HomeTheorem List (p. 323 of 504)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 323 of 504) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31067) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31068-32590) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32591-50390) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnlbi 32201 | A lower bound for the norm of a continuous linear functional. Theorem 3.5(ii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnex 32202 | The norm of a continuous linear Hilbert space functional exists. Theorem 3.5(i) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn) → (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | nmcfnlb 32203 | A lower bound of the norm of a continuous linear Hilbert space functional. Theorem 3.5(ii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (abs‘(𝑇‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normfn‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfnconi 32204* | A condition equivalent to "𝑇 is continuous" when 𝑇 is linear. Theorem 3.5(iii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ (abs‘(𝑇‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfncon 32205* | A condition equivalent to "𝑇 is continuous" when 𝑇 is linear. Theorem 3.5(iii) of [Beran] p. 99. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ (abs‘(𝑇‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | lnfncnbd 32206 | A linear functional is continuous iff it is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → (𝑇 ∈ ContFn ↔ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
| Theorem | imaelshi 32207 | The image of a subspace under a linear operator is a subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝐴) ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | rnelshi 32208 | The range of a linear operator is a subspace. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | nlelshi 32209 | The null space of a linear functional is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn ⇒ ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | nlelchi 32210 | The null space of a continuous linear functional is a closed subspace. Remark 3.8 of [Beran] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ (null‘𝑇) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | riesz3i 32211* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Existence part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) | ||
| Theorem | riesz4i 32212* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinFn & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContFn ⇒ ⊢ ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) | ||
| Theorem | riesz4 32213* | A continuous linear functional can be expressed as an inner product. Uniqueness part of Theorem 3.9 of [Beran] p. 104. See riesz2 32215 for the bounded linear functional version. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → ∃!𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑣) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) | ||
| Theorem | riesz1 32214* | Part 1 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. A linear functional is bounded iff its value can be expressed as an inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 2, see riesz2 32215. For the continuous linear functional version, see riesz3i 32211 and riesz4 32213. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ LinFn → ((normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | riesz2 32215* | Part 2 of the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals. The value of a bounded linear functional corresponds to a unique inner product. Part of Theorem 17.3 of [Halmos] p. 31. For part 1, see riesz1 32214. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ LinFn ∧ (normfn‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem1 32216* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225 (Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104: every continuous linear operator has an adjoint). The value of the auxiliary functional 𝐺. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺‘𝐴) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·ih 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem2 32217* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. 𝐺 is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → (𝐺 ∈ LinFn ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ContFn)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem3 32218* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. By riesz4 32213, 𝐵 is the unique vector such that (𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤) for all 𝑣. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℋ → 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem4 32219* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. The values of auxiliary function 𝐹 are vectors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem5 32220* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. 𝐹 is an adjoint of 𝑇 (later, we will show it is unique). (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝑇‘𝐶) ·ih 𝐴) = (𝐶 ·ih (𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem6 32221* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. 𝐹 is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ LinOp | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem7 32222* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. Helper lemma to show that 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem8 32223* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ContOp | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjlem9 32224* | Lemma for cnlnadji 32225. 𝐹 provides an example showing the existence of a continuous linear adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑧) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadji 32225* | Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjeui 32226* | Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp ⇒ ⊢ ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadjeu 32227* | Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnadj 32228* | Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnlnssadj 32229 | Every continuous linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) ⊆ dom adjℎ | ||
| Theorem | bdopssadj 32230 | Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ BndLinOp ⊆ dom adjℎ | ||
| Theorem | bdopadj 32231 | Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) | ||
| Theorem | adjbdln 32232 | The adjoint of a bounded linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjbdlnb 32233 | An operator is bounded and linear iff its adjoint is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjbd1o 32234 | The mapping of adjoints of bounded linear operators is one-to-one onto. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (adjℎ ↾ BndLinOp):BndLinOp–1-1-onto→BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | adjlnop 32235 | The adjoint of an operator is linear. Proposition 1 of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ LinOp) | ||
| Theorem | adjsslnop 32236 | Every operator with an adjoint is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ dom adjℎ ⊆ LinOp | ||
| Theorem | nmopadjlei 32237 | Property of the norm of an adjoint. Part of proof of Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘((adjℎ‘𝑇)‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | nmopadjlem 32238 | Lemma for nmopadji 32239. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | nmopadji 32239 | Property of the norm of an adjoint. Theorem 3.11(v) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) = (normop‘𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | adjeq0 32240 | An operator is zero iff its adjoint is zero. Theorem 3.11(i) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 = 0hop ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) = 0hop ) | ||
| Theorem | adjmul 32241 | The adjoint of the scalar product of an operator. Theorem 3.11(ii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·op (adjℎ‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | adjadd 32242 | The adjoint of the sum of two operators. Theorem 3.11(iii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom adjℎ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑆) +op (adjℎ‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | nmoptrii 32243 | Triangle inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) + (normop‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoi 32244 | Upper bound for the norm of the composition of two bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) · (normop‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | bdophsi 32245 | The sum of two bounded linear operators is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 +op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | bdophdi 32246 | The difference between two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 −op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | bdopcoi 32247 | The composition of two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | nmoptri2i 32248 | Triangle-type inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ ((normop‘𝑆) − (normop‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | adjcoi 32249 | The adjoint of a composition of bounded linear operators. Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (adjℎ‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadji 32250 | The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ 𝑇)) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadj2i 32251 | The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘(𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇))) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2) | ||
| Theorem | nmopcoadj0i 32252 | An operator composed with its adjoint is zero iff the operator is zero. Theorem 3.11(vii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇)) = 0hop ↔ 𝑇 = 0hop ) | ||
| Theorem | unierri 32253 | If we approximate a chain of unitary transformations (quantum computer gates) 𝐹, 𝐺 by other unitary transformations 𝑆, 𝑇, the error increases at most additively. Equation 4.73 of [NielsenChuang] p. 195. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ UniOp & ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ UniOp ⇒ ⊢ (normop‘((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) −op (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇))) ≤ ((normop‘(𝐹 −op 𝑆)) + (normop‘(𝐺 −op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | branmfn 32254 | The norm of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) = (normℎ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | brabn 32255 | The bra of a vector is a bounded functional. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | rnbra 32256 | The set of bras equals the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ran bra = (LinFn ∩ ContFn) | ||
| Theorem | bra11 32257 | The bra function maps vectors one-to-one onto the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ bra: ℋ–1-1-onto→(LinFn ∩ ContFn) | ||
| Theorem | bracnln 32258 | A bra is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (bra‘𝐴) ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbraval 32259* | Value of the converse of the bra function. Based on the Riesz Lemma riesz4 32213, this very important theorem not only justifies the Dirac bra-ket notation, but allows to extract a unique vector from any continuous linear functional from which the functional can be recovered; i.e. a single vector can "store" all of the information contained in any entire continuous linear functional (mapping from ℋ to ℂ). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) = (℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbracl 32260 | Closure of the converse of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbrabra 32261 | The converse bra of the bra of a vector is the vector itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (◡bra‘(bra‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bracnvbra 32262 | The bra of the converse bra of a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (bra‘(◡bra‘𝑇)) = 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | bracnlnval 32263* | The vector that a continuous linear functional is the bra of. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → 𝑇 = (bra‘(℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvbramul 32264 | Multiplication property of the converse bra function. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) → (◡bra‘(𝐴 ·fn 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·ℎ (◡bra‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass1 32265 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩ = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩), i.e., the juxtaposition of an outer product with a ket equals a bra juxtaposed with an inner product. Since ⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩ is a complex number, it is the first argument in the inner product ·ℎ that it is mapped to, although in Dirac notation it is placed after the ket. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) = (((bra‘𝐵)‘𝐶) ·ℎ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass2 32266 | Dirac bra-ket associative law (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩)⟨𝐶 ∣ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ), i.e., the juxtaposition of an inner product with a bra equals a ket juxtaposed with an outer product. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶)) = ((bra‘𝐴) ∘ (𝐵 ketbra 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass3 32267 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐷⟩. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶))‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass4 32268 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((bra‘𝐴)‘(((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷) ·ℎ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | kbass5 32269 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = (( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩)⟨𝐷 ∣. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) ketbra 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | kbass6 32270 | Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ )). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (𝐴 ketbra (◡bra‘((bra‘𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷))))) | ||
| Theorem | leopg 32271* | Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈 −op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | leop 32272* | Ordering relation for operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leop2 32273* | Ordering relation for operators. Definition of operator ordering in [Young] p. 141. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ≤ ((𝑈‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leop3 32274 | Operator ordering in terms of a positive operator. Definition of operator ordering in [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝑈 −op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | leoppos 32275* | Binary relation defining a positive operator. Definition VI.1 of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | leoprf2 32276 | The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | leoprf 32277 | The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | leopsq 32278 | The square of a Hermitian operator is positive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | 0leop 32279 | The zero operator is a positive operator. (The literature calls it "positive", even though in some sense it is really "nonnegative".) Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0hop ≤op 0hop | ||
| Theorem | idleop 32280 | The identity operator is a positive operator. Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0hop ≤op Iop | ||
| Theorem | leopadd 32281 | The sum of two positive operators is positive. Exercise 1(i) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑈)) → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 +op 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leopmuli 32282 | The scalar product of a nonnegative real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑇)) → 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | leopmul 32283 | The scalar product of a positive real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | leopmul2i 32284 | Scalar product applied to operator ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → (𝐴 ·op 𝑇) ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leoptri 32285 | The positive operator ordering relation satisfies trichotomy. Exercise 1(iii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → ((𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≤op 𝑇) ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | leoptr 32286 | The positive operator ordering relation is transitive. Exercise 1(iv) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (𝑆 ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → 𝑆 ≤op 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | leopnmid 32287 | A bounded Hermitian operator is less than or equal to its norm times the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → 𝑇 ≤op ((normop‘𝑇) ·op Iop )) | ||
| Theorem | nmopleid 32288 | A nonzero, bounded Hermitian operator divided by its norm is less than or equal to the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ 0hop ) → ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇) ≤op Iop ) | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem1 32289* | Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 0hop ≤op 𝑇 & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑢 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑢 ∧ (𝑢 ∘ 𝑢) = 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑣 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑣 ∧ (𝑣 ∘ 𝑣) = 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem2 32290* | Lemma for opsqri . 𝐹‘𝑁 is the recursive function An (starting at n=1 instead of 0) of Theorem 9.4-2 of [Kreyszig] p. 476. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹‘1) = 0hop | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem3 32291* | Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop })) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺))))) | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem4 32292* | Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop })) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶HrmOp | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem5 32293* | Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op ((𝐹‘𝑁) ∘ (𝐹‘𝑁)))))) | ||
| Theorem | opsqrlem6 32294* | Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop })) & ⊢ 𝑇 ≤op Iop ⇒ ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤op Iop ) | ||
| Theorem | pjhmopi 32295 | A projector is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp | ||
| Theorem | pjlnopi 32296 | A projector is a linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ LinOp | ||
| Theorem | pjnmopi 32297 | The operator norm of a projector on a nonzero closed subspace is one. Part of Theorem 26.1 of [Halmos] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ≠ 0ℋ → (normop‘(projℎ‘𝐻)) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | pjbdlni 32298 | A projector is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ BndLinOp | ||
| Theorem | pjhmop 32299 | A projection is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp) | ||
| Theorem | hmopidmchi 32300 | An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp & ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |