![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 149 of 454) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28701) |
![]() (28702-30224) |
![]() (30225-45333) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | absnegd 14801 | Absolute value of negative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘-𝐴) = (abs‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | abscjd 14802 | The absolute value of a number and its conjugate are the same. Proposition 10-3.7(b) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(∗‘𝐴)) = (abs‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | releabsd 14803 | The real part of a number is less than or equal to its absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(d) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℜ‘𝐴) ≤ (abs‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | absexpd 14804 | Absolute value of positive integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((abs‘𝐴)↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | abssubd 14805 | Swapping order of subtraction doesn't change the absolute value. Example of [Apostol] p. 363. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | absmuld 14806 | Absolute value distributes over multiplication. Proposition 10-3.7(f) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) · (abs‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | absdivd 14807 | Absolute value distributes over division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) / (abs‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | abstrid 14808 | Triangle inequality for absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(h) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | abs2difd 14809 | Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | abs2dif2d 14810 | Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | abs2difabsd 14811 | Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | abs3difd 14812 | Absolute value of differences around common element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | abs3lemd 14813 | Lemma involving absolute value of differences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) < (𝐷 / 2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)) < (𝐷 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | reusq0 14814* | A complex number is the square of exactly one complex number iff the given complex number is zero. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥↑2) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 0)) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid1cn 14815 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid2cn 14816 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid1 14817 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. Remark: The proof uses a different approach than the proof of bhmafibid1cn 14815, and is a little bit shorter. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid2 14818 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Syntax | clsp 14819 | Extend class notation to include the limsup function. |
class lim sup | ||
Definition | df-limsup 14820* | Define the superior limit of an infinite sequence of extended real numbers. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. See limsupval 14823 for its value. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 11-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ lim sup = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | limsupgord 14821 | Ordering property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | limsupcl 14822 | Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | limsupval 14823* | The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers, which is the infimum of the set of suprema of all upper infinite subsequences of 𝐹. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | limsupgf 14824* | Closure of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ* | ||
Theorem | limsupgval 14825* | Value of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | limsupgle 14826* | The defining property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐺‘𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | limsuple 14827* | The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗))) | ||
Theorem | limsuplt 14828* | The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | limsupval2 14829* | The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | limsupgre 14830* | If a sequence of real numbers has upper bounded limit supremum, then all the partial suprema are real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) < +∞) → 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | limsupbnd1 14831* | If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | limsupbnd2 14832* | If a sequence is eventually greater than 𝐴, then the limsup is also greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
Syntax | cli 14833 | Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits. |
class ⇝ | ||
Syntax | crli 14834 | Extend class notation with real convergence relation for limits. |
class ⇝𝑟 | ||
Syntax | co1 14835 | Extend class notation with the set of all eventually bounded functions. |
class 𝑂(1) | ||
Syntax | clo1 14836 | Extend class notation with the set of all eventually upper bounded functions. |
class ≤𝑂(1) | ||
Definition | df-clim 14837* | Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 14843 for its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) |
⊢ ⇝ = {〈𝑓, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))} | ||
Definition | df-rlim 14838* | Define the limit relation for partial functions on the reals. See rlim 14844 for its relational expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ⇝𝑟 = {〈𝑓, 𝑥〉 ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 → (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑤) − 𝑥)) < 𝑦))} | ||
Definition | df-o1 14839* | Define the set of eventually bounded functions. We don't bother to build the full conception of big-O notation, because we can represent any big-O in terms of 𝑂(1) and division, and any little-O in terms of a limit and division. We could also use limsup for this, but it only works on integer sequences, while this will work for real sequences or integer sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝑓‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚} | ||
Definition | df-lo1 14840* | Define the set of eventually upper bounded real functions. This fills a gap in 𝑂(1) coverage, to express statements like 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑂(𝑥) via (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)) / 𝑥) ∈ ≤𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.) |
⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚} | ||
Theorem | climrel 14841 | The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ Rel ⇝ | ||
Theorem | rlimrel 14842 | The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ Rel ⇝𝑟 | ||
Theorem | clim 14843* | Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists an integer 𝑗 such that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | rlim 14844* | Express the predicate: The limit of complex number function 𝐹 is 𝐶, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐶, in the real sense. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists a number 𝑦 such that the absolute difference of any number in the function beyond 𝑦 and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | rlim2 14845* | Rewrite rlim 14844 for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | rlim2lt 14846* | Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | rlim3 14847* | Restrict the range of the domain bound to reals greater than some 𝐷 ∈ ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | climcl 14848 | Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | rlimpm 14849 | Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | rlimf 14850 | Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ) | ||
Theorem | rlimss 14851 | Domain closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | rlimcl 14852 | Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | clim2 14853* | Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with more general quantifier restrictions than clim 14843. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | clim2c 14854* | Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | clim0 14855* | Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | clim0c 14856* | Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | rlim0 14857* | Express the predicate 𝐵(𝑧) converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | rlim0lt 14858* | Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | climi 14859* | Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | climi2 14860* | Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | climi0 14861* | Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | rlimi 14862* | Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | rlimi2 14863* | Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | ello1 14864* | Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)) | ||
Theorem | ello12 14865* | Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | ello12r 14866* | Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | lo1f 14867 | An eventually upper bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | lo1dm 14868 | An eventually upper bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | lo1bdd 14869* | The defining property of an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)) | ||
Theorem | ello1mpt 14870* | Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | ello1mpt2 14871* | Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | ello1d 14872* | Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | lo1bdd2 14873* | If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚) | ||
Theorem | lo1bddrp 14874* | Refine o1bdd2 14890 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚) | ||
Theorem | elo1 14875* | Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)) | ||
Theorem | elo12 14876* | Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | elo12r 14877* | Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | o1f 14878 | An eventually bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ) | ||
Theorem | o1dm 14879 | An eventually bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | o1bdd 14880* | The defining property of an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)) | ||
Theorem | lo1o1 14881 | A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (abs ∘ 𝐹) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))) | ||
Theorem | lo1o12 14882* | A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (This function is useful for converting theorems about ≤𝑂(1) to 𝑂(1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))) | ||
Theorem | elo1mpt 14883* | Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | elo1mpt2 14884* | Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | elo1d 14885* | Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | o1lo1 14886* | A real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually lower bounded and eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))) | ||
Theorem | o1lo12 14887* | A lower bounded real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))) | ||
Theorem | o1lo1d 14888* | A real eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | icco1 14889* | Derive eventual boundedness from separate upper and lower eventual bounds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Apr-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑀[,]𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
Theorem | o1bdd2 14890* | If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚) | ||
Theorem | o1bddrp 14891* | Refine o1bdd2 14890 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚) | ||
Theorem | climconst 14892* | An (eventually) constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rlimconst 14893* | A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rlimclim1 14894 | Forward direction of rlimclim 14895. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ dom 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rlimclim 14895 | A sequence on an upper integer set converges in the real sense iff it converges in the integer sense. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | climrlim2 14896* | Produce a real limit from an integer limit, where the real function is only dependent on the integer part of 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) |
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝑛 = (⌊‘𝑥) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | climconst2 14897 | A constant sequence converges to its value. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⊆ 𝑍 & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑍 × {𝐴}) ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | climz 14898 | The zero sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (ℤ × {0}) ⇝ 0 | ||
Theorem | rlimuni 14899 | A real function whose domain is unbounded above converges to at most one limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | rlimdm 14900 | Two ways to express that a function has a limit. (The expression ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹) is sometimes useful as a shorthand for "the unique limit of the function 𝐹"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘𝐹))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |