P. 393 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39201-39300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lkrpssN 39201	Proper subset relation between kernels. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘𝐺) ⊊ (𝐾‘𝐻) ↔ (𝐺 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐻 = 0 )))
Theorem	lkrin 39202	Intersection of the kernels of 2 functionals is included in the kernel of their sum. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘𝐺) ∩ (𝐾‘𝐻)) ⊆ (𝐾‘(𝐺 + 𝐻)))
Theorem	eqlkr4 39203*	Two functionals with the same kernel are the same up to a constant. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘𝐺) = (𝐾‘𝐻))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝐻 = (𝑟 · 𝐺))
Theorem	ldual1dim 39204*	Equivalent expressions for a 1-dim subspace (ray) of functionals. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘{𝐺}) = {𝑔 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝐿‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝑔)})
Theorem	ldualkrsc 39205	The kernel of a nonzero scalar product of a functional equals the kernel of the functional. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿‘(𝑋 · 𝐺)) = (𝐿‘𝐺))
Theorem	lkrss 39206	The kernel of a scalar product of a functional includes the kernel of the functional. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝑋 · 𝐺)))
Theorem	lkrss2N 39207*	Two functionals with kernels in a subset relationship. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝐾‘𝐻) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝐻 = (𝑟 · 𝐺)))
Theorem	lkreqN 39208	Proportional functionals have equal kernels. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ∖ { 0 }))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐴 · 𝐻))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘𝐺) = (𝐾‘𝐻))
Theorem	lkrlspeqN 39209	Condition for colinear functionals to have equal kernels. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LKer‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (LDual‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ((𝑁‘{𝐻}) ∖ { 0 }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿‘𝐺) = (𝐿‘𝐻))
21.28.9  Ortholattices and orthomodular lattices
Syntax	cops 39210	Extend class notation with orthoposets.
class OP
Syntax	ccmtN 39211	Extend class notation with the commutes relation.
class cm
Syntax	col 39212	Extend class notation with orthlattices.
class OL
Syntax	coml 39213	Extend class notation with orthomodular lattices.
class OML
Definition	df-oposet 39214*	Define the class of orthoposets, which are bounded posets with an orthocomplementation operation. Note that (Base p ) e. dom ( lub 𝑝) means there is an upper bound 1., and similarly for the 0. element. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) (Revised by NM, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ OP = {𝑝 ∈ Poset ∣ (((Base‘𝑝) ∈ dom (lub‘𝑝) ∧ (Base‘𝑝) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑝)) ∧ ∃𝑜(𝑜 = (oc‘𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(((𝑜‘𝑎) ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ (𝑜‘(𝑜‘𝑎)) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎(le‘𝑝)𝑏 → (𝑜‘𝑏)(le‘𝑝)(𝑜‘𝑎))) ∧ (𝑎(join‘𝑝)(𝑜‘𝑎)) = (1.‘𝑝) ∧ (𝑎(meet‘𝑝)(𝑜‘𝑎)) = (0.‘𝑝))))}
Definition	df-cmtN 39215*	Define the commutes relation for orthoposets. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ cm = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥(meet‘𝑝)𝑦)(join‘𝑝)(𝑥(meet‘𝑝)((oc‘𝑝)‘𝑦))))})
Definition	df-ol 39216	Define the class of ortholattices. Definition from [Kalmbach] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ OL = (Lat ∩ OP)
Definition	df-oml 39217*	Define the class of orthomodular lattices. Definition from [Kalmbach] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ OML = {𝑙 ∈ OL ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑙)∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑙)(𝑎(le‘𝑙)𝑏 → 𝑏 = (𝑎(join‘𝑙)(𝑏(meet‘𝑙)((oc‘𝑙)‘𝑎))))}
Theorem	isopos 39218*	The predicate "is an orthoposet." (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP ↔ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((( ⊥ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑦) ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) ∧ (𝑥 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = 1 ∧ (𝑥 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = 0 )))
Theorem	opposet 39219	Every orthoposet is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	oposlem 39220	Lemma for orthoposet properties. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 1 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ))
Theorem	op01dm 39221	Conditions necessary for zero and unity elements to exist. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺))
Theorem	op0cl 39222	An orthoposet has a zero element. (h0elch 31230 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → 0 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	op1cl 39223	An orthoposet has a unity element. (helch 31218 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → 1 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	op0le 39224	Orthoposet zero is less than or equal to any element. (ch0le 31416 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	ople0 39225	An element less than or equal to zero equals zero. (chle0 31418 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 0 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	opnlen0 39226	An element not less than another is nonzero. TODO: Look for uses of necon3bd 2942 and op0le 39224 to see if this is useful elsewhere. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	lub0N 39227	The least upper bound of the empty set is the zero element. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → ( 1 ‘∅) = 0 )
Theorem	opltn0 39228	A lattice element greater than zero is nonzero. TODO: is this needed? (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 < 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ))
Theorem	ople1 39229	Any element is less than the orthoposet unity. (chss 31204 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ 1 )
Theorem	op1le 39230	If the orthoposet unity is less than or equal to an element, the element equals the unit. (chle0 31418 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 1 ))
Theorem	glb0N 39231	The greatest lower bound of the empty set is the unity element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → (𝐺‘∅) = 1 )
Theorem	opoccl 39232	Closure of orthocomplement operation. (choccl 31281 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	opococ 39233	Double negative law for orthoposets. (ococ 31381 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	opcon3b 39234	Contraposition law for orthoposets. (chcon3i 31441 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	opcon2b 39235	Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon2 11411 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	opcon1b 39236	Orthocomplement contraposition law. (negcon1 11410 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	oplecon3 39237	Contraposition law for orthoposets. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	oplecon3b 39238	Contraposition law for orthoposets. (chsscon3 31475 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ≤ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	oplecon1b 39239	Contraposition law for strict ordering in orthoposets. (chsscon1 31476 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	opoc1 39240	Orthocomplement of orthoposet unity. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → ( ⊥ ‘ 1 ) = 0 )
Theorem	opoc0 39241	Orthocomplement of orthoposet zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OP → ( ⊥ ‘ 0 ) = 1 )
Theorem	opltcon3b 39242	Contraposition law for strict ordering in orthoposets. (chpsscon3 31478 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) < ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	opltcon1b 39243	Contraposition law for strict ordering in orthoposets. (chpsscon1 31479 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) < 𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) < 𝑋))
Theorem	opltcon2b 39244	Contraposition law for strict ordering in orthoposets. (chsscon2 31477 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < ( ⊥ ‘𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 < ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	opexmid 39245	Law of excluded middle for orthoposets. (chjo 31490 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 1 )
Theorem	opnoncon 39246	Law of contradiction for orthoposets. (chocin 31470 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 )
Theorem	riotaocN 39247*	The orthocomplement of the unique poset element such that 𝜓. (riotaneg 12098 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ( ⊥ ‘𝑦) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) = ( ⊥ ‘(℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	cmtfvalN 39248*	Value of commutes relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑦))))})
Theorem	cmtvalN 39249	Equivalence for commutes relation. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (cmbr 31559 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))))
Theorem	isolat 39250	The predicate "is an ortholattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OL ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ OP))
Theorem	ollat 39251	An ortholattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OL → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	olop 39252	An ortholattice is an orthoposet. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OL → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
Theorem	olposN 39253	An ortholattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OL → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	isolatiN 39254	Properties that determine an ortholattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ Lat    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OP    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OL
Theorem	oldmm1 39255	De Morgan's law for meet in an ortholattice. (chdmm1 31500 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	oldmm2 39256	De Morgan's law for meet in an ortholattice. (chdmm2 31501 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	oldmm3N 39257	De Morgan's law for meet in an ortholattice. (chdmm3 31502 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) = (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	oldmm4 39258	De Morgan's law for meet in an ortholattice. (chdmm4 31503 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	oldmj1 39259	De Morgan's law for join in an ortholattice. (chdmj1 31504 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	oldmj2 39260	De Morgan's law for join in an ortholattice. (chdmj2 31505 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	oldmj3 39261	De Morgan's law for join in an ortholattice. (chdmj3 31506 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) = (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	oldmj4 39262	De Morgan's law for join in an ortholattice. (chdmj4 31507 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	olj01 39263	An ortholattice element joined with zero equals itself. (chj0 31472 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ 0 ) = 𝑋)
Theorem	olj02 39264	An ortholattice element joined with zero equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 ∨ 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	olm11 39265	The meet of an ortholattice element with one equals itself. (chm1i 31431 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 1 ) = 𝑋)
Theorem	olm12 39266	The meet of an ortholattice element with one equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	latmassOLD 39267	Ortholattice meet is associative. (This can also be proved for lattices with a longer proof.) (inass 4178 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	latm12 39268	A rearrangement of lattice meet. (in12 4179 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	latm32 39269	A rearrangement of lattice meet. (in12 4179 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	latmrot 39270	Rotate lattice meet of 3 classes. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑍 ∧ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	latm4 39271	Rearrangement of lattice meet of 4 classes. (in4 4184 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑍 ∧ 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	latmmdiN 39272	Lattice meet distributes over itself. (inindi 4185 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	latmmdir 39273	Lattice meet distributes over itself. (inindir 4186 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	olm01 39274	Meet with lattice zero is zero. (chm0 31466 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∧ 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	olm02 39275	Meet with lattice zero is zero. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	isoml 39276*	The predicate "is an orthomodular lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
Theorem	isomliN 39277*	Properties that determine an orthomodular lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OL    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ OML
Theorem	omlol 39278	An orthomodular lattice is an ortholattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OL)
Theorem	omlop 39279	An orthomodular lattice is an orthoposet. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OP)
Theorem	omllat 39280	An orthomodular lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	omllaw 39281	The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
Theorem	omllaw2N 39282	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition of OML law in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml2i 31560 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw3 39283	Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31411 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw4 39284	Orthomodular law equivalent. Remark in [Holland95] p. 223. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	omllaw5N 39285	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml5 31588 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cmtcomlemN 39286	Lemma for cmtcomN 39287. (cmcmlem 31566 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 → 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmtcomN 39287	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (cmcmi 31567 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmt2N 39288	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (cmcm2i 31568 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmt3N 39289	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31570 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmt4N 39290	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31570 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr2N 39291	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr2i 31571 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))))
Theorem	cmtbr3N 39292	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr3 31583 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr4N 39293	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (cmbr4i 31576 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	lecmtN 39294	Ordered elements commute. (lecmi 31577 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmtidN 39295	Any element commutes with itself. (cmidi 31585 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	omlfh1N 39296	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 1. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Part of Theorem 5 in [Kalmbach] p. 25. (fh1 31593 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlfh3N 39297	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 3. Dual of omlfh1N 39296. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlmod1i2N 39298	Analogue of modular law atmod1i2 39897 that holds in any OML. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	omlspjN 39299	Contraction of a Sasaki projection. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋)
21.28.10  Atomic lattices with covering property
Syntax	ccvr 39300	Extend class notation with covers relation.
class ⋖