P. 393 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39201-39300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	olm02 39201	Meet with lattice zero is zero. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	isoml 39202*	The predicate "is an orthomodular lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
Theorem	isomliN 39203*	Properties that determine an orthomodular lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OL    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OML
Theorem	omlol 39204	An orthomodular lattice is an ortholattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OL)
Theorem	omlop 39205	An orthomodular lattice is an orthoposet. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
Theorem	omllat 39206	An orthomodular lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	omllaw 39207	The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
Theorem	omllaw2N 39208	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition of OML law in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml2i 31512 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw3 39209	Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31363 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw4 39210	Orthomodular law equivalent. Remark in [Holland95] p. 223. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	omllaw5N 39211	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml5 31540 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cmtcomlemN 39212	Lemma for cmtcomN 39213. (cmcmlem 31518 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 → 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmtcomN 39213	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (cmcmi 31519 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmt2N 39214	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (cmcm2i 31520 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmt3N 39215	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31522 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmt4N 39216	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31522 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr2N 39217	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr2i 31523 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))))
Theorem	cmtbr3N 39218	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr3 31535 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr4N 39219	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (cmbr4i 31528 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	lecmtN 39220	Ordered elements commute. (lecmi 31529 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmtidN 39221	Any element commutes with itself. (cmidi 31537 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	omlfh1N 39222	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 1. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Part of Theorem 5 in [Kalmbach] p. 25. (fh1 31545 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlfh3N 39223	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 3. Dual of omlfh1N 39222. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlmod1i2N 39224	Analogue of modular law atmod1i2 39824 that holds in any OML. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	omlspjN 39225	Contraction of a Sasaki projection. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋)
21.28.10  Atomic lattices with covering property
Syntax	ccvr 39226	Extend class notation with covers relation.
class ⋖
Syntax	catm 39227	Extend class notation with atoms.
class Atoms
Syntax	cal 39228	Extend class notation with atomic lattices.
class AtLat
Syntax	clc 39229	Extend class notation with lattices with the covering property.
class CvLat
Definition	df-covers 39230*	Define the covers relation ("is covered by") for posets. "𝑎 is covered by 𝑏 " means that 𝑎 is strictly less than 𝑏 and there is nothing in between. See cvrval 39233 for the relation form. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ⋖ = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑏 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑧 ∧ 𝑧(lt‘𝑝)𝑏))})
Definition	df-ats 39231*	Define the class of poset atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Atoms = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑎})
Theorem	cvrfval 39232*	Value of covers relation "is covered by". (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	cvrval 39233*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (cvbr 32209 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrlt 39234	The covers relation implies the less-than relation. (cvpss 32212 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 < 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn 39235	There is no element between the two arguments of the covers relation. (cvnbtwn 32213 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ (𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌))
Theorem	ncvr1 39236	No element covers the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 1 𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrletrN 39237	Property of an element above a covering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrval2 39238*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (cvbr2 32210 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 = 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn2 39239	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 32214 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn3 39240	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 32215 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrcon3b 39241	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (cvcon3 32211 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrle 39242	The covers relation implies the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn4 39243	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvnbtwn4 32216 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrnle 39244	The covers relation implies the negation of the converse "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	cvrne 39245	The covers relation implies inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnrefN 39246	The covers relation is not reflexive. (cvnref 32218 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrcmp 39247	If two lattice elements that cover a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍𝐶𝑋 ∧ 𝑍𝐶𝑌)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrcmp2 39248	If two lattice elements covered by a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	pats 39249*	The set of atoms in a poset. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
Theorem	isat 39250	The predicate "is an atom". (ela 32266 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 𝐶𝑃)))
Theorem	isat2 39251	The predicate "is an atom". (elatcv0 32268 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑃))
Theorem	atcvr0 39252	An atom covers zero. (atcv0 32269 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 𝐶𝑃)
Theorem	atbase 39253	An atom is a member of the lattice base set (i.e. a lattice element). (atelch 32271 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atssbase 39254	The set of atoms is a subset of the base set. (atssch 32270 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	0ltat 39255	An atom is greater than zero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 < 𝑃)
Theorem	leatb 39256	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (atss 32273 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑃 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 )))
Theorem	leat 39257	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	leat2 39258	A nonzero poset element less than or equal to an atom equals the atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃)) → 𝑋 = 𝑃)
Theorem	leat3 39259	A poset element less than or equal to an atom is either an atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat 39260	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat2 39261	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Definition	df-atl 39262*	Define the class of atomic lattices, in which every nonzero element is greater than or equal to an atom. We also ensure the existence of a lattice zero, since a lattice by itself may not have a zero. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑝(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
Theorem	isatl 39263*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	atllat 39264	An atomic lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	atlpos 39265	An atomic lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	atl0dm 39266	Condition necessary for zero element to exist. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	atl0cl 39267	An atomic lattice has a zero element. We can use this in place of op0cl 39148 for lattices without orthocomplements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 0 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atl0le 39268	Orthoposet zero is less than or equal to any element. (ch0le 31368 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlle0 39269	An element less than or equal to zero equals zero. (chle0 31370 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 0 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atlltn0 39270	A lattice element greater than zero is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 < 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ))
Theorem	isat3 39271*	The predicate "is an atom". (elat2 32267 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑃 → (𝑥 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑥 = 0 )))))
Theorem	atn0 39272	An atom is not zero. (atne0 32272 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atnle0 39273	An atom is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 0 )
Theorem	atlen0 39274	A lattice element is nonzero if an atom is under it. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atcmp 39275	If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 32274 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	atncmp 39276	Frequently-used variation of atcmp 39275. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atnlt 39277	Two atoms cannot satisfy the less than relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 < 𝑄)
Theorem	atcvreq0 39278	An element covered by an atom must be zero. (atcveq0 32275 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝐶𝑃 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atncvrN 39279	Two atoms cannot satisfy the covering relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃𝐶𝑄)
Theorem	atlex 39280*	Every nonzero element of an atomic lattice is greater than or equal to an atom. (hatomic 32287 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atnle 39281	Two ways of expressing "an atom is not less than or equal to a lattice element." (atnssm0 32303 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ))
Theorem	atnem0 39282	The meet of distinct atoms is zero. (atnemeq0 32304 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑄) = 0 ))
Theorem	atlatmstc 39283*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32289 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	atlatle 39284*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32298 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atlrelat1 39285*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32290, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Definition	df-cvlat 39286*	Define the class of atomic lattices with the covering property. (This is actually the exchange property, but they are equivalent. The literature usually uses the covering property terminology.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ CvLat = {𝑘 ∈ AtLat ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑏 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)((¬ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)𝑐 ∧ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑏)) → 𝑏(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑎))}
Theorem	iscvlat 39287*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	iscvlat2N 39288*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑝 ∧ 𝑥) = 0 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	cvlatl 39289	An atomic lattice with the covering property is an atomic lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ AtLat)
Theorem	cvllat 39290	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	cvlposN 39291	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	cvlexch1 39292	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch2 39293	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexchb1 39294	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlexchb2 39295	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexch3 39296	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32308 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch4N 39297	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb1 39298	A version of cvlexchb1 39294 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb2 39299	A version of cvlexchb2 39295 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlatexch1 39300	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))