P. 314 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 31301-31400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	shub1i 31301	Hilbert lattice join is an upper bound of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	shjcli 31302	Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	shjshcli 31303	Sℋ closure of join. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Sℋ
Theorem	shlessi 31304	Subset implies subset of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	shlej1i 31305	Add disjunct to both sides of Hilbert subspace ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	shlej2i 31306	Add disjunct to both sides of Hilbert subspace ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shslej 31307	Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shincl 31308	Closure of intersection of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Sℋ )
Theorem	shub1 31309	Hilbert lattice join is an upper bound of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shub2 31310	A subspace is a subset of its Hilbert lattice join with another. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	shsidmi 31311	Idempotent law for Hilbert subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	shslubi 31312	The least upper bound law for Hilbert subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	shlesb1i 31313	Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	shsval2i 31314*	An alternate way to express subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Sℋ ∣ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥}
Theorem	shsval3i 31315	An alternate way to express subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	shmodsi 31316	The modular law holds for subspace sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴 +ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
Theorem	shmodi 31317	The modular law is implied by the closure of subspace sum. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
20.4.5  Projection theorem
Theorem	pjhthlem1 31318*	Lemma for pjhth 31320. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 (normℎ‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵)) ≤ (normℎ‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (((𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵) ·ih 𝐶) / ((𝐶 ·ih 𝐶) + 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵) ·ih 𝐶) = 0)
Theorem	pjhthlem2 31319*	Lemma for pjhth 31320. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	pjhth 31320	Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed uniquely into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻)) = ℋ)
Theorem	pjhtheu 31321*	Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed uniquely into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102. See pjhtheu2 31343 for the uniqueness of 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
20.4.6  Projectors
Definition	df-pjh 31322*	Define the projection function on a Hilbert space, as a mapping from the Hilbert lattice to a function on Hilbert space. Every closed subspace is associated with a unique projection function. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66, adopted as a definition. (projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴 is the projection of vector 𝐴 onto closed subspace 𝐻. Note that the range of projℎ is the set of all projection operators, so 𝑇 ∈ ran projℎ means that 𝑇 is a projection operator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ projℎ = (ℎ ∈ Cℋ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℎ ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘ℎ)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦))))
Theorem	pjhfval 31323*	The value of the projection map. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦))))
Theorem	pjhval 31324*	Value of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))
Theorem	pjpreeq 31325*	Equality with a projection. This version of pjeq 31326 does not assume the Axiom of Choice via pjhth 31320. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻))) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥))))
Theorem	pjeq 31326*	Equality with a projection. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥))))
Theorem	axpjcl 31327	Closure of a projection in its subspace. If we consider this together with axpjpj 31347 to be axioms, the need for the ax-hcompl 31129 can often be avoided for the kinds of theorems we are interested in here. An interesting project is to see how far we can go by using them in place of it. In particular, we can prove the orthomodular law pjomli 31362.) (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	pjhcl 31328	Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
20.5  Properties of Hilbert subspaces
20.5.1  Orthomodular law
Theorem	omlsilem 31329	Lemma for orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻    &   ⊢ (𝐻 ∩ (⊥‘𝐺)) = 0ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ (⊥‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	omlsii 31330	Subspace inference form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	omlsi 31331	Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ococi 31332	Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴
Theorem	ococ 31333	Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dfch2 31334	Alternate definition of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Cℋ = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℋ ∣ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝑥)) = 𝑥}
Theorem	ococin 31335*	The double complement is the smallest closed subspace containing a subset of Hilbert space. Remark 3.12(B) of [Beran] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	hsupval2 31336*	Alternate definition of supremum of a subset of the Hilbert lattice. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. We actually define it on any collection of Hilbert space subsets, not just the Hilbert lattice Cℋ, to allow more general theorems. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 ℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	chsupval2 31337*	The value of the supremum of a set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	sshjval2 31338*	Value of join in the set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	chsupid 31339*	A subspace is the supremum of all smaller subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	chsupsn 31340	Value of supremum of subset of Cℋ on a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	shlub 31341	Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	shlubi 31342	Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
20.5.2  Projectors (cont.)
Theorem	pjhtheu2 31343*	Uniqueness of 𝑦 for the projection theorem. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	pjcli 31344	Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻)
Theorem	pjhcli 31345	Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	pjpjpre 31346	Decomposition of a vector into projections. This formulation of axpjpj 31347 avoids pjhth 31320. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)))
Theorem	axpjpj 31347	Decomposition of a vector into projections. See comment in axpjcl 31327. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjclii 31348	Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻
Theorem	pjhclii 31349	Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ
Theorem	pjpj0i 31350	Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))
Theorem	pjpji 31351	Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))
Theorem	pjpjhth 31352*	Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	pjpjhthi 31353*	Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)
Theorem	pjop 31354	Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjpo 31355	Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjopi 31356	Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))
Theorem	pjpoi 31357	Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))
Theorem	pjoc1i 31358	Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)
Theorem	pjchi 31359	Projection of a vector in the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(ii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pjoccl 31360	The part of a vector that belongs to the orthocomplemented space. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ∈ (⊥‘𝐻))
Theorem	pjoc1 31361	Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ))
Theorem	pjomli 31362	Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 31331. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml 31363	Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 31331. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjococi 31364	Proof of orthocomplement theorem using projections. Compare ococ 31333. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐻)) = 𝐻
Theorem	pjoc2i 31365	Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)
Theorem	pjoc2 31366	Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ))
20.5.3  Hilbert lattice operations
Theorem	sh0le 31367	The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ch0le 31368	The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	shle0 31369	No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	chle0 31370	No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	chnlen0 31371	A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	ch0pss 31372	The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ))
Theorem	orthin 31373	The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	ssjo 31374	The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ)
Theorem	shne0i 31375*	A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)
Theorem	shs0i 31376	Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴
Theorem	shs00i 31377	Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	ch0lei 31378	The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	chle0i 31379	No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)
Theorem	chne0i 31380*	A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ)
Theorem	chocini 31381	Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ
Theorem	chj0i 31382	Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴
Theorem	chm1i 31383	Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴
Theorem	chjcli 31384	Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	chsleji 31385	Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	chseli 31386*	Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	chincli 31387	Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	chsscon3i 31388	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	chsscon1i 31389	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	chsscon2i 31390	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	chcon2i 31391	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	chcon1i 31392	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	chcon3i 31393	Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	chunssji 31394	Union is smaller than Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	chjcomi 31395	Commutative law for join in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	chub1i 31396	Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	chub2i 31397	Cℋ join is an upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	chlubi 31398	Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	chlubii 31399	Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound of two elements (one direction of chlubi 31398). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	chlej1i 31400	Add join to both sides of a Hilbert lattice ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))