P. 402 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40101-40200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nzprmdif 40101	Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)})))
Theorem	hashnzfz 40102	Special case of hashdvds 15967: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁))))
Theorem	hashnzfz2 40103	Special case of hashnzfz 40102: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)))
Theorem	hashnzfzclim 40104*	As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 40102 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀))
20.32.4  Function operations
Theorem	caofcan 40105*	Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11077 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))
Theorem	ofsubid 40106	Function analogue of subid 10705. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0}))
Theorem	ofmul12 40107	Function analogue of mul12 10604. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · (𝐺 ∘𝑓 · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘𝑓 · (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐻)))
Theorem	ofdivrec 40108	Function analogue of divrec 11114, a division analogue of ofnegsub 11436. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘𝑓 / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 / 𝐺))
Theorem	ofdivcan4 40109	Function analogue of divcan4 11125. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) ∘𝑓 / 𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	ofdivdiv2 40110	Function analogue of divdiv2 11152. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 / (𝐺 ∘𝑓 / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐻) ∘𝑓 / 𝐺))
20.32.5  Calculus
Theorem	lhe4.4ex1a 40111	Example of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, part two (ftc2 24360): ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3). Section 4.4 example 1a of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 311. (The book teaches ftc2 24360 as simply the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", then ftc1 24358 as the "Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus".) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Steve Rodriguez, 31-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3)
Theorem	dvsconst 40112	Derivative of a constant function on the real or complex numbers. The function may return a complex 𝐴 even if 𝑆 is ℝ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑆 D (𝑆 × {𝐴})) = (𝑆 × {0}))
Theorem	dvsid 40113	Derivative of the identity function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D ( I ↾ 𝑆)) = (𝑆 × {1}))
Theorem	dvsef 40114	Derivative of the exponential function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 12-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D (exp ↾ 𝑆)) = (exp ↾ 𝑆))
Theorem	expgrowthi 40115*	Exponential growth and decay model. See expgrowth 40117 for more information. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘𝑓 · 𝑌))
Theorem	dvconstbi 40116*	The derivative of a function on 𝑆 is zero iff it is a constant function. Roughly a biconditional 𝑆 analogue of dvconst 24233 and dveq0 24316. Corresponds to integration formula "∫0 d𝑥 = 𝐶 " in section 4.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 278. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = (𝑆 × {0}) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑆 × {𝑐})))
Theorem	expgrowth 40117*	Exponential growth and decay model. The derivative of a function y of variable t equals a constant k times y itself, iff y equals some constant C times the exponential of kt. This theorem and expgrowthi 40115 illustrate one of the simplest and most crucial classes of differential equations, equations that relate functions to their derivatives. Section 6.3 of [Strang] p. 242 calls y' = ky "the most important differential equation in applied mathematics". In the field of population ecology it is known as the Malthusian growth model or exponential law, and C, k, and t correspond to initial population size, growth rate, and time respectively (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusian_growth_model); and in finance, the model appears in a similar role in continuous compounding with C as the initial amount of money. In exponential decay models, k is often expressed as the negative of a positive constant λ. Here y' is given as (𝑆 D 𝑌), C as 𝑐, and ky as ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘𝑓 · 𝑌). (𝑆 × {𝐾}) is the constant function that maps any real or complex input to k and ∘𝑓 · is multiplication as a function operation. The leftward direction of the biconditional is as given in http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MA221-2.1.1.pdf pp. 1-2, which also notes the reverse direction ("While we will not prove this here, it turns out that these are the only functions that satisfy this equation."). The rightward direction is Theorem 5.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 375 (which notes " C is the initial value of y, and k is the proportionality constant. Exponential growth occurs when k > 0, and exponential decay occurs when k < 0."); its proof here closely follows the proof of y' = y in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Growth_Equation/Special_Case. Statements for this and expgrowthi 40115 formulated by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘𝑓 · 𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝑐 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡))))))
20.32.6  The generalized binomial coefficient operation
Syntax	cbcc 40118	Extend class notation to include the generalized binomial coefficient operation.
class C𝑐
Definition	df-bcc 40119*	Define a generalized binomial coefficient operation, which unlike df-bc 13477 allows complex numbers for the first argument. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ C𝑐 = (𝑐 ∈ ℂ, 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑐 FallFac 𝑘) / (!‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bccval 40120	Value of the generalized binomial coefficient, 𝐶 choose 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = ((𝐶 FallFac 𝐾) / (!‘𝐾)))
Theorem	bcccl 40121	Closure of the generalized binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	bcc0 40122	The generalized binomial coefficient 𝐶 choose 𝐾 is zero iff 𝐶 is an integer between zero and (𝐾 − 1) inclusive. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = 0 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))))
Theorem	bccp1k 40123	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 + 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) · ((𝐶 − 𝐾) / (𝐾 + 1))))
Theorem	bccm1k 40124	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 − 1), when 𝐶 is not (𝐾 − 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {(𝐾 − 1)}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) / ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) / 𝐾)))
Theorem	bccn0 40125	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 0. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐0) = 1)
Theorem	bccn1 40126	Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 1. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐1) = 𝐶)
Theorem	bccbc 40127	The binomial coefficient and generalized binomial coefficient are equal when their arguments are nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝑐𝐾) = (𝑁C𝐾))
20.32.7  Binomial series
Theorem	uzmptshftfval 40128*	When 𝐹 is a maps-to function on some set of upper integers 𝑍 that returns a set 𝐵, (𝐹 shift 𝑁) is another maps-to function on the shifted set of upper integers 𝑊. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 − 𝑁) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 shift 𝑁) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	dvradcnv2 40129*	The radius of convergence of the (formal) derivative 𝐻 of the power series 𝐺 is (at least) as large as the radius of convergence of 𝐺. This version of dvradcnv 24728 uses a shifted version of 𝐻 to match the sum form of (ℂ D 𝐹) in pserdv2 24737 (and shows how to use uzmptshftfval 40128 to shift a maps-to function on a set of upper integers). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑛 · (𝐴‘𝑛)) · (𝑋↑(𝑛 − 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝑋) < 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐻) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	binomcxplemwb 40130	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. The lemma in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 − 𝐾) · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)) + ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) · (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)))) = (𝐶 · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnn0 40131*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. When 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer, the binomial's finite sum value by the standard binomial theorem binom 15044 equals this generalized infinite sum: the generalized binomial coefficient and exponentiation operators give exactly the same values in the standard index set (0...𝐶), and when the index set is widened beyond 𝐶 the additional values are just zeroes. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxplemrat 40132*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. As 𝑘 increases, this ratio's absolute value converges to one. Part of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof (proven for the inverse ratio, which we later show is no problem). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐶 − 𝑘) / (𝑘 + 1)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemfrat 40133*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. binomcxplemrat 40132 implies that when 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the absolute value of the ratio ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)) converges to one. The rest of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)))) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemradcnv 40134*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. By binomcxplemfrat 40133 and radcnvrat 40096 the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)) is one. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑅 = 1)
Theorem	binomcxplemdvbinom 40135*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. By the power and chain rules, calculate the derivative of ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶), with respect to 𝑏 in the disk of convergence 𝐷. We later multiply the derivative in the later binomcxplemdvsum 40137 by this derivative to show that ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) (with a non-negated 𝐶) and the later sum, since both at 𝑏 = 0 equal one, are the same. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (ℂ D (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶))) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (-𝐶 · ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐(-𝐶 − 1)))))
Theorem	binomcxplemcvg 40136*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. The sum in binomcxplemnn0 40131 and its derivative (see the next theorem, binomcxplemdvsum 40137) converge, as long as their base 𝐽 is within the disk of convergence. Part of remark "This convergence allows us to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) → (seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ seq1( + , (𝐸‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	binomcxplemdvsum 40137*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. The derivative of the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 40131. Part of remark "This convergence allows us to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D 𝑃) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐸‘𝑏)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	binomcxplemnotnn0 40138*	Lemma for binomcxp 40139. When 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 40131 —which we will call 𝑃 —is a convergent power series: its base 𝑏 is always of smaller absolute value than the radius of convergence. pserdv2 24737 gives the derivative of 𝑃, which by dvradcnv 24728 also converges in that radius. When 𝐴 is fixed at one, (𝐴 + 𝑏) times that derivative equals (𝐶 · 𝑃) and fraction (𝑃 / ((𝐴 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶)) is always defined with derivative zero, so the fraction is a constant—specifically one, because ((1 + 0)↑𝑐𝐶) = 1. Thus ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) = (𝑃‘𝑏). Finally, let 𝑏 be (𝐵 / 𝐴), and multiply both the binomial ((1 + (𝐵 / 𝐴))↑𝑐𝐶) and the sum (𝑃‘(𝐵 / 𝐴)) by (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) to get the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
Theorem	binomcxp 40139*	Generalize the binomial theorem binom 15044 to positive real summand 𝐴, real summand 𝐵, and complex exponent 𝐶. Proof in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Advanced_Calculus; see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem (sections "Newton's generalized binomial theorem" and "Future generalizations"), and proof "General Binomial Theorem" in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘))))
20.33  Mathbox for Andrew Salmon
20.33.1  Principia Mathematica * 10
Theorem	pm10.12 40140*	Theorem *10.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. In *10, this is treated as an axiom, and the proofs in *10 are based on this theorem. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.14 40141	Theorem *10.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.251 40142	Theorem *10.251 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.252 40143	Theorem *10.252 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm10.253 40144	Theorem *10.253 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	albitr 40145	Theorem *10.301 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 151. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.42 40146	Theorem *10.42 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.52 40147*	Theorem *10.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.53 40148	Theorem *10.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm10.541 40149*	Theorem *10.541 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.542 40150*	Theorem *10.542 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.55 40151	Theorem *10.55 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm10.56 40152	Theorem *10.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm10.57 40153	Theorem *10.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
20.33.2  Principia Mathematica * 11
Theorem	2alanimi 40154	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)
Theorem	2al2imi 40155	Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	pm11.11 40156	Theorem *11.11 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧∀𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑
Theorem	pm11.12 40157*	Theorem *11.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.21vv 40158*	Compare Theorem *11.3 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 161. Special case of theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two quantifiers. See 19.21v 1899. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	2alim 40159	Theorem *11.32 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2albi 40160	Theorem *11.33 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2exim 40161	Theorem *11.34 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	2exbi 40162	Theorem *11.341 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	spsbce-2 40163	Theorem *11.36 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	19.33-2 40164	Theorem *11.421 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.33 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.36vv 40165*	Theorem *11.43 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	19.31vv 40166*	Theorem *11.44 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.31 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.37vv 40167*	Theorem *11.46 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	19.28vv 40168*	Theorem *11.47 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.52 40169	Theorem *11.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	2exanali 40170	Theorem *11.521 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	aaanv 40171*	Theorem *11.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. Special case of aaan 2274. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.57 40172*	Theorem *11.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.58 40173*	Theorem *11.58 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	pm11.59 40174*	Theorem *11.59 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → (𝜓 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	pm11.6 40175*	Theorem *11.6 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.61 40176*	Theorem *11.61 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.62 40177*	Theorem *11.62 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. Importation combined with the rearrangement with quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm11.63 40178	Theorem *11.63 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.7 40179	Theorem *11.7 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	pm11.71 40180*	Theorem *11.71 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜒) → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜒 → 𝜃)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))))
20.33.3  Predicate Calculus
Theorem	sbeqal1 40181*	If 𝑥 = 𝑦 always implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 2-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	sbeqal1i 40182*	Suppose you know 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, assuming 𝑥 and 𝑧 are distinct. Then, 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑦 = 𝑧
Theorem	sbeqal2i 40183*	If 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then we can infer 𝑧 = 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑧 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc5c4c711 40184	Proof of a theorem that can act as a sole axiom for pure predicate calculus with ax-gen 1759 as the inference rule. This proof extends the idea of axc5c711 35532 and related theorems. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	axc5c4c711toc5 40185	Rederivation of sp 2112 from axc5c4c711 40184. Note that ax6 2315 is used for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) Revised to use ax6v 1930 instead of ax6 2315, so that this rederivation requires only ax6v 1930 and propositional calculus. (Revised by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc5c4c711toc4 40186	Rederivation of axc4 2262 from axc5c4c711 40184. Note that only propositional calculus is required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	axc5c4c711toc7 40187	Rederivation of axc7 2258 from axc5c4c711 40184. Note that neither axc7 2258 nor ax-11 2094 are required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc5c4c711to11 40188	Rederivation of ax-11 2094 from axc5c4c711 40184. Note that ax-11 2094 is not required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	axc11next 40189*	This theorem shows that, given axext4 2749, we can derive a version of axc11n 2363. However, it is weaker than axc11n 2363 because it has a distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥)
20.33.4  Principia Mathematica * 13 and * 14
Theorem	pm13.13a 40190	One result of theorem *13.13 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. A note on the section - to make the theorems more usable, and because inequality is notation for set theory (it is not defined in the predicate calculus section), this section will use classes instead of sets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	pm13.13b 40191	Theorem *13.13 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178 with different variable substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
Theorem	pm13.14 40192	Theorem *13.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	pm13.192 40193*	Theorem *13.192 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	pm13.193 40194	Theorem *13.193 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	pm13.194 40195	Theorem *13.194 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	pm13.195 40196*	Theorem *13.195 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. This theorem is very similar to sbc5 3701. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	pm13.196a 40197*	Theorem *13.196 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. The only difference is the position of the substituted variable. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝑦 ≠ 𝑥))
Theorem	2sbc6g 40198*	Theorem *13.21 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑))
Theorem	2sbc5g 40199*	Theorem *13.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑))
Theorem	iotain 40200	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = (℩𝑥𝜑))