P. 409 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40801-40900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mzpcong 40801*	Polynomials commute with congruences. (Does this characterize them?) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 𝑁 ∥ ((𝑋‘𝑘) − (𝑌‘𝑘)))) → 𝑁 ∥ ((𝐹‘𝑋) − (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	congrep 40802*	Every integer is congruent to some number in the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...(𝐴 − 1))𝐴 ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁))
Theorem	congabseq 40803	If two integers are congruent, they are either equal or separated by at least the congruence base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) → ((abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
20.29.30  Alternating congruential equations
Theorem	acongid 40804	A wff like that in this theorem will be known as an "alternating congruence". A special symbol might be considered if more uses come up. They have many of the same properties as normal congruences, starting with reflexivity. JonesMatijasevic uses "a ≡ ± b (mod c)" for this construction. The disjunction of divisibility constraints seems to adequately capture the concept, but it's rather verbose and somewhat inelegant. Use of an explicit equivalence relation might also work. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐵)))
Theorem	acongsym 40805	Symmetry of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵)))
Theorem	acongneg2 40806	Negate right side of alternating congruence. Makes essential use of the "alternating" part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − --𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))
Theorem	acongtr 40807	Transitivity of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷)))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)))
Theorem	acongeq12d 40808	Substitution deduction for alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐸))))
Theorem	acongrep 40809*	Every integer is alternating-congruent to some number in the first half of the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...𝐴)((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − -𝑁)))
Theorem	fzmaxdif 40810	Bound on the difference between two integers constrained to two possibly overlapping finite ranges. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐸...𝐹)) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵)) → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐷)) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵))
Theorem	fzneg 40811	Reflection of a finite range of integers about 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶) ↔ -𝐴 ∈ (-𝐶...-𝐵)))
Theorem	acongeq 40812	Two numbers in the fundamental domain are alternating-congruent iff they are equal. TODO: could be used to shorten jm2.26 40831. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0...𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))))
Theorem	dvdsacongtr 40813	Alternating congruence passes from a base to a dividing base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))) → (𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))
20.29.31  Additional theorems on integer divisibility
Theorem	coprmdvdsb 40814	Multiplication by a coprime number does not affect divisibility. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1)) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	modabsdifz 40815	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → ((𝑁 − (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀))) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	dvdsabsmod0 40816	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀)) = 0))
20.29.32  X and Y sequences 3: Divisibility properties
Theorem	jm2.18 40817	Theorem 2.18 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Direct relationship of the exponential function to X and Y sequences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∥ (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) − (𝐾↑𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.19lem1 40818	Lemma for jm2.19 40822. X and Y values are coprime. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) gcd (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) = 1)
Theorem	jm2.19lem2 40819	Lemma for jm2.19 40822. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem3 40820	Lemma for jm2.19 40822. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem4 40821	Lemma for jm2.19 40822. Extend to ZZ by symmetry. TODO: use zindbi 40775. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19 40822	Lemma 2.19 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Transfer divisibility constraints between Y-values and their indices. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.21 40823	Lemma for jm2.20nn 40826. Express X and Y values as a binomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)))) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))↑𝐽))
Theorem	jm2.22 40824*	Lemma for jm2.20nn 40826. Applying binomial theorem and taking irrational part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐽) ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑥} ((𝐽C𝑖) · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 𝑖)) · (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑𝑖) · (((𝐴↑2) − 1)↑((𝑖 − 1) / 2))))))
Theorem	jm2.23 40825	Lemma for jm2.20nn 40826. Truncate binomial expansion p-adicly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑3) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) − (𝐽 · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))))
Theorem	jm2.20nn 40826	Lemma 2.20 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, the "first step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑2) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	jm2.25lem1 40827	Lemma for jm2.26 40831. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷))) → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − -𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵))))
Theorem	jm2.25 40828	Lemma for jm2.26 40831. Remainders mod X(2n) are negaperiodic mod 2n. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.26a 40829	Lemma for jm2.26 40831. Reverse direction is required to prove forward direction, so do it separately. Induction on difference between K and M, together with the addition formula fact that adding 2N only inverts sign. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀)) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.26lem3 40830	Lemma for jm2.26 40831. Use acongrep 40809 to find K', M' ~ K, M in [ 0,N ]. Thus Y(K') ~ Y(M') and both are small; K' = M' on pain of contradicting 2.24, so K ~ M. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)
Theorem	jm2.26 40831	Lemma 2.26 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697, the "second step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))) ↔ ((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.15nn0 40832	Lemma 2.15 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. Yrm is a polynomial for fixed N, so has the expected congruence property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − (𝐵 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.16nn0 40833	Lemma 2.16 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. This may be regarded as a special case of jm2.15nn0 40832 if Yrm is redefined as described in rmyluc 40766. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 1) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − 𝑁))
20.29.33  X and Y sequences 4: Diophantine representability of Y
Theorem	jm2.27a 40834	Lemma for jm2.27 40837. Reverse direction after existential quantifiers are expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27b 40835	Lemma for jm2.27 40837. Expand existential quantifiers for reverse direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27c 40836	Lemma for jm2.27 40837. Forward direction with substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐵 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐴 + ((𝐹↑2) · ((𝐹↑2) − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = ((𝐸 / (2 · (𝐶↑2))) − 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (((((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))))))
Theorem	jm2.27 40837*	Lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697; rmY is a diophantine relation. 0 was excluded from the range of B and the lower limit of G was imposed because the source proof does not seem to work otherwise; quite possible I'm just missing something. The source proof uses both i and I; i has been changed to j to avoid collision. This theorem is basically nothing but substitution instances, all the work is done in jm2.27a 40834 and jm2.27c 40836. Once Diophantine relations have been defined, the content of the theorem is "rmY is Diophantine". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ0 ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (((((𝑑↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝑓↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑒↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝑖↑2) − (((𝑔↑2) − 1) · (ℎ↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑒 = ((𝑗 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (𝑔 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝑔 − 1) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (ℎ − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (ℎ − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)))))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem1 40838*	Lemma for rmydioph 40843. Substitution of a tuple restriction into a projection that doesn't care. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ (1...𝐵)) → (𝑎‘𝐴) = (𝑏‘𝐴))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem2 40839	Lemma for rmydioph 40843. This theorem is used along with the next three to efficiently infer steps like 7 ∈ (1...;10). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐵 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐶)
Theorem	jm2.27dlem3 40840	Lemma for rmydioph 40843. Infer membership of the endpoint of a range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐴)
Theorem	jm2.27dlem4 40841	Lemma for rmydioph 40843. Infer ℕ-hood of large numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	jm2.27dlem5 40842	Lemma for rmydioph 40843. Used with sselii 3919 to infer membership of midpoints of range; jm2.27dlem2 40839 is deprecated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1)    &   ⊢ (1...𝐵) ⊆ (1...𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (1...𝐴) ⊆ (1...𝐶)
Theorem	rmydioph 40843	jm2.27 40837 restated in terms of Diophantine sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Yrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
20.29.34  X and Y sequences 5: Diophantine representability of X, ^, _C
Theorem	rmxdiophlem 40844*	X can be expressed in terms of Y, so it is also Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑋 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑦↑2))) = 1)))
Theorem	rmxdioph 40845	X is a Diophantine function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Xrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
Theorem	jm3.1lem1 40846	Lemma for jm3.1 40849. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < 𝐴)
Theorem	jm3.1lem2 40847	Lemma for jm3.1 40849. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1))
Theorem	jm3.1lem3 40848	Lemma for jm3.1 40849. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	jm3.1 40849	Diophantine expression for exponentiation. Lemma 3.1 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 698. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐾↑𝑁) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) mod ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1)))
Theorem	expdiophlem1 40850*	Lemma for expdioph 40852. Fully expanded expression for exponential. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝐴↑𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑑 = (𝐴 Yrm (𝐵 + 1))) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑑 Yrm 𝐵)) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑓 = (𝑑 Xrm 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐶 < ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∧ ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∥ ((𝑓 − ((𝑑 − 𝐴) · 𝑒)) − 𝐶))))))))
Theorem	expdiophlem2 40851	Lemma for expdioph 40852. Exponentiation on a restricted domain is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘2) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
Theorem	expdioph 40852	The exponential function is Diophantine. This result completes and encapsulates our development using Pell equation solution sequences and is sometimes regarded as Matiyasevich's theorem properly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
20.29.35  Uncategorized stuff not associated with a major project
Theorem	setindtr 40853*	Set induction for sets contained in a transitive set. If we are allowed to assume Infinity, then all sets have a transitive closure and this reduces to setind 9501; however, this version is useful without Infinity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦(Tr 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	setindtrs 40854*	Set induction scheme without Infinity. See comments at setindtr 40853. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑧(Tr 𝑧 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝜒)
Theorem	dford3lem1 40855*	Lemma for dford3 40857. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑦) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 (Tr 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 Tr 𝑦))
Theorem	dford3lem2 40856*	Lemma for dford3 40857. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ On)
Theorem	dford3 40857*	Ordinals are precisely the hereditarily transitive classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ (Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑥))
Theorem	dford4 40858*	dford3 40857 expressed in primitives to demonstrate shortness. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏∀𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑎) → (𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎))))
Theorem	wopprc 40859	Unrelated: Wiener pairs treat proper classes symmetrically. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ ¬ 1o ∈ {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}})
Theorem	rpnnen3lem 40860*	Lemma for rpnnen3 40861. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑎 < 𝑏) → {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑎} ≠ {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑏})
Theorem	rpnnen3 40861	Dedekind cut injection of ℝ into 𝒫 ℚ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ℝ ≼ 𝒫 ℚ
20.29.36  More equivalents of the Axiom of Choice
Theorem	axac10 40862	Characterization of choice similar to dffin1-5 10153. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ( ≈ “ On) = V
Theorem	harinf 40863	The Hartogs number of an infinite set is at least ω. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ω ⊆ (har‘𝑆))
Theorem	wdom2d2 40864*	Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	ttac 40865	Tarski's theorem about choice: infxpidm 10327 is equivalent to ax-ac 10224. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑐(ω ≼ 𝑐 → (𝑐 × 𝑐) ≈ 𝑐))
Theorem	pw2f1ocnv 40866*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 8875, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦, 1o, ∅)))))
Theorem	pw2f1o2 40867*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 8875, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2f1o2val 40868*	Function value of the pw2f1o2 40867 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (◡𝑋 “ {1o}))
Theorem	pw2f1o2val2 40869*	Membership in a mapped set under the pw2f1o2 40867 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑋‘𝑌) = 1o))
Theorem	soeq12d 40870	Equality deduction for total orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
Theorem	freq12d 40871	Equality deduction for founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵))
Theorem	weeq12d 40872	Equality deduction for well-orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
Theorem	limsuc2 40873	Limit ordinals in the sense inclusive of zero contain all successors of their members. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwsolem 40874*	Transfer an ordering on characteristic functions by isomorphism to the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐹 Isom 𝑈, 𝑇 ((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwso 40875*	A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch1 40876*	Define an enumeration of a set from a choice function; second part, it restricts to a bijection. EDITORIAL: overlaps dfac8a 9795. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch2 40877*	Define an enumeration (weak dominance version) of a set from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dnnumch3lem 40878*	Value of the ordinal injection function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}))‘𝑤) = ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤}))
Theorem	dnnumch3 40879*	Define an injection from a set into the ordinals using a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥})):𝐴–1-1→On)
Theorem	dnwech 40880*	Define a well-ordering from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑣}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤})}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 We 𝐴)
Theorem	fnwe2val 40881*	Lemma for fnwe2 40885. Substitute variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑏) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆𝑏)))
Theorem	fnwe2lem1 40882*	Lemma for fnwe2 40885. Substitution in well-ordering hypothesis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑎)})
Theorem	fnwe2lem2 40883*	Lemma for fnwe2 40885. An element which is in a minimal fiber and minimal within its fiber is minimal globally; thus 𝑇 is well-founded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑇𝑏)
Theorem	fnwe2lem3 40884*	Lemma for fnwe2 40885. Trichotomy. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏 ∨ 𝑏𝑇𝑎))
Theorem	fnwe2 40885*	A well-ordering can be constructed on a partitioned set by patching together well-orderings on each partition using a well-ordering on the partitions themselves. Similar to fnwe 7982 but does not require the within-partition ordering to be globally well. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴)
Theorem	aomclem1 40886*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. This is the beginning of the proof that multiple choice is equivalent to choice. Our goal is to construct, by transfinite recursion, a well-ordering of (𝑅1‘𝐴). In what follows, 𝐴 is the index of the rank we wish to well-order, 𝑧 is the collection of well-orderings constructed so far, dom 𝑧 is the set of ordinal indices of constructed ranks i.e. the next rank to construct, and 𝑦 is a postulated multiple-choice function. Successor case 1, define a simple ordering from the well-ordered predecessor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 Or (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem2 40887*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Successor case 2, a choice function for subsets of (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑎))
Theorem	aomclem3 40888*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Successor case 3, our required well-ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem4 40889*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Limit case. Patch together well-orderings constructed so far using fnwe2 40885 to cover the limit rank. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem5 40890*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Combine the successor case with the limit case. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem6 40891*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Transfinite induction, close over 𝑧. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝐴) We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem7 40892*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. (𝑅1‘𝐴) is well-orderable. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem8 40893*	Lemma for dfac11 40894. Perform variable substitutions. This is the most we can say without invoking regularity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	dfac11 40894*	The right-hand side of this theorem (compare with ac4 10240), sometimes known as the "axiom of multiple choice", is a choice equivalent. Curiously, this statement cannot be proved without ax-reg 9360, despite not mentioning the cumulative hierarchy in any way as most consequences of regularity do. This is definition (MC) of [Schechter] p. 141. EDITORIAL: the proof is not original with me of course but I lost my reference sometime after writing it. A multiple choice function allows any total order to be extended to a choice function, which in turn defines a well-ordering. Since a well-ordering on a set defines a simple ordering of the power set, this allows the trivial well-ordering of the empty set to be transfinitely bootstrapped up the cumulative hierarchy to any desired level. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑧 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))
Theorem	kelac1 40895*	Kelley's choice, basic form: if a collection of sets can be cast as closed sets in the factors of a topology, and there is a definable element in each topology (which need not be in the closed set - if it were this would be trivial), then compactness (via finite intersection) guarantees that the final product is nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑈 ∈ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽)) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	kelac2lem 40896	Lemma for kelac2 40897 and dfac21 40898: knob topologies are compact. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}) ∈ Comp)
Theorem	kelac2 40897*	Kelley's choice, most common form: compactness of a product of knob topologies recovers choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}))) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dfac21 40898	Tychonoff's theorem is a choice equivalent. Definition AC21 of Schechter p. 461. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑓⟶Comp → (∏t‘𝑓) ∈ Comp))
20.29.37  Finitely generated left modules
Syntax	clfig 40899	Extend class notation with the class of finitely generated left modules.
class LFinGen
Definition	df-lfig 40900	Define the class of finitely generated left modules. Finite generation of subspaces can be intepreted using ↾s. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ LFinGen = {𝑤 ∈ LMod ∣ (Base‘𝑤) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝑤) “ (𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∩ Fin))}