P. 403 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

pm14.122b 40201*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.122c 40202*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123a 40203*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123b 40204*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123c 40205*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.18 40206

Theorem *14.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

iotaequ 40207*

Theorem *14.2 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) = 𝑦

Theorem

iotavalb 40208*

Theorem *14.202 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. A biconditional version of iotaval 6160. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦))

Theorem

iotasbc5 40209*

Theorem *14.205 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

pm14.24 40210*

Theorem *14.24 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

iotavalsb 40211*

Theorem *14.242 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑧]𝜓))

Theorem

sbiota1 40212

Theorem *14.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

sbaniota 40213

Theorem *14.26 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

eubiOLD 40214

Obsolete proof of eubi 2603 as of 7-Oct-2022. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓))

Theorem

iotasbcq 40215

Theorem *14.272 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 193. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜒 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑦]𝜒))

20.33.5  Set Theory

Theorem

elnev 40216*

Any set that contains one element less than the universe is not equal to it. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴} ≠ V)

Theorem

rusbcALT 40217

A version of Russell's paradox which is proven using proper substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V

Theorem

compel 40218

Equivalence between two ways of saying "is a member of the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)

Theorem

compeq 40219*

Equality between two ways of saying "the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}

Theorem

compne 40220

The complement of 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴

Theorem

compneOLD 40221

Obsolete proof of compne 40220 as of 11-Nov-2021. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴

Theorem

compab 40222

Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Theorem

conss2 40223

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐴))

Theorem

conss1 40224

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (V ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)

Theorem

ralbidar 40225

More general form of ralbida 3171. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

rexbidar 40226

More general form of rexbida 3255. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

dropab1 40227

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

dropab2 40228

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

ipo0 40229

If the identity relation partially orders any class, then that class is the null class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

ifr0 40230

A class that is founded by the identity relation is null. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

ordpss 40231

ordelpss 6054 with an antecedent removed. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Theorem

fvsb 40232*

Explicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ([(𝐹‘𝐴) / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

fveqsb 40233*

Implicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

xpexb 40234

A Cartesian product exists iff its converse does. Corollary 6.9(1) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∈ V)

Theorem

trelpss 40235

An element of a transitive set is a proper subset of it. Theorem 7.2 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. Unlike tz7.2 5387, ax-reg 8849 is required for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)

20.33.6  Arithmetic

Theorem

addcomgi 40236

Generalization of commutative law for addition. Simplifies proofs dealing with vectors. However, it is dependent on our particular definition of ordered pair. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)

20.33.7  Geometry

Syntax

cplusr 40237

Introduce the operation of vector addition.

class +_𝑟

Syntax

cminusr 40238

Introduce the operation of vector subtraction.

class -_𝑟

Syntax

ctimesr 40239

Introduce the operation of scalar multiplication.

class ._𝑣

Syntax

cptdfc 40240

PtDf is a predicate that is crucial for the definition of lines as well as proving a number of important theorems.

class PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵)

Syntax

crr3c 40241

RR3 is a class.

class RR3

Syntax

cline3 40242

line3 is a class.

class line3

Definition

df-addr 40243*

Define the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ +_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) + (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-subr 40244*

Define the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ -_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) − (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-mulv 40245*

Define the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ._𝑣 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 · (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrval 40246*

Value of the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) + (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

subrval 40247*

Value of the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) − (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

mulvval 40248*

Value of the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrfv 40249

Vector addition at a value. The operation takes each vector 𝐴 and 𝐵 and forms a new vector whose values are the sum of each of the values of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴+_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) + (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

subrfv 40250

Vector subtraction at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴-_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) − (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

mulvfv 40251

Scalar multiplication at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴._𝑣𝐵)‘𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

addrfn 40252

Vector addition produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

subrfn 40253

Vector subtraction produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

mulvfn 40254

Scalar multiplication producees a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

addrcom 40255

Vector addition is commutative. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝐵+_𝑟𝐴))

Definition

df-ptdf 40256*

Define the predicate PtDf, which is a utility definition used to shorten definitions and simplify proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (((𝑥._𝑣(𝐵-_𝑟𝐴)) +_𝑣 𝐴) “ {1, 2, 3}))

Definition

df-rr3 40257

Define the set of all points RR3. We define each point 𝐴 as a function to allow the use of vector addition and subtraction as well as scalar multiplication in our proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ RR3 = (ℝ ↑_𝑚 {1, 2, 3})

Definition

df-line3 40258*

Define the set of all lines. A line is an infinite subset of RR3 that satisfies a PtDf property. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ line3 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 RR3 ∣ (2_o ≼ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 → ran PtDf(𝑦, 𝑧) = 𝑥))}

20.34  Mathbox for Alan Sare

We are sad to report the passing of long-time contributor Alan Sare (Nov. 9, 1954 - Mar. 23, 2019).

Alan's first contribution to Metamath was a shorter proof for tfrlem8 7822 in 2008.

He developed a tool called "completeusersproof" that assists developing proofs using his "virtual deduction" method: https://us.metamath.org/other.html#completeusersproof. His virtual deduction method is explained in the comment for wvd1 40351.

Below are some excerpts from his first emails to NM in 2007:

...I have been interested in proving set theory theorems for many years for mental exercise. I enjoy it. I have used a book by Martin Zuckerman. It is informal. I am interested in completely and perfectly proving theorems. Mr. Zuckerman leaves out most of the steps of a proof, of course, like most authors do, as you have noted. A complete proof for higher theorems would require a volume of writing similar to the Metamath documents. So I am frustrated when I am not capable of constructing a proof and Zuckerman leaves out steps I do not understand. I could search for the steps in other texts, but I don't do that too much. Metamath may be the answer for me....

...If we go beyond mathematics, I believe that it is possible to write down all human knowledge in a way similar to the way you have explicated large areas of mathematics. Of course, that would be a much, much more difficult job. For example, it is possible to take a hard science like physics, construct axioms based on experimental results, and to cast all of physics into a collection of axioms and theorems. Maybe this has already been attempted, although I am not familiar with it. When one then moves on to the soft sciences such as social science, this job gets much more difficult. The key is: All human thought consists of logical operations on abstract objects. Usually, these logical operations are done informally. There is no reason why one cannot take any subject and explicate it and take it down to the indivisible postulates in a formal rigorous way....

...When I read a math book or an engineering book I come across something I don't understand and I am compelled to understand it. But, often it is hopeless. I don't have the time. Or, I would have to read the same thing by multiple authors in the hope that different authors would give parts of the working proof that others have omitted. It is very inefficient. Because I have always been inclined to "get to the bottom" for a 100% fully understood proof....

20.34.1  Auxiliary theorems for the Virtual Deduction tool

Theorem

idiALT 40259

Placeholder for idi 1. Though unnecessary, this theorem is sometimes used in proofs in this mathbox for pedagogical purposes. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑

Theorem

exbir 40260

Exportation implication also converting the consequent from a biconditional to an implication. Derived automatically from exbirVD 40635. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

3impexpbicom 40261

Version of 3impexp 1338 where in addition the consequent is commuted. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))

Theorem

3impexpbicomi 40262

Inference associated with 3impexpbicom 40261. Derived automatically from 3impexpbicomiVD 40640. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

20.34.2  Supplementary unification deductions

Theorem

bi1imp 40263

Importation inference similar to imp 398, except the outermost implication of the hypothesis is a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi2imp 40264

Importation inference similar to imp 398, except both implications of the hypothesis are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi3impb 40265

Similar to 3impb 1095 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi3impa 40266

Similar to 3impa 1090 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23impib 40267

3impib 1096 with the inner implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impib 40268

3impib 1096 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impib 40269

3impib 1096 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impia 40270

3impia 1097 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impia 40271

3impia 1097 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi33imp12 40272

3imp 1091 with innermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23imp13 40273

3imp 1091 with middle implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp23 40274

3imp 1091 with outermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp2 40275

Similar to 3imp 1091 except the outermost and innermost implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi12imp3 40276

Similar to 3imp 1091 except all but innermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23imp1 40277

Similar to 3imp 1091 except all but outermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123imp0 40278

Similar to 3imp 1091 except all implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

4animp1 40279

A single hypothesis unification deduction with an assertion which is an implication with a 4-right-nested conjunction antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an31 40280

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an4132 40281

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

expcomdg 40282

Biconditional form of expcomd 409. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

20.34.3  Conventional Metamath proofs, some derived from VD proofs

Theorem

iidn3 40283

idn3 40397 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

ee222 40284

e222 40418 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 7-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee3bir 40285

Right-biconditional form of e3 40519 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))

Theorem

ee13 40286

e13 40530 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))

Theorem

ee121 40287

e121 40438 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee122 40288

e122 40435 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee333 40289

e333 40515 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

ee323 40290

e323 40548 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

3ornot23 40291

If the second and third disjuncts of a true triple disjunction are false, then the first disjunct is true. Automatically derived from 3ornot23VD 40629. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))

Theorem

orbi1r 40292

orbi1 901 with order of disjuncts reversed. Derived from orbi1rVD 40630. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))

Theorem

3orbi123 40293

pm4.39 959 with a 3-conjunct antecedent. This proof is 3orbi123VD 40632 automatically translated and minimized. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)))

Theorem

syl5imp 40294

Closed form of syl5 34. Derived automatically from syl5impVD 40645. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

impexpd 40295

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. After the User's Proof was completed, it was minimized. The completed User's Proof before minimization is not shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
qed:1:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

com3rgbi 40296

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
4::	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
5::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
6:4,5:	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:3,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

impexpdcom 40297

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

ee1111 40298

Non-virtual deduction form of e1111 40457. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
h3::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
h4::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
h5::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
6:1,5:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
7:6:	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
8:2,7:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
9:8:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
10:9:	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
11:3,10:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
12:11:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
13:12:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
14:4,13:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
qed:14:	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

Theorem

pm2.43bgbi 40299

Logical equivalence of a 2-left-nested implication and a 1-left-nested implicated when two antecedents of the former implication are identical. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
5:3,4:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
6::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
qed:5,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

pm2.43cbi 40300

Logical equivalence of a 3-left-nested implication and a 2-left-nested implicated when two antecedents of the former implication are identical. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
4::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
5:3,4:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
6::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))))
qed:5,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))