Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 87 of 450) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28674) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28675-30197) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30198-44986) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | omf1o 8601* | Construct an explicit bijection from 𝐴 ·o 𝐵 to 𝐵 ·o 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐵 ·o 𝑦) +o 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐹):(𝐴 ·o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 ·o 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1olem 8602* | Lemma for pw2f1o 8603. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑆, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ ({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑆 = (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶})))) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1o 8603* | The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with an unordered pair base of ordinal 2. Generalized from Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | pw2eng 8604 | The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | pw2en 8605 | The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2. Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fopwdom 8606 | Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | enfixsn 8607* | Given two equipollent sets, a bijection can always be chosen which fixes a single point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝑌) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌 ∧ (𝑓‘𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem1 8608* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem2 8609* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem3 8610* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem4 8611* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem5 8612* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → dom 𝐻 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem6 8613* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem7 8614* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → Fun 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem8 8615* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ (((Fun 𝑔 ∧ dom 𝑔 = 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → Fun ◡𝐻) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem9 8616* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑔:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sbthlem10 8617* | Lemma for sbth 8618. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))} & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sbth 8618 |
Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This
theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality)
than
𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and
𝐵
are equinumerous (have the
same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved
without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here. The theorem can
also be proved from the axiom of choice and the linear order of the
cardinal numbers, but our development does not provide the linear order
of cardinal numbers until much later and in ways that depend on
Schroeder-Bernstein.
The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 8608 through sbthlem10 8617; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 8617. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. In the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer (ILE) the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem has been proven equivalent to the law of the excluded middle (LEM), and in ILE the LEM is not accepted as necessarily true; see https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/exmidsbth.html 8617. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sbthb 8619 | Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sbthcl 8620 | Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem in class form. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ ≈ = ( ≼ ∩ ◡ ≼ ) | ||
Theorem | dfsdom2 8621 | Alternate definition of strict dominance. Compare Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ ≺ = ( ≼ ∖ ◡ ≼ ) | ||
Theorem | brsdom2 8622 | Alternate definition of strict dominance. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sdomnsym 8623 | Strict dominance is asymmetric. Theorem 21(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | domnsym 8624 | Theorem 22(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 0domg 8625 | Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dom0 8626 | A set dominated by the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
Theorem | 0sdomg 8627 | A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | 0dom 8628 | Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∅ ≼ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | 0sdom 8629 | A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | sdom0 8630 | The empty set does not strictly dominate any set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ ∅ | ||
Theorem | sdomdomtr 8631 | Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance. Theorem 22(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sdomentr 8632 | Transitivity of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | domsdomtr 8633 | Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance. Theorem 22(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | ensdomtr 8634 | Transitivity of equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sdomirr 8635 | Strict dominance is irreflexive. Theorem 21(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | sdomtr 8636 | Strict dominance is transitive. Theorem 21(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sdomn2lp 8637 | Strict dominance has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) |
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | enen1 8638 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | enen2 8639 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | domen1 8640 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | domen2 8641 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sdomen1 8642 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | sdomen2 8643 | Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≺ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | domtriord 8644 | Dominance is trichotomous in the restricted case of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sdomel 8645 | Strict dominance implies ordinal membership. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sdomdif 8646 | The difference of a set from a smaller set cannot be empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | onsdominel 8647 | An ordinal with more elements of some type is larger. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≺ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | domunsn 8648 | Dominance over a set with one element added. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐶}) ≼ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fodomr 8649* | There exists a mapping from a set onto any (nonempty) set that it dominates. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) |
⊢ ((∅ ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pwdom 8650 | Injection of sets implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≼ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | canth2 8651 | Cantor's Theorem. No set is equinumerous to its power set. Specifically, any set has a cardinality (size) strictly less than the cardinality of its power set. For example, the cardinality of real numbers is the same as the cardinality of the power set of integers, so real numbers cannot be put into a one-to-one correspondence with integers. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. For the function version, see canth 7092. This is Metamath 100 proof #63. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | canth2g 8652 | Cantor's theorem with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 2pwuninel 8653 | The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | 2pwne 8654 | No set equals the power set of its power set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | disjen 8655 | A stronger form of pwuninel 7922. We can use pwuninel 7922, 2pwuninel 8653 to create one or two sets disjoint from a given set 𝐴, but here we show that in fact such constructions exist for arbitrarily large disjoint extensions, which is to say that for any set 𝐵 we can construct a set 𝑥 that is equinumerous to it and disjoint from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴}) ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | disjenex 8656* | Existence version of disjen 8655. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥((𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | domss2 8657 | A corollary of disjenex 8656. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then 𝐺 is a right inverse of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = ◡(𝐹 ∪ (1st ↾ ((𝐵 ∖ ran 𝐹) × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | domssex2 8658* | A corollary of disjenex 8656. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then there is a right inverse 𝑔 of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐵–1-1→V ∧ (𝑔 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | domssex 8659* | Weakening of domssex 8659 to forget the functions in favor of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | xpf1o 8660* | Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑌):𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 〈𝑋, 𝑌〉):(𝐴 × 𝐶)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | xpen 8661 | Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | mapen 8662 | Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | mapdom1 8663 | Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | mapxpen 8664 | Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ↑m (𝐵 × 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | xpmapenlem 8665* | Lemma for xpmapen 8666. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xpmapen 8666 | Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | mapunen 8667 | Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ↑m (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) × (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | map2xp 8668 | A cardinal power with exponent 2 is equivalent to a Cartesian product with itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑m 2o) ≈ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mapdom2 8669 | Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(d) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 = ∅)) → (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mapdom3 8670 | Set exponentiation dominates the mantissa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | pwen 8671 | If two sets are equinumerous, then their power sets are equinumerous. Proposition 10.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 87. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ssenen 8672* | Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)}) | ||
Theorem | limenpsi 8673 | A limit ordinal is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ Lim 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅})) | ||
Theorem | limensuci 8674 | A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ Lim 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | limensuc 8675 | A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infensuc 8676 | Any infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. Proved without the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | phplem1 8677 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | phplem2 8678 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | phplem3 8679 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | phplem4 8680 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nneneq 8681 | Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | php 8682 | Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 8677 through phplem4 8680, nneneq 8681, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | php2 8683 | Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | php3 8684 | Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. If 𝐴 is finite and 𝐵 is a proper subset of 𝐴, the 𝐵 is strictly less numerous than 𝐴. Stronger version of Corollary 6C of [Enderton] p. 135. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | php4 8685 | Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 8682: a natural number is strictly dominated by its successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≺ suc 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | php5 8686 | Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 8682: a natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | phpeqd 8687 | Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of php 8682 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | snnen2o 8688 | A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. This holds for proper singletons (𝐴 ∈ V) as well as for singletons being the empty set (𝐴 ∉ V). (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o | ||
Theorem | onomeneq 8689 | An ordinal number equinumerous to a natural number is equal to it. Proposition 10.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | onfin 8690 | An ordinal number is finite iff it is a natural number. Proposition 10.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ω)) | ||
Theorem | onfin2 8691 | A set is a natural number iff it is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ω = (On ∩ Fin) | ||
Theorem | nnfi 8692 | Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | nndomo 8693 | Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nnsdomo 8694 | Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sucdom2 8695 | Strict dominance of a set over another set implies dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sucdom 8696 | Strict dominance of a set over a natural number is the same as dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | 0sdom1dom 8697 | Strict dominance over zero is the same as dominance over one. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) |
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 1sdom2 8698 | Ordinal 1 is strictly dominated by ordinal 2. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) |
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o | ||
Theorem | sdom1 8699 | A set has less than one member iff it is empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
Theorem | modom 8700 | Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≼ 1o) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |