Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 120 of 466) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29289) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29290-30812) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30813-46532) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | divgt0ii 11901 | The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐴 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ltmul1i 11902 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ltdiv1i 11903 | Division of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < (𝐵 / 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ltmuldivi 11904 | 'Less than' relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → ((𝐴 · 𝐶) < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 < (𝐵 / 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ltmul2i 11905 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 · 𝐴) < (𝐶 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | lemul1i 11906 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | lemul2i 11907 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (0 < 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | ltdiv23i 11908 | Swap denominator with other side of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 < 𝐵 ∧ 0 < 𝐶) → ((𝐴 / 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ledivp1i 11909 | "Less than or equal to" and division relation. (Lemma for computing upper bounds of products. The "+ 1" prevents division by zero.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 / (𝐶 + 1))) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ltdivp1i 11910 | Less-than and division relation. (Lemma for computing upper bounds of products. The "+ 1" prevents division by zero.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2005.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ ((0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝐵 / (𝐶 + 1))) → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ltdiv23ii 11911 | Swap denominator with other side of 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐵 & ⊢ 0 < 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 / 𝐵) < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ltmul1ii 11912 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. Theorem I.19 of [Apostol] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Paul Chapman, 25-Jan-2008.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ltdiv1ii 11913 | Division of both sides of 'less than' by a positive number. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0 < 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 / 𝐶) < (𝐵 / 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ltp1d 11914 | A number is less than itself plus 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐴 + 1)) | ||
Theorem | lep1d 11915 | A number is less than or equal to itself plus 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 + 1)) | ||
Theorem | ltm1d 11916 | A number minus 1 is less than itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 1) < 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lem1d 11917 | A number minus 1 is less than or equal to itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 1) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | recgt0d 11918 | The reciprocal of a positive number is positive. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 21. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (1 / 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | divgt0d 11919 | The ratio of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 / 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mulgt1d 11920 | The product of two numbers greater than 1 is greater than 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | lemulge11d 11921 | Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | lemulge12d 11922 | Multiplication by a number greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | lemul1ad 11923 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lemul2ad 11924 | Multiplication of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ltmul12ad 11925 | Comparison of product of two positive numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 < 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) < (𝐵 · 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | lemul12ad 11926 | Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | lemul12bd 11927 | Comparison of product of two nonnegative numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐶) ≤ (𝐵 · 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fimaxre 11928* | A finite set of real numbers has a maximum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fimaxre2 11929* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 27-May-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fimaxre3 11930* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a maximum (image set version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fiminre 11931* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers has a minimum. Analogous to fimaxre 11928. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | fiminre2 11932* | A nonempty finite set of real numbers is bounded below. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | negfi 11933* | The negation of a finite set of real numbers is finite. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → {𝑛 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑛 ∈ 𝐴} ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | lbreu 11934* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | lbcl 11935* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains a unique lower bound that belongs to the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lble 11936* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lbinf 11937* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, the lower bound is its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | lbinfcl 11938* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, it contains its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lbinfle 11939* | If a set of reals contains a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to all members of the set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sup2 11940* | A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Stronger version of completeness axiom (it has a slightly weaker antecedent). (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | sup3 11941* | A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | infm3lem 11942* | Lemma for infm3 11943. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝑥 = -𝑦) | ||
Theorem | infm3 11943* | The completeness axiom for reals in terms of infimum: a nonempty, bounded-below set of reals has an infimum. (This theorem is the dual of sup3 11941.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | suprcl 11944* | Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | suprub 11945* | A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | suprubd 11946* | Natural deduction form of suprubd 11946. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | suprcld 11947* | Natural deduction form of suprcl 11944. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | suprlub 11948* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | suprnub 11949* | An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | suprleub 11950* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | supaddc 11951* | The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul1 11953. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝐵)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + 𝐵) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | supadd 11952* | The supremum function distributes over addition in a sense similar to that in supmul 11956. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 + 𝑏)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) + sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | supmul1 11953* | The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that 𝐴 · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝐴 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. This is the simple version, with only one set argument; see supmul 11956 for the more general case with two set arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝐴 · 𝑣)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | supmullem1 11954* | Lemma for supmul 11956. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < ))) | ||
Theorem | supmullem2 11955* | Lemma for supmul 11956. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 𝑤 ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | supmul 11956* | The supremum function distributes over multiplication, in the sense that (sup𝐴) · (sup𝐵) = sup(𝐴 · 𝐵), where 𝐴 · 𝐵 is shorthand for {𝑎 · 𝑏 ∣ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} and is defined as 𝐶 below. We made use of this in our definition of multiplication in the Dedekind cut construction of the reals (see df-mp 10749). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑣 · 𝑏)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 0 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 0 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) · sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) = sup(𝐶, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | sup3ii 11957* | A version of the completeness axiom for reals. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | suprclii 11958* | Closure of supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | suprubii 11959* | A member of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to the set's upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | suprlubii 11960* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | suprnubii 11961* | An upper bound is not less than the supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐵 < sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵 < 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | suprleubii 11962* | The supremum of a nonempty bounded set of reals is less than or equal to an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → (sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | riotaneg 11963* | The negative of the unique real such that 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2005.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝜑) = -(℩𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | negiso 11964 | Negation is an order anti-isomorphism of the real numbers, which is its own inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ -𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , ◡ < (ℝ, ℝ) ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | dfinfre 11965* | The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))}) | ||
Theorem | infrecl 11966* | Closure of infimum of a nonempty bounded set of reals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | infrenegsup 11967* | The infimum of a set of reals 𝐴 is the negative of the supremum of the negatives of its elements. The antecedent ensures that 𝐴 is nonempty and has a lower bound. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -sup({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < )) | ||
Theorem | infregelb 11968* | Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | infrelb 11969* | If a nonempty set of real numbers has a lower bound, its infimum is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infrefilb 11970 | The infimum of a finite set of reals is less than or equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → inf(𝐵, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | supfirege 11971 | The supremum of a finite set of real numbers is greater than or equal to all the real numbers of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, ℝ, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | inelr 11972 | The imaginary unit i is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1999.) |
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | rimul 11973 | A real number times the imaginary unit is real only if the number is 0. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · 𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 = 0) | ||
Theorem | cru 11974 | The representation of complex numbers in terms of real and imaginary parts is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) = (𝐶 + (i · 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | crne0 11975 | The real representation of complex numbers is nonzero iff one of its terms is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0) ↔ (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ≠ 0)) | ||
Theorem | creur 11976* | The real part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | creui 11977* | The imaginary part of a complex number is unique. Proposition 10-1.3 of [Gleason] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | cju 11978* | The complex conjugate of a complex number is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑥) ∈ ℝ ∧ (i · (𝐴 − 𝑥)) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | ofsubeq0 11979 | Function analogue of subeq0 11256. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ((𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) = (𝐴 × {0}) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ofnegsub 11980 | Function analogue of negsub 11278. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f + ((𝐴 × {-1}) ∘f · 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ofsubge0 11981 | Function analogue of subge0 11497. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ((𝐴 × {0}) ∘r ≤ (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹)) | ||
Syntax | cn 11982 | Extend class notation to include the class of positive integers. |
class ℕ | ||
Definition | df-nn 11983 |
Define the set of positive integers. Some authors, especially in analysis
books, call these the natural numbers, whereas other authors choose to
include 0 in their definition of natural numbers. Note that ℕ is a
subset of complex numbers (nnsscn 11987), in contrast to the more elementary
ordinal natural numbers ω, df-om 7722). See nnind 12000 for the
principle of mathematical induction. See df-n0 12243 for the set of
nonnegative integers ℕ0. See dfn2 12255
for ℕ defined in terms of
ℕ0.
This is a technical definition that helps us avoid the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 9408 in certain proofs. For a more conventional and intuitive definition ("the smallest set of reals containing 1 as well as the successor of every member") see dfnn3 11996 (or its slight variant dfnn2 11995). (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) “ ω) | ||
Theorem | nnexALT 11984 | Alternate proof of nnex 11988, more direct, that makes use of ax-rep 5210. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | peano5nni 11985* | Peano's inductive postulate. Theorem I.36 (principle of mathematical induction) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((1 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 + 1) ∈ 𝐴) → ℕ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nnssre 11986 | The positive integers are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℝ | ||
Theorem | nnsscn 11987 | The positive integers are a subset of the complex numbers. Remark: this could also be proven from nnssre 11986 and ax-resscn 10937 at the cost of using more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℂ | ||
Theorem | nnex 11988 | The set of positive integers exists. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | nnre 11989 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nncn 11990 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | nnrei 11991 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | nncni 11992 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 4-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 1nn 11993 | Peano postulate: 1 is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | peano2nn 11994 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | dfnn2 11995* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. This was our original definition, before the current df-nn 11983 replaced it. This definition requires the axiom of infinity to ensure it has the properties we expect. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2014.) |
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | dfnn3 11996* | Alternate definition of the set of positive integers. Definition of positive integers in [Apostol] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2005.) |
⊢ ℕ = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦 + 1) ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | nnred 11997 | A positive integer is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | nncnd 11998 | A positive integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | peano2nnd 11999 | Peano postulate: a successor of a positive integer is a positive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | nnind 12000* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema). The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. See nnaddcl 12005 for an example of its use. See nn0ind 12424 for induction on nonnegative integers and uzind 12421, uzind4 12655 for induction on an arbitrary upper set of integers. See indstr 12665 for strong induction. See also nnindALT 12001. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |