Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 423 of 464) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29181) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29182-30704) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30705-46395) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | e01an 42201 | Conjunction form of e01 42200. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | ee01an 42202 | e01an 42201 without virtual deductions. sylancr 586 is also a form of e01an 42201 without virtual deduction, except the order of the hypotheses is different. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | e10 42203 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see mpisyl 21). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | e10an 42204 | Conjunction form of e10 42203. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | ee10an 42205 | e10an 42204 without virtual deductions. sylancl 585 is also e10an 42204 without virtual deductions, except the order of the hypotheses is different. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | e02 42206 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e02an 42207 | Conjunction form of e02 42206. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | ee02an 42208 | e02an 42207 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | eel021old 42209 | el021old 42210 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | el021old 42210 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | eel132 42211 | syl2an 595 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 26-Aug-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | eel000cT 42212 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | eel0TT 42213 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
Theorem | eelT00 42214 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
Theorem | eelTTT 42215 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
Theorem | eelT11 42216 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | eelT1 42217 | Syllogism inference combined with modus ponens. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 23-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | eelT12 42218 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | eelTT1 42219 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | eelT01 42220 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | eel0T1 42221 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | eel12131 42222 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜁) | ||
Theorem | eel2131 42223 | syl2an 595 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 26-Aug-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | eel3132 42224 | syl2an 595 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | eel0321old 42225 | el0321old 42226 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | el0321old 42226 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | eel2122old 42227 | el2122old 42228 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | el2122old 42228 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | eel0000 42229 | Elimination rule similar to mp4an 689, except with a left-nested conjunction unification theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜏 | ||
Theorem | eel00001 42230 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜁) | ||
Theorem | eel00000 42231 | Elimination rule similar eel0000 42229, except with five hpothesis steps. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜂 | ||
Theorem | eel11111 42232 | Five-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl113anc 1380 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) | ||
Theorem | e12 42233 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see sylsyld 61). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e12an 42234 | Conjunction form of e12 42233 (see syl6an 680). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | el12 42235 | Virtual deduction form of syl2an 595. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜏 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜏 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | e20 42236 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6mpi 67). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e20an 42237 | Conjunction form of e20 42236. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | ee20an 42238 | e20an 42237 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | e21 42239 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6ci 71). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e21an 42240 | Conjunction form of e21 42239. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | ee21an 42241 | e21an 42240 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | e333 42242 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | e33 42243 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e33an 42244 | Conjunction form of e33 42243. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee33an 42245 | e33an 42244 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e3 42246 | Meta-connective form of syl8 76. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e3bi 42247 | Biconditional form of e3 42246. syl8ib 255 is e3bi 42247 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e3bir 42248 | Right biconditional form of e3 42246. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e03 42249 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee03 42250 | e03 42249 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e03an 42251 | Conjunction form of e03 42249. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee03an 42252 | Conjunction form of ee03 42250. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e30 42253 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee30 42254 | e30 42253 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e30an 42255 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee30an 42256 | Conjunction form of ee30 42254. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e13 42257 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e13an 42258 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee13an 42259 | e13an 42258 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e31 42260 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee31 42261 | e31 42260 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e31an 42262 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee31an 42263 | e31an 42262 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e23 42264 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl10 79). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e23an 42265 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee23an 42266 | e23an 42265 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e32 42267 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee32 42268 | e32 42267 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e32an 42269 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee32an 42270 | e33an 42244 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
Theorem | e123 42271 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | ee123 42272 | e123 42271 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) | ||
Theorem | el123 42273 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ) ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | e233 42274 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | e323 42275 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | e000 42276 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. The non-virtual deduction form of e000 42276 is the virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
Theorem | e00 42277 | Elimination rule identical to mp2 9. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2 9. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | e00an 42278 | Elimination rule identical to mp2an 688. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2an 688. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | eel00cT 42279 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | eelTT 42280 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | e0a 42281 | Elimination rule identical to ax-mp 5. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
Theorem | eelT 42282 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
Theorem | eel0cT 42283 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | eelT0 42284 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | e0bi 42285 | Elimination rule identical to mpbi 229. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbi 229. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
Theorem | e0bir 42286 | Elimination rule identical to mpbir 230. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbir 230. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
Theorem | uun0.1 42287 | Convention notation form of un0.1 42288. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | un0.1 42288 | ⊤ is the constant true, a tautology (see df-tru 1542). Kleene's "empty conjunction" is logically equivalent to ⊤. In a virtual deduction we shall interpret ⊤ to be the empty wff or the empty collection of virtual hypotheses. ⊤ in a virtual deduction translated into conventional notation we shall interpret to be Kleene's empty conjunction. If 𝜃 is true given the empty collection of virtual hypotheses and another collection of virtual hypotheses, then it is true given only the other collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ⊤ ▶ 𝜑 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | uunT1 42289 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) Proof was revised to accommodate a possible future version of df-tru 1542. (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 8-May-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | uunT1p1 42290 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | uunT21 42291 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | uun121 42292 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | uun121p1 42293 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | uun132 42294 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | uun132p1 42295 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | anabss7p1 42296 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. This would have been named uun221 if the 0th permutation did not exist in set.mm as anabss7 669. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | un10 42297 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , ⊤ ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | un01 42298 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜑 ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | un2122 42299 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | uun2131 42300 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |