P. 384 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38301-38400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rncnv 38301	Range of converse is the domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ran ◡𝐴 = dom 𝐴
Theorem	dfdm6 38302*	Alternate definition of domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	dfrn6 38303*	Alternate definition of range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ran 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]◡𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	rncnvepres 38304	The range of the restricted converse epsilon is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ran (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	dmecd 38305	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8795). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmec2d 38306	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8795). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅))
Theorem	brid 38307	Property of the identity binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 I 𝐴)
Theorem	ideq2 38308	For sets, the identity binary relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	idresssidinxp 38309	Condition for the identity restriction to be a subclass of identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
Theorem	idreseqidinxp 38310	Condition for the identity restriction to be equal to the identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	extid 38311	Property of identity relation, see also extep 38284, extssr 38510 and the comment of df-ssr 38499. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]◡ I = [𝐵]◡ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	inxpss 38312*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpss 38313*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	ref5 38314*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	inxpss3 38315*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass (see also inxpss 38312). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpss2 38316*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpssidinxp 38317*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 38316. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp 38318*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 38316. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp2 38319*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp3 38320	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp4 38321*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product (see also idinxpssinxp2 38319). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	relcnveq3 38322*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	relcnveq 38323	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅))
Theorem	relcnveq2 38324*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	relcnveq4 38325*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	qsresid 38326	Simplification of a special quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 / 𝑅)
Theorem	n0elqs 38327	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	n0elqs2 38328	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ecex2 38329	Condition for a coset to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	uniqsALTV 38330	The union of a quotient set, like uniqs 8817 but with a weaker antecedent: only the restriction of 𝑅 by 𝐴 needs to be a set, not 𝑅 itself, see e.g. cnvepima 38338. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝑅 “ 𝐴))
Theorem	imaexALTV 38331	Existence of an image of a class. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (cf. imaexg 7935) with weakened antecedent: only the restriction of 𝐴 by a set needs to be a set, not 𝐴 itself, see e.g. cnvepimaex 38337. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	ecexALTV 38332	Existence of a coset, like ecexg 8749 but with a weaker antecedent: only the restriction of 𝑅 by the singleton of 𝐴 needs to be a set, not 𝑅 itself, see e.g. eccnvepex 38336. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]𝑅 ∈ V)
Theorem	rnresequniqs 38333	The range of a restriction is equal to the union of the quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	n0el2 38334	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvepresex 38335	Sethood condition for the restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	eccnvepex 38336	The converse epsilon coset exists. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.)
⊢ [𝐴]◡ E ∈ V
Theorem	cnvepimaex 38337	The image of converse epsilon exists, proof via imaexALTV 38331 (see also cnvepima 38338 and uniexg 7760 for alternate way). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvepima 38338	The image of converse epsilon. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	inex3 38339	Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	inxpex 38340	Sufficient condition for an intersection with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	eqres 38341	Converting a class constant definition by restriction (like df-ers 38664 or df-parts 38766) into a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑆 ↾ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐵)))
Theorem	brrabga 38342*	The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	brcnvrabga 38343*	The law of concretion for the converse of operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ◡{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	opideq 38344	Equality conditions for ordered pairs ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ and ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	iss2 38345	A subclass of the identity relation is the intersection of identity relation with Cartesian product of the domain and range of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ∩ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴)))
Theorem	eldmcnv 38346*	Elementhood in a domain of a converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	dfrel5 38347	Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrel6 38348	Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cnvresrn 38349	Converse restricted to range is converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ↾ ran 𝑅) = ◡𝑅
Theorem	relssinxpdmrn 38350	Subset of restriction, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	cnvref4 38351	Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	cnvref5 38352*	Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass of the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	ecin0 38353*	Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	ecinn0 38354*	Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have some elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	ineleq 38355*	Equivalence of restricted universal quantifications. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	inecmo 38356*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝐵]𝑅 ∩ [𝐶]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑧∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	inecmo2 38357*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	ineccnvmo 38358*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	alrmomorn 38359	Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the range inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	alrmomodm 38360*	Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the domain inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	ineccnvmo2 38361*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the range and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥)
Theorem	inecmo3 38362*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the domain and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	moeu2 38363	Uniqueness is equivalent to non-existence or unique existence. Alternate definition of the at-most-one quantifier, in terms of the existential quantifier and the unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃!𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	mopickr 38364	"At most one" picks a variable value, eliminating an existential quantifier. The proof begins with references *2.21 (pm2.21 123) and *14.26 (eupickbi 2636) from [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104 and p. 183. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	moantr 38365	Sufficient condition for transitivity of conjunctions inside existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜓 → ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	brabidgaw 38366*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5539. Version of brabidga 38367 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2377. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by GG, 2-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	brabidga 38367	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5539. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377, see brabidgaw 38366 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	inxp2 38368*	Intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	opabf 38369	A class abstraction of a collection of ordered pairs with a negated wff is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2019.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = ∅
Theorem	ec0 38370	The empty-coset of a class is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2019.)
⊢ [𝐴]∅ = ∅
Theorem	brcnvin 38371	Intersection with a converse, binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝐴)))
21.26.3  Range Cartesian product
Definition	df-xrn 38372	Define the range Cartesian product of two classes. Definition from [Holmes] p. 40. Membership in this class is characterized by xrnss3v 38373 and brxrn 38375. This is Scott Fenton's df-txp 35855 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 35855. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐴) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrnss3v 38373	A range Cartesian product is a subset of the class of ordered triples. This is Scott Fenton's txpss3v 35879 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 35879. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) ⊆ (V × (V × V))
Theorem	xrnrel 38374	A range Cartesian product is a relation. This is Scott Fenton's txprel 35880 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 35880. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵)
Theorem	brxrn 38375	Characterize a ternary relation over a range Cartesian product. Together with xrnss3v 38373, this characterizes elementhood in a range cross. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	brxrn2 38376*	A characterization of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
Theorem	dfxrn2 38377*	Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
Theorem	xrneq1 38378	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶))
Theorem	xrneq1i 38379	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶)
Theorem	xrneq1d 38380	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶))
Theorem	xrneq2 38381	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrneq2i 38382	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵)
Theorem	xrneq2d 38383	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrneq12 38384	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷))
Theorem	xrneq12i 38385	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷)
Theorem	xrneq12d 38386	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷))
Theorem	elecxrn 38387*	Elementhood in the (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
Theorem	ecxrn 38388*	The (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)})
Theorem	disjressuc2 38389*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjecxrn 38390	Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjecxrncnvep 38391	Two ways of saying that cosets are disjoint, special case of disjecxrn 38390. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjsuc2 38392*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	xrninxp 38393*	Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩))}
Theorem	xrninxp2 38394*	Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑥))}
Theorem	xrninxpex 38395	Sufficient condition for the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ∈ V)
Theorem	inxpxrn 38396	Two ways to express the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⋉ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶))) = ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	br1cnvxrn2 38397*	The converse of a binary relation over a range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
Theorem	elec1cnvxrn2 38398*	Elementhood in the converse range Cartesian product coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
Theorem	rnxrn 38399*	Range of the range Cartesian product of classes. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
Theorem	rnxrnres 38400*	Range of a range Cartesian product with a restricted relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}