| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 384 of 513) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31550) |
(31551-33073) |
(33074-51270) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | bj-opabco 38301* | Composition of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∘ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) = {〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} | ||
| Theorem | bj-xpcossxp 38302 | The composition of two Cartesian products is included in the expected Cartesian product. There is equality if (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅, see xpcogend 15156. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bj-imdirco 38303 | Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by a composition is the composition of the direct images. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐶)‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑅)) = (((𝐵 𝒫* 𝐶)‘𝑆) ∘ ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵)‘𝑅))) | ||
| Syntax | ciminv 38304 | Syntax for the functionalized inverse image. |
| class 𝒫* | ||
| Definition | df-iminv 38305* | Definition of the functionalized inverse image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated inverse image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iminvval 38306* | Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iminvval2 38307* | Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐵)‘𝑅) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑅 “ 𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iminvid 38308 | Functorial property of the inverse image: the inverse image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 𝒫* 𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴)) | ||
We parameterize the set of infinite extended complex numbers ℂ∞ (df-bj-ccinfty 38325) using the real numbers ℝ (df-r 11237) via the function +∞eiτ. Since at that point, we have only defined the set of real numbers but no operations on it, we define a temporary "fractional part" function, which is more convenient to define on the temporary reals R (df-nr 11168) since we can use operations on the latter. We also define the temporary real "one-half" in order to define minus infinity (df-bj-minfty 38337) and then we can define the sets of extended real numbers and of extended complex numbers, and the projective real and complex lines, as well as addition and negation on these, and also the order relation on the extended reals (which bypasses the intermediate definition of a temporary order on the real numbers and then a superseding one on the extended real numbers). | ||
| Syntax | cfractemp 38309 | Syntax for the fractional part of a temporary real. |
| class {R | ||
| Definition | df-bj-fractemp 38310* |
Temporary definition: fractional part of a temporary real.
To understand this definition, recall the canonical injection ω⟶R, 𝑛 ↦ [{𝑥 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑥 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P] ~R where we successively take the successor of 𝑛 to land in positive integers, then take the couple with 1o as second component to land in positive rationals, then take the Dedekind cut that positive rational forms, and finally take the equivalence class of the couple with 1P as second component. Adding one at the beginning and subtracting it at the end is necessary since the constructions used in set.mm use the positive integers, positive rationals, and positive reals as intermediate number systems. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. One could even inline it. The definitive fractional part of an extended or projective complex number will be defined later. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ {R = (𝑥 ∈ R ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ R ((𝑦 = 0R ∨ (0R <R 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 <R 1R)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ([〈{𝑧 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑧 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P〉] ~R +R 𝑦) = 𝑥))) | ||
| Syntax | cinftyexpitau 38311 | Syntax for the function +∞eiτ parameterizing ℂ∞. |
| class +∞eiτ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-inftyexpitau 38312 | Definition of the auxiliary function +∞eiτ parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with {R} to simplify the proof of bj-inftyexpitaudisj 38318. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. TODO: prove only the necessary lemmas to prove ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((+∞eiτ‘𝐴) = (+∞eiτ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ)). (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +∞eiτ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ 〈({R‘(1st ‘𝑥)), {R}〉) | ||
| Syntax | cccinftyN 38313 | Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. |
| class ℂ∞N | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccinftyN 38314 | Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞N = ran +∞eiτ | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpitaufo 38315 | The function +∞eiτ written as a surjection with domain and range. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ +∞eiτ:ℝ⟶ontoℂ∞N | ||
| Syntax | chalf 38316 | Syntax for the temporary one-half. |
| class 1/2R | ||
| Definition | df-bj-onehalf 38317 |
Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is
developed,
the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2).
(Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7417) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $. |
| ⊢ 1/2R = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpitaudisj 38318 | An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cinftyexpi 38319 | Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞. |
| class +∞ei | ||
| Definition | df-bj-inftyexpi 38320 | Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 38326. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 38312 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ ( -π(,]π) ↦ 〈𝑥, ℂ〉) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinv 38321 | Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinj 38322 | Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 38321 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( -π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpidisj 38323 | An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cccinfty 38324 | Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞. |
| class ℂ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccinfty 38325 | Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftydisj 38326 | The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-elccinfty 38327 | A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞) | ||
| Syntax | cccbar 38328 | Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. |
| class ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccbar 38329 | Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccssccbar 38330 | Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftyssccbar 38331 | Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Syntax | cpinfty 38332 | Syntax for "plus infinity". |
| class +∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-pinfty 38333 | Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftyccb 38334 | The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynrr 38335 | The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cminfty 38336 | Syntax for "minus infinity". |
| class -∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-minfty 38337 | Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π) | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftyccb 38338 | The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftynrr 38339 | The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynminfty 38340 | The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ | ||
| Syntax | crrbar 38341 | Syntax for the set of extended real numbers. |
| class ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrbar 38342 | Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11374. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cinfty 38343 | Syntax for ∞. |
| class ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-infty 38344 | Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | ccchat 38345 | Syntax for ℂ̂. |
| class ℂ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-cchat 38346 | Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | crrhat 38347 | Syntax for ℝ̂. |
| class ℝ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrhat 38348 | Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrhatsscchat 38349 | The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂ | ||
We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations. | ||
| Syntax | caddcc 38350 | Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers. |
| class +ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-addc 38351 | Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, 〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))〉, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Syntax | coppcc 38352 | Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). |
| class -ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-oppc 38353* | Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ 〈1/2R, 0R〉))))) | ||
In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11375 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11240. | ||
| Syntax | cltxr 38354 | Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. |
| class <ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-lt 38355* | Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑦, 0R〉 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑧, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞}))) | ||
Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 38359. | ||
| Syntax | carg 38356 | Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. |
| class Arg | ||
| Definition | df-bj-arg 38357 | Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in ( -π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 38312), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π)))) | ||
| Syntax | cmulc 38358 | Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers. |
| class ·ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-mulc 38359 |
Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex
projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is
0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves
products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication
is not continuous at these points. This convention entails
(0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 38361).
This definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ)))))) | ||
| Syntax | cinvc 38360 | Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers. |
| class ·-1 | ||
| Definition | df-bj-invc 38361* | Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (·-1‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (·-1‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. This definition relies on df-bj-mulc 38359, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·-1 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0))) | ||
| Syntax | ciomnn 38362 | Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). |
| class iω↪ℕ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-iomnn 38363* |
Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪
{ω}) onto
(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 38310 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 38372 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})⟶1-1onto(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω⟶1-1ontoℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ 〈[〈{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P〉] ~R , 0R〉) ∪ {〈ω, +∞〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-imafv 38364 | If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-funun 38365 | Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn1 38366 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn2 38367 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun1 38368 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun2 38369 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7211. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn1 38370* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn2 38371* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iomnnom 38372 | The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞ | ||
| Syntax | cnnbar 38373 | Syntax for the extended natural numbers. |
| class ℕ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-nnbar 38374 | Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzbar 38375 | Syntax for the extended integers. |
| class ℤ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzbar 38376 | Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzhat 38377 | Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers. |
| class ℤ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzhat 38378 | Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cdivc 38379 | Syntax for the divisibility relation. |
| class ∥ℂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-divc 38380* |
Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16452).
Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∥ℂ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} | ||
See ccmn 20024 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 20024. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 20025 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency. | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgm 38381 | Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgmel 38382 | Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm) | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrp 38383 | Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrpel 38384 | Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmnd 38385 | Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmndel 38386 | Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 20041, which relies on iscmn 20033. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmnd 38387 | Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmndel 38388 | Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 19180. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrp 38389 | Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrpel 38390 | Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 20029. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmn 38391 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmnel 38392 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 20031. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-modssabl 38393 | (The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 21214; see also lmodgrp 21172 and lmodcmn 21215.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmod 38394 | Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmodel 38395 | Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21411. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod) | ||
UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17642 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand). | ||
| Syntax | cfinsum 38396 | Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids". |
| class FinSum | ||
| Definition | df-bj-finsum 38397* | Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1ontodom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-finsumval0 38398* | Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼))))) | ||
A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls. | ||
In this section, we introduce real vector spaces. | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvimacnv0 38399 | Variant of fvimacnv 7075 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. This antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 48396. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isvec 38400 | The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |