Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 120 of 464) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29181) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29182-30704) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30705-46395) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | ofnegsub 11901 | Function analogue of negsub 11199. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ofsubge0 11902 | Function analogue of subge0 11418. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹)) | ||
Syntax | cn 11903 | Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers. |
class ℕ | ||
Definition | df-nn 11904 |
Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis
books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to
include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a
subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 11908), in contrast to the more elementary
ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7688). See nnind 11921 for the
principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12164 for the set of
nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12176
for ℕ defined in terms of
ℕ0.
This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9329 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 11917 (or its slight variant dfnn2 11916). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω) | ||
Theorem | nnexALT 11905 | Alternate proof of nnex 11909, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5205. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | peano5nni 11906* | Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nnssre 11907 | The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ | ||
Theorem | nnsscn 11908 | The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 11907 and ax-resscn 10859 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ | ||
Theorem | nnex 11909 | The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | nnre 11910 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nncn 11911 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | nnrei 11912 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | nncni 11913 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 1nn 11914 | Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | peano2nn 11915 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | dfnn2 11916* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 11904 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | dfnn3 11917* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | nnred 11918 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nncnd 11919 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | peano2nnd 11920 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnind 11921* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 11926 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12345 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12342, uzind4 12575 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12585 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 11922. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | nnindALT 11922* |
Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The last four
hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are
the induction step and the basis.
This ALT version of nnind 11921 has a different hypothesis order. It may be easier to use with the Metamath program Proof Assistant, because "MM-PA> ASSIGN LAST" will be applied to the substitution instances first. We may eventually use this one as the official version. You may use either version. After the proof is complete, the ALT version can be changed to the non-ALT version with "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH nnind / MAYGROW". (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | nnindd 11923* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | nn1m1nn 11924 | Every positive integer is one or a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 = 1 ∨ (𝐴 − 1) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
Theorem | nn1suc 11925* | If a statement holds for 1 and also holds for a successor, it holds for all positive integers. The first three hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two show that it holds for 1 and for a successor. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | nnaddcl 11926 | Closure of addition of positive integers, proved by induction on the second addend. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnmulcl 11927 | Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-1997.) Remove dependency on ax-mulcom 10866 and ax-mulass 10868. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 24-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnmulcli 11928 | Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | nnmtmip 11929 | "Minus times minus is plus, The reason for this we need not discuss." (W. H. Auden, as quoted in M. Guillen "Bridges to Infinity", p. 64, see also Metamath Book, section 1.1.1, p. 5) This statement, formalized to "The product of two negative integers is a positive integer", is proved by the following theorem, therefore it actually need not be discussed anymore. "The reason for this" is that (-𝐴 · -𝐵) = (𝐴 · 𝐵) for all complex numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 because of mul2neg 11344, 𝐴 and 𝐵 are complex numbers because of nncn 11911, and (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ because of nnmulcl 11927. This also holds for positive reals, see rpmtmip 12683. Note that the opposites -𝐴 and -𝐵 of the positive integers 𝐴 and 𝐵 are negative integers. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (-𝐴 · -𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nn2ge 11930* | There exists a positive integer greater than or equal to any two others. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | nnge1 11931 | A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nngt1ne1 11932 | A positive integer is greater than one iff it is not equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 1)) | ||
Theorem | nnle1eq1 11933 | A positive integer is less than or equal to one iff it is equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2005.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ≤ 1 ↔ 𝐴 = 1)) | ||
Theorem | nngt0 11934 | A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nnnlt1 11935 | A positive integer is not less than one. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 < 1) | ||
Theorem | nnnle0 11936 | A positive integer is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → ¬ 𝐴 ≤ 0) | ||
Theorem | nnne0 11937 | A positive integer is nonzero. See nnne0ALT 11941 for a shorter proof using ax-pre-mulgt0 10879. This proof avoids 0lt1 11427, and thus ax-pre-mulgt0 10879, by splitting ax-1ne0 10871 into the two separate cases 0 < 1 and 1 < 0. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 10879. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | nnneneg 11938 | No positive integer is equal to its negation. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ -𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 0nnn 11939 | Zero is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) Remove dependency on ax-pre-mulgt0 10879. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 0nnnALT 11940 | Alternate proof of 0nnn 11939, which requires ax-pre-mulgt0 10879 but is not based on nnne0 11937 (and which can therefore be used in nnne0ALT 11941). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ 0 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | nnne0ALT 11941 | Alternate version of nnne0 11937. A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | nngt0i 11942 | A positive integer is positive (inference version). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | nnne0i 11943 | A positive integer is nonzero (inference version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 0 | ||
Theorem | nndivre 11944 | The quotient of a real and a positive integer is real. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝑁) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nnrecre 11945 | The reciprocal of a positive integer is real. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2008.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (1 / 𝑁) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nnrecgt0 11946 | The reciprocal of a positive integer is positive. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 0 < (1 / 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | nnsub 11947 | Subtraction of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
Theorem | nnsubi 11948 | Subtraction of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2001.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 − 𝐴) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nndiv 11949* | Two ways to express "𝐴 divides 𝐵 " for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
Theorem | nndivtr 11950 | Transitive property of divisibility: if 𝐴 divides 𝐵 and 𝐵 divides 𝐶, then 𝐴 divides 𝐶. Typically, 𝐶 would be an integer, although the theorem holds for complex 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2005.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((𝐵 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐶 / 𝐵) ∈ ℕ)) → (𝐶 / 𝐴) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnge1d 11951 | A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nngt0d 11952 | A positive integer is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nnne0d 11953 | A positive integer is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | nnrecred 11954 | The reciprocal of a positive integer is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nnaddcld 11955 | Closure of addition of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnmulcld 11956 | Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nndivred 11957 | A positive integer is one or greater. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
The decimal representation of numbers/integers is based on the decimal digits 0 through 9 (df-0 10809 through df-9 11973), which are explicitly defined in the following. Note that the numbers 0 and 1 are constants defined as primitives of the complex number axiom system (see df-0 10809 and df-1 10810). With the decimal constructor df-dec 12367, it is possible to easily express larger integers in base 10. See deccl 12381 and the theorems that follow it. See also 4001prm 16774 (4001 is prime) and the proof of bpos 26346. Note that the decimal constructor builds on the definitions in this section. Note: The number 10 will be represented by its digits using the decimal constructor only, i.e., by ;10. Therefore, only decimal digits are needed (as symbols) for the decimal representation of a number. Integers can also be exhibited as sums of powers of 10 (e.g., the number 103 can be expressed as ((;10↑2) + 3)) or as some other expression built from operations on the numbers 0 through 9. For example, the prime number 823541 can be expressed as (7↑7) − 2. Decimals can be expressed as ratios of integers, as in cos2bnd 15825. Most abstract math rarely requires numbers larger than 4. Even in Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, the largest number used appears to be 12. | ||
Syntax | c2 11958 | Extend class notation to include the number 2. |
class 2 | ||
Syntax | c3 11959 | Extend class notation to include the number 3. |
class 3 | ||
Syntax | c4 11960 | Extend class notation to include the number 4. |
class 4 | ||
Syntax | c5 11961 | Extend class notation to include the number 5. |
class 5 | ||
Syntax | c6 11962 | Extend class notation to include the number 6. |
class 6 | ||
Syntax | c7 11963 | Extend class notation to include the number 7. |
class 7 | ||
Syntax | c8 11964 | Extend class notation to include the number 8. |
class 8 | ||
Syntax | c9 11965 | Extend class notation to include the number 9. |
class 9 | ||
Definition | df-2 11966 | Define the number 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 2 = (1 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-3 11967 | Define the number 3. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 3 = (2 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-4 11968 | Define the number 4. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 4 = (3 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-5 11969 | Define the number 5. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 5 = (4 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-6 11970 | Define the number 6. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 6 = (5 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-7 11971 | Define the number 7. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 7 = (6 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-8 11972 | Define the number 8. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 8 = (7 + 1) | ||
Definition | df-9 11973 | Define the number 9. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 9 = (8 + 1) | ||
Theorem | 0ne1 11974 | Zero is different from one (the commuted form is Axiom ax-1ne0 10871). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ 0 ≠ 1 | ||
Theorem | 1m1e0 11975 | One minus one equals zero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) |
⊢ (1 − 1) = 0 | ||
Theorem | 2nn 11976 | 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 2re 11977 | The number 2 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 2cn 11978 | The number 2 is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 2cnALT 11979 | Alternate proof of 2cn 11978. Shorter but uses more axioms. Similar proofs are possible for 3cn 11984, ... , 9cn 12003. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 2ex 11980 | The number 2 is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ 2 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | 2cnd 11981 | The number 2 is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | 3nn 11982 | 3 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
⊢ 3 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 3re 11983 | The number 3 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 3cn 11984 | The number 3 is a complex number. (Contributed by FL, 17-Oct-2010.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 3 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 3ex 11985 | The number 3 is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ 3 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | 4nn 11986 | 4 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
⊢ 4 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 4re 11987 | The number 4 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 4 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 4cn 11988 | The number 4 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 4 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 5nn 11989 | 5 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 5 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 5re 11990 | The number 5 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 5 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 5cn 11991 | The number 5 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 5 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 6nn 11992 | 6 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 6 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 6re 11993 | The number 6 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 6 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 6cn 11994 | The number 6 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 6 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 7nn 11995 | 7 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 7 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 7re 11996 | The number 7 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 7 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 7cn 11997 | The number 7 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 7 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 8nn 11998 | 8 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 8 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | 8re 11999 | The number 8 is real. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1999.) |
⊢ 8 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 8cn 12000 | The number 8 is a complex number. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 8 ∈ ℂ |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |