| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 318 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | sh0le 31701 | The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ch0le 31702 | The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shle0 31703 | No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chle0 31704 | No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chnlen0 31705 | A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ch0pss 31706 | The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | orthin 31707 | The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ssjo 31708 | The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | shne0i 31709* | A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | shs0i 31710 | Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | shs00i 31711 | Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | ch0lei 31712 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chle0i 31713 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chne0i 31714* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | chocini 31715 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chj0i 31716 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chm1i 31717 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chjcli 31718 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsleji 31719 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chseli 31720* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | chincli 31721 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsscon3i 31722 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon1i 31723 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon2i 31724 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon2i 31725 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon1i 31726 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chcon3i 31727 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chunssji 31728 | Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chjcomi 31729 | Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chub1i 31730 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chub2i 31731 | Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chlubi 31732 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | chlubii 31733 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 31732). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | chlej1i 31734 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej2i 31735 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej12i 31736 | Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | chlejb1i 31737 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm1i 31738 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm2i 31739 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm3i 31740 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm4i 31741 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj1i 31742 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj2i 31743 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj3i 31744 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj4i 31745 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chnlei 31746 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chjassi 31747 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chj00i 31748 | Two Hilbert lattice elements are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chjoi 31749 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chj1i 31750 | Join with Hilbert lattice one. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ℋ) = ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chm0i 31751 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chm0 31752 | Meet with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ 0ℋ) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | shjshsi 31753 | Hilbert lattice join equals the double orthocomplement of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (⊥‘(⊥‘(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | shjshseli 31754 | A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chne0 31755* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | chocin 31756 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chssoc 31757 | A closed subspace less than its orthocomplement is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chj0 31758 | Join with Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chslej 31759 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chincl 31760 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon3 31761 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon1 31762 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon2 31763 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | chpsscon3 31764 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | chpsscon1 31765 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chpsscon2 31766 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law for strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊊ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | chjcom 31767 | Commutative law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chub1 31768 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chub2 31769 | Hilbert lattice join is greater than or equal to its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chlub 31770 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej1 31771 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chlej2 31772 | Add join to both sides of Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chlejb1 31773 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chlejb2 31774 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of join. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chnle 31775 | Equivalent expressions for "not less than" in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | chjo 31776 | The join of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement is all of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chabs1 31777 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chabs2 31778 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chabs1i 31779 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chabs2i 31780 | Hilbert lattice absorption law. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chjidm 31781 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chjidmi 31782 | Idempotent law for Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chj12i 31783 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chj4i 31784 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | chjjdiri 31785 | Hilbert lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm1 31786 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm2 31787 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm3 31788 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmm4 31789 | De Morgan's law for meet in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj1 31790 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj2 31791 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj3 31792 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chdmj4 31793 | De Morgan's law for join in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chjass 31794 | Associative law for Hilbert lattice join. From definition of lattice in [Kalmbach] p. 14. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | chj12 31795 | A rearrangement of Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | chj4 31796 | Rearrangement of the join of 4 Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | ledii 31797 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | lediri 31798 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | lejdii 31799 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction (join version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | lejdiri 31800 | An ortholattice is distributive in one ordering direction (join version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |