistency with adddii 11273. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	recn 11245	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	reex 11246	The real numbers form a set. See also reexALT 13026. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ V
Theorem	reelprrecn 11247	Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ℝ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}
Theorem	cnelprrecn 11248	Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers . (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}
Theorem	mpoaddf 11249*	Addition is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-addf 11234 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-addcl 11215. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)):(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	mpomulf 11250*	Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 11235 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 11217. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)):(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	elimne0 11251	Hypothesis for weak deduction theorem to eliminate 𝐴 ≠ 0. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ if(𝐴 ≠ 0, 𝐴, 1) ≠ 0
Theorem	adddir 11252	Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	0cn 11253	Zero is a complex number. See also 0cnALT 11496. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	0cnd 11254	Zero is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	c0ex 11255	Zero is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 0 ∈ V
Theorem	1cnd 11256	One is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	1ex 11257	One is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 1 ∈ V
Theorem	cnre 11258*	Alias for ax-cnre 11228, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	mulrid 11259	The number 1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mullid 11260	Identity law for multiplication. See mulrid 11259 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1re 11261	The number 1 is real. This used to be one of our postulates for complex numbers, but Eric Schmidt discovered that it could be derived from a weaker postulate, ax-1cn 11213, by exploiting properties of the imaginary unit i. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	1red 11262	The number 1 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	0re 11263	The number 0 is real. Remark: the first step could also be ax-icn 11214. See also 0reALT 11606. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 11-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ
Theorem	0red 11264	The number 0 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulridi 11265	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴
Theorem	mullidi 11266	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	addcli 11267	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
Theorem	mulcli 11268	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
Theorem	mulcomi 11269	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)
Theorem	mulcomli 11270	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	addassi 11271	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	mulassi 11272	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	adddii 11273	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))
Theorem	adddiri 11274	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))
Theorem	recni 11275	A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	readdcli 11276	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	remulcli 11277	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	mulridd 11278	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mullidd 11279	Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcld 11280	Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	mulcld 11281	Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	mulcomd 11282	Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addassd 11283	Associative law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulassd 11284	Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddid 11285	Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddird 11286	Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	adddirp1d 11287	Distributive law, plus 1 version. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 1) · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 𝐵))
Theorem	joinlmuladdmuld 11288	Join AB+CB into (A+C) on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐶 · 𝐵)) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) · 𝐵) = 𝐷)
Theorem	recnd 11289	Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcld 11290	Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	remulcld 11291	Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
5.2.2  Infinity and the extended real number system
Syntax	cpnf 11292	Plus infinity.
class +∞
Syntax	cmnf 11293	Minus infinity.
class -∞
Syntax	cxr 11294	The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity).
class ℝ*
Syntax	clt 11295	'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals).
class <
Syntax	cle 11296	Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation.
class ≤
Definition	df-pnf 11297	Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that +∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from -∞ (df-mnf 11298). We use 𝒫 ∪ ℂ to make it independent of the construction of ℂ, and Cantor's Theorem will show that it is different from any member of ℂ and therefore ℝ. See pnfnre 11302, mnfnre 11304, and pnfnemnf 11316. A simpler possibility is to define +∞ as ℂ and -∞ as {ℂ}, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +∞ and -∞ are different from each other and from all members of ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Definition	df-mnf 11298	Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from +∞ (see mnfnre 11304 and pnfnemnf 11316). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ -∞ = 𝒫 +∞
Definition	df-xr 11299	Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪ {+∞, -∞})
Definition	df-ltxr 11300*	Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <ℝ is primitive and not necessarily a relation on ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ < = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞}) × {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ)))