P. 407 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40601-40700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cdlemg10bALTN 40601	TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Can this be moved up as a stand-alone theorem in ltrn* area? TODO: Compare this proof to cdlemg2m 40569 and pick best, if moved to ltrn* area. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg11a 40602	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ≠ 𝑃)
Theorem	cdlemg11aq 40603	TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: can proof using this be restructured to use cdlemg11a 40602? (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	cdlemg10c 40604	TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Can this be moved up as a stand-alone theorem in trl* area? (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) → ((𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg10a 40605	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))
Theorem	cdlemg10 40606	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdlemg11b 40607	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≠ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg12a 40608	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ≠ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑈))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑈)) ≤ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	cdlemg12b 40609	The triples ⟨𝑃, (𝐹‘𝑃), (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))⟩ and ⟨𝑄, (𝐹‘𝑄), (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))⟩ are centrally perspective. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄))) ≤ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))))
Theorem	cdlemg12c 40610	The triples ⟨𝑃, (𝐹‘𝑃), (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))⟩ and ⟨𝑄, (𝐹‘𝑄), (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))⟩ are axially perspective by dalaw 39851. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃)) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐺‘𝑄))) ≤ ((((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑄) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ∨ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	cdlemg12d 40611	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∨ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	cdlemg12e 40612	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) ∨ 𝑄)) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	cdlemg12f 40613	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg12g 40614	TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Combine with cdlemg12f 40613. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg12 40615	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg13a 40616	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) = ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))))
Theorem	cdlemg13 40617	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg14f 40618	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg14g 40619	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) = 𝑃)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg15a 40620	Eliminate the (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 condition from cdlemg13 40617. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg15 40621	Eliminate the ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) condition from cdlemg13 40617. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg16 40622	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116; 2nd line p. 117, which says that (our) cdlemg10 40606 "implies (2)" (of p. 116). No details are provided by the authors, so there may be a shorter proof; but ours requires the 14 lemmas, one using Desargues's law dalaw 39851, in order to make this inference. This final step eliminates the (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) condition from cdlemg12 40615. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: should we also eliminate 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 here (or earlier)? Do it if we don't need to add it in for something else later. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg16ALTN 40623	This version of cdlemg16 40622 uses cdlemg15a 40620 instead of cdlemg15 40621, in case cdlemg15 40621 ends up not being needed. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg16z 40624	Eliminate ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) condition from cdlemg16 40622. TODO: would it help to also eliminate 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 here or later? (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg16zz 40625	Eliminate 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 from cdlemg16z 40624. TODO: Use this only if needed. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg17a 40626	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑃) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdlemg17b 40627*	Part of proof of Lemma G in [Crawley] p. 117, 4th line. Whenever (in their terminology) p ∨ q/0 (i.e. the sublattice from 0 to p ∨ q) contains precisely three atoms and g is not the identity, g(p) = q. See also comments under cdleme0nex 40255. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdlemg17dN 40628*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑅‘𝐺) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg17dALTN 40629	Same as cdlemg17dN 40628 with fewer antecedents but longer proof TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑅‘𝐺) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg17e 40630*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))
Theorem	cdlemg17f 40631*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃))))
Theorem	cdlemg17g 40632*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg17h 40633*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ 𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg17i 40634*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃)) = (𝐹‘𝑄))
Theorem	cdlemg17ir 40635*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = (𝐹‘𝑄))
Theorem	cdlemg17j 40636*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)))
Theorem	cdlemg17pq 40637*	Utility theorem for swapping 𝑃 and 𝑄. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑄) ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟)))))
Theorem	cdlemg17bq 40638*	cdlemg17b 40627 with 𝑃 and 𝑄 swapped. Antecedent 𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝑊) is redundant for easier use. TODO: should we have redundant antecedent for cdlemg17b 40627 also? (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘𝑄) = 𝑃)
Theorem	cdlemg17iqN 40639*	cdlemg17i 40634 with 𝑃 and 𝑄 swapped. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑄)) = (𝐹‘𝑃))
Theorem	cdlemg17irq 40640*	cdlemg17ir 40635 with 𝑃 and 𝑄 swapped. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)) = (𝐹‘𝑃))
Theorem	cdlemg17jq 40641*	cdlemg17j 40636 with 𝑃 and 𝑄 swapped. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑄)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg17 40642*	Part of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 117, lines 7 and 8. We show an argument whose value at 𝐺 equals itself. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝐺‘((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))))) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))))
Theorem	cdlemg18a 40643	Show two lines are different. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑄) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)))
Theorem	cdlemg18b 40644	Lemma for cdlemg18c 40645. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑄) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemg18c 40645	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑄) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdlemg18d 40646*	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdlemg18 40647*	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdlemg19a 40648*	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄)))) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg19 40649*	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg20 40650*	Show two lines intersect at an atom. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg21 40651*	Version of cdlemg19 with (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) instead of (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) as a condition. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg22 40652*	cdlemg21 40651 with (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 condition removed. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg24 40653*	Combine cdlemg16z 40624 and cdlemg22 40652. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg37 40654*	Use cdlemg8 40596 to eliminate the ≠ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) condition of cdlemg24 40653. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg25zz 40655	cdlemg16zz 40625 restated for easier studying. TODO: Discard this after everything is figured out. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑧))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑧 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg26zz 40656	cdlemg16zz 40625 restated for easier studying. TODO: Discard this after everything is figured out. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐺) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑧))) → ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑧 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg27a 40657	For use with case when (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) or (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) is zero, letting us establish ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) via 4atex 40041. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	cdlemg28a 40658	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116. First equality of the equation of line 14 on p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑧 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg31b0N 40659	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑁 = (0.‘𝐾)))
Theorem	cdlemg31b0a 40660	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹))) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑁 = (0.‘𝐾)))
Theorem	cdlemg27b 40661	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑁)) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	cdlemg31a 40662	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇)) → 𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))
Theorem	cdlemg31b 40663	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇)) → 𝑁 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))
Theorem	cdlemg31c 40664	Show that when 𝑁 is an atom, it is not under 𝑊. TODO: Is there a shorter direct proof? TODO: should we eliminate (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 here? (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdlemg31d 40665	Eliminate (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 from cdlemg31c 40664. TODO: Prove directly. TODO: do we need to eliminate (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃? It might be better to do this all at once at the end. See also cdlemg29 40670 versus cdlemg28 40669. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdlemg33b0 40666*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33c0 40667*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣)))
Theorem	cdlemg28b 40668*	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116. Second equality of the equation of line 14 on p. 117. Note that ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 is redundant here (but simplifies cdlemg28 40669.) (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣)) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃))) → ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑧 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg28 40669*	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116. Chain the equalities of line 14 on p. 117. TODO: rearrange hypotheses in the order of cdlemg29 40670 (and maybe leading up to this too)? (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣)) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg29 40670*	Eliminate (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 and (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 from cdlemg28 40669. TODO: would it be better to do this later? (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg33a 40671*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33b 40672*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑂 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33c 40673*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑂 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33d 40674*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33e 40675*	TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑁 = (0.‘𝐾) ∧ 𝑂 = (0.‘𝐾)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg33 40676*	Combine cdlemg33b 40672, cdlemg33c 40673, cdlemg33d 40674, cdlemg33e 40675. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑣))))
Theorem	cdlemg34 40677*	Use cdlemg33 to eliminate 𝑧 from cdlemg29 40670. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg35 40678*	TODO: Fix comment. TODO: should we have a more general version of hlsupr 39351 to avoid the ≠ conditions? (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∧ 𝑣 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))))
Theorem	cdlemg36 40679*	Use cdlemg35 to eliminate 𝑣 from cdlemg34 40677. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg38 40680	Use cdlemg37 40654 to eliminate ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 from cdlemg36 40679. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg39 40681	Eliminate ≠ conditions from cdlemg38 40680. TODO: Would this better be done at cdlemg35 40678? TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg40 40682	Eliminate 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 conditions from cdlemg39 40681. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) → ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃))) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑄))) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemg41 40683	Convert cdlemg40 40682 to function composition. TODO: Fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) → ((𝑃 ∨ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑃)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑄 ∨ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑄)) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	ltrnco 40684	The composition of two translations is a translation. Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, line 15 on p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	trlcocnv 40685	Swap the arguments of the trace of a composition with converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = (𝑅‘(𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐹)))
Theorem	trlcoabs 40686	Absorption into a composition by joining with trace. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) = ((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)))
Theorem	trlcoabs2N 40687	Absorption of the trace of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘(𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐹))) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝐺‘𝑃)))
Theorem	trlcoat 40688	The trace of a composition of two translations is an atom if their traces are different. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) → (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	trlcocnvat 40689	Commonly used special case of trlcoat 40688. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) → (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺)) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	trlconid 40690	The composition of two different translations is not the identity translation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵))
Theorem	trlcolem 40691	Lemma for trlco 40692. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) ≤ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))
Theorem	trlco 40692	The trace of a composition of translations is less than or equal to the join of their traces. Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, second paragraph on p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) ≤ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺)))
Theorem	trlcone 40693	If two translations have different traces, the trace of their composition is also different. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐺 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵))) → (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)))
Theorem	cdlemg42 40694	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, first line of third paragraph on p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → ¬ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)))
Theorem	cdlemg43 40695	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, third line of third paragraph on p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = (((𝐺‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐺))))
Theorem	cdlemg44a 40696	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, fourth line of third paragraph on p. 117: "so fg(p) = gf(p)." (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺))) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃)))
Theorem	cdlemg44b 40697	Eliminate (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃, (𝐺‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 from cdlemg44a 40696. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑃)) = (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑃)))
Theorem	cdlemg44 40698	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, fifth line of third paragraph on p. 117: "and hence fg = gf." (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	cdlemg47a 40699	TODO: fix comment. TODO: Use this above in place of (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃 antecedents? (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝐹 = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	cdlemg46 40700*	Part of proof of Lemma G of [Crawley] p. 116, seventh line of third paragraph on p. 117: "hf and f have different traces." (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐹 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅‘ℎ) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹))) → (𝑅‘(ℎ ∘ 𝐹)) ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹))