P. 202 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 20101-20200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abv1z 20101	The absolute value of one is one in a non-trivial ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → (𝐹‘ 1 ) = 1)
Theorem	abv1 20102	The absolute value of one is one in a division ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘ 1 ) = 1)
Theorem	abvneg 20103	The absolute value of a negative is the same as that of the positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑁‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋))
Theorem	abvsubtri 20104	An absolute value satisfies the triangle inequality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 − 𝑌)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	abvrec 20105	The absolute value distributes under reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝐼‘𝑋)) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑋)))
Theorem	abvdiv 20106	The absolute value distributes under division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 / 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) / (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	abvdom 20107	Any ring with an absolute value is a domain, which is to say that it contains no zero divisors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	abvres 20108	The restriction of an absolute value to a subring is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (AbsVal‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	abvtrivd 20109*	The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1))    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑦 · 𝑧) ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abvtriv 20110*	The trivial absolute value. (This theorem is true as long as 𝑅 is a domain, but it is not true for rings with zero divisors, which violate the multiplication axiom; abvdom 20107 is the converse of this remark.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	abvpropd 20111*	If two structures have the same ring components, they have the same collection of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿))
10.4.4  Star rings
Syntax	cstf 20112	Extend class notation with the functionalization of the *-ring involution.
class *rf
Syntax	csr 20113	Extend class notation with class of all *-rings.
class *-Ring
Definition	df-staf 20114*	Define the functionalization of the involution in a star ring. This is not strictly necessary but by having *𝑟 as an actual function we can state the principal properties of an involution much more cleanly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ *rf = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ ((*𝑟‘𝑓)‘𝑥)))
Definition	df-srng 20115*	Define class of all star rings. A star ring is a ring with an involution (conjugation) function. Involution (unlike say the ring zero) is not unique and therefore must be added as a new component to the ring. For example, two possible involutions for complex numbers are the identity function and complex conjugation. Definition of involution in [Holland95] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ *-Ring = {𝑓 ∣ [(*rf‘𝑓) / 𝑖](𝑖 ∈ (𝑓 RingHom (oppr‘𝑓)) ∧ 𝑖 = ◡𝑖)}
Theorem	staffval 20116*	The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( ∗ ‘𝑥))
Theorem	stafval 20117	The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ( ∙ ‘𝐴) = ( ∗ ‘𝐴))
Theorem	staffn 20118	The functionalization is equal to the original function, if it is a function on the right base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ( ∗ Fn 𝐵 → ∙ = ∗ )
Theorem	issrng 20119	The predicate "is a star ring". (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ↔ ( ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂) ∧ ∗ = ◡ ∗ ))
Theorem	srngrhm 20120	The involution function in a star ring is an antiautomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂))
Theorem	srngring 20121	A star ring is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
Theorem	srngcnv 20122	The involution function in a star ring is its own inverse function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ = ◡ ∗ )
Theorem	srngf1o 20123	The involution function in a star ring is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ :𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	srngcl 20124	The involution function in a star ring is closed in the ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	srngnvl 20125	The involution function in a star ring is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	srngadd 20126	The involution function in a star ring distributes over addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑋) + ( ∗ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	srngmul 20127	The involution function in a star ring distributes over multiplication, with a change in the order of the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑌) · ( ∗ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	srng1 20128	The conjugate of the ring identity is the identity. (This is sometimes taken as an axiom, and indeed the proof here follows because we defined *𝑟 to be a ring homomorphism, which preserves 1; nevertheless, it is redundant, as can be seen from the proof of issrngd 20130.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 1 ) = 1 )
Theorem	srng0 20129	The conjugate of the ring zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	issrngd 20130*	Properties that determine a star ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑥) + ( ∗ ‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑦) · ( ∗ ‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring)
Theorem	idsrngd 20131*	A commutative ring is a star ring when the conjugate operation is the identity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring)
10.5  Left modules
10.5.1  Definition and basic properties
Syntax	clmod 20132	Extend class notation with class of all left modules.
class LMod
Syntax	cscaf 20133	The functionalization of the scalar multiplication operation.
class ·sf
Definition	df-lmod 20134*	Define the class of all left modules, which are generalizations of left vector spaces. A left module over a ring is an (Abelian) group (vectors) together with a ring (scalars) and a left scalar product connecting them. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ LMod = {𝑔 ∈ Grp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑎][(Scalar‘𝑔) / 𝑓][( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔) / 𝑠][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘][(+g‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(.r‘𝑓) / 𝑡](𝑓 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (((𝑟𝑠𝑤) ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (𝑟𝑠(𝑤𝑎𝑥)) = ((𝑟𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞𝑝𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = ((𝑞𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞𝑡𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = (𝑞𝑠(𝑟𝑠𝑤)) ∧ ((1r‘𝑓)𝑠𝑤) = 𝑤)))}
Definition	df-scaf 20135*	Define the functionalization of the ·𝑠 operator. This restricts the value of ·𝑠 to the stated domain, which is necessary when working with restricted structures, whose operations may be defined on a larger set than the true base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ·sf = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑔)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔)𝑦)))
Theorem	islmod 20136*	The predicate "is a left module". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑟 · 𝑤) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑟 · (𝑤 + 𝑥)) = ((𝑟 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟) · 𝑤) = ((𝑞 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞 × 𝑟) · 𝑤) = (𝑞 · (𝑟 · 𝑤)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑤) = 𝑤))))
Theorem	lmodlema 20137	Lemma for properties of a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑌 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑌) = ((𝑄 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑌) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑌)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑌) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	islmodd 20138*	Properties that determine a left module. See note in isgrpd2 18608 regarding the 𝜑 on hypotheses that name structure components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (1r‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 ⨣ 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 × 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑥) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)
Theorem	lmodgrp 20139	A left module is a group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	lmodring 20140	The scalar component of a left module is a ring. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Ring)
Theorem	lmodfgrp 20141	The scalar component of a left module is an additive group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	lmodbn0 20142	The base set of a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	lmodacl 20143	Closure of ring addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾)
Theorem	lmodmcl 20144	Closure of ring multiplication for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾)
Theorem	lmodsn0 20145	The set of scalars in a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	lmodvacl 20146	Closure of vector addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	lmodass 20147	Left module vector sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	lmodlcan 20148	Left cancellation law for vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑍 + 𝑋) = (𝑍 + 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	lmodvscl 20149	Closure of scalar product for a left module. (hvmulcl 29384 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	scaffval 20150*	The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦))
Theorem	scafval 20151	The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∙ 𝑌) = (𝑋 · 𝑌))
Theorem	scafeq 20152	If the scalar multiplication operation is already a function, the functionalization of it is equal to the original operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ( · Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) → ∙ = · )
Theorem	scaffn 20153	The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ∙ Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵)
Theorem	lmodscaf 20154	The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → ∙ :(𝐾 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵)
Theorem	lmodvsdi 20155	Distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 29379 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	lmodvsdir 20156	Distributive law for scalar product (right-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 29379 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
Theorem	lmodvsass 20157	Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 29378 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋)))
Theorem	lmod0cl 20158	The ring zero in a left module belongs to the ring base set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝐾)
Theorem	lmod1cl 20159	The ring unit in a left module belongs to the ring base set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 1 ∈ 𝐾)
Theorem	lmodvs1 20160	Scalar product with ring unit. (ax-hvmulid 29377 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	lmod0vcl 20161	The zero vector is a vector. (ax-hv0cl 29374 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	lmod0vlid 20162	Left identity law for the zero vector. (hvaddid2 29394 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	lmod0vrid 20163	Right identity law for the zero vector. (ax-hvaddid 29375 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋)
Theorem	lmod0vid 20164	Identity equivalent to the value of the zero vector. Provides a convenient way to compute the value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋 ↔ 0 = 𝑋))
Theorem	lmod0vs 20165	Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 29381 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	lmodvs0 20166	Anything times the zero vector is the zero vector. Equation 1b of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (hvmul0 29395 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 )
Theorem	lmodvsmmulgdi 20167	Distributive law for a group multiple of a scalar multiplication. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑁 ↑ (𝐶 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝐶) · 𝑋))
Theorem	lmodfopnelem1 20168	Lemma 1 for lmodfopne 20170. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.)
⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → 𝑉 = 𝐾)
Theorem	lmodfopnelem2 20169	Lemma 2 for lmodfopne 20170. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.)
⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → ( 0 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	lmodfopne 20170	The (functionalized) operations of a left module (over a nonzero ring) cannot be identical. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) (Revised by AV, 2-Oct-2021.)
⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → + ≠ · )
Theorem	lcomf 20171	A linear-combination sum is a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻):𝐼⟶𝐵)
Theorem	lcomfsupp 20172	A linear-combination sum is finitely supported if the coefficients are. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻) finSupp 0 )
Theorem	lmodvnegcl 20173	Closure of vector negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	lmodvnegid 20174	Addition of a vector with its negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + (𝑁‘𝑋)) = 0 )
Theorem	lmodvneg1 20175	Minus 1 times a vector is the negative of the vector. Equation 2 of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑀‘ 1 ) · 𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋))
Theorem	lmodvsneg 20176	Multiplication of a vector by a negated scalar. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑅 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑅) · 𝑋))
Theorem	lmodvsubcl 20177	Closure of vector subtraction. (hvsubcl 29388 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	lmodcom 20178	Left module vector sum is commutative. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	lmodabl 20179	A left module is an abelian group (of vectors, under addition). (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Abel)
Theorem	lmodcmn 20180	A left module is a commutative monoid under addition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ CMnd)
Theorem	lmodnegadd 20181	Distribute negation through addition of scalar products. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘((𝐴 · 𝑋) + (𝐵 · 𝑌))) = (((𝐼‘𝐴) · 𝑋) + ((𝐼‘𝐵) · 𝑌)))
Theorem	lmod4 20182	Commutative/associative law for left module vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑈)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑈)))
Theorem	lmodvsubadd 20183	Relationship between vector subtraction and addition. (hvsubadd 29448 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	lmodvaddsub4 20184	Vector addition/subtraction law. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐶 + 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	lmodvpncan 20185	Addition/subtraction cancellation law for vectors. (hvpncan 29410 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmodvnpcan 20186	Cancellation law for vector subtraction (npcan 11239 analog). (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmodvsubval2 20187	Value of vector subtraction in terms of addition. (hvsubval 29387 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 + ((𝑁‘ 1 ) · 𝐵)))
Theorem	lmodsubvs 20188	Subtraction of a scalar product in terms of addition. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − (𝐴 · 𝑌)) = (𝑋 + ((𝑁‘𝐴) · 𝑌)))
Theorem	lmodsubdi 20189	Scalar multiplication distributive law for subtraction. (hvsubdistr1 29420 analogue, with longer proof since our scalar multiplication is not commutative.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝑋 − 𝑌)) = ((𝐴 · 𝑋) − (𝐴 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	lmodsubdir 20190	Scalar multiplication distributive law for subtraction. (hvsubdistr2 29421 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (-g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝑆𝐵) · 𝑋) = ((𝐴 · 𝑋) − (𝐵 · 𝑋)))
Theorem	lmodsubeq0 20191	If the difference between two vectors is zero, they are equal. (hvsubeq0 29439 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = 0 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	lmodsubid 20192	Subtraction of a vector from itself. (hvsubid 29397 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 − 𝐴) = 0 )
Theorem	lmodvsghm 20193*	Scalar multiplication of the vector space by a fixed scalar is an endomorphism of the additive group of vectors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑅 · 𝑥)) ∈ (𝑊 GrpHom 𝑊))
Theorem	lmodprop2d 20194*	If two structures have the same components (properties), one is a left module iff the other one is. This version of lmodpropd 20195 also breaks up the components of the scalar ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐹)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐹)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐺)𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ LMod ↔ 𝐿 ∈ LMod))
Theorem	lmodpropd 20195*	If two structures have the same components (properties), one is a left module iff the other one is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ LMod ↔ 𝐿 ∈ LMod))
Theorem	gsumvsmul 20196*	Pull a scalar multiplication out of a sum of vectors. This theorem properly generalizes gsummulc2 19855, since every ring is a left module over itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑌) finSupp 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑋 · 𝑌))) = (𝑋 · (𝑅 Σg (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑌))))
Theorem	mptscmfsupp0 20197*	A mapping to a scalar product is finitely supported if the mapping to the scalar is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 5-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∗ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑆) finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑆 ∗ 𝑊)) finSupp 0 )
Theorem	mptscmfsuppd 20198*	A function mapping to a scalar product in which one factor is finitely supported is finitely supported. Formerly part of proof for ply1coe 21476. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Aug-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 finSupp (0g‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑘) · 𝑍)) finSupp (0g‘𝑃))
Theorem	rmodislmodlem 20199*	Lemma for rmodislmod 20200. This is the part of the proof of rmodislmod 20200 which requires the scalar ring to be commutative. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑤 · 𝑟) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ((𝑤 + 𝑥) · 𝑟) = ((𝑤 · 𝑟) + (𝑥 · 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑤 · (𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) + (𝑤 · 𝑟))) ∧ ((𝑤 · (𝑞 × 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) · 𝑟) ∧ (𝑤 · 1 ) = 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ ∗ = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑣 · 𝑠))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 sSet ⟨( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), ∗ ⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ CRing ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑎 × 𝑏) ∗ 𝑐) = (𝑎 ∗ (𝑏 ∗ 𝑐)))
Theorem	rmodislmod 20200*	The right module 𝑅 induces a left module 𝐿 by replacing the scalar multiplication with a reversed multiplication if the scalar ring is commutative. The hypothesis "rmodislmod.r" is a definition of a right module analogous to Definition df-lmod 20134 of a left module, see also islmod 20136. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑤 · 𝑟) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ((𝑤 + 𝑥) · 𝑟) = ((𝑤 · 𝑟) + (𝑥 · 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑤 · (𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) + (𝑤 · 𝑟))) ∧ ((𝑤 · (𝑞 × 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) · 𝑟) ∧ (𝑤 · 1 ) = 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ ∗ = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑣 · 𝑠))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑅 sSet ⟨( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), ∗ ⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ CRing → 𝐿 ∈ LMod)