HomeTheorem List (p. 323 of 499)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 323 of 499) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-30893) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(30894-32416) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32417-49836) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | hstle1 32201 | The norm of the value of a Hilbert-space-valued state is less than or equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) ≤ 1) | ||
| Theorem | hst1h 32202 | The norm of a Hilbert-space-valued state equals one iff the state value equals the state value of the lattice one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))) | ||
| Theorem | hst0h 32203 | The norm of a Hilbert-space-valued state equals zero iff the state value equals zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 0 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | hstpyth 32204 | Pythagorean property of a Hilbert-space-valued state for orthogonal vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵))) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))↑2) = (((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴))↑2) + ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵))↑2))) | ||
| Theorem | hstle 32205 | Ordering property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | hstles 32206 | Ordering property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | hstoh 32207 | A Hilbert-space-valued state orthogonal to the state of the lattice one is zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) ·ih (𝑆‘ ℋ)) = 0) → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | hst0 32208 | A Hilbert-space-valued state is zero at the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ CHStates → (𝑆‘0ℋ) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | sthil 32209 | The value of a state at the full Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | stj 32210 | The value of a state on a join. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | sto1i 32211 | The state of a subspace plus the state of its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴))) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | sto2i 32212 | The state of the orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = (1 − (𝑆‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | stge1i 32213 | If a state is greater than or equal to 1, it is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (1 ≤ (𝑆‘𝐴) ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stle0i 32214 | If a state is less than or equal to 0, it is 0. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 0 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0)) | ||
| Theorem | stlei 32215 | Ordering law for states. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ (𝑆‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | stlesi 32216 | Ordering law for states. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1))) | ||
| Theorem | stji1i 32217 | Join of components of Sasaki arrow ->1. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = ((𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴)) + (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | stm1i 32218 | State of component of unit meet. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stm1ri 32219 | State of component of unit meet. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stm1addi 32220 | Sum of states whose meet is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2)) | ||
| Theorem | staddi 32221 | If the sum of 2 states is 2, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stm1add3i 32222 | Sum of states whose meet is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)) = 1 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) + (𝑆‘𝐶)) = 3)) | ||
| Theorem | stadd3i 32223 | If the sum of 3 states is 3, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) + (𝑆‘𝐶)) = 3 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | st0 32224 | The state of the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘0ℋ) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | strlem1 32225* | Lemma for strong state theorem: if closed subspace 𝐴 is not contained in 𝐵, there is a unit vector 𝑢 in their difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | strlem2 32226* | Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐶) = ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐶)‘𝑢))↑2)) | ||
| Theorem | strlem3a 32227* | Lemma for strong state theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → 𝑆 ∈ States) | ||
| Theorem | strlem3 32228* | Lemma for strong state theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. This lemma restates the hypotheses in a more convenient form to work with. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ States) | ||
| Theorem | strlem4 32229* | Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | strlem5 32230* | Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) < 1) | ||
| Theorem | strlem6 32231* | Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stri 32232* | Strong state theorem. The states on a Hilbert lattice define an ordering. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ States ((𝑓‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | strb 32233* | Strong state theorem (bidirectional version). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ States ((𝑓‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐵) = 1) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem2 32234* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐶) = ((projℎ‘𝐶)‘𝑢)) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem3a 32235* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → 𝑆 ∈ CHStates) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem3 32236* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. This lemma restates the hypotheses in a more convenient form to work with. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CHStates) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem4 32237* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem5 32238* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) < 1) | ||
| Theorem | hstrlem6 32239* | Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢)) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | hstri 32240* | Hilbert space admits a strong set of Hilbert-space-valued states (CH-states). Theorem in [Mayet3] p. 10. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ CHStates ((normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐵)) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | hstrbi 32241* | Strong CH-state theorem (bidirectional version). Theorem in [Mayet3] p. 10 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ CHStates ((normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐵)) = 1) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | largei 32242* | A Hilbert lattice admits a largei set of states. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ States (𝑓‘𝐴) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | jplem1 32243 | Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐴)‘𝑢))↑2) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | jplem2 32244* | Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | jpi 32245* | The function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a Jauch-Piron state. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (See strlem3a 32227 for the proof that 𝑆 is a state.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2)) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | golem1 32246 | Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → (((𝑓‘𝐹) + (𝑓‘𝐺)) + (𝑓‘𝐻)) = (((𝑓‘𝐷) + (𝑓‘𝑅)) + (𝑓‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | golem2 32247 | Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → ((𝑓‘((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻)) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐷) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | goeqi 32248 | Godowski's equation, shown here as a variant equivalent to Equation SF of [Godowski] p. 730. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻) ⊆ 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | stcltr1i 32249* | Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | stcltr2i 32250* | Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → 𝐴 = ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | stcltrlem1 32251* | Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐵) = 1 → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | stcltrlem2 32252* | Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | stcltrthi 32253* | Theorem for classically strong set of states. If there exists a "classically strong set of states" on lattice Cℋ (or actually any ortholattice, which would have an identical proof), then any two elements of the lattice commute, i.e., the lattice is distributive. (Proof due to Mladen Pavicic.) Theorem 3.3 of [MegPav2000] p. 2344. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ ∃𝑠 ∈ States ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑠‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑠‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-cv 32254* | Define the covers relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68, whose notation we use. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See cvbr 32257 and cvbr2 32258 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ⋖ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ⊊ 𝑦)))} | ||
| Definition | df-md 32255* | Define the modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a modular pair." See mdbr 32269 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))} | ||
| Definition | df-dmd 32256* | Define the dual modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M* for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a dual modular pair." See dmdbr 32274 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀ℋ* = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑥) ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦))))} | ||
| Theorem | cvbr 32257* | Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvbr2 32258* | Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 = 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvcon3 32259 | Contraposition law for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⋖ℋ (⊥‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cvpss 32260 | The covers relation implies proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cvnbtwn 32261 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cvnbtwn2 32262 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cvnbtwn3 32263 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cvnbtwn4 32264 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvnsym 32265 | The covers relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cvnref 32266 | The covers relation is not reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cvntr 32267 | The covers relation is not transitive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | spansncv2 32268 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (¬ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})))) | ||
| Theorem | mdbr 32269* | Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | mdi 32270 | Consequence of the modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | mdbr2 32271* | Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than mdbr 32269. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | mdbr3 32272* | Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | mdbr4 32273* | Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdbr 32274* | Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdmd 32275 | The dual modular pair property expressed in terms of the modular pair property, that hold in Hilbert lattices. Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | mddmd 32276 | The modular pair property expressed in terms of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdi 32277 | Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdbr2 32278* | Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than dmdbr 32274. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdi2 32279 | Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dmdbr3 32280* | Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdbr4 32281* | Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdi4 32282 | Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | dmdbr5 32283* | Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | mddmd2 32284* | Relationship between modular pairs and dual-modular pairs. Lemma 1.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | mdsl0 32285 | A sublattice condition that transfers the modular pair property. Exercise 12 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. Also Lemma 1.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ssmd1 32286 | Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssmd2 32287 | Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdmd1 32288 | Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssdmd2 32289 | Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (⊥‘𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | dmdsl3 32290 | Sublattice mapping for a dual-modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mdsl3 32291 | Sublattice mapping for a modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mdslle1i 32292 | Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | mdslle2i 32293 | Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | mdslj1i 32294 | Join preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | mdslj2i 32295 | Meet preservation of the reverse mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | mdsl1i 32296* | If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mdsl2i 32297* | If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | mdsl2bi 32298* | If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | cvmdi 32299 | The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mdslmd1lem1 32300 | Lemma for mdslmd1i 32304. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |