| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 163 of 506) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31236) |
(31237-32759) |
(32760-50572) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | sinneg 16201 | The sine of a negative is the negative of the sine. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (sin‘-𝐴) = -(sin‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cosneg 16202 | The cosines of a number and its negative are the same. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘-𝐴) = (cos‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tanneg 16203 | The tangent of a negative is the negative of the tangent. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 23-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) ≠ 0) → (tan‘-𝐴) = -(tan‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sin0 16204 | Value of the sine function at 0. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 14-Mar-2005.) |
| ⊢ (sin‘0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | cos0 16205 | Value of the cosine function at 0. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (cos‘0) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | tan0 16206 | The value of the tangent function at zero is zero. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 16-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ (tan‘0) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | efival 16207 | The exponential function in terms of sine and cosine. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = ((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | efmival 16208 | The exponential function in terms of sine and cosine. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (exp‘(-i · 𝐴)) = ((cos‘𝐴) − (i · (sin‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | sinhval 16209 | Value of the hyperbolic sine of a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((sin‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) = (((exp‘𝐴) − (exp‘-𝐴)) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | coshval 16210 | Value of the hyperbolic cosine of a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) = (((exp‘𝐴) + (exp‘-𝐴)) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | resinhcl 16211 | The hyperbolic sine of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((sin‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rpcoshcl 16212 | The hyperbolic cosine of a real number is a positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | recoshcl 16213 | The hyperbolic cosine of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘(i · 𝐴)) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | retanhcl 16214 | The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | tanhlt1 16215 | The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is upper bounded by 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) < 1) | ||
| Theorem | tanhbnd 16216 | The hyperbolic tangent of a real number is bounded by 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((tan‘(i · 𝐴)) / i) ∈ (-1(,)1)) | ||
| Theorem | efeul 16217 | Eulerian representation of the complex exponential. (Suggested by Jeff Hankins, 3-Jul-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (exp‘𝐴) = ((exp‘(ℜ‘𝐴)) · ((cos‘(ℑ‘𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(ℑ‘𝐴)))))) | ||
| Theorem | efieq 16218 | The exponentials of two imaginary numbers are equal iff their sine and cosine components are equal. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 15-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = (exp‘(i · 𝐵)) ↔ ((cos‘𝐴) = (cos‘𝐵) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) = (sin‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | sinadd 16219 | Addition formula for sine. Equation 14 of [Gleason] p. 310. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 10-Nov-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (sin‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) + ((cos‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cosadd 16220 | Addition formula for cosine. Equation 15 of [Gleason] p. 310. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) − ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | tanaddlem 16221 | A useful intermediate step in tanadd 16222 when showing that the addition of tangents is well-defined. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((cos‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘𝐵) ≠ 0)) → ((cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≠ 0 ↔ ((tan‘𝐴) · (tan‘𝐵)) ≠ 1)) | ||
| Theorem | tanadd 16222 | Addition formula for tangent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ((cos‘𝐴) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘𝐵) ≠ 0 ∧ (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≠ 0)) → (tan‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (((tan‘𝐴) + (tan‘𝐵)) / (1 − ((tan‘𝐴) · (tan‘𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | sinsub 16223 | Sine of difference. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (sin‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) − ((cos‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cossub 16224 | Cosine of difference. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) + ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | addsin 16225 | Sum of sines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) + (sin‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((sin‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (cos‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | subsin 16226 | Difference of sines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) − (sin‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((cos‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (sin‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | sinmul 16227 | Product of sines can be rewritten as half the difference of certain cosines. This follows from cosadd 16220 and cossub 16224. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((sin‘𝐴) · (sin‘𝐵)) = (((cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) − (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵))) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | cosmul 16228 | Product of cosines can be rewritten as half the sum of certain cosines. This follows from cosadd 16220 and cossub 16224. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐵)) = (((cos‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) + (cos‘(𝐴 + 𝐵))) / 2)) | ||
| Theorem | addcos 16229 | Sum of cosines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐴) + (cos‘𝐵)) = (2 · ((cos‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (cos‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | subcos 16230 | Difference of cosines. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((cos‘𝐵) − (cos‘𝐴)) = (2 · ((sin‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2)) · (sin‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 2))))) | ||
| Theorem | sincossq 16231 | Sine squared plus cosine squared is 1. Equation 17 of [Gleason] p. 311. Note that this holds for non-real arguments, even though individually each term is unbounded. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (((sin‘𝐴)↑2) + ((cos‘𝐴)↑2)) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | sin2t 16232 | Double-angle formula for sine. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (sin‘(2 · 𝐴)) = (2 · ((sin‘𝐴) · (cos‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | cos2t 16233 | Double-angle formula for cosine. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 24-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(2 · 𝐴)) = ((2 · ((cos‘𝐴)↑2)) − 1)) | ||
| Theorem | cos2tsin 16234 | Double-angle formula for cosine in terms of sine. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (cos‘(2 · 𝐴)) = (1 − (2 · ((sin‘𝐴)↑2)))) | ||
| Theorem | sinbnd 16235 | The sine of a real number lies between -1 and 1. Equation 18 of [Gleason] p. 311. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (-1 ≤ (sin‘𝐴) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) ≤ 1)) | ||
| Theorem | cosbnd 16236 | The cosine of a real number lies between -1 and 1. Equation 18 of [Gleason] p. 311. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (-1 ≤ (cos‘𝐴) ∧ (cos‘𝐴) ≤ 1)) | ||
| Theorem | sinbnd2 16237 | The sine of a real number is in the closed interval from -1 to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (sin‘𝐴) ∈ (-1[,]1)) | ||
| Theorem | cosbnd2 16238 | The cosine of a real number is in the closed interval from -1 to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (cos‘𝐴) ∈ (-1[,]1)) | ||
| Theorem | ef01bndlem 16239* | Lemma for sin01bnd 16240 and cos01bnd 16241. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((i · 𝐴)↑𝑛) / (!‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → (abs‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4)(𝐹‘𝑘)) < ((𝐴↑4) / 6)) | ||
| Theorem | sin01bnd 16240 | Bounds on the sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((𝐴 − ((𝐴↑3) / 3)) < (sin‘𝐴) ∧ (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cos01bnd 16241 | Bounds on the cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → ((1 − (2 · ((𝐴↑2) / 3))) < (cos‘𝐴) ∧ (cos‘𝐴) < (1 − ((𝐴↑2) / 3)))) | ||
| Theorem | cos1bnd 16242 | Bounds on the cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((1 / 3) < (cos‘1) ∧ (cos‘1) < (2 / 3)) | ||
| Theorem | cos2bnd 16243 | Bounds on the cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (-(7 / 9) < (cos‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < -(1 / 9)) | ||
| Theorem | sinltx 16244 | The sine of a positive real number is less than its argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (sin‘𝐴) < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sin01gt0 16245 | The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cos01gt0 16246 | The cosine of a positive real number less than or equal to 1 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]1) → 0 < (cos‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sin02gt0 16247 | The sine of a positive real number less than or equal to 2 is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0(,]2) → 0 < (sin‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sincos1sgn 16248 | The signs of the sine and cosine of 1. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (0 < (sin‘1) ∧ 0 < (cos‘1)) | ||
| Theorem | sincos2sgn 16249 | The signs of the sine and cosine of 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (0 < (sin‘2) ∧ (cos‘2) < 0) | ||
| Theorem | sin4lt0 16250 | The sine of 4 is negative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 19-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ (sin‘4) < 0 | ||
| Theorem | absefi 16251 | The absolute value of the exponential of an imaginary number is one. Equation 48 of [Rudin] p. 167. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 9-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | absef 16252 | The absolute value of the exponential is the exponential of the real part. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Sep-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (abs‘(exp‘𝐴)) = (exp‘(ℜ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | absefib 16253 | A complex number is real iff the exponential of its product with i has absolute value one. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ (abs‘(exp‘(i · 𝐴))) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | efieq1re 16254 | A number whose imaginary exponential is one is real. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (exp‘(i · 𝐴)) = 1) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | demoivre 16255 | De Moivre's Formula. Proof by induction given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Moivre's_formula, but restricted to nonnegative integer powers. See also demoivreALT 16256 for an alternate longer proof not using the exponential function. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴))))) | ||
| Theorem | demoivreALT 16256 | Alternate proof of demoivre 16255. It is longer but does not use the exponential function. This is Metamath 100 proof #17. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 10-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((cos‘𝐴) + (i · (sin‘𝐴)))↑𝑁) = ((cos‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) + (i · (sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴))))) | ||
| Syntax | ctau 16257 | Extend class notation to include the constant tau, τ = 6.28318.... |
| class τ | ||
| Definition | df-tau 16258 | Define the circle constant tau, τ = 6.28318..., which is the smallest positive real number whose cosine is one. Various notations have been used or proposed for this number including τ, a three-legged variant of π, or 2π. Note the difference between this constant τ and the formula variable 𝜏. Following our convention, the constant is displayed in upright font while the variable is in italic font; furthermore, the colors are different. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ = inf((ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})), ℝ, < ) | ||
| Theorem | eirrlem 16259* | Lemma for eirr 16260. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (1 / (!‘𝑛))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → e = (𝑃 / 𝑄)) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | eirr 16260 | e is irrational. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ e ∉ ℚ | ||
| Theorem | egt2lt3 16261 | Euler's constant e = 2.71828... is strictly bounded below by 2 and above by 3. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (2 < e ∧ e < 3) | ||
| Theorem | epos 16262 | Euler's constant e is greater than 0. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.) |
| ⊢ 0 < e | ||
| Theorem | epr 16263 | Euler's constant e is a positive real. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Nov-2008.) |
| ⊢ e ∈ ℝ+ | ||
| Theorem | ene0 16264 | e is not 0. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ e ≠ 0 | ||
| Theorem | ene1 16265 | e is not 1. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ e ≠ 1 | ||
| Theorem | xpnnen 16266 | The Cartesian product of the set of positive integers with itself is equinumerous to the set of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (ℕ × ℕ) ≈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | znnen 16267 | The set of integers and the set of positive integers are equinumerous. Exercise 1 of [Gleason] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℤ ≈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | qnnen 16268 | The rational numbers are countable. This proof does not use the Axiom of Choice, even though it uses an onto function, because the base set (ℤ × ℕ) is numerable. Exercise 2 of [Enderton] p. 133. For purposes of the Metamath 100 list, we are considering Mario Carneiro's revision as the date this proof was completed. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ℚ ≈ ℕ | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem1 16269* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑁) = if(𝑁 ∈ 𝐴, ((1 / 3)↑𝑁), 0)) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem2 16270* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝐴):ℕ⟶ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem3 16271* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ seq1( + , (𝐹‘ℕ)) ⇝ (1 / 2) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem4 16272* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (0 ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem5 16273* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → seq𝑀( + , (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem6 16274* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem7 16275* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) ≤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem8 16276* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑀 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) + Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem9 16277* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)((𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑀}))‘𝑘) = (0 + (((1 / 3)↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 − (1 / 3))))) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem10 16278* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem11 16279* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑛 < 𝑚 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2lem12 16280* | Lemma for rpnnen2 16281. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℕ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥, ((1 / 3)↑𝑛), 0))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen2 16281 |
The other half of rpnnen 16282, where we show an injection from sets of
positive integers to real numbers. The obvious choice for this is
binary expansion, but it has the unfortunate property that it does not
produce an injection on numbers which end with all 0's or all 1's (the
more well-known decimal version of this is 0.999... 15935). Instead, we
opt for a ternary expansion, which produces (a scaled version of) the
Cantor set. Since the Cantor set is riddled with gaps, we can show that
any two sequences that are not equal must differ somewhere, and when
they do, they are placed a finite distance apart, thus ensuring that the
map is injective.
Our map assigns to each subset 𝐴 of the positive integers the number Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴(3↑-𝑘) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘), where ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, (3↑-𝑘), 0)) (rpnnen2lem1 16269). This is an infinite sum of real numbers (rpnnen2lem2 16270), and since 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies (𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem4 16272) and (𝐹‘ℕ) converges to 1 / 2 (rpnnen2lem3 16271) by geoisum1 15933, the sum is convergent to some real (rpnnen2lem5 16273 and rpnnen2lem6 16274) by the comparison test for convergence cvgcmp 15868. The comparison test also tells us that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 implies Σ(𝐹‘𝐴) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝐵) (rpnnen2lem7 16275). Putting it all together, if we have two sets 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, there must differ somewhere, and so there must be an 𝑚 such that ∀𝑛 < 𝑚(𝑛 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑦) but 𝑚 ∈ (𝑥 ∖ 𝑦) or vice versa. In this case, we split off the first 𝑚 − 1 terms (rpnnen2lem8 16276) and cancel them (rpnnen2lem10 16278), since these are the same for both sets. For the remaining terms, we use the subset property to establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) ≤ Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (where these sums are only over (ℤ≥‘𝑚)), and since Σ(𝐹‘(ℕ ∖ {𝑚})) = (3↑-𝑚) / 2 (rpnnen2lem9 16277) and Σ(𝐹‘{𝑚}) = (3↑-𝑚), we establish that Σ(𝐹‘𝑦) < Σ(𝐹‘𝑥) (rpnnen2lem11 16279) so that they must be different. By contraposition (rpnnen2lem12 16280), we find that this map is an injection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2014.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝒫 ℕ ≼ (0[,]1) | ||
| Theorem | rpnnen 16282 | The cardinality of the continuum is the same as the powerset of ω. This is a stronger statement than ruc 16298, which only asserts that ℝ is uncountable, i.e. has a cardinality larger than ω. The main proof is in two parts, rpnnen1 13006 and rpnnen2 16281, each showing an injection in one direction, and this last part uses sbth 9084 to prove that the sets are equinumerous. By constructing explicit injections, we avoid the use of AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) |
| ⊢ ℝ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ | ||
| Theorem | rexpen 16283 | The real numbers are equinumerous to their own Cartesian product, even though it is not necessarily true that ℝ is well-orderable (so we cannot use infxpidm2 10000 directly). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ≈ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | cpnnen 16284 | The complex numbers are equinumerous to the powerset of the positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ℂ ≈ 𝒫 ℕ | ||
| Theorem | rucALT 16285 | Alternate proof of ruc 16298. This proof is a simple corollary of rpnnen 16282, which determines the exact cardinality of the reals. For an alternate proof discussed at mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16282, see ruc 16298. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | ruclem1 16286* | Lemma for ruc 16298 (the reals are uncountable). Substitutions for the function 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀) ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑋 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, 𝐴, ((((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) + 𝐵) / 2)) ∧ 𝑌 = if(((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2) < 𝑀, ((𝐴 + 𝐵) / 2), 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem2 16287* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Ordering property for the input to 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem3 16288* | Lemma for ruc 16298. The constructed interval [𝑋, 𝑌] always excludes 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝐷𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 < 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem4 16289* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Initial value of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘0) = 〈0, 1〉) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem6 16290* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Domain and codomain of the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ0⟶(ℝ × ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem7 16291* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Successor value for the interval sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐺‘𝑁)𝐷(𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem8 16292* | Lemma for ruc 16298. The intervals of the 𝐺 sequence are all nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem9 16293* | Lemma for ruc 16298. The first components of the 𝐺 sequence are increasing, and the second components are decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) ≤ (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁)) ≤ (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)))) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem10 16294* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Every first component of the 𝐺 sequence is less than every second component. That is, the sequences form a chain a1 < a2 <... < b2 < b1, where ai are the first components and bi are the second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐺‘𝑀)) < (2nd ‘(𝐺‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem11 16295* | Lemma for ruc 16298. Closure lemmas for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran (1st ∘ 𝐺)𝑧 ≤ 1)) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem12 16296* | Lemma for ruc 16298. The supremum of the increasing sequence 1st ∘ 𝐺 is a real number that is not in the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ), 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2) / 𝑚⦌if(𝑚 < 𝑦, 〈(1st ‘𝑥), 𝑚〉, 〈((𝑚 + (2nd ‘𝑥)) / 2), (2nd ‘𝑥)〉))) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ({〈0, 〈0, 1〉〉} ∪ 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐺 = seq0(𝐷, 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (1st ∘ 𝐺), ℝ, < ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ran 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ruclem13 16297 | Lemma for ruc 16298. There is no function that maps ℕ onto ℝ. (Use nex 1828 if you want this in the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:ℕ–onto→ℝ.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 6-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:ℕ–onto→ℝ | ||
| Theorem | ruc 16298 | The set of positive integers is strictly dominated by the set of real numbers, i.e. the real numbers are uncountable. The proof consists of lemmas ruclem1 16286 through ruclem13 16297 and this final piece. Our proof is based on the proof of Theorem 5.18 of [Truss] p. 114. See ruclem13 16297 for the function existence version of this theorem. For an informal discussion of this proof, see mmcomplex.html#uncountable 16297. For an alternate proof see rucALT 16285. This is Metamath 100 proof #22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ ℕ ≺ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | resdomq 16299 | The set of rationals is strictly less equinumerous than the set of reals (ℝ strictly dominates ℚ). (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ ℚ ≺ ℝ | ||
| Theorem | aleph1re 16300 | There are at least aleph-one real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (ℵ‘1o) ≼ ℝ | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |