| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 403 of 510) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31454) |
(31455-32977) |
(32978-50912) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | oldmj4 40201 | De Morgan's law for join in an ortholattice. (chdmj4 32068 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | olj01 40202 | An ortholattice element joined with zero equals itself. (chj0 32033 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ 0 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | olj02 40203 | An ortholattice element joined with zero equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 ∨ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | olm11 40204 | The meet of an ortholattice element with one equals itself. (chm1i 31992 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 1 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | olm12 40205 | The meet of an ortholattice element with one equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | latmassOLD 40206 | Ortholattice meet is associative. (This can also be proved for lattices with a longer proof.) (inass 4172 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | latm12 40207 | A rearrangement of lattice meet. (in12 4173 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | latm32 40208 | A rearrangement of lattice meet. (in12 4173 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | latmrot 40209 | Rotate lattice meet of 3 classes. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑍 ∧ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | latm4 40210 | Rearrangement of lattice meet of 4 classes. (in4 4178 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑍 ∧ 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | latmmdiN 40211 | Lattice meet distributes over itself. (inindi 4179 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | latmmdir 40212 | Lattice meet distributes over itself. (inindir 4180 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | olm01 40213 | Meet with lattice zero is zero. (chm0 32027 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | olm02 40214 | Meet with lattice zero is zero. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | isoml 40215* | The predicate "is an orthomodular lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))) | ||
| Theorem | isomliN 40216* | Properties that determine an orthomodular lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OL & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OML | ||
| Theorem | omlol 40217 | An orthomodular lattice is an ortholattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OL) | ||
| Theorem | omlop 40218 | An orthomodular lattice is an orthoposet. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OP) | ||
| Theorem | omllat 40219 | An orthomodular lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
| Theorem | omllaw 40220 | The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))) | ||
| Theorem | omllaw2N 40221 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition of OML law in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml2i 32121 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | omllaw3 40222 | Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31972 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | omllaw4 40223 | Orthomodular law equivalent. Remark in [Holland95] p. 223. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | omllaw5N 40224 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml5 32149 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cmtcomlemN 40225 | Lemma for cmtcomN 40226. (cmcmlem 32127 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 → 𝑌𝐶𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cmtcomN 40226 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (cmcmi 32128 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑌𝐶𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | cmt2N 40227 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (cmcm2i 32129 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cmt3N 40228 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 32131 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cmt4N 40229 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 32131 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cmtbr2N 40230 | Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr2i 32132 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))))) | ||
| Theorem | cmtbr3N 40231 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr3 32144 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cmtbr4N 40232 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (cmbr4i 32137 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lecmtN 40233 | Ordered elements commute. (lecmi 32138 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cmtidN 40234 | Any element commutes with itself. (cmidi 32146 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋𝐶𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | omlfh1N 40235 | Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 1. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Part of Theorem 5 in [Kalmbach] p. 25. (fh1 32154 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | omlfh3N 40236 | Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 3. Dual of omlfh1N 40235. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | omlmod1i2N 40237 | Analogue of modular law atmod1i2 40836 that holds in any OML. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | omlspjN 40238 | Contraction of a Sasaki projection. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋) | ||
| Syntax | ccvr 40239 | Extend class notation with covers relation. |
| class ⋖ | ||
| Syntax | catm 40240 | Extend class notation with atoms. |
| class Atoms | ||
| Syntax | cal 40241 | Extend class notation with atomic lattices. |
| class AtLat | ||
| Syntax | clc 40242 | Extend class notation with lattices with the covering property. |
| class CvLat | ||
| Definition | df-covers 40243* | Define the covers relation ("is covered by") for posets. "𝑎 is covered by 𝑏 " means that 𝑎 is strictly less than 𝑏 and there is nothing in between. See cvrval 40246 for the relation form. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ⋖ = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑏 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑧 ∧ 𝑧(lt‘𝑝)𝑏))}) | ||
| Definition | df-ats 40244* | Define the class of poset atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ Atoms = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑎}) | ||
| Theorem | cvrfval 40245* | Value of covers relation "is covered by". (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦))}) | ||
| Theorem | cvrval 40246* | Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (cvbr 32818 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrlt 40247 | The covers relation implies the less-than relation. (cvpss 32821 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 < 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnbtwn 40248 | There is no element between the two arguments of the covers relation. (cvnbtwn 32822 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ (𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ncvr1 40249 | No element covers the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 1 𝐶𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cvrletrN 40250 | Property of an element above a covering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrval2 40251* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (cvbr2 32819 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 = 𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnbtwn2 40252 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 32823 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnbtwn3 40253 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 32824 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrcon3b 40254 | Contraposition law for the covers relation. (cvcon3 32820 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrle 40255 | The covers relation implies the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnbtwn4 40256 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvnbtwn4 32825 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnle 40257 | The covers relation implies the negation of the converse "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cvrne 40258 | The covers relation implies inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | cvrnrefN 40259 | The covers relation is not reflexive. (cvnref 32827 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | cvrcmp 40260 | If two lattice elements that cover a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍𝐶𝑋 ∧ 𝑍𝐶𝑌)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | cvrcmp2 40261 | If two lattice elements covered by a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | pats 40262* | The set of atoms in a poset. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | isat 40263 | The predicate "is an atom". (ela 32875 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 𝐶𝑃))) | ||
| Theorem | isat2 40264 | The predicate "is an atom". (elatcv0 32877 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | atcvr0 40265 | An atom covers zero. (atcv0 32878 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 𝐶𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | atbase 40266 | An atom is a member of the lattice base set (i.e. a lattice element). (atelch 32880 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | atssbase 40267 | The set of atoms is a subset of the base set. (atssch 32879 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | 0ltat 40268 | An atom is greater than zero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 < 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | leatb 40269 | A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (atss 32882 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑃 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | leat 40270 | A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | leat2 40271 | A nonzero poset element less than or equal to an atom equals the atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃)) → 𝑋 = 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | leat3 40272 | A poset element less than or equal to an atom is either an atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | meetat 40273 | The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | meetat2 40274 | The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 )) | ||
| Definition | df-atl 40275* | Define the class of atomic lattices, in which every nonzero element is greater than or equal to an atom. We also ensure the existence of a lattice zero, since a lattice by itself may not have a zero. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑝(le‘𝑘)𝑥))} | ||
| Theorem | isatl 40276* | The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | atllat 40277 | An atomic lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
| Theorem | atlpos 40278 | An atomic lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) | ||
| Theorem | atl0dm 40279 | Condition necessary for zero element to exist. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | atl0cl 40280 | An atomic lattice has a zero element. We can use this in place of op0cl 40161 for lattices without orthocomplements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 0 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | atl0le 40281 | Orthoposet zero is less than or equal to any element. (ch0le 31977 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | atlle0 40282 | An element less than or equal to zero equals zero. (chle0 31979 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 0 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | atlltn0 40283 | A lattice element greater than zero is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 < 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | isat3 40284* | The predicate "is an atom". (elat2 32876 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑃 → (𝑥 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑥 = 0 ))))) | ||
| Theorem | atn0 40285 | An atom is not zero. (atne0 32881 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | atnle0 40286 | An atom is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | atlen0 40287 | A lattice element is nonzero if an atom is under it. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | atcmp 40288 | If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 32883 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | atncmp 40289 | Frequently-used variation of atcmp 40288. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | atnlt 40290 | Two atoms cannot satisfy the less than relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
| ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 < 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | atcvreq0 40291 | An element covered by an atom must be zero. (atcveq0 32884 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝐶𝑃 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | atncvrN 40292 | Two atoms cannot satisfy the covering relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃𝐶𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | atlex 40293* | Every nonzero element of an atomic lattice is greater than or equal to an atom. (hatomic 32896 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | atnle 40294 | Two ways of expressing "an atom is not less than or equal to a lattice element." (atnssm0 32912 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | atnem0 40295 | The meet of distinct atoms is zero. (atnemeq0 32913 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑄) = 0 )) | ||
| Theorem | atlatmstc 40296* | An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32898 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | atlatle 40297* | The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32907 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | atlrelat1 40298* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32899, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
| Definition | df-cvlat 40299* | Define the class of atomic lattices with the covering property. (This is actually the exchange property, but they are equivalent. The literature usually uses the covering property terminology.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ CvLat = {𝑘 ∈ AtLat ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑏 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)((¬ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)𝑐 ∧ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑏)) → 𝑏(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑎))} | ||
| Theorem | iscvlat 40300* | The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝)))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |