P. 268 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 26701-26800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cxple3d 26701	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxpmuld 26702	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Proposition 10-4.2(b) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	cxpgt0d 26703	A positive real raised to a real power is positive. (Contributed by SN, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴↑𝑐𝑁))
Theorem	cxpcom 26704	Commutative law for real exponentiation. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	dvcxp1 26705*	The derivative of a complex power with respect to the first argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝑥↑𝑐(𝐴 − 1)))))
Theorem	dvcxp2 26706*	The derivative of a complex power with respect to the second argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐴↑𝑐𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ ((log‘𝐴) · (𝐴↑𝑐𝑥))))
Theorem	dvsqrt 26707	The derivative of the real square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.)
⊢ (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (√‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (1 / (2 · (√‘𝑥))))
Theorem	dvcncxp1 26708*	Derivative of complex power with respect to first argument on the complex plane. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝐴 · (𝑥↑𝑐(𝐴 − 1)))))
Theorem	dvcnsqrt 26709*	Derivative of square root function. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (√‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (1 / (2 · (√‘𝑥))))
Theorem	cxpcn 26710*	Domain of continuity of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.) Avoid ax-mulf 11106. (Revised by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	cxpcnOLD 26711*	Obsolete version of cxpcn 26710 as of 17-Apr-2025. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	cxpcn2 26712*	Continuity of the complex power function, when the base is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	cxpcn3lem 26713*	Lemma for cxpcn3 26714. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (◡ℜ “ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (if((ℜ‘𝐴) ≤ 1, (ℜ‘𝐴), 1) / 2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(𝑈 ≤ (𝐸↑𝑐(1 / 𝑈)), 𝑈, (𝐸↑𝑐(1 / 𝑈)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑎 ∈ (0[,)+∞)∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 (((abs‘𝑎) < 𝑑 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑏)) < 𝑑) → (abs‘(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏)) < 𝐸))
Theorem	cxpcn3 26714*	Extend continuity of the complex power function to a base of zero, as long as the exponent has strictly positive real part. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (◡ℜ “ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t (0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐽 ↾t 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (0[,)+∞), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (𝑥↑𝑐𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐾 ×t 𝐿) Cn 𝐽)
Theorem	resqrtcn 26715	Continuity of the real square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (√ ↾ (0[,)+∞)) ∈ ((0[,)+∞)–cn→ℝ)
Theorem	sqrtcn 26716	Continuity of the square root function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0))    ⇒   ⊢ (√ ↾ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ)
Theorem	cxpaddlelem 26717	Lemma for cxpaddle 26718. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	cxpaddle 26718	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) + (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	abscxpbnd 26719	Bound on the absolute value of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (ℜ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑀↑𝑐(ℜ‘𝐵)) · (exp‘((abs‘𝐵) · π))))
Theorem	root1id 26720	Property of an 𝑁-th root of unity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝑁) = 1)
Theorem	root1eq1 26721	The only powers of an 𝑁-th root of unity that equal 1 are the multiples of 𝑁. In other words, -1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁) has order 𝑁 in the multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers. (In fact, these and their powers are the only elements of finite order in the complex numbers.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝐾) = 1 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝐾))
Theorem	root1cj 26722	Within the 𝑁-th roots of unity, the conjugate of the 𝐾-th root is the 𝑁 − 𝐾-th root. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (∗‘((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝐾)) = ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑(𝑁 − 𝐾)))
Theorem	cxpeq 26723*	Solve an equation involving an 𝑁-th power. The expression -1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁) = exp(2πi / 𝑁) is a way to write the primitive 𝑁-th root of unity with the smallest positive argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))𝐴 = ((𝐵↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) · ((-1↑𝑐(2 / 𝑁))↑𝑛))))
Theorem	zrtelqelz 26724	If the 𝑁-th root of an integer 𝐴 is rational, that root is must be an integer. Similar to zsqrtelqelz 16685, generalized to positive integer roots. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	zrtdvds 26725	A positive integer root divides its integer. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∥ 𝐴)
Theorem	rtprmirr 26726	The root of a prime number is irrational. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑃↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁)) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	loglesqrt 26727	An upper bound on the logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) → (log‘(𝐴 + 1)) ≤ (√‘𝐴))
Theorem	logreclem 26728	Symmetry of the natural logarithm range by negation. Lemma for logrec 26729. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 27-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ran log ∧ ¬ (ℑ‘𝐴) = π) → -𝐴 ∈ ran log)
Theorem	logrec 26729	Logarithm of a reciprocal changes sign. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 28-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ (ℑ‘(log‘𝐴)) ≠ π) → (log‘𝐴) = -(log‘(1 / 𝐴)))
14.3.5  Logarithms to an arbitrary base Define "log using an arbitrary base" function and then prove some of its properties. Note that logb is generalized to an arbitrary base and arbitrary parameter in ℂ, but it doesn't accept infinities as arguments, unlike log. Metamath doesn't care what letters are used to represent classes. Usually classes begin with the letter "A", but here we use "B" and "X" to more clearly distinguish between "base" and "other parameter of log". There are different ways this could be defined in Metamath. The approach used here is intentionally similar to existing 2-parameter Metamath functions (operations): (𝐵 logb 𝑋) where 𝐵 is the base and 𝑋 is the argument of the logarithm function. An alternative would be to support the notational form (( logb ‘𝐵)‘𝑋); that looks a little more like traditional notation. Such a function ( logb ‘𝐵) for a fixed base can be obtained in Metamath (without the need for a new definition) by the curry function: (curry logb ‘𝐵), see logbmpt 26754, logbf 26755 and logbfval 26756.
Syntax	clogb 26730	Extend class notation to include the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base.
class logb
Definition	df-logb 26731*	Define the logb operator. This is the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base. It can be used as (𝐵 logb 𝑋) for "log base B of X". In the most common traditional notation, base B is a subscript of "log". The definition is according to Wikipedia "Complex logarithm": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm#Logarithms_to_other_bases (10-Jun-2020). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ logb = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((log‘𝑦) / (log‘𝑥)))
Theorem	logbval 26732	Define the value of the logb function, the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base, when used as infix. Most Metamath statements select variables in order of their use, but to make the order clearer we use "B" for base and "X" for the argument of the logarithm function here. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	logbcl 26733	General logarithm closure. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	logbid1 26734	General logarithm is 1 when base and arg match. Property 1(a) of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (𝐴 logb 𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	logb1 26735	The logarithm of 1 to an arbitrary base 𝐵 is 0. Property 1(b) of [Cohen4] p. 361. See log1 26550. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (𝐵 logb 1) = 0)
Theorem	elogb 26736	The general logarithm of a number to the base being Euler's constant is the natural logarithm of the number. Put another way, using e as the base in logb is the same as log. Definition in [Cohen4] p. 352. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler and AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) → (e logb 𝐴) = (log‘𝐴))
Theorem	logbchbase 26737	Change of base for logarithms. Property in [Cohen4] p. 367. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐴 logb 𝑋) = ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) / (𝐵 logb 𝐴)))
Theorem	relogbval 26738	Value of the general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	relogbcl 26739	Closure of the general logarithm with a positive real base on positive reals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relogbzcl 26740	Closure of the general logarithm with integer base on positive reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relogbreexp 26741	Power law for the general logarithm for real powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of a real number is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. Property 4 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸)) = (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbzexp 26742	Power law for the general logarithm for integer powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of an integer is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑁)) = (𝑁 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbmul 26743	The logarithm of the product of two positive real numbers is the sum of logarithms. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbmulexp 26744	The logarithm of the product of a positive real and a positive real number to the power of a real number is the sum of the logarithm of the first real number and the scaled logarithm of the second real number. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸))) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶))))
Theorem	relogbdiv 26745	The logarithm of the quotient of two positive real numbers is the difference of logarithms. Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 / 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) − (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbexp 26746	Identity law for general logarithm: the logarithm of a power to the base is the exponent. Property 6 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	nnlogbexp 26747	Identity law for general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	logbrec 26748	Logarithm of a reciprocal changes sign. See logrec 26729. Particular case of Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb (1 / 𝐴)) = -(𝐵 logb 𝐴))
Theorem	logbleb 26749	The general logarithm function is monotone/increasing. See logleb 26568. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by AV, 31-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ≤ (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	logblt 26750	The general logarithm function is strictly monotone/increasing. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 377. See logltb 26565. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) < (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	relogbcxp 26751	Identity law for the general logarithm for real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℝ+ ∖ {1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑐𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	cxplogb 26752	Identity law for the general logarithm. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐵↑𝑐(𝐵 logb 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	relogbcxpb 26753	The logarithm is the inverse of the exponentiation. Observation in [Cohen4] p. 348. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵↑𝑐𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	logbmpt 26754*	The general logarithm to a fixed base regarded as mapping. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (curry logb ‘𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((log‘𝑦) / (log‘𝐵))))
Theorem	logbf 26755	The general logarithm to a fixed base regarded as function. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) → (curry logb ‘𝐵):(ℂ ∖ {0})⟶ℂ)
Theorem	logbfval 26756	The general logarithm of a complex number to a fixed base. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((curry logb ‘𝐵)‘𝑋) = (𝐵 logb 𝑋))
Theorem	relogbf 26757	The general logarithm to a real base greater than 1 regarded as function restricted to the positive integers. Property in [Cohen4] p. 349. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 1 < 𝐵) → ((curry logb ‘𝐵) ↾ ℝ+):ℝ+⟶ℝ)
Theorem	logblog 26758	The general logarithm to the base being Euler's constant regarded as function is the natural logarithm. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (curry logb ‘e) = log
Theorem	logbgt0b 26759	The logarithm of a positive real number to a real base greater than 1 is positive iff the number is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 1 < 𝐵)) → (0 < (𝐵 logb 𝐴) ↔ 1 < 𝐴))
Theorem	logbgcd1irr 26760	The logarithm of an integer greater than 1 to an integer base greater than 1 is an irrational number if the argument and the base are relatively prime. For example, (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) (see 2logb9irr 26761). (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	2logb9irr 26761	Example for logbgcd1irr 26760. The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	logbprmirr 26762	The logarithm of a prime to a different prime base is an irrational number. For example, (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) (see 2logb3irr 26763). (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	2logb3irr 26763	Example for logbprmirr 26762. The logarithm of three to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	2logb9irrALT 26764	Alternate proof of 2logb9irr 26761: The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 26765	The square root of two to the power of the logarithm of nine to base two is three. (√‘2) and (2 logb 9) are irrational numbers (see sqrt2irr0 16176 resp. 2logb9irr 26761), satisfying the statement in 2irrexpqALT 26766. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((√‘2)↑𝑐(2 logb 9)) = 3
Theorem	2irrexpqALT 26766*	Alternate proof of 2irrexpq 26696: There exist irrational numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 such that (𝑎↑𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "constructive proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. In contrast to 2irrexpq 26696, this is a constructive proof because it is based on two explicitly named irrational numbers (√‘2) and (2 logb 9), see sqrt2irr0 16176, 2logb9irr 26761 and sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 26765. Therefore, this proof is also acceptable/usable in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)∃𝑏 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ
14.3.6  Theorems of Pythagoras, isosceles triangles, and intersecting chords
Theorem	angval 26767*	Define the angle function, which takes two complex numbers, treated as vectors from the origin, and returns the angle between them, in the range ( − π, π]. To convert from the geometry notation, 𝑚𝐴𝐵𝐶, the measure of the angle with legs 𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐵 where 𝐶 is more counterclockwise for positive angles, is represented by ((𝐶 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐵)). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (ℑ‘(log‘(𝐵 / 𝐴))))
Theorem	angcan 26768*	Cancel a constant multiplier in the angle function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0)) → ((𝐶 · 𝐴)𝐹(𝐶 · 𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	angneg 26769*	Cancel a negative sign in the angle function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → (-𝐴𝐹-𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	angvald 26770*	The (signed) angle between two vectors is the argument of their quotient. Deduction form of angval 26767. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑌 / 𝑋))))
Theorem	angcld 26771*	The (signed) angle between two vectors is in (-π(,]π). Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ (-π(,]π))
Theorem	angrteqvd 26772*	Two vectors are at a right angle iff their quotient is purely imaginary. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)} ↔ (ℜ‘(𝑌 / 𝑋)) = 0))
Theorem	cosangneg2d 26773*	The cosine of the angle between 𝑋 and -𝑌 is the negative of that between 𝑋 and 𝑌. If A, B and C are collinear points, this implies that the cosines of DBA and DBC sum to zero, i.e., that DBA and DBC are supplementary. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (cos‘(𝑋𝐹-𝑌)) = -(cos‘(𝑋𝐹𝑌)))
Theorem	angrtmuld 26774*	Perpendicularity of two vectors does not change under rescaling the second. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 / 𝑌) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋𝐹𝑌) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)} ↔ (𝑋𝐹𝑍) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)}))
Theorem	ang180lem1 26775*	Lemma for ang180 26780. Show that the "revolution number" 𝑁 is an integer, using efeq1 26493 to show that since the product of the three arguments 𝐴, 1 / (1 − 𝐴), (𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴 is -1, the sum of the logarithms must be an integer multiple of 2πi away from πi = log(-1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑇 / i) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	ang180lem2 26776*	Lemma for ang180 26780. Show that the revolution number 𝑁 is strictly between -2 and 1. Both bounds are established by iterating using the bounds on the imaginary part of the logarithm, logimcl 26534, but the resulting bound gives only 𝑁 ≤ 1 for the upper bound. The case 𝑁 = 1 is not ruled out here, but it is in some sense an "edge case" that can only happen under very specific conditions; in particular we show that all the angle arguments 𝐴, 1 / (1 − 𝐴), (𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴 must lie on the negative real axis, which is a contradiction because clearly if 𝐴 is negative then the other two are positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (-2 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < 1))
Theorem	ang180lem3 26777*	Lemma for ang180 26780. Since ang180lem1 26775 shows that 𝑁 is an integer and ang180lem2 26776 shows that 𝑁 is strictly between -2 and 1, it follows that 𝑁 ∈ {-1, 0}, and these two cases correspond to the two possible values for 𝑇. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((log‘(1 / (1 − 𝐴))) + (log‘((𝐴 − 1) / 𝐴))) + (log‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (((𝑇 / i) / (2 · π)) − (1 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → 𝑇 ∈ {-(i · π), (i · π)})
Theorem	ang180lem4 26778*	Lemma for ang180 26780. Reduce the statement to one variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → ((((1 − 𝐴)𝐹1) + (𝐴𝐹(𝐴 − 1))) + (1𝐹𝐴)) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	ang180lem5 26779*	Lemma for ang180 26780: Reduce the statement to two variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ((((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹𝐴) + (𝐵𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴))) + (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	ang180 26780*	The sum of angles 𝑚𝐴𝐵𝐶 + 𝑚𝐵𝐶𝐴 + 𝑚𝐶𝐴𝐵 in a triangle adds up to either π or -π, i.e. 180 degrees. (The sign is due to the two possible orientations of vertex arrangement and our signed notion of angle). This is Metamath 100 proof #27. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)) → ((((𝐶 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐵)) + ((𝐴 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐶))) + ((𝐵 − 𝐴)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐴))) ∈ {-π, π})
Theorem	lawcoslem1 26781	Lemma for lawcos 26782. Here we prove the law for a point at the origin and two distinct points U and V, using an expanded version of the signed angle expression on the complex plane. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑈 − 𝑉))↑2) = ((((abs‘𝑈)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑉)↑2)) − (2 · (((abs‘𝑈) · (abs‘𝑉)) · ((ℜ‘(𝑈 / 𝑉)) / (abs‘(𝑈 / 𝑉)))))))
Theorem	lawcos 26782*	Law of cosines (also known as the Al-Kashi theorem or the generalized Pythagorean theorem, or the cosine formula or cosine rule). Given three distinct points A, B, and C, prove a relationship between their segment lengths. This theorem is expressed using the complex number plane as a plane, where 𝐹 is the signed angle construct (as used in ang180 26780), 𝑋 is the distance of line segment BC, 𝑌 is the distance of line segment AC, 𝑍 is the distance of line segment AB, and 𝑂 is the signed angle m/_ BCA on the complex plane. We translate triangle ABC to move C to the origin (C-C), B to U=(B-C), and A to V=(A-C), then use lemma lawcoslem1 26781 to prove this algebraically simpler case. The Metamath convention is to use a signed angle; in this case the sign doesn't matter because we use the cosine of the angle (see cosneg 16072). The Pythagorean theorem pythag 26783 is a special case of the law of cosines. The theorem's expression and approach were suggested by Mario Carneiro. This is Metamath 100 proof #94. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 12-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) → (𝑍↑2) = (((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)) − (2 · ((𝑋 · 𝑌) · (cos‘𝑂)))))
Theorem	pythag 26783*	Pythagorean theorem. Given three distinct points A, B, and C that form a right triangle (with the right angle at C), prove a relationship between their segment lengths. This theorem is expressed using the complex number plane as a plane, where 𝐹 is the signed angle construct (as used in ang180 26780), 𝑋 is the distance of line segment BC, 𝑌 is the distance of line segment AC, 𝑍 is the distance of line segment AB (the hypotenuse), and 𝑂 is the signed right angle m/_ BCA. We use the law of cosines lawcos 26782 to prove this, along with simple trigonometry facts like coshalfpi 26434 and cosneg 16072. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 13-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = ((𝐵 − 𝐶)𝐹(𝐴 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ 𝑂 ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)}) → (𝑍↑2) = ((𝑋↑2) + (𝑌↑2)))
Theorem	isosctrlem1 26784	Lemma for isosctr 26787. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 30-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π)
Theorem	isosctrlem2 26785	Lemma for isosctr 26787. Corresponds to the case where one vertex is at 0, another at 1 and the third lies on the unit circle. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 31-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) = (ℑ‘(log‘(-𝐴 / (1 − 𝐴)))))
Theorem	isosctrlem3 26786*	Lemma for isosctr 26787. Corresponds to the case where one vertex is at 0. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 1-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = (abs‘𝐵)) → (-𝐴𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹-𝐵))
Theorem	isosctr 26787*	Isosceles triangle theorem. This is Metamath 100 proof #65. (Contributed by Saveliy Skresanov, 1-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶))) → ((𝐶 − 𝐴)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	ssscongptld 26788*	If two triangles have equal sides, one angle in one triangle has the same cosine as the corresponding angle in the other triangle. This is a partial form of the SSS congruence theorem. This theorem is proven by using lawcos 26782 on both triangles to express one side in terms of the other two, and then equating these expressions and reducing this algebraically to get an equality of cosines of angles. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (abs‘(𝐷 − 𝐸)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) = (abs‘(𝐸 − 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘(𝐺 − 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (cos‘((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵))) = (cos‘((𝐷 − 𝐸)𝐹(𝐺 − 𝐸))))
Theorem	affineequiv 26789	Equivalence between two ways of expressing 𝐵 as an affine combination of 𝐴 and 𝐶. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝐷 · 𝐴) + ((1 − 𝐷) · 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐶 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 · (𝐶 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	affineequiv2 26790	Equivalence between two ways of expressing 𝐵 as an affine combination of 𝐴 and 𝐶. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝐷 · 𝐴) + ((1 − 𝐷) · 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐵 − 𝐴) = ((1 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	affineequiv3 26791	Equivalence between two ways of expressing 𝐴 as an affine combination of 𝐵 and 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝐷) · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 · (𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	affineequiv4 26792	Equivalence between two ways of expressing 𝐴 as an affine combination of 𝐵 and 𝐶. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝐷) · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐶)) ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐷 · (𝐶 − 𝐵)) + 𝐵)))
Theorem	affineequivne 26793	Equivalence between two ways of expressing 𝐴 as an affine combination of 𝐵 and 𝐶 if 𝐵 and 𝐶 are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝐷) · 𝐵) + (𝐷 · 𝐶)) ↔ 𝐷 = ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / (𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	angpieqvdlem 26794	Equivalence used in the proof of angpieqvd 26797. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (-((𝐶 − 𝐵) / (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ+ ↔ ((𝐶 − 𝐵) / (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ∈ (0(,)1)))
Theorem	angpieqvdlem2 26795*	Equivalence used in angpieqvd 26797. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (-((𝐶 − 𝐵) / (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ+ ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵)) = π))
Theorem	angpined 26796*	If the angle at ABC is π, then 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐶. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵)) = π → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶))
Theorem	angpieqvd 26797*	The angle ABC is π iff 𝐵 is a nontrivial convex combination of 𝐴 and 𝐶, i.e., iff 𝐵 is in the interior of the segment AC. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵)𝐹(𝐶 − 𝐵)) = π ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ (0(,)1)𝐵 = ((𝑤 · 𝐴) + ((1 − 𝑤) · 𝐶))))
Theorem	chordthmlem 26798*	If 𝑀 is the midpoint of AB and AQ = BQ, then QMB is a right angle. The proof uses ssscongptld 26788 to observe that, since AMQ and BMQ have equal sides, the angles QMB and QMA must be equal. Since they are supplementary, both must be right angles. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄 − 𝑀)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝑀)) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)})
Theorem	chordthmlem2 26799*	If M is the midpoint of AB, AQ = BQ, and P is on the line AB, then QMP is a right angle. This is proven by reduction to the special case chordthmlem 26798, where P = B, and using angrtmuld 26774 to observe that QMP is right iff QMB is. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋 · 𝐴) + ((1 − 𝑋) · 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄 − 𝑀)𝐹(𝑃 − 𝑀)) ∈ {(π / 2), -(π / 2)})
Theorem	chordthmlem3 26800	If M is the midpoint of AB, AQ = BQ, and P is on the line AB, then PQ 2 = QM 2 + PM 2 . This follows from chordthmlem2 26799 and the Pythagorean theorem (pythag 26783) in the case where P and Q are unequal to M. If either P or Q equals M, the result is trivial. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝑋 · 𝐴) + ((1 − 𝑋) · 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝑄))↑2) = (((abs‘(𝑄 − 𝑀))↑2) + ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝑀))↑2)))