P. 411 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 41001-41100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cdlemefs29bpre1N 41001*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29cpre1N 41002*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29clN 41003*	Show closure of the unique element in cdleme29c 40960. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1snlem 41004*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1sn 41005*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fvaN 41006*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: consolidate uses of lhpmat 40614 here and elsewhere, and presence/absence of 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) term. Also, why can proof be shortened with cdleme27cl 40950? What is difference from cdlemefs27cl 40997? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fva1 41007*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs31fv1 41008*	Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 39543 3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT. ***END OF VALUE AT ATOM STUFF TO REPLACE ONES BELOW*** "cdleme3xsn1aw" decreased using "cdlemefs32sn1aw" "cdleme32sn1aw" decreased from 3302 to 36 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32sn2aw" decreased from 1687 to 26 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 376 to 375 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 375 to 368 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme35sn3a" decreased from 547 to 523 using "cdleme43frv1sn". (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefr44 41009*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefr45 instead? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefs44 41010*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefs45 41013 instead TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefr45 41011*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefr45e 41012*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefr45 41011. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefr45 41011 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45 41013*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefs45ee 41014*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 41013. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 41013 uses? Should ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) be assigned to a hypothesis letter? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45eN 41015*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 41013. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 41013 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme32sn1awN 41016*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3a 41017*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme32sn2awN 41018*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snaw 41019*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snb 41020*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32fva 41021*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fva1 41022*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fvaw 41023*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32fvcl 41024*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32a 41025*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32b 41026*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑌) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32c 41027*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32d 41028*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32e 41029*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32f 41030*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32le 41031*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme35a 41032	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	cdleme35fnpq 41033	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ 𝐹 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme35b 41034	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))
Theorem	cdleme35c 41035	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) = (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme35d 41036	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme35e 41037	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	cdleme35f 41038	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35g 41039	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊))) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35h 41040	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme35h2 41041	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme35sn2aw 41042*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line case; compare cdleme32sn2awN 41018. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme35sn3a 41043*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme36a 41044	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑡 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme36m 41045	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐶) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme37m 41046	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐶 = 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme38m 41047	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme38n 41048	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO shorter if proved directly from cdleme36m 41045 and cdleme37m 41046? (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme39a 41049	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 41048 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 41016. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐺 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme39n 41050	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 41048 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 41016. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme40m 41051*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT Use proof idea from cdleme32sn1awN 41016. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cdleme40n 41052*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO get rid of '.<' class? (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40v 41053*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Change bound variables in ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 (but we use ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 for convenience since we have its hypotheses available). (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40w 41054*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Apply cdleme40v 41053 bound variable change to ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme42a 41055	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42c 41056	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdleme42d 41057	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3aw 41058*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is different on and off the 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41sn4aw 41059*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for on and off 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41snaw 41060*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for combined cases; compare cdleme32snaw 41019. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41fva11 41061*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is one-to-one for r in W (r an atom not under w). TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑆))
Theorem	cdleme42b 41062*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42e 41063*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42f 41064*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42g 41065*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42h 41066*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42i 41067*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42k 41068*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Since F ' S =/= F'R when S =/= R (i.e. 1-1); then ( ( F ' R ) .\/ ( F ' S ) ) is 2-dim therefore = ( ( F ' R ) .\/ V ) by cdleme42i 41067 and ps-1 40061 TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42ke 41069*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42keg 41070*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42ke 41069 and even combine with it? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42mN 41071*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme42mgN 41072*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42mN 41071? Combine with cdleme42mN 41071? (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme43aN 41073	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 penultimate line: g(f(r)) = (p v q) ^ (g(s) v v1). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ 𝑉)))
Theorem	cdleme43bN 41074	Lemma for Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. g(s) is an atom not under w. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme43cN 41075	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 last line: r v g(s) = r v v2. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme43dN 41076	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 116 2nd line: f(r) v s = f(r) v f(g(s)). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑍 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g2 41077	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. TODO What other conversion theorems would be reused? e.g. cdlemeg46nlpq 41101? Find other hlatjcom 39952 uses giving 𝑄 ∨ 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g1 41078	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))))
Theorem	cdleme17d2 41079*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. 𝐹, 𝐺 represent f(s), fs(p) respectively. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d3 41080*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d4 41081*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d 41082*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme48fv 41083*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41025? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme48fvg 41084*	Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition in cdleme48fv 41083. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41025? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Can this be proved more directly by eliminating 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 in earlier theorems? Should this replace uses of cdleme48fv 41083? (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme46fvaw 41085*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme48bw 41086*	TODO: fix comment. TODO: Remove unnecessary 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 from cdleme48bw 41086 cdlemeg46c 41097 cdlemeg46fvaw 41100 cdlemeg46rgv 41112 cdlemeg46gfv 41114? cdleme48d 41119? and possibly others they affect. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdleme48b 41087*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑊) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme46frvlpq 41088*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑆) is not under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑆 isn't. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme46fsvlpq 41089*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 is. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdlemeg46fvcl 41090*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme4gfv 41091*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 41025? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Would an antecedent transformer like cdleme46f2g2 41077 help? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdlemeg47b 41092*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemeg47rv 41093*	Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑂)
Theorem	cdlemeg47rv2 41094*	Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemeg49le 41095*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐺‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdlemeg46bOLDN 41096*	TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐺‘𝑆) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemeg46c 41097*	TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑆)) = ⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌⦋𝑁 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemeg46rvOLDN 41098*	Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑣⦌𝑂)
Theorem	cdlemeg46rv2OLDN 41099*	Value of gs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐺‘𝑅) = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝐺‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemeg46fvaw 41100*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑁 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑎 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑢 ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑎) → 𝑐 = (if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃), (℩𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 = 𝑂)), ⦋𝑢 / 𝑣⦌𝑁) ∨ (𝑎 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐺‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐺‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))