P. 163 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 16201-16300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	efmival 16201	The exponential function in terms of sine and cosine. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (exp‘(-i · 𝐴)) = ((cos‘𝐴) − (i · (sin‘𝐴))))
Theorem	sinhval 16202	Value of the hyperbolic sine of a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((sin‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) = (((exp‘𝐴) − (exp‘-𝐴)) / 2))
Theorem	coshval 16203	Value of the hyperbolic cosine of a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) = (((exp‘𝐴) + (exp‘-𝐴)) / 2))
Theorem	resinhcl 16204	The hyperbolic sine of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((sin‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpcoshcl 16205	The hyperbolic cosine of a real number is a positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	recoshcl 16206	The hyperbolic cosine of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	retanhcl 16207	The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	tanhlt1 16208	The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is upper bounded by 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) < 1)
Theorem	tanhbnd 16209	The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is bounded by 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ (-1(,)1))
Theorem	efeul 16210	Eulerian representation of the complex exponential. (Suggested by Jeff Hankins, 3-Jul-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (exp‘𝐴) = ((exp‘(ℜ‘𝐴)) · ((cos‘(ℑ‘𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(ℑ‘𝐴))))))
Theorem	efieq 16211	The exponentials of two imaginary numbers are equal iff their sine and cosine components are equal. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 15-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = (exp‘(i · 𝐵)) ↔ ((cos‘𝐴) = (cos‘𝐵) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) = (sin‘𝐵))))
Theorem	sinadd 16212	Addition formula for sine. Equation 14 of [Gleason] p. 310. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 10-Nov-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (sin‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) + ((cos‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cosadd 16213	Addition formula for cosine. Equation 15 of [Gleason] p. 310. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) − ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵))))
Theorem	tanaddlem 16214	A useful intermediate step in tanadd 16215 when showing that the addition of tangents is well-defined. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((cos‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘𝐵) ≠ 0)) → ((cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≠ 0 ↔ ((tan‘𝐴) · (tan‘𝐵)) ≠ 1))
Theorem	tanadd 16215	Addition formula for tangent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((cos‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘𝐵) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≠ 0)) → (tan‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((tan‘𝐴) + (tan‘𝐵)) / (1 − ((tan‘𝐴) · (tan‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	sinsub 16216	Sine of difference. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (sin‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) − ((cos‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cossub 16217	Cosine of difference. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) + ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵))))
Theorem	addsin 16218	Sum of sines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) + (sin‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((sin‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (cos‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2)))))
Theorem	subsin 16219	Difference of sines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) − (sin‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((cos‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (sin‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2)))))
Theorem	sinmul 16220	Product of sines can be rewritten as half the difference of certain cosines. This follows from cosadd 16213 and cossub 16217. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)) = (((cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) − (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵))) / 2))
Theorem	cosmul 16221	Product of cosines can be rewritten as half the sum of certain cosines. This follows from cosadd 16213 and cossub 16217. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) = (((cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) + (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵))) / 2))
Theorem	addcos 16222	Sum of cosines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐴) + (cos‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((cos‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (cos‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2)))))
Theorem	subcos 16223	Difference of cosines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐵) − (cos‘𝐴)) = (2 · ((sin‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (sin‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2)))))
Theorem	sincossq 16224	Sine squared plus cosine squared is 1. Equation 17 of [Gleason] p. 311. Note that this holds for non-real arguments, even though individually each term is unbounded. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (((sin‘𝐴)↑2) + ((cos‘𝐴)↑2)) = 1)
Theorem	sin2t 16225	Double-angle formula for sine. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (sin‘(2 · 𝐴)) = (2 · ((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐴))))
Theorem	cos2t 16226	Double-angle formula for cosine. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 24-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(2 · 𝐴)) = ((2 · ((cos‘𝐴)↑2)) − 1))
Theorem	cos2tsin 16227	Double-angle formula for cosine in terms of sine. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(2 · 𝐴)) = (1 − (2 · ((sin‘𝐴)↑2))))
Theorem	sinbnd 16228	The sine of a real number lies between -1 and 1. Equation 18 of [Gleason] p. 311. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (-1 ≤ (sin‘𝐴) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) ≤ 1))
Theorem	cosbnd 16229	The cosine of a real number lies between -1 and 1. Equation 18 of [Gleason] p. 311. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (-1 ≤ (cos‘𝐴) ∧ (cos‘𝐴) ≤ 1))
Theorem	sinbnd2 16230	The sine of a real number is in the closed interval from -1 to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (sin‘𝐴) ∈ (-1[,]1))
Theorem	cosbnd2 16231	The cosine of a real number is in the closed interval from -1 to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘𝐴) ∈ (-1[,]1))
Theorem	ef01bndlem 16232*	Lemma for sin01bnd 16233 and cos01bnd 16234. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((i · 𝐴)↑𝑛) / (!‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4)(𝐹‘𝑘)) < ((𝐴↑4) / 6))
Theorem	sin01bnd 16233	Bounds on the sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((𝐴 − ((𝐴↑3) / 3)) < (sin‘𝐴) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴))
Theorem	cos01bnd 16234	Bounds on the cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((1 − (2 · ((𝐴↑2) / 3))) < (cos‘𝐴) ∧ (cos‘𝐴) < (1 − ((𝐴↑2) / 3))))
Theorem	cos1bnd 16235	Bounds on the cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ ((1 / 3) < (cos‘1) ∧ (cos‘1) < (2 / 3))
Theorem	cos2bnd 16236	Bounds on the cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (-(7 / 9) < (cos‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < -(1 / 9))
Theorem	sinltx 16237	The sine of a positive real number is less than its argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴)
Theorem	sin01gt0 16238	The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴))
Theorem	cos01gt0 16239	The cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (cos‘𝐴))
Theorem	sin02gt0 16240	The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 2 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]2) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴))
Theorem	sincos1sgn 16241	The signs of the sine and cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (0 < (sin‘1) ∧ 0 < (cos‘1))
Theorem	sincos2sgn 16242	The signs of the sine and cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (0 < (sin‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < 0)
Theorem	sin4lt0 16243	The sine of 4 is negative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.)
⊢ (sin‘4) < 0
Theorem	absefi 16244	The absolute value of the exponential of an imaginary number is one. Equation 48 of [Rudin] p. 167. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 9-Feb-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1)
Theorem	absef 16245	The absolute value of the exponential is the exponential of the real part. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Sep-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (abs‘(exp‘𝐴)) = (exp‘(ℜ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	absefib 16246	A complex number is real iff the exponential of its product with i has absolute value one. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1))
Theorem	efieq1re 16247	A number whose imaginary exponential is one is real. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = 1) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	demoivre 16248	De Moivre's Formula. Proof by induction given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Moivre's_formula, but restricted to nonnegative integer powers. See also demoivreALT 16249 for an alternate longer proof not using the exponential function. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)))))
Theorem	demoivreALT 16249	Alternate proof of demoivre 16248. It is longer but does not use the exponential function. This is Metamath 100 proof #17. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 10-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)))))
5.11.1.1  The circle constant (tau = 2 pi)
Syntax	ctau 16250	Extend class notation to include the constant tau, τ = 6.28318....
class τ
Definition	df-tau 16251	Define the circle constant tau, τ = 6.28318..., which is the smallest positive real number whose cosine is one. Various notations have been used or proposed for this number including τ, a three-legged variant of π, or 2π. Note the difference between this constant τ and the formula variable 𝜏. Following our convention, the constant is displayed in upright font while the variable is in italic font; furthermore, the colors are different. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = inf((ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})), ℝ, < )
5.11.2  _e is irrational
Theorem	eirrlem 16252*	Lemma for eirr 16253. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (1 / (!‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → e = (𝑃 / 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	eirr 16253	e is irrational. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ e ∉ ℚ
Theorem	egt2lt3 16254	Euler's constant e = 2.71828... is strictly bounded below by 2 and above by 3. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (2 < e ∧ e < 3)
Theorem	epos 16255	Euler's constant e is greater than 0. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ 0 < e
Theorem	epr 16256	Euler's constant e is a positive real. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.)
⊢ e ∈ ℝ+
Theorem	ene0 16257	e is not 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 0
Theorem	ene1 16258	e is not 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ e ≠ 1
5.12  Cardinality of real and complex number subsets
5.12.1  Countability of integers and rationals
Theorem	xpnnen 16259	The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (ℕ × ℕ) ≈ ℕ
Theorem	znnen 16260	The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Exercise 1 of [Gleason] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ℤ ≈ ℕ
Theorem	qnnen 16261	The rational numbers are countable. This proof does not use the Axiom of Choice, even though it uses an onto function, because the base set (ℤ × ℕ) is numerable. Exercise 2 of [Enderton] p. 133. For purposes of the Metamath 100 list, we are considering Mario Carneiro's revision as the date this proof was completed. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ
5.12.2  The reals are uncountable
Theorem	rpnnen2lem1 16262*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑁) = if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, ((1 / 3)↑𝑁), 0))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem2 16263*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴):ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem3 16264*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ seq1( + , (𝐹‘ℕ)) ⇝ (1 / 2)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem4 16265*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (0 ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem5 16266*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → seq𝑀( + , (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	rpnnen2lem6 16267*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem7 16268*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem8 16269*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘)))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem9 16270*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑀}))‘𝑘) = (0 + (((1 / 3)↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 − (1 / 3)))))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem10 16271*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))
Theorem	rpnnen2lem11 16272*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	rpnnen2lem12 16273*	Lemma for rpnnen2 16274. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen2 16274	The other half of rpnnen 16275, where we show an injection from sets of positive integers to real numbers. The obvious choice for this is binary expansion, but it has the unfortunate property that it does not produce an injection on numbers which end with all 0's or all 1's (the more well-known decimal version of this is 0.999... 15929). Instead, we opt for a ternary expansion, which produces (a scaled version of) the Cantor set. Since the Cantor set is riddled with gaps, we can show that any two sequences that are not equal must differ somewhere, and when they do, they are placed a finite distance apart, thus ensuring that the map is injective. Our map assigns to each subset 𝐴 of the positive integers the number Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴(3↑-𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘), where ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, (3↑-𝑘), 0)) (rpnnen2lem1 16262). This is an infinite sum of real numbers (rpnnen2lem2 16263), and since 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies (𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem4 16265) and (𝐹‘ℕ) converges to 1 / 2 (rpnnen2lem3 16264) by geoisum1 15927, the sum is convergent to some real (rpnnen2lem5 16266 and rpnnen2lem6 16267) by the comparison test for convergence cvgcmp 15864. The comparison test also tells us that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies Σ(𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem7 16268). Putting it all together, if we have two sets 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, there must differ somewhere, and so there must be an 𝑚 such that ∀𝑛 < 𝑚(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑦) but 𝑚 ∈ (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) or vice versa. In this case, we split off the first 𝑚 − 1 terms (rpnnen2lem8 16269) and cancel them (rpnnen2lem10 16271), since these are the same for both sets. For the remaining terms, we use the subset property to establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (where these sums are only over (ℤ≥‘𝑚)), and since Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) = (3↑-𝑚) / 2 (rpnnen2lem9 16270) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) = (3↑-𝑚), we establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) < Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (rpnnen2lem11 16272) so that they must be different. By contraposition (rpnnen2lem12 16273), we find that this map is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1)
Theorem	rpnnen 16275	The cardinality of the continuum is the same as the powerset of ω. This is a stronger statement than ruc 16291, which only asserts that ℝ is uncountable, i.e. has a cardinality larger than ω. The main proof is in two parts, rpnnen1 13048 and rpnnen2 16274, each showing an injection in one direction, and this last part uses sbth 9159 to prove that the sets are equinumerous. By constructing explicit injections, we avoid the use of AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ℝ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rexpen 16276	The real numbers are equinumerous to their own Cartesian product, even though it is not necessarily true that ℝ is well-orderable (so we cannot use infxpidm2 10086 directly). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ≈ ℝ
Theorem	cpnnen 16277	The complex numbers are equinumerous to the powerset of the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ℂ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ
Theorem	rucALT 16278	Alternate proof of ruc 16291. This proof is a simple corollary of rpnnen 16275, which determines the exact cardinality of the reals. For an alternate proof discussed at mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16275, see ruc 16291. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	ruclem1 16279*	Lemma for ruc 16291 (the reals are uncountable). Substitutions for the function 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑋 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, 𝐴, ((((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) + 𝐵) / 2)) ∧ 𝑌 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2), 𝐵)))
Theorem	ruclem2 16280*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Ordering property for the input to 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝐵))
Theorem	ruclem3 16281*	Lemma for ruc 16291. The constructed interval [𝑋, 𝑌] always excludes 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐷𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 < 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑀))
Theorem	ruclem4 16282*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Initial value of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = ⟨0, 1⟩)
Theorem	ruclem6 16283*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Domain and codomain of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ0⟶(ℝ × ℝ))
Theorem	ruclem7 16284*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Successor value for the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐺‘𝑁)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	ruclem8 16285*	Lemma for ruc 16291. The intervals of the 𝐺 sequence are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem9 16286*	Lemma for ruc 16291. The first components of the 𝐺 sequence are increasing, and the second components are decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) ≤ (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ≤ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑀))))
Theorem	ruclem10 16287*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Every first component of the 𝐺 sequence is less than every second component. That is, the sequences form a chain a1 < a2 <... < b2 < b1, where ai are the first components and bi are the second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ruclem11 16288*	Lemma for ruc 16291. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1))
Theorem	ruclem12 16289*	Lemma for ruc 16291. The supremum of the increasing sequence 1st ∘ 𝐺 is a real number that is not in the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, ⟨(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚⟩, ⟨((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨0, ⟨0, 1⟩⟩} ∪ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (1st ∘ 𝐺), ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	ruclem13 16290	Lemma for ruc 16291. There is no function that maps ℕ onto ℝ. (Use nex 1798 if you want this in the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:ℕ–onto→ℝ.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐹:ℕ–onto→ℝ
Theorem	ruc 16291	The set of positive integers is strictly dominated by the set of real numbers, i.e. the real numbers are uncountable. The proof consists of lemmas ruclem1 16279 through ruclem13 16290 and this final piece. Our proof is based on the proof of Theorem 5.18 of [Truss] p. 114. See ruclem13 16290 for the function existence version of this theorem. For an informal discussion of this proof, see mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16290. For an alternate proof see rucALT 16278. This is Metamath 100 proof #22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	resdomq 16292	The set of rationals is strictly less equinumerous than the set of reals (ℝ strictly dominates ℚ). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ≺ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1re 16293	There are at least aleph-one real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ ℝ
Theorem	aleph1irr 16294	There are at least aleph-one irrationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	cnso 16295	The complex numbers can be linearly ordered. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 Or ℂ
PART 6  ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY Here we introduce elementary number theory, in particular the elementary properties of divisibility and elementary prime number theory.
6.1  Elementary properties of divisibility
6.1.1  Irrationality of square root of 2
Theorem	sqrt2irrlem 16296	Lemma for sqrt2irr 16297. This is the core of the proof: if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd by the method of infinite descent (here implemented by strong induction). This is Metamath 100 proof #1. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by JV, 4-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘2) = (𝐴 / 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 2) ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐵 / 2) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	sqrt2irr 16297	The square root of 2 is irrational. See zsqrtelqelz 16805 for a generalization to all non-square integers. The proof's core is proven in sqrt2irrlem 16296, which shows that if 𝐴 / 𝐵 = √(2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are even, so 𝐴 / 2 and 𝐵 / 2 are smaller representatives, which is absurd. An older version of this proof was included in The Seventeen Provers of the World compiled by Freek Wiedijk. It is also the first of the "top 100" mathematical theorems whose formalization is tracked by Freek Wiedijk on his Formalizing 100 Theorems page at http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/ 16296. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∉ ℚ
Theorem	sqrt2re 16298	The square root of 2 exists and is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ ℝ
Theorem	sqrt2irr0 16299	The square root of 2 is an irrational number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (√‘2) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
6.1.2  Some Number sets are chains of proper subsets
Theorem	nthruc 16300	The sequence ℕ, ℤ, ℚ, ℝ, and ℂ forms a chain of proper subsets. In each case the proper subset relationship is shown by demonstrating a number that belongs to one set but not the other. We show that zero belongs to ℤ but not ℕ, one-half belongs to ℚ but not ℤ, the square root of 2 belongs to ℝ but not ℚ, and finally that the imaginary number i belongs to ℂ but not ℝ. See nthruz 16301 for a further refinement. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((ℕ ⊊ ℤ ∧ ℤ ⊊ ℚ) ∧ (ℚ ⊊ ℝ ∧ ℝ ⊊ ℂ))