P. 314 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 31301-31400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nlelshi 31301	The null space of a linear functional is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn    ⇒   ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Sℋ
Theorem	nlelchi 31302	The null space of a continuous linear functional is a closed subspace. Remark 3.8 of [Beran] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn    ⇒   ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Cℋ
20.6.11  Riesz lemma
Theorem	riesz3i 31303*	A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Existence part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)
Theorem	riesz4i 31304*	A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn    ⇒   ⊢ ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)
Theorem	riesz4 31305*	A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. See riesz2 31307 for the bounded linear functional version. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))
Theorem	riesz1 31306*	Part 1 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. A linear functional is bounded iff its value can be expressed as an inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 2, see riesz2 31307. For the continuous linear functional version, see riesz3i 31303 and riesz4 31305. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → ((normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))
Theorem	riesz2 31307*	Part 2 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. The value of a bounded linear functional corresponds to a unique inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 1, see riesz1 31306. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))
20.6.12  Adjoints (cont.)
Theorem	cnlnadjlem1 31308*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317 (Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104: every continuous linear operator has an adjoint). The value of the auxiliary functional 𝐺. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺‘𝐴) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·ih 𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem2 31309*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. 𝐺 is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ContFn))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem3 31310*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. By riesz4 31305, 𝐵 is the unique vector such that (𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) for all 𝑣. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → 𝐵 ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	cnlnadjlem4 31311*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. The values of auxiliary function 𝐹 are vectors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	cnlnadjlem5 31312*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. 𝐹 is an adjoint of 𝑇 (later, we will show it is unique). (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝑇‘𝐶) ·ih 𝐴) = (𝐶 ·ih (𝐹‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem6 31313*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. 𝐹 is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ LinOp
Theorem	cnlnadjlem7 31314*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. Helper lemma to show that 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem8 31315*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ContOp
Theorem	cnlnadjlem9 31316*	Lemma for cnlnadji 31317. 𝐹 provides an example showing the existence of a continuous linear adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑧) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑧))
Theorem	cnlnadji 31317*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeui 31318*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeu 31319*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnadj 31320*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnssadj 31321	Every continuous linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopssadj 31322	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ BndLinOp ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopadj 31323	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ)
Theorem	adjbdln 31324	The adjoint of a bounded linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbdlnb 31325	An operator is bounded and linear iff its adjoint is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbd1o 31326	The mapping of adjoints of bounded linear operators is one-to-one onto. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (adjℎ ↾ BndLinOp):BndLinOp–1-1-onto→BndLinOp
Theorem	adjlnop 31327	The adjoint of an operator is linear. Proposition 1 of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ LinOp)
Theorem	adjsslnop 31328	Every operator with an adjoint is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom adjℎ ⊆ LinOp
Theorem	nmopadjlei 31329	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Part of proof of Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘((adjℎ‘𝑇)‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	nmopadjlem 31330	Lemma for nmopadji 31331. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	nmopadji 31331	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Theorem 3.11(v) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) = (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	adjeq0 31332	An operator is zero iff its adjoint is zero. Theorem 3.11(i) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 = 0hop ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) = 0hop )
Theorem	adjmul 31333	The adjoint of the scalar product of an operator. Theorem 3.11(ii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	adjadd 31334	The adjoint of the sum of two operators. Theorem 3.11(iii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom adjℎ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑆) +op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	nmoptrii 31335	Triangle inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) + (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	nmopcoi 31336	Upper bound for the norm of the composition of two bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) · (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	bdophsi 31337	The sum of two bounded linear operators is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 +op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdophdi 31338	The difference between two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 −op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdopcoi 31339	The composition of two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	nmoptri2i 31340	Triangle-type inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((normop‘𝑆) − (normop‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇))
Theorem	adjcoi 31341	The adjoint of a composition of bounded linear operators. Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (adjℎ‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑆))
Theorem	nmopcoadji 31342	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ 𝑇)) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj2i 31343	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇))) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj0i 31344	An operator composed with its adjoint is zero iff the operator is zero. Theorem 3.11(vii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇)) = 0hop ↔ 𝑇 = 0hop )
20.6.13  Quantum computation error bound theorem
Theorem	unierri 31345	If we approximate a chain of unitary transformations (quantum computer gates) 𝐹, 𝐺 by other unitary transformations 𝑆, 𝑇, the error increases at most additively. Equation 4.73 of [NielsenChuang] p. 195. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ UniOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) −op (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇))) ≤ ((normop‘(𝐹 −op 𝑆)) + (normop‘(𝐺 −op 𝑇)))
20.6.14  Dirac bra-ket notation (cont.)
Theorem	branmfn 31346	The norm of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) = (normℎ‘𝐴))
Theorem	brabn 31347	The bra of a vector is a bounded functional. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rnbra 31348	The set of bras equals the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ran bra = (LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bra11 31349	The bra function maps vectors one-to-one onto the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ bra: ℋ–1-1-onto→(LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bracnln 31350	A bra is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (bra‘𝐴) ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn))
Theorem	cnvbraval 31351*	Value of the converse of the bra function. Based on the Riesz Lemma riesz4 31305, this very important theorem not only justifies the Dirac bra-ket notation, but allows to extract a unique vector from any continuous linear functional from which the functional can be recovered; i.e. a single vector can "store" all of the information contained in any entire continuous linear functional (mapping from ℋ to ℂ). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) = (℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))
Theorem	cnvbracl 31352	Closure of the converse of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	cnvbrabra 31353	The converse bra of the bra of a vector is the vector itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (◡bra‘(bra‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bracnvbra 31354	The bra of the converse bra of a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (bra‘(◡bra‘𝑇)) = 𝑇)
Theorem	bracnlnval 31355*	The vector that a continuous linear functional is the bra of. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → 𝑇 = (bra‘(℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))))
Theorem	cnvbramul 31356	Multiplication property of the converse bra function. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) → (◡bra‘(𝐴 ·fn 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·ℎ (◡bra‘𝑇)))
Theorem	kbass1 31357	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩ = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩), i.e., the juxtaposition of an outer product with a ket equals a bra juxtaposed with an inner product. Since ⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩ is a complex number, it is the first argument in the inner product ·ℎ that it is mapped to, although in Dirac notation it is placed after the ket. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) = (((bra‘𝐵)‘𝐶) ·ℎ 𝐴))
Theorem	kbass2 31358	Dirac bra-ket associative law (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩)⟨𝐶 ∣ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ), i.e., the juxtaposition of an inner product with a bra equals a ket juxtaposed with an outer product. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶)) = ((bra‘𝐴) ∘ (𝐵 ketbra 𝐶)))
Theorem	kbass3 31359	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐷⟩. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶))‘𝐷))
Theorem	kbass4 31360	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((bra‘𝐴)‘(((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷) ·ℎ 𝐵)))
Theorem	kbass5 31361	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = (( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩)⟨𝐷 ∣. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) ketbra 𝐷))
Theorem	kbass6 31362	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ )). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (𝐴 ketbra (◡bra‘((bra‘𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)))))
20.6.15  Positive operators (cont.)
Theorem	leopg 31363*	Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈 −op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Theorem	leop 31364*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop2 31365*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of operator ordering in [Young] p. 141. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ≤ ((𝑈‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop3 31366	Operator ordering in terms of a positive operator. Definition of operator ordering in [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝑈 −op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leoppos 31367*	Binary relation defining a positive operator. Definition VI.1 of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leoprf2 31368	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leoprf 31369	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leopsq 31370	The square of a Hermitian operator is positive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	0leop 31371	The zero operator is a positive operator. (The literature calls it "positive", even though in some sense it is really "nonnegative".) Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op 0hop
Theorem	idleop 31372	The identity operator is a positive operator. Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op Iop
Theorem	leopadd 31373	The sum of two positive operators is positive. Exercise 1(i) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑈)) → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 +op 𝑈))
Theorem	leopmuli 31374	The scalar product of a nonnegative real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑇)) → 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇))
Theorem	leopmul 31375	The scalar product of a positive real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leopmul2i 31376	Scalar product applied to operator ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → (𝐴 ·op 𝑇) ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptri 31377	The positive operator ordering relation satisfies trichotomy. Exercise 1(iii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → ((𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≤op 𝑇) ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptr 31378	The positive operator ordering relation is transitive. Exercise 1(iv) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (𝑆 ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → 𝑆 ≤op 𝑈)
Theorem	leopnmid 31379	A bounded Hermitian operator is less than or equal to its norm times the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → 𝑇 ≤op ((normop‘𝑇) ·op Iop ))
Theorem	nmopleid 31380	A nonzero, bounded Hermitian operator divided by its norm is less than or equal to the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ 0hop ) → ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇) ≤op Iop )
Theorem	opsqrlem1 31381*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0hop ≤op 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑢 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑢 ∧ (𝑢 ∘ 𝑢) = 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑣 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑣 ∧ (𝑣 ∘ 𝑣) = 𝑇))
Theorem	opsqrlem2 31382*	Lemma for opsqri . 𝐹‘𝑁 is the recursive function An (starting at n=1 instead of 0) of Theorem 9.4-2 of [Kreyszig] p. 476. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘1) = 0hop
Theorem	opsqrlem3 31383*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))
Theorem	opsqrlem4 31384*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶HrmOp
Theorem	opsqrlem5 31385*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op ((𝐹‘𝑁) ∘ (𝐹‘𝑁))))))
Theorem	opsqrlem6 31386*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ≤op Iop    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤op Iop )
20.6.16  Projectors as operators
Theorem	pjhmopi 31387	A projector is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp
Theorem	pjlnopi 31388	A projector is a linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ LinOp
Theorem	pjnmopi 31389	The operator norm of a projector on a nonzero closed subspace is one. Part of Theorem 26.1 of [Halmos] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ≠ 0ℋ → (normop‘(projℎ‘𝐻)) = 1)
Theorem	pjbdlni 31390	A projector is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	pjhmop 31391	A projection is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp)
Theorem	hmopidmchi 31392	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	hmopidmpji 31393	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Halmos seems to omit the proof that 𝐻 is a closed subspace, which is not trivial as hmopidmchi 31392 shows.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇)
Theorem	hmopidmch 31394	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	hmopidmpj 31395	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdii 31396	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) +op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjddii 31397	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 −op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) −op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdi2i 31398	Chained distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) +op (𝑅 ∘ 𝑇)) → (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑆) +op (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑇)))
Theorem	pjcoi 31399	Composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjcocli 31400	Closure of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)