P. 409 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40801-40900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	isline3 40801*	Definition of line in terms of original lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞))))
Theorem	isline4N 40802*	Definition of line in terms of original lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	lneq2at 40803	A line equals the join of any two of its distinct points (atoms). (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑋 = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	lnatexN 40804*	There is an atom in a line different from any other. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	lnjatN 40805*	Given an atom in a line, there is another atom which when joined equals the line. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)))
Theorem	lncvrelatN 40806	A lattice element covered by a line is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃𝐶𝑋)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lncvrat 40807	A line covers the atoms it contains. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	lncmp 40808	If two lines are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑀‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	2lnat 40809	Two intersecting lines intersect at an atom. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2atm2atN 40810	Two joins with a common atom have a nonzero meet. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	2llnma1b 40811	Generalization of 2llnma1 40812. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑃)
Theorem	2llnma1 40812	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑄)
Theorem	2llnma3r 40813	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2 40814	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2rN 40815	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
21.29.13  Construction of a vector space from a Hilbert lattice
Theorem	cdlema1N 40816	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdlema2N 40817	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑅 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	cdlemblem 40818	Lemma for cdlemb 40819. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 < 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢)))) → (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemb 40819*	Given two atoms not less than or equal to an element covered by 1, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Syntax	cpadd 40820	Extend class notation with projective subspace sum.
class +𝑃
Definition	df-padd 40821*	Define projective sum of two subspaces (or more generally two sets of atoms), which is the union of all lines generated by pairs of atoms from each subspace. Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. For convenience, our definition is generalized to apply to empty sets. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ +𝑃 = (𝑙 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙), 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙) ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑙) ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝(le‘𝑙)(𝑞(join‘𝑙)𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddfval 40822*	Projective subspace sum operation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → + = (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴, 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddval 40823*	Projective subspace sum operation value. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)}))
Theorem	elpadd 40824*	Member of a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)))))
Theorem	elpaddn0 40825*	Member of projective subspace sum of nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	paddvaln0N 40826*	Projective subspace sum operation value for nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})
Theorem	elpaddri 40827	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpaddatriN 40828	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))
Theorem	elpaddat 40829*	Membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	elpaddatiN 40830*	Consequence of membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑅 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	elpadd2at 40831	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	elpadd2at2 40832	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	paddunssN 40833	Projective subspace sum includes the set union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpadd0 40834	Member of projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddval0 40835	Projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌))
Theorem	padd01 40836	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + ∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	padd02 40837	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddcom 40838	Projective subspace sum commutes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddssat 40839	A projective subspace sum is a set of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	sspadd1 40840	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its first summand. (ssun1 4124 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	sspadd2 40841	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its second summand. (ssun2 4125 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddss1 40842	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss1 4131 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss2 40843	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss2 4133 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑍 + 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddss12 40844	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss12 4134 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝑊) → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddasslem1 40845	Lemma for paddass 40863. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem2 40846	Lemma for paddass 40863. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem3 40847*	Lemma for paddass 40863. Restate projective space axiom ps-2 40503. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))))
Theorem	paddasslem4 40848*	Lemma for paddass 40863. Combine paddasslem1 40845, paddasslem2 40846, and paddasslem3 40847. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))
Theorem	paddasslem5 40849	Lemma for paddass 40863. Show 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 by contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) → 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧)
Theorem	paddasslem6 40850	Lemma for paddass 40863. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem7 40851	Lemma for paddass 40863. Combine paddasslem5 40849 and paddasslem6 40850. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem8 40852	Lemma for paddass 40863. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem9 40853	Lemma for paddass 40863. Combine paddasslem7 40851 and paddasslem8 40852. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem10 40854	Lemma for paddass 40863. Use paddasslem4 40848 to eliminate 𝑠 from paddasslem9 40853. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem11 40855	Lemma for paddass 40863. The case when 𝑝 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem12 40856	Lemma for paddass 40863. The case when 𝑥 = 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem13 40857	Lemma for paddass 40863. The case when 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦). (Unlike the proof in Maeda and Maeda, we don't need 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem14 40858	Lemma for paddass 40863. Remove 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧, 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, and ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) from antecedent of paddasslem10 40854, using paddasslem11 40855, paddasslem12 40856, and paddasslem13 40857. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem15 40859	Lemma for paddass 40863. Use elpaddn0 40825 to eliminate 𝑦 and 𝑧 from paddasslem14 40858. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅)) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem16 40860	Lemma for paddass 40863. Use elpaddn0 40825 to eliminate 𝑥 and 𝑟 from paddasslem15 40859. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem17 40861	Lemma for paddass 40863. The case when at least one sum argument is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem18 40862	Lemma for paddass 40863. Combine paddasslem16 40860 and paddasslem17 40861. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddass 40863	Projective subspace sum is associative. Equation 16.2.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. In our version, the subspaces do not have to be nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd12N 40864	Commutative/associative law for projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) = (𝑌 + (𝑋 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd4N 40865	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddidm 40866	Projective subspace sum is idempotent. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddclN 40867	The projective sum of two subspaces is a subspace. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	paddssw1 40868	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddssw2 40869	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss 40870	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss 4136 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍))
Theorem	pmodlem1 40871*	Lemma for pmod1i 40873. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodlem2 40872	Lemma for pmod1i 40873. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmod1i 40873	The modular law holds in a projective subspace. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmod2iN 40874	Dual of the modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑍 ⊆ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmodN 40875	The modular law for projective subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍))) = ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodl42N 40876	Lemma derived from modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑆)) → (((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) ∩ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + ((𝑋 + 𝑍) ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑊))))
Theorem	pmapjoin 40877	The projective map of the join of two lattice elements. Part of Equation 15.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑌)) ⊆ (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	pmapjat1 40878	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑄)))
Theorem	pmapjat2 40879	The projective map of the join of an atom with a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑄) + (𝑀‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pmapjlln1 40880	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 of two atoms). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	hlmod1i 40881	A version of the modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))))
Theorem	atmod1i1 40882	Version of modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod1i1m 40883	Version of modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when an element meets an atom. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ≤ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	atmod1i2 40884	Version of modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnmod1i2 40885	Version of modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod2i1 40886	Version of modular law pmod2iN 40874 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod2i2 40887	Version of modular law pmod2iN 40874 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	llnmod2i2 40888	Version of modular law pmod1i 40873 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i1 40889	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i2 40890	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑃)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod4i1 40891	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod4i2 40892	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑃 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑋) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnexchb2lem 40893	Lemma for llnexchb2 40894. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	llnexchb2 40894	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexchb2 40360 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	llnexch2N 40895	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexch2 40362 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	dalawlem1 40896	Lemma for dalaw 40911. Special case of dath2 40762, where 𝐶 is replaced by ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)). The remaining lemmas will eliminate the conditions on the atoms imposed by dath2 40762. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem2 40897	Lemma for dalaw 40911. Utility lemma that breaks ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) into a join of two pieces. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ ((((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ∨ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇)))
Theorem	dalawlem3 40898	Lemma for dalaw 40911. First piece of dalawlem5 40900. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem4 40899	Lemma for dalaw 40911. Second piece of dalawlem5 40900. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem5 40900	Lemma for dalaw 40911. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) in dalawlem1 40896. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))