P. 407 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40601-40700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2llnma1b 40601	Generalization of 2llnma1 40602. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑃)
Theorem	2llnma1 40602	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑄)
Theorem	2llnma3r 40603	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2 40604	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2rN 40605	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
21.28.13  Construction of a vector space from a Hilbert lattice
Theorem	cdlema1N 40606	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdlema2N 40607	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑅 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	cdlemblem 40608	Lemma for cdlemb 40609. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 < 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢)))) → (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemb 40609*	Given two atoms not less than or equal to an element covered by 1, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Syntax	cpadd 40610	Extend class notation with projective subspace sum.
class +𝑃
Definition	df-padd 40611*	Define projective sum of two subspaces (or more generally two sets of atoms), which is the union of all lines generated by pairs of atoms from each subspace. Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. For convenience, our definition is generalized to apply to empty sets. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ +𝑃 = (𝑙 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙), 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙) ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑙) ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝(le‘𝑙)(𝑞(join‘𝑙)𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddfval 40612*	Projective subspace sum operation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → + = (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴, 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddval 40613*	Projective subspace sum operation value. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)}))
Theorem	elpadd 40614*	Member of a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)))))
Theorem	elpaddn0 40615*	Member of projective subspace sum of nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	paddvaln0N 40616*	Projective subspace sum operation value for nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})
Theorem	elpaddri 40617	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpaddatriN 40618	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))
Theorem	elpaddat 40619*	Membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	elpaddatiN 40620*	Consequence of membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑅 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	elpadd2at 40621	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	elpadd2at2 40622	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	paddunssN 40623	Projective subspace sum includes the set union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpadd0 40624	Member of projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddval0 40625	Projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌))
Theorem	padd01 40626	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + ∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	padd02 40627	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddcom 40628	Projective subspace sum commutes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddssat 40629	A projective subspace sum is a set of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	sspadd1 40630	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its first summand. (ssun1 4134 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	sspadd2 40631	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its second summand. (ssun2 4135 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddss1 40632	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss1 4141 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss2 40633	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss2 4143 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑍 + 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddss12 40634	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss12 4144 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝑊) → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddasslem1 40635	Lemma for paddass 40653. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem2 40636	Lemma for paddass 40653. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem3 40637*	Lemma for paddass 40653. Restate projective space axiom ps-2 40293. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))))
Theorem	paddasslem4 40638*	Lemma for paddass 40653. Combine paddasslem1 40635, paddasslem2 40636, and paddasslem3 40637. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))
Theorem	paddasslem5 40639	Lemma for paddass 40653. Show 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 by contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) → 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧)
Theorem	paddasslem6 40640	Lemma for paddass 40653. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem7 40641	Lemma for paddass 40653. Combine paddasslem5 40639 and paddasslem6 40640. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem8 40642	Lemma for paddass 40653. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem9 40643	Lemma for paddass 40653. Combine paddasslem7 40641 and paddasslem8 40642. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem10 40644	Lemma for paddass 40653. Use paddasslem4 40638 to eliminate 𝑠 from paddasslem9 40643. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem11 40645	Lemma for paddass 40653. The case when 𝑝 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem12 40646	Lemma for paddass 40653. The case when 𝑥 = 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem13 40647	Lemma for paddass 40653. The case when 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦). (Unlike the proof in Maeda and Maeda, we don't need 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem14 40648	Lemma for paddass 40653. Remove 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧, 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, and ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) from antecedent of paddasslem10 40644, using paddasslem11 40645, paddasslem12 40646, and paddasslem13 40647. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem15 40649	Lemma for paddass 40653. Use elpaddn0 40615 to eliminate 𝑦 and 𝑧 from paddasslem14 40648. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅)) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem16 40650	Lemma for paddass 40653. Use elpaddn0 40615 to eliminate 𝑥 and 𝑟 from paddasslem15 40649. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem17 40651	Lemma for paddass 40653. The case when at least one sum argument is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem18 40652	Lemma for paddass 40653. Combine paddasslem16 40650 and paddasslem17 40651. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddass 40653	Projective subspace sum is associative. Equation 16.2.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. In our version, the subspaces do not have to be nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd12N 40654	Commutative/associative law for projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) = (𝑌 + (𝑋 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd4N 40655	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddidm 40656	Projective subspace sum is idempotent. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddclN 40657	The projective sum of two subspaces is a subspace. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	paddssw1 40658	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddssw2 40659	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss 40660	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss 4146 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍))
Theorem	pmodlem1 40661*	Lemma for pmod1i 40663. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodlem2 40662	Lemma for pmod1i 40663. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmod1i 40663	The modular law holds in a projective subspace. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmod2iN 40664	Dual of the modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑍 ⊆ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmodN 40665	The modular law for projective subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍))) = ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodl42N 40666	Lemma derived from modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑆)) → (((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) ∩ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + ((𝑋 + 𝑍) ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑊))))
Theorem	pmapjoin 40667	The projective map of the join of two lattice elements. Part of Equation 15.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑌)) ⊆ (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	pmapjat1 40668	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑄)))
Theorem	pmapjat2 40669	The projective map of the join of an atom with a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑄) + (𝑀‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pmapjlln1 40670	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 of two atoms). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	hlmod1i 40671	A version of the modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))))
Theorem	atmod1i1 40672	Version of modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod1i1m 40673	Version of modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when an element meets an atom. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ≤ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	atmod1i2 40674	Version of modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnmod1i2 40675	Version of modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod2i1 40676	Version of modular law pmod2iN 40664 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod2i2 40677	Version of modular law pmod2iN 40664 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	llnmod2i2 40678	Version of modular law pmod1i 40663 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i1 40679	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i2 40680	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑃)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod4i1 40681	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod4i2 40682	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑃 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑋) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnexchb2lem 40683	Lemma for llnexchb2 40684. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	llnexchb2 40684	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexchb2 40150 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	llnexch2N 40685	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexch2 40152 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	dalawlem1 40686	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Special case of dath2 40552, where 𝐶 is replaced by ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)). The remaining lemmas will eliminate the conditions on the atoms imposed by dath2 40552. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem2 40687	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Utility lemma that breaks ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) into a join of two pieces. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ ((((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ∨ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇)))
Theorem	dalawlem3 40688	Lemma for dalaw 40701. First piece of dalawlem5 40690. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem4 40689	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Second piece of dalawlem5 40690. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem5 40690	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) in dalawlem1 40686. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem6 40691	Lemma for dalaw 40701. First piece of dalawlem8 40693. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem7 40692	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Second piece of dalawlem8 40693. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem8 40693	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) in dalawlem1 40686. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem9 40694	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) in dalawlem1 40686. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem10 40695	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Combine dalawlem5 40690, dalawlem8 40693, and dalawlem9 . (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ¬ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem11 40696	Lemma for dalaw 40701. First part of dalawlem13 40698. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem12 40697	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Second part of dalawlem13 40698. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑄 = 𝑅 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem13 40698	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Special case to eliminate the requirement ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 in dalawlem1 40686. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem14 40699	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Combine dalawlem10 40695 and dalawlem13 40698. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ¬ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem15 40700	Lemma for dalaw 40701. Swap variable triples 𝑃𝑄𝑅 and 𝑆𝑇𝑈 in dalawlem14 40699, to obtain the elimination of the remaining conditions in dalawlem1 40686. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ¬ (((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))