P. 393 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39201-39300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	antisymrelres 39201*	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	antisymrelressn 39202	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jun-2024.)
⊢ AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.26.21  Partitions: disjoints on domain quotients
Definition	df-parts 39203	Define the class of all partitions, cf. the comment of df-disjs 39124. Partitions are disjoints on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to disjoints). This is a more general meaning of partition than we we are familiar with: the conventional meaning of partition (e.g. partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 39124) is what we call membership partition here, cf. dfmembpart2 39208. The binary partitions relation and the partition predicate are the same, that is, (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴) if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39211. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Parts = ( DomainQss ↾ Disjs )
Definition	df-part 39204	Define the partition predicate (read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅). Alternative definition is dfpart2 39207. The binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39211. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-membparts 39205	Define the class of member partition relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ MembParts = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Parts 𝑎}
Definition	df-membpart 39206	Define the member partition predicate, or the disjoint restricted element relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) A alternative definition is dfmembpart2 39208. Member partition is the conventional meaning of partition (see the notes of df-parts 39203 and dfmembpart2 39208), we generalize the concept in df-parts 39203 and df-part 39204. Member partition and comember equivalence are the same by mpet 39288. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	dfpart2 39207	Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfmembpart2 39208	Alternate definition of the conventional membership case of partition. Partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	brparts 39209	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	brparts2 39210	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	brpartspart 39211	Binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq1 39212	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq2 39213	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq12 39214	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq1i 39215	Equality theorem for partition, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴)
Theorem	parteq1d 39216	Equality theorem for partition, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	partsuc2 39217	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part ((𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	partsuc 39218	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
21.26.22  Partition-Equivalence Theorems
Theorem	disjim 39219	The "Divide et Aequivalere" Theorem: every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation: generalization of the former prter1 39339, cf. eldisjim 39222. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	disjimi 39220	Every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	detlem 39221	If a relation is disjoint, then it is equivalent to the equivalent cosets of the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjim 39222	If the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint, then it has equivalent coelements (former prter1 39339). Special case of disjim 39219. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 13-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 8-Feb-2018.) ( Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → CoElEqvRel 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjim2 39223	Alternate form of eldisjim 39222. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → EqvRel ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel0 39224	The null class is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ∅
Theorem	det0 39225	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation if and only if the null class is disjoint (which it is, see disjALTV0 39189). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ∅ ↔ EqvRel ≀ ∅)
Theorem	eqvrelcoss0 39226	The cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ∅
Theorem	eqvrelid 39227	The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel I
Theorem	eqvrel1cossidres 39228	The cosets by a restricted identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel1cossinidres 39229	The cosets by an intersection with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39230	The cosets by a range Cartesian product with a restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detid 39231	The cosets by the identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj I ↔ EqvRel ≀ I )
Theorem	eqvrelcossid 39232	The cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ EqvRel ≀ I
Theorem	detidres 39233	The cosets by the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	detinidres 39234	The cosets by the intersection with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the intersection with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	detxrnidres 39235	The cosets by the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation are in equivalence relation if and only if the range Cartesian product with the restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjlem14 39236*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243, partim2 39245 and petlem 39250 via disjlem17 39237, (general version of the former prtlem14 39334). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ((𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝑦]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem17 39237*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243, partim2 39245 and petlem 39250 via disjlem18 39238, (general version of the former prtlem17 39336). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (∃𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑦]𝑅) → 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))
Theorem	disjlem18 39238*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243, partim2 39245 and petlem 39250 via disjlem19 39239, (general version of the former prtlem18 39337). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵))))
Theorem	disjlem19 39239*	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243, partim2 39245 and petlem 39250 via disjdmqs 39242, (general version of the former prtlem19 39338). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅) → [𝑥]𝑅 = [𝐴] ≀ 𝑅)))
Theorem	disjdmqsss 39240	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243 via disjdmqs 39242. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ⊆ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqscossss 39241	Lemma for disjdmqseq 39243 via disjdmqs 39242. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqs 39242	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to the domain quotient of the cosets by it. Lemma for partim2 39245 and petlem 39250 via disjdmqseq 39243. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	disjdmqseq 39243	If a relation is disjoint, its domain quotient is equal to a class if and only if the domain quotient of the cosets by it is equal to the class. General version of eldisjn0el 39244 (which is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39341). Lemma for partim2 39245 and petlem 39250. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴 ↔ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjn0el 39244	Special case of disjdmqseq 39243 (perhaps this is the closest theorem to the former prter2 39341). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim2 39245	Disjoint relation on its natural domain implies an equivalence relation on the cosets of the relation, on its natural domain, cf. partim 39246. Lemma for petlem 39250. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	partim 39246	Partition implies equivalence relation by the cosets of the relation on its natural domain, cf. partim2 39245. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ≀ 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	partimeq 39247	Partition implies that the class of coelements on the natural domain is equal to the class of cosets of the relation, cf. erimeq 39099. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → ∼ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjlem19 39248*	Special case of disjlem19 39239 (together with membpartlem19 39249, this is former prtlem19 39338). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	membpartlem19 39249*	Together with disjlem19 39239, this is former prtlem19 39338. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ( MembPart 𝐴 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑢) → 𝑢 = [𝐵] ∼ 𝐴)))
Theorem	petlem 39250	If you can prove that the equivalence of cosets on their natural domain implies disjointness (e.g. eqvrelqseqdisj5 39282), or converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39133), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. Lemma for the Partition Equivalence Theorem pet2 39299. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petlemi 39251	If you can prove disjointness (e.g. disjALTV0 39189, disjALTVid 39190, disjALTVidres 39191, disjALTVxrnidres 39193, search for theorems containing the ' |- Disj ' string), or the same with converse function (cf. dfdisjALTV 39133), then disjointness, and equivalence of cosets, both on their natural domain, are equivalent. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ 𝑅 ∧ (dom ≀ 𝑅 / ≀ 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet02 39252	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ∅ ∧ (dom ∅ / ∅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ∅ ∧ (dom ≀ ∅ / ≀ ∅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet0 39253	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the null class if and only if the cosets by the null class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∅ Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ∅ ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petid2 39254	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj I ∧ (dom I / I ) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ I ∧ (dom ≀ I / ≀ I ) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petid 39255	A class is a partition by the identity class if and only if the cosets by the identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( I Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ I ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petidres2 39256	Class 𝐴 is a partition by the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) / ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petidres 39257	A class is a partition by identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the restricted identity class are in equivalence relation on it, cf. eqvrel1cossidres 39228. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petinidres2 39258	Class 𝐴 is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petinidres 39259	A class is a partition by an intersection with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the intersection are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossinidres 38874, disjALTVinidres 39192 and eqvrel1cossinidres 39229. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	petxrnidres2 39260	Class 𝐴 is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petxrnidres 39261	A class is a partition by a range Cartesian product with the identity class restricted to it if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossxrnidres 38876, disjALTVxrnidres 39193 and eqvrel1cossxrnidres 39230. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvreldisj1 39262*	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj2 39263, eqvreldisj3 39264). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 3-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj2 39263	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. eqvreldisj3 39264). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ElDisj (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eqvreldisj3 39264	The elements of the quotient set of an equivalence relation are disjoint (cf. qsdisj2 8735). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (◡ E ↾ (𝐴 / 𝑅)))
Theorem	eqvreldisj4 39265	Intersection with the converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ∩ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvreldisj5 39266	Range Cartesian product with converse epsilon relation restricted to the quotient set of an equivalence relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → Disj (𝑆 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ (𝐵 / 𝑅))))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj2 39267	Implication of eqvreldisj2 39263, lemma for The Main Theorem of Equivalences mainer 39283. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ElDisj 𝐴)
Theorem	disjimeldisjdmqs 39268	Disj implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Supplies the carrier-disjointness half of the Disjs pattern: under Disj 𝑅, the coset family is element-disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅))
Theorem	eldisjsim1 39269	An element of the class of disjoint relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → Disj 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjsim2 39270	An element of the class of disjoint relations is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → 𝑅 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	disjsssrels 39271	The class of disjoint relations is a subclass of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs ⊆ Rels
Theorem	eldisjsim3 39272	Disjs implies element-disjoint quotient carrier. Exports the carrier-disjointness property in the ElDisjs packaging. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim4 39273	Disjs implies element-disjoint range of QMap. Same as eldisjsim3 39272 but expressed using the block-map range ran QMap 𝑅 (often the more modular expression). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs )
Theorem	eldisjsim5 39274	Disjs is closed under QMap. If a relation is "disjoint-structured" (Disjs), then its canonical block map is also "disjoint-structured". This is the second "structure level" in Disjs: it expresses that the property is stable under passing to the canonical block map, a theme that mirrors Pet-grade stability at a different axis. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs → QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )
Theorem	eldisjs6 39275	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. A relation 𝑅 is in Disjs iff: it is relation-typed, and its quotient-map QMap 𝑅 is itself disjoint, and its quotient-carrier ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) lies in ElDisjs (element-disjoint carriers). This is the central "stability-by-decomposition" theorem for Disjs: it explains why Disjs is internally well-behaved without adding an external stability clause. It is the exact template that PetParts imitates: for pet 39300, the analogue of "map layer" is the disjointness of the lifted span, the analogue of "carrier layer" is the block-lift fixpoint (BlockLiftFix), and then adds external grade stability (SucMap ShiftStable) which Disjs does not need. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs )))
Theorem	eldisjs7 39276*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. 𝑅 ∈ Disjs iff: 𝑅 ∈ Rels, and every 𝑥 belongs to at most one block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) (element-disjointness at the carrier), and every block 𝑢 in the quotient-carrier has a unique representative 𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 such that 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅. Provides the "fully expanded" quantifier characterization of the same decomposition as eldisjs6 39275, but without explicitly mentioning QMap. This is the "E*/E!"" view that is closest in spirit to suc11reg 9531-style injectivity and to the "unique generator per block" narrative. It is also the right contrast-point to older one-line criteria like dfdisjs4 39131 (the "u R x" style), because it makes the carrier and representation discipline explicit and type-safe. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rels ∧ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅)))
Theorem	dfdisjs6 39277	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via quotient-map stability). Disjs is the class of relations 𝑟 whose quotient-map QMap 𝑟 is again disjoint and whose induced quotient-carrier is element-disjoint. This is the definitional "stability-by-decomposition" packaging of disjointness: it builds Disjs from two internal layers (i) a carrier-layer constraint and (ii) a map-layer closure constraint. This is deliberately different from "u R x" style definitions: it makes the carrier of blocks and the uniqueness-of-representatives discipline first-class and reusable (via QMap) rather than implicit. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (ran QMap 𝑟 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ QMap 𝑟 ∈ Disjs )}
Theorem	dfdisjs7 39278*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints (via carrier disjointness + unique representatives). Ideology-free normal form of dfdisjs6 39277: "blocks cover their elements" (∃*) and "each block has a unique generator" (∃!), expressed entirely at the quotient-carrier level. Same class as dfdisjs6 39277, but presented in fully expanded ∃* / ∃! form over the quotient-carrier (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟). Makes explicit (a) element-disjointness of the quotient-carrier and (b) unique representative existence for each block. These are exactly the two conditions that rule out type-confusions (blocks vs witnesses) and ensure canonical decomposition. This is the form that best supports analogy arguments with df-petparts 39303 and with successor-style uniqueness patterns. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑟 / 𝑟)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑟 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑟)}
Theorem	fences3 39279	Implication of eqvrelqseqdisj2 39267 and n0eldmqseq 39069, see comment of fences 39293. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj3 39280	Implication of eqvreldisj3 39264, lemma for the Member Partition Equivalence Theorem mpet3 39285. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj4 39281	Lemma for petincnvepres2 39297. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (𝑆 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	eqvrelqseqdisj5 39282	Lemma for the Partition-Equivalence Theorem pet2 39299. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) → Disj (𝑆 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mainer 39283	The Main Theorem of Equivalences: every equivalence relation implies equivalent comembers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	partimcomember 39284	Partition with general 𝑅 (in addition to the member partition cf. mpet 39288 and mpet2 39289) implies equivalent comembers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	mpet3 39285	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. Together with mpet 39288 mpet2 39289, mostly in its conventional cpet 39287 and cpet2 39286 form, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39299 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	cpet2 39286	The conventional form of the Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. In the conventional case there is no (general) disjoint and no (general) partition concept: mathematicians have called disjoint or partition what we call element disjoint or member partition, see also cpet 39287. Together with cpet 39287, mpet 39288 mpet2 39289, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39299 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	cpet 39287	The conventional form of Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. In the conventional case there is no (general) disjoint and no (general) partition concept: mathematicians have been calling disjoint or partition what we call element disjoint or member partition, see also cpet2 39286. Cf. mpet 39288, mpet2 39289 and mpet3 39285 for unconventional forms of Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem. Cf. pet 39300 and pet2 39299 for Partition-Equivalence Theorem with general 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( EqvRel ∼ 𝐴 ∧ (∪ 𝐴 / ∼ 𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	mpet 39288	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in almost its shortest possible form, cf. the 0-ary version mpets 39291. Member partition and comember equivalence relation are the same (or: each element of 𝐴 have equivalent comembers if and only if 𝐴 is a member partition). Together with mpet2 39289, mpet3 39285, and with the conventional cpet 39287 and cpet2 39286, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39299 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ CoMembEr 𝐴)
Theorem	mpet2 39289	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in a shorter form. Together with mpet 39288 mpet3 39285, mostly in its conventional cpet 39287 and cpet2 39286 form, this is what we used to think of as the partition equivalence theorem (but cf. pet2 39299 with general 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	mpets2 39290	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem with binary relations, cf. mpet2 39289. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Parts 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Ers 𝐴))
Theorem	mpets 39291	Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem in its shortest possible form: it shows that member partitions and comember equivalence relations are literally the same. Cf. pet 39300, the Partition-Equivalence Theorem, with general 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ MembParts = CoMembErs
Theorem	mainpart 39292	Partition with general 𝑅 also imply member partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 → MembPart 𝐴)
Theorem	fences 39293	The Theorem of Fences by Equivalences: all conceivable equivalence relations (besides the comember equivalence relation cf. mpet 39288) generate a partition of the members. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → MembPart 𝐴)
Theorem	fences2 39294	The Theorem of Fences by Equivalences: all conceivable equivalence relations (besides the comember equivalence relation cf. mpet3 39285) generate a partition of the members, it alo means that (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → ElDisj 𝐴) and that (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	mainer2 39295	The Main Theorem of Equivalences: every equivalence relation implies equivalent comembers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → ( CoElEqvRel 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	mainerim 39296	Every equivalence relation implies equivalent coelements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴 → CoElEqvRel 𝐴)
Theorem	petincnvepres2 39297	A partition-equivalence theorem with intersection and general 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	petincnvepres 39298	The shortest form of a partition-equivalence theorem with intersection and general 𝑅. Cf. br1cossincnvepres 38875. Cf. pet 39300. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)
Theorem	pet2 39299	Partition-Equivalence Theorem, with general 𝑅. This theorem (together with pet 39300 and pets 39301) is the main result of my investigation into set theory, see the comment of pet 39300. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴) ↔ ( EqvRel ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ (dom ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pet 39300	Partition-Equivalence Theorem with general 𝑅 while preserving the restricted converse epsilon relation of mpet2 39289 (as opposed to petincnvepres 39298). A class is a partition by a range Cartesian product with general 𝑅 and the restricted converse element class if and only if the cosets by the range Cartesian product are in an equivalence relation on it. Cf. br1cossxrncnvepres 38877. This theorem (together with pets 39301 and pet2 39299) is the main result of my investigation into set theory. It is no more general than the conventional Member Partition-Equivalence Theorem mpet 39288, mpet2 39289 and mpet3 39285 (because you cannot set 𝑅 in this theorem in such a way that you get mpet2 39289), i.e., it is not the hypothetical General Partition-Equivalence Theorem gpet ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ErALTV 𝐴), but this one has a general part that mpet2 39289 lacks: 𝑅, which is sufficient for my future application of set theory, for my purpose outside of set theory. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) Part 𝐴 ↔ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ErALTV 𝐴)