![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 408 of 473) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-29860) |
![]() (29861-31383) |
![]() (31384-47242) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | riccrng 40701 | A ring is commutative if and only if an isomorphic ring is commutative. (Contributed by SN, 10-Jan-2025.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ≃𝑟 𝑆 → (𝑅 ∈ CRing ↔ 𝑆 ∈ CRing)) | ||
Theorem | drnginvrn0d 40702 | A multiplicative inverse in a division ring is nonzero. (recne0d 11925 analog). (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝑋) ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | drnginvrld 40703 | Property of the multiplicative inverse in a division ring. (recid2d 11927 analog). (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼‘𝑋) · 𝑋) = 1 ) | ||
Theorem | drnginvrrd 40704 | Property of the multiplicative inverse in a division ring. (recidd 11926 analog). (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · (𝐼‘𝑋)) = 1 ) | ||
Theorem | drngmulcanad 40705 | Cancellation of a nonzero factor on the left for multiplication. (mulcanad 11790 analog). (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) = (𝑍 · 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | drngmulcan2ad 40706 | Cancellation of a nonzero factor on the right for multiplication. (mulcan2ad 11791 analog). (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) = (𝑌 · 𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | drnginvmuld 40707 | Inverse of a nonzero product. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = ((𝐼‘𝑌) · (𝐼‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | flddrngd 40708 | A field is a division ring. (Contributed by SN, 17-Jan-2025.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Field) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) | ||
Theorem | lmodgrpd 40709 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
Theorem | lvecgrp 40710 | A vector space is a group. (Contributed by SN, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LVec → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
Theorem | lveclmodd 40711 | A vector space is a left module. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | ||
Theorem | lvecgrpd 40712 | A vector space is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
Theorem | lvecring 40713 | The scalar component of a vector space is a ring. (Contributed by SN, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LVec → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) | ||
Theorem | lmhmlvec 40714 | The property for modules to be vector spaces is invariant under module isomorphism. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ LVec ↔ 𝑇 ∈ LVec)) | ||
Theorem | frlm0vald 40715 | All coordinates of the zero vector are zero. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0g‘𝐹)‘𝐽) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | frlmsnic 40716* | Given a free module with a singleton as the index set, that is, a free module of one-dimensional vectors, the function that maps each vector to its coordinate is a module isomorphism from that module to its ring of scalars seen as a module. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 18-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod {𝐼}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑊) ↦ (𝑥‘𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐼 ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑊 LMIso (ringLMod‘𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | uvccl 40717 | A unit vector is a vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 unitVec 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑈‘𝐽) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | uvcn0 40718 | A unit vector is nonzero. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 unitVec 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑈‘𝐽) ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | pwselbasr 40719 | The reverse direction of pwselbasb 17370: a function between the index and base set of a structure is an element of the structure power. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑅 ↑s 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | pwsgprod 40720* | Finite products in a power structure are taken componentwise. Compare pwsgsum 19759. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑅 ↑s 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑌) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑌) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐽)) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝑈)) finSupp 1 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 Σg (𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝑈))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (𝑇 Σg (𝑦 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ 𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | mplringd 40721 | The polynomial ring is a ring. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Ring) | ||
Theorem | mplcrngd 40722 | The polynomial ring is a commutative ring. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ CRing) | ||
Theorem | mplsubrgcl 40723 | An element of a polynomial algebra over a subring is an element of the polynomial algebra. (Contributed by SN, 9-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | mhmcompl 40724 | The composition of a monoid homomorphism and a polynomial is a polynomial. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 MndHom 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | rhmmpllem1 40725* | Lemma for rhmmpl 40729. A subproof of psrmulcllem 21355. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑓 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡𝑓 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐷⟶(Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝐷⟶(Base‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝑦 ∘r ≤ 𝑘} ↦ ((𝑋‘𝑥)(.r‘𝑅)(𝑌‘(𝑘 ∘f − 𝑥)))) finSupp (0g‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | rhmmpllem2 40726* | Lemma for rhmmpl 40729. A subproof of psrmulcllem 21355. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑓 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡𝑓 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐷⟶(Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝐷⟶(Base‘𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑅 Σg (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝑦 ∘r ≤ 𝑘} ↦ ((𝑋‘𝑥)(.r‘𝑅)(𝑌‘(𝑘 ∘f − 𝑥))))) ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | mhmcoaddmpl 40727 | Show that the ring homomorphism in rhmmpl 40729 preserves addition. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 MndHom 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ (𝐹 + 𝐺)) = ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ✚ (𝐻 ∘ 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | rhmcomulmpl 40728 | Show that the ring homomorphism in rhmmpl 40729 preserves multiplication. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑄) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑃) & ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∘ (𝐹 · 𝐺)) = ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) ∙ (𝐻 ∘ 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | rhmmpl 40729* | Provide a ring homomorphism between two polynomial algebras over their respective base rings given a ring homomorphism between the two base rings. Compare pwsco2rhm 20173. TODO: Currently mhmvlin 21746 would have to be moved up. Investigate the usefulness of surrounding theorems like mndvcl 21740 and the difference between mhmvlin 21746, ofco 7640, and ofco2 21800. (Contributed by SN, 8-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻 ∘ 𝑝)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑃 RingHom 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | mplascl0 40730 | The zero scalar as a polynomial. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝑂) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | evl0 40731 | The zero polynomial evaluates to zero. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄‘ 0 ) = ((𝐵 ↑m 𝐼) × {𝑂})) | ||
Theorem | evlsval3 40732* | Give a formula for the polynomial evaluation homomorphism. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑆 ↑s (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑇) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑇 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((𝐹‘(𝑝‘𝑏)) · (𝑀 Σg (𝑏 ∘f ↑ 𝐺)))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ ((𝐾 ↑m 𝐼) × {𝑥})) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼) ↦ (𝑎‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 = 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | evlsvval 40733* | Give a formula for the evaluation of a polynomial. (Contributed by SN, 9-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑆 ↑s (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑇) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ ((𝐾 ↑m 𝐼) × {𝑥})) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼) ↦ (𝑎‘𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄‘𝐴) = (𝑇 Σg (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((𝐹‘(𝐴‘𝑏)) · (𝑀 Σg (𝑏 ∘f ↑ 𝐺)))))) | ||
Theorem | evlsscaval 40734 | Polynomial evaluation builder for a scalar. Compare evl1scad 21701. Note that scalar multiplication by 𝑋 is the same as vector multiplication by (𝐴‘𝑋) by asclmul1 21289. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (algSc‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝐴‘𝑋))‘𝐿) = 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | evlsvarval 40735 | Polynomial evaluation builder for a variable. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝐼 mVar 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑉‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑉‘𝑋))‘𝐴) = (𝐴‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | evlsbagval 40736* | Polynomial evaluation builder for a bag of variables. EDITORIAL: This theorem should stay in my mathbox until there's another use, since 0 and 1 using 𝑈 instead of 𝑆 is convenient for its sole use case mhphf 40757, but may not be convenient for other uses. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑆) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑈) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝐵, 1 , 0 )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝐹)‘𝐴) = (𝑀 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝐵‘𝑣) ↑ (𝐴‘𝑣)))))) | ||
Theorem | evlsexpval 40737 | Polynomial evaluation builder for exponentiation. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑀)‘𝐴) = 𝑉)) & ⊢ ∙ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑃)) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁 ∙ 𝑀) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑁 ∙ 𝑀))‘𝐴) = (𝑁 ↑ 𝑉))) | ||
Theorem | evlsaddval 40738 | Polynomial evaluation builder for addition. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑀)‘𝐴) = 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)‘𝐴) = 𝑊)) & ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 ✚ 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑀 ✚ 𝑁))‘𝐴) = (𝑉 + 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | evlsmulval 40739 | Polynomial evaluation builder for multiplication. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑀)‘𝐴) = 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)‘𝐴) = 𝑊)) & ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑃) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 ∙ 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑀 ∙ 𝑁))‘𝐴) = (𝑉 · 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | evlsevl 40740 | Evaluation in a subring is the same as evaluation in the ring itself. (Contributed by SN, 9-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝐼 eval 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄‘𝐹) = (𝑂‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | evladdval 40741 | Polynomial evaluation builder for addition. (Contributed by SN, 9-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑀)‘𝐴) = 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)‘𝐴) = 𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 ✚ 𝑁) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝑄‘(𝑀 ✚ 𝑁))‘𝐴) = (𝑉 + 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | selvcllem1 40742 | 𝑇 is an associative algebra. For simplicity, 𝐼 stands for (𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) and we have 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊 instead of 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼. TODO-SN: In practice, this "simplification" makes the lemmas harder to use. (Contributed by SN, 15-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ AssAlg) | ||
Theorem | selvcllem2 40743 | 𝐷 is a ring homomorphism. (Contributed by SN, 15-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ∘ (algSc‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | selvcllem3 40744 | The third argument passed to evalSub is in the domain. (Contributed by SN, 15-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ∘ (algSc‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐷 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | selvcllemh 40745 | Apply the third argument (selvcllem3 40744) to show that 𝑄 is a (ring) homomorphism. (Contributed by SN, 5-Nov-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ∘ (algSc‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑇)‘ran 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑇 ↾s ran 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑇 ↑s (𝐵 ↑m 𝐼)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑊 RingHom 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | selvcllem4 40746 | The fourth argument passed to evalSub is in the domain (a polynomial in (𝐼 mPoly (𝐽 mPoly ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅)))). (Contributed by SN, 5-Nov-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ∘ (algSc‘𝑈)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑇 ↾s ran 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | selvcllem5 40747* | The fifth argument passed to evalSub is in the domain (a function 𝐼⟶𝐸). (Contributed by SN, 22-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐽, ((𝐽 mVar 𝑈)‘𝑥), (𝐶‘(((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mVar 𝑅)‘𝑥)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | selvcl 40748 | Closure of the "variable selection" function. (Contributed by SN, 22-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | selvval2 40749* | Value of the "variable selection" function. Use evlsevl 40740 for a simpler definition. (Contributed by SN, 9-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (algSc‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 ∘ (algSc‘𝑈)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘𝐹) = (((𝐼 eval 𝑇)‘(𝐷 ∘ 𝐹))‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐽, ((𝐽 mVar 𝑈)‘𝑥), (𝐶‘(((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mVar 𝑅)‘𝑥)))))) | ||
Theorem | selvadd 40750 | The "variable selection" function is additive. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝐼 ∖ 𝐽) mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝐽 mPoly 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑇) & ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ⊆ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘(𝐹 + 𝐺)) = ((((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘𝐹) ✚ (((𝐼 selectVars 𝑅)‘𝐽)‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | fsuppind 40751* | Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support, or in other words the base set of the free module (see frlmelbas 21162 and frlmplusgval 21170). This theorem is structurally general for polynomial proof usage (see mplelbas 21399 and mpladd 21413). Note that hypothesis 0 is redundant when 𝐼 is nonempty. (Contributed by SN, 18-May-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 finSupp 0 )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | fsuppssindlem1 40752* | Lemma for fsuppssind 40754. Functions are zero outside of their support. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑆)‘𝑥), 0 ))) | ||
Theorem | fsuppssindlem2 40753* | Lemma for fsuppssind 40754. Write a function as a union. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑆, (𝑓‘𝑥), 0 )) ∈ 𝐻} ↔ (𝐹:𝑆⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∪ ((𝐼 ∖ 𝑆) × { 0 })) ∈ 𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | fsuppssind 40754* | Induction on functions 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 with finite support (see fsuppind 40751) whose supports are subsets of 𝑆. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝑥 ∘f + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 finSupp 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 supp 0 ) ⊆ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | mhpind 40755* | The homogeneous polynomials of degree 𝑁 are generated by the terms of degree 𝑁 and addition. (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐷 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐺) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑠 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ if(𝑠 = 𝑎, 𝑏, 0 )) ∈ 𝐺) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐻‘𝑁) ∩ 𝐺))) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | mhphflem 40756* | Lemma for mhphf 40757. Add several multiples of 𝐿 together, in a case where the total amount of multiplies is 𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = {ℎ ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝐼) ∣ (◡ℎ “ ℕ) ∈ Fin} & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ ((ℂfld ↾s ℕ0) Σg 𝑔) = 𝑁} & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ · = (.g‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐺 Σg (𝑣 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑣) · 𝐿))) = (𝑁 · 𝐿)) | ||
Theorem | mhphf 40757 | A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function. Equivalently, an algebraic form is a homogeneous function. (An algebraic form is the function corresponding to a homogeneous polynomial, which in this case is the (𝑄‘𝑋) which corresponds to 𝑋). (Contributed by SN, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘((𝐼 × {𝐿}) ∘f · 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | mhphf2 40758 |
A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf 40757
with simpler notation in the conclusion in exchange for a complex
definition of ∙, which is
based on frlmvscafval 21172 but without the
finite support restriction (frlmpws 21156, frlmbas 21161) on the assignments
𝐴 from variables to values.
TODO?: Polynomials (df-mpl 21313) are defined to have a finite amount of terms (of finite degree). As such, any assignment may be replaced by an assignment with finite support (as only a finite amount of variables matter in a given polynomial, even if the set of variables is infinite). So the finite support restriction can be assumed without loss of generality. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘((ringLMod‘𝑆) ↑s 𝐼)) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝐼)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | mhphf3 40759 | A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf2 40758 with the finite support restriction (frlmpws 21156, frlmbas 21161) on the assignments 𝐴 from variables to values. See comment of mhphf2 40758. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑆)‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | mhphf4 40760 | A homogeneous polynomial defines a homogeneous function; this is mhphf3 40759 with evalSub collapsed to eval. (Contributed by SN, 23-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 mHomP 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑆 freeLMod 𝐼) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑆) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘(𝐿 ∙ 𝐴)) = ((𝑁 ↑ 𝐿) · ((𝑄‘𝑋)‘𝐴))) | ||
Towards the start of this section are several proofs regarding the different complex number axioms that could be used to prove some results. For example, ax-1rid 11121 is used in mulid1 11153 related theorems, so one could trade off the extra axioms in mulid1 11153 for the axioms needed to prove that something is a real number. Another example is avoiding complex number closure laws by using real number closure laws and then using ax-resscn 11108; in the other direction, real number closure laws can be avoided by using ax-resscn 11108 and then the complex number closure laws. (This only works if the result of (𝐴 + 𝐵) only needs to be a complex number). The natural numbers are especially amenable to axiom reductions, as the set ℕ is the recursive set {1, (1 + 1), ((1 + 1) + 1)}, etc., i.e. the set of numbers formed by only additions of 1. The digits 2 through 9 are defined so that they expand into additions of 1. This conveniently allows for adding natural numbers by rearranging parentheses, as shown below: (4 + 3) = 7 ((3 + 1) + (2 + 1)) = (6 + 1) ((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + ((1 + 1) + 1)) = ((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) This only requires ax-addass 11116, ax-1cn 11109, and ax-addcl 11111. (And in practice, the expression isn't fully expanded into ones.) Multiplication by 1 requires either mulid2i 11160 or (ax-1rid 11121 and 1re 11155) as seen in 1t1e1 12315 and 1t1e1ALT 40764. Multiplying with greater natural numbers uses ax-distr 11118. Still, this takes fewer axioms than adding zero, which is often implicit in theorems such as (9 + 1) = ;10. Adding zero uses almost every complex number axiom, though notably not ax-mulcom 11115 (see readdid1 40864 and readdid2 40858). | ||
Theorem | c0exALT 40761 | Alternate proof of c0ex 11149 using more set theory axioms but fewer complex number axioms (add ax-10 2137, ax-11 2154, ax-13 2370, ax-nul 5263, and remove ax-1cn 11109, ax-icn 11110, ax-addcl 11111, and ax-mulcl 11113). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | 0cnALT3 40762 | Alternate proof of 0cn 11147 using ax-resscn 11108, ax-addrcl 11112, ax-rnegex 11122, ax-cnre 11124 instead of ax-icn 11110, ax-addcl 11111, ax-mulcl 11113, ax-i2m1 11119. Version of 0cnALT 11389 using ax-1cn 11109 instead of ax-icn 11110. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | elre0re 40763 | Specialized version of 0red 11158 without using ax-1cn 11109 and ax-cnre 11124. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | 1t1e1ALT 40764 | Alternate proof of 1t1e1 12315 using a different set of axioms (add ax-mulrcl 11114, ax-i2m1 11119, ax-1ne0 11120, ax-rrecex 11123 and remove ax-resscn 11108, ax-mulcom 11115, ax-mulass 11117, ax-distr 11118). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (1 · 1) = 1 | ||
Theorem | remulcan2d 40765 | mulcan2d 11789 for real numbers using fewer axioms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | readdid1addid2d 40766 | Given some real number 𝐵 where 𝐴 acts like a right additive identity, derive that 𝐴 is a left additive identity. Note that the hypothesis is weaker than proving that 𝐴 is a right additive identity (for all numbers). Although, if there is a right additive identity, then by readdcan 11329, 𝐴 is the right additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sn-1ne2 40767 | A proof of 1ne2 12361 without using ax-mulcom 11115, ax-mulass 11117, ax-pre-mulgt0 11128. Based on mul02lem2 11332. (Contributed by SN, 13-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ 1 ≠ 2 | ||
Theorem | nnn1suc 40768* | A positive integer that is not 1 is a successor of some other positive integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝑥 + 1) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nnadd1com 40769 | Addition with 1 is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) = (1 + 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | nnaddcom 40770 | Addition is commutative for natural numbers. Uses fewer axioms than addcom 11341. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | nnaddcomli 40771 | Version of addcomli 11347 for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶 | ||
Theorem | nnadddir 40772 | Right-distributivity for natural numbers without ax-mulcom 11115. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | nnmul1com 40773 | Multiplication with 1 is commutative for natural numbers, without ax-mulcom 11115. Since (𝐴 · 1) is 𝐴 by ax-1rid 11121, this is equivalent to remulid2 40888 for natural numbers, but using fewer axioms (avoiding ax-resscn 11108, ax-addass 11116, ax-mulass 11117, ax-rnegex 11122, ax-pre-lttri 11125, ax-pre-lttrn 11126, ax-pre-ltadd 11127). (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 · 𝐴) = (𝐴 · 1)) | ||
Theorem | nnmulcom 40774 | Multiplication is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mvrrsubd 40775 | Move a subtraction in the RHS to a right-addition in the LHS. Converse of mvlraddd 11565. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | laddrotrd 40776 | Rotate the variables right in an equation with addition on the left, converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvlladdd 11566 with a commuted consequent, and of mvrladdd 11568 with a commuted hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | raddcom12d 40777 | Swap the first two variables in an equation with addition on the right, converting it into a subtraction. Version of mvrraddd 11567 with a commuted consequent, and of mvlraddd 11565 with a commuted hypothesis. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lsubrotld 40778 | Rotate the variables left in an equation with subtraction on the left, converting it into an addition. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsubcom23d 40779 | Swap the second and third variables in an equation with subtraction on the left, converting it into an addition. (Contributed by SN, 23-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | addsubeq4com 40780 | Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | sqsumi 40781 | A sum squared. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | negn0nposznnd 40782 | Lemma for dffltz 40958. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 0 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | sqmid3api 40783 | Value of the square of the middle term of a 3-term arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝑁) = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝑁) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝑁 · 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | decaddcom 40784 | Commute ones place in addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 + 𝐶) = (;𝐴𝐶 + 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sqn5i 40785 | The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;(𝐴 · (𝐴 + 1))25 | ||
Theorem | sqn5ii 40786 | The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;𝐶25 | ||
Theorem | decpmulnc 40787 | Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication, no carry. Compare muladdi 11606. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;;𝐸𝐹𝐺 | ||
Theorem | decpmul 40788 | Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸 & ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹 & ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = ;𝐺𝐻 & ⊢ (;𝐸𝐺 + 𝐹) = 𝐼 & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;𝐼𝐻 | ||
Theorem | sqdeccom12 40789 | The square of a number in terms of its digits switched. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ⇒ ⊢ ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (;𝐵𝐴 · ;𝐵𝐴)) = (;99 · ((𝐴 · 𝐴) − (𝐵 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | sq3deccom12 40790 | Variant of sqdeccom12 40789 with a three digit square. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ ((;;𝐴𝐵𝐶 · ;;𝐴𝐵𝐶) − (;𝐷𝐵 · ;𝐷𝐵)) = (;99 · ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (𝐶 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | 235t711 40791 |
Calculate a product by long multiplication as a base comparison with other
multiplication algorithms.
Conveniently, 711 has two ones which greatly simplifies calculations like 235 · 1. There isn't a higher level mulcomli 11164 saving the lower level uses of mulcomli 11164 within 235 · 7 since mulcom2 doesn't exist, but if commuted versions of theorems like 7t2e14 12727 are added then this proof would benefit more than ex-decpmul 40792. For practicality, this proof doesn't have "e167085" at the end of its name like 2p2e4 12288 or 8t7e56 12738. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085 | ||
Theorem | ex-decpmul 40792 | Example usage of decpmul 40788. This proof is significantly longer than 235t711 40791. There is more unnecessary carrying compared to 235t711 40791. Although saving 5 visual steps, using mulcomli 11164 early on increases the compressed proof length. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085 | ||
Theorem | oexpreposd 40793 | Lemma for dffltz 40958. TODO-SN?: This can be used to show exp11d 40797 holds for all integers when the exponent is odd. The more standard ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀 should be used. (Contributed by SN, 4-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑀 / 2) ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < 𝑁 ↔ 0 < (𝑁↑𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | ltexp1d 40794 | ltmul1d 12998 for exponentiation of positive reals. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | ltexp1dd 40795 | Raising both sides of 'less than' to the same positive integer preserves ordering. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 24-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | exp11nnd 40796 | sq11d 14161 for positive real bases and positive integer exponents. The base cannot be generalized much further, since if 𝑁 is even then we have 𝐴↑𝑁 = -𝐴↑𝑁. (Contributed by SN, 14-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) = (𝐵↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | exp11d 40797 | exp11nnd 40796 for nonzero integer exponents. (Contributed by SN, 14-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) = (𝐵↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 0dvds0 40798 | 0 divides 0. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 0 ∥ 0 | ||
Theorem | absdvdsabsb 40799 | Divisibility is invariant under taking the absolute value on both sides. (Contributed by SN, 15-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (abs‘𝑀) ∥ (abs‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | dvdsexpim 40800 | dvdssqim 16435 generalized to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 2-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |