| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 293 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31307) |
(31308-32830) |
(32831-50693) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | isleag 29201* | Geometrical "less than" property for angles. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑥”〉))) | ||
| Theorem | isleagd 29202 | Sufficient condition for "less than" angle relation, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑋”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ≤ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
| Theorem | leagne1 29203 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | leagne2 29204 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | leagne3 29205 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | leagne4 29206 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | cgrg3col4 29207* | Lemma 11.28 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. Extend a congruence of three points with a fourth colinear point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝑋”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹𝑦”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsas1 29208 | First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then third sides are equal in length. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | tgsas 29209 | First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsas2 29210 | First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsas3 29211 | First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgasa1 29212 | Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | tgasa 29213 | Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsss1 29214 | Third congruence theorem: SSS (Side-Side-Side): If the three pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsss2 29215 | Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) | ||
| Theorem | tgsss3 29216 | Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉) | ||
| Theorem | dfcgrg2 29217 | Congruence for two triangles can also be defined as congruence of sides and angles (6 parts). This is often the actual textbook definition of triangle congruence, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#Congruence_of_triangles. With this definition, the "SSS" congruence theorem has an additional part, namely, that triangle congruence implies congruence of the sides (which means equality of the lengths). Because our development of elementary geometry strives to closely follow Schwabhaeuser's, our original definition of shape congruence, df-cgrg 28817, already covers that part: see trgcgr 28822. This theorem is also named "CPCTC", which stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#CPCTC 28822. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ∧ (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉)))) | ||
| Theorem | isoas 29218 | Congruence theorem for isocele triangles: if two angles of a triangle are congruent, then the corresponding sides also are. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐶𝐵”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Syntax | ceqlg 29219 | Declare the class of equilateral triangles. |
| class eqltrG | ||
| Definition | df-eqlg 29220* | Define the class of equilateral triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ eqltrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∣ 𝑥(cgrG‘𝑔)〈“(𝑥‘1)(𝑥‘2)(𝑥‘0)”〉}) | ||
| Theorem | iseqlg 29221 | Property of a triangle being equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺) ↔ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉)) | ||
| Theorem | iseqlgd 29222 | Condition for a triangle to be equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐶 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺)) | ||
| Syntax | cprlng 29223 | Extend class notation for the parallel lines relation. |
| class parlnG | ||
| Definition | df-prlng 29224* | Define the parallel relation for lines. Definition 12.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 121. Note that the textbook first defines a "strict" parallelism where equal lines are not considered parallel in the strict sense: here we jump directly to the more common definition which allows equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ parlnG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑏 ∨ (∃ℎ ∈ ran (hlG‘𝑔)(𝑎 ⊆ ℎ ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ ℎ) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏) = ∅)))}) | ||
| Theorem | brprlng 29225* | Property of two lines 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be parallel. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) ∧ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ (∃ℎ ∈ ran 𝐸(𝐴 ⊆ ℎ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℎ) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅))))) | ||
| Theorem | prlngd 29226 | Deduce parallelism between two lines 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | prlngref 29227 | Parallelism is reflexive. Theorem 12.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | prlngsym 29228 | Parallelism is symmetric. Theorem 12.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∥ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | prlngrcl1 29229 | Reverse closure for parallelism. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | prlngrcl2 29230 | Reverse closure for parallelism. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) | ||
| Theorem | prlngin0 29231 | Two parallel lines do not intersect. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | prlngpln 29232* | Two parallel lines are on a common plane. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ∈ ran 𝐸(𝐴 ⊆ ℎ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | prlnghpg 29233 | If two lines 𝐴 and 𝐵 are parallel, then any two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 of 𝐵 lie on the same half-plane limited by 𝐴. Theorem 12.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐴)𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | dfprlng2 29234 | Alternate definition of (strict) parallelism. Theorem 12.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑍})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ≠ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊) ↔ (𝑍((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝑋𝐿𝑌))𝑊 ∧ ((𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∩ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | dfprlng3 29235 | Alternate definition of (strict) parallelism. Theorem 12.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐴)𝑌 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) = ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | prlngpln3 29236 | Two parallel lines are on a common plane. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴𝐸𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | perpprlng 29237 | If two lines 𝐴 and 𝐵 have a common perpendicular 𝐶 and lie in the same plane 𝐻, then they are parallel. Theorem 12.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | prlngex 29238* | There exists at least one parallel line 𝑏 to a given line 𝐴 through a given point 𝑋. Theorem 12.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 122. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿(𝐴 ∥ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | prlngmolem1 29239* | Lemma for prlngmo 29241: Contradiction: Assuming two different parallels 𝐵 and 𝐶 having a common point 𝑋 exist to a line 𝐴, the geometry cannot be Euclidean (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝑄 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊𝑂𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) | ||
| Theorem | prlngmolem2 29240* | Lemma for prlngmo 29241. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝑏)) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑏 𝑟 ∈ (𝑥(Itv‘𝐺)𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑄 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 𝑠 ∈ (𝑥(Itv‘𝐺)𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿(𝐴 ∥ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | prlngmo 29241* | Playfair's axiom. Given a line 𝐴 and a point 𝑋 not on 𝐴, at most one line parallel to 𝐴 can be drawn through 𝑋. Theorem 12.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 123. Note that this is the first instance of a theorem where the geometry is required to be Euclidean, as expressed by 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE. Theorem A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 24 is used, in the form of axtgeucl 28778, in the proof of prlngmolem1 29239. See prlngex 29238 for the corresponding existence theorem. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿(𝐴 ∥ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | prlngeu 29242* | Given a line 𝐴 and a point 𝑋 not on 𝐴, a unique line parallel to 𝐴 can be drawn through 𝑋. Theorem 12.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 124. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿(𝐴 ∥ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | prlngmo2 29243* | Playfair's axiom, without the restriction that the point 𝑋 is outside of the line 𝐴. Theorem 12.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑏 ∈ ran 𝐿(𝐴 ∥ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | prlngeq 29244 | Playfair's axiom, written as an equality: if two different lines are parallel to a given line at a given point, they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prlngpln4 29245 | Building a parallel line conserves planes, i.e. given a line 𝐴 and a point 𝑋 not on 𝐴, the (unique) parallel 𝐵 to 𝐴 through 𝑋 lies completely within the plane defined by 𝐴 and 𝑋. Theorem 12.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 124. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | prlngplngtr 29246 | Transitivity of parallelism, for lines in the same plane 𝐻. This is case 1 of Theorem 12.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 124. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∥ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | prlnginn0 29247 | A line 𝐶 intersecting another line 𝐴 also intersects any line 𝐵 parallel to 𝐴. Theorem 12.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 125. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | prlngmid2 29248 | If the midpoints of two segments (𝑋𝐼𝑍) and (𝑌𝐼𝑊) coincide, the points 𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍 and 𝑊 form a parallelogram, i.e. the lines (𝑋𝐿𝑌) and (𝑍𝐿𝑊) are parallel. Theorem 12.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 125. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (midG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑀𝑍) = (𝑌𝑀𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | symquadprlng 29249 | Symmetrical quadrilaterals are parallelograms. Theorem 12.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 126. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑊 − 𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊) ∧ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∥ (𝑊𝐿𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | prlngsymquadlem 29250 | Lemma for prlngsymquad 29251. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∥ (𝑊𝐿𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘(𝑋(midG‘𝐺)𝑍))‘𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 = 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | prlngsymquad 29251 | All parallelograms are symmetric quadrilaterals. First part of Theorem 12.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 126. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∥ (𝑊𝐿𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑊) ∧ (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑊 − 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | prlngsymquadopp 29252* | In parallelograms, opposing vertices are on opposite sides of the diagonal. Second part of Theorem 12.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 126. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∥ (𝑊𝐿𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊𝑂𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | quadcgrprlng 29253* | Nontrivial quadrilaterals with congruent and parallel opposite sides are parallelograms. Theorem 12.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 126. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌𝑂𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∥ (𝑊𝐿𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑊 − 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | tgaltai 29254* | Parallelism implies alternate angles congruence: if a line (𝑋𝐿𝑍) crosses two parallel lines (𝑋𝐿𝑌) and (𝑍𝐿𝑊), then the alternate angles are congruent. First direction of Theorem 12.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 126. This is also Proposition 1.29 of Euclid's Elements . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jul-2026.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∥ = (parlnG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝑋𝐿𝑍))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∥ (𝑍𝐿𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌𝑂𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑌𝑋𝑍”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝑊𝑍𝑋”〉) | ||
| Theorem | f1otrgds 29255* | Convenient lemma for f1otrg 29257. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | f1otrgitv 29256* | Convenient lemma for f1otrg 29257. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑌)))) | ||
| Theorem | f1otrg 29257* | A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (LineG‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiG) | ||
| Theorem | f1otrge 29258* | A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also the property of being a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiGE) | ||
| Syntax | cttg 29259 | Function to convert an algebraic structure to a Tarski geometry. |
| class toTG | ||
| Definition | df-ttg 29260* | Define a function converting a subcomplex Hilbert space to a Tarski Geometry. It does so by equipping the structure with a betweenness operation. Note that because the scalar product is applied over the interval (0[,]1), only spaces whose scalar field is a superset of that interval can be considered. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ toTG = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧(-g‘𝑤)𝑥) = (𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)(𝑦(-g‘𝑤)𝑥))}) / 𝑖⦌((𝑤 sSet 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝑖〉) sSet 〈(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})〉)) | ||
| Theorem | ttgval 29261* | Define a function to augment a subcomplex Hilbert space with betweenness and a line definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 = ((𝐻 sSet 〈(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})〉) sSet 〈(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})〉) ∧ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))}))) | ||
| Theorem | ttglem 29262 | Lemma for ttgbas 29263, ttgvsca 29266 etc. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (LineG‘ndx) & ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘𝐻) = (𝐸‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgbas 29263 | The base set of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgplusg 29264 | The addition operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgsub 29265 | The subtraction operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgvsca 29266 | The scalar product of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgds 29267 | The metric of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | ttgitvval 29268* | Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑋𝐼𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))}) | ||
| Theorem | ttgelitv 29269* | Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑍 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | ttgbtwnid 29270 | Any subcomplex module equipped with the betweenness operation fulfills the identity of betweenness (Axiom A6). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | ttgcontlem1 29271 | Lemma for % ttgcont . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (𝑀 / 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0[,]1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0[,]1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0[,]𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝐾 · (𝑌 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑀 · (𝑁 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 + (𝐿 · (𝑁 − 𝐴)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | xmstrkgc 29272 | Any metric space fulfills Tarski's geometry axioms of congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ ∞MetSp → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC) | ||
| Theorem | cchhllem 29273* | Lemma for chlbas and chlvsca . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) sSet 〈(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · (∗‘𝑦)))〉) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx) & ⊢ (·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘ℂfld) = (𝐸‘𝐶) | ||
| Syntax | cee 29274 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean space generator. |
| class 𝔼 | ||
| Syntax | cbtwn 29275 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate. |
| class Btwn | ||
| Syntax | ccgr 29276 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate. |
| class Cgr | ||
| Definition | df-ee 29277 | Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 29280. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑛))) | ||
| Definition | df-btwn 29278* | Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 29286. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ Btwn = ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑧〉, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))} | ||
| Definition | df-cgr 29279* | Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 29287. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ Cgr = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))} | ||
| Theorem | elee 29280 | Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | mptelee 29281* | A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 2-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | mpteleeOLD 29282* | Obsolete version of mptelee 29281 as of 2-Feb-2026. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | eleenn 29283 | If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | eleei 29284 | The forward direction of elee 29280. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | eedimeq 29285 | A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | brbtwn 29286* | The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) | ||
| Theorem | brcgr 29287* | The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | fveere 29288 | The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | fveecn 29289 | The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | eqeefv 29290* | Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖))) | ||
| Theorem | eqeelen 29291* | Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0)) | ||
| Theorem | brbtwn2 29292* | Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))) | ||
| Theorem | colinearalglem1 29293 | Lemma for colinearalg 29297. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷))))) | ||
| Theorem | colinearalglem2 29294* | Lemma for colinearalg 29297. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))) | ||
| Theorem | colinearalglem3 29295* | Lemma for colinearalg 29297. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖))))) | ||
| Theorem | colinearalglem4 29296* | Lemma for colinearalg 29297. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0)) | ||
| Theorem | colinearalg 29297* | An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 29292. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∨ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉 ∨ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))) | ||
| Theorem | eleesub 29298* | Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eleesubd 29299* | Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 29298. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | axdimuniq 29300 | The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |