P. 393 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39201-39300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	omllaw3 39201	Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31468 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw4 39202	Orthomodular law equivalent. Remark in [Holland95] p. 223. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	omllaw5N 39203	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml5 31645 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cmtcomlemN 39204	Lemma for cmtcomN 39205. (cmcmlem 31623 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 → 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmtcomN 39205	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (cmcmi 31624 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmt2N 39206	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (cmcm2i 31625 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmt3N 39207	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31627 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmt4N 39208	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31627 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr2N 39209	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr2i 31628 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))))
Theorem	cmtbr3N 39210	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr3 31640 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr4N 39211	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (cmbr4i 31633 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	lecmtN 39212	Ordered elements commute. (lecmi 31634 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmtidN 39213	Any element commutes with itself. (cmidi 31642 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	omlfh1N 39214	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 1. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Part of Theorem 5 in [Kalmbach] p. 25. (fh1 31650 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlfh3N 39215	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 3. Dual of omlfh1N 39214. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlmod1i2N 39216	Analogue of modular law atmod1i2 39816 that holds in any OML. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	omlspjN 39217	Contraction of a Sasaki projection. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋)
21.28.10  Atomic lattices with covering property
Syntax	ccvr 39218	Extend class notation with covers relation.
class ⋖
Syntax	catm 39219	Extend class notation with atoms.
class Atoms
Syntax	cal 39220	Extend class notation with atomic lattices.
class AtLat
Syntax	clc 39221	Extend class notation with lattices with the covering property.
class CvLat
Definition	df-covers 39222*	Define the covers relation ("is covered by") for posets. "𝑎 is covered by 𝑏 " means that 𝑎 is strictly less than 𝑏 and there is nothing in between. See cvrval 39225 for the relation form. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ⋖ = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑏 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑧 ∧ 𝑧(lt‘𝑝)𝑏))})
Definition	df-ats 39223*	Define the class of poset atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Atoms = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑎})
Theorem	cvrfval 39224*	Value of covers relation "is covered by". (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	cvrval 39225*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (cvbr 32314 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrlt 39226	The covers relation implies the less-than relation. (cvpss 32317 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 < 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn 39227	There is no element between the two arguments of the covers relation. (cvnbtwn 32318 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ (𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌))
Theorem	ncvr1 39228	No element covers the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 1 𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrletrN 39229	Property of an element above a covering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrval2 39230*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (cvbr2 32315 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 = 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn2 39231	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 32319 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn3 39232	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 32320 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrcon3b 39233	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (cvcon3 32316 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrle 39234	The covers relation implies the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn4 39235	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvnbtwn4 32321 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrnle 39236	The covers relation implies the negation of the converse "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	cvrne 39237	The covers relation implies inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnrefN 39238	The covers relation is not reflexive. (cvnref 32323 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrcmp 39239	If two lattice elements that cover a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍𝐶𝑋 ∧ 𝑍𝐶𝑌)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrcmp2 39240	If two lattice elements covered by a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	pats 39241*	The set of atoms in a poset. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
Theorem	isat 39242	The predicate "is an atom". (ela 32371 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 𝐶𝑃)))
Theorem	isat2 39243	The predicate "is an atom". (elatcv0 32373 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑃))
Theorem	atcvr0 39244	An atom covers zero. (atcv0 32374 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 𝐶𝑃)
Theorem	atbase 39245	An atom is a member of the lattice base set (i.e. a lattice element). (atelch 32376 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atssbase 39246	The set of atoms is a subset of the base set. (atssch 32375 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	0ltat 39247	An atom is greater than zero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 < 𝑃)
Theorem	leatb 39248	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (atss 32378 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑃 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 )))
Theorem	leat 39249	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	leat2 39250	A nonzero poset element less than or equal to an atom equals the atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃)) → 𝑋 = 𝑃)
Theorem	leat3 39251	A poset element less than or equal to an atom is either an atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat 39252	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat2 39253	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Definition	df-atl 39254*	Define the class of atomic lattices, in which every nonzero element is greater than or equal to an atom. We also ensure the existence of a lattice zero, since a lattice by itself may not have a zero. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑝(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
Theorem	isatl 39255*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	atllat 39256	An atomic lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	atlpos 39257	An atomic lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	atl0dm 39258	Condition necessary for zero element to exist. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	atl0cl 39259	An atomic lattice has a zero element. We can use this in place of op0cl 39140 for lattices without orthocomplements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 0 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atl0le 39260	Orthoposet zero is less than or equal to any element. (ch0le 31473 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlle0 39261	An element less than or equal to zero equals zero. (chle0 31475 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 0 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atlltn0 39262	A lattice element greater than zero is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 < 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ))
Theorem	isat3 39263*	The predicate "is an atom". (elat2 32372 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑃 → (𝑥 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑥 = 0 )))))
Theorem	atn0 39264	An atom is not zero. (atne0 32377 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atnle0 39265	An atom is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 0 )
Theorem	atlen0 39266	A lattice element is nonzero if an atom is under it. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atcmp 39267	If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 32379 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	atncmp 39268	Frequently-used variation of atcmp 39267. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atnlt 39269	Two atoms cannot satisfy the less than relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 < 𝑄)
Theorem	atcvreq0 39270	An element covered by an atom must be zero. (atcveq0 32380 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝐶𝑃 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atncvrN 39271	Two atoms cannot satisfy the covering relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃𝐶𝑄)
Theorem	atlex 39272*	Every nonzero element of an atomic lattice is greater than or equal to an atom. (hatomic 32392 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atnle 39273	Two ways of expressing "an atom is not less than or equal to a lattice element." (atnssm0 32408 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ))
Theorem	atnem0 39274	The meet of distinct atoms is zero. (atnemeq0 32409 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑄) = 0 ))
Theorem	atlatmstc 39275*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32394 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	atlatle 39276*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32403 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atlrelat1 39277*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32395, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Definition	df-cvlat 39278*	Define the class of atomic lattices with the covering property. (This is actually the exchange property, but they are equivalent. The literature usually uses the covering property terminology.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ CvLat = {𝑘 ∈ AtLat ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑏 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)((¬ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)𝑐 ∧ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑏)) → 𝑏(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑎))}
Theorem	iscvlat 39279*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	iscvlat2N 39280*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑝 ∧ 𝑥) = 0 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	cvlatl 39281	An atomic lattice with the covering property is an atomic lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ AtLat)
Theorem	cvllat 39282	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	cvlposN 39283	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	cvlexch1 39284	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch2 39285	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexchb1 39286	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlexchb2 39287	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexch3 39288	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32413 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch4N 39289	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb1 39290	A version of cvlexchb1 39286 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb2 39291	A version of cvlexchb2 39287 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlatexch1 39292	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlatexch2 39293	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlatexch3 39294	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅)) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlcvr1 39295	The covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32387 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlcvrp 39296	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32407 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlatcvr1 39297	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatcvr2 39298	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlsupr2 39299	Two equivalent ways of expressing that 𝑅 is a superposition of 𝑃 and 𝑄. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	cvlsupr3 39300	Two equivalent ways of expressing that 𝑅 is a superposition of 𝑃 and 𝑄, which can replace the superposition part of ishlat1 39308, (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴(𝑧 ≠ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ), with the simpler ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) as shown in ishlat3N 39310. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))))