P. 455 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

iotain 45401

Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = (℩𝑥𝜑))

Theorem

iotaexeu 45402

The iota class exists. This theorem does not require ax-nul 5259 for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)

Theorem

iotasbc 45403*

Definition *14.01 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. In Principia Mathematica, Russell and Whitehead define ℩ in terms of a function of (℩𝑥𝜑). Their definition differs in that a function of (℩𝑥𝜑) evaluates to "false" when there isn't a single 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

iotasbc2 45404*

Theorem *14.111 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ((∃!𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦][(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑧]𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝜒)))

Theorem

pm14.12 45405*

Theorem *14.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Theorem

pm14.122a 45406*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.122b 45407*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.122c 45408*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123a 45409*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123b 45410*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123c 45411*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.18 45412

Theorem *14.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

iotaequ 45413*

Theorem *14.2 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) = 𝑦

Theorem

iotavalb 45414*

Theorem *14.202 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. A biconditional version of iotaval 6512. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦))

Theorem

iotasbc5 45415*

Theorem *14.205 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

pm14.24 45416*

Theorem *14.24 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

iotavalsb 45417*

Theorem *14.242 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑧]𝜓))

Theorem

sbiota1 45418

Theorem *14.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

sbaniota 45419

Theorem *14.26 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

iotasbcq 45420

Theorem *14.272 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 193. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜒 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑦]𝜒))

21.42.5  Set Theory

Theorem

elnev 45421*

Any set that contains one element less than the universe is not equal to it. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴} ≠ V)

Theorem

rusbcALT 45422

A version of Russell's paradox which is proven using proper substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V

Theorem

compeq 45423*

Equality between two ways of saying "the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}

Theorem

compne 45424

The complement of 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴

Theorem

compab 45425

Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Theorem

conss2 45426

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐴))

Theorem

conss1 45427

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (V ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)

Theorem

ralbidar 45428

More general form of ralbida 3273. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

rexbidar 45429

More general form of rexbida 3274. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

dropab1 45430

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

dropab2 45431

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

ipo0 45432

If the identity relation partially orders any class, then that class is the null class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

ifr0 45433

A class that is founded by the identity relation is null. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

fvsb 45434*

Explicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ([(𝐹‘𝐴) / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

fveqsb 45435*

Implicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

xpexb 45436

A Cartesian product exists iff its converse does. Corollary 6.9(1) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∈ V)

Theorem

trelpss 45437

An element of a transitive set is a proper subset of it. Theorem 7.2 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. Unlike tz7.2 5633, ax-reg 9586 is required for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)

21.42.6  Arithmetic

Theorem

addcomgi 45438

Generalization of commutative law for addition. Simplifies proofs dealing with vectors. However, it is dependent on our particular definition of ordered pair. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)

21.42.7  Geometry

Syntax

cplusr 45439

Introduce the operation of vector addition.

class +_𝑟

Syntax

cminusr 45440

Introduce the operation of vector subtraction.

class -_𝑟

Syntax

ctimesr 45441

Introduce the operation of scalar multiplication.

class ._𝑣

Syntax

cptdfc 45442

PtDf is a predicate that is crucial for the definition of lines as well as proving a number of important theorems.

class PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵)

Syntax

crr3c 45443

RR3 is a class.

class RR3

Syntax

cline3 45444

line3 is a class.

class line3

Definition

df-addr 45445*

Define the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ +_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) + (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-subr 45446*

Define the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ -_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) − (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-mulv 45447*

Define the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ._𝑣 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 · (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrval 45448*

Value of the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) + (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

subrval 45449*

Value of the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) − (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

mulvval 45450*

Value of the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrfv 45451

Vector addition at a value. The operation takes each vector 𝐴 and 𝐵 and forms a new vector whose values are the sum of each of the values of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴+_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) + (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

subrfv 45452

Vector subtraction at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴-_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) − (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

mulvfv 45453

Scalar multiplication at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴._𝑣𝐵)‘𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

addrfn 45454

Vector addition produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

subrfn 45455

Vector subtraction produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

mulvfn 45456

Scalar multiplication producees a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

addrcom 45457

Vector addition is commutative. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝐵+_𝑟𝐴))

Definition

df-ptdf 45458*

Define the predicate PtDf, which is a utility definition used to shorten definitions and simplify proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (((𝑥._𝑣(𝐵-_𝑟𝐴)) +_𝑣 𝐴) “ {1, 2, 3}))

Definition

df-rr3 45459

Define the set of all points RR3. We define each point 𝐴 as a function to allow the use of vector addition and subtraction as well as scalar multiplication in our proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ RR3 = (ℝ ↑_m {1, 2, 3})

Definition

df-line3 45460*

Define the set of all lines. A line is an infinite subset of RR3 that satisfies a PtDf property. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ line3 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 RR3 ∣ (2_o ≼ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 → ran PtDf(𝑦, 𝑧) = 𝑥))}

21.43  Mathbox for Alan Sare

We are sad to report the passing of long-time contributor Alan Sare (Nov. 9, 1954 - Mar. 23, 2019).

Alan's first contribution to Metamath was a shorter proof for tfrlem8 8392 in 2008.

He developed a tool called "completeusersproof" that assists developing proofs using his "virtual deduction" method: https://us.metamath.org/other.html#completeusersproof 8392. His virtual deduction method is explained in the comment for wvd1 45552.

Below are some excerpts from his first emails to NM in 2007:

...I have been interested in proving set theory theorems for many years for mental exercise. I enjoy it. I have used a book by Martin Zuckerman. It is informal. I am interested in completely and perfectly proving theorems. Mr. Zuckerman leaves out most of the steps of a proof, of course, like most authors do, as you have noted. A complete proof for higher theorems would require a volume of writing similar to the Metamath documents. So I am frustrated when I am not capable of constructing a proof and Zuckerman leaves out steps I do not understand. I could search for the steps in other texts, but I don't do that too much. Metamath may be the answer for me....

...If we go beyond mathematics, I believe that it is possible to write down all human knowledge in a way similar to the way you have explicated large areas of mathematics. Of course, that would be a much, much more difficult job. For example, it is possible to take a hard science like physics, construct axioms based on experimental results, and to cast all of physics into a collection of axioms and theorems. Maybe this has already been attempted, although I am not familiar with it. When one then moves on to the soft sciences such as social science, this job gets much more difficult. The key is: All human thought consists of logical operations on abstract objects. Usually, these logical operations are done informally. There is no reason why one cannot take any subject and explicate it and take it down to the indivisible postulates in a formal rigorous way....

...When I read a math book or an engineering book I come across something I don't understand and I am compelled to understand it. But, often it is hopeless. I don't have the time. Or, I would have to read the same thing by multiple authors in the hope that different authors would give parts of the working proof that others have omitted. It is very inefficient. Because I have always been inclined to "get to the bottom" for a 100% fully understood proof....

21.43.1  Auxiliary theorems for the Virtual Deduction tool

Theorem

idiALT 45461

Placeholder for idi 1. Though unnecessary, this theorem is sometimes used in proofs in this mathbox for pedagogical purposes. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑

Theorem

exbir 45462

Exportation implication also converting the consequent from a biconditional to an implication. Derived automatically from exbirVD 45835. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

3impexpbicom 45463

Version of 3impexp 1377 where in addition the consequent is commuted. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))

Theorem

3impexpbicomi 45464

Inference associated with 3impexpbicom 45463. Derived automatically from 3impexpbicomiVD 45840. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

21.43.2  Supplementary unification deductions

Theorem

bi1imp 45465

Importation inference similar to imp 412, except the outermost implication of the hypothesis is a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi2imp 45466

Importation inference similar to imp 412, except both implications of the hypothesis are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi3impb 45467

Similar to 3impb 1132 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi3impa 45468

Similar to 3impa 1127 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23impib 45469

3impib 1134 with the inner implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impib 45470

3impib 1134 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impib 45471

3impib 1134 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impia 45472

3impia 1135 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impia 45473

3impia 1135 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi33imp12 45474

3imp 1128 with innermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp23 45475

3imp 1128 with outermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp2 45476

Similar to 3imp 1128 except the outermost and innermost implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi12imp3 45477

Similar to 3imp 1128 except all but innermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23imp1 45478

Similar to 3imp 1128 except all but outermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123imp0 45479

Similar to 3imp 1128 except all implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

4animp1 45480

A single hypothesis unification deduction with an assertion which is an implication with a 4-right-nested conjunction antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an31 45481

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an4132 45482

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

expcomdg 45483

Biconditional form of expcomd 422. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

21.43.3  Conventional Metamath proofs, some derived from VD proofs

Theorem

iidn3 45484

idn3 45598 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

ee222 45485

e222 45619 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 7-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee3bir 45486

Right-biconditional form of e3 45719 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))

Theorem

ee13 45487

e13 45730 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))

Theorem

ee121 45488

e121 45639 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee122 45489

e122 45636 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee333 45490

e333 45715 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

ee323 45491

e323 45748 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

3ornot23 45492

If the second and third disjuncts of a true triple disjunction are false, then the first disjunct is true. Automatically derived from 3ornot23VD 45829. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))

Theorem

orbi1r 45493

orbi1 931 with order of disjuncts reversed. Derived from orbi1rVD 45830. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))

Theorem

3orbi123 45494

pm4.39 992 with a 3-conjunct antecedent. This proof is 3orbi123VD 45832 automatically translated and minimized. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)))

Theorem

syl5imp 45495

Closed form of syl5 35. Derived automatically from syl5impVD 45845. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

impexpd 45496

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. After the User's Proof was completed, it was minimized. The completed User's Proof before minimization is not shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
qed:1:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

com3rgbi 45497

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
4::	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
5::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
6:4,5:	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:3,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

impexpdcom 45498

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

ee1111 45499

Non-virtual deduction form of e1111 45658. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
h3::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
h4::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
h5::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
6:1,5:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
7:6:	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
8:2,7:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
9:8:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
10:9:	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
11:3,10:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
12:11:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
13:12:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
14:4,13:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
qed:14:	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

Theorem

pm2.43bgbi 45500

Logical equivalence of a 2-left-nested implication and a 1-left-nested implicated when two antecedents of the former implication are identical. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
5:3,4:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
6::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
qed:5,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))