P. 393 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39201-39300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
20.26.2  Arithmetic theorems Towards the start of this section are several proofs regarding the different complex number axioms that could be used to prove some results. For example, ax-1rid 10607 is used in mulid1 10639 related theorems, so one could trade off the extra axioms in mulid1 10639 for the axioms needed to prove that something is a real number. Another example is avoiding complex number closure laws by using real number closure laws and then using ax-resscn 10594; in the other direction, real number closure laws can be avoided by using ax-resscn 10594 and then the complex number closure laws. (This only works if the result of (𝐴 + 𝐵) only needs to be a complex number). The natural numbers are especially amenable to axiom reductions, as the set ℕ is the recursive set {1, (1 + 1), ((1 + 1) + 1)}, etc., i.e. the set of numbers formed by only additions of 1. The digits 2 through 9 are defined so that they expand into additions of 1. This makes adding natural numbers conveniently only require the rearrangement of parentheses, as shown with the following: (4 + 3) = 7 ((3 + 1) + (2 + 1)) = (6 + 1) ((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + ((1 + 1) + 1)) = ((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) This only requires ax-addass 10602, ax-1cn 10595, and ax-addcl 10597. (And in practice, the expression isn't completely expanded into ones.) Multiplication by 1 requires either mulid2i 10646 or (ax-1rid 10607 and 1re 10641) as seen in 1t1e1 11800 and 1t1e1ALT 39204. Multiplying with greater natural numbers uses ax-distr 10604. Still, this takes fewer axioms than adding zero. When zero is involved in the decimal constructor, there's an implicit addition operation which causes such theorems (e.g. (9 + 1) = ;10) to use almost every complex number axiom.
Theorem	c0exALT 39201	Alternate proof of c0ex 10635 using more set theory axioms but fewer complex number axioms (add ax-10 2145, ax-11 2161, ax-13 2390, ax-nul 5210, and remove ax-1cn 10595, ax-icn 10596, ax-addcl 10597, and ax-mulcl 10599). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ V
Theorem	0cnALT3 39202	Alternate proof of 0cn 10633 using ax-resscn 10594, ax-addrcl 10598, ax-rnegex 10608, ax-cnre 10610 instead of ax-icn 10596, ax-addcl 10597, ax-mulcl 10599, ax-i2m1 10605. Version of 0cnALT 10874 using ax-1cn 10595 instead of ax-icn 10596. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	elre0re 39203	Specialized version of 0red 10644 without using ax-1cn 10595 and ax-cnre 10610. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	1t1e1ALT 39204	Alternate proof of 1t1e1 11800 using a different set of axioms (add ax-mulrcl 10600, ax-i2m1 10605, ax-1ne0 10606, ax-rrecex 10609 and remove ax-resscn 10594, ax-mulcom 10601, ax-mulass 10603, ax-distr 10604). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (1 · 1) = 1
Theorem	remulcan2d 39205	mulcan2d 11274 for real numbers using fewer axioms. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) = (𝐵 · 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	readdid1addid2d 39206	Given some real number 𝐵 where 𝐴 acts like a right additive identity, derive that 𝐴 is a left additive identity. Note that the hypothesis is weaker than proving that 𝐴 is a right additive identity (for all numbers). Although, if there is a right additive identity, then by readdcan 10814, 𝐴 is the right additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐶)
Theorem	sn-1ne2 39207	A proof of 1ne2 11846 without using ax-mulcom 10601, ax-mulass 10603, ax-pre-mulgt0 10614. Based on mul02lem2 10817. (Contributed by SN, 13-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 2
Theorem	nnn1suc 39208*	A positive integer that is not 1 is a successor of some other positive integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝑥 + 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnadd1com 39209	Addition with 1 is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) = (1 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcom 39210	Addition is commutative for natural numbers. Uses fewer axioms than addcom 10826. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	nnaddcomli 39211	Version of addcomli 10832 for natural numbers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	nnadddir 39212	Right-distributivity for natural numbers without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	nnmul1com 39213	Multiplication with 1 is commutative for natural numbers, without ax-mulcom 10601. Since (𝐴 · 1) is 𝐴 by ax-1rid 10607, this is equivalent to remulid2 39298 for natural numbers, but using fewer axioms (avoiding ax-resscn 10594, ax-addass 10602, ax-mulass 10603, ax-rnegex 10608, ax-pre-lttri 10611, ax-pre-lttrn 10612, ax-pre-ltadd 10613). (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 · 𝐴) = (𝐴 · 1))
Theorem	nnmulcom 39214	Multiplication is commutative for natural numbers. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	addsubeq4com 39215	Relation between sums and differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	sqsumi 39216	A sum squared. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐴) + (𝐵 · 𝐵)) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	negn0nposznnd 39217	Lemma for dffltz 39320. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → -𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	sqmid3api 39218	Value of the square of the middle term of a 3-term arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 20-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝑁) = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝑁) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝑁 · 𝑁))
Theorem	decaddcom 39219	Commute ones place in addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 + 𝐶) = (;𝐴𝐶 + 𝐵)
Theorem	sqn5i 39220	The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;(𝐴 · (𝐴 + 1))25
Theorem	sqn5ii 39221	The square of a number ending in 5. This shortcut only works because 5 is half of 10. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴5 · ;𝐴5) = ;;𝐶25
Theorem	decpmulnc 39222	Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication, no carry. Compare muladdi 11091. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;;𝐸𝐹𝐺
Theorem	decpmul 39223	Partial products algorithm for two digit multiplication. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = 𝐹    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = ;𝐺𝐻    &   ⊢ (;𝐸𝐺 + 𝐹) = 𝐼    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐶𝐷) = ;𝐼𝐻
Theorem	sqdeccom12 39224	The square of a number in terms of its digits switched. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (;𝐵𝐴 · ;𝐵𝐴)) = (;99 · ((𝐴 · 𝐴) − (𝐵 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	sq3deccom12 39225	Variant of sqdeccom12 39224 with a three digit square. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐶) = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ ((;;𝐴𝐵𝐶 · ;;𝐴𝐵𝐶) − (;𝐷𝐵 · ;𝐷𝐵)) = (;99 · ((;𝐴𝐵 · ;𝐴𝐵) − (𝐶 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	235t711 39226	Calculate a product by long multiplication as a base comparison with other multiplication algorithms. Conveniently, 711 has two ones which greatly simplifies calculations like 235 · 1. There isn't a higher level mulcomli 10650 saving the lower level uses of mulcomli 10650 within 235 · 7 since mulcom2 doesn't exist, but if commuted versions of theorems like 7t2e14 12208 are added then this proof would benefit more than ex-decpmul 39227. For practicality, this proof doesn't have "e167085" at the end of its name like 2p2e4 11773 or 8t7e56 12219. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085
Theorem	ex-decpmul 39227	Example usage of decpmul 39223. This proof is significantly longer than 235t711 39226. There is more unnecessary carrying compared to 235t711 39226. Although saving 5 visual steps, using mulcomli 10650 early on increases the compressed proof length. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 10-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (;;235 · ;;711) = ;;;;;167085
20.26.3  Exponents
Theorem	oexpreposd 39228	Lemma for dffltz 39320. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑀 / 2) ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < 𝑁 ↔ 0 < (𝑁↑𝑀)))
Theorem	cxpgt0d 39229	Exponentiation with a positive mantissa is positive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴↑𝑐𝑁))
Theorem	dvdsexpim 39230	dvdssqim 15904 generalized to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 2-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ 𝐵 → (𝐴↑𝑁) ∥ (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	nn0rppwr 39231	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are relatively prime, then so are 𝐴↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑁. rppwr 15908 extended to nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)) = 1))
Theorem	expgcd 39232	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. sqgcd 15909 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 4-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	nn0expgcd 39233	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. nn0gcdsq 16092 extended to nonnegative exponents. expgcd 39232 extended to nonnegative bases. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	zexpgcd 39234	Exponentiation distributes over GCD. zgcdsq 16093 extended to nonnegative exponents. nn0expgcd 39233 extended to integer bases by symmetry. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵)↑𝑁) = ((𝐴↑𝑁) gcd (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	numdenexp 39235	numdensq 16094 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((numer‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((numer‘𝐴)↑𝑁) ∧ (denom‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((denom‘𝐴)↑𝑁)))
Theorem	numexp 39236	numsq 16095 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (numer‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((numer‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	denexp 39237	densq 16096 extended to nonnegative exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 5-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (denom‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((denom‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	exp11d 39238	sq11d 13622 for positive real bases and nonzero exponents. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) = (𝐵↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ltexp1d 39239	ltmul1d 12473 for exponentiation of positive reals. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁)))
Theorem	ltexp1dd 39240	Raising both sides of 'less than' to the same positive integer preserves ordering. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 24-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑁) < (𝐵↑𝑁))
Theorem	zrtelqelz 39241	zsqrtelqelz 16098 generalized to positive integer roots. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	zrtdvds 39242	A positive integer root divides its integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∥ 𝐴)
Theorem	rtprmirr 39243	The root of a prime number is irrational. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑃↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
20.26.4  Real subtraction
Syntax	cresub 39244	Real number subtraction.
class −ℝ
Definition	df-resub 39245*	Define subtraction between real numbers. This operator saves a few axioms over df-sub 10872 in certain situations. Theorem resubval 39246 shows its value, resubadd 39258 relates it to addition, and rersubcl 39257 proves its closure. Based on df-sub 10872. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.)
⊢ −ℝ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥))
Theorem	resubval 39246*	Value of real subtraction, which is the (unique) real 𝑥 such that 𝐵 + 𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴))
Theorem	renegeulemv 39247*	Lemma for renegeu 39249 and similar. Derive existential uniqueness from existence. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegeulem 39248*	Lemma for renegeu 39249 and similar. Remove a change in bound variables from renegeulemv 39247. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝐵 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegeu 39249*	Existential uniqueness of real negatives. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	rernegcl 39250	Closure law for negative reals. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 −ℝ 𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	renegadd 39251	Relationship between real negation and addition. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 −ℝ 𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 0))
Theorem	renegid 39252	Addition of a real number and its negative. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + (0 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 0)
Theorem	reneg0addid2 39253	Negative zero is a left additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0 −ℝ 0) + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	resubeulem1 39254	Lemma for resubeu 39256. A value which when added to zero, results in negative zero. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 + (0 −ℝ (0 + 0))) = (0 −ℝ 0))
Theorem	resubeulem2 39255	Lemma for resubeu 39256. A value which when added to 𝐴, results in 𝐵. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + ((0 −ℝ 𝐴) + ((0 −ℝ (0 + 0)) + 𝐵))) = 𝐵)
Theorem	resubeu 39256*	Existential uniqueness of real differences. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	rersubcl 39257	Closure for real subtraction. Based on subcl 10885. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	resubadd 39258	Relation between real subtraction and addition. Based on subadd 10889. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	resubaddd 39259	Relationship between subtraction and addition. Based on subaddd 11015. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	resubf 39260	Real subtraction is an operation on the real numbers. Based on subf 10888. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.)
⊢ −ℝ :(ℝ × ℝ)⟶ℝ
Theorem	repncan2 39261	Addition and subtraction of equals. Compare pncan2 10893. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	repncan3 39262	Addition and subtraction of equals. Based on pncan3 10894. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	readdsub 39263	Law for addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	reladdrsub 39264	Move LHS of a sum into RHS of a (real) difference. Version of mvlladdd 11051 with real subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐴))
Theorem	reltsub1 39265	Subtraction from both sides of 'less than'. Compare ltsub1 11136. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) < (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)))
Theorem	reltsubadd2 39266	'Less than' relationship between addition and subtraction. Compare ltsubadd2 11111. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	resubcan2 39267	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare subcan2 10911. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	resubsub4 39268	Law for double subtraction. Compare subsub4 10919. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) −ℝ 𝐶) = (𝐴 −ℝ (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	rennncan2 39269	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare nnncan2 10923. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶) −ℝ (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	renpncan3 39270	Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare npncan3 10924. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐴)) = (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐵))
Theorem	repnpcan 39271	Cancellation law for addition and real subtraction. Compare pnpcan 10925. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	reppncan 39272	Cancellation law for mixed addition and real subtraction. Compare ppncan 10928. (Contributed by SN, 3-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 + 𝐵))
Theorem	resubidaddid1lem 39273	Lemma for resubidaddid1 39274. A special case of npncan 10907. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	resubidaddid1 39274	Any real number subtracted from itself forms a left additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) + 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	resubdi 39275	Distribution of multiplication over real subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	re1m1e0m0 39276	Equality of two left-additive identities. See resubidaddid1 39274. Uses ax-i2m1 10605. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (1 −ℝ 1) = (0 −ℝ 0)
Theorem	sn-00idlem1 39277	Lemma for sn-00id 39280. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · (0 −ℝ 0)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴))
Theorem	sn-00idlem2 39278	Lemma for sn-00id 39280. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) ≠ 0 → (0 −ℝ 0) = 1)
Theorem	sn-00idlem3 39279	Lemma for sn-00id 39280. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) = 1 → (0 + 0) = 0)
Theorem	sn-00id 39280	00id 10815 proven without ax-mulcom 10601 but using ax-1ne0 10606. (Though note that the current version of 00id 10815 can be changed to avoid ax-icn 10596, ax-addcl 10597, ax-mulcl 10599, ax-i2m1 10605, ax-cnre 10610. Most of this is by using 0cnALT3 39202 instead of 0cn 10633). (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
Theorem	re0m0e0 39281	Real number version of 0m0e0 11758 proven without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (0 −ℝ 0) = 0
Theorem	readdid2 39282	Real number version of addid2 10823. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sn-addid2 39283	addid2 10823 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	remul02 39284	Real number version of mul02 10818 proven without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	sn-0ne2 39285	0ne2 11845 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 0 ≠ 2
Theorem	remul01 39286	Real number version of mul01 10819 proven without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	resubid 39287	Subtraction of a real number from itself (compare subid 10905). (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	readdid1 39288	Real number version of addid1 10820, without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	resubid1 39289	Real number version of subid1 10906, without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegneg 39290	A real number is equal to the negative of its negative. Compare negneg 10936. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 −ℝ (0 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	readdcan2 39291	Commuted version of readdcan 10814 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	sn-ltaddpos 39292	ltaddpos 11130 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 < (𝐵 + 𝐴)))
Theorem	relt0neg1 39293	Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg1 11146. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ 0 < (0 −ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	relt0neg2 39294	Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg2 11147. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ (0 −ℝ 𝐴) < 0))
Theorem	sn-0lt1 39295	0lt1 11162 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ 0 < 1
Theorem	sn-ltp1 39296	ltp1 11480 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 < (𝐴 + 1))
Theorem	remulinvcom 39297	A left multiplicative inverse is a right multiplicative inverse. Proven without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	remulid2 39298	Commuted version of ax-1rid 10607 and real number version of mulid2 10640 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	remulcand 39299	Commuted version of remulcan2d 39205 without ax-mulcom 10601. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20.26.5  Projective spaces Looking at a corner in 3D space, one can see three right angles. It is impossible to draw three lines in 2D space such that any two of these lines are perpendicular, but a good enough representation is made by casting lines from the 2D surface. Points along the same cast line are collapsed into one point on the 2D surface. In many cases, the 2D surface is smaller than whatever needs to be represented. If the lines cast were perpendicular to the 2D surface, then only areas as small as the 2D surface could be represented. To fix this, the lines need to get further apart as they go farther from the 2D surface. On the other side of the 2D surface the lines will get closer together and intersect at a point. (Because it's defined that way). From this perspective, two parallel lines in 3D space will be represented by two lines that seem to intersect at a point "at infinity". Considering all maximal classes of parallel lines on a 2D plane in 3D space, these classes will all appear to intersect at different points at infinity, forming a line at infinity. Therefore the real projective plane can be thought of as the real affine plane together with the line at infinity. The projective plane takes care of some exceptions that may be found in the affine plane. For example, consider the curve that is the zeroes of 𝑦 = 𝑥↑2. Any line connecting the point (0, 1) to the x-axis intersects with the curve twice, except for the vertical line between (0, 1) and (0, 0). In the projective plane, the curve becomes an ellipse and there is no exception. While it may not seem like it, points at infinity and points corresponding to the affine plane are the same type of point. Consider a line going through the origin in 3D (affine) space. Either it intersects the plane 𝑧 = 1 once, or it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0. If it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0, then it corresponds to the point at infinity intersecting all lines on the plane 𝑧 = 1 with the same slope. Else it corresponds to the point in the 2D plane 𝑧 = 1 that it intersects. So there is a bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points on the real projective plane. The concept of projective spaces generalizes the projective plane to any dimension.
Syntax	cprjsp 39300	Extend class notation with the projective space function.
class ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛