P. 403 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40201-40300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	evlsmulval 40201	Polynomial evaluation builder for multiplication. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑀)‘𝐴) = 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)‘𝐴) = 𝑊))    &   ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 ∙ 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑀 ∙ 𝑁))‘𝐴) = (𝑉 · 𝑊)))
Theorem	fsuppind 40202*	Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support, or in other words the base set of the free module (see frlmelbas 20873 and frlmplusgval 20881). This theorem is structurally general for polynomial proof usage (see mplelbas 21109 and mpladd 21123). Note that hypothesis 0 is redundant when 𝐼 is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 finSupp 0 )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	fsuppssindlem1 40203*	Lemma for fsuppssind 40205. Functions are zero outside of their support. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆)‘𝑥), 0 )))
Theorem	fsuppssindlem2 40204*	Lemma for fsuppssind 40205. Write a function as a union. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, (𝑓‘𝑥), 0 )) ∈ 𝐻} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∪ ((𝐼 ∖ 𝑆) × { 0 })) ∈ 𝐻)))
Theorem	fsuppssind 40205*	Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support (see fsuppind 40202) whose supports are subsets of 𝑆. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jun-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 finSupp 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	mhpind 40206*	The homogeneous polynomials of degree 𝑁 are generated by the terms of degree 𝑁 and addition. (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺))) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	mhphflem 40207*	Lemma for mhphf 40208. Add several multiples of 𝐿 together, in a case where the total amount of multiplies is 𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ · = (.g‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐺 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑣) · 𝐿))) = (𝑁 · 𝐿))
Theorem	mhphf 40208	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function. Equivalently, an algebraic form is a homogeneous function. (An algebraic form is the function corresponding to a homogeneous polynomial, which in this case is the (𝑄‘𝑋) which corresponds to 𝑋). (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘((𝐼 × {𝐿}) ∘f · 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	mhphf2 40209	A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf 40208 with simpler notation in the conclusion in exchange for a complex definition of ∙, which is based on frlmvscafval 20883 but without the finite support restriction (frlmpws 20867, frlmbas 20872) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. TODO?: Polynomials (df-mpl 21024) are defined to have a finite amount of terms (of finite degree). As such, any assignment may be replaced by an assignment with finite support (as only a finite amount of variables matter in a given polynomial, even if the set of variables is infinite). So the finite support restriction can be assumed without loss of generality. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘((ringLMod‘𝑆) ↑s 𝐼))    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴)))
20.26.4  Arithmetic theorems Towards the start of this section are several proofs regarding the different complex number axioms that could be used to prove some results. For example, ax-1rid 10872 is used in mulid1 10904 related theorems, so one could trade off the extra axioms in mulid1 10904 for the axioms needed to prove that something is a real number. Another example is avoiding complex number closure laws by using real number closure laws and then using ax-resscn 10859; in the other direction, real number closure laws can be avoided by using ax-resscn 10859 and then the complex number closure laws. (This only works if the result of (𝐴 + 𝐵) only needs to be a complex number). The natural numbers are especially amenable to axiom reductions, as the set ℕ is the recursive set {1, (1 + 1), ((1 + 1) + 1)}, etc., i.e. the set of numbers formed by only additions of 1. The digits 2 through 9 are defined so that they expand into additions of 1. This makes adding natural numbers conveniently only require the rearrangement of parentheses, as shown with the following: (4 + 3) = 7 ((3 + 1) + (2 + 1)) = (6 + 1) ((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + ((1 + 1) + 1)) = ((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) This only requires ax-addass 10867, ax-1cn 10860, and ax-addcl 10862. (And in practice, the expression isn't completely expanded into ones.) Multiplication by 1 requires either mulid2i 10911 or (ax-1rid 10872 and 1re 10906) as seen in 1t1e1 12065 and 1t1e1ALT 40213. Multiplying with greater natural numbers uses ax-distr 10869. Still, this takes fewer axioms than adding zero, which is often implicit in theorems such as (9 + 1) = ;10. Adding zero uses almost every complex number axiom, though notably not ax-mulcom 10866 (see readdid1 40313 and readdid2 40307).
Theorem	c0exALT 40210	Alternate proof of c0ex 10900 using more set theory axioms but fewer complex number axioms (add ax-10 2139, ax-11 2156, ax-13 2372, ax-nul 5225, and remove ax-1cn 10860, ax-icn 10861, ax-addcl 10862, and ax-mulcl 10864). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ V
Theorem	0cnALT3 40211	Alternate proof of 0cn 10898 using ax-resscn 10859, ax-addrcl 10863, ax-rnegex 10873, ax-cnre 10875 instead of ax-icn 10861, ax-addcl 10862, ax-mulcl 10864, ax-i2m1 10870. Version of 0cnALT 11139 using ax-1cn 10860 instead of ax-icn 10861. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	elre0re 40212	Specialized version of 0red 10909 without using ax-1cn 10860 and ax-cnre 10875. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	1t1e1ALT 40213	Alternate proof of 1t1e1 12065 using a different set of axioms (add ax-mulrcl 10865, ax-i2m1 10870, ax-1ne0 10871, ax-rrecex 10874 and remove ax-resscn 10859, ax-mulcom 10866, ax-mulass 10868, ax-distr 10869). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (1 · 1) = 1
Theorem	remulcan2d 40214	mulcan2d 11539 for real numbers using fewer axioms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	readdid1addid2d 40215	Given some real number 𝐵 where 𝐴 acts like a right additive identity, derive that 𝐴 is a left additive identity. Note that the hypothesis is weaker than proving that 𝐴 is a right additive identity (for all numbers). Although, if there is a right additive identity, then by readdcan 11079, 𝐴 is the right additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐶)
Theorem	sn-1ne2 40216	A proof of 1ne2 12111 without using ax-mulcom 10866, ax-mulass 10868, ax-pre-mulgt0 10879. Based on mul02lem2 11082. (Contributed by SN, 13-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 2
Theorem	nnn1suc 40217*	A positive integer that is not 1 is a successor of some other positive integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝑥 + 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnadd1com 40218	Addition with 1 is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) = (1 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcom 40219	Addition is commutative for natural numbers. Uses fewer axioms than addcom 11091. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcomli 40220	Version of addcomli 11097 for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	nnadddir 40221	Right-distributivity for natural numbers without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	nnmul1com 40222	Multiplication with 1 is commutative for natural numbers, without ax-mulcom 10866. Since (𝐴 · 1) is 𝐴 by ax-1rid 10872, this is equivalent to remulid2 40336 for natural numbers, but using fewer axioms (avoiding ax-resscn 10859, ax-addass 10867, ax-mulass 10868, ax-rnegex 10873, ax-pre-lttri 10876, ax-pre-lttrn 10877, ax-pre-ltadd 10878). (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 · 𝐴) = (𝐴 · 1))
Theorem	nnmulcom 40223	Multiplication is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	mvrrsubd 40224	Move a subtraction in the RHS to a right-addition in the LHS. Converse of mvlraddd 11315. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	laddrotrd 40225	Rotate the variables right in an equation with addition on the left, converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvlladdd 11316 with a commuted consequent, and of mvrladdd 11318 with a commuted hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	raddcom12d 40226	Swap the first two variables in an equation with addition on the right, converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvrraddd 11317 with a commuted consequent, and of mvlraddd 11315 with a commuted hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 − 𝐶))
Theorem	lsubrotld 40227	Rotate the variables left in an equation with subtraction on the left, converting it into an addition. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lsubcom23d 40228	Swap the second and third variables in an equation with subtraction on the left, converting it into an addition. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	addsubeq4com 40229	Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	sqsumi 40230	A sum squared. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	negn0nposznnd 40231	Lemma for dffltz 40387. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	sqmid3api 40232	Value of the square of the middle term of a 3-term arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝑁) = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝑁) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝑁 · 𝑁))
Theorem	decaddcom 40233	Commute ones place in addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 + 𝐶) = (;𝐴𝐶 + 𝐵)
Theorem	sqn5i 40234	The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;(𝐴 · (𝐴 + 1))25
Theorem	sqn5ii 40235	The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;𝐶25
Theorem	decpmulnc 40236	Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication, no carry. Compare muladdi 11356. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;;𝐸𝐹𝐺
Theorem	decpmul 40237	Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = ;𝐺𝐻    &   ⊢ (;𝐸𝐺 + 𝐹) = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;𝐼𝐻
Theorem	sqdeccom12 40238	The square of a number in terms of its digits switched. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (;𝐵𝐴 · ;𝐵𝐴)) = (;99 · ((𝐴 · 𝐴) − (𝐵 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	sq3deccom12 40239	Variant of sqdeccom12 40238 with a three digit square. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((;;𝐴𝐵𝐶 · ;;𝐴𝐵𝐶) − (;𝐷𝐵 · ;𝐷𝐵)) = (;99 · ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (𝐶 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	235t711 40240	Calculate a product by long multiplication as a base comparison with other multiplication algorithms. Conveniently, 711 has two ones which greatly simplifies calculations like 235 · 1. There isn't a higher level mulcomli 10915 saving the lower level uses of mulcomli 10915 within 235 · 7 since mulcom2 doesn't exist, but if commuted versions of theorems like 7t2e14 12475 are added then this proof would benefit more than ex-decpmul 40241. For practicality, this proof doesn't have "e167085" at the end of its name like 2p2e4 12038 or 8t7e56 12486. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085
Theorem	ex-decpmul 40241	Example usage of decpmul 40237. This proof is significantly longer than 235t711 40240. There is more unnecessary carrying compared to 235t711 40240. Although saving 5 visual steps, using mulcomli 10915 early on increases the compressed proof length. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085
20.26.5  Exponents and divisibility
Theorem	oexpreposd 40242	Lemma for dffltz 40387. TODO-SN?: This can be used to show exp11d 40246 holds for all integers when the exponent is odd. The more standard ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀 should be used. (Contributed by SN, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑀 / 2) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < 𝑁 ↔ 0 < (𝑁↑𝑀)))
Theorem	ltexp1d 40243	ltmul1d 12742 for exponentiation of positive reals. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	ltexp1dd 40244	Raising both sides of 'less than' to the same positive integer preserves ordering. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁))
Theorem	exp11nnd 40245	sq11d 13903 for positive real bases and positive integer exponents. The base cannot be generalized much further, since if 𝑁 is even then we have 𝐴↑𝑁 = -𝐴↑𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) = (𝐵↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	exp11d 40246	exp11nnd 40245 for nonzero integer exponents. (Contributed by SN, 14-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) = (𝐵↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	0dvds0 40247	0 divides 0. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 0 ∥ 0
Theorem	absdvdsabsb 40248	Divisibility is invariant under taking the absolute value on both sides. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (abs‘𝑀) ∥ (abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsexpim 40249	dvdssqim 16192 generalized to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	gcdnn0id 40250	The gcd of a nonnegative integer and itself is the integer. (Contributed by SN, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 gcd 𝑁) = 𝑁)
Theorem	gcdle1d 40251	The greatest common divisor of a positive integer and another integer is less than or equal to the positive integer. (Contributed by SN, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ≤ 𝑀)
Theorem	gcdle2d 40252	The greatest common divisor of a positive integer and another integer is less than or equal to the positive integer. (Contributed by SN, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) ≤ 𝑁)
Theorem	dvdsexpad 40253	Deduction associated with dvdsexpim 40249. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁))
Theorem	nn0rppwr 40254	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. rppwr 16197 extended to nonnegative integers. Less general than rpexp12i 16357. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1))
Theorem	expgcd 40255	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. sqgcd 16198 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	nn0expgcd 40256	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. nn0gcdsq 16384 extended to nonnegative exponents. expgcd 40255 extended to nonnegative bases. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	zexpgcd 40257	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. zgcdsq 16385 extended to nonnegative exponents. nn0expgcd 40256 extended to integer bases by symmetry. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	numdenexp 40258	numdensq 16386 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((numer‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((numer‘𝐴)↑𝑁) ∧ (denom‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((denom‘𝐴)↑𝑁)))
Theorem	numexp 40259	numsq 16387 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (numer‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((numer‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	denexp 40260	densq 16388 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (denom‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((denom‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsexpnn 40261	dvdssqlem 16199 generalized to positive integer exponents. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsexpnn0 40262	dvdsexpnn 40261 generalized to include zero bases. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	dvdsexpb 40263	dvdssq 16200 generalized to positive integer exponents. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	posqsqznn 40264	When a positive rational squared is an integer, the rational is a positive integer. zsqrtelqelz 16390 with all terms squared and positive. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑2) ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	cxpgt0d 40265	A positive real raised to a real power is positive. (Contributed by SN, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴↑𝑐𝑁))
Theorem	zrtelqelz 40266	zsqrtelqelz 16390 generalized to positive integer roots. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	zrtdvds 40267	A positive integer root divides its integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∥ 𝐴)
Theorem	rtprmirr 40268	The root of a prime number is irrational. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑃↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
20.26.6  Real subtraction
Syntax	cresub 40269	Real number subtraction.
class −ℝ
Definition	df-resub 40270*	Define subtraction between real numbers. This operator saves a few axioms over df-sub 11137 in certain situations. Theorem resubval 40271 shows its value, resubadd 40283 relates it to addition, and rersubcl 40282 proves its closure. It is the restriction of df-sub 11137 to the reals: subresre 40333. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ −ℝ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥))
Theorem	resubval 40271*	Value of real subtraction, which is the (unique) real 𝑥 such that 𝐵 + 𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴))
Theorem	renegeulemv 40272*	Lemma for renegeu 40274 and similar. Derive existential uniqueness from existence. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegeulem 40273*	Lemma for renegeu 40274 and similar. Remove a change in bound variables from renegeulemv 40272. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegeu 40274*	Existential uniqueness of real negatives. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	rernegcl 40275	Closure law for negative reals. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 −ℝ 𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	renegadd 40276	Relationship between real negation and addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 −ℝ 𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 0))
Theorem	renegid 40277	Addition of a real number and its negative. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + (0 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 0)
Theorem	reneg0addid2 40278	Negative zero is a left additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0 −ℝ 0) + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	resubeulem1 40279	Lemma for resubeu 40281. A value which when added to zero, results in negative zero. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 + (0 −ℝ (0 + 0))) = (0 −ℝ 0))
Theorem	resubeulem2 40280	Lemma for resubeu 40281. A value which when added to 𝐴, results in 𝐵. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + ((0 −ℝ 𝐴) + ((0 −ℝ (0 + 0)) + 𝐵))) = 𝐵)
Theorem	resubeu 40281*	Existential uniqueness of real differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	rersubcl 40282	Closure for real subtraction. Based on subcl 11150. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	resubadd 40283	Relation between real subtraction and addition. Based on subadd 11154. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	resubaddd 40284	Relationship between subtraction and addition. Based on subaddd 11280. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	resubf 40285	Real subtraction is an operation on the real numbers. Based on subf 11153. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ −ℝ :(ℝ × ℝ)⟶ℝ
Theorem	repncan2 40286	Addition and subtraction of equals. Compare pncan2 11158. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	repncan3 40287	Addition and subtraction of equals. Based on pncan3 11159. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	readdsub 40288	Law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	reladdrsub 40289	Move LHS of a sum into RHS of a (real) difference. Version of mvlladdd 11316 with real subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐴))
Theorem	reltsub1 40290	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. Compare ltsub1 11401. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) < (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)))
Theorem	reltsubadd2 40291	'Less than' relationship between addition and subtraction. Compare ltsubadd2 11376. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	resubcan2 40292	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare subcan2 11176. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	resubsub4 40293	Law for double subtraction. Compare subsub4 11184. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐶) = (𝐴 −ℝ (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	rennncan2 40294	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare nnncan2 11188. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) −ℝ (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	renpncan3 40295	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare npncan3 11189. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐴)) = (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	repnpcan 40296	Cancellation law for addition and real subtraction. Compare pnpcan 11190. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	reppncan 40297	Cancellation law for mixed addition and real subtraction. Compare ppncan 11193. (Contributed by SN, 3-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 + 𝐵))
Theorem	resubidaddid1lem 40298	Lemma for resubidaddid1 40299. A special case of npncan 11172. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	resubidaddid1 40299	Any real number subtracted from itself forms a left additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) + 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	resubdi 40300	Distribution of multiplication over real subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐶)))