P. 389 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38801-38900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hlexch3 38801	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32178 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlexch4N 38802	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb1 38803	A version of hlexchb1 38794 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb2 38804	A version of hlexchb2 38795 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatexch1 38805	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatexch2 38806	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatmstcOLDN 38807*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32159 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	hlatle 38808*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32168 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlateq 38809*	The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 32170 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat1 38810*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32160, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlrelat5N 38811*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat 38812*	A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 32161 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat2 38813*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 32162 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	exatleN 38814	A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃))
Theorem	hl2at 38815*	A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞)
Theorem	atex 38816	At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	intnatN 38817	If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2llnne2N 38818	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	2llnneN 38819	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cvr1 38820	A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32152 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvr2N 38821	Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 32153 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlrelat3 38822*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 38812. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrval3 38823*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval4N 38824*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval5 38825*	Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrp 38826	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32172 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atcvr1 38827	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atcvr2 38828	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvrexchlem 38829	Lemma for cvrexch 38830. (cvexchlem 32165 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrexch 38830	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 32166 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvratlem 38831	Lemma for cvrat 38832. (atcvatlem 32182 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat 38832	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 32183 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltltncvr 38833	A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	ltcvrntr 38834	Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	cvrntr 38835	The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 32089 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	atcvr0eq 38836	The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 32176 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	lnnat 38837	A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcvrj0 38838	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 32177 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	cvrat2 38839	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 32184 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	atcvrneN 38840	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atcvrj1 38841	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atcvrj2b 38842	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atcvrj2 38843	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atleneN 38844	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atltcvr 38845	An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atle 38846*	Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlt 38847	Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atlelt 38848	Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋)
Theorem	2atlt 38849*	Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋))
Theorem	atexchcvrN 38850	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 38806 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atexchltN 38851	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 38806 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvrat3 38852	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 32193 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat4 38853*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 32194 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	cvrat42 38854*	Commuted version of cvrat4 38853. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	2atjm 38855	The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃)
Theorem	atbtwn 38856	Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	atbtwnexOLDN 38857*	There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atbtwnex 38858*	Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3noncolr2 38859	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3noncolr1N 38860	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatcon3 38861	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	hlatcon2 38862	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	4noncolr3 38863	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	4noncolr2 38864	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	4noncolr1 38865	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	athgt 38866*	A Hilbert lattice, whose height is at least 4, has a chain of 4 successively covering atom joins. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝𝐶(𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)𝐶(((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∨ 𝑠))))
Theorem	3dim0 38867*	There exists a 3-dimensional (height-4) element i.e. a volume. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dimlem1 38868	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	3dimlem2 38869	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	3dimlem3a 38870	Lemma for 3dim3 38879. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	3dimlem3 38871	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem3OLDN 38872	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem4a 38873	Lemma for 3dim3 38879. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	3dimlem4 38874	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem4OLDN 38875	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dim1lem5 38876*	Lemma for 3dim1 38877. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∨ 𝑣))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim1 38877*	Construct a 3-dimensional volume (height-4 element) on top of a given atom 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim2 38878*	Construct 2 new layers on top of 2 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim3 38879*	Construct a new layer on top of 3 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	2dim 38880*	Generate a height-3 element (2-dimensional plane) from an atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	1dimN 38881*	An atom is covered by a height-2 element (1-dimensional line). (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞))
Theorem	1cvrco 38882	The orthocomplement of an element covered by 1 is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶 1 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	1cvratex 38883*	There exists an atom less than an element covered by 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑋)
Theorem	1cvratlt 38884	An atom less than or equal to an element covered by 1 is less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋)
Theorem	1cvrjat 38885	An element covered by the lattice unity, when joined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 )
Theorem	1cvrat 38886	Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unity. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ps-1 38887	The join of two atoms 𝑅 ∨ 𝑆 (specifying a projective geometry line) is determined uniquely by any two atoms (specifying two points) less than or equal to that join. Part of Lemma 16.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 69, showing projective space postulate PS1 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	ps-2 38888*	Lattice analogue for the projective geometry axiom, "if a line intersects two sides of a triangle at different points then it also intersects the third side." Projective space condition PS2 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 68 and part of Theorem 16.4 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)))
Theorem	2atjlej 38889	Two atoms are different if their join majorizes the join of two different atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)
Theorem	hlatexch3N 38890	Rearrange join of atoms in an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	hlatexch4 38891	Exchange 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆))
Theorem	ps-2b 38892	Variation of projective geometry axiom ps-2 38888. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	3atlem1 38893	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3atlem2 38894	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3atlem3 38895	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3atlem4 38896	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	3atlem5 38897	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3atlem6 38898	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3atlem7 38899	Lemma for 3at 38900. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	3at 38900	Any three non-colinear atoms in a (lattice) plane determine the plane uniquely. This is the 2-dimensional analogue of ps-1 38887 for lines and 4at 39023 for volumes. I could not find this proof in the literature on projective geometry (where it is either given as an axiom or stated as an unproved fact), but it is similar to Theorem 15 of Veblen, "The Foundations of Geometry" (1911), p. 18, which uses different axioms. This proof was written before I became aware of Veblen's, and it is possible that a shorter proof could be obtained by using Veblen's proof for hints. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ↔ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)))